HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIMBER RIDGE BLK 2 LT 10TI*mber RI*dge
Block 2
Lot 10
#050�312�28
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Environmental Health Division
825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502. Telephone 264-4720
ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM AND/OR WELL INSPECTION
REPORT
Name
DISTANCES
SEPTIC
ABSORPTION
FRD�MT'
TANK
FIELD
WILL
WELL
promil
Fvmd No.
No ot Boo,whis
i,dq
in 0
It)
LOT LINE
+
—
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 101
Block 7-
t"Tluw
FOUNDATION
I
Township. Range. Saction
AS -S Ul LT 0 1AG RAM ishow location GO weii. septic system. property Iment, Sounowpon.
L >
d'... a, water bodies. etc)
TANKS'
I I I F
),S�- SEPTIC 0 HOLDING
I I I
Capacity in gallons
Mawnw
NO. of compammems
TYPE OF SYSTEM
_f� rTRENCH C3 BED 0 W. DRAIN 0 OTHER
Depth to POP poilorn ftom
Total Depth 110nh Wig," Glace
Original glade i FT
I C:> FT
1p,
Fie adood aboN, W.9 -hal gloos,
Q" Depth Coneath pope
0 FT
(15) FT
'7;l a FT
2, 11`5� FT
Tottel LiDsorption at" !qs�SO FT
Distance whister, lines tJAf T
/_A
. . . . . .
/ , % r
�
Number ol
sol'a 1.9
I 1 0 SOFT
pipe material
" 92ol
qrs
ImItalle, tlaoll 0 125"1
Date Installed
I/r
6_cv.-�r'
9
IV I
WELLS I �a I cl 2 -
all
4P_RIVATE 0 OTHER (Identifvl
Ci.fication (A.B. C, T 0 Depth ca"No to
5�x It 42<1 f-1 61 TJ FT
c>1
instaile, Deis InstalsIl.
I
--r
1L -7
-
REMARKS: dapm 11 Iftft III Ar
AW
Sao; P_JI'T�Cal
�-INGIN S SEAL
I Inspections Perio(med by:
All 'I
f2ET—%
Aso.o.
P.
Date
%�F
—1 — �el
laws ..7so I
S nNOINERRING
A I ...... 4
17034 EaglaRiver LOOP Road No- 9nd cawntf.flionta1m, IMWU
... . ... ........
River, Alaska 99577
wl 5,10 !2
410 A.
.Eallis
WWII I sh Ilwe pidelinss In efied on this 11--
01 /
. . No IWA
.
-4
Health Dltparn�umnl Ap Dew
. .
72-013 (3195) 1 1 - 11
t-
J� 0 t
SCALE
9,77
r4e)e� V..N6�-
L -i>
excc-f-�6
LA
aft, D
tc�ww'
V -%L>
N.Avrul.-1
-7;7
d5 <=>I IA7
171�
14 4
V.-
'�Inmftatpfj SEAIIJ
OF At ilt
MunIcIpality of Anchorage
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
.0 .
825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 00".: . ...... ....
* 00
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
Ima A. Sh��*Jpp
v
PERFORMED FOR: CATEPER
LEGAL
7 - C>
8-
4&E &%.I.
cv'�
9-
2
C70 1
4F -4r-1
3V
if -
5-
6
- %Oe 00
7 - C>
8-
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
-F-1 V:rn6
Section:
SLOPE
SITE
0
WASCROUNDWATER
ENCOUNTERED?
S
IF YES, AT WHAT L
DEPTH? 0
P
E -
Depth to Wiler Ater
Monitoring? Cate: -a-sn
IReading Date Gross Not Depth to Not
. I I Time Time Water Drop
PERCOLATION RATE ley (mmuteS/InCh) PERC HOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN - FT AND - FT
COMMENTS s & S ENGINEKRIN(4
1703 4 cftgl- RI -w I nop Road Nft- 204
PERFORMED lg"ie Rlv*r, Alaska ns,77 CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE. DATE:
72-008 (Rev. 4,85)
9-
10 -
if -
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
-F-1 V:rn6
Section:
SLOPE
SITE
0
WASCROUNDWATER
ENCOUNTERED?
S
IF YES, AT WHAT L
DEPTH? 0
P
E -
Depth to Wiler Ater
Monitoring? Cate: -a-sn
IReading Date Gross Not Depth to Not
. I I Time Time Water Drop
PERCOLATION RATE ley (mmuteS/InCh) PERC HOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN - FT AND - FT
COMMENTS s & S ENGINEKRIN(4
1703 4 cftgl- RI -w I nop Road Nft- 204
PERFORMED lg"ie Rlv*r, Alaska ns,77 CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE. DATE:
72-008 (Rev. 4,85)
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
MEMORANDUM
November 2, 1989
File
Daniel J. Roth, Civil Engineer, On -Site Service6g)_
Approval For well on Lot 10 Block 2 Timber Ridge Subd.
The well on the subject lot was drilled in 1985 and meets
specifications of the Municipality of Anchorage, Water well
ordinance.
v
Doc CO. dba
SULLIVAN WATER WELLS
P- 0- BOX 272, CHUGLAK ALASKA 99567 a TELEPHONE 688-2759'
F
OWNER 0 LAND DEPTH 0 6 WELL
F
'ADDRESS -*/A -7f
STATIC LEVEL OF WATER F
N ca T rJ;0d'_s
.LEGAL DESCRIPTio fo I-Af 0' 1" cc'F'( DRAWDOWNFT.
DATE Started Ended GALS
PER HR
PERMITNUMBER
KIND OF CASING
KIND OF FORMATION:
""CIPAUTY OF AN040RA(3e.'
From Ft. to FL, c�F<l 17. . ?'f'4vc-'j From—F. te DEPT. OF HEALTH &
From -;'3 Ft. to -1-0 Wpal^�h
FrOm.Ft. to F
Froln-IM—Ft. to_Ej�Ft_ '04 0 From�r *p4i . i
t.
From t. t'
-From rt. -t. R E G
rrom�rt. to_�-Ft.
From6 Ft. toL_'.L-_Ft
From —Ft. to�rt.
From Ft- tO�Ft.
rrom*/'�
Ft. to- 2cr Ft.
. 'A'a
From Ft. to- 'Ft Ft.
From— Ft. to_Ft.
From -79 Ft. to 162' FL' .. .9 -
ggv
rrom�rt. to Ft.
From Ft.
Fro
a m
Ft. to Ft.
m.FL t tn�r ' Lio."
0��Ft.
Fro Ft.
From Ft:to_.��
From -
FL to___:�_r .
From Ft. to t
From
F rom Ft. to
Ft. _��J 4A F
From O's'; FL to 30c>
z Ft. to
r-;-.Fr0nl `-`;-'FL
:Ftr v -
Q jZZ.'. r,
U-��7
--------------------
wn
jg-
Z
D R
ILLER'S NAME
1-1 U N 1 L I P A L I T Y 0 F A N C H 0 R A G E
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 343-4720
0 N - S I I E S E W E R P E R M I T
Permit Number: 890198 &09(?n I �9
Date Issued: 09/07/89 Engineer Designed
Owner Name: DISOTELL CONSTRUCTION Day Phone:
Owner Addressi SR 9385 694-5797
EAGLE RIVER, AK 99n77
Parcel Id: 050-321-28
Lot Legal: Subdivision:'JIMDER RIDGE 'Lot: 10 'Ellock.: 2
Section: 6 Township: 14N Range: 1W
Lot Size 43845 (sq.ft. or icres)
Max bedrooms: This Permit: 3 Total Capacity: 3
SEPTIC TANK: Minimum total septic tank capacity: 1,000 gallons. Each septic
tank must have at least 2 compartments. Depth to top of septic tank(s) < 4.0
feet requires insulation over tank(s).
INFORM D.H.H.S. PRIOR TO INSPECTIONS BY ENGINEER, IF AFTER
OFFICE HOURS, CALL 343-4601 AND LEAVE A MESSAGE.
CONSTRUCT PER ENGINEERS ATTACHED APPROVED DESIGN.
THIS PERMIT EXPIRES 12/31/89 AND VALID FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOME.
I CERTIFY THAI:
1. 1 am familiar with the requirements for on-site sewers and wells as set
forth by the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) and the State of Alaska.
2. 1 will install the system in accordance with all MOA codes and regulations,
and in compliance with the design criteria of this permit.
I will adhere to all MOA and State of Alaska requirements for the set back
distances from any existing well, wastewater disposal system or public
sewerage system an this or any adjacent or nearby lot.
4. 1 understand that this permit is valid for a maximum of 3 bedrooms. I
alsn understand that the capacity of the total system is 3 bedrooms and
any enlargement will require an additional permit.
Signed: DATE:
(Owner) DISnTELL CONSTRUCTION
Issued By: DATE:
HEALTHAUrrHORITY
APPROVALS
SMA&WATER
IIJAINE(TENSIONS
SEWER&WATER
94PECTION
ENGINEERING STUDIES
ANDREPORTS
WELLINSPECTION
&FLOWTEST
SITE PLANS
SOILTEST
PERCOLATION
TEST
STRUCTURAL&
IVIECHANICAL
INSPECTIONS
ONSITE
WASTEWATER
DISPOSALSYSTEM
DESIGN
ROBERTC. COWAN, RE.
ROBERT& SHAFER RE.
nG June 20, 1995 CIVIL ENGINEERS
(907)694-2979
FAX (907) 694-1211
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
Department of Health and Human Services
P.O. Box 196650
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650
Lot 10 Block 2 Timber Ridge Subdivision
Dear Mr. Roth,
Request you issue a waiver for the horizontal separation
distance between the absorption trench located on the
referenced property and an enclosed stream located on the
adjacent drainage easement.
An existing stream is to be placed into a thirty inch (30")
HI -Q pipe type S and meeting AASHTO M 294 with water tight
connectors. All portions within 100 feet of the existing
septic system will be enclosed. The nearest point of this
absorption trench to the stream conduit will be 10 feet.
The topography in the area is approximately 15 to 16 percent
side slope and any surfacing effluent from the septic system
would have to cover a distance 100 plus feet to reach the open
stream. Vegetation is dense and the ground cover will most
likely prevent migration of effluent over any long distance.
This action is a result of litigation which has been in the
process for several years. It is our understanding you have
had previous discussion concerning this matter. It appears
the project will be concluded within the next 30 days.
If you require additional information, please contact us.
Sincerely,
A. Sha-fe—r, P.E.
17034 NORTH EAGLE RIVER LOOP - SUITE204 -EAGLE RIVER. ALASKA 99577
(00�
MuniQpa14 of Anchorage
Department of Health and Human Services
825 "V Street
Rick Mystrom. P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650
Mayor
343-4744
July 17, 1995
Robert A. Shafer, P.E.
S & S Engineering
17034 Eagle River Loop Road
Suite 204
Eagle River, Alaska 99577
Subject: Waiver Request for Lot 10 Block 2 Timber Ridge Subdivision
Waiver Request #WR950028, PID #050-312-28
Dear Mr. Shafer:
Your request for a waiver(s) of the required 100 foot horizontal
separation of a septic system to surface water has been
coniditionally approved. At the time the surface water is contained
within the conduit, the condition will be removed. The approved
separation distance is 10 feet from the enclosed stream to the
leachfield.
This waiver approval applies to the existing septic system to
surface water separation only. Any future upgrade to the septic
system will require all separation distances be met or another
approval from this department. Should the operation of the
subject wastewater disposal system cause any contamination or
degradation of the subject surface water, this waiver will become
void.
Sincerely,
Daniel J. Roth
Civil Engineer
On-site Services
DJR/Ijm
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAL,�'
Department of Health and Human Services
On-site Services Section
Waiver Review Worksheet
WR# PID# 050-321-28 HA# Permit
Date Received: Juen 22, 1995
Legal Description: Lot 10 Block 2 Timber Ridge Subdivision
Engineer: Robert A. Sahfer, P.E. , S & S Engineering
17034 Eagle River Loop Road, Suite 204, Eacrle River 99577
Applicant: Jeffrey R. Williams
Waiver Requested: Leachfield to enclosed stream of -
Waiver is Granted: Waiver is NOT Granted:
List Conditions or Reasons for above: jrFF EA,6,.,vrfj?r oqvA-ei4co z *774r? 1pr-
'Tu s y/Firn)-100j,
Date: 7 - Q - By: JV�i 6;6��r
Rec #: — Amount: $ 920.00 Date Pai d: June 22, 1995
Criteria: 1. Geology:
Points: M
C=
A. Water Table
r-)
N�
B. Soil Sorption
rri
N)
C. Permeability
D. Water Table Gradient
------
E. Horizontal Separation
z
TOTAL:
2. Special Conditions:
3. Other:
Waiver is Granted: Waiver is NOT Granted:
List Conditions or Reasons for above: jrFF EA,6,.,vrfj?r oqvA-ei4co z *774r? 1pr-
'Tu s y/Firn)-100j,
Date: 7 - Q - By: JV�i 6;6��r
Rec #: — Amount: $ 920.00 Date Pai d: June 22, 1995
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 15, 1990
jaa� - ALIT �,� AN(-"CRAGE
EN`4tR%,NMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
OCT 22 1990
RECEIVED
TO: Lee pBro,,mj\ng9 KP '4 Environmental Services, DHHS
11� �Ietz. M;t Street Maintenance Division
Z
FROM: D4�L M4iager,
SUBJECT: Timberline Drive Drainage.
This memo is a follow up of Scott Schnell's phone conversation on
Friday, October 12, 1990 with Laura Ogar, regarding Timberline
Drive. On Friday, October 12, 1990, the Street Maintenance
Division re-establi5hed the natural drainage on Timberline Drive,
as directed in the attached letter from the Director of Public
Works, dated September 24, 1990.
The natural flow of this year round spring flows across Lot 10,
Block 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision and may have a negative impact
on the septic system or put this system in violation of their
current permit. This issue was discussed earlier this summer
between Norm Hudec of Public Works and Dan Bowles of your
department.
If you have any questions regarding this work, you may contact
me at 786-8277. Attached are copies of our Timberline Drive file
for your review.
DD: ks
wp\memoOl
Attachments: Letters - Butchart. dtd 7/16/90
Bradshaw (2) dtd 7/16/90 & 7/19/90
Dunfee dtd 7/30/90
Olness dtd 8/13/90
Disotell dtd 9/5/90
McMillan dtd 9/24/90
cc w/o attachments: John Olness, Engineering Division, DPW
Norm Hudec, Engineering Division, DPW
Ed McMillan, Director of Public Works
Don Shiesl, Admin. Superintendent, SMD
Scott Schnell, ERRRSA General Foreman, SMD
Municipality
of
Anchorage
September 24, 1990
Carl Disotell
P. 0. Box 770210
Eagle River, Alaska
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
(3500 East Tudor Road)
99577
RE: Timberline Drive Drainage Problem.
Dear Mr. Disotell:
P. 0. BOX 196650
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650
(907) 786-8160
TOM FINK,
MAYOR
We have received your letter dated September 5, 1990, regarding
your position on how to =Vctify the drainage that has historically
crossed Lot 10, Block 2. Timber Ridge Subdivision.
The Municipality of Anchorage ..wishet to restate its position. The
Municipality has not committed the Street Maintenance Division to
pick up any new sections of Timberline Drive for road maintenance.
The division will only continue to maintain Timberline Drive from
Skyline Drive to the large Spruce tree located east of the proper-
ty line of Lot 10, Block 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. As stated
in our August 13. 1990 letter to you, evidence strongly supports
the contention of local residents and Public Works that the natu-
ral flow of surface water drained downhill across Timberline Drive
at Lot 10, Block 2, Timber Ridge, then fingered out across Lot 10.
The excavation and utility work on Timberline Drive;'that was re-
lated to the development of Lot 10 resulted in changing the con-
tour of Timberline Drive and redirected the water, negatively
impacting a neighboring property downhill.
The Municipality of Anchorage cannot support rechanneling or di-
verting of water within the right-of-way without assurance that
the surrounding property owners interests are protected. To date.
the option of a drywell within the Timberline Drive right-of-way
or proposed ditching on Lot I.' Block 2. Rolling Hills View
Estates, are not viable solutions. We would like to note, that if
your enCineers feel that the drywell is a viable option, it should
be installed on Lot 10, Block 2, Timber Ridge with the liability
for successful operation falling on the property owner/developer.
In our effort to protect down hill properties from further damage.
we are directing Street Maintenance to reshape Timberline Drive
adjacent to Lot 10, Block 2. to allow the drainage to again seek
its natural path. This will be accomplished prior to October 10th
during fall gravel grading.
FILE COPY
Carl Disotell
September 24, 1990
Pape 2
It shall be the responsibility of the property owner/developer to
control or rechannel the flow of water across Lot 10, Block 2, in
order to prevent damage to dwellings, septic systems, wells, and
other structures.
Sincerely,
'ZE�d-McMillan,pu E:�, L.S.
n of li
Director of Pu lie Works
EM:SS:kz
wp/eml.ltr
Bradshaw,.PropertY owner, Rolling Hills View Estates
cc: Mr. Jack
Norm Hudec, Project Development Supervisor,
Scott Schnell, ERRRSA General Foreman
Bob Thompson, Supervisor, Right -Of -Way
Don L. Dietz, Manager, S.t.reet Maintenance Div.
ADIT
Ur.r 3-3 M I T"Lls
,Mk", rr
SR 9385 - Eagle River, AK 99577
(907) 694-5797
Specializing In
Custom Mountain Dwellings RECEIVED.
September 05v 1990 SEP 10 1990
kTILLL I 'w1%1NTENA1NCr,
Municipality of Anchorage 400 Last 11ird Ave.
Department of Public Works
P.O. Box 196650
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650
Dear Mr. Olens, P.E.
RE: TIMBERLINE DRIVE DRAINAGE PROBLEM
I was encouraged to recieve your August 13, 1990 letter
indicating that the Municipality of Anchorage is accepting their
responsibility for care and maintenance of Timberline Drive.
Snow removal and grading is in our opinion the most pressing order
of business and would hope, substantial improvements would be made
in these areals. I. i I
I would like to take this opportunity to state for the record
my position as to the alleged Timber-ltn�e Drive drainage problem.
There was never a culvert throGgh Timberline Drive to my knowledge
or the need for one. Water was not ru6n*ing across Lot 10, Block
2, Timber Ridge Subdivision since the beginning of my. involvement
in this project. It is my opinion, that the placement of such
drainage would create a far greater problem than the three week
break-up period could possibly be causing further down the hill.
If the Municipality of Anchorage was to install - a culvert
at the point indicated, during the three week annual. Y)reak-up
period water would most assuredly find it's way into the crawl -
space of the home located on Lot 10, Block 2, Timber Ridge.
Furthermore, this water may result in a violation of municipal
septic setback requirements creating far -more damage than the
inconvenience of a wet driveway located downhill.
We feel a more realistic solution to the spring run-off
concern would be0ditching along the uphill side of the driveway
experiencing the'spring run-off. may I point out that the water
that 'finds it's way to the mouth of this driveway is more than
100 feet downhill from that house and is an even greater distance
to their septic system.
September 05, 1990
John A. Olens, P.E.
Page 2
It has been my experience that new construction in any area
is more often seen as the reason for all new problems and such
as this, many old -ones. When these concerns were first brought
to my attention I felt then, as I do now, that the construction
of this house was not responsible for the drainage problems,
However, to facilitate acceptance of the new neighbors, I have
always offered my services. At that time, I offered to dig a
ditch, that would be undetectable from the house,. or the driveway
and would eliminate the dampness being experienced on this drive-
way during the break-up period. Unfortunately, this was unaccept-
able for unknown reasons. At this point with the municipality
involvement,. the suggestion of a dry -well surfaced, now you feel
this aiso is unacceptable. My good neighbor policy is blackening
my own eye.
I hope that you will look at the problems that will be
created and see that they far exceed a damp driveway that could
be Edsily remedied. 1. .
Sincerely,
Carl A. Disotell
J/w
cc: Ed McMillan, Director of Public Works
Don Dietz, Manager, Street maintenance Division
Norm Hudec, Project Development Supervisor
Scott Schnell, Eagle River Foreman, Street Maintenance
Municipahty
of
Anchorage
August 13, 1990
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
(3500 East Tudor Road)
Mr. Carl Disotell
P.O. Box 770210
Eagle Riverl Alaska 99566
Dear Mr. Disotell:
RE: TIMBERLINE DRIVE DRAINAGE PROBLEM
P. 0. BuX 196650
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650
(907) 786-8160
TOM FINK.
MAYOR
RECRISIED
AUG.2 11990
STREET MAINTENANCE
CHUGIAK—EAGLE RIVER
We have received a faxed copy of your proposal to install a
drywell in Timberline Drive ' to intercept surface flow from a
unsubdivided tract of land*north of the home you.built on lot 10,
block 3, Timber Ridge Subdivision. We have no assurance that the
installation of the proposed drywell in Timberline Drive right-
of-way will function during the winter and early spring when it
is needed the most. There is a stroft4 possibility that the water
introduced into the soil may lead to failure of the septic
systems, basements, foundations, driveways, etc., on adjacent
lots. Thereforer your proposal to construct a drywell in
Timberline Drive is not a viable solution.
we have received information from several local residents in the
area that state the water traditionally flowed -across the
Timberline Drive right-of-way onto lot 10 and was then diverted
to the west down Timberline Drive in the Summer of 1989. We have
reviewed the contour maps in the Eagle River Drainage study which
strongly support that contention.
Historicallyp the diversion of surface water to resolve a
drainage problem on one parcel of land has usually led to water
problems on other parcels down stream. Therefore, Public Works
sees no viable aleternative except to require to return the stream
to its natural course across Lot 10, Block 2, Timber Ridge Sub-
division by replacing the culveri across Timberline Drive and
maintaining the flow through the lot. This work must be
a
August 14, 1990
Carl Disotell
Page 2
completed by September 15, 1990 or Public Works Maintenance Staff
will return the water to its natural channel across Lot 10 and
bill you for the cost of the work.
YS'nce lyl
c
J 0
ohn A. Olnes, P.E.
c t i g
Acting Municipal Engineer
JAO/NJH/gfc
wp/jao/59
cc: Ed McMillant Director of Public Works
Don Dietz, Managerr Street Maintenance Division
Norm Hudec, Project Development Supervisor
��Scott Schnellr Eagle River Foreman, Street Maintenance
Municipality
of
Anchorage
July 30, 1990
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
(3500 East Tudor Road)
Mr. Jack Bradshaw
19211 Upper Skyline Drive
Eagle River, AK 99577
Dear Mr. Bradshaw:
'Re: Diversion of Drainage
in Erosion
if ff
P. 0. BOX 196650
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650
(907) 78&8160
TOM FINK
MAYOR
in Timberline Drive Resulting
lie have received your Iletters dated July 16 ' and July 19,
1990, concerning the, diveriion of surface water by a home
builder, Mr. Carl Disotell. Although the Municipality has
spent a considerable amount of time and effort attempting
ic'i�a�ity has no enforcement
to resolve this issue, the-Mun
authority in Eagle River in matters concerning on-site
drainage. A property owner/builder in Eagle River obtains
a Land Use Permit from Public Works; however, this only
ensures proper utilization of the land and not conformance
with the Uniform Building Code.
Norm Hudec of my staff and Bob Thompson from the Street
maintenance Division have met with Mr. Disotell and your
wife in an attempt to resolve this problem. Staft has also
kept you informed of any new offers by Mr. Disotell to resolve
your concerns. However, our ability to help resolve this
issue is limited. Because Eagle River is not included within
the Anchorage Building Safety Service Area, we have no
authority on private property. Mr. Disotell has been
instructed to not divert drainage into the public right-of-way
(Timberline Drive), and he has complied.
How Mr. Disotell plans to deal with the water once it reaches
his private property is at his discretion. We have not
analyzed any program of Mr. Disotell's and make no implication
of the effectiveness of what he may propose. Typically,
drainage matters of this type are resolved a number of ways,
including:
Mr. Jack Bradshaw
July 30, 1990
Page 2
a. Maintaining existing (historical) drainage patterns
b. Rerouting drainage patterns
C. Piped systems
d. Dry wells
Mr. Disotell has these options and others at his discretion
once the water is on private property.
In your letter, you refer to an illegal diversion. I am
unaware of Mr. Disotell's violation of any enforceable code,
ordinance, or law. You also refer to damage. Damage between
private parties is a civil matter.
I do not have specific solutions for your concerns, but
it is the voters in Eagle River who control what authority
this department has in these matters, and we must comply
with that direction. A geotechnical engineer may be able
to provide answers to your questions concerning surface
and subsurface water flow on your lot.
Sincerely,
Ross B. Duniee, P6E
Municipal Engineer
RBD: ed
cc: Ed McMillan, Director of Public Works
Norm Hudec, Private Development Supervisor
John Olnes, Design Supervisor
Don Dietz, Manager, Street Maintenance Division
Scott'Schnell? Eagle River Foreman, Street Maintenance
. . .6
0
J. Y. Bradshaw
19211 Upper Skyline Drive
Eagle River, AK 99577
Home 696-1748
Work 786-7443
Mr. Pvss Dunfee. Municipal Engineer
Devar Lmenr of Pub I I C Works
mun I c; i pa I i tv of Anchorage
Anchcrage. At.
Dear Eir:
HEM
JUL 20 1990
OFFICE OF T14E MUNICIPAL ENG'NEET
MUNICIPALITY OF ANVORAGE
July 19. 1990
As a follow-up to my letter of July 16 concerning a drainage
problem in Eagle River that impacts my property, enclosed is a
statement tr"om the owner of the property adjacent to tne
watercourse diversion, testifying to the pre -diversion location
and the timing of the diversion after the sale of the property
through which the natural watercourse flowed. Gott, Mr- Butchart
and myself are available to answer any additional questions on
this matter.
ioci, fort -surd to a satisfactory resolution of this problem,
anc await a sLatement from you as, to. how your, DeoartmenL intends
Lu pr uceet! f rom here.
aincerely
cc. (lorm Heudec
Bob Thompson
k Y. Bradshaw
To Whcm It [lay Concern: 16 Julw 1990
I own the property at 191U2 Timberline Drive (Lot 9, Block 2,
Timber Ridge Subdivision) Eagle River, Alaska. When the lot di-
rectl'U to the west (Lot 10, Block 2) was offered for sale I
considered purchasing it. I did not make an offer on the property
for two reasons. First, there was a small natural stream which
flowed across Timberline Dr. continuing down through the center
of the lot and secondly, the well log indicated the well was a
very marginal producer. It is my understanding that the lot was
sold in the spring of 1589.
In the summer of 1989 someone took a backhoe or small bull-
dozer and rerouted the natural spring 50 that it would not flow
thorough the lot in question. The stream was diverted 50 that it
runs along the north side of Timberline Dr. to a point approxi-
mateIg 100 yards west beform 'it CrO55es Timberline.0r.
In the fall, prior to freeze up, Disotell Construction
cleared a portion of the lot and laid the foundation for a new
house. The foundation of the house was'placed over the area where
the stream had run prior to it being diveeted.
It is My understanding that the diversion of the stream has
caused some erosion damage to the property and driveway of a
homeowner below and to the west of the area where the stream now
crosse5 Timberline Dr.
gam'es r%'Butchart
19412 Timberline Dr.
Eagle River, Al: SS577
(307)-634-5700
T,3 , E
mW M
JUL 16 19go J. Y. Bradshaw
19211 Upper Skyline Drive
OMCE OF THE MUNICIPAL ENG114EU Eagle River, AK 99577
MUNICIPALITY OF AN001GE Home 696-1748
Work 786-7443
July 16, 1990
Mr. Ross Dunfee, Chief Engineer
Department of Engineering and Drainage
Municipality of Anchorage
Anchorage, AK
Dear Sir:
I have been in contact with your Department since April in
an attempt to resolve a drainage problem impacting my home in
Eagle River. The cause of the problem is diversion of a natural
watercourse by a private developer, Mr Carl Disotell. Because
this problem is still not resolved, and because the most recently
proposed solution worked*out by the developer.and Mr Norm Heudec
of your department has some'potentially serious problems, I am
bringing this matter to your attention for your consideration and
input. The background to the problem and the chronology of
attempts to resolve it are outlined'below.
The drainage problem began last -summer with preliminary site
preparation of Lot 10, Block 2. At that time the site was boggy,
and had standing water fed by a small watercourse that ran
through narrow, but well-defined channels cut across the lot
above. on the up hill side of Timberline Drive. This watercourse
crossed Timberline Drive at a high angle via a 4" black PVC -pipe
that was buried in the roadbed, then flowed onto the site in
quescion. From here the water ponded in an area w -here the ground
surface had been disturbed, then flowed down a broddly defined
drainage between undisturbed high ground to the west, and high
grouna represented by fill from a house site to the east, ending
up in the ditch along upper Skyline Drive, 10-20'.up slope of the
culvert beneath my driveway.
This watercourse is the main surface expression of a
drainage basin bounded to the east by Upper Skyline Drive (and
its uphill continuations) and by a prominent ridge to the west.
Surface flow generally exists fbr several months of the year,
during break-up, and subsequent periods of heavy rainfall.
The existing watercourse was diverted approximately I month
'before construction of the house site began. Instead of crossing
Timberline Drive, the watercourse was rechanneled to run down the
roadbed, within the established municipal right of way. it
appeared a bdck hoe,was used to construct a channel for water to
run down the.uuhill side of the roadbed.
The diverted watercourse ran west down TiMDerline Drive to a
low point, crossed the road, then took a course across the middle
part of Lot 11. Block 2, across the eastern ccrner of my lot (Lot
1, Black 2), ending up just uphill of the culvert on upper*
Skyline Drive at the end of my driveway. (Part of this path has
recently been modified by a third party-- the inuch reduced summer
flow is now diverted off Timberline Drive at a higher point, but
still lies in the fall -line above my property).
I first noted the diversion of the drainage last August
(1989). during the Period of heavy rainfall. At this tinie rhere
was a 5+ gal Ion/minute continuous surface flow down the foresteo
slope above my driveway (where there had been no flow oefore).
ending in a waterfall that ran off the low batil. at the end of the
driveway. I traced this surface flow directly up slope to
Timberline Drive. and front there to the watercourse diversion.
Durinq this same period, an artesian spring developed along the
foot of the bank into which the driveway is cur,. Due to the high
water table. and resulting high water pressure, the batik became
destabilized and began to slump as a result of liquefaction.
As a professional geologist, I interpret the high water
table to be the result of local charging of a shallow aquifer. 1
believe that the charging is caused by the much increased surface
runoff above my property, which is now carrying runoff from the
entire drainage basin. This conclusion is supported by 2 rather -
straightforward observations: 1) the soils are generally shallow
and are quite permeable in this area (0-20' of colluviuln
overlying bedrock), suggesting that the effects of surface runoff
on the local water table can be significant; and 2) previously,
there was no surface,�Jroff.in.the area front which a shallow,
localized aquifer could be charged *
Because of the problem with soil liquefaction, protection of
my batik against erosion woul - d involvp rather expensive drainage
engineering and major construction..,.Furthermore, future
additional development of properties up hill could substantially
increase runoff, and thereby further threaten impact on
additional Parts of my property, including my house.
In September (1989), with excavation of the building site
clearly taking place within the original watercourse, and no
provision being made for its eventual reestablishment, I was
sufficiently concerned to telephone the Municipali�y to enquire
about zoning or other drainage code enforcement as.a remedy for
the drainage problem. I was referred to Mr Heudec, who
attributed the surface runoff problem to unusually high rainfall,
and associated general saturation of the water table. He further
noted that drainage disputes generally had to be solved by civil
litigation, and could offer me no real help.
Subsequently, whil ' e inspecting the construction site, I met
the future owrlers (Mr and Mrs Jeff Williams) who had contracted
Disotell for the construction Project. I voiced my concern to
them about the drainage problem', and they promised to speak to
the contractor about it to seek a remedy. I figured then that
the problem had been resolved.
However-, during breakup this spring a significant volume of
water again flowed down the diverted watercourse. Throughout
most of March, April, and May there was a continuously flowing
waterfall at the end of the driveway, and a flow of several
gallons per -minute from the artesian spring in the baifl� into
which the driveway is cut. The bank began to recede at a rapid
rate (since last year it has receded approximately 2 feet). The
driveway itself subsequently became destabilized due to the high
waLer Lable, arid became deeply rutted, arid at times d if f iCUl t to
travel, requiring repeated dodging and filling of sink -holes.
On seeing the problem of the previous Fall worsen, arid that
nothing had been done to control runoff, I contacted Mi Disatell
in late March (1990) to complain about the situation. He
expressed surprise that his diversion of the watercourse was
causing down -stream damage, noted that this was the first he'd
heard of it, arid promised to rectify the situation within a few
weeks, once sufficient snow had melted for him to bring heavy
equipment onto the site. A follow-up call two weeks later
brought a similar response. Finally, five weeks after first
contacting him, Disotell stated that he would not reroute the
watercourse back onto his own lot, due to problems with the
position of the leach field and utility corridor.
As a substitute to restoring the drainage to its original
pathway, Disotell offered to use a bulldozer and back hoe to
channel the surface runoff along the top of my property, and thus
divert it away from my driveway. I refused this offer inasmuch
as the ma.in impact on my property is bank erosion from the
elevated water table; rerouting only the lowest portion of the
watercourse is not likely to solve the problem, and trenching at
this low point might ig.fact exacerbate the problem.
On reaching an iriroasse.with Disotell, I contacted Norm
Heudec again, as well as Bob Thompson and others in the Municipal
Right of way Department. An on site meeting was held in mid-May,
and involved Disotell, my wife, and personnel from the
Engineering/Drainage and Right of way'Departments. At this time
there was general agreement that (Ij a pre-existing watercourse
had been diverted onto the Municipal right of way; and (2) damage
had been done to my property as a result of this diversion.
However, there was no agreement as to how the problem should be
resolved. Various schemes were discussed, including
a) requiring Disotell to restore the watercou.rse to its
original pat ' hway;
b) establishing a drainage right of way along,the diverted
watercourse, in essence legalizing its course;
c) obtaining a drainage easement and modifying the
watercourse so that it would flow entirely across the adjacent
property (lot 11, block 2); and
d) constructing a dry well into which to channel the
drainage, in essence tr.ansferring the entire surface flow into
the water table.
Two different concerns were to be addressed by these
options: 1) formalization of the status of the discharge of
runoff onto and off of the municipal right of way, and 2)
mitigation of the damage to my property. From my perspective
option a) is the most desirable; it returns the drainage to i�s
natural course and thus has the least potential impact on
adjacent properties. Option b) clearly does not mitigate the
impact.of the diverted watercourse.on my property; even in the
case of option c) the watercourse would still run above my
property, and would charge the same ground water aquifer. option
d) poses a number of questions, the most important being i) where
is the most appropriate place to site a dry well? ii) is the soil
there able to handle the water volume and peak flow rates of the
1�
watercourse? and iii) might such dramatic charging of the water
table adversely impact down slope property owners? these
concerns were raised at the on site meeting after Disotell
suggested option d) as a solution.
It was my understanding from Norm Heudec that the developer
was subsequently given until June 30, 1990 to find and implement
;4
a solution to the problem that would be acceptable to all
parties. My impression was that Disotell was pursuing option c)
(see above), but either could not reach the out of town pr -operty
owner, or could not obtain permission for the required easement..
In any event, no solution had been offered by the deadline, and
thus a second meeting was held July 10, 1990 to further discuss
the problem. It should be noted that I was not invited to attend
this meeting, and had no input in the discussions. In a phone
conversation with Norm Heudec following the meeting, I was told
that Disotell had been given the go-ahead to construct a dry well
as a solution to the problem.
I have major concerns regarding the suitability of a dry
well to resolve the present problem, and would like to know what
additional facts have come to light to alter the reservations
expressed about such a scheme at the on site meeting in mid -May.
I question whether any serious consideration has been given to
the physical requiremeAts of such a system. Because of the large
volume of water involved (see below), and because of the
potential adverse affects on adjacent properties, I submit that
the developer should be required.�q produce results of
engineering and hydrolbgic feasibili'�;y studies prior to
construction of the proposed dry weTl. It would certainly seem
appropriate that if the municipality has sign -off authority on a
major drainage project such as this, particularly one in which a
substantial watercourse is being modified, it would scrutinize
the plans carefully.
The watercourse in question channels most of the surface
runoff from a well defined drainage basin. It is 1known to carry
significant volumes of water during spring break-Vp and
subsequent periods of high rainfall. Surface water flow at the
end of my driveway this spring averaged at least 2-3+
gallons/minute, and flowed at this rate for 2+ months.
Considering that a significant portion of the.diverted flow
entered the water table between the point of its diversion at
Timberline Drive and my property, the flow into Disotell's
proposed dry well would certainly be higher. That is a lot of
water. Is itireasonable to suppose that this volume and flow of
I
water can be dissipated by a dry well sunk into only 12 feet of
colluvium that rests on impermeable bedrock? I doubt it.
Furthermore, if the chief drainage problem now is the
impact from elevated ground water, what sense does it make to
intentionally load the water table up slope from an area of
demonstrated.sensitivity to high ground water levels?
Norm Heudec has stated that the dry well option is
acceptable to him from an engineering standpoint. I would like a
second opinion from you, in writing, if this is your Department's
position. I ain seeking a permanent solution to this problem, not
a series of stop -gap measures employed on a trial and error basis
over a couple year period. My wife and I have been patient in
seeking a fair solution to this problem, but honestly teel that
our interests as homeowner/taxpayers who have suffered real
damage as a result of the illegal diversion of water onto the
municipal right of way, are not being looked after. We feel that
'the municipality has bent over backwards to accommodate the
interests of the developer whose short-cuts and careless actions
are at the root of this problem. A simple cease and desist order
to stop discharge of the diverted drainage onto the right of way
could have solved this problem months ago.
I look forward to hearing your position on this matter, and
for your input in helping us to resolve this problem.
Sincerely
cc. Norm Heudec
Bob Thompson
Y. Bradshaw
Municipality of Ancho -.,e SEP 13 N16
on -Site Water and Wastewater Pro ra
(907) 343-7904
Parcel I.D. 050-321-28
1
"I
Certificate of On -Site Systems Approv9_1
� I E I
Expiration Date:
GENERAL INFORMATION Timber Ridge. Block 2, Lot 10.
Complete legal description —
;+ AA � 19336 Timberline Drive.
L-OCaL on ks e a � e
Current Property owner(s) Randall H Chandler JR. Day phone
Mailing address 19336 Timberline Drive. Eagle River, AK 9957T
Real Estate Agent
2. TYPE OF DWELLING:
Fx] Single Family (w/wo ADU)
7 Duplex
E] Multiple Dwellings (Single Family and/or Duplex)
3. NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3
Day phone
4. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY:
TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL:
1ndividual Well
El
Individual
Individual Water Storage
F-1
Holding Tank
Community Class Well
F�
Community
El
Public Water System
F�
Public Sewer
0
WaiverlVariance request for:
Received Date:
COSA to be released to the engineer, unless otherwise requested by the engineer.
COSA Fee $ Waiver Fee $
Date of Payment C� ltq4 Date of Payment
Receipt Number (3 1 q -7`5 Receipt Number
COSA # 045cl lolq I I Waiver #
5. STATEMENT OF INSPECTION BY ENGINEER
As certified by my seal affixed hereto and 2S of the validation date shown below, I verify that my investigation, based on procedures outlined
in the CerJficate of -On -Is N. System$ Approval Guidelines for this application. shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater
disposal system is (are) safe, functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. I further verify that
based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and inspection. the on-site water supply
and/or wastewater disposal system is(are) in compliance with all applicable Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at
the time of installation.
In Conducting an adequacy test, I attempt to provide a thorough, conscientious engineering analysis of the system fnocardance with MoA COSA
guidelines and regulations. The reported results describe the performance ofthe system under the conditions encountered at the time of the test,
and separation distances measured to readily identifiable features. The operational life of all wells and septic systems depend on the local soil
condition, ground water levels that may fluctuate during the year, and the water usage of the family being served by the system. These conditions
are outside the control of the evaluator of this system. All systems eventually fail and satisfactory test results do not guarantee future
perlbrn-121nce of the system, nor do they guarantee that there are no hidden defects or encroachments. Therefore we cannot provide any warranty
for future performance, nor can we estimate remaining life of the system. The content of this report is for the sole benefit of the owner listed
above.
Name of Firm Pannone Engineering Services LLC
Address P.C. Box 100217, Anchorage Alk. 99510
Engineer's Printed Name Steven R Pannone
6. DSD SIGNATURE
System #1 Approved for Z bedrooms
System #2 Approved for _ bedrooms
Disapproved
Phone (907) 272-8218
Date 9/13/2016
- -
o7S �- �
0 A�
F
Awk'li�
..... .. .......
.S ve _. annone
81 9
Conditional approval for — bedrooms, with the following stipulations:
Original Certificate Date:
The Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Division (DSD) issues Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval (COSA) based only
upon the representations given in paragraph 5 by an independent professional civil engineer registered in the State of Alaska. The Municipality
of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions in the professional engineer's work.
ATTACHMENTS:
COSA Checklist X Nitrate Advisory
Septic System Advisory Arsenic Advisory
Well Flow Advisory Other
COSA bl.� sheet_� - ., c
If more than 1 septic system is on the lot:
COSA Checklist# I of
Structure served by this system I
Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval Checklist,
Legal Description: Timber Ridge. Block 2, Lot 10. Parcel ID: 050-321728
A. WELL DATA
Well type Private If A, B, or C provide PWSID # Well Log (Y/N) Y
Date completed April 1985 Sanitary'seal (Y/N) Y Wires,prolperly protected (Y/N) Y
Total depth 300 ft. Cased to 18 ft. Casing height (above ground) 12+' in.
FROM WELL LOG AT INSPECT10N
Date of test April 1985 8/19/2016
Static water level 35 24 -
Well production 0.75 9 p M 1.0 9 P.M
WATER SAMPLE RESULTS:
Coliform A*Colonies/100 mL NitrateS. 7 mg/L
Arsenic &b ug/L -Dateof sample: 2�&/_XOI Coll/ ected by:
B. SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK DATA
Tank Typ'e/Mater i., Septic/Steel Date installed 9/9/1989
Tank size 1000 gal. Number of Compartments 2 Cleanouts (Y/N) Y
Y N N
Foundation cleanout (Y/N) Depression over tank (Y/N) — High water alarm (Y/N)
Date of pumping" 8/18/2016 Pumper JR's Pumping
C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA
Date installed 9/9/1989 Soil rating (g.p.d./ft 2 or ft 2 /bdrm) 150 SF/bdrm System type Trench
Length 38 ft. Width 2.5 ft. Gravel be'low pipe 6 ft.
Total depth 11 .3 ft. '. Eff. absorption area 456 ft2 Monitoring tube Y Depression over field N
Date of adequacy test 8/19/2016 Results (Pass/Fail) Pass For 3 bedrooms
Fluid depth in absorption field before test 0 in. Wat'erad6ed474 gal. 'New depth 0 'in.
Elapsed Time: 150 min. Final fluid depth 0 in. Absorlptionrate >= 450+ g.p.d
Any rejuvenation treatment (past 12 mo.),(Y/N & type) No If yes, give date
D. LIFT STATION
Date installed Size in gallons Manhole/Access (Y/N)
"Pu mp on" level at in. "Pump off" level at in. High water alarm level at in.
Datum Cycles tested Me6ts alarm & circuit requirements?
E. SEPARATION DISTANCES
WELL ON LOT TO:
Septic tank/lift station on lot 100+ On adjacent lots 100+
o' 100+ 100+
Absorption field on I t On �djacent lots
Public sewer main 75+ Public sewer ma . nhole/cleanout 100+
Sewer /septic service line 25+. Holdingtank 100+
50+ 100+
Animal containment areas Manure/animal excrete storage areas
SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK ON LOT TO:
Building foundation 5+ Property line 5+ Absorption field 5:1�
Watermain 10+ 10+ Surface ater 100+
Water service line w
Wells on adjacent]ots 00+
ABSORPTION FIELD ON LOT TO:
Property line 10+ 10+ 10+
Building foundation Water main
10+� 100+
Water Service line Surface water Driveway, parking/vehicle storage 10
50+ 100+
Curtain drain Wells on adjacent lots
F. COMMENTS
G. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
certify that / have determined through field inspections and
review of Municipal records that the above systems are in
conformance with MOA COSA guidelines in effect on this date.
Engineer's Printed NameSteven Pannone
Date 9/13/2016
COSA �nary sheet-2-6-15.doc
A. -
AW
Aw
e n annon
CE -8149
A
OAV
Municipality of Anchorage
Development Services Department
Building Safety Division
On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
4700 Elmore Street
P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 99519-6650
www.muni.org/onsite
(907) 343-7904
Nitrate Advisory
Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval # 050-321-28
A Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval inspection and test of potable
water was recently conducted on the well water supply on Block 2, Lot 10 of
Timber Ridge subdivision. This inspection revealed a nitrate concentration
of 8.72 milligrams per liter (mg/L) was reported for the property's well
water sample. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established
a maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10.0 mg/L for public drinking
water systems. While private wells are not subject to this regulation, EPA
standards are based on existing health information and can therefore be used
to gauge the relative quality of water from private wells. Please see the
attached "Nitrate Fact Sheet" for important information regarding nitrate.
This advisory must be attached to all copies of the subject Certificate of On -
Site Systems Approval.
Nitrate Fact Sheet
From Northern Testing Laboratories, Inc.
Nitrate is a negatively charged compound of nitrogen and oxygen, which is very soluble
in water. Nitrate is not readily filtered or otherwise removed in the soil and can pass
rapidly into ground water wells.
SOURCE: Nitrate is a major component of fertilizer and wastewater. Often the nitrate is
in the form of ammonia or protein first, which through contact with oxygen and certain
bacteria, converts to the oxidized form known as nitrate. Sources of nitrate from
wastewater include urea, ammonia cleaners, food solids, and bacterial cells. It may also
result from the breakdown of organic matter buried in the soil.
TOXICITY: Nitrate is generally not toxic to adults or children over the age of two or
three years, but is associated with a potentially fatal infant disease called
methemoglobinemia. In the digestive system of young children, nitrate converts to
nitrite, which can pass through the intestinal wall into the blood stream. There it
combines with the hemoglobin and interferes with the ability of the blood to carry
oxygen. For this reason, methemoglobinemia is referred to as "blue baby" disease. The
EPA limits the concentration of nitrate in public drinking water supplies to 10 mg/L. The
standard has been lowered from a previous level of 45 mg/L set by the US Public Health
Service and the World Health Organization.
TREATMENT: due to its solubility in water and negative ionic charge, filtration and
other common home water treatment systems such as softening or iron filtration does not
readily remove nitrate. The best method for limiting nitrate in well water is source
control. This can include avoiding overdosing of fertilizer near the well and maintaining
good separation distances between septic tank leach fields and the well. A special anion
exchange filter that contains a media with a strong affinity for negatively charged ions in
water, or by a reverse osmosis treatment system or distillation can remove nitrate.
TESTING: Nitrate analysis is usually done by one of the several "wet chemical"
methods using a spectrophotometer to read the final color endpoint. Specific ion
electrodes also can be used to detect the activity of nitrate in water. This laboratory uses
several different wet chemical methods approved under the public water supply
laboratory certification program. They also have test kits available, which the laboratory
uses to perform an inexpensive "screening test", and with which the homeowner can
monitor the change in nitrate levels from their well. They recommend comparing the test
kit results against a certified analysis from the lab occasionally to verify the accuracy of
the kit. We recommend using a specially prepared bottle that has been rinsed in
hydrochloric acid for collecting samples.
Municipality of Anchorage
44.
Development Services Department
Building Safety Division
On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
4700 Bragaw Street
P.O. Box 196650
Anchorage, AK 99519-6650
www.muni.org/onsite
(907) 343-7904
CERTIFICATE OF ON-SITE SYSTEMs APPROVAL
FOR A SINGLE FmLy DWELLING
Parcell.D. Q-50-1711-78 COSA# r1rM55
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Expiration Date: 3__ (0 - 0 C_
,a*
. .11110:111111:1 Weill 14WAN III a
Current Property owner(s) NFIL & PIENNY NI('HQI S — Dayphone 696-0707
Mailing address 1 9'3q(; TIMRFRLINF DR__ FAM F RIVFR AK q9';77
Lending agency Day phone
Mailing address
Real Estate Agent Day phone
Mailing Address
Unless otherwise requested, COSA will be held by DSD for pickup.
2. NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: -14
3. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY.
Individual Well 9
Individual Water Storage El
Community Class — Well .0
Public Water System El
TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL:
Individual On-sfte 0
Individual Holding Tank
Community On-site
Public Sewer El
The Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department (DSD) issues Certificates of On -Site Systems
Approval (COSA) based only upon the representations given in paragraph 4 by an Independent professional
civil engineer registered in the State of Alaska. Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval are required for the
Iransfer of title (except between spouses) for properties served by a single-family on-site wastewater disposal
and/or water supply system. DSD also Issues COSAs upon request to homeowners. Certificates of On -Site
Systems Approval are valid for 90 days from the date of Issue for properties served by a private or Class C well
and may be reissued with new water sample results. (Certificates may be reissued for a period of up to one
year with valid water samples.) Certificates are valid for one year for properties served by Class A or B wells or
a public water system. The Municipality of Anchorage Is not responsible for errors or omissions in the
professional engineees work.
4. STATEMENT OF INSPECTION BY ENGINEER
As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I verify that my
Investigation, based on procedures outlined in the Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval Guidelines for
this application, shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is (are) safe,
functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. I further verify
that based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation
and inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is(are) in compliance with all
applicable Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time of installation.
7, Pro MIT.Eff ToWN Fil a Velikil a 4: 1121IFEIN .1-1- -*D�53h��
Engineers Printed Name KENNETH M- DIIFFI IR — Date 02/02/06
Engineers Comments: This Investigation was completed in compliance with ADEC and MOA regulations.
The assessment of the condition of the well and septic applies only to the conditions as of the day tested.
The flow and absorption rates may change due to subsurface conditions that may not be observed from
the surface, changes Inland use, local soil characteristics, groundwater levels that may fluctuate during the
year and the water usage of the family being served by the system. The operational life of all well and
septic systems are subject to these various and dynamic characteristics and are outside the control of the
evaluator of the well and septic system. Therefore,
KND can not give any estimate of how long a
� . Or AC
system will function satisfactory for current or future
occupants or can KND guarantee that no unseen
encroachments. deficiencies or discrepancies exist.
5. DSD SIGNATURE
Approved for bedrooms.
Disapproved.
Conditional approval for — bedrooms, with the following stipulations:
Septic System Advisory
Well Flow Advisory
Nitrate Advisory
11 1 �' 1 '�. '.�. J,
Maintenance Agreements
Supplemental Engineer's Report
Other
By: — .,- P. — Original Certificate Date:
(RwAIWL�lrz
Municipality of Anchorage
Development Services Department
Building Safety Division
On -Site Water & Wastewater Program
4700 Bragaw Street
P.O. Box 196650
Anchorage, AK 99519-6650
www.muni.org/onsite
(907) 343-7904
CERTIFICATE OF ON-SITE SYSTEMS APPROVAL CHECKLIST
Legal Description* TIM13ER RIDGF Rl OCK 2- LOT 10 ParcelID: 050-321-28
A. WELL DATA
Well type PRIVAT
Date completed 4/19 8 5
If A, 8, or C provide PWSID #
Sanitary seal (YIN) I
Total depth _3DD—ft. Cased to -10—ft.
FROM WELL LOG
Date of test 4/19RS
Static water level 95 — ft.
Well production 0.75 - 9 -P -m -
WATER SAMPLE RESULTS:
- Well Log (YIN) Y
Wires properly protected (YIN) -Y
Casing height (above ground) 18 n.
AT INSPECTION
9/26/05
39 ft.
1.09 9 -p -m -
Coliform _k_polonies/100ml- Nitrate _5j_L_fiV/L Other bacteria 3 colonies/100 mL
Arsenic: _,rL.Q mg/I Date of sample- 1/26/06 & 2/ILQfL-Collected by- KND Engineering
B. SEPTICIHOLDING TANK DATA
Tank Type/Material Septic/Steel Date installed 919189 Tank size 1000 gal.
Number of Compartments 2 Cleanouts (YIN) X Foundation cleanout (YIN) X Depression over tank (YIN)
High water alarm (YIN) Jbl-Date of pumping 9/26/05 Pumper JIL11
C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA
Date installed 9/9/119 Soil rating (g.p.d./fe or felbdrm) J2, System type Deep Trenc
Length _LLft. Gravel below pipe &-ft. Total depth " ft.
ft. Width
Eff. absorption areaA5fije Monitoring tube Y Depression over field h
Date of adequacy test- 9/28/05 - Results (Pass/Fail) Pass For 3_ bedrooms
Fluid depth in absorption field before test 23.5 In. Water adde4 1000 gal. New depth_4,%S-jn.
Elapsed Time:_= min. Final fluid depth 2,1LI in, Absorption rate >--4,U g.p.d.
Any rejuvenation treatment (past 12 mo.) (YIN & type) _N -If yes, give date -----
D. LIFT STATION
Date installed_Size in gallons Manhole/Access (Y/N)
OPump on* level at_--Jn. 'Pump ofr level at_in. High water alarm level at n.
Datum — Cycles tested— Meets alarm & circuit requirements?
E. SEPARATION DISTANCES
SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM WELL ON LOT TO:
Septic tank/lift station on lot 100'+
Absorption field on lot 10 0'+
Public sewer main 75'+
Sewer /sepfic service line 2S'+
Onadjacentlots 100'+
Onadjacentlots 1QO'+
Public sewer manhole/cleanout 100'+
Holding tank 10 0'+
Animal containment areas 50'+ Manure/animal excrete storage areas 100'+
SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK ON LOT TO:
Building foundation 5'+ Property line 5'+ Absorption field S ' +
Water main 10'+ - Water service fine 10'+ Surfacewater 100'+
Wells on adjacent lots 100'+
SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM ABSORP71ON FIELD ON LOT TO:
Property line 10'+ Building foundation 10'+ Water main 10'+
Water Service line 10'+ Surfacewater 100'+ Driveway. parkingivehicle storage 10'+
Curtain drain 50'+ Wells on adjacent lots 10 0'+
F. COMMENTS
AAROW Pump A Supply Nitrate Remediabons 7 3' & 75' packers w/ 4' PVC sleeve & betonite
-OF 4j"111
0. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
4^ 11.
I cer* that I have determined through field inspections and
review of Municipal records that the above systems are in �7
conformance with MOA COSA guidelines in effect on this
date. . C. �
Engineer's Printed Name KENNETH M. nUFFIIS
69
Date 210210A
C. -E - J�
COSA Fee $430,D0
Date of Payment
Receipt Number
(Rev. 11/05) [V
Waiver Fee $
Date of Payment
Receipt Number
Municipality of Anchorage
Development Services Department
Building Safety Division
On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
4700 Bragaw Street
P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 99519-6650
www.muni.org/onsite
(907) 343-7904
Nitrate Advisory
. Vwf�.
Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval # 060035
During a recent Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval inspection and test
of the potable water supply well on Block 2, Lot 10 of Timber Ridge
subdivision, a nitrate concentration of 5.72 milligrams per liter (mg/L) was
reported for the property's water well sample. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has established a maximum contaminant level
(MCL) of 10.0 mg/L for public drinking water systems. While private well
are not subject to this regulation, EPA standards are based on existing health
information and can therefore be used to gauge the relative quality of water
from private wells. Please see the attached "Nitrate Fact Sheet" for
important information regarding nitrate.
This advisory must be attached to all copies of the subject Certificate of On -
Site Systems Approval.
Nitrate Fact Sheet
From Northcm Testing Laboratories, Inc.
Nitrate is a negatively charged compound of nitrogen and oxygen, which is very soluble
in water. Nitrate is not readily filtered or otherwise removed in the soil and can pass
rapidly into ground water wells.
SOURCE: Nitrate is a major component of fertilizer and wastewater. Often the nitrate is
in the form of ammonia or protein first, which through contact with oxygen and certain
bacteria, converts to the oxidized form known as nitrate. Sources of nitrate from
wastewater include urca, ammonia cleaners, food solids, and bacterial cells. It may also
result from the breakdown of organic matter buried in the soil.
TOXICITY: Nitrate is generally not toxic to adults or children over the age of two or
three years, but is associated with a potentially fatal infant disease called
methemoglobinemia. In the digestive system of young children, nitrate converts to
nitrite, which can pass through the intestinal wall into the blood stream. There it
combines with the hemoglobin and interferes with the ability of the blood to carry
oxygen. For this reason, mcthemoglobinemia is referred to as "blue baby" disease. The
EPA limits the concentration of nitrate in public drinking water supplies to 10 mg/L. The
standard has been lowered from a previous level of 45 mg/L set by the US Public Health
Service and the World Health Organization.
TREATMENT: due to its solubility in water and negative ionic charge, filtration and
other common home water treatment systems such as softening or iron filtration does not
readily remove nitrate. The best method for limiting nitrate in well water is source
control. This can include avoiding overdosing of fertilizer near the well and maintaining
good separation distances between septic tank leach fields and the well. A special anion
exchange filter that contains a media with a strong affinity for negatively charged ions in
water, or by a reverse osmosis treatment system or distillation can remove nitrate.
TESTING: Nitrate analysis is usually done by one of the several "wet chemical"
methods using a spectrophotometer to read the final color cridpoint. Specific ion
electrodes also can be used to detect the activity of nitrate in water. This laboratory uses
several different wet chemical methods approved under the public water supply
laboratory certification program. They also have test kits available, which the laboratory
uses to perform an inexpensive "screening test", and with which the homeowner can
monitor the change in nitrate levels from their well. They recommend comparing the test
kit results against a certified analysis from the lab occasionally to verify the accuracy of
the kit. We recommend using a specially prepared bottle that has been rinsed in
hydrochloric acid for collecting samples.
ASBUILT
�floty 1'�
V �_14nll
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SURVEYED THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:
'e�' z
AND THAT NO ENCROACHM 9TS EXIST EXCEPT AS
INDICATED. IT IS THE RESPONSIGILITY OF THE
OWNER TO DETERMINE THE EXISTENCE OF ANY
EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, OR RESTRICTIONS
WHICH DO NOT APPEAR ON THE RECORDED SUBDI-
VISION PLAT. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD
ANY DATA HEREON BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION
OFFENCE LINES, OR FOR ESTABLISHING BOUND-
ARY LINES.
SEWARD & ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYING 694
SCALE:
OF At%%%
DATEg
TH
...... .....
GRID:
. .... ..... . ... ...
FB: to
LS -6918
, 47
DRAWN: lklkwk
02-01-06;li:46
SGMT&E,0MRONMENTAL SMACES
Drinking Watir Analysis Report . for Total Cbliform Bacqtk�
w0a w4sT*UcrI0m ON FAVOM am w COLLacrAG mAt".. I
MUST 139 C0MKX= BY WATER SUPPLIER
13 muc wATmvys=w#
V �wjl sysm
KNI)
i
L
Treew WNW
C3 R*;P w'' SwPIq
nbvs%d Watw
FAY,
I '71S-7
SAMPLE coLLEcnON:
I
0
al
'0907 561 5301 # 3/
200 yV. POWER D"
ANCHORAGE. ALASK k99618
Tot W7 -M-2343
rox N? -NI -5301
Lab FW No.
1060444
SAOLE TYPE: ' ' :
i
L
Treew WNW
C3 R*;P w'' SwPIq
nbvs%d Watw
j
13 SPK W' Purpo"
SAOLE TYPE: ' ' :
i
L
Treew WNW
C3 R*;P w'' SwPIq
nbvs%d Watw
13 SPK W' Purpo"
YMNPMW * I
t* Ub 11r. copector Ofw-
TO BE COMPLETED BY LABORATORY.
;MRL't RecoMna, -
D2W 1/7 4 11b [3 RU3H SAMPLE
Tw4K A-1444e,Yd� E34sHmwwomr
0"P
Madjot For Pmr4w
"Vary A
Racgved 8 A -rc "' T, A-& k/ Z44 --L
)r
..................... .......................................
........................ .............................
ANC FGK JUN
RE3tK:Ts:
vgwcomww.
IDIbbTUw
An*$t
rA to cunt
ViRMBRANE FVLTER NURL48: PhonD.d C3 FMW
Ok,dC.w,t 'Cd~DOmL DaWTInw�
Spoks vAre
M" FUter VMwm Z,4 6! 1
MMO-MUG (PIA) Val 14—sausfadw
;F—I UnsaftfadOry
a
a
02-02-06;15:41
;907 561 5301 # 2!
I
All Dattirrinnes Are AlafkA
Standard Time
SCS RtEp
1060551001
KND Enirlincering
Mrited'DateMme
02/0212006 14:40
Client Name
11mber Ridge B2 Ll 0
Cvlkcl� I)Atcrrimc
OMI/2006 13:30
Project NAMCIM
Client Sample ID
JImbcrRId&cB2LlO
Itec,tv DaterrInst
02101/2006 14!45
lecin I Director
Stenben C— Ede
Nintrix
Drinking WAtCr
L
PWSID
0
Sample Remarks:
Allowable Pn Analysis
Results POL
unks Whod ComaincrID
Una; Date Data init
Parameter
waters Department
S.72 0.100
m&/L EPA 300.0 A
(<-10) 02/01/06 Mit
Nitnte-N
I
02-02-06;16:56 ;
SGS ReEN
Client Name
FrojeciName/0
Client Sample ID
Matrix
FWSID
sample Remod-4:
A
10604"002
KND Engineering
Timber Ridge: 62 L 10
7 unber FUge B2 LIO
OrInkInA Water
!907 561 5301 # 3,/ ;
Alt Dx��.Imc% are AbL%ka Standard Time
rrl�tcd DateMme 021=006 IS. -04
Collected DAIC/TIMC 01/20006 15:30
Recilvid Daterrime 0112612006 16:04
Tecbnlcal Director Stephen a Ede
Allowable Piep Analysis
Paramcwt RcsWts POL units Method Container 10 Limits Date Date Init
matals by XCP/HS I
Arsenic 5.00 u 5.00 ur/L EP200.9 A 01127/06 02101/06 IK
AAROW PUMP & WER SERACE, LLC
P.O. Box'110496
Anchorage: AK 99511
Office: (907) 346-9355 * Fax (907) 333-8976
Palmer (907) 745-9077 Eagle River. (907) 622-9335
CUSTOMER
7 r
.F-.th'Aj 9 Lk �j &i tr-eLl$
1T0186G3793 P.1
�7203
JOB SITE
ME
I
V!, nl MOT M-
W10 �01
nor-IM11,11 �51
IMEN
NINE
FINE
-FINE
1ENEESIEN
FINE
E
FINE
110 4.3
FINE
0
vip�.
FINE
spa, W01
FINE
E
INNE
BONN ROME
MEN
0
FINE
till
ENI
THIS AMOUNT
Thank You
SiONATURE i i
p Hereby Acknowledge the SallsTactory Completion of the Above Described Work.)
I . I i I
TERMS: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AT 10TH OF MONTH FOLLowtNG PURCHASE.
SERVICE CHARGE AT RATE OF 1.3% PER MONTH WILL BE CHARGED ON OVERDUE ACCOUNTIL
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE AaL
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES luz;;Q
Division of Environmental Services am
On -Site Services Section
P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650
343-4744
. CERTIFICATE OF HEALTH AUTHORITY
APPROVAL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
Parcel I.D.# 05-0 —3" _R'V
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
T
.F.T.Twits
Complete legal description Lot 10; Stock 2; TimbeA Ridge
Location (site address or directions)
19336 TinbvLUne
Eaelte RiveA, AK
Property owner . Jedi wittiEs Day phone 562-2332
Mailing address 19336 TimbeAtine Ea9te Rivet, AK 99577
Lending agency Day phone
Mailing address
Agent Kn;thi 'Q1!n�C;t9r?d1 IZPn,?x nj Fag?p Riyp)t Day phone 694-4�00
Address
Unless otherwise requested, HAA will be held for pickup.
2. NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3
3. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY:
Individual well XXX
Community well
Public water
NOTE: If community well system, provide written confirmation from State ADEC attest-.'-..
Ing to the legality and status of system.
4. TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL:
Individual on-site XXX
Holding tank
Community on-site
Public sewer -
NOTE: If community wastewater system, provide written confirmation from State ADEC
attesting to the legality and status of system.
72-=(R..1/9f) F�l MOAR21
5.
.. I
STATEMENT OF INSPECTION BY ENGINEER.
Ascertified bymysealaffixed heretoandasof the validation date shown below, Iverifythatmy
Investigation of this Health Authority Approval application shows that the on-site water supply
and/or wastewater disposal system Is safe, functional and adequate forthe number of bedrooms
and type of structure Indicated herein. I further verify that based on the information obtained from
the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my Investigation and Inspection, the on-site water
supply and/or wastewater disposal system Is in compliance with all Municipal and State codes,
ordinances, and regulations In effect on the date of this Inspection.
Name of Firm S & S ENGINEERING Phone 6q &f -,'� q -2 47
i/UJ4 Eagle River LOOP KO&d NO. ;I
Address
Engineers signature
Alaska
6.. DHHS SIGNATURE
- X Approved for Z bedrooms.
— Disapproved.
— Conditional approval for
Additional Comments
By:
Date 9 /:1 �y /,1r
OF
_0
� \ ROBERT C. COWAN
CE - 8801
bedrooms, with the following stipulations:
The Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Issues Health Authority
Approval Certificates based only upon the representations given In paragraph 5 above by an Independent
professional engineer registered In theStateof Alaska.The DHHS does this as a courtesy to purchasers of homes
andtheirlending Institutions In orderto satisfy certain federal and state requirements. Employeesof DHHSdonot
conduct Inspections or analyze data before a certificate Is Issued. The Municipality of Anchorage is not
responsible for errors or omissions In the professional engineer's work.
T2.= Mw IM) 11� MOA M
MUNCIPALITY OF ANCW-VA(k
EWIRONMENTAL SUVCES DIVISI
Municipality of Anchorage
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICEsSEP 2 4 1996
OW Environmental Services Division i§
825 L Street, Room 502 * Anchorage, Alaska 99501 * (90*WEWED
Health Authority Approval Checklist
LegalDescription: t—crr 10 13,vL- 7- I-ImGo.�z- Parcel I.D.: 0,5- D 3 2- 1 4 6
A. WELL DATA
welitype If A. B, or C, attach 46EC letter. ADEC water system number
Log present &) --*-
Total depth '3.> z
Sanitary seaI&N) ---q
Date of test
Date completed
Cased to I Casing height (above ground) 12 -
FROM WELL LOG
1,7 b -�;,
Static water level -3 r
4r4
Wail production qs- —VV -M -
WATER SAMPLE RESULTS:
r07- =.
Wires properly protected CON)
AT INSPECTION
&
1,6 g -p -m-
0 Nitrate I - ;1 1 — Other bacteria
IN
Date of sample: ol / I j I q L Collected by: S & S IRMINEERING
17034 Eagle Rhw Loop Road No. 204
13. SEPTIC4HOLDING TANK DATA Eagle ItIver, Alaska "577
Dateinstafied 1-9-kjl Tanksize /000 - Number of Compartments 2- Cleanouwem)-�L—
Foundation deanout(WN) Depression (14& �J High water alarm (Y/N) 1A
Date of Pumpini; 9 -,2 5 Pumper
C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA
Date installed Soil rating (g.pdJft2or ftl/bdrm) IS -11 �4 system type
Length —1Wldth Gravel thickness below pipe —ZoTbted depth Al
Effective absorption area MonitoringTUbe preserittON)-y— Depression over field (Y&V
us' 9-;04G Resull%giisfFall) 62-V For -3
Date of adeq CY test _=L_bedroome
Fluid depth In absorption field before test Qn.); 00 Immediately after_Y 'gal. water added (in.):
.to
Fluid depth (ins) Minutes later:— IS— Absorption rate g.p.d-
Peradde treatment (past 12 months) -�f YC -
72-026 (Rev. W96)-
- -- ---7 - - � - I .,I - I
I
0. LIFT STATION
Date installed
Manhole/Aooess (Y/N)
High water alarm level at -
E. SEPARATION DISTANCES
Size in gallons
"Pump on"level at*
*Datum
SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM WELL ON LOT TO:
at.
14061.1-
Septic/holding tank an lot — On adjacent lots
Absorption field on lot On adjacent lots /Z>0
Public sewer main fit, Public sewer manhole/deanout /J4
Sewer /septic service line _ ;;?,S-- (4- — Lift station 1-ila
SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK ON LOT TO:
Foundation &,—/ — Property line /0 1* Absorption field_ /0
Water main/service line 10 (-t Surface wateddrainage 1,)o 114 Wells on adjacent lots /04
SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM ABSORPTION FIELD ON LOT TO:
Property line /C) I * ;7. 14-
Buildingfoun0a 1 3
,Ion Water mairdservice line
-0 PfA —(Ptcr,&� 44�04,tr ** r4 4a 0i h %q
Surface water 00 14- Driveway, parkingNehicle storage area
Curtain drain Wells on adjacent lots /00 1 4-
F. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
I certify that / have determined thru field hupeams aw mwew of Municipal am
in conformance wiffi MQ4 HAA 9 ' Ofirms ft) effect on Iftis date.
Signature- -?W2 Zzy"w-
Engineers Name R64i A
COMAN
Date -2 'Y /,It. �c e 8801
HAA Fee $ 3'M , 60
Data of Payment '7A#12C
Receipt Number;� �-6p rz�Tzl 2
72-026 (Rev. 3198)'
Waiver Fee $
Date of Payment
Receipt Number
9, 0
OL)
f4
(A
, Ilm U
It (no
I
It
%
It
It
1
1
M 04
M IN,
Cl) 0 L)
1--0
LAJ 0
—i m
rt: ra
C) co
cr- 0.0
0 Lj
En (.)
co V) CL
O(A C3
MW
� z
< Z
< z
0 3-, z fa
z
<0 .3
zn 1 '0, "0, ow. t
z Ozt= -j +
L) it.
> �Izm 0 �.i .
0 wv)w� z WIL co I 2mg:i
0 z
4v)=)
M WFWL)�Vz
V) z
-w<<o
V)
wzsgr 0 --------------
Womww� ff)
IAJ
z -- ---------
. tno wz�
mo - ------
�- = Z 0 o ---------------
(n (n < LLI ---
cr
2i
Lij
0
<
vj� tu
!=u
IlVi3Cl/NV-ld 311S