Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSOUTH ADDITION Block 20 Lot 10LoT Io S August nO, 1073 Civil kJonar Pualic Wirks W Nwitur, 0c;xraqu Am duroup DOU LAS, TWor wai Ancoaray,, Aliska whY SaWary War JmoromRunc knpjaccLapt p,,,, Muffer Majivisico, QrvjO-.Qcrws Walvision, wavi,i KmOrAP AM WrImpaL,permaL Uf Mra iw"bcal Quality man r"cam. jd� mviw.,& c.o nuqm dans. an H"', Wit c"VS0 PRO KCCL wim 0.11 condbo"O awn Snica Lois parnowt IS CWHUr"A. SIOU'li you Am aNy questims rojum I i . nq our rovibu of cluse plags, plcdse colcacL W "n"Orsipm. Sincorm 1". uolf SHOW, s:, i, US Sad wrim-,, w dJ,, 1, H fl %n,. GREATER-AN_CHO`RAG C -AREA BOROUGH -3500,;TUDOR _ROAD: POUCH 6.650 ANCHORAGE -ALASKA 99502;. J- ` :P.UBLIC :WORKS-_ PARLMENT January 26, 1972 L E Guy R. Martin A Legislative Assistant N Office of Congressman Nick Begich, Alaska A House of Representatives I Washington, D.C. 20515 R Dear Sir: A Subject: SEWER SERVICE TO 1146 "S STREET (SOUTH 901 OF LOT 10, BLOCK 20, r-• SOUTH ADDITION SUBDIVISION) e N A copy of your December 16, 1971, correspondence has been forwarded to the Borough Public Works Department for answering. W T In an effort to determine if your sewer is tied into the Borough public system, E our Customer Service Section has, with the permission of the occupants of the R above residence, performed a dye test. This test confirms the absence of any connection between this system and the public system, At this time, we have no information on the type of pipe or size of this apparent private system. C L We are not aware of any proposed action on the part of the owners to have this E system tied into the Borough system. Prior to the tie in and acceptance for N maintenance and operation of any private system, minimum Borough construction standards must be met. In this case, reconstruction may be necessary to meet C the minimum 8" size requirement, and provide adequate manhole and cleanout 0 spacing. I� U Public sewer is available for serving" your lot at the intersection of S Street N and 12th Avenue. This sewer is approximately 8 feet deep. The City informs us I that the sewer assessment has been paid on this property, and therefore a connect T permit ($5.00) could be issued to any bonded contractor for making this connection. If you could wait until spring, we expect to have a contractor under contract by I — RECEIVEi} Guy R. Martin January 26, 1972 Page Two Y mid May (after the frost is out of the ground) who will be responsible for _making such connections. Last year's price for this work was $225.00 for extending the service from the main to the property boundary. Due to the possible public health hazard that may be created by the outfall of this private system, we are by copy of this letter, notifying the Department of Environmental Quality of its existence and will be making a survey of the area to determine the extent of the system and investigate a possible connection to the public sewers. If you have further questions regarding this matter,please contact this department. Yours very truly, GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH Jack A. Brockman, P.E. Civil Engineer JAB/jd cc:L-1�a'1ph Strickland, Borough Department of Environmental Quality k 14� GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH ' PLANNING AND ZONING COK4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. `S�I7 Zv 1370 oAr .. > , RESOLUTION DENYING A ZONING SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO PERMIT A P�P; ONI=`fo.��LOPNIENT!OFFICE BUILDING AT 13TH AVENUE AND "I" STREET. z"`zz�tDomz WHEREAS, a petition was received for a Special Exception for a high-rise office building as a Planned Unit Development on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 24, South Addition, located at the northwest corner of 13th Avenue and "I" Street, and held, and WHEREAS, notice was published, notices were mailed and a public hearing was WHEREAS, the petition area is within a viable low density residential area, and WHEREAS, the petition does not meet the intent of a Planned Unit Development in that it does not enhance and preserve the value, spirit, character, and integrity of the surrounding residential area, and I'MEREAS, residential uses south of the park strip are to be protected, and WHEREAS, this is an intrusion of a high-rise office building in a low density residential area, and IIMEREAS, a development of this intensity is more appropriate in, and provides for a more healthy Central Business District, and WHEREAS, much of the R-0 and B-2 zones of the Central Business District are un- derdeveloped or undeveloped. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Greater Anchorage Area Borough Planning and Zoning Commission that the zoning exception for a Planned Unit Development of a high rise office building on the above described property be denied. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Greater Anchorage Area Borough Planning and Zoning Commission thi_.)s 24 day of June, 1970. �✓ '> tGy� 2 G R. 1V. Pavitt Arliss Stu gulewski Secretary Chairman Z 568