The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutT12N R3W SEC 33 LT 207ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUgh'TI DJ:rARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL OUALf~ 3500 TUDOR ROAD ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99507 279-8686 INSPECTION REPORT ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM MAILING NAME ~///P/~/~' ~--~-~/~ ADDRESS LOCATION /~/~-:-~//'~ /~'~j~("~..d~. LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEPTIC TANK: /f/~7-~ .-~'.~'~' __/f~r~ ~,~.C/~-/7/,,/.~ ~.~/~) DISTANCE FROM WELL /'P~ / LIQUID CAPACITY/'~/"--/~;'~ GALLONS. NUMBER OF d~ MATERIAL --~.-~'~--~"- COMPARTMENTS ' ~P,.P-~d~- ~P~-~ ~-'~ '~"~'~J~/~ LIQUID INSIDE LENGTH INSIDE WIDTH DEPTH SEEPAGE SYSTEM: SEEPAGE PIT: .~)K'/./J~7.'f/~-~ --//~/~'~'~-~ P~P~' NUMBER OF PITS LINING MATERIAL NEAREST LOT LINE OUTSIDE DIAMETER / OR WIDTH ~, LENGTH ~ DEPTH ~/'~/z~'~-~-~/~z~/~--~ DISTANCE FROM WELL ./~-?/) / BUILDING FOUNDATION~'' TOTAL EFFECTIVE ABSORPTION AREA (WALL AREA) SQ. FT. TILE DRAIN FIELD: DISTANCE FROM WELt ~ ~~NEAREST LOT LINE NUMBER OF LINES ./'~DISTANCE BETWEEN LINES \ TRENCH~ ABSORPTION AREOLA SQ. FT. LENGTH OF EACH LINE TOTAL LENGTH , OF LINES , . IN, TOTAL EFFECTIVE DEPTH: TOP OF TILE TO FINISH GRADE DEPTH OF FILTER MATERIAL BENEATH TILE IN. ABOVE TILE-- WELL: LOT LINE .~'//~ ~;~ DISTANCE FROM TYPE ,..,~,~,~/z/,,~..?~.~"' , DEPTH ~' / , BUILDING FOUNDATION p~/~. NEAREST ~ SEPTIC ~ SEEPAGE ~ ' , SEWER LINE~ ~ ,TANK /~ , SYSTEM WATER _SAMPLE /;f~ , NEAREST /~/~"(~ OTHER '~'.Y ,/'/~, . · CESSPOOL~'~'',/-d~/'~'~/-~, SOURCES'"c~:'#'J/ DISTANCES: DATE DIAGRAM OF SYSTEM APPROVED ~'~' ~ G.A.A.B. GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM -- APPLICATION AND PERMIT PERMIT NO. MAIL]N(; ADDRESS . PHONE NAME OF APPLICANT INSTALLATION LOCATION ~/> TYPE AND $]ZE Of faCILiTY TO be SERVED FINANCED THROUGH TO BE INSTALLED BY . , /~ SOIL TEST RESULTS ~ ~ FINAL INSPECTION: 24 HOUR NOT~CE REQUIRED. BACKFILLING OF ANY SYSTEM WITHOUT FINAL INSPECTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AUTHORITY WILL BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION, SEPTIC TANK SIZE /'~//~///~/ TYPE ~r~_~ SEEPAGE AREA SIZE ~//~ TYPE DIAGRAM OF SYSTEM MINIMUM DISTANCES, REQUIREMENTS SEPTIC TANK TO SEEPAGE PIT WALL. /~/~/ DRAIN FIELD TO NEAREST LOT LINE. SEPTIC TANK, · SEEPAGE PIT ALSO CONSIDER AREA WELLS. ___, SEEPAGE Pit DRAIN FIELD CAST IRON ]NTO AND OUT OF SEPTIC TANK AND INTO CRIB CROSSING GAP OF EXCAVATION 5 FEET INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL. 4 INCH DIAMETER CAST IRON SIPHON PIPES ON SEPTIC TANK AND SEEPAGE PIT FITTED WITH AIRTIGHT REMOVABLE CAPS. CONFORM TO BOROUGH REGULATIONS REGARDING INSTALLATION- I CERT)FY THAT [ AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH ORDINANCE NO, 28-68 AND THAT THE ABOVE i ~ DATE RECEIVED · INSPECTION APPOINTMENTS TIME TIME ,NSPECTO i NSPECTtI:~/ ~\" I NSPECT¢~ / ) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 825 LStreet-Anchorage, Alaska 99501 AU~ 2 ~ 9~0 ENVl RON~ENTAL SANITATION DIVISION Telephone 264-4720 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF INDIVIDUAL WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES DIRECTIONS: Complete all parts on page 1. Incomplete requests will not be proce~ed. Please allow ten (10) days for processing. 1. PROPERTY OWNER PHONE MAI LING ADDRESS PROPERTY~NT {If different from above) PHONE PHONE 5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 6. TYPE OF RESIDENCE ,~ SINGLE FAMILY [] MULTIPLE FAMILY 7. WATER SUPPLY INDIVIDUAL* [] COMMUNITY [] PUBLIC UTI LITY NU~MBER OF~BEDROOMS ~ One [] Four [] Other ~ Two [] Five ./~ Three [] Six * ATTACH WELL LOG. A well log is required for all wells drilled since June 1975. For wells drilled prior to that date, give well depth (attach log if available,) 8. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ~ INDIVIDUAL/ON-SITE** [] PUBLIC UTI LITY YEAR ON-SITE SYSTEM WAS INSTALLED. NOTE: THE INSPECTION FEE MUST ACCOMPANY EACH REQUEST BEFORE PROCESSING CAN BE INITIATED. THIS SIDE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 1. TYPE OF RESIDENCE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS · [] SINGLE FAMILY [] ONE [] THREE [] FIVE [] OTHER [] MULTIPLE FAMILY [] TWO [] FOUR [] SIX PERMIT NUMBER 2. WATER SUPPLY [] INDIVIDUAL DEPTH OF WELL [~ COMMUNITY DATE DRILLED [] PUBLIC UTILITY Connection Verified LOG RECEIVED 3. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT NUMBER [] INDIVIDUAL/ON -SITE DATE INSTALLED [~PUBLIC UTILITY ,;;-~,~ ~ ~ Connection Verified INSTALLER []Septic Tank or []Holding Tank Size: I~-~ (~ If Tank is homemade SOILSRATING give dimensions: TYPE OF TANK MANUFACTURER TOTAL ABSORPT,ON AREA MATER,AL 5. COMMENTS / ~ONDITIONAL APPROVAL (letter must~npany certificate) 72-010 (Rev, 6/79) October 2, 1980 R&M No. 051001-70 Mr. Ronald K. Russell Post Office Box 10-1521 Anchorage, Alaska 99511 Re: Adequacy Test on Existing Sanitary Sewer System; Consisting of a Septic Tank with a Seepage Pit; T12N, R 3W, Sec. 33, Lot 207 N~&S~ Anchorage, Alaska Dear Mr'. Russell: Per your request of August 28, 1980, Dan Cooper of R&M Consultants con- ducted a test of the sanitary sewer system on the above described property. The test indicates acceptance rates determined under conditions at the time tested. Actual system performance over long periods of time depend on factors which cannot be evaluated by this test thus our office cannot warrant the suitability or fitness of the system for either an extended period of time or for user demand in excess of the expected flow noted herein. Factors affecting system performance include: O O Actual use demand on the system; Fluctuations in groundwater levels; Physical conditions of the septic system, leach field, trench or seepage pit and soil. It should be noted that while a septic tank and seepage pit disposal system is one of the most reliable methods of sewage treatment and disposal it is nearly certain that the leach field or seepage pit will fail sometime during the useful life of the structure. Studies indicate leach fields, trenches and pits have a life expectancy of ten to twelve years under optimum conditions. All septic systems have a finite hydraulic loading capacity which can be expected to decrease with time. Mr. Ronald Russell .October 2, 1980 Page. 2 Because the house on the lot is occupied, we assume that the seepage pit was at its normal degree of saturation. During this test the liquid level in the septic tank was monitored as water was added to the system. The measurements are summarized in the following table: FIRST DAY Date: September 29j 1980 Remarks: No standpipe to seepage pit. Water Added To Septic Tank Liquid Level Measurements Taken From Top Of Standpipe TIME GALLONS TOTAL LIQUID ADDED GALLONS LEVEL 2:45 0 0 3:55 2:57 50 50 3:45 3:08 50 100 3.4 3:21 50 150 3.35 3:33 50 200 3.3 3:45 50 250 3.25 3:55 50 300 3.2 4:05 50 350 3.15 4:15 50 400 3.1' 4:25 50 450 3.1' 4:35 50 500 3.05' Remarks: Standpipe has no cap. This could cause freezing of the system during cold weather due to induced draft through the building vent stacks. Mr. Ronald Russell October 2, 1980 Page ,3 Date: September 30, 1980 SECOND DAY GALLONS TOTAL LIQUID ADDED GALLONS LEVEL 10:32 0 0 3.45' 10:43 50 50 3.45' 10:54 50 100 3.4' 11:03 50 150 3.35' 11:13 50 200 3.3' 11:23 50 250 3.3' 11:34 50 300 3.2' 11:44 50 350 3.2' 11:54 50 400 3.15' 12:04 50 450 3.1' 12:14 50 500 3.05' Date: October 1, 1980 THIRD DAY - Septic Tank Level 3.45'. The meter used during the test was a Rockwell 5/8" standard water meter which had previously been calibrated by R&M Consultants, Inc. The total daily load for the three bedroom residence is four-hundred fifty (450) gallons; surge capacity is three-hundred sixty (360) gallons. The Municipality requires the system to accept a surge capacity of 80% of the total daily load at a rate of ten (10) gallons per minute, tested for a two day period and to accept the total daily load in twenty-four (24) hourS. Mr. Ronald Russell Oct.ober 2, 1980 Page ,4 Failure Criteria is as follows: 1. Water rises excessively in septic tank at or before 80% of total added. 2. Effluent overflowing system. 3. Water level does not return to within one inch of static level. load The first day of testing, the system accepted five-hundred (500) gallons in one-hundred ten (110) minutes which is more than 100% of the total daily load. The second day of testing, the system accepted five-hundred (500) gallons in one-hundred two (102) minutes which is more than 100% of the total daily load. The static water level on the third day had returned to within one-inch of the initial static water level. We therefore conclude that the system is disposing of effluent at an adequate rate for a typical three bedroom residence. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. please contact us if you have any questions concerning this test or if we can be of additional service. Very truly yours, R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Richard S. Giessel Senior Engineer DC: RSG/jatb GREATER ANCHOPAG.~ AREA BOROUGH Department of Environmental quality 3500 Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99507 279-8686 Date Received Date of Ins~ection REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF INDIVIDUAL SEWER & WATER FACILITIES FOR Prooertv ~ner: ~~ Legal Description: .~~/~. /~. 3~, Phone Phone Type of Facility to be Inspected: Number of Bedrooms: ~ Well Data: A. T~e C. Constructf on/~,~'~/~,z~/z~~ B. Depth 0~,/-/~ _ D. Bacterial Anelysis Or ' s. 7. Sewage Disoosal System: O. Septic Tank: 1. D, Seepage P&%: 1. S~ze 2. E. Disposal Field: 8. Installer ------- Manufacturer~'~.~-~..J3'~ Material ~/-,6~-~' Total Length of Lines ~/~ . Distances: / / Area ~/~ Absorption Sewer Lines Other Contamination B. Foundation to Septic T~nk C. Absorotion Area to Nearest Lot Line ' -- '*R%quest for Approval of ~,ldivfdua] Sewer & Water Facilities Page Two Approval Valid for One Year From Date Signed Greater Anchorage Area Borough, Department of Environmental Quality DIAGRAM OF SYSTEM I certify that the information contained in this request' for appreval to be a true and accurate representation of the subject sewer and water fac~!tties located at: Signed Dage