Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVALLEY EDGE S-11260-1Onsite File Valley Edge #S11260-1 WNEERING Date: 5/20/05 MEMO Steve Eng, PE, PH 17237 Bear Paw Circle, Eagle River AK 99577 (907) 694-7028 tel (907) 694-7026 fax NorthRimEng@aol.com To: Dan Roth Program Manager On -Site Water & Wastewater Program Subject: Impact On Nitrate Levels Valley Edge Subdivision, Phase I & 11 Number of Pages: 1 During May 6-10, 2005, an aquifer test was conducted on the proposed Valley Edge Subdivision, Phases I & II. This subdivision contains 16 large lots, ranging from I to 2+ acres in size. Two new water wells were drilled and a third existing well (F&R Subdivision, Lot 3, Block 1) was used for the test. MOA records were reviewed to determine nitrate levels in the area. The existing well on F&R Subdivision, Lot 3, Block 1 has previously been sampled for nitrate, at a level of 1.8 mg/l. Another nearby well also has reported a low nitrate level; F&R Subdivision, Lot 1, Block I tested at 2.21 mg/I. The large lots which are proposed should have a minimal impact on nitrate levels in the area due to on-site wastewater disposal systems. A large flowing upper aquifer was verified during the aquifer test. This will provide a substantial dilution effect to any produced nitrates. I have conducted nitrate models in the past for similar conditions and the results generally are negligible in terms of elevated nitrate levels within the aquifer. n STEVEN- �o W. ENO a ,y. jr V ,r NEERIrI NNG— Northitim Engineering 17237 Bear Paw Circle Eagle River, AK 99577 907.694.7028 May 13, 2005 Dan Roth Manager, MOA On -Site Program 4700 Bragaw St Anchorage, AK 99519 RE: Proposed Valley Edge Subdivision Aquifer Test Dear Dan, An aquifer test was conducted for the referenced subdivision in accordance with MOA guidelines. This is a large lot single family subdivision. I have included report & supporting data. If there is need for additional information or clarification please give me a call. Sincerely, Steve Eng, PE, PH Enclosure: Aquifer Report Cc: Wildwood Development Proposed Valley Edge Subdivision Aquifer Test Steve Eng, PE, PH Summary: 1 During May 6-10, 2005, an aquifer test was conducted on the proposed Valley Edge Subdivision, Phases I & II. This subdivision contains 16 large lots, ranging from 1 to 2+ acres in size. Two new water wells were drilled and a third existing well was used for the test. Permits for the well sites were obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage On -Site Water and Wastewater Program. The two new wells were test -bailed by Sullivan Water Wells. One new well demonstrated a high flow, and the other new well yielded a lower flow, not unusual for a bedrock well. The existing well also produced a good yield. The three wells are summarized as: 1. Lot 5 Block 1: This 74 foot well was pumped @ 30 gpm for 24 hours. This was immediately followed by a 24 hour recovery period. This well exhibited a strong yield and most likely could produce a much higher flow; especially if screened. The open well terminates within the unconsolidated glacial lateral moraine. 2. Lot 6 Block 1: This 280 foot well was pumped @ 3.3 gpm for 4 hours. This is a bedrock well. This well was completely drawn down to the 214 foot level and stabilized at a constant flow rate via a valve. 3. Lot 3 Block 1 F & R Subdivision: This is an existing 100 foot well. The homeowner's existing well pump was used in a 4 hour flow test. The existing well was pumped @ 6.5 gpm with minimal draw down. This well is also capable of higher flow rate. An evaluation of the data gathered is summarized below. Data was graphed on semi -logarithmic sheets to determine aquifer transmissivity and storage coefficient. May 6,2005: A 24 hour flow test on Lot 5 Block 1 began @ 1000. The well was pumped at a constant rate of 30 gpm for the 24 hours. Drawdown eventually stabilized at 58' 4'. This well could produce a much higher flow if screened and developed. Transmissivity was calculated for the discharge well for the draw -down. The well curve on the semi -logarithmic plot demonstrates a flat draw -down over time, indicating a strong yielding well. T = 8785 GPD/FT (Discharge Well Draw -Down) The two observation wells on Lots 6 & 3 were monitored. These observation wells responded during the test, but at minor draw downs, indicating a good storage capacity. Storage coefficients were determined to be 0.8 and 0.56, respectively. ���NEERING Steve Eng, PE, PIi May 7 & 8, 2005: The 24 hour draw -down test on Lot 5 was concluded @ 1000, immediately followed by a 24 hour recovery test. The well demonstrated a strong recovery and was fully recovered in 4 hours. The Transmissivity was calculated for the discharge well for the recovery and compared favorably with the value determined form the draw -down. T = 8064 GPD/Fr (24 Hour Discharge Well Recovery) The two observation wells on Lots 6 & 3 were again monitored. Lot 6 was almost fully recovered within the 24 hours and Lot 3 did fully recover. The 24 hour recovery concluded on May 8. May 10, 2005: The two observation wells were pumped for 4 hours and recovery monitored. Lot 6 was completely pumped down to the 214' pump intake @ 10 gpm. The flow was then adjusted via a valve to a continual flow of 3.3 gpm. A transmissivity was calculated from the recovery period. This value is much less than the high -flowing upper aquifer. It is not atypical for a bedrock well. The two other wells were used as observation wells and had slight draw downs The transmissivity is higher at the highest draw down on the bedrock well: T = 10 GPD/FT (Average Well Recovery) T = 34 GPD/FT (Initial Well Recovery) The existing well on Lot 3 was drawn down a maximum of 4.2' over the 4 hour test pump. The other two wells did not have a draw down; this is because Lot 3 is higher in elevation than the two wells and did not have a significant enough draw -down to affect these two wells. It is likely that the Lot 3 well has a higher well yield capability. If a larger pump were utilized for draw -down, a higher transmissivity would likely be calculated. T = 365 GPD/FT (Well Draw -Down) Lot 5 Lot 3 Existing Well 2 3 S ��` k ►► it i i- j . G L.SB( PUMPING TEST Discharge Well Location ofVA�L:yCDsr— Owner: W1 W_boc7 DE✓r�JPM��.I% Well Depth: Casing Depth. -_73 Top of casing to static 53 (Driller) Date Drilled: zs QOriller: Sullivan Well Log: Yes Test Date: S < oS 3a QPM DRAWDOWN RECOVERY 5-/7/05 0 0011 0 46 BI PUMPING TEST Observation Well Location of Well:,vRo P V41 a.£./ 6 BC Omcn Wie-A too o A DE✓/�, Observation Well Depth:Z Casing Depth: Top of casing to staticU 9 (Driller) Date Drilled: rl oSDriller: Sullivan Well Log: Yes Test Date: S � oS RECOVERY /0 m__==mm__=mm_ ©__=mmm©__ ' � __ /0 PUMPING TEST Observation Well Location of Well:Fa%Z 1-381 Owner: wit.nujcoA Dia-. Observation Well Depth: jo Casing Depth:_ Top of casing to static riller Date Drilled: Driller: Well Log: A49 A/'o Test Date: e RECOVERY It PVrL+Pr'1} 1 v 6P� TO pump L 5diV- 3.3 GPM 1-1;111 PUMPING TEST Observation Well-4 Hour Flow Location of We11:PPar'. Wufil eFACE Owner: U11z-Jded0 PF✓`t-OP Well Depth: W 0 Casing Depth: L3 Top of casing to static y9 (Driller) Date Drillcd 2 Driller: Sullivan Well Log: Yes Test Date: S /o oS' Pnn,nod well AF'T•'-2/n a CPm Observation Wells 12 ©mmmmm©mommmmmI 12 PUMPING TEST Observation Well 4 Hour Flow Location of Well: F-A)P L3 61 Owner: I/J/tt>&WG I>f✓F� Well Depth: /a ° Casing Depth:_ Top of casing to static (Driller) Date Drilled: Driller: 990W Well Log: X40 We) Test Date: Sh d LoS Pumped Well 6P, 9-. S 47JeA Observation Wells No e-(*,gA 6 13 GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS. 101 • w�. wear . -•if. w • ' SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EDGE SUBDIVISION; LOT 5, BLOCK 2, PERFORMED FOR: WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 4/14/2D04 (i °t oRcrwlcs EST HOLE 1 7 6 9 10 �I LI I I II POCKET IGF MIL D 11 - 12- 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER DRY 4/14/2004 DRY 4/22/2004 f y A Gamess CE -793 d SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING CLOCK I NET TIME I WATER LEVELJ NET DROP TIME (MINUTES) READING I (INCHES) 19 1 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: CALEB CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY CEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS of oORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: SOIL F • •7.r, GP TO CM GW 755=7 • . i'44WA;!tj GP111111111 ' 111h[HaGM CL GC • IIIIIIIIIMH 4#SP%//%CH SM OH i; ••'%'�SC 7 6 9 10 �I LI I I II POCKET IGF MIL D 11 - 12- 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER DRY 4/14/2004 DRY 4/22/2004 f y A Gamess CE -793 d SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING CLOCK I NET TIME I WATER LEVELJ NET DROP TIME (MINUTES) READING I (INCHES) 19 1 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: CALEB CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY CEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS of oORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. j po(5j -{ CONSULTANTS a GENERAL CONTRACTORS II f LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EDGE SUBDIVISION; LOT 6. BLOCK 1, PERFORMED FOR: WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 4/14/2004 D( eaoRGANIcs TEST HOLE 2 1 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8• 9• 10• 11. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GM TO SM DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER DRY 4/14/2004 DRY 4/22/2004 SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING a •. •. WATER LEVEL READING ;• Iilllllll 6:53 — 111:1 — 2 7:23 "M 11 H/NH• 1 3/4- • 7:23 111111111 6- — 4 7:53 30 5' 1' 5 7:53 14,4;1 i 6' DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER DRY 4/14/2004 DRY 4/22/2004 SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 4/16/20041 1 6:53 — 6- — 2 7:23 30 4 1/4 1 3/4- 3 7:23 — 6- — 4 7:53 30 5' 1' 5 7:53 — 6' — 6 8:23 30 5- 1' iB I I PERCOLATION RATE 30 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) I�—JI TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES [3 NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: NICK HEITSTUMAN COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG. Ltd. I. JEFFREY A. GARNESS. CERTIFY THAT THISWAS PERfORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 2i— GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS. SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EDGE SUBOMSION• LOT 7, BLOCK 1, PERFORMED FOR: WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 4/15/2004 DEM (feet) zzzzEST HOLE 3 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER __=Z- ORGANICS 4/16/2004 _ZZZZ AND FILL SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS 2 _ --_ GW _= ORG —_ a t GP ML 3 GM CL GC OL 4 . •°. g SW MH • .•. S SP CH 5 SM i OH SC 6 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE DRY 4/16/2004 DRY 4/22/2004 4 ........... ey arness- �a CF 79 3 pn�•�_ r10 0 -Sr SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING CLOCK I NET TIME WATER LEVELI NET DROP TIME (MINUTES) READING (INCHES) � PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 5.5 FT. 20 CALEB GALL 0 ❑ SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: CALEB GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 6 /100 US GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS. SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EDGE SUBDMSION• LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PERFORMED FOR: WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 4/13/2004 E (fe jetW7 ORGANICS/ ftPqT HOLE 4 1 FILL rA GP TO GM 0 7 10—IIHIIIiiI GM TO SM 11• 12- 13 14 15 16 17 18 • ' II1111111 31141 N/ NNS • ik43d IIIIIIIIISEE WELL AND ik 4' 055 6.E Mtllll� 4.•SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 15, 4/15/2004 12.5' 4/22/200 DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 4/16/2004 1 6:50 - 6- - 2 7:20 30 1' 5' 3 7:20 - 6' - 4 7:50 30 1 2- 4- 5 7:50 - 6. - 6 8:20 30 2- 4' � PERCOLATION RATE 7.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: NICK HErrMMAN COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE ORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: Ex, 8 IF GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. ���c 5 CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS �� A �'. • •'� 2 ISUIL LUU – rLKLULAttuty twit A. mess.• •'. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EDGE SUBDIVISION; LOT 2, BLOCK 2. QO u Y E-795333 .`, PERFORMED FOR: wlLDwooD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 4/15/2004 5/i05cq�� (feet) -:= EST HOLE 5 4p�o�f'�o SW MH 2 SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS -- – – ORG == – ORGANICS/ 'Z- GW – 3 FILL J r+ GPML =_ = GM CL 4 =_– GC OL SW MH SEE WELL AND 5 .�.s Sri off SEPTIC RESERVE 6 SC SITE PLAN 7- 8. 9• 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 GM TO SM DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 14.5' 4/15/200 13.5 4/22/2004 DATE READING CLOCK I NET TIME I NET DROP I T ME (MINUTE) WATER READING ELI (INCHES) � PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 1i (INCt7ts) 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.0 T. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: CALEB CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS ERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: —.52110.1o< GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. ^ CONSULTANTS b GENERAL CONTRACTORS Oo'J. 4 .. .. •••,,,,•.... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EDCE SUBDIVISION: LOT 3, BLOCK 2, PERFORMED FOR: WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 4/15/2004 (iITEST HOLE 6 1 =— = ORGANICS/ --�-_ FILL 2 ___� 3 5-1IHIPH GM/SM 0 IFA �l it$] TO GM 12 13 16 17 DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER DRY 4/15/2004 DRY 4/22/2004 SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING • • . WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) I111�111�11 011141 - N,BN, ,07Z% 1 12 7:36 • 2- 4- IIIIIIIII 7:36 - 6- - �i!L11�1i 8:06 YHB. • 2 -3/4* 3 1/40 5 DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER DRY 4/15/2004 DRY 4/22/2004 SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 4/16/20041 1 7:06 - 6- - 1 12 7:36 30 2- 4- 1 1 7:36 - 6- - 1 14 8:06 30 2 -3/4* 3 1/40 5 8:06 - 6' - 6 8:36 30 2 3/4- 3 1/40 � PERCOLATION RATE 9.2 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: = YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: NICK HEITSTUMAN COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. CARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WASI PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. ppUj:' y CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORSt���� - ...... ... ..... .......... t t t11 115W (RIPS11 . SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST ... .........:... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EDGE SUBDMSION• LOT 3, BLOCK 2, OQOp '•. ff y Ga ness.• ` PERFORMED FOR: WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 4/15/2004 Q�� s••• , S�l��c4`F• (fPTHr 40�dproffs ofo eet)1 �0400�� 1 2- 3— W c� 4 na Z 5 0 6 7 J O 8- 97 9 H 10 O Lt_ 11 Z O 12 Q 13 N 14 Q 15- 16— V) 5 16 N 17 W W N 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE I NET TIME (MINUTES) • - ;@ 4/16/20031 1 II1111111 31141 6. — 2 7:36 RUN 0" M", 3 II1111111 — Al4Y — %q////. IIIlIIi 30 V", 6' 5 8:06 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE I NET TIME (MINUTES) O 2 POE 1 4/16/20031 1 7:06 — SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING CLOCK TIME I NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 4/16/20031 1 7:06 — 6. — 2 7:36 30 0" 6' 3 7:36 — 6. — 4 8:06 30 0' 6' 5 8:06 — 6- — 6 8:36 30 1' 5' PERCOLATION RATE 6 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 0 kINL-MW 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.5 FT. AND 7.0 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: NICK HEITSTUMAN COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: s/ B OS GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & OENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EDGE SUBDMSION; LOT3 BLOCK 2. PERFORMED FOR: WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 4/13/2004 DEM (feet) -= EST HOLE 7 1 = — -- Cl ASSIFICATIONS WATER READING LEVEL SOIL ORGANICS/ GW— ORG 7:09 FILL t: u GP ML GM CL 30 = = GC OL 4 ° .°. SW MH 6. �� • .•. t SP CH 5 SM i OH 6. SC 8:09 6 6. — 7 0 10-IIHIjfj� GM/SM 11- 12- 13- 14 1•12•13•14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER DRY 4/15/2004 DRY 4/22/200 SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING CLOCKTIME(MINUTE) WATER READING LEVEL DROP (IE CHHES) 4/16/2004 1 7:09 — 6. 2 7:39 30 0. 6- 3 7:39 — 6. — 4 8:09 30 0. 6. 5 8:09 — 6. — 6 8:39 30 0. 6. PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. MOLL UTA. o klNk-Mt:Jj 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 5.5 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: NICK HERSTUMAN COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG. Ltd. 1. JEFFREY A. GARNESS. CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE O RMED IN ACCORDANCE 1p WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS& GENERAL CONTRACTORS SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EOCE SUBDMSION; LOT 4 BLOCK 2. PERFORMED FOR: WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 8/19/2004 (f atzz::z:iORGANICS ITEST HOLE 8 i 2- 3- 4. •3•4• 5 6 7 8 9 10—IIHiliH CM/SM 11- 12- 13, 1•12.13 14 15 16 17 18 IGROUNDWATOERI DATE SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN • ® •••. �aaa��a i��%• Ruin _ Illfi�l� 4.6.0. • IGROUNDWATOERI DATE SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. o \INU7CJJ 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 4.5 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ROB CAMBELL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG. Ltd. I. JEFFREY A. GARNESS. CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: S 61 u • ® •••. �aaa��a PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. o \INU7CJJ 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 4.5 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ROB CAMBELL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG. Ltd. I. JEFFREY A. GARNESS. CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: S 61 u GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1 L TMW IOW. Wn i0l • NOUMM K •Ye0] •00716W -•In • Nt: N • AYIL P^—�'a+�P—" SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VALLEY EDGE SUBDN4SION; LOT 7 BLOCK 1, PERFORMED FOR: WILDWDOD DEVELOPMENT DATE: 8/19/2004 (i •t TEST HOLE 9 1 ORGANICS 2 4 3 7 E) 10-IIHIPH GM/SM 11• 12- 13 14 15 16 17 18 IGROUNDWATERI DATE I DRY SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING CT MEK (MINUTE) WATER READING LEVEL NET DROP (INCHES) • • ' 6- Ilillllll 2 — 3 0. MOP 3 — — • 4 IIII11111 0. 6- 5 — — O ill; — �.�.o. • •::� 0. IGROUNDWATERI DATE I DRY SEE WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE SITE PLAN DATE READING CT MEK (MINUTE) WATER READING LEVEL NET DROP (INCHES) 8 20 2004 1 — — 6- — 2 — 3 0. 6• 3 — — 6- 4 — 3 0. 6- 5 — — 6. — 6 — 3 0. 6• PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 0 llrvLnrW 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 4.5 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ROB CAMBELL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: • IN ACCORDANCE