Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
T12N R4W SEC 10 W2SE4NW4NW4 PTN
Onsite File T12n R4W Sec 10 W2 SE4 NW4 NW4 Ptn PID# 011-111-19 Previously known as Sandy Beach Parcel 1 and 2 .vaT,F. __.. .. +11-11 All,.� �r 1 4 y - _. - • T 1 ! I ! ` :Fo .ewE awI All) v. 1111 - - Avr9p NOOSE iI�TEKIOR yi c NAME Z wWKuImENLRt 4LASNA 11i�.N.ENTAL CONTUL SEFVICES, INC Li / 111 01 Illi_ "��� eu,v IN��pl —I �411y rlll l• I 1WEST 53,d, AVE. SUITE B ANCHOflROE ALp$Np 99303 -(907)561509D CLLe _rcJ w' E dia,vec i I q 4¢ vvvvI6 �� IIII ff u 1 / DT1001507 k<Q.<oa—AI 1r-111 .nE +11-11 All,.� �r 1 4 y - _. - • T 1 ! I ! ` :Fo .ewE awI All) v. J 1111 - - II HI t ll .- .. —,, .Acus ne v evs< yi c NAME Z wWKuImENLRt 4LASNA 11i�.N.ENTAL CONTUL SEFVICES, INC Li / 111 01 Illi_ "��� eu,v IN��pl —I �411y rlll l• I 1WEST 53,d, AVE. SUITE B ANCHOflROE ALp$Np 99303 -(907)561509D CLLe _rcJ w' E dia,vec i I J 1111 - - II HI t ll .- .. —,, .Acus ne v evs< yi c NAME Z wWKuImENLRt 4LASNA 11i�.N.ENTAL CONTUL SEFVICES, INC Li / 111 01 Illi_ "��� eu,v IN��pl —I �411y rlll l• I 1WEST 53,d, AVE. SUITE B ANCHOflROE ALp$Np 99303 -(907)561509D CLLe _rcJ w' E dia,vec f —", �J Frlrslir, - --- I II♦=mi l \ 1111 - - II HI t ll .- .. —,, .Acus ne v evs< yi c NAME Z wWKuImENLRt 4LASNA 11i�.N.ENTAL CONTUL SEFVICES, INC / 111 01 Illi_ "��� eu,v IN��pl —I �411y rlll l• I 1WEST 53,d, AVE. SUITE B ANCHOflROE ALp$Np 99303 -(907)561509D CLLe _rcJ w' E dia,vec u 1 / DT1001507 �fql 9g •x� 49 PEV TTU \ 1111 - - II HI t ll '.v., ceme<w yi c NAME Z wWKuImENLRt 4LASNA 11i�.N.ENTAL CONTUL SEFVICES, INC / 111 01 Illi_ "��� eu,v IN��pl —I �411y rlll l• I 1WEST 53,d, AVE. SUITE B ANCHOflROE ALp$Np 99303 -(907)561509D CLLe _rcJ w' E dia,vec Q,,,,i, 2�a,\ S,,, -o C e) �j OVDcA Cb v 'I'.q9 Name MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE MUNICIPALITY OF A HHurcHuc DEPT. OF HEALTH & DE ITMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SER cS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Environmental Health Division 825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502, Telephone 264-4720 r. 1 ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM AND/OR WELL INSPECTION REPORT DIST E;V TO SEPTIC ABSORPTION M WELL cu,= FRO _ TANI( FIELD /Zoo W A t/e, S&�icc%rn^a�� 99 0' WELL t �— Phonets) Permit//N��o�ry N. olu�Bedr opet ��Q ` /{,�(� r Or LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT LINE_ �� Lol Block Subdivision n/A I .5A"1))1 86, Township. Range, Section ScZc 10 , 1"/z!:/, 2 4 W , 5,/Ll ro JFK" ^—� TANKS _ [e SEPTIC(jNNOVAr1VC—) O HOLDING Man W aelu rer WA C= Capacity in gallons CNYIPONM�///k C_ Malenel No. of Compartments -- divpc e / (/C TYPE OF SYSTEM i [''TRENCH [I HED ❑ W. DRAIN [1 OTHER Depth to pipe bottom IromI depth nearoriginal grader original grade. 15Ao17 FT �FT RII added above clinical grade �g Gravel depth bnneath pipe A 3ravehleng;h Gravel -.5-b FT FT Total absorption area Distance between lines ( SO FT /Z Number or alesT l rating Pipe material P �(j„ a 40,5, 995, SQ FT PPIC', mop4r (/Z`? siyei!45 Inslaller Dale Installed okz (s��c-uG WELLS LVI PRIVATE O OTHER (Identify) on IA, B,C) l etas Depth Cased to Dale Instauctl: FT REMARKS: J ! _P 1 20 ,/�iL2El[ci1 �Q4 Cc -al �"`�CCQ Municipal and Slate guidelines in effect on this date: FT FT FT Inspections Performed by. sLc-D�L���d`A �T�iaue�k Date. certify that this inspection was perlornled according to all Health Department Approval: _ _ m— Date. ENGINEER'S SEAL �- 1;�K���������~� �� ���������� DEPARlPILIN T OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 825 L r:. ANCHORAGE, AK 99501 . , 'ERMIT NO: 86O246 ENGINEERED DESIGN >ATE ISSUED: 07/29/86 �PPLlN: LlONEL URBAN/AECS 0DRESS: 1200 33RD AVE" SUITE B ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 �ON|ACT PHONE: 561-5040 £GAL DESCRIP: GUBDIVISION: SANDY BEACH LOT: P.1 BLOCK: N/A SECTION: 10 TOWNSHIP: 12N RANGE: 4W � OT SIZE: 90 00 ~ (SQ,FT. OR ACRES) -certifv that: 1" I am �amiliar with the requirements or on-site sewers and wells as set �orth by the Municipality o� Anchorage (MOA> and 1'. 11 State o[ Alaska. 2. I will install the system in accordance with all MOA codes and regulcit tions� and in compliance with the design criteria of this permit. 3. I will adhere to all MOA and State of Alaska requirements �or the set back distances from an� existing well, wastewater disposal system or public sewerage sysLem on this or any adjacent or nearby lot" F A LIFT STATION IS INSTALLED IN AN AREA COVERED BY MOA BUILDING CODES, lfEN (1) AN ELECTRICAL PERM|T AND INSPECTION MUST BE OBTAINED; (2> AS-BUILTS /ILL NOT BE APPROVED WITHOUT AN ELECTRICAL INSPECTION REPORT; AND (3) THE lECTRICA lCIAN. .1 0,11 DATE: /PPLICANT: LlO U L. C', S SSUED BY DATE: ' � -�� ���Y,� ����'� ce- ' ����� [\</ J, U~�' � � ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. 1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 (907) 561-5040 SHEET NO.-------_---- OF p/-- CALCULATED BY S�C! DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE ago �� e°� _.. auo $�000 aoeoQi 9 0 C. REID, J a e .2251 1` ® oo I sran_y ,yous� I _ vo ,� 77/- z (P�oPosEDjI _ _ E� THSIo"( 2 I. /00 1ALMORM ml,4vin /ilim"1VIN6 CONTROL SERVICES, INC. 1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite 8 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 (907) 561.5040 JO© SHEET NO. - -- _ OF _ CALCULATED BY CHCCKED BV DATE SCALE LE -.K/ / 181% / / ZE:T �. A til <Poo,�seo �e moo'— ! y° 57 - ��� �sv /00, r_ Mr W - i �C I-neArloj 5T0�'y Ho[✓s I ,\ ° WELD , / i <Poo,�seo �e moo'— ! y° 57 - ��� �sv /00, f;P?i_IC P.I lnrl` , hNC, IC's Last 56t1) Avneue Anchorage, Alaska 90518 (907) 562-2560 August 5; 1906 All. :,3Sc11]Ies will r. -x_= , .1.- � :?� .::.i'7 , .!.�,.; ��', 7 1,,->tr iiC All bests All &-� ,'._i(]U1V LC'D"%. i: BOD 30 LIhV1. �•-' �.. ,ice., !' A r �_ 1A: ���GY'r"1l n–W !.Q {_l:'r" D ar Y 'c ^ , r ,rr p'>Ko l,ruw � � � c;� �,. ci?' �, : (,u! ..c3cI beea. Ul-.]('l1 r`!�l.0 ^.1 (_7�1. ( Y1 sr_JC C -J :'.: l.t ,� 7l MOM into G-_„ i � d ` tivl7J,c. cli c.'Y l,^; ard NVOMS: CI.!-'; i<:',:. 1421 jLl , �1��� rry r• � coll i ow of 20 colon Noy—, .100,, flus :f__I.Mm", f'_ 10 [l ,:F ::i !rl 'rl i.J... ,1 �.-��A cir .il. tj„jag of nkr&q .-Kjoddb_a ) 11 l� _CiC.�C1 i`:71 i! Jf�..l. ?, �hl.I,ri�d. �1 4C -)C1 17_C `�'�. ),I �!C f'}Z C1� r '_ �. itA%ti�-! \f��_{ :I_j�{ il(? tL'Fn 6-,i g - i'I_'l'. -i CU .;0: S. At ,. i_Ci- J. _. ] I _i .•-,. I � -%"� tl�i � A' � -, l r r..4ii7 I:i7!n p1 c r .jll`irc J�C.).i testing All noutrackor to all c All. :,3Sc11]Ies will r. -x_= , .1.- � :?� .::.i'7 , .!.�,.; ��', 7 1,,->tr iiC All bests All &-� ,'._i(]U1V LC'D"%. i: BOD 30 LIhV1. i'Ccal C',C)J_1:CC'n-rl A r �_ 1A: ���GY'r"1l n–W !.Q {_l:'r" W.usolve.d f xygro:c2 TI�ST'U\X-1 C 131 c ,l NATJIVP.''-1 S.NA-141 u -1—A J-) JYM-1 !.1-4--. '' j_- --, - ----- -- )4111)Ic''II) -C, TV,�T.C. 71 I , I - yr UT u -1—A J-) JYM-1 !.1-4--. '' j_- --, - ----- -- )4111)Ic''II) -C, TV,�T.C. ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL C'" 4TROL SERVICES, INC. 1200 W. 33rd Avenue Suite B ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 (907) 2-76-136-1-- WE ARE SENDING YOU XIAttached ❑ Under separate cover ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Plans 11 ___ DATE AT-ENTION RE NO. DESCRIPTION -_ / /46- he following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION -_ / /46- _/ ------ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: XFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR SIDS DUE__—_ REMARKS ❑ Resubmit --copies for approval ❑ Submit——copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY SIGNED: % f It enclosures are nut as noted, kindly notl/y us at once. ALASKA endIROWUAL COnTROL SCfluff<S, IN. Cngineerinq & enuironmental Studies August 5, 1986 Department of Health & Human Services 825 L. Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Attn: Steve Morris Re: Application for On -Site Sewer & Water Systems Parcel 1, Sandy Beach Subdivision. Dear Steve: Upon visiting the above referenced lot to lay out the proposed on-site sewer system I found the Contractor had not obtained a copy of the permit for construction. I called Laura Ward, of your department, and inquired about the permit and a written waiver for 100 to 60 feet from Sand Lake to the closest edge of the absorption area. I have attached a copy of the letter to DEC requesting this waiver. There was no waiver written or testing & evaluation procedure included as a conditional on the permit as required by Section 15.05.110 of the Municipality of Anchorage Ordinance for On --Site Sewer System. Therefore, I am requesting you address this point at this time. Additionally, upon taking some precautionary measurements from the lake to the proposed absorption area I found the separation distance to be 55 feet. The .lake may be somewhat high at this time but I doubt that the current level is high enough to decrease the setback by 5 feet from the originally proposed distance. In light of the fact that a permit has been issued for an innovative wastewater treatment system, I am requesting that you waive the 100 foot separation distance to the lake to 50 feet. Please make this waiver in a written document in a timely manner. Attached is a copy of the letter from DEC directing your office to address the waiver to the lake. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, =eiF. SteCords Civil Engineer A4ff �Q E7 "✓�v ° �!e • • Io����--a7°i90 ales•®d • eno/ono•+^-r.Il ann N•e•� • LEROY C. RL 001esd�13rd Auenue. Suite BeAnehorage. Alaska 99503o(907) 561-50d0 ALASKA HUIROnMenTAL COWROL SOUICCs, Inc. Engmevinq & enutronmenlal Studies July 17, 1986 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Anchorage/Western District Off. 437 E. Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Attn: Steve Eng Re: Parcel 1, Sandy Beach Subdivision Dear Steve: Enclosed find information which will hopefully assist you in your review of this project. Identical information is being submitted to Steve Morris with the Municipality of Anchorage, Department of Health & Human Services for review. The proposed Ridwaste Environmental System will provide primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment for domestic wastewater. The final effluent is proposed to be discharged to a subsurface absorption area. Disinfection with photozone (activated air) will be constant to insure good quality effluent. Parcel 1 is a small lot but suitable soil has been found making it possible to develop. A percolation test revealed a soil rating of 62 square feet per bedroom. The design has been based on 125 square feet per bedroom as a safety factor. Sieve analysis shows the soil will provided adequate filtering for subsurface disposal.. Based on the above facts, enclosed documents, and your own sound professional judgement, we request that you waive the separation distance of 100 feet from Sand Lake to the septic tank and disposal area to 69 and 60 feet respectively, for this particular property. Disinfection and proper maintenance should insure that no health hazard will be induced if this waiver is granted. Please review the enclosed data carefully and if you have any questions please call us at 561-5040. Sincerely, Steven P. Cords Civil Engineer 4Approve by: Enclosures i,)nn 111ett 43rd Auenuv Sndp � • AnArgne 4,4o 99503 • 1907) 561-5040 Permit No: Date Issued Applicant: MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Departme.n. if Health and Envir.onmenta Protection Pouch 6-650, Anchorage, AK 99502 2.64--4720 _ rKater—Permit j HANDWRITTEN N /mac=�-S' Address: Legal Description: S/D:-1/Jk/1?_A9�Lot: Block: Section: Township: 'g/J Range: Lot Size: fi 7000 (Sq. Pt. or. Acres) Lot Location: Max Bedrooms: Listed below are the options available to you in designing your septic system. Choose the option that best fits your site. TRENCH BED W. DRAIN Dc t 1 t:o pipe o'tt0m(ft.) Gr.a 1 deptI (ft.) Total eptr (ft.) Gravel th (ft.) Gravel -e .gth (ft.) Tank ze. (g 1.) Soi)_ rating (s\q. ft./br) Gravel length 75 feet requires riultip l_e runs (not exceeding 75 feet each) ^% Tank must have at ].east two compartments I_ certify that: 1. I am familiar with the requirements for on-si_te sewers and wells as set forth by the Municipality of Anchorage(MOA) and the State of Alaska. 1) . I will install the system in accordance with all. MOA codes and regulations, and in compliance with the design criteria of this permit. 3. I will adhere to all. MOA and State of Alaska requirements for the set back distances from any existing well, wastewater disposal_ system or public sewerage system on this or any adjacent_ or nearby lot. 4, I understand that this permit is valid for the maximum number of bedroom stated above, and any enlargement or modification will require an additional permit. IF A LIFT STATION IS INSTALLED IN AN AREA COVERED BY MOA. BUILDING CODES, THEN (1) AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT AND INSPECTION MUST BE OBTAINED; (2) AS-BUILTS WILT, NOT BE APPROVED WITHOUT AN ELECTRICAL INSPECTION REPORT; AND (3) THE ELECTRICAL WORK MUST BZ D E.. BY sC'ENSED ELECTRICIAN. SIGNED --------- ---- --- -- — - DATE. - �--------- Applicant /� ISSUED BY SWP/024 r.ev.1/£35 (fire -f= /10©2 DATE ®URbIN DR iNq CO Mile 1.2, Lucas Road P.O. Box 871348 Wasilla, Alaska 99687 (907) 5 376 -WELL Name: Aurora Contracting g, Land Services Address:701 W. 58th City: Anchorage, Ax: 995181 Phone: 273-3769 Job Lot P. Sec 10, T12N, R4W Crew: R.Durb`Ln/S.Zacharia ��flna Beach) Date: August 4, 1986 Notes: Well drilled out to 100 ft.; casin pulled back to 75 ft. including 2 ft. stick-up. Set 15 -slot Johnson telescoping screen from 75-80 ft.(screen and extension :is 9 ft. long,) Static water level: 70 ft. from surface Depth Well Log 0-1 Topsoil _ 1-80 Brown sand 80-8 Clay and sand 83-1W Grav sand MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION FOR HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL OF ON-SITE SEWER AND WATER FACILITY H86-1350 264-4744 Application Date 1. GENERAL INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL) (a) Legal Description (include lot, block, subdivision, section, township, range) Parcel 1 Sandy Beach Subdivision (T12N R4W Section 10) Location (address or directions) 7811 Wandering Way (b) Property Owner Steven Miessner Telephone: Home 248-2700 Business Mailing Address 7811 Wandering Way, Anchorage, Alaska (c) Lending Institution Alaska Pacific Bank, Telephone 562-6100 Mailing Address PO Box 420, Anchorage, Alaska 99510 (d) Real Estate Company and Agent n/a Address Telephone (e) Mail the HAA to the following address: or: Check here RIK if hold for pick up. List contact person and day phone number below. 2. TYPE OF RESIDENCE Single -Family ®x Number of Bedrooms three (3 ) 3. WATER SUPPLY Individual Well Ox Community ❑ Public ❑ Note: If community well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environmental Conservation attesting to the legality and status. 4. SEWAGE DISPOSAL Onsite ❑ Public ❑ Community ❑ Holding Tank axx Note: If community well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environmental Conservation attesting to the legality and status. Page 1 of 2 72-025 (Rev 81881 Front J Al la► " �. 1 U z V; w U D: w N C] QZ J O Z Q Q: 0 N v a a: z z 0 U Oco— LJ r• V)Y�r W N W Q IT q Lj z< h� �0 U) V MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION FOR HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL t _l OF ON-SITE SEWER AND WATER FACILITY 264-4720 Application Date 1. GENERAL INFORMATION (a) Legal Description (include lot, block, subdivision, section, township, range) (u; Location (address or directions) 79 // Applicant Address 70 11 Telephone: Home 299'*27(,)D Business a (c) Applicant is (check one): Lending Institution ❑ ; Ider D-, Buyer ❑ ; Other ❑ (explain); (d) Lending Institution/Jk /keG _�/G � ��'✓�> � Telephone Address Re fox Z/ /�izrc�� ry^2c,2 , l9/C 99S/O (e) Real Estate Company and Agent /Yo%rp Address /t /GELD Telephone (f) Mail the HAA to the following address: 2. TYPE OF RESIDENCE Single -Family Multi -Family ❑ Other Number of Bedrooms 3. WATER SUPPLY / Individual Well 11X Community ❑ Public ❑ Note: If community well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environmental Conservation attesting to the legality and status. 4. SEWAGE DISPOSAL Onsite P Public ❑ Community ❑ Holding Tank ❑ Note: If community well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environmental Conservation attesting to the legality and status. 72-025 (1 tac) Page 1 of 2 5. ENGINEERING FIRM PROVIDI INSPECTIONS, TESTS, FILE SEARCH, D k AND INFORMATION As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I verify that my investigation of this Health Authority Approval shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is safe, functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. I further verify that based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is in compliance with all Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect on the date of this inspection. Name of Firm �� E�_' l X ' / - Telephone Address ,4& 99so 3 Date /ZfiS of A 4 StiBsc(lE/✓T j o i/�A /fAPC/c��/aM //�k5 ccl�E,�iLc-D ����;..•••••,.'� C TA/// INET/�'/E�i/�'/Es /N 71,1C i2lDC✓.A5/7 �V/C'ONM�NT�A% � %— vim: ;�r0 SYSl�N/ /.V S/- Z e C-0 cry TH/s' 000* /. ......yam. .......� OFT/G%ECIC/ES 9c'E OUTL!//EO /N T//� C�7T�7c TL' /s �TT/fC/TCD TO IM15 70 BC MMDEF a y A1141Cc/I ,�t'L4e7 7, //91,19 r C,0.,vD (i>os-tl.q /-- IESO giElaed� 9e I 4 E 0®�4 A %�t� u DHEP APPROVAL Approved for �" `' C`) bedrooms by `� �''"'� Date Disapproved Conditional �� Approved Terms of Conditional Approval /s, ma I.V cx , of 4 C,;W Zv� 1ss��. �F/ F� -•'cis Q=fMep� CAUTION <1_t� The Muncipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Environmental Protection (DHEP) issues Health Authority Approval certificates based solely upon the representations given in paragraph 5 above by an independent professional engineer registered in the State of Alaska. The DHEP does this as a courtesy to purchasers of homes and their lending institutions in order to satisfy certain federal and state requirements. Employees of DHEP do not conduct inspections or analyze data before a certificate is issued. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions in the professional engineer's work. Page 2 of 2 72-025 (11/84) D� 0ACN&RAv MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE (MOA) M���tGD� �NjA� pRo E��}oN HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL (HAA) pj' CHECKLIST - FEBRUARY 1984 Et��tRCNM " 264.4720 b, j U Legal Description: ��/ A. WELL DATA Well Classifications —_� ye Z-/ If A, 13, C, D.E.C. Approved (Y/N) O Well Log Present N) __�--- Date Completed — &4/�� Yield Total Depth Cased to 7S r Depth of Grouting _(&U //��C/ Static Water Level 70 — Pump Set At — %5/ Casing Height Above Ground — Electrical Wiring in Conduit CN) 17 / Sanitary Seal on Casing 6)N) Depression Around Wellhead (Y/b? Separation Distances from Well: To Septic/Holding Tank on Lot %�� ; On Adjoining Lots To Nearest Edge of Absorption Field on Lot 10O t On Adjoining Lots 10x3 6>/0PI To Nearest Public Sewer Line To Nearest Public Sewer Cleanout/Manhole _ IVI�A__— To Nearest Sewer Service Line on Lot Water Sample Collected by Date Water Sample Test Results Comments S'mr 6UM' B. SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK DATA Date Installed 0/0- 6- Size 1500 No. of Compartments g Standpipes ON) --Y — Air -tight Caps &N) Y Foundation Cleanout&/N) Depression over Tank (Y16) Date Last Pumped Pumping/Maintenance Contract on File (Y/N) 4411.1 ; for Holding Tank High -Water Alarm (Y/N) N111 Temporary Holding Tank Permit (Y/N) A�ZAI — Separation Distances from Septic/Holding Tank: i To Water -Supply Well /00 To Building Foundation To Property Line 45 To Disposal Field _ To Water Main/Service Line N14 To Stream, Pond, Lake, or Major Drainage Course &9 6-o Page Comments f ' ��1c3 rL SCG //Y�9/92//Gt�� •�"� llfll5 C�C� ( !r Page 1 of 2 19-roai i i,ua) s MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE MEMORANDUM DATE: October 31, 1986 TO: Vince Fennimore, Environmental Health, H&HS FROM: C--OAI-0� Karen Reddy, Insurance Administration, Risk Management SUBJECT: Insurance Requirements for New Septic System The manufacturer shall provide proof of the following 1. Comprehensive General Liability in the amount of 500,000 to include: Products/completed operations contractual liability 2. Manufacturers Warranty Bond in the amount of $60,000 to cover the specific warranties offered in this agreement. f Lr P 17 ,�� Uj Lru DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ANCHORAGE/WESTERN DISTRICT OFFICE 437 "E" STREET, SUITE 303 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 July 25, 1986 Alaska Environmental Control Services, Inc. 1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B Anchorage, Alaska 99503 BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPT. 2F74EA2533 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUBJECT: Ridwaste Environmental Systems, Parcel 1 SANDY BEACH SUBDIVISION, Anchorage, Alaska Dear Sir: [JUL 2 81986 RECEIVED We have reviewed your waiver and construction request on the subject property. Since the property is a single family residence, the Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) will be required to provide review and approval. Our department permits only multi—family and commercial properties. However, if DHHS so chooses, they may request a technical review and an application for a wastewater discharge permit through our office. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Anchorage/— Western District Office. Sincerely, Michael P. Lewis Environmental Engineer MPL:pkk cc: Susan Oswalt, DHHS ALASKA LdInOnMenTAL COnTnOL SCi-wICCS, Inc. Cngineerinq & Cnuironmenial Studies July 17,1986 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health & Human Services 825 L. Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Attn: Steve Morris Re: Ridwast:e Alternative Wastewater Treatment System Dear Steve: Enclosed find information that I hope will aid you in reviewing this innovative system. This packet is being submitted to Steve Eng at ADEC for review due to the proximity to Sand Lake. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call us. Sincerely, Steven F. Cords Civil Engineer 1200 West 33rd Ruenue. Suite B • Anchorogc. Alaska 99503 • (907) 561-5040 ALASKA CIIUPOWnTAL COM-ROL SNUIUS, X. Cngineerinq & 6nuironmenlol Studies July 17, 1986 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Anchorage/Western District Off, 437 E. Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Attn: Steve Eng Re: Parcel 1, Sandy Beach Subdivision Dear Steve: Enclosed find information which will hopefully assist you in your review of this project. Identical information is being submitted to Steve Morris with the Municipality of Anchorage, Department of Health & Human Services for review. The proposed Ridwaste Environmental System will provide primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment for domestic wastewater. The final effluent is proposed to be discharged to a subsurface absorption area. Disinfection with photozone (activated air) will be constant to insure good quality effluent. Parcel 1 is a small lot but suitable soil has been found making it possible to develop. A percolation test revealed a soil rating of 62 square feet per bedroom. The design has been based on 125 square feet per bedroom as a safety factor, Sieve analysis shows the soil will provided adequate filtering for subsurface disposal. Based on the above facts, enclosed documents, and your own sound professional judgement, we request that you waive the separation distance of 100 feet from Sand Lake to the septic tank and disposal area to 69 and 60 feet respectively, for this particular. property. Disinfection and proper maintenance should insure that no health hazard will be induced if this waiver is granted. Please review the enclosed data carefully and if you have any questions please call us at 561-5040. Sincerely, I�e7 7' Steven F. Cords Civil Engineer Approve by: 1 Ehclosures 1200 West 33rd Auenue. Suite B • Anchorcge_ Alosko 99503 •!90?l 551-5040 ALASKA bUlnOn ETAL COnTROL SMUS, X. �ngmeerinq & Enuironmenlal Studies July 17, 1986 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Anchorage/Western District Off. 437 E. Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Attn: Steve Eng Re: Ridwaste Environmental Systems, Inc. - Alternative Wastewater Treatment System Dear Steve: Enclosed find information concerning performance and operation of this innovative wastewater treatment system. This data seems to be comprehensive enough to indicate the system performs well and produces high quality effluent for various modes of discharge; surface, stream, etc. Tom Graham & Associates, Inc. plan to carry out testing on the first unit using different types of disinfection. Installation without disinfection is not planned. This should give a very good indication of the flexibility of this unit. The literature included here and on file with your office should aid you in reviewing this system. Hopefully enough information has been included to enable you to complete your review expeditiously. Should you have any questions on this subject, please feel free to call us at 561-5040. Sincerely, Steven F. Cords Civil Engineer Approved by: -r Enclosur s 1200 West 33rd kenue. Jule S • Aneho-oge. Q.Ioska 99503 •(907) 561-5040 ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL. SERVICES, INC. 1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 (907)581.5040 JOB - c; _ __ _-m Aly � / c. A%1— ? SHEET NO --_--- OF CALCULATED BY �F C/, F'l>S DATE CHECKED BY DATE — " 3U SCALE— •o •e -/'� Z—:: FLA Il �e�9o•e ose- e. e •o -she "- `- — •• a ei• �s�i6 �.. ese•� • C. REID, J o: /S 2251 e� w U� Pte' ^•,. •...• e'�tb�� EXi/lam/T� / CAUTION The Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issues Health Authority Approval certificates based only upon the representations given in paragraph 5 above by an independent professional engineer registered in the State of Alaska. The DHHS does this as a courtesy to purchasers of homes and their lending institutions in order to satisfy certain federal and state requirements. Employees of DHHS do not conduct inspections or analyze data before a certificate is issued. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or Omissions in the professional engineer's work. Page 2 of 2 • L G' 72-025 lRev 6/86) Beck N f=1PE AItJIwG WoL-L- 4 .• I 4 a 0F�q��`a� F� •. n••.YH1 N•�...Y... Y•o WYY.Y ,� CRAIG L. SAVAGE: �• �• `�r�•e 4538.5 •n`��. ff�� rb. .•NM.C•,,�7u0 Gvts* Wir vS — -f-Io C-� ,4PPROX. WATERS r^nr_ IC CORNEFRS SET THIS DATE I hereby certify that I have performed a Mortgagee's inspec- tion of the following described propeny: _ LOT ► , S6fJO--( 1�EG�GI-1 SUE -;)DI V 1!--7 10 iJ Anchorage Recording District, Alaska, and that the irnprovements situated thereon are within the property lines and do not overlap or encroach on the property lying adjacent thereto, that no improvements on property lying adjacent thereto encroach on the premises in question and that there are no roadways, transmission lines or other visible easements on said propeny except as indicated hereon. Dated at Anchorage, Alaska PARCELCONTAINS 10F?3 S.r f this—I-2--L�' _day of JUI_ 19iL( EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OTHER.THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT, ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. HEWI LOUNSBURY & ASSOCIATES Engineers, Surveyors & Planners ,5XH/i3 / 7- (ENGIN 'R'S SEAL) s Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES �� ) 825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST \ PERFORMED FOR: / �1' r6CLf-I DATE PERFORMED: j J 4 ` IC(86 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 5o n6ki ttz�VCav� p�vt t Township, Range, Section: S e [ /U T L -N !z y(4J SLOPE SITE PLAN �T I E l )I -- 1 _ i I Ol_ ort�un�t Sa�� l� 2-' 4 N 6 a P� 7 - 8 9 14- 15 c } u 16 SND 17 18- 19- Reading 819 Reading Date Gross Time Net Time 10 - Net Drop WAS GROUND WATER �• l; 31:15 • ENCOUNTERED? KO It 11 ° S �- L t e IF YES, AT WHAT O ` DEPTH? P Q/ 12 - E y .s 13 t r e' Oe th to Wale r At V v M nitering? 10 /TOai te:; 149 86 3 0 3 3 qS- - O NNW ! :.35'00 — .60 MEEM "36 00 Flo Lo MEMO INN Eml 14- 15 c } u 16 SND 17 18- 19- Reading 819 Reading Date Gross Time Net Time 10 - Net Drop WAS GROUND WATER �• l; 31:15 • ENCOUNTERED? KO It 11 ° S �- L t e IF YES, AT WHAT O ` DEPTH? P Q/ 12 - E y .s 13 t r e' Oe th to Wale r At V v M nitering? 10 /TOai te:; 149 86 14- 15 c } u 16 SND 17 18- 19- Reading 819 Reading Date Gross Time Net Time Depth to Water Net Drop J07 3 l; 31:15 y .60 -2 7 /-'A3 3u ,, 3 0 3 3 qS- - O ! :.35'00 — .60 "36 00 Flo Lo 20- 1 PERCOLATION RATE -< (minutes/inch) PERC HOLE DIAMETER TEST RUN BETWEEN 'S^ — FT AND S �_ FT COMMENTS PERFORMED BY: AG(- S' tiT rr-6 0 y f �' ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EF 72-008 (Rev. 4/85) ye CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ON THIS DATE. DATE: h W3 GSH1011 41 G /`1 UNIFIED SYSTEM ASTM D-2487 07/03/86 SANDY BEACH PARCEL: 1 SAMPLE IDENTITY 86-1 PASSING 0200 SIEVE: 5.40% PASSING # 40 SIEVE: 69.80% PASSING # 10 SIEVE: 98.70% PASSING # 4 SIEVE: 99.20% PASSING 1/2 IN SIEVE: 100.00% PASSING 3/4 IN SIEVE: 100.00% PASSING 1 INCH SIEVE: 100.00% PASSING 2 INCH SIEVE: 100.00% PASSING 3 INCH SIEVE: 100.00% D10 IS 0.10 MM. D30 IS 0.22 MM. D60 IS 0.36 MM. THE LIQUID LIMIT IS UNKNOWN THE PLASTIC LIMIT IS UNKNOWN THE PLASTICITY INDEX IS UNKNOWN CU = 3.60 CC = 1.344 THE SOILS ARE COARSE GRAINED SANDY SOILS BORDERLINE SOILS RETAINED: 64.40% RETAINED: 28.90% RETAINED: 0.50% RETAINED: 0.80% RETAINED: 0.00% RETAINED: 0.00% RETAINED: 0.00% RETAINED: 0.00% RETAINED: 0.00% THE SOILS ARE POORLY GRADED SAND.(SP) 07/03/86 SANDY BEACH TESTHOLE - 86-1 SAMPLE DEPTH = 5.5 ------------------------------------- PERCENT PASSING #200 SIEVE 5.4 PERCENT PASSING #100 SIEVE 24.1 PERCENT PASSING # 60 SIEVE 62.1 PERCENT PASSING # 40 SIEVE 69.8 PERCENT PASSING # 20 SIEVE 97.5 PERCENT PASSING # 10 SIEVE 98.7 PERCENT PASSING # 4 SIEVE 99.2 PERCENT PASSING 1/2 IN SIEVE 100.0 PERCENT PASSING 3/4 IN SIEVE 100.0 PERCENT PASSING 1 INCH SIEVE 100.0 PERCENT PASSING 2 INCH SIEVE 100.0 PERCENT PASSING 3 INCH SIEVE 100.0 ------------------------------------- ALASKA 6MIROMN f AL LOCI I IDOL "'L Engineerinq & Cnuironmenlal Sludies !FYIV1,F1r '#0G TEST HOLE NO. �(✓ Date Legal Description_ 7A�1/Dy ���f� �u�0., �'�2GEs'G Sample Depth D 1090 D 3090 Ada D 60906 Comments Reported to Plotted Checked by Approved by ,�cxH/B/T ;0�'3 Municipality of Anchorage ov�t DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST —4 �tivolr5�> F3't sAiS 1 e ° 60 o Bruce D. Patterson CE 5034 0 �2;'�° av PERFORMED FOR: AURORA CONTRACTORS DATE PERFORMED:_ LOT ]. PARCEL 1 SANDY BEACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: STJBD Township, Range, Section: SLOPE SITE PLAN DEPTH FEET) 1 1,0' ORGANIC"S (PT) _ 2 3 4.0' 4 5 6 7 8 9- 10- 11.0 11 12 s 13 14 15 16 17 18- 19- OLIVE 819 LIGHT BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) DRY OLIVE FINE SILTY SAND FIRM -1 (SM) WAS GROUND WATER NO ENCOUNTERED? S L IF YES, AT WHATC DEPTH? — P E Depth to Water Atter Monitoring? Date: BOTTOM OF TESTHOLE Net Time . SONE= Net Drop Hour ® Rimini,MEM"s 10-10-85 10:15 III :25 10 Min. 1.99 .13 10.35 10 Min. ]1 2=2.32 .12 Q Min. 10 Min.1 Min. ■ NJ ■ (SM) WAS GROUND WATER NO ENCOUNTERED? S L IF YES, AT WHATC DEPTH? — P E Depth to Water Atter Monitoring? Date: BOTTOM OF TESTHOLE Reading Date Gross Time Net Time . SONE= Net Drop Hour ® Rimini,MEM"s 10-10-85 10:15 III :25 10 Min. 1.99 .13 Reading Date Gross Time Net Time Depth to Water Net Drop Hour S turation Period 10-10-85 10:15 1.86 :25 10 Min. 1.99 .13 10.35 10 Min. ]1 2=2.32 .12 Q Min. 10 Min.1 Min. 20 6" PERCOLATION RATE , $' 3 (minutes inch) PERC HOLE DIAMETER TEST RUN BETWEEN 5e FT AND 6 — FT COMMENTS 250 SQUARE. FEET OF DRAINAGE AREA REQUIRED PER BEDROOM — PERFORMED BY: MARK K T ZDHN5ON I 10-10-85 CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN 10-10-85 _.._.. ... __. _.. .........,,.. .,., .., „no mice ini cccc CT nti THIA nATF DATE: -': ALASKA CIIJIU01MAL COnTROL SekQI S, InC. Engineerinq & Enuironmenlol Sludies 511-11917- SPECIFICATIONS X8191T SPECIFICATIONS FOR A TRENCH—TYPE WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM— PARCEL 1, SANDY BEACH SUBDIVISION 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 THE, DRAWINGS, SHEETS 1 THROUGH 4, SHALL BE A PART OF THIS SPECIFICATION. 1.2 ALI, MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), THE CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT, AND ALL APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS CURRENTLY IN EFFECT. 1.3 ALL ELEVATIONS AND DEPTHS ARE ADVISORY, AND ARE TO BE VERIFIED OR MODIFIED IN THE FIELD BY A DHHS APPROVED INSPECTOR. 1.4 IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLER TO ADHERE TO APPROVED DESIGNS FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTAIN THE; SPECIFIED SEPARATION DISTANCES, AND HAVE THE APPROPRIATE INSPECTIONS. 1.5 IF THE INSTALLATION IS NOT INSPECTED BY AN AECS ENGINEER, AECS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. AN ENGINEER AT AECS SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS TIIAT WILL BE REQUIRED AND TO EXPLAIN WHAT THESE INSPECTIONS WILL INVOLVE. 2,0 AERATED SEPTIC TANK 2.1 THE SEPTIC TANK SHALL MEET ALL UPC STANDARDS FOR TWO—COMPARTMENT TANKS, CONSTRUCTED OF FIBEsRGLASS, SET LEVEL, AND INSULATED WITH AN OVERLYING LAYER OF 2—INCH BURIAL TYPE RIGID BOARD POLYSTYRENE INSULATION. THE SEPTIC TANK SHALL REST ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. 2.2 THE SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET FROM THE HOUSE FOUNDATION, AND A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM THE ABSORPTION AREA. 2.3 THE SEPTIC TANK AND TRENCH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 100 FEET FROM ANY PRIVATE WELL OR BODY OF WATER, 150 FEET FROM CLASS C WELLS, AND 200 FEET FROM CLASS A OR B WELLS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. LESS THAN THE REQUIRED SEPARATION DISTANCE TO CLASS A,B, OR C WELLS MUST HAVE PRIOR APPROVAL OR WAIVER BY ALASKA DEPARTMENT OP ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 1200 Wesl 33rd Auenue. Swe B • Anchorage. Alaska 99503 9 (907) 561-50U0 3.0 (ADEN - 2.4 PIPING SHALL BE FITTED WITH A MECHANICAL WATERTIGHT CALDER COUPLING ON THE OUTLET AND INLET AND STANDPIPES TO THE SEPTIC TANK. PIPING SHALL BE 4 --INCH ASTM D3034 OR CAST IRON, SLOPED A MINIMUM OF 1/4 INCH PER FOOT, 2 PERCENT, WITH A MINIMUM 4 FEET OF COVER. 2.5 CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DESIGNATED, CAPPED WITH AIR -TIGHT RAIN CAPS (JIM CAPS OR EQUIVALENT), AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. 2.6 PIPING FROM THE HOUSE TO THE TANK AND FROM THE TANK TO THE ABSORPTION AREA SHALL BE INSULATED WITH AT LEAST TWO (2) INCHES OF POLYSTYRENE RIGID BOARD INSULATION SUITABLE FOR BURIAL. PIPES SHALT. BE HEAT TRACED WITH A SELF-LIMITING HEAT TRACE RATED AT 2-4 WATTS/FOOT, AT 110-120 VAC, 20 AMPS MAXIMUM CIRCUIT BREAKER. 2.7 WIRING FOR LIFT PUMP AND ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SHALL MEET NEC & NEMA -4 STANDARDS FOR UNDERGROUND & WET ENVIRONMENTS. ALL ELECTRICAL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED BY A MOA APPROVED OR MOA LICENSED ELECTRICIAN. ABSORPTION AREA 3.1 THE GRAVEL FOR THE TRENCH SHALL BE 0.5 TO 2.5 INCH, SCREENED ROCK WITH LESS THAN 3% PASSING ##200 SIEVE RESIDUAL. ALI, SUBSTITUTES MUST HAVE PRIOR DHHS APPROVAL. 3.2 THE BOTTOM AND SIDES OF THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE RAKED WITH THE BACKHOE BLADE TO INSURE THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN COMPACTED DURING EXCAVATION. THE BOTTOM ELEVATION SHALL BE LEVEL. 3.3 MONITOR STANDPIPE(S) SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS, AND SHALL BE RIGID PVC ASTM D3034, OR 4 INCH CAST IRON. THE SECTION SHOWN WITH HOLES MAY BE 0.5 INCH HOLES DRILLED ON 6 -INCH CENTERS ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE PIPE, OR A REGULAR SECTION OF PERFORATED SEWER PIPE, CLAMPED TO A SOLID SECTION, WITH EITHER A NO HUB COUPLING OR A SOLVENT JOINT. A RUBBER RAIN CAP (JIM CAP OR EQUIVALENT) SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER THE TOP OF THE PIPE. 3.4 THE DISTRIBUTION PIPE SHALI, BE 4 INCH RIGID PVC WITH A MINIMUM CRUSH STRENGTH OF 1500 LBS. ALL DISTRIBUTION PIPES SHALL BE LAID LEVEL. 3.5 TRENCHES MAY BE PARALLELED, BUT MUST HAVE A MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN THE TRENCHES OF 10 FEET OR 2 TIMES THE GRAVEL DEPTH (WHICHEVER IS GREATER). 75 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED LINEAR LENGTH OF ANY TRENCH. 3.8 IF THE FINAL GRADE OVER THE TRENCH IS LESS THAN 4 FEET ABOVE THE GRAVEL, INSULATION IS REQUIRED, USING BURIAL TYPE POLYSTYRENE RIGID BOARD. THERE SHALL BE 1 INCH OF INSULATION FOR EVERY FOOT OF SOIL LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 4 FEET OF COVER, BUT THERE MUST BE AT LEAST 24 INCHES OF SOIL COVER EVEN THOUGH INSULATION IS USED. 3.7 IF INSULATION IS NOT NECESSARY, THE GRAVEL SHALL BE COVERED WITH A LAYER OF NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (SUCH AS MIRAFAI, FIBRETEX 200 GRADE, POLY -FILTER X OR EQUIVALENT). 3.8 DISINFECTION SHALL BE WITH PHOTOZONE OR MICROCHEM WASTEWATER DISINFECTION SYSTEM WHICH USES CHLORINE TABLETS, WITH AUTO TIMER. UNIT SHALL BE PLUMBED FOR DISINFECTION BETWEEN RIDWASTE PACKAGE PLANT & SOIL ABSORPTION AREA. 3.9 IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE AREA EXCAVATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE TRENCH SHOULD BE PLANTED WITH A WHITE CLOVER, RED FESCUE MIX, OR KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS. 4,0 INSPECTIONS 4.1 A MINIMUM OF TWO INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE TRENCH. THE FIRST INSPECTION WILL BE OF THE OPEN EXCAVATION TO VERIFY THAT INSTALLATION WILL BE IN THE PROPER SOIL, AND ADHERES TO APPROVED DESIGN DIMENSIONS. 4.2 THE SECOND INSPECTION WILL BE AFTER PLACEMENT OF THE GRAVEL, MONITOR STANDPIPE AND DISTRIBUTION PIPE TO VERIFY PROPER INSTALLATION BEFORE BACKFILL. 4.3 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS WILL BE MADE BY A MOA APPROVED OR A MOA LICENSED ELECTRICIAN INSPECTION. 5. ENGINEERING FIRM PROVIDING INSPECTIONS, TESTS, FILE SEARCH, DATA AND INFORMATION As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I verify that my investigation of this Health Authority Approval shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is safe, functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. I further verify that based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is in compliance with all Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect on the date of this inspection. Name of Firm Address Date 6. DHHS APPROVAL Approved for 3 Telephone Engineer's Seal bedrooms by Date / — �/ — 8C) Approved Disapproved 'Terms of Conditional Approval Conditional CAUTION The Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issues Health Authority Approval certificates based only upon the representations given in paragraph 5 above by an independent professional engineer registered in the State of Alaska. The DHHS does this as a courtesy to purchasers of homes and their lending institutions in order to satisfy certain federal and state requirements. Employees of DHHS do not conduct inspections or analyze data before a certificate is issued. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions in the professional engineer's work. Page 2 of 2 72-0261Rev 8/661 Beck :<c C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA i Soils Rating in Absorption Strata Type of System Design Date Date Installed ���' Length of Field Width of Field ( Depth of Field Gravel Bed Thickness Square Feet of Absorption Area 5 % Standpipes Present#)N) r Depression over Field (YO _ �% Date of Last Adequacy Test NI/_//� uaw Onv�iz/falC�r/� Results of Last Adequacy Test AYIA Separation Distance from Absorption Field: To Water -Supply Well 4�0 _ To Property Line To Building Foundation // Lot On Adjoining Lots To Existing or Abandoned System on 7p 1..t To Water Main/Service Line T/1 To Cutbank (if present) _ 014 To Stream/Pond/Lake/or Major Drainage Course &D To Driveway, Parking Area, or Vehicle Storage Area &:T/: f Comments (%-0// 41CI D. LIFT STATION Date Installed Size in Gallons "Pump On" Level at .— High Water Alarm Level at Tested for Electrical Codes (YLN)__� ° Dimensions Manhole/, p Off' Level at Vent(Y/N) Pumping Cycles during Adequacy Test. Meets MOA ** Check Permitted Bedroom Rating Against HAA Request ** I certify that I have checked, verified, or conformed to all MOA and HAA guidelines in effect on the date of this inspection. Signed Company Receipt No. (a00f Pio/S Date MOA No. !,*e QF A�sn/y®`'� u sa f1j , 0 999 . !c Date of Payment Amount: $ e r' I. ° o LF.Ro . RE 1D JR. s ! -'on/2iT/arV4L _5-11Z356V&efAvT To ;114/1 f�l�/'C/C�)T/cA � •, 2251 °,° ��61 //VSI�IC'T/O^/ f!/a5 .��/c�LEO C�2TTi/•t/ DST/C/SNC/Cs � ��'� •" �`�, a� Page 2 of 2 IN /7-/C le/D/rt//t5� E7VP110CN/i/&NT<�G �'YST i�1 irt/STA�LEi �i�lQf�S�s��Xv'�,�� UrV T/1C--5c 7z-026(1vaa) /N 4A/0 /S X7771 C'f/GV JZ T/%!s s o '/��L/, VrY 1�cG= TzMAO 13 Y � f�L =f=0 U'N n FIDE - vU I W i2Os 4 OF A eco 04 �! �- g i h`'vj t �et.1•�..N.........o N..e •• C �< :.CRAIG L. SAVAGE:• C el • r 4538-5 'a V.ht.a•a'a` PARCELCONTAINS EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OTHER.THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT, ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. DEpr. Lli% OF h�H A eNVIRO"4 OF HEALTH OnAGc MENTAL PP,0IECr1QN " 1986 RECEIVED \q"/ VAna,l1 t' wI.}ti-�- o � tires AS -BUILT' 0 CORNERS SET THIS DATE I hereby certify that I have performed a Mortgagee's inspec- tion of the following described property: LOT I i�eaGu �U�DI V I� I oN Anchorage Recording District, Alaska, and that the improvements situated thereon are within the property lines and do not overlap or encroach on the property lying adjacent thereto, that no improvements on property lying adjacent thereto encroach on the premises in question and that there are no roadways, transmission lines or other visible casements on said property except as indicated hereon. Dated at Anchorage, Alaska this=L17� day of QUI— 19 _ HEW]' V. LOUNSBURY & ASSOCIATES Engineers, Surveyors & Planners ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC:. 1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 (907) 561.5040 14BS0,-ePr1o11 l9eEA -- SHEET NO - _ -/- OF CALCULATED BY.__� GO!�OS DATE --Z/ 9 CHECKED BY- BV_ DATE - SCALE EXN/FiT 0 S pA%A - BE�PC�4// s/NCr�E FAM/GY /��/E�G/•V<� CAZL-5 ; e>;eAV4-Z. O�R71 ¢e /M<WzE:i5 0. s S� G �A(C Tf/ Z/5ED FeDM AVA/GA:BG4er G EiV<-lTil .141-0�II ._ lA�lcy�/r or v��c c. �A�/mss FOe �PD�OS�D W�zZZ- e TH/,S G or, 2EG 4N%''lEa�lD /SDU GAc�aN .e/IaN�A.�T� ?�Cl7 /�GAniT' W= F�pNj PW5 MAMUAG OF s�5PT/C rAN& P,eAerleC-, 00 ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL JOB- `w'_c_, CONTROL SERVICES, INC. SHEET ND _ ._ —Z _ DF 1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 CALCULATED BY SF Go�DS DATE S� (907) 561.5040 DATE CHECKED BY--- SCALE Y- SCALE TkEA/CH. PG A Al 1i /sooP�llarr (rnin.) R/DWA5?6 PKC. rPcArMr1vr /iNir 0 0 4 (Pvc ) 4 o Gl/G A ST[NI D 3034 - Z's' l__ P/STC'iF'Ur1o" 4/, C'L.EXIn/OG/� f15Tn'/ 1> 3e 9" 45rly P-3494 C` N D T Misr, 4/nim, , AsrM r---304-74 HANCOK (02 E441AL) I ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL ,DB___ �= _l5A /V CONTROL SERVICES, INC. SHEET NO�- 1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 CALCULATED BY (907) 561.5040 _ CHECKED BY- DATE SCALE N 7-:5 / C4EAniaur wl,PA/N rmyHr cAP 4"IV01D ?-VGvsrre6�/E INsuc,arioN /Z`""' i4r— C/Cr/N��IZ//(l� (mAX� - Z� / t i IQ � SC��/c�I3 4,ei�l VEL o rr�E'N cN Pzot-i �.� r Y/?/ CA e— ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. 1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 (907) 561.5040 JOB—O4'C�-,r/�_------ SHEET No.—--^---�---- — OF--� CALCULATED 8Y 5 GAS DATE CHECKED BY AA DATE SCALE-- 1VT5 �•� i'eENCk S65747'/0M rYA/ CA c. zAlw r16Hr eA P �r.1/M'C'AP DR c-0t/AL,1 /o Pvc A /,I o 3034 /Z"min / FH r> i'fr"ZQo�J VA: Q In E=AST of (-Rc1=, Q 9 0 0 z 7 • s9' oo� �. izi.ds' ) � p "•t 'N St�CiLE F��a�LY 3o.R 1 9 • W \ � • T � Vi u y AS -BUILT CERTIFICATE: I hereby certify that I have surveyed the following described property: s� A A �t �A� r:::,t _ and that no encroachments exist except as indicated. EXCLUSION NOTE: It is the responsibility of the owner to determine the existence of any easements, covenants, or restrictions which do not appear on the recorded subdivision plat. Under no circumstance should any data hereon be used for constuction or for extablishing boundary or fence lines. • GE Atf B3' KURTZ - ° . LS -6297 .'; AGUA FRIA SURVEYORS •••°•• > 1417 West Northern Lights ®oulevard Anchoroge, Alouka 93503 276-6151 E5•8(, 1Scale I"=3o 1 Grld zz2I. IWO 86-5( Two parcels of land 12 North, Range 4 West, particularly described as Of . G � .M: 'J #al located within the NW 1/4 NW 1/4 section 10, Township Seward Meridian, Alaska, with Parcel 1 being more follows: Commencing at the brass cap monument which marks the corner oocmpn to Sections 3, 4, 9 and 10, thence S89052156"E along the north boundary of Section 10 a distance of 660.45 feet; thence SO°06'00"E along the west boundary of Sandy Beach Subdivision, recorded July 24, 1950 in the Anchorage Recording District as Plat P-184, a distance of 159.81 feet to the iron pipe which marks the southwest corner of Lot 5 of said Sandy Beach Subdivision; thence continuing SO°06'00"E a distance of 500.98 feet to the iron pipe which marks the southwest corner of Int 1 of said Sandy Beach Subdivision, and the True Point of Beginning of Parcel 1; thence S89059'00"E along the south boundary of said Lot 1 a distance of 121.05 feet; thence S13°35'43"E a. distance of 49x31 feet; thence S78°28'00"W a distance of 135.24 feet, thence NO°06'00"W a distance of 75.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning of Parcel 1 and containing 7,872 square feet; and with Parcel 2 being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of Parcel 1 described above and the True Point of Beginning of Parcel 2; thence S89°59100"E a distance of 52.00 feet more or less to the meander line of Sand Lake; thence S2030'29"E along said meander line a distance of 39.35 feet; thence S78028100"W a distance of 43.00 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said Parcel 1; thence N13135143"W along the east boundary of said Parcel 1 a distance of 49.31 feet to the True Point of Beginning of Parcel 2, and containing 2,082 square feet, more or less. /.2 �bnlarc /x/'6- �:�� Qr Ae k ��p••YY••e YYY• S �A O 1 •6 IO �Y , ", `YY% 14 49th t �• •• eee•Y•te+ •Y�•aae'Ysoe.•Y e•e •Yee eoY• Ya•a eoe i4 eCRAIG L. SAVAGE �/�°�% 4538-S°Nn� n �1•�/' �sff,� T/fig/ �(oC?.'a �J. DLfT a 5-C)(o 4�zo�Erc� t I i f 1 ) i / i I I n �1•�/' 'klt rhe%f--' '7r-i.'./iyl �(oC?.'a �J. a t i f 1 i I r CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC 1 '10 5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FEDERAL TAX ID # 92.0040440 LASORATOPIES ;( � �"11)' I � I . . . x flfOl Z-- - - - - - - - - ja! 1 % -.ilii.C C , r 1 +`C: ;.A 1; ij J o i j lJij lf! 1 Fwj' )fig/ n) Inc Z-- - - - - - - - - ja! 1 % CHEMICAL IC - = 5633 S STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99516 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FEDERAL TAX ID 8 92-0040440 •h jJ 'IP414 A 'u'l T,l is 6 Im— nm/ NO P lj 0! CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC 5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 IT A gBOR AT ORR I E S�\l FEDERAL TAX ID # 92-0040440 CHEMICAL GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC. 5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FEDERAL TAX ID ## 92-0040440 IABOR/TO RHES HEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC. 5633 B STREET • ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 • TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 Client PO# : VERBAL Req #: Client Smpl ID: SAND LAKE Sample Recd APR 20 87 Ordered By TON GRAHAM REPORTS ADDRESS #1 AK TECHNOLOGICAL RE'P'LICATIONS, INC. 1707 EAGLE RIVER RD EAGLE RIVER, AK. 99577 Special Instruct: Chemlab Ref #: 5984 Lab Smpl ID: I Parameter Tested AK TECH APPLkWATERS BANK BODS RESIDUE:NON-FILTERABLE(S5) pH FECAL COLIFORM NITROGEN: AMMONIA NITROGEN: KJELDAHL NITROGEN: NITRATE NITROGEN: NITRITE ANALYSIS REPORT BY SAMPLE Matrix: Water Result Units Met od ------------------------------- n/.a n/a 164 mg/1 33 mg/l 7.9 units GT 20.006 col/100 ml 40 mg/l 58 mg/l NO (0 JO) mg/l ND (0.01) mg/l Sample SAMPLE COLLECTED 4-20-87, 1045 HRS BY J.M. MONTGOMERY Remarks: ENGINEERS. Invoice No. : 129 Client Account : AKTECHT Date Report Printed: APR 28 87 @ 18:15 Released By REPORTS ADDRESS 02 Detection Limits 0,10 Allowable Limits n/a ? Tests Per{armed + See Special Instructions Above =PP CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA., INC. 5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FEDERAL TAX ID 0 92-0040440 1 GHOF/t0 F1E ti CHEMICAL& GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC 5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FEDERAL TAX ID # 92-0040440 J 5633 B STREET ANCFIORAGE, ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FEDERAL TAX ID � 92-0040440 [fir, p A p f- , A 7, ri Flif" �j I MCl/ CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC 5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FEDERAL TAX ID # 92-0040440 jiji 1"j, I-.;, h fP funi it ! I fo, 1/ i'1 ,- -n-.! lo 3T- 1) 2 hf .1- fll111 CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC. 5633 B STREET • ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 • TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 LABORATORIES Client P'D# : VERBAL Req #: Client Smpl ID: SAND LAKE Sample Recd : APR 20 87 Ordered By : TOM GRAHAM REPORTS ADDRESS #1 AK TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, INC, 1707 EAGLE RIVER RD EAGLE RIVER, AK. 99`77 ' Special Instruct: Chemlab Ref #: 5984 Lab Smpl ID: i Parameter Tested -------------------------------------- AK TECH ADPL*WATERS BANK BODj RESIDUE:MON-FILTERABLE(S5; pH FECAL COLIFORM NITROGEN: AMMONIA NITROGEN: K::JELMHIL NITROGEN: NITRATE NITROGEN: NITRITE ANALYSIS REPORT BY SAMPLE Invoice No. 129 Client Account : AKTECHT Date Report Printed: APR 28 87 @ 18:15 Released By REPORTS ADDRESS #2 latrix: Nater Detection R..es It Units Method Limits n/a n/a 164 mg/l 3:3 mg/l 7.'7 units T 2i!,n(o col/100 mi 40 mg/l 58 m^,/1 idB (ir,10) mg/l 0.10 "iD (0,01) ma/1 ;ample SAje, COLLECTED 4-20-87, 1045 HRS BY I.M..MONTG0MERY Remarks; ENGINEERS. Allowable Limits n/a -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Se i G_Y= _. .`l !!"� # See Special nstructirns Above €�ta'T,nle A�7' CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC.ANCHORAGE INDUSTRIAL CENTER 5633 6 STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 ,aoR .oa,Es TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 •►: Y • C'JI'�:i CLIENT AK Technological Applications Inc. CLIENT P. 0. r -- ADDRESS 1707 Eagle River Rd. SAMPLES RECEIVED: 4/6/87 Eagle River, AK 99577 SAMPLES COIEECTED: 4/6/87 REFER QUESTICN TO: Daniel J. Bacon DATE ANALYZED: 4/7 - 4/13/87 APPROVED BY: Stephen C. Ede j�/ LAB SAMPLE NO. 5849 CLIENT SAMPLE I.D.: Sand Lake, from filter MATRIX: Water m=OD: Standard Methods, 16th Edition DADAMCTCD Ammonia -N, mg/1 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, mg/l Nitrate -N, mg/1 Nitrite -N, mg/1 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, mg/1 Suspended Solids, mg/l Fecal Coliform, col/100 ml pH GT = GREATER THAN RESIDUAL SAMPLES WILL BE HELD UNTIL: Not Held RESULTS 58 69 NO (0.10) NO (0.01) 225 40 GT 19800,000 8.2 ND = NONE DETECTED DEI`ECTION LEI LIT IN ( ) INVOICE r 5849 LABORATORIES CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC. 5633 B STREET • ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 • TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FEDERAL TAX ID 92-0040440 CLIENT ACCT�w AKTECHT TESTS PERFORMED INYOICE 5763 CLIEHT POO: -- 1 _ DATE: 4/2/87 CLIENT: AK Technological Applications SEND REPORTS TO: Pick Up. e 1707 Eagle River Rd. Eagle River, AK 99577 AS PER QUOTE $145.00 TELEPHONE (907) 563-3117/562-2560 TELEPHONE SHIPPED YIA ❑ MAIL ❑ COURIER ® HOLD FOR PICK-UP ❑ OTHER -- QTY TESTS PERFORMED UNIT COST TOTAL COST 1 Nitrate -N, Nitrite-Pl, Kjeldahl -N, pH, Suspended Solids, Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Fecal Coliform AS PER QUOTE $145.00 SPECIAL REMARKS: Sand Lake Tom Graham A.��` ; -_ce CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC. ' ANCFIORAGE INDUSTRIAL CENTER 5633 8 STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 ineoanro hies - TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 ANALYTICAL REPORT CLIENT AK Technological Applications, Inc. CLIENT p. 0. # ADDRESS 1707 Eagle River Rd. SAMPLES RECEIVED Eagle River, AK 99577 SAMPLES COLLECTED: Tom Graham RE'F'ER QUESTION TO: Daniel J. Bacon APPROVED BY: Stephen C. Ede 3/26/87 3/26/87 1155 DATE ANALYZED: 3/26 - 3/31/87 M/ LAB SAMPLE NO. 5763 CLIENT SAMPLE I.D.: Sand Lake by TSG MATRIX: Water METHOD: Standard Methods for the Analysis of Water and Waste Water Nitrogen Ammonia, mg/l 40 Nitrogen Kjeldahl, mg/l 61 Nitrogen Nitrate, mg/l ND (0.10) Nitrogen Nitrite, mg/l NO (0.10) NOTE: Kjeldahl nitrogen includes ammonia nitrogen; to obtain organic nitrogen, subtract ammonia nitrogen from kjeldahl nitrogen. RESIDUAL SAMPLES WILL BE HELD UNTIL: Not Held ND = NONE DETECTED DETECTION LIMIT RT ( ) INVOICE # 5763 CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC. '� ANCHORAGE INDUSTRIAL CENTER 5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 lApOpATOli1E5 ANALYTICAL REPORT CLIENT AK Technological Applications, Inc. _CLIENT P. 0. n Tom Graham ADDRESS 1707 Eagle River Rd. SAMPLES RECEIVED: 3/26/87 Eagle River, AK 99577 SAMPLES COLLECTED: 3/26/87 1045 REFER QUESTION TO: Daniel J. Bacon DATE ANALYZED: 3/26 - 3/31/87 APPROVED BY: Stephen C. Ede LAB SAMPLE NO. 5763 CLIENT SAMPLE I.D.: Sand Lake SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM MATRIX: Water METHOD: Standard Methods Milligrams/Liter pH TOTAL ORGANIC COLONIES/100 ml SUSPENDED RESIDUAL SAMPLE LOCATION UNITS CARBON, mg/1 FECAL COLIFORM SOLIDS CHLORINE BOD I Sand Lake 7.9 -- GT 20,000 41 -- 162 PARAMETER BOD, Suspended Solids, mg/l Fecal Coliform/100 ml pH, Units GT = GREATER THAN * .. *,% .• ,. ,. ;. ,• ,• ,• RATING .. ,. ,. ,. * * ,. * ,. * * * ,. EXCELLENT 0-10 200 MAXIMUM 6-8 ACCEPTABLE RESIDUAL SAMPLES WILL BE HELD UNTIL: Not Held GOOD FAIR BORDERLINE 11-20 21-30 31-45 ND = NONE DETECTED DETECTION LIMIT IN ( ) INVOICE 1` 5763 UNACCEPTABLE 45+ ALASKAN TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS,INC. - - - - - - 701 West 58th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99518 (907) 563-3117 June 24, 1987 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Environmental Protection 825 L Street Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 Dear Mr. Robert W. Robinsons. It has come to my attention after visiting with a lady by the name of Mary Prohne yesterday that the Municipality of Anchorage is funding_ testing on alternative methods of sewage disposal. As you are aware, I own an Alaskan made aerobic waste treatment system and art the inventor. I am the patent holder of the system being marketed in Alaska called Rid Waste Environmental System. It is my understandincT from Mrs. rrohne that the inventor of a peat system from Maine is beinq flown here at Municipality expense to give a lecture in July. I have been personally paying two engineering firms to pull my samples and deliver them to ChemLab here in Anchoraqe. I have gone to great expense to hire four engineering firms to design the Rid Waste systems installed within the Municipality. Since entering this testing program with you last year, I have tested both UTV disinfection and Photozone at great expense to me. Neither have proven a a_ood sewage disinfectant. To confor=j to the testing standards, I am goina to install chlorination, again creating another expense. The purpose of this letter is to see what I must do to receive grant financing from the Municipality so this testing program can continue and together we can solve the sewage treatment needs of the Plunicipality and protect the health of the citizens. Sincerely 141 THOMAS S. CPAHATI Special Representative TSG/dss MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPT. OF HEALTH 8, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 'JUN 2 51987 RECEIVED unicipa_Aty ®f Anchorage April 23, 1987 P.O. X 196650 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650 (907) 264-4111 TONY KNO WLES. MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Shelley Reese Key Pacific Mortgage 101 West Benson Blvd. Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Subject: Rid -Waste Wastewater Treatment System, Parcel 1 Sandy Beach Subdivision Dear Ms. Reese: You have requested clarification of the Municipalility's policy regarding the Rid -Waste wastewater treatment system. These systems are currently under test. Samples are periodically taken from the system to determine if they are meeting required effluent standards. After one year of testing and operation the Municipality decide whether the system has met these standards. The Municipality will require that a holding tank be installed in the event that the wastewater treatment system fails to meet effluent standards. In the case of these Rid -Waste systems, the tank can be gutted and converted to a holding tank. Sincerely, "o. Stephen S. Morris Civil Engineer on-site Services cc Gus Andress Manager, On --site and Water Quality Programs Harch 18v 1987 Department of Health and Human Services F''. (J. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519�6650 ATTN: Mr. Steve Morris Subject: Health Authority waivor of two items for Sand Lake Parcel septic permit. Dear Mr. Morris: The purpose of this letter is to request at waiver for two jtems on the originally submitted septic permit for Sand Lake Parcel l by Lee Reid of AECS. He has requested I have a signed waiver before his final inspection. the affected items are as follows: 1. Omit the manholes above the first and second compartments since there is no need for maintenance in them, 2. Omit the sludge return from the thir6 to the first chamber because it would be Fri ixinH a Phcot ozone disinfected effluent with a fresh influent which is to be bacterially processQd. If you or anyone else has questions conoerning these chanyes feel free to contact Tom or Myself" Sincere1y: LIONEL V" URBAN Special Representative cc: Robby Robinson DR. Lee |<eid Bruce Errickson, ADEC MUNICIPALITY OF --~^ DEPT. CF M�AiTH ° Ev/30om[&ml ,*}r * hWW}111 � co/ r) y �(-[|\/[|� ���~`�[j �}� ALASKAN TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS,INC. T - - - - - - - 701 West 58th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99518 (907) 563-3117 February 27, 1987 Department of Health and Human Services P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 ATTN. Steve Morris Subject: Health Authority Approval for Rid Waste Environmental System Package Wastewater Treatment Plant Dear Mr. Morris: On Saturday, February 21, 1987, I discovered that a previous business associate had installed his own air lift sludge return from the third chamber to the first. 1everal changes resulted by this unauthorized modification of the patented Rid Waste Technology: 1. Each time the compressor turned on the majority of the air was diverted from the air diffusion tubes in all three chambers to the unauthorized air lift sludge return. Anerobic conditions resulted. 2. Because the compressor had been running for 24 hours, constant circulation was occuring in the Rid Waste System. A complete mix of the entire tank was observe3. By constant flow through the tank, the time for settling in each chamber was unobtainable. Excess turbidity resulted. 3. I personally removed the air lift sludge return when discovered and rerouted the air in the proper amount to the difussion tubes. This action returne3 Rid Waste to the treatment capability indicated during the first two months of the testing program. The test dated Wednesday indicated a recovery of the treatment potential of the system and reads 18 mg/l which is well within the range proposed for suspended solids. Next week we are going to install the ozone system for disinfection and will start sending you the results from Chem Lab. After one month of four tests in line with the program, I can safely say that the recovery time from the worst use of a missed used Rid Waste System bacterilogically is 72 hours, just as Dr. Knutson discribed in his testing. Since the Rid Waste Tank is performing in the manner that it should, we can continue to research and test disinfection as well as denitrification w -'-thin the perimeters of the testing program. Sincerely: THOMAS S. GRAHAM Special Representative TS,3/dss MUNUPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPT. OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION F` CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORIES OF ALASKA, INC. - ANCHORAGEINDUSTRIAL CENTER 5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99578 TELEPHONE (907) 562.2343 L/,OORnTO RIES CLIENT SAMPLE IID D. Peters Creek MATRIX-* Water 'IMOD: Standard 19ethods, 16th Edition 209 D Suspended Solids, mg/l Not Held RESIDUAL St��1I'� ISS jILL BE iIELD UNTIL:No_ Tom Graham 2/25/87 2/25/87 1000 hrs. 2/25 - 2/26/87 5530 ND NONE DETECTED DETECTION LIMIT IN ( ) INVOICE �. 5530 I ANALYTICAL REPORT CT,TFTPT AK Technological Applications, Inc. CLIENT P. 0. ,ur� ADDRESS 1707 Eagle River.Rd. SAMPLES RECEIVED:_ Eagle River, AK 99577 SAMPLES COLLECTED: REFER QUESTION TO: Daniel J. Bacon DATE ANALYZED:_ APPROVED BY: Stephen C. Ede qC� / LAB SAMPLE NO. CLIENT SAMPLE IID D. Peters Creek MATRIX-* Water 'IMOD: Standard 19ethods, 16th Edition 209 D Suspended Solids, mg/l Not Held RESIDUAL St��1I'� ISS jILL BE iIELD UNTIL:No_ Tom Graham 2/25/87 2/25/87 1000 hrs. 2/25 - 2/26/87 5530 ND NONE DETECTED DETECTION LIMIT IN ( ) INVOICE �. 5530 I ! ALASKAN TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS,INC �`� 701 West 58th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99518 (907) 563-3117 Municipality of Anchorage P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 Attn: Steve Morris 'NICIPALITY OF ANCRORA R DEPT, 01' HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ',SAN 191987 RE CE IV ED January 15, 1987 T, Tom Murphy, as of January 15,1987 do hereby resign from potential job titles, and associations with Alaska Technelogical Applications, DBA Town and Country Pumping KASKA buffinMenTAL COUROL SeRuUS, InC. �ngmeermq & enmronmenlal Jludies Municipality of Anchorage Department of HeaKh and Human Services 225 L i i.Teet . Suite 502 Anchorage, Alaska 99001i Atte: Steve Morris Re: Parcel 2, Sandy Reach Subdivision Dear Steve: December 31. 1906 CA t�uN� pEP,. CA EN��R�N�SN�\ � 1garl Pursuant to our telephone conversation on Wednesday. December 31, 1906 regarding the subject lot, AECS, Inc. requests that a condi-tion be placed on the Heal& Aut-hority Approval. This condition should he based on the following dei'icienci.es in the. Ridwaste Environmental System package wastewater treatment plant. Change the ultraviolet disinfeV ion unit to Pho l:ozone -nciii eyed oxygen" system as shown in the drawings. 2 Modify sampling point to facilitate easy sampling of el1lgcnk. 0. install manholes over the tank as shown In the drawings. A install a skUling chamber in He third compartment as depicted in UK, drawings. When these deficiencies ,lave, been cor r enect, your Oepar amen t will be no L i f i nd in writing by AEC S and a fullapproval can be gra.ni-.CC`_. -J you love any questions, please Contact: me at. 561-.3010. Sincerely, i' 8 %ell T. f'ol'ds Civil Engineer Approved by: iero�� C. He i'rE�s i cie,, ;. CC: Tom Murphy, phy ATA. j 0 i West 58th Avenue . Anchorage. AK 995 01 Lionel I Y'1)an. ATA, 70i West. 580 Avenue. Anchorage. AN 9954- 000 Uesl 33rd Auenur IN B • Wungr Abska 99503 • (901) 56;5040 t�� r � fL�, ALASKAN TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, INC. -"-' �� �� ``- 165 East 56th Avneue Anchorage, Alaska 99518 (907) 562-2560 August 51 1956 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Environmental Protection 525 L Street Anchorage , Alaska 99502.-0650 Attention: Mr Robert W. Robinson Dear Mr Robinson: For some time now Mr. Bruce Erickson of ADFC, your department, and yourself have been discussing new discharge standards for effluent into ground water tables, surface discharge and water discharge. EPA guidelines of 30mg/l Suspended Solids, 30 mg/l BOD5, neutral pH, fecal coliform of 20 colonies per 100., plus nitrates of 10 or less along with an accounting of nitrite, ICjedahal nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, and dissolved oxygen be involved in the testing procedures. At your request, the duration of the test and the procedures for testing are outlined below: TESTING PROCEDURES All samples will be collected by an independent contractor to all parties. All samples will be tested at a laboratory licensed by the State of Alaska. .All tests will be conducted in a manner prescribed by Standard Methods. TESTING GOALS & PARAME' Suspended Solids 30 mg/l BOD5 30 mg/1 pH 6-9 Fecal coliform 20 colonies/100 ml. Nitrate -N 10 or less Nitrate -N Kjedahal Nitrogen Amonia Nitrogen Dissolved Oxygen Phosphrous Levels Temperature TESTING FREQUENCY Weekly for the first three months or 12 sample:, Monthly for the remaining months of the test duration: 1 year or. less. MAINTENANCE During the testing period the Engineer will. do the in field observations of the system. If service is needed, Manufacturer will service system. Copies of both reports wi11 be submitted to both ADEc and MOA. After the test period (lyr) the semi-annual testing will probably be done in conjunction with the semiannual maintenance. POINT OF TESTING Outfall of disinfection INSTALLATION PROCEDURES Dower off valve installed downstream from tzmk Compressor and pump on same circuit Compressor to have gauge to shut off valve for lack of pressure Alarm on separate circuit Alarm to be both visual and audio BONDING The amount of $1,000.00 is to be deposited in an interest bearing account in the First Interstate Bank, O'Malley Branch. This amount of money will convert this system in a holding tank if needed. Interest remains the property of the holder of the TCD. At the conclusion of this testing program of system performance within the arithmetic mean of the parameters of the test, ADEC and MOA shall certify this combination of technology in performance for use in surface discharge, direct discharge, and ground water discharge by having met the above criteria, subject to other regulatory requirements. My company is prepared to begin thi s Sin a THOMAS S. GRAHAM Special Representative TSG/ds testing progrr as soon as pow ib Accepted by: Department of amental Conservation Municipa ity of Anchorage HID -WASTE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS INC. BEIB4EEN AND CO`JERING A 5820 Horseshoe Bar Road Posl Office Box 344 Loomis. California 95650 (916)652.7200 c.cri icsi/ * 49B to RID WASTE ENVIRON14ENTAL SYSTEMS, INC. MAINTENANCE SERVICE AGREEMENT (Servicer) Own e r ) (RID WASTE ENVIRONMENTAL 'TREATMENT PLANT) LOCATED AT E'or to period of years, from the date of this agreement agrees to perform main ed to ascertain tenance and service and to perform such testing and inspection as requir That the plant is operating as desigi ed. If it should be necessary to replace any parts of the equipment the Servicer shall make Such replacements of the parts and materials required. There "rill be no charge for labor, mileage and parts under the two year wa-r-ranty. 6rvice calls resulting from the following ;reasons are not covered by this :greement and will be billed at the regular hou.ziy current rate. .r 1 (aj Power or fuse failure. (b) Flooding, freezing, tank settling, freezing of the effluent line. (c) Discharge of any material, liquid or solid into the unit which could nct be con= sidered normal bio -degradable household effluent- waste. (d) Crushing of unit or piping due to overload on the ground above or area thereof. (e) Clogged inlet or effluent line. will make service checks annually which include calls for emergency repairs. is relieved of any further responsibilities if at any time during the term of this agreement you permit any othe'r persons or employees of any other co;npany to render any service or make any adjustments or changes to the equipment, except when instructed by us. We will not be responsble for any direct or indirect damages arising from failure of system and or equipment, but undertake unchr the terms outlined in this agreement to do such adjusting as may from time to time be necessary. Mie servicer will not be responsible for damages resulting from fire,` flood and accident and delays auavoitiable or beyond our control. DEFAULT: If the customer does not pay any invoices due from services rendered within 30 (thirty) days of billing date, may (a) refuse to continue service or (b) furnish service only on a C.O.D. basis. The customer agrees to pay costs and expences of collection plus interest, including the maximum attorney's fee permitted by law. 1 Em Owner Mailing address = ST CL jUD STATE UNIVERSI s COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES Department of Biological Sciences St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 (612) 255-2036 , I. History --Objectives of Rid -Waste Design. A. The first unit was installed and tested in St. Cloud, Minnesota, in the fall of 10'75 to July 1976. 1. The unit was installed on private property to serve a new home with Five family members. 2. A septic system permit was issued for the 1250 gallon tank Jan- uary 26, 1976, that was to operate aerobically. 3. Loading was measured by watermeter to be 52 gallons per person per day. 4. The tank was divided into three compartments, the first being to receive influent, second to aerate influent waste water, and third to clarify waste to be pumped to drainfield. Air was added 15 minutes per hour except during heavy use. At breakfast and dinner hours, it was 30 minutes per hour. Air was off from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. 5. The field testing period covered seven months, and during that time composite samples were collected over a 24 hour period of raw in- fluent, aerated influent (mixed liquor) and clarified effluent. 6. Laboratory tests followed the Standard Methods, UPHS, and included dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD at 200C), suspended solids, volatile suspended solids, pH, tempRrature, Nitrates, phosphates, conductivity, total dissolved solids, chemical oxygen demand, and fecal coliform test. a. Effluent quality of the first unit over 7 months: BODS mg/1 Suspended Solids, mg/l Average Best 69 60 73 26 b. This unit under best operation met Class II NSF plant specifi- cations, but under overall operation did not. c. Stress Testing was done to determine shock temperature effects on the biota of the central aerobic chamber. Influent tempera- ture ranged 10-30°C with a 10% increase occurring on the typical Monday morning wash day. Microscopic examination of A [A C. -2- biota "indicated better growth (great density) with no reduction after the shock load. Frozen soil cooled the unit to 10°C during winter montfis, reducing biota efficiency, making warm water from household use a benefit to the system in cold weather. Average summer Lank temperature was 20°C. 7. Field percolation rates were determined to 91 minutes/inch with a field range of 18.5 to [40. 1200' of 1 inch perforated PVC was laid in'ditchwitch trenches with natural backfill and no rockbed. Sample collection tubes were installed to extract percolated effluent and soil. Fall and winter operation of the pressure dosed field was good with no surfacing of effluent. The second unit was installed for a new home of an eleven member family in August, 1976. Testing lasted from November,1976 to July, 1977. 1. This unit was modified to include aeration of two chambers: 1) central and 2) final effluent, to improve upon the BOD removal. Other design and operation changes were minor but done to iAprove upon operation and maintenance. Aeration was set on 30 minutes per hour all clay and night. 2. Loading was measured to be 48 gallons per person per day. 3. The same tests were run on this second 1250 gallon unit. a. Effluent quality of the second unit over nine months of testing: BOD5 mg/l Suspended Solids mg/l Average Best 56 48 52 48 b. The second unit under best operation met Class II NSF plant. effluent specifications. Improvement was about 20% over unit one, -even -though the BOD5 loading was 2.2x greater -(1.87 lbs. BOD5/day, vs. 0.85 lbs. BOD 5/day for first unit.) The third unit was installed on July 28, 1978, at a family residence in Grass Valley, California.- After one year of operation it was tested in July, 1979. 1. This unit served a three member family. 2. Several changes were made in the design to handle larger BOD and hydraulic loading. Aeration was added to the influent chamber so all three were aerated. 3. Testing of this unit yielded the answer to the final modification needed to achieve a better effluent. Rather than modify this third unit, several otherq were installed in the final and present Rid - Waste unit. Several modifications needed were: a. Add air to all chambers 24 hours per day. -3- b Position perforated pipe air diffusers to cause greater air/ water exchange and double the number in central mixed liquor chamber. c. Increase the size of the tank to 1500 gallons. d. Add go -catch -it filter between the second and third chamber to return solids.and produce a clearer effluent. D. The modified fourth (Kusian) and fifth (the current design Smith tank [installed 9/10/79]) units were installed in the Nevada City and Placer- ville, California, area.. They were tested as indicated below: 1. Testing in August, 1980, on unit 4 with all modifications were: Average Maximum Best BODS mg/l 10 12 8 Suspended Solids mg/l 9 10 8 2. Tests repeated in October, 1980, on unit 5, with six continuous days of testing, 100 milliliter/20 minutes -For 24 hours composit. Average Maximum Best BOD5 mg/1 9.3 13 4 Suspended Solids mg/l 12.3 16 6 3. This testing program yielded results that meet Class I NSF plant effluent specifications 100% of the time. E. The testing program from 1975-1980 involved five field units and 534 samples of waste water analyzed for BODS, suspended solids, plus other essential chemistry to evaluate the units performance. I a The U.S. EPA, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPOES) program requires large municipal wastewater plants to test wastewater daily and report monthly. Smaller units in small -communities test weekly to monthly for reports. Our testing program integrated the test frequency from monthly 24 hour composite samples to weekly or continuous testing for a full week. NSF testing schedule is one single unit for 5 days for 26 weeks, or 130 samples. Our program ran over 6 years, using 5 units and 534 samples. 2. Stress testing was done that parallels the NSF program. Our testing was completed before NSF included stress in their program and was completed under actual field conditions, not simulation. a. Wash day effects of hot soapy water surging into the unit. Our results: heat was beneficial (always less than 30°C) to organ- ism growth, and did not affect efficiency of the mixed liquor tank. b. Working mother stress, or reduced loading 5 days/week from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Our results showed no change in BOD5 reduction or biota of mixed liquor tank. II -4- c. Equipment or power failure. Our first unit in 1975 experienced air compressor and pump failure as well as automatic timer failure. With timer and air compressor failure the unit went septic but returned to aerobic 24 hours after corrections. Pump screen clogging with hair prevented discharge. The effluent waste volume rose in fluid tank and set off the alarm. The pump was pulled, cleaned, and put back in service that day. Conclu- sions: pump now utilized has 3/4" opening, not 1/8". Compres- sor could not be in tank. d. Vacation effects on unit operation were evaluated when the families using our first two tanks left for two weeks. All aerated tanks reached a state of uniform oxygen concentration, 7.5 mg/l DO and suspended solids (bacteria cells). Upon their return biota in mixed liquor (aerated chamber tank) increased with increased loading. No affects were noted one or two weeks after their return. Materials, Design and Construction (See NSF standard 40 and literature accompaning product specifications.) A. Materials Durability 3.1-3.6 B. Design Watertight 4.2 Soundness 4.3 Operation under load condition 4.5 to C. Technical specification--size--volume compressor size, etc. 24 hour air operation. Larger volume pressor with increased air capabilities. Service--Maintenance---Warranty A. Indication of failure 4.1 Inspection B. Serviceability 4.6, 4.8 Energy requirements 4.7 J C. Warranty 4.9, 4.10 size for 1-2 families requires larger com- /V-1 74 Q�'.c/ KEITH M. KNUTSON, Ph.D. Professor of Biology, Microbiologist, Lake Hydrologist ALGAE SPECIALIST:" Phytoplan ton Periphyton Voucher Types Chlorophyll. Analysis MICROBIOLOGY: Collforms Fecal Coliforms Fecal Strep Total Bacteria Physiological Gps. Yeast Counts Fungi Counts WASTEWATER TESTING: BOD COD Suspended Solids Total Solids pH Turbidity Color Nitrates Phosphates Conductance Hardness Chlorine Alkalinity Organic Matter Volatile Matter Organic Nitrogen Septic Tanks ECOLOGICAL: Lake Survey Stream Survey Point Source Study Non -Point Source Study Productivity Pollution Study REPORT PREPARATION_: Monitoring Hearings Impacts Scientific Dr. Aeith M. Knutson Consulting Biologist Route 4 at Luxemburg St. Cloud, Mn. 56301 (612) 252-5061 LABORATORY REPORT Date: May 18, 1976 Accession No. 1010 Name: Ronald Thomas Address: Route 3, St. Cloud, Mn. 56301 Specimen: drain field percolation test RESULTS Six percolation test holes were drilled at 6:00 am May 18th. Three were located at the upper portion of the field and three along the lower portion of the field. b 6 if 0 � 0_0 03 �o a 0s f/o+hd The holes were filled with 12 inches of water and refilled after 4 hrs. At 5:30 to 6:00 pm the six holes were adjusted -to about 6 inches of water and initial depth measurement of depth to water surface taken. In 30 minutes a second depth was taken, the difference being the per- colation rate in minutes per inch or inches per hour. As evidenced by a small pond that was dry adjacent to the field the water table exceeded 10 feet depth in the drain field area. Hole Minutes/inch Inches/Hour 1 24 2-J 2 26.6 2R 18.5 31 4 120 5240 6 120 Average 91.5 1 , ALGAE SPECIALIST 4 Phytoplankton Periphyton Voucher Types Chlorophyll Analysis MICROBIOLOGY: Coli o-3° rms Fecal Coliforms Fecal Strep Total Bacteria Physiological Gps. Yeast Counts Fungi Counts WASTEWATER TESTING: BOD COD Suspended Solids Total Solids PH Turbidity Color Nitrates Phosphates Conductance Hardness C :lorine Alkalinity Organic Matter Volatile Matter Organic Nitrogen Septic Tanks ECOLOGICAL: Lake Survey Stream Survey Point Source Study Non -Point Source St Productivity Pollution Study REPORT PREPARATION_: Monitoring Hearings Impacts Scientific. 1ABORATORY Ur. K-ith M. Enutson Cons, ing Biologist Route 4 at Luxemburg St. Cloud, Mn. 56301 ( 612 ) 252--5061 REPORT Date: June 25, 1976 Accession No. 1011 Name: Ronald Thomas Address: Route 3, St. Cloud, Mn. 56301 Specimen: Sewage (Waste Treatment System) RESULTS Analysis Influent Effluent %Red. BOD 680mg/l 78 mg/1 88.5 Nitrogen 0 0 Phosphates 28 mg/1 25 mg/l S. Solids 2150 mg/1 48 mg/1 97.7 PH 6.8 7.0 Temp.(C) 16.6 16.6* * Thomas family on vacation -no water use :or one week -temp. same all tanks. Water Used: Meter installed May 12, 1976 2366.0 cu. f:.. Reading May 29, 1976 6369.2 cu. ft. 48 days less 7 days vacation - 41 days 6369.2 - 2366 - 4003.2 cu. ft. used/41 days (1 cu. ft. + 7.48 gallons) 4003.2 X 7.48 = 29,943.9 gallons/41 days or 730_ g l ons/day for the test period Date W ALGAE SPECIALIST:& Phytop ankton Periphyton Voucher Types Chlorophyll Analysis MICROBIOLOGY: Coliforms Fecal Coliforms Fecal Strep Total Bacteria Physiological. Gps. Yeast Counts Fungi Counts WASTEWATER TESTING: BOD COD Suspended Solids Total Solids pH Turbidity Color Nitrates Phosphates Conductance Hardness Chlorine Alkalinity Organic Matter Volatile Matter Organic Nitrogen Septic Tanks ECOLOGICAL: Lake Survey Stream Survey Point Source Study Non -Point Source S Productivity Pollution Study REPORT PREPARATION: iMonitoringHearings Impacts Scientific Dr. _,ith M. Knutson Consulting Biologist Route 4 at Luxemburg St. Cloud, Mm. 56301 (612) 252-5061 LABORATORY REPORT Date: 28 July 1976 Accession No. 1017 Name: Andrew Craoetz Address: Route 4, St. Cloud, Mn. 56301 Specimen: Soil and percolation tests ANALYSIS PERCOLATION RATE SOIL TEXTURE AND I.D. Station Min./in, in./hr. Sand% Silt% Clay% Clans 1 74.6 .8 55.1 27.4 17.4 3arid y 2 96 .63 62.7 19.8 17.4 it 3 46.4 1.2 20.4 54.0 25.4 Silt 4 43.2 1.4 23,8 53.0 23.0 " 5 96 .63 51.8 37.0 11.1. Sandy 6 176 .34 51.8 28.4 19.7 " 7 9.3 6,45 39.8 42.1 18.1 Loam 8 15.4 3.89 64.5 20.7 14.7 Sandy 9 46.4 1.3 34.4 43.6 21.8 Loam 10 58 1 68.0 19.8 12.2 Sandy 11 41.6 1.4 69.4 17.6 13.4 Sandy 12 85.3 .7 60.6 21..7 17.7 13 80 .75 55.6 25.7 18.7 " 14 27.3 2.2 30.6 49.7 19.7 Silt 15 40 1.5 20,6 61.7 17.7 if 16 88 .7 58.6 28.7 12.7 Sandy Note: Refer to the diagram of the Cravetz home and drain field location. The field encompasses percolation teat holes 3,4,5,6,7,8,14,15, ar:d 16. The average rate for the nine holes is 60.17 min./in. or .99 in./hr. which indicates poor drainage soil and at the lower end of the scale for suitable subsurface -tile systems. Date By Dr. Keith M. Knutson Consulting Biologist Route 4 at Luxemburg St. Cloud, Mn. 56301 (612)-252-5061 LABORATORY REPORT ALGAE SPECIALIST: �P�ytop an ton Date: September 17, 17* cession No. 1024 ftze: Andres 0mrats Periphyton Address: Route 41 St. Cloud, Mn. 56301 Voucher Types Specimen: Swage, Space AKe Concept System Chlorophyll Analysis Examination Requested: by Ten Ora)-Ln, Cosmanaho Ir.;. MICROBIOLOGY: �oT-1onf ns RESULT` o Fecal Coliforms _ AHALT3I9 INFLUV(T ASR. TALME li"MENP RM. ®-- Fecal Strep Total Bacteria Bacteria BM5 3140 mi/I 190 ng/I • 110 mg/l 64.5 Physiological Gps. Tamp•(f) 76 78 78 Yeast Counts PR 7.0 7.1 7.0 Fungi Counts D. Kan 4.5 m8/1 0 0 rh re; 9CtuP WASTEWATER TESTING: .(soluble! 15 P3/l 55 Mg/l Ff60 mg/1 aJ Nitrate-N 0 0 0..' COD xitrito-N o 0 0 Suspended Solids Lrn=mL^-N 51 7g/1 45 mg/l 25 mt/1 Total Solids Co-eluctIrity &40 2800 2700 mieromahs/en PH Turbidity(1TU) 38 42 18 52.6 Turbidity S. Solids 201 rg/l 58 m4;/1 56 M/1 72.1 Color Nitrates Vater Usedi Motor Date Days off Phosphates 27192.2 21 August 0 Conductance 27648.2 27 August 6s8 Hardness 29033.9 17 Sept 21 1 Chlorine Totals 27 P;+1.7 Alkalinity Calculation of gallon s/day/personr Organic batter 1641.7 z 7.48 iral/efs r 13,775.9 gal. Volatile Flatter 13+775.9&1./27 days A 510.2 gnl./day Organic Nitrogen 510.2 Rat/10 family meni>srs - Z..O nl. d Septic Tanks ECOLOGICAL: Notal The Oravets foxily consists of three adults _57e �u7vey seven children of whioh two aro under 10 years old. Stream Survey Point Source Study Coonsultarrt� Comments This toot reveals that the xyfftia Non -Point Source Study is functioning mechanically but not ezagtly biologioa Productivity as yet. Only 13.775.9 tallows of waste water have ore.ored Pollution Study the systsm and mince this was a new house much of the water w4s wash waterg detergents, disinfectants, oto. REPORT PREPARATION: to, the 1200 gallon tank was displaced about 12 tunas Foniforing Until the aeration tank de"lopo a biological funeti Hearings perhaps X is 60 days none and holds a suspended soli s Impacts of 500 and/l or more no testing will be done. However Scientific testing should continue on the offlwmt_ligvid. It is net unasaal for a biological system to require a ti ae ohing a fvnct,iona microbial popalsti Da to ... By. -7az4 1. 7M7 0 V) W) WIISIA , m w Z o �•� V a tn O -p i Z uj w W c , i �,•� � 'a L.o •- W ... v v ¢ " a N WATER TESTING SERVICE, INC.}` ane. _ ','Louth 21s4 Av[n" St. C1oud..MN 56301 ('hone (612) 232.5061 f: P: October i1, 1979 Rid -Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. 2515 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F Auburn, California 95603 Re: Evaluation of the Rid -waste domestic wastewater system performance data. From July 9 - 16, 1979 the 'Rid -Waste system was sampled and tested by Dr. Keith M. Knutson, Rid -waste consulting microbiologist with laboratory testing done by Cranmer Engineering Corporation at Grass Valley, California. The Rid -Waste system is a mechanical unit utilizing aeration to stabilize waste- water. The final product or effluent is either pumped or qravity drained into a leach field for final disoosal. Our testing demonstrated the capabilities of the Rid -Waste unit. The effluent contained no settleable solids. 94.S% removal of suspended solids, and 99.9% removal of biochemical oxygen dmand. Field tests show best the results of how families can Process wastewater. All laboratory testinq followed the 1976 U. S. Public Health Service handbook "STANDARD METHODS for the examination of Water and Wastewater". Sincerely, nr. Keith M. Knutson Consultinq Microbiologist I a, I (D r A kO 0 M e W N (D N M n \ Ft \ N N (n O •• 9 •• w or a w ft k' a f1 b a n 010 O W (D N O r (D (D a zr O (D 00 �n a a "a 0 �j < M N 0 UO 0' (D ►' O rr O (D oN eJN N a n Oe Oa o ►- e n cn (0 0 a O n a 0 I'0 a ►�•0 n cn m cn a x to a a a ra �q 0 nrt a 00J �o En h 0 N A N M N b a o a r J f1 M MZ M 3 H x M M MN5 Ph M1 k+- 0 m1+:( mF- M M1 r(I X M X M X M1 .X M X I•A "X N F• N'(D N foN Nm 0.- M N (D N N 0 eat r. ea 1: a eae ecj 0 a = a :3 :3 n • 1'V.1 N f7 r1' ft A ft er ft rt rr (t ft ft 1•' r O O (D a. N r r A c.w O� ul co Ln p N N O N CO O+ (J A. 0 0 A W W P vi \ \ \ \ fD r N N PQ w 0 O r O It a A kn w O+ Ln -j lT O a X co \c z o P b Ln O o a, T IZ 0o N + N O �1 O N rw ON %0 ai \D J -.] li w a r 0 (D • V'I LM VI %D m co O% a (D n n 7 O n N ;7 (D O (DIC a h W a r+ o •.a co (D. ft 7 O A a D 04 F,. C O rn to 00 _ !� r� O 7 u 7 ro v > z . E a � E .11 1_ v E O v x � E b > O , N u 4! 41 U) IV c O 1 -H � ro IV .t 91 Gl M 4J u o v u A B O 4 a) ro •H v 4 04 4J O O .n ro O v rl r-1 ro � > re C E Q) N 44 C O O N Cn ul (� ro -H $4 > O 4 re a 41 a •,i O •,4 V) O rt O 9 ro ro E v vo N x u ro ••+ v m z ca 'v v u Q) a r, o m v Ln ND %D �O v u W v a v r o -' Q`IV N N N r1 V' N ro sa CO Ln WD M �r• 0 0 0 r+ .. �D ri .-n M ut C� cO r1 a xm r Ln V' to r- V• %D N g rn D .A v1 0 ao o r, rel CD 0 o r .a Ln ti C g Ln 17, N r1 w v rr 1- O+ 0 "f %D m r' 0 O O %D -4 rf N N U1 N e l ro cr I I J— l4j)r0.4 rrC C r: C 4 C C -1 O C 14 O O G v v v v v v v v v v v v �ro a aro a aro a ro .•A v rt r+ v v r+ .a v r1 rt v rr v w x w x 4.1 w x LW X w w x w w x w X C .4 e H 44 C •q C -,1 w O •H 44 % a 4-4 •H F -i g H g t�7 H g g W H g W H W g E .� z z z E al rA a z 1 ro ro ro N a '° ami c�i .-4 *a rn v \ cr c C O 7 w E 4 41 41 0 vl -M r .a it O z z4 z N X a .�4 a ro u ro v z CI fd 1-1 ro O re v 1.4 .4 ro E !L -ox zE r° u 7 ro v > z . E a � E .11 1_ v E O v x � E b > O , N u 4! 41 U) IV c O 1 -H � ro IV .t 91 Gl M 4J u o v u A B O 4 a) ro •H v 4 04 4J O O .n ro O v rl r-1 ro � > re C E Q) N 44 C O O N Cn ul (� ro -H $4 > O 4 re a 41 a •,i O •,4 V) O rt O 9 ro ro E v vo N x u ro ••+ v m z ca 'v v l R/�rJMFR Nc IrJFGRING. Ir C, Consulrinp Encjmcc,, _ 111! t '-,I I '.111-.1 27 1 1:'114 VAI I.FY. l.A HAr1CI?IOLOGICAL LXAMI[IAtlot I U( 'VitIll1I? 1-7> (:l ient pr"Ste lab No. 2 t0# Address ual.e --.... lire. 7 y. Do lc kr�lun•tt>d SaIIII)le ldentit-y��b� 79-1# Y® kk, Ilny If(). y/,qr Tube No. -- ^ I 2 3 4 5.1 6 7 8 _9. 1(1 11 12 13 14 15 Portions Set. (ml) tp ( tAl tp( t0� tOxlrO 1o; 18 tOb IOy t0 v IOY t�P �� to Preliminary 24 fir. T JI est Flo fit'. Test 411 fir. E.C. T1rbe rfn. A, ala As A As A6 A, �j At At& 3o ea. B 89 Total COIif0rill MPII/100 m1 @ 35" C Fecal Coli form MPri/ 100 ml @ 44.5° C > -Z000 000 ... .r_.. Sample Identity rook #3 %•9'� O4?:3o klc_ Tray No. %a>%T, 9-2, Tube No. 1 2 t0# 3 1Ui 4 t0 -, 6 10 7 t0 Portions Set (ml) j0 t0 Pre Iiminary 24 hr. Test 411 lir. + �+ + e + -}- _e i } t 4"lirmed c14 -4x.. Test Ott Irr. E . C. 1 ulna No 24 hr•_ 4 a 9 10 Il 12 13 14 15 10 toj tb b too 6b; Ior 110- ,;Jr 1nt111 Col i Inru1 1.11111/ 100 I'll 0 31s" C Irr.11 f.uliln1111 !11'11/1(111 mf b1 41 rs" ( ZYD00000 i CNANM EN(�WjEFIqCI INC '.f •til �Ij i�l .. .v •i41 ill l r Y n 9"1Vl I >_ CollSVIIf,,q Enyni[CIS nil,. 2 I 7711E 1 LAGORAjfORY REPORT HACIEI?IOLOGICnL 1,01AINMI011 Of VMI If? ClientWaste. Lab 111). 9�a� q Uak' krllorted Address � - Ual.e khc. %�Q-�.i 3� Sample ldentil.y/aM� *I 7P7' at -sr � Trey IIo. C 6 Tube No. 1 (0� + 2 �0 f- 3 (0 -4{- 4 (04 5 6 10f 7 l0 8 Ib 9 106 10 (o7 If 1D7 12 13 14 15 Portions Set. (fill) 1'0 1" Pre 1 i m i na ry 24 h r . Tes t 48 111% Calf i ruled 24-4r- Tcst 4li hr. E.C. lube No 24 hr. yCs Gei4i-mued 24 -+rt Test 48 hr. E. C. Tuhe 11n. + 4- .f.. + {- 4- + - -24 In__ til_ �_ 83 6, 6s. 6b,6 6 G4 'le-tal Coli form t4PN/ 100 fill @ 35" C J� X00 0��oap Fecal Coliform 14PI,1/ 100 fill @ 44.5° C Sample Identity -Taffj .#a 7 -IO -%7 69:4r 4 Tube No. 1 2 .i- .4 -5- -6 -7 8 Portiuns SeL (ml) Preliminary 24 hr. Test 48 lu•. }- + + f- t + 1" Calf i ruled 24-4r- Tcst 4li hr. E.C. lube No 24 hr. yCs C36169 e, In La I Col i form 1.11111/ 10(, fill 0 .1r)" C. Trey No. .37/, 32Z 1Z-f_1—(i4T-15 IIrnI Cnli(firIll 111'11/Ilrll rill 14 11,!," (' g3�00i►�OOB CHANMII,:R:�LHGGf^k(RIN INC If y/uN- q,,•rcei if �:,••nl I1 ; A11'.11 LABORATORY nrPonT IiAClLI?W1.i�GICAL I.xAinIII AI10l Ill v1r%III, Addrer,s . Dot R(, :. Ua 1 (` P1,110 ti'd Saug11e Idrnl.il.y la441f— � 7 01:2fO ik.k. ►l,ly !Ii). -/© Tube No. '— - 1 2 3 14 5 1 li 7 8 9 i If 1 1 12 13 14 1'�- Por tions Set. (III I) 10 Ib 10 Id /0 IF 10 10 to 10 14 ib 107 Preliminary 24 hr. I f ,+ Tes t 47t 111'. .� -Ee"-f4 rine d -44-4r i Test 48 hr. E . C. _ Tube No.$9 $b C► (,t C3 r,r �s C6 — — — [T — 2 Total Coliform i11'11/111) ml @ 35" C i-eca i Co 1 i form iiPII/ 101) mI 0 44. 5" C 73'000�Q 00 Sample ►d(-n1Jty _raksk f 3 ?•1/•71 OQ:Op kk irnv Ho. 32/ -37.z. Tube No. 11 !; 6 7 li U 10 11 12 1 ,l 1 t I'• Porti1�115 Se 1. (ilii) I�"10 10 Ip {0� IOi10 iOi l0 b� 10�� fi7 -- Preliminary 24 hr. }- 4- TesL 471 111" Gni+med 1=�4--laa•. Tcs t 48 III•• E. C. 1IIbf, iI''._ ct _ — f � 111 OIL �� l �� v6 D' D j 9 — 1-11 11 1-11,11 Col iImIll I.11'i!.'I1)') -,,I hA ",' I' I of I I G,I i I If 1 1.1 1JI, 11; 111:1 ,-,I p 11. 1, 1 /J/OL;000,000 CKAIIAII'HENC - tic. iit4c 0 y ion 1v(1rr• 1, LnaoP,ATnnr nr-ronT (JAC I LIM) -D GIC71L I MAINA110fl of viAr( li I; I H.�L 1,1 ientWaS/c Lo ll No. Add res s 7./Z-77 ' I / '11.1 Sample I d l' I l i.i r. )r -T,, L * l Tube No. -1 l 3 I 4 5( 6 7 t; 9 11I 11 1 Z 1 3 �I4 15 1 Portions Set (ml) - - - - (0 Y -- tO - (0 IO 10 10 -� •6 •' - _ I0 10 to folo_ to Pre iulin,ry 24 hr L,. Test 4!1 In•. - - -- - -- — �I 4ri4-f, ruled -Z4-4+t-. lest E.C. Tune 11n—Az A, Ay AsA� >A7q� q - ----- _... 211 Ill • . To to l Co l i fol•ul fil'If/ l Ur) nl l (a 35^ C fecal Col i fol,n I1P(I/Intl ml @ 44.5^ C - / /0�OL-)4,800 S,1I1411e Idrnt.iLy , - 7•x.79 1O: IS- Ido. Z77, 2S-0 Tube No. I2 3 4 5 6 7 d g In ----- -- - _ 11 17. 13 1•t iti Portions Set (Int) -y -Y •Y f-- -T 6 { -i —� — -- -- lc to fo I6 to fo to Io (0 PreI iIll i )al'y 24 Ill•. Tos t -LQLfl riled P+i-IIr. res L E. C. lulu'..11i1 az BS &7 — --- IninI f.(IliInrul FII1f)"I1111 I I•r,l 1 (.111 i I''I'm f il'fl/ I1:,) %5 00 01 000 CHANa LN(: 1 R! (' l nv K,p ram,,_, IPt: L,. 3a 3 ,,, r,. CRANML ENGINEERING, IN Consulting Engineers 4ST MAIN ST. DX 943 VALLEY, CA 95945 :IDENTIFICATION_ Well Water July 13. 1979 LABORATORY REPORT Rid Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. 2515 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F Auburn, California 95603 Parameter Specific Conductivity, micromhos/cm at 25% PH Total Phosphorus as P, mg/1 Ammonia as N, mg/l Nitrate as N, mg/l Hardness as Ca CO3, mg/l Calcium, mg/l Magnesium, mg/l (916) 273-7264 DATE REPORTED July 26, 1979 DATE RECEIVED July 13, 1979 LAB. NO. 9020 Amount 46 7.1 0.02 0.19 0.01 21 6.6 1.0 CRAN*94� ENC,�N"RIN6,,QK. - � - -1 1 . • III t L- UN I fa-naull;�q Enylnear� CnST PAIN LT. D. UUz 843 19 16) 273-);&A Hass VALLEY, ca vsws LA60RATOnY REPORT ti►k►LE IDENTIFICATION • Raw and processed Dare REPORTED.._...July.•$Q,. 1 7�9 dater from Rid-Waste_SyStelq DATE RECEIVED --- L A0. No. .,._ - id -Waste Environa,ental Systems, Ltd. 515 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F uburn,' California 95603 ample Location: Influent (T-1) Aerobic cell (T-2) Effluent (T-3) arple Collection: By Ur. Keith Knutson, microbiologist, field testing consultant for Rid -Waste. ionple Site: Rid -Waste system pilot plant for a private r@sidence, Nevada County, California istallation: July, 1978; 1 year continuous operation ialysis requested: r;. Aeration Nitrate Nitrogen as N, rcl�/1 Period ab I Date Tillie twirl hour (1) T-1 T ? 978 �tw IUU4 1016 1018 IU20 1025 1032 1032 7/9/79 09:40 1/10/79 00:5u 7/11/79 09:10 7/12/79 10:30 7/12/79 15:45 7/13/79 08:45 7/13/79 16:00 7/16/79 09:00- 11:00 (2) 30 30 30 30 30. -.45 7/ib/79 11:00- 45 13:00 (2) btes 11) Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. ;2) 4 ration discontinued in Tank 3. OIrlCW sl Al OKAS nr'.tK •CeµM / e CRAMMER CNGINE[RIWG, INC. 4 0.22. -- 0.15 0.23 0.20 0.22 0.23 0.20 0.26 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.23 0.16 0.15 0.28 0.49 0.44 0.13 0.48 0.27 •- -- 0.69 •- •• 0.44 btes 11) Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. ;2) 4 ration discontinued in Tank 3. OIrlCW sl Al OKAS nr'.tK •CeµM / e CRAMMER CNGINE[RIWG, INC. 4 Con3uflin9 Fn9incers 11118 CAST IAAIN ST. P O t,Ox 943 1916) 273-7284 GRASS VALLEY, CA 95945 LABORATORY REPORT SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION RaW and processed DATE REPORTED July._?O, 1979 water from Rid-Waste_system _ — — —. DATE RECEIVED Rid -Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. 2515 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F Auburn, California 95603 ' Sample Location: Influent (T-1) Aerobic cell (T-2) Effluent (T-3) Sample Collection: By Ur. Keith Knutson, microbiologist, field testing consultant for Rid -Waste. Sample -Site: Rid -Waste system pilot plant for a private r6sidence, Nevada County, California Installation: July, 1978; 1 year continuous operation Analysis requested: lo Les (1) Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. (2) Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. OrFICIAL SIAL _ �I ANDREIVI R. CASSANOI� v NOIArr r7;;;rr . rA11rn„,,IIA / ' CRANJuER ENGINEERINe. INC. Aeration — Nitrate Nitrogen as N, rr /l Period Lab k Date Time mill/hour (1) T-1 T-2 T-3 9978 1/9/79 09:40 15 0.22 -- 0.15 9933 7/1U/79 08:50 15 0.23 0.20 0.22 91OU4 7/11/79 09:10 30 0.23 0.20 0.26 91016 7/12/79 10:30 30 0.15 0.14 0.13 91018 7/12/79 15:45 30 0.23 0.16 0.15 91020 7/13/79 08:45 30 0.28 0.49 0.44 91U25 7/13/79 16:00 30. 0.13 0.48 0.27 91032 7/1G/79 09:00---45 - -- 0.69 11:00 (2•) 91032 7/ib/79 11:00- 45 0.44 13:00 (2) lo Les (1) Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. (2) Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. OrFICIAL SIAL _ �I ANDREIVI R. CASSANOI� v NOIArr r7;;;rr . rA11rn„,,IIA / ' CRANJuER ENGINEERINe. INC. • Con Suh,,,y F,, 9,,, LABORAT09Y n[PORT BAC I LIMUCIGICAL i.x A1,11HAI loll of War I( I'l i ell t I.,II) [if), Address Da'I I, Iter:, M3 To La I Co I i f OVIII HVII/ 100 m 1 0 35" C fecal CoIiForm Mm -j/ I ot) ml, @ 44.5" C Jf Sample Identity 3 74277 q0 k Tube No. Sample ldeiiLit-y 6 7 Portions Set (rill-)---- III])is, qr fil 16, I® Ib 105 Tubo Nu. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1/`l 12 13 14 15 Portions Set. (ml 0 6 -5 0 1;S jj5-7 16 to to -7 to -7 Iv, Pre I indirldry 24 fir. E. C. I I - I)o r . it, . p, D 3 p, IL Dt 7 -- Test. 48 hr. lest 118) hr. C7 C, Cy CIO E. C. Tul)(2 rJo. CI CL CS C4 :r_C M3 To La I Co I i f OVIII HVII/ 100 m 1 0 35" C fecal CoIiForm Mm -j/ I ot) ml, @ 44.5" C Jf Sample Identity 3 74277 q0 k Tube No. 6 7 Portions Set (rill-)---- III])is, fil 16, I® Ib 105 Prel iminary 24 1"'- 4- Tes t 4 hr. lost 18 hr. E. C. I I - I)o r . it, . p, D 3 p, DS_. Dt 7 rflnI Cm I i I m Ill 1.11,11" 1 fill n If,' (Allitillill jjj'!I/I(IIj III I I., Dt 400 000 CNA/!M/ I I I -I .'f 1 7 :, I I I 16 h., 1k l V•..V, • ,I 1. 1,V I III (CI LABO.RAT(11Ty nr_ponT Rid I.W,11l1n11011 (If Wkif I; LI lent Rij Waste lah 111). 7/O2.o Address Uo1r io,c. 7./3.7 Saugll� I<Icnlli.y�"a� `! M3 n . : t / •,..J U,i 1 rr Noport.wj Sample Ident.i Ly T,,k * 3 7•/1.79 091 Ys k.k. fl av 110.727,Z98 Tube No. 1 7p /3-71P 09:00 .t 4 R.k. b Tube flu 1 2 3 14 5 t (i 1 1; 9 1(I 11 T- — PorL(ons Set. (nil0 (0 (0 IO (0 10 ID to (p 10 (b P r e l i m i nary 24 I I r. I+ p' P r c I i n i n a ry 24 hr. Tes t 4,3 hr. IL 4q +r is++ied 44-4w. lest 1est 41, hv. Test 48 hr. E. C. Tulle No A8 -� At A? Aq A+e g, 13= as 4 -- Ely — . Total Coliform 14P11/ 1 ut) ,I,1 @ 35" C Feca l Col i form MPN/ 100 nl1 @ 44.5° C zy0 0166 810 OPO >V Bq $h C, ca / .. , — -- M3 n . : t / •,..J U,i 1 rr Noport.wj Sample Ident.i Ly T,,k * 3 7•/1.79 091 Ys k.k. fl av 110.727,Z98 Tube No. 1 2 .t 4 5 b 1 3 n 10 11 12 13 14 15 POI -Lions Sr)L (In1 P r c I i n i n a ry 24 hr. — 4— lest 1est 41, hv. ;wLLirmed Test 411 IIr. C. C. luhl fit,. 810 >V Bq $h C, ca cj Cy — -- -- ----__.. inl'll (;ulilntro I.INI"W', I -'I to ;Ir. (' Irr,ll I.ulilnrw 111'1;/II:, I (,I T1, t 7.Y0iboo 600 CHANM( I LNG) rIN(:II INC. BY Pte. yV Y W j. At I I ! ( A WOW 1.1 i pit t f?id /Address 1— I`! l 1 1,4 r. t_ I I 1 I t . I �1- cofisull.,v E,gf,,ccrt tnoonnTORY nr-r'opT, rr,, JJ 1111r1111?10LOG ICAL [AAM III AtI)1JW VIIJIt? WQSJG ... Late Ilo. �lo�`s $r11111)1f? 1dn11tity --- k- ;0 ' kg Trr�v fJn. 175 /%t* %n•% -4 Tutee Ido. I 7. 1 !i 6 •16:60 8 YIrl Il 12 1,1 11 15 Portions See (1111) �p to 10 Io w la to Tutee No. 1 2 3 5 i 7 8 9 1 h 1 1 12 13 --- �I ri 15 -- Portions Set. (ml) k►y Io rb to to % 10 f® 1; ro' 16' !o' Pre l i m i nary 24 hr. }. {. t- +-- Tes t Ort hr. r— Laaf xmed Tes t Ori hr. E C. T11he .In. 24 hr. Total Coliform 111'11/100 1111 @ 35" C Fecal coI irurm mrti/lou 1111-@ 14.51 C yppop��,p® Sample Identity kg Trr�v fJn. 175 /%t* Tutee Ido. I 7. 1 !i 6 7 8 YIrl Il 12 1,1 11 15 Portions See (1111) �p to 10 Io w la to /B bio 10 P® Preliminary 24 hr. Test 4.1 hr. — -- — -- -- � -. � __.. •�. Test '18 hr. [.C. It1l,e 1111. D6 07 e rnl,tI I:ul i ImIll 1.11,11" (H 1111 Iti'.II f.nliln111 I11'II/i[ht ul 11 11.1. J y`p/oQ�,pdo CRAP , ENS I ^.erf� WIPI JNC I;1 ient Address c 0�1 tuln,y EJrccr, LAGORATony nr-PORT % Waste. [AAMINM1011 III VIAll li Rid was[ e. Lab flo. 9/D.32. Dale P1'I1nrllyd Sa11q,le Irlerr "y=Al®rinaft4 9 -.F -f. 7-h6- noyy kk Tube No. 1 I I_ 3 I -4 5 r G 7 8 9 111 Portions Set. (ml) l G /o /0 1 ! l to io{ to /o"� Pre1iIII inary 24 hr. ,4L 4- Coll f i ruled 24 III•. .!. f .f. Tes t 48 111% Test 411 Ill.. Cori finned 24 Irr. -#- ♦ t- /. .h f 24 111% Test 413 I11•. E. C. T 11 hr_ L No. G C` Cy ct cA co a Ds _ ._2l Irr`_ t 4- .- t — Total Coliform 1.11'(1/101) ml (a 35" C Feca l Col i furnr MPN/ 10(1 nd @ 44.5" C /� y3 Sample Identity Ci,/or;mgfed Fr --r. 7-/b /Z Tube No. 1 2 .1 1 5 6 7 PoI-L ions Sel. (IIID Preliminary 24 hr. Test 42, Ill.. -- •— Coll f i ruled 24 III•. Test 411 Ill.. E.C. rube rll1. 24 111% I Col iImill 11111"I0111111 r) 11.. r I (rrr 1 Cu 1 i f I1rr'I 111'11; 1111) 111 I'1 YS (Isny 110. !-z TZ -,"s 4 -.OS' CRAN� ENC F.r C /�NC 88 EAST MAIN ST. C 6011 943 RASS VALLEY. CA 95945 IRAN" ER ENC) IN EER INC3, C. Consulling Engineers LABORATORY REPORT MPLE IDENTIFICATION Raw. and processed rater from Rid -Waste system (916) 273-7284 DATE REPORTED July 26, 1979 DATE RECEIVED LAB. N0. -- - — — --- - d -Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. ,15 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F burn, California 95603 mple Location: Influent (T-1) Aerobic cell (T-2) Effluent (T-3) mple Collection: By Ur. Keith Knutson, microbiologist, field testing consultant for Rid -Waste. mple Site: Rid -Waste system pilot plant for a private residence, Nevada County, California stallation: July, 1978; 1 year continuous operation alysis requested) z .es Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. i Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRAM ENGI RI C C. r Aeration Volatile Suspended Solids, mg/l Period Date Time mirr/flour (1 ) T-1 T-2 _ T-3 7/9/79 09:40 15 751 236 107 7/1U/79 08:50 15 321 334 92 7/11/79 U9:10 30 1906 1247 74 7/12/79 10:30 30 2260 1104 89 7/12/79 15:45 30 771 892 140 7/13/79 08:45 30 237 900 75 7/13/79 16:00 30 62 977 134 1/16/79 09:00- 45 - - 48 11:00 (2) 7/16/79 11:00- 45 - - 58 13:00 (2) z .es Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. i Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRAM ENGI RI C C. r i i8 EAST MAIN ST. ) BOX 943 I ASS VALLEY. CA 95945 CRANE\ R ENC-jINEERIN(3, ( C. Consulting Engineers PLE IDENTIFICATION Raw_and processed iter from Rid -Waste system LABORATORY REPORT (9 16) 273-7284 DATE REPORTED _-- July 26, 1979 DATE RECEIVED —" LAB. N0. i -Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. 15 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F )urn, California 95603 )ple Location: Influent (T-1) Aerobic cell (T••2) Effluent (T-3) nple Collection: By Dr. Keith Knutson, microbiologist, field testing consultant - for Rid -Waste. iple Site: 'Rid -Waste system pilot plant for a private residence, Nevada County, California ;tallation: July, 1978; 1 year continuous operation Clysis requested: 78 18 )04 )16 )18 )20 )25 )32 1 )32 tes Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRANN.;F ENGVff ERjNC,^INC. Aeration Period Specific Conductivity, micromhos/cm at 25° C Date Time min/hour (1) T-1 T-2 T-3 7/9/79 09:40 15 768 - 309 7/10/79 08:50 15 794 450 353 7/11/79 09:10 30 641 439 374 7/12/79 10:30 30 555 451 424 7/12/79 15:45 30 412 456 435 7/13/79 08:45 30 353 407 312 7/13/79 16:00 30 370 .432 440 7/16/79 09:00- 45 - - 382 11:00 (2) 7/16/79 11:00- 45 - - 362 13:00 (2) tes Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRANN.;F ENGVff ERjNC,^INC. SA EAST MAIN ST. ) BOX 943 ASS VALLEY, CA 95945 CRANE R ENGINEERING, C. Consulting Engineers IPLE IDENTIFICATION . Raw and processed 'iter from Rid -Waste system LABORATORY REPORT 1916) 273--7264 DATE REPORTED July 26, 1979 DATE RECEIVED LAB. NO. - _ ---- J-Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. 15 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F )urn, California 95603 inple Location: Influent (T-1) Aerobic cell (T-2) Effluent (T-3) nple Collection: By 0r. Keith Knutson, microbiologist, field testing consultant - for Rid -Waste. Tple Site:• Rid -Waste system pilot plant for a private residence, Nevada County, California ';tallation: July, 1978; 1 year continuous operation clysis requested) a es Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRANY,Z-4 ENj,,WFERINO JNr Aeration Period Total Phosphorus as P, m /1 Date Time mire/flour (1 ) T-1 _ T-2 T-3 18 7/9/79 09:40 15 19.0 11.1 7.0 18 7/1U/79 08:50 15 16.0 12.0 7.6 )04 7/11/79 09:10 30 11.8 16.8 8.0 J16 7/12/79 10:30 30 15.0 11.1 10.2 )18 7/12/79 15:45 30 14.3 14.2 11.0 i20 7/13/79 08:45 30 11.0 15.6 8.3 :25 7/13/79 16:00 30 14.3 13.5 10.8 132 7/16/79 09:00- 45 11:00 (2) _ - 8.9 132 7/16/79 11:00- 45 13:00 (2) _ - 8.8 a es Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRANY,Z-4 ENj,,WFERINO JNr C R A N ER EN CJ INEERING, VC Consulfing Engineers 199 EAST MAIN ST O BOX 943 HASS VALLEY. CA 95945 IMPLE IDENTIFICATION —Raw_and processed water from Rid -Waste system LABORATORY REPORT 19161 273-7284 DATE REPORTED __)uly 26,_1979 DATE RECEIVED LAS. N0. -------.__-- _ id -Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. 515 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F uburn, California 95603 ample Location: Influent (T-1) Aerobic cell (T-2) Effluent (T-3) ample Collection: By Or. Keith Knutson, microbiologist, field testing consultarlt for Rid -Waste. ,ample Site: Rid -Waste system pilot plant for a private residence, Nevada County, California nstallation: July, 1978; 1 year continuous operation analysis requestedi a Notes (1) Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. (2). Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRANMb EN IAW)ERI,C,,IINC. Aeration Ammonia Nitrogen as N, mg/l.. Period _ab Date Time min/hour (1) T-1 T-2 T-3 1978 7/9/79 09:40 15 65.1 26.7 17.5 3988 7/10/79 08:50 15 54.0 29.5 11.2 31004 7/11/79 U9:10 30 44.4 29.5 24.3 31016 7/12/79 10:30 30 36.4 27.4 25.2 91018 7/12/79 15:45 30 22.2 27.9 28.4 91020 7/13/79 08:45 30 9.5 23.0 16.9 91025 7/13/79 16:00 30 13.6 20.9 22.0 91032 7/16/79 09:00•• 45 - - 14.4 11:00 (2 ) 91032 7/16/79 11:00- 45 - - 11.3 13:00 (2) a Notes (1) Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. (2). Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRANMb EN IAW)ERI,C,,IINC. b59 EAST MAIN ST. O BOX 943 SASS VALLEY, CA 95945 GRAN' ER ENGINEERING, JC. Consulting Engineers MPLE IDENTIFICATION__Raw_and_processed later from Rid-Waste_s tem __`__ _ LABORATORY REPORT (916( 273-7284 DATE REPORTED _ July 26, 1979 DATE RECEIVED ----- LAB. NO. ___----- d-Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. ,15) Grass Valley Highway, Suite f (burn, California 95603 mple Location: Influent. (T-1) Aerobic cell (T-2) Effluent (T-3) mple Collection: By Dr. Keith Knutson, microbiologist, field testing consultant. for Rid -Waste. mple Site: -Rid-Waste system pilot plant for a private residence, Nevada County, California stallation: July, 1978; 1 year continuous operation .alysis requested) b N '78 88 1 004 016 018 020 025 032 1 032 Date 7/9/79 7/10/79 7/11/79 7/12/79 7/12/79 7/13/79 7/13/79 7/16/79 7/16/79 Time 09:40 09:10 10:30 15:45 08:45 16:00 09:00- 11 :00 (2) 11:00- 13:00 (2) Aeration Period min/flour (1 ) 15 15 30 K?n 30 30 30 45 45 Organic Nitrogen as N, mg/l T-1 T-2 T-3 32.5 23.8 17.9 38.6 29.7 23.3 50.4 61.4 12.9 70.5 59.8 19.9 33.3 61.7 11.6 21.8 - 61.7 17.8 6.3 53.3 16.9 15.2 - 14.4 rtes Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. ') Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRANMER EN CRIIGC. WIC. CRANI --R E N G I N E E R I N G, I C. .F'�S7 MAIN ST. Consulting Engineers + - BOX 943 SS VALLEY, CA 95945 LABORATORY REPORT 'LE IDENTIFICATION ._-Raw and processed ter from Rid -Waste system 19161 273-7284 DATE REPORTED. Ljy 26, 1979 DATE RECEIVED LAB. NO. -Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. .5 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F urn, California 95603 ple Location: Influent (T-1) Aerobic cell (T-2) Effluent (T-3) ple Collection: By Dr. Keith Knutson, microbiologist, field testing consultant for Rid -Waste. ple Site: Rid -Waste system pilot plant for a private residence, Nevada County, California tallation: July, 1978; 1 year continuous operation lysis requestedi es Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRAN EN}ii1ERJNG �(NC. Aeration Period Nitrate Nitrogen as N, mg/l Date Time mire/hour (1 ) T-1 T-2 T-3 8 7/9/79 09:40 15 0.22 - 0.15 3 7/10/79 08:50 15 0.23 0.20 0.22 74 7/11/79 09:10 30 0.23 0.20 0.26 16 7/12/79 10:30 30 0.15 0.14 0.13 18 7/12/79 15:45 30 0.23 0.16 0.15 20 7/13/79 08:45 30 0.28 0.49 0.44 )5 7/13/79 16:00 30 0.13 0.48 0.27 32 7/16/79 09:00- 45 - - 0.69 11:00 (2) 32 7/16/79 11:00- 45 - - 0.44 13:00 (2) es Represents full range of aeration settings - all cells being aerated. Aeration discontinued in Tank 3. CRAN EN}ii1ERJNG �(NC. 1.111-11 A1,�I L.111 _J 1_nv l'.D Dr. Keith M. Knutson Consultinq Biologist Rt: 4 at Luxemburg St. Cloud, MN 56301 Sample Identification Raw and Date Reported July 26, 1979 processed water from Rid -Waste system Date Received_ - Lab. No. Rid --Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. 2515 Grass Valley Highway, Suite F Auburn, California 95603 Sample Location: Influent (T-1) Aerobic Cell (T-2) Effluent (T-3) Sample Collection: By Dr. Keith Knutson, microbiologist, field testing consul.ta for Rid -Waste. Sample Site: Rid -Waste system pilot plant for a private residence, Nevada Count California Installation: July, 1978; 1 year continuous operation Analysis requested: • Lab## Date 7/ 9/79 7/10/79 7/11/79 7/12/79 7/12/79 7/13/79 7/13/79 7/16/79 7/16/79 Aeration Period Settleable Solids M1/30 minute Time min hour (a) T-1 _ T-2 T-3 09:40 15 - 0 08:50 15 - 12 0 09:10 36 - 55 0 10:30 30 - 52 0 15:45 30 - 62 0 08:45 30 - 81 0 16:00 30 - 64 0 9:00-11:1100 45 _ 65 0 11:00-13bb045 - 65 0 (b) (a) Aeration in all three tanks (b) Aeration in first two tanks Cebu _bq Date Time Aeration Period min/h�,ur (a) Di s -solved of ycM I 1" ' TT1 T--2 Aeration ' .5 Period ' Date Time min/hour(a) 7/9/79 09:40 15 7/10/79 .1.0 2 7/11/79 .5 2 7/12/79 .5 2.5 7/12/79 1 2.5 7/13/79 .5 0 7/13/79 .5 0 7/16/79 (b) 7/16/74 7/16/79 (b) 23.9 _bq Date Time Aeration Period min/h�,ur (a) Di s -solved of ycM I 1" ' TT1 T--2 1-3 0 .5 2. 0 .5 2 0 1.0 3.5 0 .1.0 2 0 .5 2 0 .5 2.5 0 1 2.5 0 .5 0 .0 .5 0 Tpmnpratijrev c) TeL T_i T_'l 7/ 9/74 27.2 25.6 24.4 7/10/79' 33.3 25.6 23.9 7/11/79 26.7 24.4 23.3 7/12/79 29.4 25.6 24.4 7/12/79 25.6 24.4 23.9 7/13/79 31.7 23.3 23.3 7/13/79 26.1 23.9 23.3 7/16/79 (b) 24.4 23.3 23.3 7/16/74 (b) 25.6 23.9 23.9 CIVIL ENGIPJEERING SU501VISION5 SU RVSY IPA STRUCTURES PLANNING WILLIAM C. JONNaON, R.C.E. CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 628 MAIN STREET Rid -Waste Environmental Systems, Ltd. 2515 Grass Valley Hwy., Suite F Auburn, California 95603 Attention: Tom Graham President Dear Tom: RED BLUFF CALIFORNIA 96060 via. SIT •,!O Date: September 24, 1979 Subject: Jur Job No. 790901, re Boyd Fiberglass Septic Tank. In accordance with your letter dated August 17, 1979, the following information is hereby provided: Prior testing of capacities with regard to Boyd Fiberglass Septic Tank yieldedF results that determined for each inch of the length of tank that was added to its_--- - aid -section, there would be an addition of 11.33 gallons, considering the'specified depth as shown on the standard drawings on the tank (i.e.: 12" below top of tank). Therefore, by considering moving the baffle two sections of 10" each away from then end, for a total of 5•-0Y." from the inlet end of the tank (within a "rib" section)v this will yield an inlet -end capacity of 601 gallons. The BST -15 (1500 gal. tank) has a total actual capacity of 1783 gallons. Therefore the center -section will yield: 1783(-)374(-)601=808 gallons. I believe that this answers all of your needs. If you have further questions, feel free to contact me. WCJ/TDe Enclosures 10 Sincerely, William C. Johnson 0 N A, L A/ G zov!:La Et_&V To P o 6z .JO v�4T G�1sl�L@ Ik.vGrLT dL-WV. pp C,BEL -0-4-401 i PK . U$Pw&co Rz&%-Puaa GA+ % NCs f:L4:rrAT1cN w4t.4 Tj.yML IS &%Aviv. M1 - 2is%dvo, +Co PatSsuma or sort. Ar-T„JCw 00vjA.J41A4.P Wr/„ svarAGJt OP So,.. AST TOP OF TAAJII:„ M36 a 26&f*Tryfa P2&4#Wrrs or Sores AAcTr►JLa OOWnr..JaGLLa WITJ! 'SU2t•slG4 OF so L. AT ILa ArSOVG TAJJr6, Rs a Zisv%rwG6 Ptft4uQ! Ola SOrt_ AL:TI6JLL DOWNWwao W,rH SUaFAtt 01 Sore. AT ZA ASOVA T4y,c ----- WaTba TA.151 & I$ AT It` 015LOWL "POP Or TwaJW-. b $ m"9L {.a oar 0#016 If* AT ''SO. OR MO.w VII IM CA L 4 WtKfrwT "Lek a-%4"ILA. M&rSALIA - IS 100 LOi�GU,RT. L404v&%T r^.kAw. IL MobT GZMC.A1. S,TVATIOAJ^ 13,60Cx&#_., C-4I.GtJLAT10►.L2.j Pf a I03oo CFA 6.. 4 a.33 1.0'►/GAL � IZ,SPO 1°150& f pl iZ a TVTI.a W816MT Or'fa6. a A¢Z• OF Sart- ffieMOAJ FLI; •4 if TA►JIL ovTWAlzo X Ple.lrl6TaW. OF AL&& C.*WT9LQI0 K UNrT wT, So%L. RI a 5.3 c.'� ><Z1.IS'ILIDO a (1,'340 LAS. 4 12y4opL95. a IIIL,0 L67 t Ra scs.uav S.ob*,16 ZI•Z7',L tog a ZZIZoO taf v- It, 1504D in d),7%O LOS a; a *').0& t'.1.47,t ZI•'Sontoo a '34,;oo Las 1s IZ,Soo s Z1, $00 LBS. j CosicLuslo"I Oy VSIW& 1'0* LA.WAGL%T 'MIJW- WMILW WouLO YI&Lla TM6J e1101T GQITICAL BuOV�►w►C.1P E�.LTOi7C f IT HAS 15CEP4 ,pfESS! ptTasa,nl►.ItO THaT APPI�OI►rMAT t.Y V Or PILL Qt' 0,✓,r OVO-IG Tor OPT&LAW. Wp L.O 'bTAO,lt.liQ TH UNIT / O C� l r*aoM �i.JatRAeruL. pu To w 1vH woTArs�^ft” � Oy p, ^r1TVAT10wJy, TN1s WCUL.0 Not 64TCUlk oK gQW.¢9 oa_ Z rL&crA6 &LJLAR 4aGT1e04 TAy,6.$ '16JGa T'Nt 1!00%6 Aftova TNS. TAwIK. 11 LtMITIIO To JA MJL1.1 SAA&L+.60L C-Q.D%Ioe 38555 A� SiC.T1 oNA6. ♦¢JJI/►. .04 P^ d CIVM 4K✓� �� Cz/cvr: H/GM WArS! 7Aeca { OArw. .,(ae /db. D!/OLEY' tO'eBE.Sa IA/C. AZarA7/tom/ COMoOur4)70VS � f4fAAC.7Z 7/AG0I L3OYD XIM GLA51 #00�8 lrr __ TAxd C Up Aff v," , v - -. r.. „ r r r I I F t F 1 7 1 1 1 1 J f f r 7 r r r r r r r r T i T r t •� li!'i Lhgl'IA IO'IAL ASSOC[AfION OF PL4JPABING AND MILL' ANICAL OFFICIALS oipn, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION UP RECOMMENDATION OF TME PLUMBING. RESEARCH COMMITTEE The product described herein has been reviewed, tested and recommended for acceptance by the Re. search Committee of the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials as meeting the requirements of the UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. This recommendation is subject to the conditions set forth in the characteristics below and is not to be construed as assurance or guarantee by the Association of product acceptance by local jurisdiction or authorities using the UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE or other- wise affiliated with the Association. Accepted AT)ril 1980 _ Void after _ April. 1981 } PRODUCT: Septic Tanks (Fiberglass) FILE NO. 1215 r _ _ APPLIGA-NT: Fiber Erectors, Inc. 1450 Vista Way ' Red Bluff, CA 96080 a _ MODEL: DST 8, 10, 12, 15 IDENTIFICATION: Manufacturer's name or trademark, model number or size, date made on glassed in place label near outlet. CHARACTERISTICS: Fiberglass septic tank in 4 nominal sizes 750, 1000, 1200 and 1500 gallons. Tanks comply to IAPMO Interim Guide Criteria IGC -3 .(latest edition) and shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. This recommisndotion Is for the period indicated herein and is void after dV ate shown above. Any change in material mr`\,Iv A design without having first obtained the approval of the Research Committee or evidence of inferior workmanst.'oi� follow an equitable service policy may be deemed as sufficient couse for revocation of this recommendation. R reference to this form for advertising purposes may be mode only by specific written permission of Internoth Plumbing and Mechanical Officials. This authorizes the use of the UPC shiel g n products covered, by this certill 7 . _ CNAIRMAN'}f iFAlICi1C04t MItIFF IUPC) FKFCUIIVF DgFCTf' Sponsor of Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Swlmmin pool Code, Uniform Soler Energy Code and Uniform Mechanical Code ` ✓ CR/,N rv. _R E NG IN EE RI NG Consulting Engineers I- EAST MAIN sl gpr. 943 SS VALLEY. CA 95945 OLE IDENTIFICATION_ am0_e__EL1_5J b_y_ . __�iR1Lt 5 ❑ n' _ _ LABORATORY REPORT ;id Waste Environmental Systems, Inc. ;055 Auburn -Folsom Road _oomis, California 95650 ;TTN: Tom Graham Sample Identity lutterfield eff. - no filtration outterfield eff. - single filtered 16:00 Butterfield eff. - double filtered 16:00 Butterfield eff. - triple filtered - 1 16:00 Butterfield eff. - triple filtered - 2 3 I C (916) 273-72b4 DATE REPORTED A_UgltSl_7.1 DATE RECEIVED �jnl)l t 15. 19Rr) _ LAB. NO. 1014P4 20 C BODS, mq/l 14 8 12 3 3 Suspended Solids, mq/1 14 8 10 1.5 1.5 CRAN��NMIN(/�,Cj, //,I BY _ i 1,"I Il AIN S1 uux 94:1 55 VALLEY, CA 95945 Consv!I„,q Enyin Cfis LADORATOIIY REPORT I LE IDENTIFICATION--Smith_'Ian k effluent sanlpled by N. Wilcox Rid -Waste Environmental Systems, Inc, 4005 Auburn -Folsom Road Loomis, California 95650 ATTN: Mr. Tom Graham Parameter Nitrate as N, mg/1 Ammonia as N, mg/1 Organic Nitrogen as N, mg/1 Total Nitrogen as N, mg/1 Total Phosphorus as P, mg/l (91b) 273-72M DATE REPORTED October 21, 1980 DATE RECEIVED October 8, 9, 1980 LAB, NO. Sample IdentitX Lab #101849 Lab #101869 10/8/80 10/9/80 9.1 9.3 1.5 0.71 3.0 3.0 13.6 13.0 6.3 6.3 CRANMER ENCINEERINC, INC. 1' 11 Iti )r'i7-I GHAJS VALLEY, CA UY941I L nn :vllrr rJ L •, LAcuiIA i 0;;'r PILP011'r SAMPLEIDENTIFJCATIDN_Smith 1+juk Lffiuent sled by N. Wilcox Rid -Waste Environmental Systems, Inc. 4005 Auburn -Folsom Rand Loomis, California 95650 ATTN: Mr. Tont Graham Parameter I'111,) 7?J--zb, DALE REPDRIED October 21,1980 DA7E RECEIVED October 10, 11, 1980 LA0. N0, Sample Identity Lal, 'P 1018b'2 Lab #101889 10/10/80 10/11 80 Nitrate as N, mg/1 10.3 11.5 Ammonia as N, mg/1 0.31 0.25 Organic Nitrogen as N. mg/l 2.2 2.5 Total Nitrogen as N, mg/l 12.8 14.3 Total Phosphorus as P, mg/1 5,8 6.4 m CRANJ4ER ENGINEERING, INC. CR.,:,s VALLEY. C/� 9S94f, LAL'HA1 UI;Y PIEPURT SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION- Sn11L11 lank LffIuunt _ sampled �y N_ -Wilcox. Rid -Waste Environmental Sys Lems, Inc. 4005 Auburn-rolsom Rond Loomis, California 95650 ATTN: fir.' Tom Graham Pa ranee Le r Nitrate as N, mg/l Armlonia as N, mg/l Organic Nitrogen as N, mg/l Total Nitrogen as -N, rng/l Total Phosphorus as P, mg/l ,11(,1273-7ib4 DATE REPORM) October 21, 1980 DATE RECEIVED October 12, 140 1980 L A D. NO. - Sample Identity Lib '101891 lab X101896 ILI] Zl$Q _.10/141 11.4 13.6 0.19 0.19 2.7 2.0 14.3 15.8 7.0 6.5 CRANNER ENGINEERING, INC. r i..t r!i.ir, S1 VALLEY. CA 9:945 Coniulling Eng nrerj LABORATORY REPORT 'LE IDENTIFICATION- Smit.1-jank Effluent samaled by N. Wilcox Rid -Waste Environmental Systems, Inc. 4005 Auburn -Folsom Road Loomis, California 95650 ATTN: Mr. Tom Graham Parameter 20% B005, mg/l COU, mg/1 Suspended Solids, mg/1 Volatile Suspended Solids, mg/1 Settleable Solids, ml/l Specific Conductivity, micromhos/cm at 25° C. pH (916) 273-77b4 DATE REPORTED October 21, 1980 DATE RECEIVED October 8, 9, 1980 LAB. NO. --- 618 596 Sample Identity Lab #101849 Lab #101869 10/8/80 10/9/80 I 13 13 57 54 16 16 11 12 j 0.7 0.7 ! 618 596 7.4 7.6 i I i I I I CRANMER ENGINEERING, INC. Consulony E,,ymccr, GnAss VALLEY, CA 95945 LABORATORY REPORT SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION—Smith Tank_.( ffluent sampled by N. Wilcox Rid -Waste Environmental Systems, Inc. 4005 Auburn -Folsom Road Loomis, California 95650 ATTN: Mr. Tom Graham Parameter 20% BOU5, mg/l COU, mg/1 Suspended Solids, my/l Volatile Suspended Solids, mg/l Settleable Solids, ml/l Specific Conductivity, micromhos/cm at 25° C. pH IBibi 2)3-12b/ DATE REPORTED October 21, 1980__ DATE RECEIVED _October 10.-11 ) 1980 LAB. NO. Sample Identity Lab n 10188.2 Lab # 101389 10/10/80 10/11/80 7 9 43 46 9 13' 7 9 4 0.1 0.2 594 568 7.9 7.5 CRANAER ENGINEERING, INC. I. I 1 1 n • 1 Cbn)uli,nq Engineers +ass VALLEY CA 95945 LABORATORY REPORT BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINAIJON V WATER �yt6i 7�J-)::nn Client �I�' WaS'C _Lau Wo. f'ofml Date Reported Address Date Rec. (0-13 .6,0 Sample Identity � X0013 $U �w Tray No % 2 3�L Total Coliform MPN/100 ml @ 35° C Fecal Coliform MPN/100 ml @ 44.5" C '2 i, 0 a p Sample Identity Tray No. Tube No. s Portions Set (nil) I ■ .oma • i t Tube No.' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Portions Set (nil) t0 t0 (0 ( ( ( IA I to (D� t0 f0 102 " 103 �d 10 3 Presumptive Test 24 48 hr. hr.144-n + `f- .� -� `f' 4- "+- {-,� + _ -- y. led _ Test 74 48 hr_. hr. E. C. Tube No. B� !3y B d� g, 8 8� @,p C C� Cy B a3 24 hr. 'f rL iL "— Total Coliform MPN/100 ml @ 35° C Fecal Coliform MPN/100 ml @ 44.5" C '2 i, 0 a p Sample Identity Tray No. Tube No. s Portions Set (nil) I ■ Test 48 hr . Total Coliform MPN/100 ml @ 35° C Fecal Coliform MPN/100 ml 0 44.5° C Consulliny Enginrors •.1'.v,,iN !,1 ��lx I91bi 273-72b4 + y4'1 kSSvALLEY. CA 95945 LABORATORY REPORT BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER Client i`1� WcdSfC_ Lab No. Address _ Uatc Rec. �0''gyp• Uate Reported M Sample Identity<L.A 41 11 /o•ly.g0 49:34 /✓c✓ C�Tray No. .!6 8b-8' Tube No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Portions Set (ml) to to f0 I 1 ( log /o fB 1 10� lOt lo: log I0� Presumptive 24 hr. -f— Test -}- .� .- 4—. + .�._ �- ¢ e '�o�rtf�iTned Test ME'll E.C. Tu fir. E7 Total Coliform 14PN/l UO ml @ 35° C Fecal Coliform 14PN/100 ml 0 44.5° C f ec-Xj Sample Identity Tray No. Portions Sdt (ml) Presumptive 24 hr L Test 48 hr i Confirmied 24 hr. Test 48 hr. Total Coliform MPN/100 ml @ 35° C Fecal Coliform MPN/100 ml @ 44.5° C 1 -bb E ASI MAIN S7 O O -'BOX 943 BRASS VALLEY, CA 95945 AMPLE IDENTIFICATION - • • - — � , . I I v v , I I V L� , Con;vllin9 Engineer; LABORATORY REPORT Rid -Waste Environmental Systems, Inc. 4005 Auburn -Folsom Road Loomis, California 95650 ATTN: Mr. • Tom Graham Sample Identi�y_ Otterback Garrison w 20° C BODS, m9/1 235 200 1916) 273-72b4 DATE REPORTED October 22, 1980_ DATE RECEIVED October B, 9, 1980 LAB. NO. 101884 Suspended Solids, nil 124 Unfiltered 70 With Go—Catch—It Filter a CRANNER ENGINEERING, INC. -RA"'.i VALLEY. CA 994:, SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION -Smith WeIL_-__.. i-5ampled_1O/9/13a-b.Y-TI�- i1COX ---.--.- C,,;l$vIIinV ".11911,CCl1 19'6, 273-7794 LACORATORY REPORT Rid-Waste Environmental Systems, Inc. 4006 Auburn -Folsom Road Loomis, California 95650 ATTN: Mr. Tom Graham DATE REPORTED October 22, 1980_� DATE RECEIVED October 9, 1980 LAO. 110. 101869_ GENERAL MINERAL ANALYSIS Parameter m /1 Mill�livalents/1 Cations Calcium, Ca 6.0 0.30 Magnesium, Mg 1.G 0.15 Sodium, Na 2.0 0.09 Potassium, K 0.7 0.02 Iron, Fe 0.18 <0.01 Manganese, ion 0.04 <0.01 Anions Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 23.4 0.47 Hydroxide, 0H Carbonate, CO3 Bicarbonate. HCO3 28.6 0.47 Chloride, C1 2.1 0.06 Sulfate, SOA 1.0 0.02 Nitrate as N 0.02 < 0.01 Phosphorus, as P 0.02 40.02 Total Hardness as CaCO3 1119/1 22 Silica, Si02 1119/1 17 Total Dissolved Solids, mg/l 45 (calculated) Specific Conductivity 50 micromhos/cm at 25° C pH at 20° C 7.2 CRANAL:k ENCIVEERINC, INC. 1'nl�- l�a'." Lv.iIJ ST �Y -14 1 GRASS VALLEY. CA 95945 Client Address Ad - Conavhjny Enyincrii LABORATORY REPORT BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAM MAI IMN WATER Sample Identity & 7q�L Cff 191Li 273_"z, Lab No. D($` l Date Rec. (4q.I2 .&O• Date Reported /O. 1? • g6 4.9.0,0 NUI Tray No. S� 7�- Tube No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Portions Set (ml) {d IL f0 1 t r Ion (o (Or IL) t0' �0 {U 11) IDS Presumptive 24 hr. Test 48 hr. "f + -f +. t f f + ¢ + + + _� + -Go�ifned Test --i4 - hr. 48 hr. E.C. Tube No. 13"�4 S FJL 1j7 t� %g $q 5Io C� C3 C4 C.? Total Coliform MPN/100 ml @ 35° C Fecal Coliform MPN/100 ml @ 44.5° C /17000� Sample Identity Tray No. Total Colifonn MPN/100 ml @ 35° C Fecal Coli fonn MPN/100 ml @ 44.5® C Portions Set (ml) •i � Confinned' 24 hr. C �Test 4B hr. C.. Total Colifonn MPN/100 ml @ 35° C Fecal Coli fonn MPN/100 ml @ 44.5® C 0 0 VICTOR ATIYEH GOVFA, On It Department of Environmental (duality 522 SOUTHWEST 5TH AVE. PORTLAND, OREGON MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1760, PORTLAND, OREGON 97207 October 23, 1980 Thomas S. Graham, President Rid -Waste Environmental Systems, Inc. 4005 Auburn -Folsom Rd. Loomis, CA 95650 Dear Mr. Graham: This is to inform you that the Rid -Waste Aerobic Sewage Treatment Plant has complied with the requirements for testing set forth in my letter of September 12, 1980. The testing of July 9th to 16th, 1979, was duplicated, as requested, during October 1980. With the "Go -Catch -It" filter the plant attained or exceededd a BOD of 20 MG/Liter and a Suspended Solids of 40 MG/Liter. Having met the stated requirements, the Rid -Waste Aerobic Unit, with the Go -Catch -It Filter, is approved for installation in the State of Oregon as part of a subsurface or alternative sewage system in accordance with OAR 340-71-037. You are reminded that sites must be approved for method of effluent disposal prior to installing the Rid -Waste Unit. TJO:1 XL 207 (1) cc: Governor Victor Atiyeh Senator Charles Hanlon Senator Dick Groener Representative Caroline Magruder Representative Ted Bugas Mr. James Nims Mr. Jack Cox William H. Young Northwest Region, DEQ Sincerely, T. Jack Osborne, Supervisor Subsurface and Alternative Sewage Systems Section Water Quality Division RID WASTE N01 -1 -Mr -TIN TF -ST W UNIVFPSITY PLAZA WCSI. -,I Ill A A' `�- U.1kPW4Y.S, A1AS✓A ^:1101 P97 479 3115 ROUTINE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT TEST RESULTS Date Arrived 3/2/84 Sampled By _ Graham_ Time Arrived 1.515 Date Sampled 3/1/84 Age In Hours 25 Date Analysis Time Sampled .1413 Completed Parameter, unit Influent Mixed Liquor El -fluent 90 Removal 200BOD5; mg/L 26' Suspended Solids; mg/L 5.8 Sludge Volume Index, ml/g 0.65* Food Microorganism Ratio (lbs BOD/]b MLSS) Fecal Coliform Bacteria; # colonies/100 ml _ 410 60 Minute Settleable Solids, m L FIELD DATA: Temperature, ° C pH, pH units Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L Chlorine Residual, mg/L 0.65* Flow, USGPD 30 Minute Settleabilit ml/L — 60 Minute Settleable Solids, m L Performance: = Excellent Good = Fair [:= Poor Comments: �e *Analysis performed in lab on 3/7/84 = ��/l �n �f/ d, Reported Ey: j z��eg� �..L _ Date Reported: 3/8/84 PHOTOZONE" ACTIVATED OXYGEN WATER TREATMENT 0Z I �� rk TOZONCAcnVATE GENERATOR IN A COOLING TOWER SYSTEM. No Slowdown Is needed No Chemicals are used or needed No pH Control, Photozoneg will stabilize pH between 7.2 and 6.2 — No Bio -Fouling, Algae Growth or Biological Slime No Scaling of the condenser tubes or sheet �-= Photozone® removes Scale Bulldaup by destroying the organic mucilage and releasing of theCalclum Carbonate — [due to the non -foaling of the condenser tubes a better heat transfer efficiency will be realized �-� Cooling Tower water will be clear and odor free – - The Corrosion Pate is at least 50% less than Chemical Treatment — No Tri holomethones (THM's) are formed(Carcinogenics) PhotozorKhP is an extremely effective bactericide and viricido and will eliminate legionnaires Disease, Pseudomonads, Anaerobic Sulfate Reducing Bacteria, Molds and Algae far more effectively than Chlorine Any Precipitate will be, collected in the Cooling Toner basin and is easily removed — Cooling Tower effluent will comply with the Enviromentcal Prote=ction Agency's regulatiorw and Is not toxic to aquatic life -- Reduced labor and Maintenance ADVANTAGES OFA PHOTOLONE& ACTIVATED OXYGEN GENERATOR I A SWIMMINQ POOL APPLICATION. — Quick and easy installation, usually takes less than one hour. --- PhotozonsO does not Irritate eyes or skin and reverts back to normal oxygen when its job Is done, leaving a pool full of natural water. -- Photozon� is an extremely effective bactericide and viricide and will eliminate pseudomonas, bacteria and algae far more effectively than chlorine. -- Where residual chlorine is'requlred by law, consumption can be reduced up to 90%. -- Unlike chlorine which tends to add onto organic compounds and form oil soluble compounds, PhotozonAll breaks down these organic compounds thus eliminating oily scum rings around the pool walls and that oily feeling on skin and hair. You get cleaner, healthier, more pleasant pool water, with less maintenance. — A PhotozoneRnit uses only pennies a day of electricity, ---- The reliable design of Photozonee generators...wilh only one mechanical component (an air compressor)... provides a low maintenance service life. n Control taste and odors Reduce color Can double filter plant capacity through higher flow rates and longer filter runs Microflocculation of low turbidity water to increase filter performance Economical disinfection of problem organisms such afs Giardaw Not toxic to aquatic life No trihalomethanes (THIs) are formed Less corrosive than chlorine Less toxic than chlorine gas Reduced labor and maintenance Pilot studies - Full design, construction management, and maintenance services Turnkey project guarantees Complete project financing at municipal rates TO 0I!57RIe�LJT10►4 6Y5TEM ' I Z-4=7 I U. �................ A%I R DISTRIBUTION �� LI►�lE Z UJ X do 0 W IX FROM FILTER 1 5UILAINq ACTIVATED CKY(ZEN 0I15'T'RISU'f I OM L lWM . GCA.I.E ; 09 50' CLEARWELL ACTIVATE© OXYGEN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Y 0. w - � ci 1 7 N � Z C C a U z LLj LLI Y U � J r a z 0 o J S LLI m � Z < F q r( 0 ADVANTAGES OF A PHOTOZONE0 ACTIVATED OXYGEN GENERATOR _I_N_A SEPTIC SYSTEM. — Septic tank water will be less turbid and odor froe. — Photozoneis an extremely effective bactericide and viricide and will destroy fecal coliforms, bacteria, mold and fungi. — Reduces biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). — The Photozone�) system reduces solids so the septic tank needs less pumping out. —Clogging of Ieach field piping due to slime build-up is non • existent. -- A secondary level of treatment Is attained In the septic tank effluent and tertiary treatment Is reached after percolation through the soil. -- No pollution of the environment or ground water. —An opt lon for complete monitoring of the lamp, compressor and effluent Is available. — The Pl-otozonO technology can easily be adopted for cluster systems, as weA as individual homes. — Once the Activated Oxygen has campleted Its oxydation Job, It reverts to oxygen and water leaving no contaminants or residue to adversely affect the environment. 0 W 1— fl) O w z O N O O CL 0 z z8 40. 0 0a z 2 CL d J D W Y U W z U m z 0 z -a_ LJ Ld Q z Q LLJ s d z ONWON A:C, Yes 0� ii. z 0 U m a: 0 o v C1 C] L1 M Ci Ifl Ci O Q J N In LO LO r- z U� a 0 z z z z z z z z O O O O O :E U F- r co r- r� hr - r: co Q v N OO r- O O O O O O O o O O Q O A O O O O a O (f O O O O O" O CJ o N 0 M N o c4 M O ct t7 -- Mi 11• CLM i j O O ti CD LO � LO M a) CO co O E N m co W N r a) co w v 7 M M r" Ifl O N to CD N In LO LO r- ti U� CO 0 O O O O O O O O O F- r co r- r� hr - r: co ao r- a� a 0 M N o c4 M O ct t7 -- Mi 11• CLM CO O (V U') N N N N ti 1�G O O O Q O U O O U `e at E o o O o 0 o O O O •- M ro M re) CO U N N N W oZ Z E_. Q m U A LLJ LL C7 I ^-' s O Zi 0 Q>O � O O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z 0 Z O ? O Z '= --1n Z O N M CD N N U 1~n, 0 N ti c0 C9 to Q - p O O O O O O O O ..J v Q (y O o •� v U O O Q O O O O O O O O O O d O O Q a O O O 0 O O O O ti CO O E O M O OJ ti CO ti w co® N to r- WO co Lo c) co w '= --1n M O N M CD N 1~n, 0 N ti c0 C9 to ~' - p O O O O O O O O v t- ti CO L ti Cb (, t` N ti ti CO ti N - - LD to N p 0 o � O d' d' M d' � a y N � p N N N CV O O O O O O O O li E E O EE O o o O o o O o o .E = - u v F Z g o E Q m u O Lij U- (D E- Z -- DISTRIBUTORS OF PHOTOZONE SYSTEMS - -- 1660 S. ALBION STREET. SUITE 513 DENVER. COLORADO 80222 13031 7587834 1011111 INMINIO ACTIVATED OXYGEN WATER TREATMENT The PHOTOZONE process produces a gas known as activated oxygen. Activated oxygen is a strong oxidant with many beneficial effects in a wide variety of water and wastewater treatment processes. Currently there are over 4,000 installations using PHOTOZONE in various parts of the world. App]Ications Include municipal drinking water plants, wastewater treatment plants, hazardous waste treatment systems, swimming pools, cooling towers, hot tubs and spas, fish hatcheries, lake restoration projects, and medical missions in Third World countries. The technology is literally applicable to a diverse range of sizes and types of applications. The PHOTOZONE generator consists of an specially manufactured ultraviolet lamp encased in a housing. When ambient air is exposed to the FLOW DIAGRAM Air Intake Air Lamp Compressor Chamber —� To Water To Be Photozone 'Treated PHOTOZONE Activated Oxygen Water Treatment December 1, 1964 Page 2 ultraviolet lamp, oxygen is converted to ozone and a number of other activated oxygen compounds. The activated oxygen is then bubbled through the water to be treated using conventional aeration equipment. The specifications for producing activated oxygen are the subject of various U.S. and foreign patents. The following compounds are in the activated oxygen gas stream: Ozone, 03- 66.79 Hydroxal Radical, OH 14.7 Hydrogen Dioxide, HO 6.3% Hydrogen Peroxide, H2O2 5.9 3d �,;;•A ^¢`` Atomic Oxygen, 0 4.49 I Other Oxidants 2.09 Nitrogen Oxides, NOx < 0.1 70 The activated oxygen gas presents a number of advantages over other oxidants such as ozone and chlorine in a water treatment system. A commonly used measure of the effectiveness of a chemical to purify water is its "oxidation potential." Table 1 compares the oxidation potential of PHOTOZONE with ozone, chlorine, and other oxidizing compounds. Even though it is less expensive to produce, PHOTOZONE has 126% of the oxidizing power of conventionally generated ozone and 191 % the oxidizing power of chlorine. Thus, the effectiveness of each treatment dollar spent is further enhanced by additional strength. This is especially true of problem situations such as the inactivation of viruses, inactivation of parasites, and the removal of organic compounds from water where conventional techniques such as chlorine are either so ineffective that they are not economically feasible or they create other problems that are even more difficult to solve. Ozone has been effectively applied to purifying water both in the United States and Europe since the early 1900's. Currently, there are over 1,000 PHOTOZONE Activated Oxygen Water Treatment December 1, 1984 Page 3 Table 1: Oxidation Potential of Chemical Disinfectants Disinfectant PHOTOZONE Ozone Permanganate Hydrobromus Acid Chlorine Dioxide Hypochlorous Acid Hypoidus Acid Chlorine Gas Bromine Iodine Oxidation Potential (volts) 2.60 2.07 1.67 1.59 1.50 1.49 1.45 1.36 1.09 0.05 active drinking water treatment plants using ozone for microflocculation, organic removal, taste and odor control, and for special disinfection problems. Ozone is not very widely used in the United States because, until the development of PHOTOZONE, the generation of ozone was more expensive and required more maintenance than conventional oxidants such as chlorine. It is more widely used in Europe in spite of these drawbacks because European tastes do not readily accept the use of chlorine. The PHOTOZONC process has overcome the drawbacks of traditional ozone generation and presents a major breakthrough in the production of ozone and other activated oxygen compounds. It typically requires only 3 - 5 killowatt hours of energy to produce a pound of PHOTOZONE. This is substantially loss that the 7.5 - 12 kiIlowatt hours to produce a pound of ozone using traditional high voltage generators. Another important consideration is the fact that the PHOTOZONE process does not produce any nitrogen oxides, thereby reducing the formation of nitric acid and the corrosion of water treatment plant components. It also avoids the PHOTOZONE Activated Oxygen Water Treatment December 1, 1964 Page 4 necessity of drying the air source prior to the generation of ozone, thereby eliminating a highly energy and maintenance intensive step in the overall process. Furthermore, PHOTOZONE is actually a superior product to ozone. It has a higher oxidation potential, a longer half life (2 hours in water vs. 20 minutes in water for ozone), and it decreases rather than increases water surface tension, thereby improving the effectiveness of water treatment chemicals. Water Management, Inc. is part of an international group of water equipment manufacturers specializing in innovative water treatment systems. It is the marketing and engineering arm of the PHOTOZONE Group and is responsible for the design, construction and operation and maintenance of PHOTOZONE applications in the United States. The companies within the PHOTOZONE Group also have manufacturing and sales offices in Europe, the Carribbean, and Southeast Asia with an excess of 75 full-time engineers, manufacturing, sales and service personnel. The PHOTOZONE system is modular in design and can be economically applied to both the smallest and the largest applications. Water Managemnt, Inc. and Leasing Services, Inc. and Municipal Leasing Services, Inc. have created a complete turnkey development and financing program enabling you to easily acquire a water purification system. Our unique program is highly specialized and tailored to meet your particular needs within your time frame and budget. Our full package includes: - Water Quality Testing - Feasibility Analysis - Construction and Installation Plans and Specifications - Full Construction Management - Financing 6 Months Pilot Program - Turnkey Project Guarantee - Full Maintenance Contract throughout Lease Term - Complete Project Financial Analysis - Financing at Competitive Rates 6101.7LOYA0111 91216)(0 The Photozone Process The Photozone system is based on a photo- chemical process utilizing the energy of the ul- traviolet spectrum to produce activated oxygen. Ambient air is passed through a capsule in which it is irradiated by a patented ultraviolet lamp. Oxygen of the air is converted into activated oxygen molecules. The formed plasma is diffu- sed into the water system to be treated. Photozone equipment Photozone units consist of one or more lamp cells installed in a cabinet. Each cell com- prise an ultraviolet lamp and a plastic housing. Both ends of each cell are provided with con- nections for air and electricity. In the unit the cells are connected both parallel and/or in series. The main air supply line is provided with a flow meter to adjust the volume of air passing through the unit. The produced Photozone plasma is piped to and added into the water by mixinsr devices. Static mixers mainly 1 recirculating rater systems. .se processes )plied �d reactors 1 air nl in the one unit is e complete consisting of !lays, control 01K"Ayie1[:4r®111] 911Ae11Le lights, and wiring. For each cell there are installed a choke coil and a ballast to generate the high starting voltage and to maintain a stable direct current. A solenoid valve in the main air supply line will be automatically closed if electricity supply is switched off �^ Advantages of Photozone • Compact system • Pretreatment of air is not required lt • Easy to install ' • Simple to operate • Low maintenance costs ._►_, • Special voltages available Applications of Photozone • Disinfecting and chemical conditioning of water in swimming pools • Prevention of biological fouling in cooling systems and humidifiers of air conditioning units • Decolourizing of ground water and surface water • Disinfection of potable water • Treatment of industrial effluents • Conditioning of process water • Treatment of water as part of industrial ground reclamation • Prevention of biological growth in water supply systems for horticulture • Control of water quality for fish farming and aquaria -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 air supply flow meter solenoid valve ballast choke coil module UV lamp electrical supply switch plasma discharge Operation The diagram illustrates how the Photozone unit works. Pressurized ambient air (maximum pressure of 6 bar.) is supplied to the cabinet. The air must be free of oil. The required volume is adjusted by means of the flow meter. The air is passed through the cells and subjected to ultraviolet radiation. Oxy- gen of the air is turned into activated species and the formed plasma is diffused into the aqueous solution. ionization europe by960" 7 10 6 s._.__ 8 >--e4 4 5 2 model number air supply energy dimensions of lamps liters/min. consumption l x w x h watt m PH 190 HD 1 30 60 0,6 x 0,4 x 1,2 PH 290 HD 2 30 120 0,6 x 0,4 x 1,2 PH 390 HD 3 30 180 0,8 x 0,4 x 1,2 PH 490 HD 4 50 240 0,8 x 0,4 x 1,2 PH 690 HD 6 60 360_ 1,2 x 0,6 x 3,1 PH 1090 HL) 10 103 300 1,2 x ionization europe by960" so G! v 7 v V tiQ � C c E' yi v v u c c: -I ,� o k n U pp 0f7 _ E e ai O 'Ycr1 �' N eQ N pG O V 00 N �' 'g C vV1 vi t0 3:et� _ N rtl p Q OC m cc7 cT 0 Uj ta, y 7 9 y C •J• •y ' C '�^ U I. • A b b ut O> Ca 00O OLW Rr. O a p 5 uE Qj V O ae v 0l 3 cRa � G 00 G�i a �>ao� °" a�R o RaR�,.comaa�k,k, �23x A ^.: b^ c c U E �`i E u.UcS¢Ucnrxoy rN m er u•i 16 e< y '� • • • • • • • • v CL. 72 Ul c ro v � o •ro > � L � O [ 7 N GO v O t., � � v 'A • CL � b •''� w ul {+ G1 �• v0 O� a ti �a, G o iC7 Q.i 'rS 0.p N o GL p v E C C Op L Qd ate-[ b° ". a �n ;� u ° m °_ce ' ^ ad C u v:3 cn a v Q v v,m p �. a v v O a s vn y O> U) v„ a w J C v rt CL] n • • • s • • • a G R 7 C Oq _ R y 4 Ry >, ro G^ u, G oC0 a y 6 A aCi T p ro m a ea • • ;a'.y O GG>�, v =-a G C u v J9 y a71 W L R G p G^ 04 av ° U 7 y *' -V Ij C O G `lu •.n. O O +r N � L cr a a-G���Q��oo e�z �-�Q���� .. cW.1 G� �R3c rOro�ivv°G�; a,."� fie. •.s AcG a..• ���a �cb ._�. �:� o �"s:caj May 10, 1985 WATER MANAGEMENT, INC. 130 N. FRANKLIN ST. CHICAGO, IL 60606 (312)726-0121 TELEX 297-777 WATER UR Mr. Bruce McMiller, P.F. Frederick Ward Associates'; Inc. P.O. Box 310 Bel Air, Maryland 21014 Dear Bruce: Our report on the week of testing at Rising Sun is enclosed. We appreciate your including it verbatim with your draft report to the Town of Rising Sun. Please send us a Copy of your completed report, and please inform us regarding the initial reactions of Maryland OEP and Region III EPA. Sincerely, Ronald Sheaffer Vice President RS/mp REPORT ON 25-29 MARCH 1985 FIELD TEST AT THE RISING, SUN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT Chlorine residuals in concentrations as low as .014 to .029 mg/liter can kill rainbow trout as far as 1.29 kilometers (0.8 miles) downstream from a sewage treatment: outfall. When chlorine is added to a secondary effluent there are over 50 different chlorine containing compounds that can be formed. Many of these compounds cannot be removed by traditional dechlorination practices, such as sodium thiosulphate. Additionally, these relatively stable, nonbiodegradable chlorinated organic compounds persist in the environment and have been found in the food chain and in drinking water supplies. Many of these compounds are suspected or potential carcinogens. Because of serious environmental and possible health hazards of using chlorine in wastewater treatment systems, there is a wide search for effective disinfection alternatives. Water Management, Inc., began testing a Photozone (activated oxygen) system to disinfect wastewater at Rising Sun, Maryland, during the week of 25-29 March 1985. Water Management employees ran a series of tests to determine if a concentrated oxygen stream would achieve high rates of disinfection when fed through the oxygen -ionizing ultraviolet lamp cells and then diffused into sewage lagoon effluent. In conducting the tests, the following equipment and parameters were followed: -1- -- PH -190 Photozone unit (single one -meter, 53 -watt lamp) -- Briox oxygen concentrator producing 6 -liter per minute 700 oxygen IZ 1 (� -- 50 gallons of lagoon effluent in a 55 -gallon drum -- 3 -foot water depth in the drum -- air stone diffuser, 2" diameter, 3" high -• 3 hours continuous operation and contract. The daily samples were tested by Martel Laboratory ,Services, Inc., of Baltimore, Maryland. The test results are summarized as follows: Average Average % ch,aUt Range Fecal coliform mpn/100 ml before PZ 222600 --- 1500-46,000 mpn/100 ml after PZ 21 -99.9$ 2-40 Total suspended solids ppm before PZ 16.8 ------ 10-24 ppm after PZ 11.2 -27% 9-13 Biochemical oxygen demand ppm before PZ 18.2 ------ 15-20 Ppm after PZ 12.8 -290 9-17 Chemical oxygen demand ppm before PZ 73 ppm after PZ65 ------ _lp,g% 65-80 60-70 Chlorophyll A ppb before PZ 430 ------ (single ppb after PZ 58 86.5$ sample) ---------- Algal biomass ppm before PZ 29 ------ (single ppm after PZ 4 85% ---sample) -2- Photozone performed over a pH range of 7.46 to 9.04. While no measurement of color was made, visual inspection indicated the Photozone process effluent to be significantly clearer than the untreated lagoon effluent.' The Photozone process effluent was saturated with oxygen. We recommend upscaling the drum test procedures to the existing 31830 -gallon contact tank to further refine engineering criteria preparatory to final design. Water depths are critical to the amount of gaseous or plasma oxidants that will be transferred into a wastewater batch or stream. The following chart on oxygen transfer percentage rates per water depth indicates mass transfer of activated oxygen (Photozone) that will be achieved with the diffusion system currently installed in the contact tank. HINDE TUBING 7/16" VALVE OPENING 2.7 SCFM 0- 0 WATER DEPTH The 55 -gallon drum had a three-foot depth of water; therefore, 10% of the total oxidants were diffused into the wastewater. This 10% achieved the disinfection results while 90% of the oxidants were wasted as off -gases. The contact tank has a seven -and -a. -half -foot water depth, so mass transfer rates will be 30%. -3- 'r WATER DEPTH The 55 -gallon drum had a three-foot depth of water; therefore, 10% of the total oxidants were diffused into the wastewater. This 10% achieved the disinfection results while 90% of the oxidants were wasted as off -gases. The contact tank has a seven -and -a. -half -foot water depth, so mass transfer rates will be 30%. -3- To provide concentrated oxygen to the two PH -1090 units currently installed at Rising Sun, we recommend a pure oxygen system such as a cryogenic (liquid) oxygen tank to supply 15,000 sc£m during a six-day testing period. This change will produce approximately four times the amount of activated oxygen as that produced by the Photozone units fed with ambient air (21% oxygen). Tests conducted in the contact tank during the 25-29 March week, using an air compressor to feed the two 10 -lamp Photozone units, achieved an average 75% reduction in fecal coliform counts in treatment times ranging from 5 to 7 hours. With twelve times the original oxidants (three times the mass transfer of four times the total oxidants produced), more rapid disinfection will occur. In addition to production and mass transfer of oxidants, mixing action is critical to the treatment process. We recommend installation of: an over/under baffle system in the contact tank to further refine design criteria for a flow-through system. The baffles can be made of marine plywood for the final testing phase to minimize expense. We recommend a 7.5 -foot depth contact tank flow-through test to determine the maximum flow capable of disinfection by the two existing 10 -lamp Photozone units with pure oxygen feed. The key element requiring further refinement is the contact time needed to insure disinfection of the wastewater under flow-through conditions. - Contact time will be the parameter studied during the final testing phase. Testing during the months of August or September will provide the "worst case" conditions, due to high amounts of algal biomass as suspended solids. The existing Photozone installation will be slightly improved by larger diameter air tubing to and from the Photozone -4- u units (reducing friction and improving oxidant flow to the treatment tank diffusion apparatus) and by the addition of one diffusion line in the contact tank influent (air lift) chamber. Upon concept approval by the Maryland Office of Environmental Programs, Water Management will submit a cost proposal for accomplishing the next week-long test phase. -5- VG WATER MANAGEMENT INC. DRAWING NO. SHEET NO. 11...nrm. STP I PROPOSED CHANGES W F W L" z C3 z z 3 � O N d z I r R1 I I Ij 1 ' ISI i CITY OF RISING SUN MARYLAND �I1 PROPOSAL FOR FIELD TESTING OF PHOTOZONE ACTIVATED OXYGEN FOR FINAL DISINFECTION OF EFFLUENT GOING INTO A CLASS III STREAM r I I TABLE OF CONTENTS Faye _ Section _ I Introduc-4on i II PhotozonelActivated Oxygen Technology 2 III Activated Oxygen application for Rising Sun 4 IV Conclusions and Recommendations 6 i ! i I I. INTRODUCTION I' has a 10.8 acre stabilization lagoon The town of Rising Sun presently `I with final chlorination and discharge into an unnamed tributary which flows into Stone Run. Theireceiving stream is classified as a Class IIT Waters, protected for natural trout - 'fie present discharge'permit from the Maryland OJI-P- calls for the following discharge limits ! Parameter �l 30 BODS 71 , TSS 6.5' - 8.5 PH g.o - 6.o D.O. -0- T.R.C. Fecal men/100 ml Coliform .17 mgd Flow The present discharge'; from the plant is not in compliance with the existing permit, especially in the area of total residual chlorine(TRC). i1 range and presents a potential. threat The TRO is typically in the 3 mg/ to aquatic biota and troutlin the receiving stream. I e town's consulting engineers, Fredrick The current facility plan by th Ward Associates, Inc. call -for a modification the the existing plant with the installation of four (�+) pand filter beds with drains to a U.V. ster- ilization building for final disinfection prior to discharge. I Hoe & Beal, Inc., agents An alternative proposal has been developed by p for Water Management, Inc.1in EPA Region III, using the Photozone activated oxygen system for final oxidation and disinfection under the field testing provisions of the Construction Grants Program. The purpose of the field test is to determine the technical and cost effectiveness of the Photozone Maryland. innovative and alternative technology at Rising Sun, Mar Y I 1 TI PHOTO NE ACTIVATED OXYGEN TECHNOLOGY Activated oxygen (Pho ozone) is composed of several high energy oxygen ed when air is passed over a lamp emitting low radicals which are produc I The Photozone process began in an attempt wavelength ultraviolet light. to manufacture ozone photochemically by exposing a stream of air to short wavelength ultraviolet radiation. The energy of the specific wavelengths . used, while producing some"ozone, produces additional active factors. The following chemical compounds have been identified in th.e Photozone irradi- ated gas streams HO2t H2O2, OH,.01, 02*1 03 lly a better oxidant than ozone (ozone The activated oxygen is actua its while Photozone has that of 2.60 has an oxidation potential of 2.07 vo volts) and is therefore a better disinfectant. Photozone kills bacteria and cysts by oxidizing the!cell wall of individual cells and thereby lysing n shown to lyse Giardia cysts 1n this manner (Hybler, them. Photozone has been 1982)0 treatment systems to y remove bacteria, in ma Photozone is currentlused many organic compounds and odor,p roblems from drinking water and wastewater. Data from a Bolingbrook, IT. Photozone installation (table 1) indicates excellent disinfection along with reduction of other contaminants. 'fie most attractive characteri.�tic associated with 11hotozone's disinfection potential i its cost-effectiveness. Activated oxygen can be produced at ozone generated by the corona method and has none a fraction of the cost of of the maintenance problems associated with ozone generators. Estimated capital and operating costs for conventional ozone treatment are approx- imately twice that for PhoOzone activated oxygen treatment. TABLE 1 Data from BoUngbl;Iook, I121nois otozone treated hour Analysis naw Plant Influent _ ®----- ------------- 7.1 7.6 PH 160 30 BOD mg/l 6 ,PSS mg/1 96 120 10 Turbidity (FTU) 8.5 4.0 D.O. mg/l -0- Fecal coliforms/100 mi 100,000 2 i . i i There are currently over 4,000 Photozone units installed in the United Scandanavia, the Middle East and States, Canada,,the Caribbean, Holland, four cIm nies manufacture, sell and service Photozone Africa. Presently, P Fa Parts- Those companies are units to insure a steady supply of replacement located in the United States, Canada and Holland. 9 I I I III ACTIVATEQ OXYGEN APPLICATION FOR RISING SUN I I. A review of the data from Rising Sun indicates that Photozone activated oxygen system can be easily applied to the existing treatment plant with significant savings compared to present alternatives. I The facilities, equipment and work needed for the application of the activated oxygen system to;Rising Sun's effluent for final disinfection are as follows: The Photozone Activated Oxygen generator, consisting of 20 Photozone oxidant cells rated at 53 watts each, flow meter, electrical connections to existing power mains 2. An air supply of 20 scfm to feed the Photozone equipment 3. Aeration tubing for distribution and diffusion of the activated oxygen $, A cleaned chlorine contact tank with existing sludge removed prior to start of field test A method to regulate I#he f low into the existing chlorine contact tank to establish proper rGltention time for disinfection Water Management, Incl (WMI) will. supply the equipment and labor listed above in items 1' for the proposed activated oxygen installation at Rising Sun, WMI proposes to work under the direction and supervision of the town's consulting engineer.. ? j days from Delivery time for the equipment will be seventy five (75) y date of work authorization or purchase order. Installation and field work will require an additional fifteen,(15) days. Total time required for field test installation to be opgrational and ready for testing will be approx- imately ninty (90) days from date of authorization. df Total cost Ifor all equipment, field work and application engineering " '1s $67,344.00. Payment schedule to be in three (3) equal installments. The first payable with the work authorization order, the second payable upon delivery of the equipment to the site and the final 30 days after installation. f I I I I III ACTIVATEQ OXYGEN APPLICATION FOR RISING SUN I I. A review of the data from Rising Sun indicates that Photozone activated oxygen system can be easily applied to the existing treatment plant with significant savings compared to present alternatives. I The facilities, equipment and work needed for the application of the activated oxygen system to;Rising Sun's effluent for final disinfection are as follows: The Photozone Activated Oxygen generator, consisting of 20 Photozone oxidant cells rated at 53 watts each, flow meter, electrical connections to existing power mains 2. An air supply of 20 scfm to feed the Photozone equipment 3. Aeration tubing for distribution and diffusion of the activated oxygen $, A cleaned chlorine contact tank with existing sludge removed prior to start of field test A method to regulate I#he f low into the existing chlorine contact tank to establish proper rGltention time for disinfection Water Management, Incl (WMI) will. supply the equipment and labor listed above in items 1' for the proposed activated oxygen installation at Rising Sun, WMI proposes to work under the direction and supervision of the town's consulting engineer.. ? j days from Delivery time for the equipment will be seventy five (75) y date of work authorization or purchase order. Installation and field work will require an additional fifteen,(15) days. Total time required for field test installation to be opgrational and ready for testing will be approx- imately ninty (90) days from date of authorization. df Total cost Ifor all equipment, field work and application engineering " '1s $67,344.00. Payment schedule to be in three (3) equal installments. The first payable with the work authorization order, the second payable upon delivery of the equipment to the site and the final 30 days after installation. ii ig IV CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The M otozone activat4d oxygen system offers a cost-effective alter- . native to the town of Rising Sun, Maryland and can readily be implemented.', • i with minimum interference to the operation of the existing plant during the installation. ! The equipment and installation are eligible for Innovative and Alter- native Technology classifir tion within the Municipal Construction Grants Program. In addition, Maryland O.E.P. and Region III U.S. E. P. A., have i indicated a willingness to provide funding under the Field Testing Provi- sion of the Construction Giants Program. I It is recommended tha� the consulting engineer, Fredrick Ward Associ- ates, Inc. and the towns' Public Works Director consider recommending the Photozone activated oxygen installation at the next town council meeting. i . i i 6 ~Rf OZM E awater purifiers keep fish healthy 4 ways ®Kill bacteria and parasites PhotozoneActi- vated Oxygen'" bubbles directly into your water system killing at least 90% of all bacteria without costly pharmaceuticals. ©Removes nitrogen compounds Harmful nitrites are oxidized to nitrates. Proteins are effectively broken down, ©Improve water quality Photozone lessens biological and chemical oxygen demand more efficiently than conventional aeration. Aerate Photozone reverts in a few minutes to normal, healthful oxygen leaving crystal clear, oxygen rich water. WASTE EFFLUENT TREATMENT Photozone provides complete treatment of hatchery and fish pro- cessing plant effluent discharges. ECONOMICAL Photozone water purifiers are eco- nomical to purchase, easy to install and run on just a few dollars of electricity per month. Cali, write or TELEX today for complete information and test results Water Management A/S EDB Senteret Wdm. Thranesgt. 77 0175 Oslo 1, Norway Phone: (47-2) 208170 Tlx.: 74425 DATAS N Water Management Pte. Ltd. Pei Fu Industrial Building #04-04 24 New Industrial Road Singapore 1953 Phone: (65) 2894201 Tlx 34505 SMOCFE Water Management, Inca 9350 E. Arapahoe Road Suite 300 Englewood, CO 80112 Phone: (303) 792-5777 Tlx: 297777 WATER UR . l '• � i ! � _i' Ty St-�wtY�* - �� P.W rt'�' `� � L .+�Ili � c- S _ f�y^_.._T '_ 7r1i i: Simple, Job -Proven Our System has been proven by hundreds �� installations and over 25 years of experience. It consists basically of scientifically - designed tubing made of long-lasting black polyethylene. Its tiny air -release cuts, typically 3/8" long by 0.001 " wide, are spaced at varying intervals depending on need, generally 1/2" 1-1/2" or 3". When not under pressure, these cuts completely close to eliminate entry of solids and clogging. Their extremely narrow Highest Oxygen Transfer As the airflows out from the tubing cuts, it forms tiny bubbles, 1/8" to 1/100" in size. In 100 feet of Hinde tubing, 144,000 bubbles are released per minute ... 8,640,000 per hour. Their rise circulates the water from top to bottom in a calm laminar flow of 0.8 ft./second. The water derives oxygen from the bubbles. Within 24 hours of startup, the System will turn over the entire body of water no less than four times. This action con- tinues automatically so that all parts of a pond continue to be gently and thoroughly aerated. Stratification is eliminated, yet organic material stays on the bottom to be naturally oxidized and removed. Material is never lifted to clog fish gills. Oxygen transfers averaging 5 mg/I (5 ppm) are easily attained day and night. Little energy is needed, a fraction of that required by paddle wheels and surface aerators which may make attrac- tive waves but do little to get oxygen to the bottom. Hinde Aeration therefore minimizes energy costs. width has the adder advantage of working with only a slight pressure drop so that, unlike hole -type tubing, Hinde tubing can be placed in a grid pattern across your pond and despite uneven bottoms still produce an even air pattern from one end to the other. An encapsulated lead keel keeps the cuts in their proper upright position and makes the tubing lie flat on the pond bottom. Other Important Advantages ONLY ONE MOVING PART BACK-UP LIQUID 02 INCREASED STOCKING REDUCED ENERGY COSTS NO WINTER FISH KILL Simple Installation o , ,,a System's only moving part, its air blower/cu. ipressor, is centrally located on shore where it minimizes labor. One blower is normally operated at a time; a duplicate is usually recom- mended to extend life and serve as a standby. o Bottled oxygen, attached to a header valve, can easily be turned on to take the place of natural air during times of electric power failures or natural high -stress conditions. Should 02 diminish, a warning system can be provided remotely or on-site, thus removing crisis manage- ment from your fish farming. o Because all levels of a pond are made livable, stocking density can be based on acre-feet of water, not just surface -feet. o Initial and operating costs are less than most other types of aeration. In many cases, your basic investment can be recovered within the first year due to increased production. 0 In Northern climates, winter fish kill is eliminated by preventing oxygen starvation during ice cover. Hinde Systems are comprised of two or more compressor/ blowers, header -feeder pipe, and valved aeration tubing. That's all there is to it. Complete installation can be done yourself per furnished instructions, or we'll be glad to send in factory -trained represen- tatives for you. Simple Operation Electricity or a small gas engine supplies all power. For routine maintenance, you need only to change filters and oil. For trouble- shooting, follow our easy O & M manual. Service Contracts Available Hinde I & A can contract to provide a periodic maintenance program designed to fit your needs. Other Uses Hinde Aeration Systems are also being used to aerate live trucks, holding vats, and ponds using liquid oxygen. In trucks and vats, the System diffuses more oxygen into the water than any other product. It is more durable, costs less, and requires virtually no maintenance. By itself, our System is an investment that will pay off In many ways. With efficient aeration, you will find there is less disease. You will use less machinery, fuel and labor. Your stock- ing rate can be greatly increased, and your fish will eat more, grow faster, be larger and ready for market sooner. DIAGRAM OF HINDE FISH AERATION SYSTEM FOR 18 ACRES HINI7F "/ FAOFr) TRIPLE -CUT' GATE VALVE CHECK VALVE RELIEF VALVE PRESSURE GAO FLEXIBLE_ COUP AIR FILTER - -- AVG. STOCKING DENSITY POND WATER DEPTH *POUNDS PER ACRE 4 6,000 5 7,500 6 9,000 FLOW METER TANK REGULATOR LIQUID OXYGEN CYLINDER ❑• 9 HINDS "LTC" WEIGHTED AERATION TUBING HINDE "LWFT" WEIGHTED FEEDER TUBING 18 ACRE POND HINDI: PVC AIR MANIFOLD a— GALVANIZED PIPE (NOT BY HINDE) I ELECTRICAL LINE' i 4 POND BOTTOM BLOWER AND MOTOR ASSEMBLY e ` ~ WELL PUMP POND OUTLINE *ASSUMED DATA e INFLOW FROM WELL o MAX NIGHT WATER TEMP = 85°F ® MAX FISH SIZE= 1.5 POUNDS e POND AGE= LESS THAN 5 YRS o MIN DISSOLVED OXYGEN=3 PPM ® TYPE OF FISH = CATFISH EQUIPMENT BY HINDE I & A e 1,800 FT HINDE "LTC' AERATION TUBING • 900 FT HINDE LWFT FEEDER TUBING • 900 FT 2" to 4" PVC AIR MANIFOLD • 5 HP BLOWER TO DELIVER UP TO 150 CFM OF OIL -FREE AIR AT 5 PSI, 7 PSI MAX Only supplier we know of who takes all your pond factors into consideration in its custom design. Free layouts and cost estimates on request ... from the people with over 25 years experience in fish aeration. HINDE BULLETIN NO, FIS -85 Hende Irrigati®n & Aerati®n systems, Inc 0 The Photozone System will oxygenate and circulate the water in a lake to overcome stratification, eliminate stagnation, help oxidize d , organic sludge on the lake bottom and in suspension, reduce algae and help to support and enhance its desirable biota, particularly fish life. Lake Holiday is a private recreational lake and housing community developed in 1965 near Somonauk, Illinois. The housing development which surrounds the lake consists of two thousand lots currently containing over eight hundred single family homes. The lake which is man-made was formed by damming the Somonauk Creek and covers approximately 326 acres with water depths that range from three to twenty feet, Lake Characteristics Size 326 Acres Maximum Depth 20 Feet Average Depth 8 Feet Volume 2,608 Acre Feet (Approximately I Billion Gallons) Watershed 19,000 Acres " Shoreline 8.5 Miles Dam Height 20 Feet -1- 0 The Problem Since the time of Lake Holiday's construction, the watershed (drainage) J area which is mainly farm land has been depositing large amounts of agricultural runoff into the water basin. This sedimentation, which contains high nutrient concentrations, began to accumulate over the years, causing an overproduction of organic matter (algae), the decomposition of which began to take more oxygen then the lake could provide. This situation had created such a critical condition that it threatened the lake's whole biological life. Lake Holiday soon began to take on all the characteristics of a classical Eutrophic situation (Fig. 1). The water turbidity was extremely dense with very little visibility. In summer the algae blooms would start in early June and last well into September, with blue-green type algaes forming large floating scum patches. During the hot, dry periods with little water flow, the situation would become unbearable. The lake bottom was in an anaerobic state with the Benthal layer being approximately two to three feet in depth and dispelling large volumes of methane gas which added a fine stench over the community and the dissolved oxygen (D.O.) levels could not support game fish n (being under 5 ppm throughout much of the lake). Needless to say, this condition caused a massive deterioration in the lake's aesthetics and a marked reduction in recreational pleasure for the home owners. In order to combat this situation, the lake management leadership made the common mistake of treating the symptom instead of the ca --e of the condition, They began `o purchase and dump larger and larger amounts of algae killing chemicals into Lake Holiday. Eventually all this did was add more organic sediment to the Benthal 'layer and deprived the lake of more of its much needed oxygen. O HEAVY ALGAE CUTS OUT SUM LIMIT OF LIGHT PENETRATION CIRCULATI NO LIVING F AQUATIC PLA ANIMAL DECAYING SLI CONSISTING 0 DECOMPOSIN( AND ANIMAL ANAEROBIC SL BLACK FLOATING SCUM AND ALGAE FIGURE 1 .. 1 AMNION HIN LAYER OFWATER 'ITN OXYGEN LEVELS UITABLE FOR FISH, R MOCLIN E APID TEMPERATURE DROP NO LOSS OF OXYGEN 0I-IMNION LITTLF.TO NO OXYGEN, METHANE GASES PRESENT VTHAL XC BOTTOM I In a healthy lake, the oxygen supplied from the atmosphere and by photosynthesis equals the amount of oxygen consumed in the process of decomposition of organic material. When the opposite happens J and the organic matter demands more oxygen than the lake can produce, it quickly begins to fall out of balance. When chemicals are used to control an algae problem, the dead algae sinks to the bottom and enlarges the quantity of organic material and throws the lake further out of balance, therefore increasing the problem and robbing it of much needed oxygen. After chemically treating lake Holiday for a number of years, the Board of Directors and the General Manager began to realize that chemicals were not doing the job and, in fact, seemed to be making the situation worse. It was then that they decided to treat the cause of the problem and not just one of the symptoms and they contacted Water Management, Inc. The Solution The initial water quality analysis was conducted on 10 April 1995. Since the colder the water, the easier it is for oxygen absorption to take place, this was con,4idered the best possible time for testing. The ice had recently finished melting, the water temperature was still quite cold at 410F., there had been some large rain storms, and biological.growth was minimal. - 4 - In the deeper w?`°r, ten feet or greater in depth the thermocline was located at about five feet in depth. Once under that, the oxygen levels fell off steeply with dissolved oxygen readings at the lake bottom of 1.5 ppm to 2.0 ppm, as compared to surface readings between 10 ppm to 12 ppm. In a healthy lake the bottom dissolved oxygen levels should be within the same reading range as the surface. In the shallow sampling points there was a fifty percent reduction in the dissolved oxygen levels between the surface and the lake bottom, even in water depths as little as three feet. FIGURE 2 10 APRIL 1965 After analyzing th- test data, placement of the aer°tion tubing was determined and the manifolds designed. Figure 3 shows the conceptual plan for each of the four main units. The installation of the Photozone system began in the middle of May and was finished in early June. The northern area of the lake had to be avoided because of a dredging program scheduled to start in 1986. , 040 P VAV: YAWr Fl NOT020A Cr UNIT PE F eNo' %CzAr.w O PAKTS n.+VA% wws na Wx K.urx w,.r• 0 LJ 7 KYIf011kR TUAIN61 AIR (.OMPT41501N+ H -ALL -r T11T.LADED PARTS •MUST USC T6FLON TAPE. -PAKTa NOT TO GCA -r FIGURE 3 The key to the restoration system is Photozone. The Photozone System is based on a photochemical process utilizing the energy of the ultraviolet spectrum to produce activated oxygen. When ambient air provided by the air compressors is passed throuqh the Photozone capsule, it is irradiated by'a patented ultraviolet lamp. The oxygen in the air is activated, forming a gas plasma which is then diffused into the water. After Photozone has done its work, it reverts back into oxygen again, leaving no toxic residuals or by-products. - 6 - At Lake Holiday, i Photozone gas and air mixture is diffused at the lake bottom by using fine die cut, lead weighted aeration tubing. Upon entering the water, Photozone began to break down the organic matter and quickly changed it from an anaerobic state to aerobic. As the bubbles rose to the surface, they also destratified the lake. Six months after startup of the Photozone system, another profile of the lake was conducted. Figure 4 is a compilation of that data and clearly shows the effectiveness of the Photozone system in destratification and oxygenation. FIGURE 4 5 NOVEMBER 1985. e f5ce .0. e bottom OST _ 3 14� 5 �, 1 1, ,JA qL� /, A lk- I& ,ANCHORAGE PRECINCT MKa 196-0 Ry M.A T. C,/ 7 5 J B D V t: it I NORTHERN REALTY NE Y+, NWVt NW V4 -5�- 10, T12 N, R 4 W i !URI 00 Sch 4E 11'.100- ume 24195b 7 Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8t HUMAN SERVICES R 825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST UI- Ai r3i • • ooeu.a oo•• a a • V cava eta ami •'• r<` ; Bruce D. Pcitteraen �A N, •._ CE 5034 PERFORMED FOR: AURORA CONTRACTORS DATE PERFORMED: LOT 1 PARCEL 1 SANDY BEACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: STIED Township, Range, Section: DEPTH SLOPE SITE PLAN 9 OLIVE FINE SILTY SAND (SM) 10 FIRM WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? 11.0' 11 IF YES, AT WHAT 12 DEPTH? 13 Depth to Water After — Monitoring? 14- 15 16 — BOTTOM OF TESTHOLE 17 18- 19- 20- S 81920 S L C P E Date: _ LO Gross Time Net Time Depth to Water (FEET) 10-9-85 1 1.0' ORGANIC"S (PT) 10-10-85.10:15 2 1.86 - LIGHT BROWN 3 4.0' SANDY SILT (ML) ■ 1Q:35 DRY 4 .12 10-10-85 5- ■■ _ 2.21 .10 10-10-85 6- 67 Min. 2.32 7 -LQ--LQ--Z-5- 8 2.43 .10 9 OLIVE FINE SILTY SAND (SM) 10 FIRM WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? 11.0' 11 IF YES, AT WHAT 12 DEPTH? 13 Depth to Water After — Monitoring? 14- 15 16 — BOTTOM OF TESTHOLE 17 18- 19- 20- S 81920 S L C P E Date: _ LO Reading Date Gross Time Net Time Depth to Water Net Drop 10-9-85 o r S t ration eriod 10-10-85.10:15 1.86 - 10.25 10 Min. 1.99 .13 ■ 1Q:35 ■WOMEN ■■. .12 10-10-85 ■■ _ 2.21 .10 10-10-85 Reading Date Gross Time Net Time Depth to Water Net Drop 10-9-85 o r S t ration eriod 10-10-85.10:15 1.86 - 10.25 10 Min. 1.99 .13 10-10-85 1Q:35 10 Min. 2.11 .12 10-10-85 Min. _ 2.21 .10 10-10-85 10:510 Min. 2.32 .11 -LQ--LQ--Z-5- 10 Min, 2.43 .10 PERCOLATION RATE 8.3 (minutes/inch) PERC HOLE DIAMETER 6't TEST RUN BETWEEN 5 FT AND 6 FT COMMENTS 250 SQUARE FEET OF DRAINAGE AREA REQUIRED PER BEDROOM PERFORMED BY: MARK T_TQHNSON I 10-10-85 CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE. DATE: _ 10-10-85 72-008 (Rev. 4/85) Municipality of Anch,or•age February 14, 1986 P.O. BOX 6650 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99502-0650 (907) 264-4111 TONY KNO WLES, MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 6 HUMAN SERVICES Mark Johnson Datum Engineering 1020 West International Airport Road Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Subject: Parcel 1 and 2 Sandy Beach Subdivision Waiver Request, WR86-008 Dear Mr. Johnson: This Department has reviewed your request for a waiver of the separation distances required by 18 AAC 72.021 for the subject property. Based on your submitted risk analysis and the fact that you are requesting a waiver for new construction, this waiver has been denied. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at 264-4720. Sincrely, Stephen S. Morris Civil Engineer On-site Services SSM/ljw c ;, ,, V t�* i m�' N _ Datum Engineering_ - - & Surveying, Inc. (907) 563.3142 1020 W. International Airport Rd. Anchorage, Alaska 99502 orf y/! Bruce D. 'f ajterzon n "o Cr 503A �l D i �01 Cc. to:14 Q FOOND I Yz IV-aN PIPE brz T I x YJ/ 10 Ln Iftr of, Lu I a� ��� a J i > 1110 q ail 00 wl C- 1. or;; C� I -Q- NOtT I PoAl. Ph, 12- C L I N 171 v s "W W.. too lu Ls0h.CtA,;\ v I p% a ZIV> 1 11