HomeMy WebLinkAboutDENALY S-103885-10388
Denaly
Platting Board
Summary of Action
January4, 2006
Page 6
within lot boundaries and under private
ownership, and the need for any related plat
notes.
23. Providing a temporary turnaround at the
terminus of the unnamed east -west road within
Phase 3 of the development.
24 S itting information for each additional
liol-
within is proposed subdivision to th-site
Water an stewater Program satisfy the
requirements sp 'fled by 21.15, AMC
W a ( ��-� 15.55 and AMC 15. st be submitted. The
P �` C ��lots in question , 1 t 8, 38, 39, 40 (and
a I J �J tracts B 1, 3 , S, and 8 if the tracts are not
n P design as open space). This ormation
(� L include, but may not necessarily be 'ted
T�� 5� Soils testing, percolation testing, and
R�a� � � ground water monitoring must be
,p. conducted to confirm the suitability for
f / development using on-site wastewater
disposal systems. Ground water
monitoring must be conducted during
high ground water season in either the fall
(October) or spring (May).
G �<
b. Areas designated for the original and
replacement wastewater disposal system
d1.. s ��
''
sites must be identified and must meet all
criteria specified in AMC 15.65 including
Op L, O /
�O
slope and slope setback requirements.
I ()
C. Topographical information must be
�)
submitted.
d. An aquifer test shall be conducted within
the proposed additional lots. This aquifer
test shall include one pumping well and a
minimum of two observation wells. The
aquifer test shall show that there is an
adequate water supply to .support the
proposed subdivision and the effects of the
Platting Board
Summary of Action
January 4, 2006
Page 7
oK pts o
ONS -/I `
9*4f
e.
�v0LF,
ore P I+SF �
FOK w
Tµi P)4�s �
appropriation of water to serve this
subdivision on surrounding properties.
The aquifer test shall be accomplished
according to procedures outlined by this
department.
a
The Petitioner is required to resolve with
the n;Site Water and Wastewater
Program eed to show the well and
100 foot setba radius on pr ed Lot
38. If the well wi e r ed for future
use it must b umented by an
engineer. R e area wl 'n lot lines in
accord a with AMC 15.6 hall be
sh on Lot 38 for potential was ter
fsposal systems.
f 1N 25. Making the following drafting changes:
a. Street Names: Tikhatna/McIntyre is too
close to Takota. Must use a different
name. Bendilent Drive is currently named
Mc Intyre Drive. Either this has to remain
.Mc Intyre Drive or the circle at the north
end must be given a unique name. (There
can not be two Bendilent Circles).
"Tikhatna/McIntyre Drive" is not labeled.
b. Title Block Information: Denaly is spelled
incorrectly.
C. Map Information: Unity Park Subdivision
is not labeled. Tract C-1 needs a Denaly
Subdivision label.
d. Including the average slope of each lot on
the plat to assist in land use permit
reviews.
e. Amending sheet 1 of 3 to show the
alignment of Tikhatna/McIntyre Drive
which is shown on sheet 2 of 3.
26. Resolving utility easements.
Municipality of Anchorage
Development Services Department `
/ Building Safety Division
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 14, 2005
TO: Jerry Weaver, Jr., Platting Officer, CPD
FRONT: eDaniel Roth, Program Manager, On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
SUBJECT: Comments on Cases due December 16, 2005
The On -Site Water & Wastewater Program has reviewed the following cases and has
these comments:
S10388-4 Denaly Subdivision
Information to satisfy the requirements specified by AMC 21.15, AMC
15.55 and AMC 15.65 must be submitted for each additional lot within
this proposed subdivision. The lots in question are; I thru 8, 38, 39, 40,
Tracts B 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8. This information must include, but may not
necessarily be limited to:
1. Soils testing, percolation testing, and ground water monitoring must be
conducted to confirm the suitability for development using on-site
wastewater disposal systems. Ground water monitoring must be
conducted during high ground water season in either the fall (October) or
spring (May).
2. Areas designated for the original and replacement wastewater disposal
system sites must be identified and must meet all criteria specified in
AMC 15.65 including slope and slope setback requirements.
-----3. Topographical information must be submitted. __.— _. — —� — �—
4. An aquifer test shall be conducted within the proposed additional lots.
This aquifer test shall include one pumping well and a minimum of two
observation wells. The aquifer test shall show that there is an adequate
water supply to support the proposed subdivision and the effects of the
appropriation of water to serve this subdivision on surrounding properties.
The aquifer test shall be accomplished according to procedures outlined by
this department.
5. The On -Site Water & Wastewater Program records do not contain
documents for the water well system(s) on the proposed lot 38. An
engineer shall properly document these systems prior to final approval of
the plat.
AC
4C
4C
Zoe
Mayor Mark Begich
Municipality of Anchorage
P.O. Box 196650 • Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 *Telephone: (907) 343-7900
Physical Address: 4700 Bragaw Street * Anchorage, Alaska 99507 • www.muni.org/planning
Planning Department
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON PRE_k,l 1,INJ BDIVISIONS
December 08, 2005
The Municipality of Anchorage has received application relating to the following preliminary plat
activitv. _The hearin , slednesday, January 04, 2006 and comments must reach our office
_
by ,' 4M" 005 in order to be included in the staff conditions of approval.
Preliminary Plats to be heard:
PREVIOUSLY ROUTED
810388-4
New subdivision: Denaly Subdivision REVISED
Orin. subd/Legai: McIntyre Subdivision
Request: A variance from AMC 21.80.240 (Cul-de-sac length) and AMC 21.80.330 (Design
standards -Lot frontage and access).
S11082-2
New subdivision: Bear Ridge Subdivision
Orig. SubdIA9al: T1 3N R1 E SEC 4, Teri #2, Tract A (with variance)
Request: A time extension request for Subdivision Agreement case 03-025.
511230-2
New subdivision: Lilleston Subdivision
Orig. subd/Legal: TI 2N R3W Section 15, BLM Lots 41,42,46,47,48,49E,50,52,56,45A
Request: 1 st 18 month time extension
S11256-2
New Subdivision: Bernard
Orig. subd/L.egal: Bernard
Request: 1st 18 month time extension
311438 -1
Now subdivision: Simonson Tracts Subdivision
Orig. SubdfLepal: Simonson Homestead
Request: To subdivide one parcel into two tracts of land with vacation of the Right-of-way
easement (Pete's Place) running north -south along the west property line; and
vacation of a 10' Trail easement, a 10' Drainage easement and a 10' Utility
easement running north -south along the west property line.
S11439-1
New subdivision: Hillcrest Plaza
Orig. subd/Legai: Hillcrest and Hillcrest Park #1
Request:
DOUBLE SIDED * INDICATES CASES
1 OF 2 PAGES PREVIOUSLY ROUTED
311439-1
3W New subdivision: Hillcrest Plaza
Orig. subd/Legai: Hillcrest and Hillcrest Park #1
Request: To subdivide 8 lots and 3 tracts of land into 4 tracts of land with vacations of a
portion of a 20 ft alleyway running north -south adjoining Lots 1-6, Block 5, and a
portion of a 20 ft T&E easement running east -west between Short Street and Old
Seward Highway; and vacations of a 35 ft utility easement, a 25 It screening
easement, a 20 ft drainage easement and 10 ft by 30 It anchor easement within the
proposed Contrary Court right-of-way dedication.
S11440-1
New Subdivision: Cross Estates Subdivision
Orig. 3ubd/Legal: Heritage Hills #1
Request: To subdivide 2 tracts of land into 61 lots with vacation of an approximate 60 ft x
1,410 It Right-of-way easement (Our Road) running north -south between Talus Drive
and Huffman Road
Attached are copies of the proposed plats. Please submit your comments in writing,
specifying any easements or other requirements that your department or agency may
need.
If no easements are required at this time, please provide a list of those plats to which
there is "no comment' or "no objection".
Sincerely,
Jerry T. Weaver, Jr
Platting Officer
Enclosures
December 6, 2005
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Community Planning and Development
4700 S.Bragaw Street
Anchorage AK, 99517
Attn: Doug Lesh
.�i
S' 103 8 8 JAN 0 4 2006
Regarding: Denaly Subdivision S-10388-384 *-
-�T►
Dear Doug,
Per your request dated November 18, 2005, we are providing the following additional
information for the above referenced case.
This response is part of request for a 2nd time extension for Denaly subdivision. The request is
for a 60 -month time extension to construct both phases. As part of the application a variance
has been requested for lots not adjacent to a public right-of-way. Also requested is a variance
for a cul-de-sac length longer than the 900 feet allowed in a rural district. This is a phased
development that will eventually provide through access and eliminate the cul-de-sac
altogether. In addition, the cul-de-sac length is currently 915 feet, only 15 feet longer than
allowed. Based on this information we request approval on the cul-de-sac variance.
1. Slope Calculations
PHASE 2
Block 1
Lot 26
9%
Lot 27
12%
Lot 28
10%
Lot 29
14%
Lot 30
13%
Lot 31
13%
Lot 32
8%
Lot 33
7%
Lot 34
7%
Lot 35
8%
Lot 36
8%
Lot 37
8%
Lot 41
11%
Lot 42
11%
Lot 43
13%
Lot 44
12%
Lot 45
14%
�. .. n , ,
�S0�P1 & �c F-7 77
530D A Street Aaftille, Alaska 99518 T 907-272-5451 F;,007 212-91165
S4 4[ 3181E Palmer tNaillla NigWil Seita 2 Wasifia Alaska 99654 4-'9117-351 F 9013519140 ' f
/4\ Yc-� - ....1.�-..-�.+......3. ...�-...�..n ulcer r..a�. 4✓. ... W... ..1.. ...�• a .... �•W �.��F.:
1 Y.
Denaly Sub. Page 2
Lot 46
16%
Lot 47
17%
Lot 48
18%
Lot 49
21%
Lot 50
20%
Lot 51
19%
Lot 52 21%
Lot 53 19%
PHASE 3
Tract 3
6%
Tract 4
10%
Tract 5
15%
Tract 8
11%
Block 1
Lot 38
8%
Lot 39
11%
Lot 40
13%
Block 2
Lot 1
9%
Lot 2
15%
Lot
11%
Lot 4
20%
Lot 5
21%
Lot 6
16%
Lot 7
18%
Lot 8
20%
2. The topography is now shown on the preliminary plat drawings.
3. The stream maintenance and protection easement is now shown on the plat.
4. Eagle River and the general flood zone is shown on the preliminary plat drawing as the
subdivision is not located within the flood zone the flood zone contour is not shown on
the plat.
5. The wetlands boundary shown on the original preliminary plat was not based on field
survey data. The new preliminary plat drawing identifies all existing wetland boundaries
lounsbury & associates, inc.
Denaly Sub. Page 3
within the subdivision. Verification of the wetland boundaries may be requested by the
Municipal Wetlands coordinator.
6. The lot configuration of Phase 2 has increased the density of the development. While
the DUA of Phase 2 is over the .75 DUA required by AO 99-12, when the overall DUA
Is computed for the Phases 2 and 3 the DUA is .55 and well below the DUA
requirement.
7. No greenbelts are required by code and the new preliminary plat will not dedicated any
greenbelts for common use.
8. The creek originally shown on lots 39 and 40 was been rerouted and not longer
impacts the subject lots. As with the wetlands boundaries, verification creek may be
requested by the Municipal Wetlands coordinator.
9. The new plat note No. 3 only identifies that the easement exists. With the development
of Phase 3 new right-of-way will be dedicated to provide legal access.
10. The new preliminary drawing contains detail and dimension detail for Phase 3.
11. We are assuming that on approval of the original preliminary plat that Tract 5 was
proposed as greenbelt area and therefore was conditioned to be dedicated to the
homeowners as part of the plat approval. However, as there is no code requirement for
greenbelts in this district the use as residential lots is allowed. The topography in the
area is steep and some grading will be required to construct the driveways to municipal
standards. The petitioner will work with MOA traffic and PM&E to resolve the driveway
issue prior to recording the final plat. If it is determined that the steep terrain will not
allow for 3 lots, a lot may be eliminated to allow for an adequate driveway.
12. The alignments of Tikhatna Circle and Tikhatna Drive have changed and new design
drawings have been submitted to MOA Traffic and PM&E. This entire issue will be
resolved as a condition of the final plat.
13. The intersection of Bendilent Drive and Tikhatna have changed and new design
drawings have been submitted to MOA Traffic and PM&E. This entire issue will be
resolved as a condition of the final plat.
As always, please feel free to contact me with any further questions.
Sincerely,
Lounsbury and Associates
Bradford J. Rinckey P.L.S.
lounsbury & associates, inc.
�j �'.� �! ♦> `.y' c/�*rvT . ;� �'- ice';i _ .', ,.
•,. •: ,, � MunhapaldyofAndltxage
Application {or Subdroision Variance.- PlanningD1%65ent r
} , } �",PO Box 196650 ' <
Anchorage AK 99519.6650,
l
_ � 1® s _�. 19L, _ ._'� lA .� � ._ , �..�...� _M1�af �..I, •rte
Please fill in the information asked for below.
T Y 03 9 8 oFC o 7 2t)Ft3
' ', d. ♦y - a_ S'\'.. 1 :c .. '.Y rA�,
.i' f..-.4, �:r :. .�'''.:/�.� .D 0.:-. i�.,1 �Y y�
PETITIONER'
PETITIONER REPRESENTATIVE (IFaN1�
timet name usq
Eklutna Incorporated
Nam last name t)
Lounsbury and Associates
ling dress
Centerfield Drive, Suite 200
ill dress
530�'A' Street Anchorage, AK
Contact Phone: Day: 696-2828 Night
Contact Phone: Day: P72-5451 Night
FAX:
FAX: 272-9065
E -mal:
E-mail: b.rinckey@iounsburyinc.com
'Report additional petitioners or disclose other toowners on supplemental form. Failure to divulge other tleroelaail interest owners may delay processing of this appircabon.
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Tax #(ooD-0oo'040ott): 067-062-06-000-06
Site Street Address: Denaina Drive
Current legal description: (use additional sheet a necessary)
Tract Al Denaly Subdivision
I hereby certify that (I am)([ have been authorized to ad for) owner of the property described above and that I am petitioning for an subdivision
variance in conformance with Title 21 of the Anchorage Municipal, Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the application fee is
nonrefundable and is to cover the costs associated with processing this application, and that it does not assure approval of the variance. I
understand that the burden of evidence to show compliance with the subdivision variance standards rests with me, the applicant
OS
Date
(Agents anis( provide written prod of authortration)
COMMENTARY
The variance is for relief from the requirement to:
Cul-de-sac lengths shorther than qOD Ft.
The existing situation is:
This is a phased development and future phases will create through traffic.
Granting the variance will allow:
The construction of the next phase with a cul-de-sac longer than800 Ft. Including a temporary turnaround.
CODE CITATIONS
AMC 21. 80.240
AMC 21.
Accepted by':_ t �.y r . < f.I Poster 3 ARdavtt S '. „� I Fee ! I Case Number,
Page 2
VARIANCE STANDARDS
The Platting Board may only grant a variance if the Board finds that all of the following 4 standards are satisfied. Each
standard must have a response in as much detail as it takes lo explain how your property's condition satisfies the
standard. The burden of proof rests with you. Use additional paper if needed.
There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of
the subdivision requiations would clearly be impractical, unreasonable or undesirable to the general public.
This Is part of a previously approved, phased development. While it Is true that development of this phase will create a
non -conforming cul-de-sac length, the next phase will connect to existing ROW and therefore conform to Municipal
code.
The granting of the specific variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area/
in which such DroDertv is situated.
EXPLAIN:
In no way will the granting of this simple dimensional variance have an Impact on public welfare, property, or safety. A
temporary tumaround will be created, providing safe tumaround space for general traffic as well as emergency
vehicles. Eagle River Road has similar road configurations along Its entire 10 mile length. In the past, this type of
configuration has not created problems.
Such variance will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of the subdivision regulations or the
comprehensive plan of the municipality.
EXPLAIN:
The effect of granting the variance will not have a nullifying effect. This will be a temporary situation and will come Into
conformance with the development of the next phase.
Undue hardship would result from strict compliance with specific provisions or requirements of the subdivision
regulations.
EXPLAIN:
Undue hardship will result if the variance is not granted, In that the subdivision has no other development configuration
options. Slope, location of existing ROW and proximity to park land make this the only viable development
configuration. Additionally, this type of variance has been allowed In the development of hundreds of subdivisions
within the Municipality.
SV (Rev. 01102)*Back
Application for';Subd
r
ISM.,Variance
Please fill in the information asked for below.
r •- y �
N Mumapaldy of Anchorage : 4 .
Planning DePirtrirent t
�' PO Boit ;196650 ' 3 :t
r t >IAnchorege AK 99519.6650
i TY
-rteport aaartronal peuhaners or alscose over co-owners on suiWememal roan. ranure to or ruge omen Deneuc al interest owners may oehay processing at mis appucaoon.
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Tax #(ow400 oo-000): 067-062-06-000-06
Site Street Address: Denaina Drive
Current legal description: (ase additional sheet a necessary)
Tract At Denaly Subdivision
1 hereby certify that (I amyl have been authorized to ad for) Amer of the property described above and that I am petitioning for an subdivision
variance in conformance with Title 21 of the Anchorage Municipal, Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the application fee is
nonrefundable and is to ewer the costs associated with processing this application, and that it does not assure approval of the variance. 1
understand that the burden of evidence to show compliance with the subdivision variance standards rests with me, the applicant
Date Signature (Agents must proMe written proof of awwrtatia,)
n.Y 1 L• d it. l ' }. �'..1 h. •.i it �....
COMMENTARY
The variance is for relief from the requirement to:
All lots must abut a public ROW.
The existing situation is:
Two proposed lots do not abut public ROW.
Granting the variance will allow:
Creation of two lots that would receive access from a public use easement instead of public ROW.
i <� : i:: _ l ': A:� l.. l:. '-.t 5-•�i.�� t:y � r 1 f ' '. v ,.�iSa.';; �' _
CODE CITATIONS
AMC 21. 80.330
AMC 21.
Accepted by _
Poster 6 Affldauit " ' ; - r< w.`
PETITIONER*
PETITIONER REPRESENTATIVE (IF Arm
N3ne last name t)
Eklutna Incorporated
arse last name first)
Lounsbury and Associates
Mailing kdress
Centerfield Drive, Suite 200
ili ares
530 "A' Street Anchorage, AK
,
Contact Phone: Day: 6966-2828 Night
Contact Phone: Day. 272.5451 Night
FAX:
FAX: 272-9065
E -mad:
E -mad: b.rinckey@lounsburyinc.com
-rteport aaartronal peuhaners or alscose over co-owners on suiWememal roan. ranure to or ruge omen Deneuc al interest owners may oehay processing at mis appucaoon.
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Tax #(ow400 oo-000): 067-062-06-000-06
Site Street Address: Denaina Drive
Current legal description: (ase additional sheet a necessary)
Tract At Denaly Subdivision
1 hereby certify that (I amyl have been authorized to ad for) Amer of the property described above and that I am petitioning for an subdivision
variance in conformance with Title 21 of the Anchorage Municipal, Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the application fee is
nonrefundable and is to ewer the costs associated with processing this application, and that it does not assure approval of the variance. 1
understand that the burden of evidence to show compliance with the subdivision variance standards rests with me, the applicant
Date Signature (Agents must proMe written proof of awwrtatia,)
n.Y 1 L• d it. l ' }. �'..1 h. •.i it �....
COMMENTARY
The variance is for relief from the requirement to:
All lots must abut a public ROW.
The existing situation is:
Two proposed lots do not abut public ROW.
Granting the variance will allow:
Creation of two lots that would receive access from a public use easement instead of public ROW.
i <� : i:: _ l ': A:� l.. l:. '-.t 5-•�i.�� t:y � r 1 f ' '. v ,.�iSa.';; �' _
CODE CITATIONS
AMC 21. 80.330
AMC 21.
Accepted by _
Poster 6 Affldauit " ' ; - r< w.`
Fee +
?
Case Number �� w ' 1 1 '•
,
Page 2
Appkztw for Sub&&ion Vadance confined
VARIANCE STANDARDS
The Platting Board may only grant a variance if the Board finds that all of the following 4 standards are satisfied. Each
standard must have a response in as much detail as it takes io explain how your property's condition satisfies the
standard. The burden of proof rests with you. Use additional paper if needed.
There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of
the subdivision regulations would clearly be impractical, unreasonable or undesirable to the general public.
EXPLAIN:
The area in question Is a notch In a larger portion of land limiting ROW design to serve the lots. The entire area is
located In steep terrain which further limits ROW design. The lots are bound to the north by an Irregular shaped
boundary which does not allow frontage on the public ROW.
The granting of the specific variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area
in which such property is situated.
EXPLAIN:
In no way will the granting of this variance have an impact on public welfare, property, or safety. The lots will still have
physical and legal access through a public use easement created with this plat.
Such variance will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of the subdivision regulations or the
comprehensive plan of the municipality.
EXPLAIN:
The effect of granting the variance will not have a nullifying Intent because the lots will still have physical and legal
access through a public use easement created with this plat. Additionally, the public use easement will only serve two
single family lots so dedicated public ROW Is not required to handle this very small amount of traffic. The public use
easement is essentially a driveway.
Undue hardship would result from strict compliance with specific provisions or requirements of the subdivision
regulations.
EXPLAIN:
Undue hardship would result If the variance is not granted, In that the subdivision has no other design options. Limiting
design features such as the irregularly shaped north boundary of the parcel and the steep terrain make the proposed
design the best solution for this area. The land would essentially be unusable without this variance. Additionally, this Is
a situation that Is granted frequently In similar areas like this In Eagle River and on the Hillside In Anchorage.
8V (Rev. 01/02)*Back
Roth, Dan J.
From: Lesh, Douglas A.
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:36 PM
To: Roth, Dan J.
Subject: Denaly Subdivision - Case S-10388-3
Dan,
With regard to Denaly Subdivision and the request for a second 18 month time extension, I am sure you have noticed that
this new plat is quite different from the plat that was originally approved back in 1999. As it is a second time extension
we need to come up with a whole new list of conditions of approval. While it is fine to recommend the same thing as was
recommended in 1999, there are a few issues that may be of particular interest to you which you might want to address.
1) What was originally Tract 2 (within Phase 3 of the original preliminary plat) has been replaced with
lots 39 and 40 on the new plat. These lots were highly impacted by the creek setback which was
shown on the plat as originally approved (and interestingly enough is no longer shown). It is my
understanding that Steve Ellis with Watershed Management thinks the creek still is there. Therefore
he will likely require that they delineate the creek setback on the plat. This leaves the issue of
whether or not these lots can accommodate a well and septic system. Would you like a condition
placed on the plat that requires them to prove that these lots can accommodate a well and septic? If
so if you could provide a condition for inclusion that would be great. Or possibly the standard
conditions cover this?
2) On the original preliminary plat as approved, there was a well located on Lots 47 and 48. This well
is no longer shown. I don't know if it is there or not, however if you would like a condition or to
show the location of the well or provide evidence that it has been decommissioned if you could
provide a condition to that effect it would be appreciated.
The original Summary of Action with the conditions of approval has been attached for your review. If you have any
questions, or need a copy of the plat as was originally approved by the Platting Board back in 1999 I can bring that over
to you.
Thanks,
Doug
aj
200512081218526
2.pdf (930 KB)...
Platting Board
Summary of Action
March 3, 1999
Page 7
10) Obtaining a determination of side and rear yards for
Lot 33 from Land Use Enforcement and resolving the
need to redesign the lot to meet AMC 21.80.300.1) or
to obtain a variance from the Platting Board.
11) Resolving the need for a wetlands permit prior to any
disturbance within the 100' creek setback with the
Army Corps of Engineers. — 6-W
12) Resolving the need to reconfigure Lot 55 to exclude the
area within the 100' stream setback and/or the need
for a plat note prohibiting any disturbance within the
stream setback with DCP&D.
13) Obtaining approval of all location(s) to access Eagle
River Road that meet sight distance standards from
ADOT.
14) Resolving the need to provide a second access from the
subdivision to Eagle River Road from prior to
submitting a final plat for Phase II and III.
15) Resolving the need to vacate the private access
easement extending east from the west property
boundary with DCP&D.
16) Obtaining approval from Traffic Engineering to ensure
that roads are constructed to provide adequate sight
distance at intersections or at vertical curves and that
roads do not exceed Municipal standards for grades.
17) Providing trail connections linking this property to
Eagle River Road and walkways to the Eagle River
Greenbelt, location and width to be resolved with
Parks and Beautification and Transportation Planning.
Submitting information to Department of Health and
Human Services to satisfy the requirements specified
by AMC 21.15 and AMC 15.65 that includes, but may
not necessarily be limited, to the following:
• Platting Board
Summary of Action
March 3, 1999
Page 8
(a) Soils testing, percolation testing and ground
water monitoring must be conducted to confirm
the suitability for development using an on-site
wastewater disposal system. Ground Water
monitoring must be conducted during high
water season in either the fall (October) or spring
(April -May).
(b) Areas designated for the original and
replacement wastewater disposal system sites
must be identified and must meet all criteria
specified in AMC 15.65, including slope and
slope setback requirements.
(c) Topographical information must be submitted.
4 (d) Supporting documentation on water availability
must be provided.
19) Showing the following on the plat:
(a) The 100' stream protection setback required by
AMC 21.40.115.F.3;
(b) the surveyed boundaries of the Type A and Type
B wetlands on the plat;
(c) The 100 -year floodplain boundary on the plat;
(d) the detail for the intersection of Hideaway Court
extended and McIntyre Road and indicate the
transition from the 50 -foot to the 60 -foot wide
right-of-way, and
>•
(e) Any conditions required by the Corps of
Engineers, if a wetlands permit is required.
20) Placing the following notes on the plat:
(a) "Portions of this subdivision are situated within
the flood hazard district as it exists on the date
hereof. The boundaries of the flood hazard
-\ Municipality of Anchorage
• "` Development Services Department
Building Safety Division"
s. ,.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 23, 2005
TO: Jerry Weaver, Jr., Platting Officer, CPD
FRO1l: Obaniel Roth, Program Manager, On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
SUBJECT: Comments on Cases due October 14, 2005
The On -Site Water R. Wastewater Program has reviewed the following cases and has
these comments:
t:_,S 10388 =-3---Denaly SiMNiiion -'18 month time extension request"
No objection to time extension, all other past comments still apply
S11058-2 Bruin Park First Addition Subdivision
No objection, public water R sewer shall be extended and serve all
proposed lots
S11415-1 Girdwood Elementary School
No objection
S11418-1 Forest Heights Subdivision
No objection, public water R sewer shall be extended and serve proposed
Tract A R B
S11419-1 Lampert Subdivision #5
No objection
S11420-1 Raspberry Center
No objection
NEW PLAT APPLICATION FRAME 1
APPRAISAL INFORMATION The current par.
Owner
PARCEL ID 067-041.09-000 cel Is
Legal Desc R Description
Zone
deactivated or
Grid Invalid.
SOFT
ADD NEW
CASE OR ACTION Sale Pending ❑
Entered By PreCV Enter Date Odg. Application Date
Case Number
S10388-- Action ID
Subdivision
1
Denaly Subdivision -18 month time extension
torrent McIntyre Subdivision, A and unsubdivided
Legal '114
Original Subd
[McIntyre Subdivision *(NOT ROUTED)'
N 11
land located within the N 112 of the SW less the
NE 114 of the NE 114 of the NE 114 & SW 114 of the
Site Add
SE 114 (North Portion) and SW 114 of the NW 114 of
Planning
g
No property address available
p... Qe VA w W, ••a dl 1 w w hl. Qn 1.. 11
Location
Exsisting Lots
[2] Proposed Lob l
Southwest of Eagle River Road and north of the
t6
Eagle River Greenbelt.
Requestr
ubdivide 1 tract and an unsubdivided portion of land Into 63
and 6 tracts.
_
Remarks RECORDED:2000-012102.24-00(PHASE1)TIME
EXTENSION -EXPIRES: 09-02-05
COMMUNITY COUNCILS 0'01
Eagle River Valley
T
P
Community Council as r
y
shown In CAMA data d
P
e
e
r
Type: P - Primary CC S • Secondary CC
PETITIONER
Last Name
Eklutna Inc. b Jack White Development Address
3201 'C"Street
First Name
Day Phone
Night Phone C'
1( J
c . J
E-mail
`[,
City
choroge
Fax#
I`) State
[AK I Zip [99503
REPRESENTATIVE (SURVEYOR)
Surveyor
Bus. Name F. Robert Betl b Associates Address
801 Fireweed Lane
Last Name Bell
First Name Boh
[
Day Phone (90T) 2745257 Night Phone O City
[Anchorage
E-mail Cfrb@alaska.net I State
AK Zip 995031801
Fart [(907) 272-7531]
DOCUMENTS E A E E A E
A
E E
W
D E D D E D D
E D
Long Plat Copies (42)0 ❑ Aerial Photo 0 0
Site Plan 0 A
Short Plat Copies (32)0 ❑ Housing Stock Map 0
Authorization V
Reduced Copy (8.5 x 11) Zoning Map a
Survey Waiver
Affidavit Fee
Drainage Plan ❑ ❑11
As Built Pedestrian Walkways 0
Topo Map (4 copies) 0 0 0
Certficate to Plat[] Landscape Req 0
Soils Report (4 copies) 0 0 0
Waiver Remarks
I
NFW PI AT APPI lnATIniJ FRAME 9
CASE INFORMATION
S10388
Case NumberAction ID
Parcel ID 067-041-09-000
2
Owner
REMARKS & COMMENTS
Remarks
SOA mailed 03-0&04
RECORDED: 2000-012102.24-00(PHASE 1)
ASSOCIATED PARCELS
Parcel
Parcel ID Acres Owner Count. Zone
Legal
06704109000 98.06
06706206000 64.63 EKLUTNAINC
1
H R10SL—�
Additional Owners
Total Acres 162.69 CAMA Site Address
Grid
HEARING DATE
Action Subdivision approval time extension
Number ID
Case 510368 Actionr2]
Authority Platting Board
Type g [Consent Agenda
I Hearing 0110312004
Date
Click to Set Action (Hearing) Date—>>
With this hearing date it will have taken 63 days to process this case.
03103/2004 No
CASE SCHEDULE If no date, field does not apply to Authority Type
Hearing Date 03/03/2004
Public Hearing Notices 02/112004
Last Day Appear 02/06/2004
Cut -Off Date 01/132004
Legal In Newspaper 02/092004
Route Cases 01202004
Affadavit Due 02/182004
Assign Cases 01212004
Staff Packet I Reports Due 02/232004
Joint Case Review 02/032004
Packet to Print 02/212004
Agency Comments 02/132004
Deliver Packet 02/272004
Legal Ad to PIO 02/042004
Post App Meeting 01/142004
PLAT FEES
Fee Code
Proposed Lots 69
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
. �--CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS �,
August 4, 2005
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
Division of Environmental Services
On -Site Services Section
P.O. Box 196650
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650
Ref: Exploratory Wells for Proposed Denaly Subdivision Phase 2,
We request a well permits to have three exploratory wells on the proposed lots 32, 45, and 46 of
Tract A-1, Denaly Subdivision for the purpose of subdivision. Attached is a site plan for the
proposed well locations. Atter completion of the wells, a draw down test will be performed on
these three wells for the purpose of subdividing the properties.
If you have Ai y questions, please contact us at 337-6179. Thank you for your assistance.
P.E., M.S.
3701 E. Tudor Road, Suite 101 *Anchorage, AK 99507
Ph: (907) 337-6179 * Fax: (907) 338-3246 * Website: gamessengineering.com
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS S GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3MI c n •vo. w 101 • AIC -OWL m w ? • n ' W)"77 i» • rw (w) e " • �v.•...«ghwgw..
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE 12, PROPOSED LOT 26
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/10/2002
DEPTOR;
(feeTEST HOLE 26
1ORGANICS
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SOIL QLAS TlI•
CLOCK
TIME
GW I
•�
•' IIIIIIIII
6/10/2002 1
II�III!IIGM%//a.CL
-
/.%GCNNN
•
'SWIIIIIIIII
1:09
� iiia.
3 1/4*
•
SC
—
SP TO SM
w/ GM LENSES
THROUGHOUT
DEPTH TO DATE
GROUNDWATER
12' 6/10/2002
11'-2' 6/19/2002
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/10/2002 1
12:59
-
6'
—
2
1:09
10
3 1/4*
4'3
2 3/4-
3
1:09
—
6'
—
4
1:19
10
3 1/2-
2 1/2'
5
1:19
—
6'
—
6
1:29
10
3 3/4-
2 1/4"
7
1:29
—
6'
—
8
1:39
10
3 7/8-
2 1/8-
8'9
9
1:39
—
6'
—
10
1:49
10
378'
21 8'
11
1:49
—
6'
—
12
1:59
10
3 7/8" 1
2 1 8'
19� PERCOLATION RATE 4.7 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: E YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. 1, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: O -
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP,
Ltd.ooc,'`:
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS O a
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:DENALY SUSDMSION• PHASE f2, PROPOSED LOT 27
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 6/10/2002
DEPT ORGANICS
(feet) ---- TEST HOLE 27
GM/ML
E
7
FT
12 6'—
13-
14-
15-
16-
17-
18-4
o 14 151617 18
DATE
16'
SP TO SM
15'
6/19/2002
W/LENSES M
1'11111
IIIIIIIII
��aaaaa,
THROUGHOUT
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
NNIIIII
•
��aaae■a
I%I/I/II% I
12 6'—
13-
14-
15-
16-
17-
18-4
o 14 151617 18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
16'
6/10/2002
15'
6/19/2002
IIIIIIIII
��aaaaa,
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
NNIIIII
•
��aaae■a
I%I/I/II% I
���,
IuIIIJI
q.6.�
•
4*44
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
16'
6/10/2002
15'
6/19/2002
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
19 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS P RFORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: B : 0
aaaaa
��aaaaa,
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
��aaae■a
19 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS P RFORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: B : 0
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
IJVIL LVV - rCR%.VLAI1Vl`1 ILJ11
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE k2. PROPOSED LOT 28
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 6/10/2002
((ee1
DEPTH
ORGANICS
�I H I I I I II TEST HOLE #2781
wmllillllll®
3
5
-...
9.
6/10/2002
...,...
.; ..,.
6/19/2002
•:.0.00
SP W/
111111111
•9.
111141
6
.. ;.. ••
SM LENSES
rA
.;;; ;:
THROUGHOUT &
7
:;_'; ;
SOME GRAVEL
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
9.
6/10/2002
9'-10'
6/19/2002
�t•aaaa�
111111111
111141
��aaaaa
%//%
rA
NNE
•
r,�aaaaa
111111111
r,�aaaaa'
����.
11
ky`
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
9.
6/10/2002
9'-10'
6/19/2002
�t•aaaa�
A, : v d rys�0�1
..w . .............
'{ a A, orness:
CE— 3
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
�I�—f'I TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES 0 NO
SJALS LOuGEG BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS /P FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 43 0
• • aaaaa
�t•aaaa�
��aaaaa
r,�aaaaa
r,�aaaaa'
19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
�I�—f'I TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES 0 NO
SJALS LOuGEG BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS /P FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 43 0
o A Cv^�s��l
_GAR_ NESS ENGINEERING GROUP,
Ltd. �� .4 y •'••:y
a.•+..-..�.+ CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS
7101 L AU OW. SUFE 101 • NjoloWL N •5701 • .110ME: (W)M7-9179 • M (907AW-72N • 1OeSOL• ,wny w oY wW4.t0„1 •
SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE 12. PROPOSED LOT 29 O •' e e A. arness;'
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/10/2002ACV
It
QOop
M CE
(fee ORGANICS �O �oleaallo
TEST HOLE 29 00000
1 GM/ML
2
3
4
5
...
10'
6/10/2002
9'-10'
6/19/2002
'::•: S•
SP W/
• •
IIIIIIIII
6
111191
SOME SM LENSES
%//%
a SOME GRAVEL
7
:;:; ;
THROUGHOUT
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
10'
6/10/2002
9'-10'
6/19/2002
>
IIIIIIIII
��aaaaa
111191
%//%
MM,
���aaaaa
'��aaaaa
HNN
•
!�+�
IIIIIIIII
�
�I1I�tIl
���
•
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
10'
6/10/2002
9'-10'
6/19/2002
I,��aaaaa
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
19� PERCOLATION RATE 1.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEC, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THISWA E FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: S S
• • 99909
I,��aaaaa
��aaaaa
!��aaaaa
���aaaaa
'��aaaaa
19� PERCOLATION RATE 1.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEC, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THISWA E FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: S S
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
------ ----�� CONSULTANTS 3 GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBOWISION; PHASE g2, PROPOSED LOT 30
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 6/10/2002
DEPTH
(feetFR.
ORGANICS
TEST HOLE 31GM/ML
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SM W/
ML LENSES
THROUGHOUT
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
SOIL
DRY
6/10/2002
DRY
GW
GP
11:39
SP
•R
ML
—
2
12:09
30
4'
2-
CIL
12:09
—
6'
—
4
12:39
30
SW
2-
MH
12:39
—
SID
—
CH
1:09
30
SM
X
OH
;. ,a
,��
SC
SM W/
ML LENSES
THROUGHOUT
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
DRY
6/10/2002
DRY
6/19/2002
11:39
—
6'
—
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/11/2002 1
11:39
—
6'
—
2
12:09
30
4'
2-
3
12:09
—
6'
—
4
12:39
30
4'
2-
5
12:39
—
6'
—
6
1:09
30
4'
2-
19 PERCOLATION RATE 15 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT.
20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH CALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WASER ORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 6 S S
G_AR_N_ISS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3701 L NW011 Now, SW IL 101 • MHCHW A"C w 99W7 • P - (YO)W73 119 • rut (W7) -32M • M TL Va^�w^W`ro.wrn
SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDMSION; PHASE A2, PROPOSED LOT 31
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/10/2002
(fePTH et) ORGANICS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
1
CLOCK NET TIME
TIME (MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
— —
1GW =zzzl
ORG
• IIIIIIIIIML
— 1
11.111!11GM%//%CL
6'
HHH
/00
•
0_%
IIIIIIIIIMH
SP
CH
II!llllliX
•
.. ,..
�•�,.Sc
DEPTH TO DATE
GROUNDWATER
9. 6/10/2002
9. 6/19/2002
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK NET TIME
TIME (MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6 11 2002 1
— —
6'
—
2
— 1
0'
6'
3
— —
6-
4
— 1
0'
6-
5-
6
— 1
0'
6'
PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT.
A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑YES NNO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH CALL
P(1MMrNTC-
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WASR ORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 0
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
iwi L7iwaa -naw. r..: co»ue-.u.e • •rasnc: o•�.»•ro�•••ro•••
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE #2, PROPOSED LOT 32
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH ____
(feet) ORGANICS TEST HOLE #3221
1 GM/ML
PERCOLATION
�•�:•:•
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
.•...�•
GW
ORG
.. �.•.•
GP
---- ML
�•: i i•
GM
CL
"�'•'•
••
SP
GC
OL
q
••••
.�.•.�•
:.•.•
�. •0• o SW
MH
SEE ATTAC
H E D
5
•: ••••
• • • • SP
CH
':�•:•:
.. ;.:.•
SM
, ' °"
DRAWINGSC
': �': •:
7
�.
DEPTH
DATE
�•
GROUNDWATER
8
5.5'
6/11/2002
5.5'
6/19/2002
9—
to-
1011
CLOCK
NET TIME WATER LEVEL
NET DROP
DATE READING
11
TIME
(MINUTES) READING
(INCHES)
6/11/2002
1 —
— 6"
—
12
2 —
1 0"
6"
13
3-
4 —
1 0"
6-
14—
5 —
— 6"
—
6 —
1 0"
6-
"15161718
15-
16-
17-
18—
PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
19
TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.0 FT. AND 4.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES E NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY CEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PEWORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: '
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3701 L TUDOR NOW. SUNS 101 • M,C"WN L MC 99507 • N - (W)337] 179 • FN (610793 1241 • K TL ,nwwp+wNp.m„
SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE A2, PROPOSED LOT 33
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTum (feeORGANICS TEST HOLE #331
K
3
SP WITH
......
a .:����: LEML/CLOP
THROUGHOUT
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
3.5'
6/11/2002
2.5'
6/19/2002
31191
vZZ04,
✓/%
NNE
•
1111111111
w 4
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
3.5'
6/11/2002
2.5'
6/19/2002
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING CLOCK NET TIME WATER LEVEL NET DROP
TIME (MINUTES) READING (INCHES)
19� PERCOLATION RATE _ (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. — (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN FT. AND FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ❑NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY:
CON,IJENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: g 1
_GARNESS .ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
,..e....e....�..ve. CONSULTANTS E GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3701 L T O RYO. SUIE 101 . NKnOMGE, F 00307 • 0104[: 007)337-6170 • F" 007)336-33N • • TL pnw.rq•r0p.iem
SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE #2; PROPOSED LOT 33A
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
(feet)
( )
==--
ORGANICS
GM/ML
TEST HOLE 33
I "A�l°PFoiesslo^oc�
�00000�
1
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
2
SM W/
'b-0`• GW ccc_ ORG
SP LENSES
;7--,4 GPIML
3
THROUGHOUT
GMCL
q
GCOL
�.0
'. •'. o SWMH
SEE ATTACHED
5
0.0.
. .
' SPCH
�•��
66;64.•
�'"'''
SC °"
DRAWING
6
•• 4.44
sc
7
SP
.;
GROUNDWATER DATE
�...'41
8—:
9' 6/11/2002
9. 6/19/2002
y
4.44
4.44
4646•
��•� '�
CLOCK NET TIME WATER LEVEL NET DROP
11
DATE READING
TIME (MINUTES) READING (INCHES)
uo.H
6/11/2002 1 —
— 6' —
12
2 —
2 0' 6-
13
3 —
— 6' —
4 —
2 0" 6"
14
5 —
— 6' —
6 —
2 0' 6"
15-
5161719
16-
17-
PERCOLATION RATE <1
(MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
19
TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.0
FT. AND 4.0 FT.
20
A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED:
❑ YES N NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS jPEqFORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3701 L 111000 POW. S XM 101 • MKnON4L I 99W • RIG.E: (90])]]1-91]9 • FN 901)339-32N • M TL ,arl.•,•.n99.•rY.p.wrn
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE A2: PROPOSED LOT 34
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH ^^ ORGANICS
let) -II j[� II I I II TEST HOLE 34A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GM/ML SOIL
CLASSIFICATIONS
7'
GW
7'-10'
6/19/2002
.-
-
IIIIIIIIIML
Ililll!11GM%//%CIL
��aaada
/.�GC
HHII
•
SOME 06
GRAVEL
-
IIIIIIIIIMH
.CH
I;Itl�ls;
•
,�Sc
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
7'
6/11/2002
7'-10'
6/19/2002
��aaaaa
..... ... . . .. .........
. ..................
p •• a ey . orness:
e CE_79f e`
S RScsQc
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
19� PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.0 FT. AND 4.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY CEG. Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PEWORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 8 0
• •• aaae�a',
��aaaaa
��aaada
��aaaa�
19� PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.0 FT. AND 4.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY CEG. Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PEWORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 8 0
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3701 L1U00N NCO, WT[ 101 • / "W7 . PI,GIL YO] ]-6119 • F/ i07 -3)N - WASM yvmw-,p�rr�
SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION PHASE 12; PROPOSED LOT 34.
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 7/11/2005
PH
(feet) ORGANICS
TEST HOLE 348
1
DEPTH TO DATE
GROUNDWATER
8.5' 7/11/2005
4��y. .......°.
vJ......... �...
ey A. Garness:
CE -79 3Ja
i°Q�oG
,Pro f eseio�°ate/
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
rr
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
SOIL CLASSIFICATIO�5-
rr
rr
—
6-
r
2
r
CM
0'
6'
3
r
—
r
—
4
I
GWtzzz::-
0'
6'
OR
rr
rr
—
6'
—
6
rr
rr
GP
0'
nuuulMLI
rr
rr
rr
rr
rr
I
r1
I
II
�II!11GM
H/NN•CL
GC
OL
SM
IIIIIIIIIMH
I
I
-
%//%CH
SM%'.G�
•
Sc
DEPTH TO DATE
GROUNDWATER
8.5' 7/11/2005
4��y. .......°.
vJ......... �...
ey A. Garness:
CE -79 3Ja
i°Q�oG
,Pro f eseio�°ate/
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
�r
rr
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
7/11/2005 1
rr
rr
—
6-
—
2
rr
rr
2
0'
6'
3
r
—
r
—
4
rr
2
0'
6'
5
rr
rr
—
6'
—
6
rr
rr
2
0'
6 -
rr
rr
rr
rr
rr
r1
DEPTH TO DATE
GROUNDWATER
8.5' 7/11/2005
4��y. .......°.
vJ......... �...
ey A. Garness:
CE -79 3Ja
i°Q�oG
,Pro f eseio�°ate/
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
7/11/2005 1
11:08
—
6-
—
2
11:10
2
0'
6'
3
11:10
—
6-
—
4
11:12
2
0'
6'
5
11:12
—
6'
—
6
11:14
2
0'
6 -
PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 2 FT. AND 3 FT.
20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: KELLY HEISTUMAN PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: JORDAN TROISI
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS& GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE 12; PROPOSED LOT 35
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH ____ 6' TO 8"
(feet) CF CRV,+.%:CJ TEST HOLE 35
2--I nli{flwGCLSLENSE
SAS
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
71
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
X-2-
6/11/2002
3-
6/19/2002
3-
5/7/2004
2. 8-
5/17/2004
��aaaaa
��aaaa�
K-700
��aaaaa.
NNE
•
ROW
��aaaa�
1 1111111
iiio.
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
X-2-
6/11/2002
3-
6/19/2002
3-
5/7/2004
2. 8-
5/17/2004
SEE ATTACHED
,ffinlaAluo
19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
-Jjl-1II TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.0 FT. AND 2.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, LTD. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WA P RFORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
loom
• • aaaaa
��aaaa�
��aaaaa
��aaaa�
��aaaaa.
��aaaa�
19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
-Jjl-1II TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.0 FT. AND 2.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, LTD. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WA P RFORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS S GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE #2: PROPOSED LOT 36
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH ____ 6' TO 8'
(ft) OF ORGANICS TEST HOLE7j 36
2A P111111
w GCL LENSES
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
• •
•• •
3'-2'
6/11/2002
3'
6/19/2002
3'
5/7/2004
'
5/17/2004
III111111
6-
;11191
—
6-
%//%
4 —
5
0'
6-
BRIM
—
U.N.rM
—
6 —
111111111
0-
6-
MIN
WI
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
3'-2'
6/11/2002
3'
6/19/2002
3'
5/7/2004
2' 8-
5/17/2004
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/12/2002 1 —
—
6-
—
2 —
5
0-
6-
3 —
—
6-
—
4 —
5
0'
6-
5 —
—
1 6"
—
6 —
5
0-
6-
19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
_—jll—lll TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.0 FT. AND 2.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG,
Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS
WAS
PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND
MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
9 1
S aS
GAIINESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBOMSION; PHASE p2: PROPOSED LOT 37
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA. INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH ____ 6' TO 8'
(feet) OF ORGANICS TEST HOLE #37]
3
3 I1N1If1Nw/CLSLE SES
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
4-
6/11/2002
3-
6/19/2002
3-
5/7/2004
2. 8'
5/17/2004
2
3:12
10
11191
2 1/4-
3
MOO,
—
0f
—
4
NNE
10
•
2-
5
3:22
11111111
6-
—
6
3:32
10
4 1/4-
1 3/4-
7
3:32
—
6-
—
8
3:42
10
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
4-
6/11/2002
3-
6/19/2002
3-
5/7/2004
2. 8'
5/17/2004
�� ... ..... - - ys;�� of
4
..�. .. . ...... ...........
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/12/2002 1
3:02
—
6-
—
2
3:12
10
3 3/4-
2 1/4-
3
3:12
—
6-
—
4
3:22
10
4-
2-
5
3:22
—
6-
—
6
3:32
10
4 1/4-
1 3/4-
7
3:32
—
6-
—
8
3:42
10
4 1/2-
1 1/2-
9
3:42
—
6-
—
10
3:52
10
4 1/2-
1 1/2-
11
3:52
—
6-
12 1
4:02
10
4 1/2'
1 1/2"
19� PERCOLATION RATE 6.7 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.0 FT. AND 2.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
-- -- CONSULTANTS 3 GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3101 C MOOR 9WD. 9UOE 101 • Aho" OL M 99507 • PMOW- (9010-9119 • FN (90)"-32N • 9.4 TL 9enrwwp:w-+p.enn
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE #'2, PROPOSED LOT 41
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA• INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH ____
(feet) a==_ ORGANICS ITEST HOLE #4fl
1
K
3
4 II 1111
TLENSESIN
OP 3 FEET
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
6.5'
6/11/2002
5'-10-
6/19/2002
4:38
—
6-
—
-
5:08
IIIIIIIII
4 3/4-
111191
3
5:08
MOO,
6'
rZA
4
5:38
NNfI
•
MY
5
5:38
IIIIIIIII
6-
RINI
-
6:08
����.
4 3/4"
111911!
�id�
•
M�;;
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
6.5'
6/11/2002
5'-10-
6/19/2002
4:38
—
6-
—
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/11/2002 1
4:38
—
6-
—
2
5:08
30
4 3/4-
1 1/4-
3
5:08
—
6'
—
4
5:38
30
1 4 3/4-
1 1/4-
5
5:38
—
6-
—
6
6:08
30
4 3/4"
1 1/4 -
PERCOLATION RATE 24 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
19
TEST RUN BETWEEN 2.5 FT. AND 3.5 FT.
20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: 2ACHARAIH GALL
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WASP FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 0
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3701 L IUOOR 1lp.0, SuOE 101 • M,CMOM.GE. N 69302 haltW)W71 1)Y • FN W)3 -32N •f851iE: P^ "V^w�^Y.m^
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE /2, PROPOSED LOT 42
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH
(feet FILL MIXED TEST HOLE 42A
w/ ORGANICS
2
3
6 I �If1#1
LENSES
1 I}}tl}(}f+}1 W/ ML
LENSES
THROUGHOUT
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
it 1 •'
111111111
31191 %//%
i MINIM
111111111
Ow - %//% EE ATTACHED
111111! V,", •
K!`i! DRAWING
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
10'
6/11/2002
11'
6/19/2002
tl�aaatl�a
PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT.
A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. 1, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAq E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: ii D
. • • aaaaa
tl�aaatl�a
��aaaetl�a
tl�aaa�a
tl�aaaaa
�t1laaa�tla
t!tltl!■�tl�t���
PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT.
A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. 1, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAq E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: ii D
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE A2, PROPOSED LOT 42
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH ____
(feet) —�y_ ORGANICS TEST HOLE 42B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GM/SM
W/ ML
LENSES
THROUGHOUT
•
��YNLiiI•Tm
CLOCK NET TIME
TIME (MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/11/2002
1
Rm
6'
—
111111111
2
111!11
0'
6-
%//%
3
/.%
6"
—
URN
4
•
0'
6-
111111111
— —
6'
—
6
— 4
0"
1111111
7/N�
•
a
DEPTH TO DATE
GROUNDWATER
DRY 6/11/2002
DRY 6/19/2002
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE
READING
CLOCK NET TIME
TIME (MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/11/2002
1
— —
6'
—
2
— 4
0'
6-
3
— —
6"
—
4
— 4
0'
6-
5
— —
6'
—
6
— 4
0"
6'
19� PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PER170R ED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: d
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS d GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OENALY VIEW SUBOWISION; PHASE /2; PROPOSED LOT 43
PERFORMED FOR: F. ROBERT BELL AND ASSOCIATES DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH ____
(feet) 33�_ TEST HOLE 43
1 =3a= ORGANICS
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
4-
6/11/2002
GM/SM/ML
GW
4:40
•'
6'
GP
2
ML
30
3 3/4-
2 1/4"
CL
5:10
/_%GC
HHII
•
4
SW
30
MH
4'5
2 1/4-
5
5:40
CH
W/ ML LENSES77`-
SM�/.
6
•
30
3 3/4-
2 1/4-
SC
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
4-
6/11/2002
3--7"
6/19/2002
4:40
-
6'
-
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/11/2002 1
4:40
-
6'
-
2
5:10
30
3 3/4-
2 1/4"
3
5:10
-
6'
-
4
5:40
30
3 3/4-
4'5
2 1/4-
5
5:40
-
6"
-
6
6:10
30
3 3/4-
2 1/4-
19 PERCOLATION RATE 13.33 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.5 FT. AND 2.5 FT.
20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
• �S 0
GLtd.ARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, �,., T •. I
CONSULTANTS S GENERAL CONTRACTORS• •
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE d2, PROPOSED LOT 43 YO u rr
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA. INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 QQ CE-
DEPTH
(feet) ___ FILL MIXED TEST HOLE 43
_
1 z_» W/ ORGANICS
8� Jill
ENEG LENSES
THROUGHOUT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
11'
6/11/2002
•CLASSIFICATIONS
6/19/2002
��aaaa�
I.GWI
• .
��aaaa�
IIIIIIIIIML
��aaaaa
I��IIGM
N/HNA
CL
•
0.,00
SWI�IIIIIIIMH
�1ltllll;SMBaa
•
SC
8� Jill
ENEG LENSES
THROUGHOUT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
11'
6/11/2002
11.5'
6/19/2002
��aaaa�
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
t9 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PERQbRMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
aaaaa
��aaaa�
��aaaaa
��aaaa�
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
t9 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PERQbRMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.�;
CONSULTANTS d GENERAL CONTRACTORS A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE /2. PROPOSED LOT 44
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPT ORGANICS
(reef) — -- TEST HOLE 44
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SOIL
GP TOGP/SP
QLASSIF14BBOW
•.
GW zzzz:
10'
GP
MIL
(�HIM
CL
/.iGCNNN
5:25
•
1"
SW
MH
5:25
-
CH.
-
SM
OH
10
SC
5"
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
9.
6/11/2002
10'
6/19/2002
5:15
-
6"
-
A�
..............
.... .............
A. Ofne55.-
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6 11 2002 1
5:15
-
6"
-
2
5:25
10
1"
5-
3
5:25
-
6"
-
4
5:35
10
1"
5"
5
5:35
-
6"
-
6
5:45
10
1"
5-
7
5:45
-
6'
-
8
5:55
10
1"
5"
9
5:55
-
6"
-
10
6:05
10
1"
5-
11
6:05
-
6"
-
12
6:15
10
1.
5"
19 I I PERCOLATION RATE 2 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
-SIJ- JII TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.5 FT. AND 4.5 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES [-]NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WASP FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE A2: PROPOSED LOT 48
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/12/2002
DEPTH ____
(teey —�—__K__—^_w ORGANICS TEST HOLE 4
1 --II it I ti�1l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GM/SM
w/ SOME
ML LENSES
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
•
10'
'mm>�C
10'-8"
6/19/2002
4:14
• -
6-
—
2
4:44
30
2"
4-
3
4:44
—
/.%
—
4
REHM
30
•
3 1/2-
5
5:14
1I
n
—
6
5:44
30
2 1/2'
3 1/2 -
2-
ODE
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
10'
6/12/2002
10'-8"
6/19/2002
4:14
—
6-
—
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
mob
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/12/2002 1
4:14
—
6-
—
2
4:44
30
2"
4-
3
4:44
—
6-
—
4
5:14
30
1 2 1/2-
3 1/2-
5
5:14
—
6-
—
6
5:44
30
2 1/2'
3 1/2 -
2-
19 PERCOLATION RATE 3.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.5 FT.
20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ONO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: SOS
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
- ---- — CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
0101 L AIW11 RYD, iURC 101 • N4.0WLL MC YYW] • Fn01G-(W1)M7] 572 • FA (W)SX-M" • F[85M 9... q�rYp.wn
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE A2; PROPOSED LOT 46
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA. INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH
�fe1) 0 ORGANICS
TEST HOLE 46A
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
GM/ML SOIL
CLASSIFICATIONS
11.5'
6/11/2002
12'
1GW
:zz:::::
..
4i,
GP111111111ML
��aaaaa
11:111!11Gm%//%CL
��aaaaa
/.%GCNHH
OIL
IIIIIIIIIMH
��aaa�a
0
CH
X111111;•
•
...
SC..
SP TO
GP/SP
W/ SM
LENSES
THROUGHOUT
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
11.5'
6/11/2002
12'
6/19/2002
!���aaaaa
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
®®®®
•'•'
!���aaaaa
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
��aaa�a
PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES E NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. 1, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 8 OS'
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
•--•-•-•--- +.- CONSULTANTS 3 GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBWASION; PHASE 12; PROPOSED LOT 46A
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/11/2002
DEPTH =__= ORGANICS
feet TEST HOLE 468
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SOIL
CLASSIFICATIONS
DRY
6/11/2002
DRY
t
ORG
Gp
ML
CL
/.%GCHHH
•
SW
MH
ilio.CH
SMmoo
•
,:•SC
SP TO
GP/SP
W/ SM
LENSES
THROUGHOUT
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
DRY
6/11/2002
DRY
6/19/2002
��aaaa�
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
19� I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
II II TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
IN ACCORDANCE
• • aaaaa
��aaaa�
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
19� I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
II II TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
IN ACCORDANCE
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
. +----•-�-�+� CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: GENALT 5UeUNINUN VHASE Nr, eKuvuocu
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA. INC.
DEPTH ____ ORGANICS
(feet -11 Ll l l ll 11 TEST HOLE 47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
DRY
7/11/2005
DRY
7/28/2005
1
•.
6-
—
2
111111111
30
31191
6-
3
WZ004
—
/.%
—
4
NNN
•
1 0.
6.
5
IIIIIIIII
—
6.
—
6
3:29
30
0-
lilllli
�/��.
•
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
DRY
7/11/2005
DRY
7/28/2005
1:59
—
6-
—
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
7 11 2005 1
1:59
—
6-
—
2
2:29
30
0.
6-
3
2:29
—
6.
—
4
2:59
30
1 0.
6.
5
2:59
—
6.
—
6
3:29
30
0-
6.
19 I ( PERCOLATION RATE 5.0 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 6 FT. AND 7 FT.
20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: KELLY HEISTUMAN PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: CALEB GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 0 c:-
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS b GENERAL CONTRACTORS
]701 L 10000 PMO. SOOE 101 ' NKIgPAOL N 99507 ' Pltl,i (907)337—•119 ' FN (907)339-31M • KBS1L pnwP.npiwYp.Pem
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE #2, PROPOSED LOT 48
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/10/2002
DEPTH ____
(feet) -�3_ ORGANICS TEST HOLE #48
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GM/SM
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
SEEP m 15'
6/10/2002
DRY
6/19/2002
��aaaa�
111111111
31191
vzz/oll
��aaaaa
/.%
1
URN
•
��aaaaa
IIIIIIIII
.
Illllli
�id�
•
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
SEEP m 15'
6/10/2002
DRY
6/19/2002
��aaaa�
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
19 I I PERCOLATION RATE 1.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
-CJI-JII TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WA P EgRMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
• •• aaaaa
��aaaa�
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
��aaaaa
19 I I PERCOLATION RATE 1.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
-CJI-JII TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WA P EgRMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNLSS ENGINLLRING GROUP, Ltd. o� 4 y
CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS � O
O . ..... .. ...... ..........
3701E MOON R0.0, SUIS 101 • N,C110MG4 M 99301 . P,1p,C: W7)337- In • Fu S07)3 32" • •EB30L Svmrwq„wbS.eun
SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE N2, PROPOSED LOT 49 ( e Garness:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: o CE -79 3
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/10/2002 pp04 ^e . •4
DEPTH
ORGANICS ��4p�o sv0000
TEST HOLE 49
1
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
2
GW =--- ORG
3
:a+it GP ML
GM CL
4 GC OL
fee 0
SP CH SEE ATTACHED
6 SC
5 °" DRAWING
7
81IAIiliil GM/SM
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DEPTH TO DATE
GROUNDWATER
14' 6/10/2002
14' 6/19/2002
DATE READING
CLOCK NET TIME
TIME (MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/10/2002 1-
2
— 5
0'
6-
3
— —
6'
—
4
— 5
0"
6'
5
— —
6-
6
— 5
0'
6 -
PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES 0 NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS E FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 8
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3701 L 190011 90 0, WIE 101 • NK1109i4( N 99507 h1011E: 90))337-1179 • F"- 907J.U1-37N • 9E TL yvnwrpwwrYp_fam
SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE 12, PROPOSED LOT 50
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/10/2002
DEPTH____
(feet) ___� ORGANICS ITEST HOLE #5701
2
3
4
5
61IpI111
vrGMISM
/ SP POCKETS
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
7�`+k GP ML
GM CL
GC OL
s".
SP CH SEE ATTACHED
S ''' °"
SC
DRAWING
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
t2'
6/10/2002
11•-8'
6/19/2002
3:45
—
6-
—
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/10/20021 1
3:45
—
6-
—
2
3:55
10
3 1/2-
2 1/2-
2"3
3
3:55
—
6"
—
4
4:05
10
358'
238"
5
4:05
—
6'
—
6
4:15
10
358-
238"
7
4:15
—
6'
—
8
4:25
10
358'
238'
9
4:25
—
6"
—
10
4:35
10
3 3/4-
2 1/4-
11
4:35
—
6'
—
12
4:45
1 10
3 3/4'
2 1/4 -
PERCOLATION RATE 4.4 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEC. Ltd. I. JEFFREY A. GARNESS. CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS p FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 1 O
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE /2; PROPOSED LOT 51
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 6/12/2002
DEPTH
(feet) ORGANICS TEST HOLE 51
1
K
A
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GM/SM
DEPTH TO DATE
GROUNDWATER
10' 6/12/2002
10' 6/19/2002
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
HIM
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6 12 2002 1
•.
—
6'
—
111111111
4:26
31191
1"
5-
MOE
4:26
/.%
6"
—
NHH
4:36
•
MOW
5"
5
111111111
—
ow
-
6
iiio.
10
IIIIIII
5-
7
1'o
•
6"
—
8
DEPTH TO DATE
GROUNDWATER
10' 6/12/2002
10' 6/19/2002
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6 12 2002 1
4:16
—
6'
—
2
4:26
10
1"
5-
3
4:26
—
6"
—
4
4:36
10
1"
5"
5
4:36
—
6"
—
6
4:46
10
1"
5-
7
4:46
—
6"
—
8
4:56
10
1"
5-
9
4:56
—
6-
—
10
5:06
10
1"
5'
11
5:06
—
6"
—
12 1
5:16
1 10
1"1
5'
19� PERCOLATION RATE 2 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.5 FT.
20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: E YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS FERYORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.
CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDMSION: PHASE /2; PROPOSED LOT 52
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/12/2002
DEPTH
(teet--11191tT7;1lORGAN:CS ITEST HOLE 52
t
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GM/SM/ML
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
•
SEEP ® 12.5'
mm
9.5'
mm
•'
-
6'
111111111
2
111191
30
%//a.
4'3
2 3/4-
/.%
4:48
MIN
•
-
4
111111111
30
�
2'5
2 1/2-
iiia.
5:14
� I1:,;
6'
�,�a
•
5:48
30
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
SEEP ® 12.5'
6/12/2002
9.5'
6/19/2002
4:18
-
6'
-
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
6/12/2002 1
4:18
-
6'
-
2
4:48
30
3 1/4-
4'3
2 3/4-
3
4:48
-
6'
-
4
5:18
30
1 3 1/2-
2'5
2 1/2-
5
5:14
-
6'
-
6
5:48
30
3 1/2'
2 1/2-
19 I I PERCOLATION RATE 12 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
-Jjl SII TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT.
20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEC, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Lt
���• CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS —�
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: utrvuT auourviniv. ��� s -
PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC.
DEPTH —_ ORGANICS
(fee ITEST HOLE - 5N
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
SEEP 0 12'
7/11/2005
10'
7/28/2005
• -
—
6.
—
111111111
2:32
II.III!11
0'
6
3
2:32
—
6�
—
4
Hum
30
0'
6.
5
3:02
—
6.
—
_
3:32
30
0'
I
lilt:
��6
•
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
SEEP 0 12'
7/11/2005
10'
7/28/2005
2:02
—
6.
—
•0
:*l
.. f ,ro r mess
SEE ATTACHED
DRAWING
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
7 11 2005 1
2:02
—
6.
—
2
2:32
30
0'
6
3
2:32
—
6�
—
4
3:02
30
0'
6.
5
3:02
—
6.
—
6
3:32
30
0'
6.
PERCOLATION RATE 5.0 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. b (INLHtW
19
TEST RUN BETWEEN 5 FT. AND 6 FT.
20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ONO
^,AFD BV: KELLY HEISTUMAN PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: CALEB GALL
COMMENTS:
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS. CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE !FORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: g U