Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEQUESTRIAN HEIGHTS S-6875 SUBDIVISION CASE REVIEW STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION DATE: SITE: April 20, ].983 50.1 acres CASE: S-6875 BAVARIAN HEIGNT SUBD. (Cluster Subdivision) Unsubdivided land into 40 lots and 3 tracts and vacation of rights-of-way. LAND USE: TOFO: Undeveloped Varies ZONING: R-6 COMPREHENSIVE P ]hA N DENSITY BEFORE: CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING AREAS: LAND USE: ZONING: SOILS: Attached VEGETATION: Scrub Spruce and Undergrowth 40 DUA AFTER: 40 DUA Residential INTENSITY: Less than 1 DUA NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST .............. Developing Residential .............. FI NDIt~GS: Utilities have been requested. Public Works request the following: a. A subdivision agreement to construct all interior roads to suburban interior standards. b. Resolving the need to construct ~Jorthfield Drive to suburban access standards from the subdivision to Rabbit Creek Road. c. A subdivision agreement to construct 142nd Avenue to suburban peripheral access standards from Go].denview Drive to the end of the cul-de-sac. d. A subdivision agreement to construct Pickett Street to suburban peripheral access st:andards from the south end of Lot 9, Block 3 to 142nd Avenue. e. Resolving drainage and drainage easements with Public Works Engineering. Planning Staff Analysis Case No. S-6875 Page 2 4. 5. 6. f. Resolving need for a wetlands permit. g. Resolving the need for footing drains, footing drain stub-outs. h. Resolve the need for engineered foundations· i. Resolve the need for erosion and sedimentation control plan. j. Removing the well from the right-of-way, or moving the right-of-way outside of the well location· k. Resolving the need for temporary turnarounds. 1. Prior to the filing of the plat 24-month monitoring program to review the functioning and the proposed curtain draining system· Public Works recommends denial of vacations· Traffic Engineering has no objection to the plat, requests a subdivision agreement for street name signs, traffic control devices· Traffic Engineering has no objection to the requested vacations with the exception of Fernwood Street along the south boundary of tract A. DHEP requests a monitoring program for the curtain drain system after installed for a period of 12 months on a montly basis. After that review, the Department of Health would review percolation tests to determine that each lot can function with an on-site septic system· Physical Planning points out that the area is in the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan as non-suitable for on-site septic systems, points out that special require- ments for unsuitable sites be adhered to in the develop- ment of the property· Physical Planning points out that natural vegetation should be maintained wherever possible and that oil, grease separators should be pro- vided at the outfalls of any drainage systems· RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVAL of the vacation on the east boundary, the west boun- dary, the south and north boundaries with the exception of Fernwood Street along the southeast boundary. Subject to Assembly concurrence and filing a suitable replat within 18 months. Recommendation of the plat. APPROVAL of the plat subject to: 1. Resolving utility easements. Planning Case ~o. Page 3 Staff Analysis S-6875 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. Installing the curtain drain system and monitoring that curtain drain system for a period of 12 months with final resolution from the Department of Health and Public Works to determine the effectiveness of the cur- tain drain system and 'the ability of each lot to func- tion with an on-site septic system. Obtaining a wetlands permit from the Corps of Engineers, if required. Providing a soils report from a registered soils engineer indicating which lots may require engineered foundations, and placing an appropriate note on the plat. Resolving drainage and drainage easements with Public Works Engineering. Resolving the need for footing drains, and footing drain stubouts with Public Workd Engineering. Providing a soils sedimentation and erosion control plan prior to plat recording. Removing the well from the right-of-way or moving the right-of-way outside the well location. Resolving the need for any temporary turnarounds with Public Works Engineering. Entering into a subdivision agreement for: a. community water system; b. subdivision agreement to construct all interior roads to suburban interior standards; c. Northfield Drive to suburban access standards from the subdivision to Rabbit Creek Road. d. 142nd Avenue to suburban peripheral access standards from Goldenview Drive to the end of the cul-de-sac along the north boundary of the subdivision, and e. Subdivision agreement to construct Pickett Road to suburban peripheral standards from Northfield Drive to 142nd Avenue. Doing no additional construction on the DropertV with the e×ceDtion of the installation of the curtain drain system until it has been determined by the Department of Health and Public Works that the curtain drain system works efficiently enough for each lot to function with an on-site septic system. COMMENTS: There has been considerable past case history on this pro- perty. The area is obviously extremelv wet with surface and subsurface drainage. Staff has conditioned the property with an extensive requirement to monitor the installation of the curtain draining system before any final approval is given. There also is considerable objection from adjacent property owners. jw6/mpsa22 S-6875 Proposed Vacations 14 I3 12 3 2 0 500 1000 I I I FEET BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBOIVI~IOI¢ S~S EN6TNEERS, ].nc. ~03 //I'~ Platting Officer March 25, 1983 Page 19 S-6871 1. S-6872 1. S-6874 1. 2. S-6873 1. 2. Aurora Subdivision, Block 10, [Jot 13A2 Public Works has no adverse comment. AOT East Addition, Tract A, Block 33A Resolve drainage Works Engineering. Note: Easements drain system. Public Works recommends and 2nd Avenue. Borough and drainage easements with Public must be provided for existing storm approval of vacation of Karluk Tudor Road Subdivision Public Works has no adverse comment. Public Works recommends approval Wintergreen Street. Borough Tudor Road Subdivision Public Works has no adverse comment. Public Works recommends approval of Avenue. Bavarian Heights Subdivision of vacation of vacation of 48th A subdivision agreement is required to construct interior roads to suburban interior standards. Resolve the need to construct Northfield Drive to ban access standards from the subdivision to Creek Road with Public Works Engineering. A subdivision agreement is required to construct Avenue to suburban peripheral access standards Golden View Drive to end or cul-de-sac. all subur- Rabbit 142nd from A subdivision agreement is required to construct Pickett Road to suburban periphral access standards from the south end of Lot 9, Block 3, to 142nd Avenue. Platting Officer March 25, 1983 Page 20 007 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 14. 15. S-6876 1. S-6704A 1. Resolve drainage and drainage easements with Public Works Engineering. A wetlands permit may be required on this subdivision. Resolve the need for footing drains and footing drain stub-outs with Public Works Engineering. Resolve the need for engineered foundations with Public Works Engineering. Resolve erosion and sediment control with Public Works Engineering. Remove well from right-of-way or move right-of-way out- side the well location. Resolve the need for temporary turnarounds with Public Works Engineering. Prior to filing pla~, Public Works requests a 24 month monitoring program to review the functionability of the proposed curtain drainage system. Public Works recommends denial of vacation of 30 feet ot right-of-way along the southern most boundry of the sub- division between Northfield Drive and Lupine Street. Public Works recommends approval 6f vacation of the other right-of-way as indicated. Spring Forest Subdivision Public Works has no adverse comment. Fernwood Revised The proposed subdivision layout is not adequate and re- design is recommended. The ~ollowing deficiencies must be resolved: access and drainage. If approval is given, the comments which follow should be addressed. A subdivision agreement is required to construct West 47th to urban interior/access standards from Arctic to end ok cul-de-sac. S-6868 S-6869 C-G WAREHOUSE The Traffic Engineering Division has no objection to the requested easement vacation. GOLDEN VIEW HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION S-6871 S-6872 The Traffic Engineering Division recommends denial of this requested vacation. On this, as well as previous occasions, the right-of-way to the petitioned area was barricaded. On-site inspection of the right-of-way in question could not be made. AURORA SUBDIVISION The Traffic Engineering Division has no objection to the requested variance, Section 21.80.115. ANCHORAGE ORIGINAL TOWNSITE, ]EAST ADDITION, BLOCK 33A The Traffic Engineering Division has no objection to the requested right-of-way vacations. S-6873 S-6876 and S-6874 BOROUGH TUDOR ROAD SUBDIVISION The Traffic Engineering has no objection to the partial vacation requests of right-of-way along Wintergreen Street and East 48th Avenue BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION Ail of the roadways peripheral as well as interior are local streets. The Traffic Engineering Division has no objection to the requested vacations with retention of Fernwood Street along the south boundary of tract A. Traffic Engineering Division concurs with this plat subject to providing a subdivision agreement for street name signs, and traffic control devices. SPRING FOREST SUBDIVISION West Tree Drive is a local Street. The Traffic Engineering Division has no objection to this subdivision. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: u dcip it , Anchorage MEMORANDUM March 23, 1983 Planning Department Department of Health and Environmental Protection '~~ - Bavarian Heights Subdivision OOg The Department has reviewed the soils data and the proposed engineering design of drainage network and finds the department can grant concept approval° The design of the drainage network may reduce the water table to a significant depth so lots will support septic system. However, to assure that all lots will support onsite septic systems a monitoring program will be adopted for twelve months. A monthly monitoring report must be submitted to the department by the engineering firm and substantiated by a HEP person reviewing the project° The Department prefers using perforated PVC standpipe 1" in diameter placed at.five monitoring stations in percable and nonpercable locations with two stations in the tract areas. Also, Gold Creek flow change monitoring chart be submitted before and after construction of drainage network. If monitoring proves to be successful percolation tests can then be renewed in all questionable and nonpercable tests to establish leach field end trench size. Environmental Specialist 91-010 (4/76) 99501 .?: ~ f Jo'.in: ~: CF 2ra',~Is to santy gravels. ':~a <.i !s ., } '~ '~in .: ,p,_ ~,_ syst ~::':s. NdSitJonal p.2 r,lo!e t t.Da [. ~.s ,rill 7:$ : 1} Job 1119 if you have any aubdivision, the monitor in~ .£ Jerry Weaver March 23, 1983 Page 15 ("!2 constructed transit facility. The proposed vacation appears to be located in a wetlands designated developable by the the Anchorage Wetlands Management Plan. Physical Planning does not object to the vacation for landscaping purposes, however, it is essential that wetland functions be retained to the maximum possible extent, and that pedestrian access to the Campbell Tract be maintained· Landscaping should be designed to minimize effects on the adjacent preservation wetlands. Preferably species which are visually ecologi- cally compatible with local vegetation and should be used. The site should be disturbed as little as possible, and groundcover and trees or shrubs should be established as quickly as possible. The project, if determined to be within the Wetland boundary by the Corps of Engineers, will require an individual wetland permit. BAVARIAN HEIGHTS Physical Planning has the following comments concerning the subject plat. The Hillside Wastewater Management Plan shows most of the area is unsuitable for on-site septic systems. Therefore, in addition to %he requirements for on-site systems listed on pp 29-31 of the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan (February 1982), the special require- ments for unsuitable areas listed on p 32 of that plan will apply· Portions of the property are within areas of mixed deve- lopment wetlands. These wetlands should remain as open space as illustrated on the site plans. Natural vegeta- tion should be maintained wherever possible. (Anchorage Wetlands Management Plan, and 21.85.085) To protect water quality an oil and grease separator and sediment trap should be placed at the outfall of the drainage system for this subdivision into the receiving waters. (Anchorage Wetlands Management Plan, 208 Water Quality Plan) S-6876 - SPRING FOREST The water easement through the center o]~ Lot 7-A may not leave a suitable building sits. Bill Sheffield, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and PUBLIC FACILITIES March 8, 1983 Municipality of Anchorage Pouch 6-650 Anchorage, AK 99502 ATTENTION: Jerry Weaver ~' Platting Officer Dear Mr. Weaver: RE: MOA Plats The Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT/PF) has reviewed the following plats submitted to DOT/PF for comment. We have no comment on the following plats: S6704A S6825 S6842 S6858 S6869 S6814 S6826 S6843 S6860 S6870 S6816 S6828 S6847 S6861 S6871 S6818 S6830 S6848 S6862 S6872 $6819 S6833 S6849 S6863 S6873 S6820 S6834 S6853 S6866 S6874 S6822 S6839 S6854 S6867 S6823 Thank you. S6841 S6857 S6868 S6876 Sincerely, A. Reed Gibby Regional Plan~f~g~nager Transportation Planner ARG:KS:MDM/lbk DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: &iun Anchorz je MEMORANDUM March 8, 1983 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANCHORAGE TELEPHONE UTILITY Bavarian Heights Subdivision - DEPARTMENT !.!",.R 9 i~83 COM~iUI'ilTY PLANNI~'Iq The Anchorage Telephone Ut[l|ty has checked the above described plat and recommends the Following: Ten and twenty ft. telecommunications and electrical easements required, as shown on the attached plat. ATU has no objection to the proposed vacation. RLM:LVM:m Attachment R. L. Metcalfe {// .".22'~-~ Manager- Outside P~ant Englneer~ng ANCHORAGE TELFPHONE UTILITY 9%010 (4~76) C INTI;!AL ALASKA UTILITll $ ,NC. 1301 EAST 80TH AVENUE ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99502 TELEPHONE (907) 349-6444 March 4, 1983 Planning Department Municipality of Anchora~g~ Pouch 6-650 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Gentlemen: The following is provided per your request concerning the March 1, 1982, letter reqarding "Request for Comments on Subdivision." S-68S0 thru S-6864 No Comments S-6704 & S-6968 & S-5354A No Comments S-6~6~h~pu~-6869,~..,. No Comments S-6871 thru S~-6876 No Comments Central Alaska Utilities, Inc. requests no easements at'this time. . Sincerely, CENTRAL ALASKA UTILITIES, Assistant Engineer hm INC. SERVING SUBURBAN ALASKA Page 2 . ~,' S-6798A SHACKLETON SUBD., Tract A, S-5354A BLM lots 105 & 106A C-G WAREHOUSE, (VACATIg~ ONLY) GOLDEN VIEW HEIGH-~--iVACATiO~_ONLY) AURORA SUBD., Block lb, Lot 13A-2, variance AOT EAST ADDITION, Tract A, Block 3'~, '9~ation Only BOROUGH TUDOR RD. SUBD., (~TiQ~NLY~~- BOROUGH TUDOR RD. SUBD., (~ACA-TXON_~NLY) BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBD., Blocks 1 - 3, with Vacation ~ SPRING FOREST SUBD., Block 2, Lots 7A & llA ~t/-- Variance only Sincerely, Planning Department Enclosures CMB/gb u t V,s ons March 23, 1983 Municipality of Anchorage Planning Department Pouch 6-650 Anchorage, AK 99502-0650 Dear Sir: The following PLATS were reviewed by our office and the additions and/or changes were made as indicated: S-6824 S-6825 S-6826 S-6827 S-6829 S-6830 S-6831 S-6833 S-6834 S-6835 S-6836 S-6837 S-6840 S-6842 S-6844 S-6846 S-6847 S-6848 S-6849 S-6850 S-6851 S-6852 $-6858 S-6859 S-6862 S-6863 S-6864 S-6704A S-6866 S-6867 S-6761 S-6798A S-5354A RUTH SUBD., Lots 1-10 WOODLAND PARK SUBD., Block 5, Lot llA ATHENIAN VILLAGE, Block 4, Lots lA DEBORA SUBD., Block D, Lots lA & 3A, Eagle River* GREY SUBD., Lot 3, Eagle River* SKY HARBOR ESTATES, With Vacation PARK DOWNS ESTATES SUBD., Block 1 ~ 4 HARHOR SUBD., Block 3 MCKENZIE VIEW SUBD., with Variance PINES SUBD., Lots 2A, 2B & 3A INDEPENDENCE PARK SUBD., with Vacation SPORTSMEN'S POINT SUBD., ADDN #1, Blocks 1-5 EFF - EFF. SUBD., Lots 1 - 22 FOSTER SUBD., Lot 3, Eagle River ** HILLCREST PARK SUBD., ADDN #1, Blocks 1 -3 SNEAD HEIGHTS SUBD., with Vacation, Tracts A & B, Lots 1 - 17 VAIL VILLAGE SUBD., Blocks 1 - 3 IGLOO ESTATES SUBD., ADDITION #1, Block 1 - 4 WOODLAND PARK ADDITION, Block L, Lots 7L - 9L NORTON PARK SUBD., lots 18A - 18G NORTH BIRCHWOOD SUBD., with Vacation, Birchwood* LABATE SUBD., ADDITION #1, Blocks 1 & 2 DISCOVERY POINT SUBD., Lots 1-10, Tract A WESTCENTER SUBD., Block 1, Lots 1-5 ALPINE WOODS SUBD., Blocks 2 & 6 BRUMBELOW SUBD., w~th Vacation, Block 1, Lots 2A-2F JACTON SUBD., Block 1, lots 1-14 FER~OOD SUBD., lots 1-6 (REVISED) MELINDA VIEW ESTATES SUBD., Block 1, Lots 1-8 SNOWBIRD HILL, Blocks 1-4, Eagle River** DIAMOND-WILLOW ESTATES, (REVISED) BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBD., Blocks 1 3, with Vacation SHACKLETON SUBD., Tract A, Variance only BLM lots 105 & 106A 4~2 Business Park Blvd. Anchorage, Alaska 99503 ~un~cipality of Anchorafle 0~ ~ DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM March 21, 1983 Planning Department Anchorage Water & Wastewater Utility ~ '~¢~E a v a r i a n Heights DEPARTMENT : ;:,.R 2 5 i983 COM~IUNI~ PLANNI~'!6 The Anchorage Water & Wastewater Utility the subject plat and have no objections. PEGGY CORRY Engineering Tech Anchorage Water & Wastewater Utilil:y has reviewed 91-010 (5/78) unicipality of nchora e MEMORANDUM DATE: March 23, 1983 TO: Jerry Weaver, Platting Officer, Zoning and Platting Division FROMT'~on Crenshaw, Manager, Design and De?e~pme~.~ .~i~v~,sion SUBJECT: P1 at Review The Parks and Recreation Staff has review~-~Yth'eafollowing cases and offers no comment: S-6824 S-6835 S-6847 S-6858 S~6867 S-6825 S-6836 S-6848 S-6859 S-6868 S-6826 S-6837 S-6849 S-6860 S-6869 S-6828 S-6840 S-6850 S-6861 S-6870 S-6829 S-6841 S-6851 S~6862 S-6872 S-6830 S-6842 S-6852 S-6863 S-6873 S-6831 S-6843 S-6853 S-6864 S-6874 S-6832 Johns Pk. S-6844 S-6854 S-6865 S-6833 S-6845 S-6856 S-6704A S-6834 S-6846 S-6857 S-6866 We offer con~ents on the following cases: S-6827 Debora Subdivision located in Eagle River. The Parks and Recreation Staff recommends no direct driveway access to the Old Glenn Highway to avoid existing State Bike Trail conflicts. S-6838 Abbott Park Subdivision located at the northeast corner of Lake Otis Parkway and Abbott Road. The Parks and Recreation Staff notes: - The existing Municipal Lake Otis and Abbott Road Bike Trail are adjacent to this plat and constructed within road R.O.W. The Parks and Recreation Staff recommends: - Resolution of Bike Trail access to Lake Otis and Abbott with Parks and Recreation Staff. S-6839 Mariah Subdivision located on the east boundary of Nadine Street Park. The Parks and Recreation Staff notes: - Nadine Street Park is located on the'boundary of this subdivision. - Pleasure View Subdivision, located north, was approved on February lC, 1983 to provide a lO~ walkway to Nadine Street Park at an alignment adjacent to Lot 88, Block 1 of this subdivision. 91-010 (5/781 Ntunicipality o~ Anclxorage MEMORANDUM Page 3 DATE: March 23, 1983 D~'PA~I~ff~'f OS rD: Jerry Weaver, PlanninS"~¢~t ~oninq ,;~.'~,~ 2 q .1~83 ' ,Engineer,, blL&P _ ~OM: ~c~ ~a~, Sen~[ ~;~' ~'~ ~1 Il 3~ SUBJECT: Preliminary Plats S-6704A Fernwood Subdivision No Comment S-6866 Melinda View Estates Subdivzsion No Comment S-6867 Snow Bird Hill No Comment S-6868 C-G Warehouse Nc) Comment S-6869 Golden View Heights No Comment S-6871 A~rora Subdivision :. No Comment S-6872 AOT East Addition, Tract A, Block 33A, Vacation On~ . S-6873 Borough Tudor Rd. Subdivision S-6874 Borough Tudor Rd. Subdivision Due to electrical g£ow Lh ~u Le~Lial -- requirements base{{ on l'~i~t~ ~1 e~:~al demand data, ML&P fore- vacation areas as future ~-~-o.,,~o.~on ,~nsmis- sion and distribution areas ffequired ~ha "h' ' ~ ~ ~lty; therefore, ML&P requires ...... ~P~ vaca%~on area NO C6~ent No Comment _ .~.'-'~..~ Bavarian Heights Subdivision No Con~ent S-6876 Spring Forest Subdivision No Comment S-6798A Shacleton Subdivision No Comment S-5354A BLM Lots 105 and 106A No Comment JB/csn ~Brady ~ senior ROW/Cadastral Engineer Municipal Light & Power ' 3icsko !~f~e (2~ March 8, 1982 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT S & S Engineers · 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Attention: Bill Hag~aier Sir: ORDER NO. A-70998 This is a Certificate to Plat as of March 2, 1982 at 8:00 A.'M. for a plat of the following described property: ~ARCEL NO. 1: The Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; and the South- east 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 35, Township 12 North, Range 3 West, Seward Meridian, filed in the Anchorage Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska. The Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Section 35, Township 12 North, Range 3 West, Seward Meridian, filed in the Anchorage Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska. This Agency certifies that record title is vested in REXFORD L. TUP~ER, individually and as executive trus~tee of Bridget Enterprises, an estate i~ fee simple. Free from all liens, encumbrances and objections, EXCEPT as follows: 1. Taxes and assessments, if any, due the taxing authority indicated~ Taxing Authority: Municipality of Anchorage. 2. Easement for electric transmission or distribution line or system and/or telephone lines across said premises, together with the right · to enter said premises to make repairs and the right to cut shrubbery and trees which constitute a menace to said lines and/or systems located on said premises. Recorded : January 20, 1952. Volume/Page : 84/294. Granted to : Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Affects : General easement - no definite location disclosed. 3. Reservation of a 20 foot strip around the perimeter for road and other public uses, as contained in deed recorded June 1, 1957 in Book 147 at Page 117. (Affects Parcel NO. 2) Southerly boundaries and a 20 f~ot rightSof-way around the balance of the perimeter Of said tract of land for highway and other public purposes, as contained in deed recorded May 17, 1961 in Book 222 at Page 120~ (Affects Parcel No..1). 5. Deed of trust to. secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated and any other amounts payable under the terms thereof. Dated Recorded Volume/Page Trustor 5eneficiary A~d re-recorded February 17, 1981. February 19, 1981. 570/146. Rexford L. Turner, individuallv and as Executive Trustee of Bridget EnterDr£ses~ Alaska Title Guaranty Company. Wayne Schwabrow and ~renda Schwabrow. $ 6 i' ?' -- Page 2 A-70998 EXCEPTION NO. 5 - CONTINUED: On : May 20, 1981. volume/Page : 763. ,This report is restricted to the use of the addressee and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. 5lability of the Agency is limited %0 the compensation received therefor. ALASKA TITLE GU~,.;NTY AGENCY, INC. JAG:bt continued.. · BAVARIAN HE!IGHTS SUBDIVi.$10N S & ENGINEERS, INC. S · 7125 OLD SEWARD HIGHWAY * ANCHORAGE ALASKA 99502 February 23, 1983 0 P- Municipality of Anchorage 632 Wo 6th Avenue Anchoprage, Alaska 99501 Attn: Chairman~ Platting Board RE: Application for approval Bavarian Heights Subdivision Dear Mr. Chairman: On behalf of our client, Bridger Enterprises, S & S Engineers, Inc. is pleased to submit our request for ap- proval of a res~dentla cluster development Our project encompasses a 50 acre site located on Nor thwood Drive approximately 1,200 feet north of Mile 3 on Rabbit Creek Road o We feel that the cluster development and our proposal in particular is appropriate for the site. The existing soils on this site preclude development on this land under existing R-6 zoning. This cluster development incorporates a comprehensive distribution system for all utility services except sewage. An overall land use plan also has delineated open space in addition to residential lots. Our description narrative follows. We feel this project is appropriate for the site and in keeping with the community' s developing character. We ask you for your support. Sincerely, William C. Hagmaier Project Engineer WCH:dd EAGLE RIVER ANCHORAGE HOMER (~694-9848 (~349-6~1 (~235~179 TR 2 190 $ 14 13 12 . rR 3 7 AREA MAP BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT A. SITE DESCRIPTION: This site is located in the Hillside area north of Rabbit Creek Road and west of Prator Street. The area en- closed by this development contains 50 acres. The topo- graphy in the eastern half of the development has an average slope of approximately 13%. Vegetation in this area is com- posed of black spruce, white spruce and cottonwood trees with isolated stands of birch and alders. The south central half of the property has a slight slope of 2% to the west, with vegetation restricted to sedges and marsh grass with in- termittent stands of black spruce and birch trees. This portion of the site. is noticeably affected by a surficially saturated peat condition. The northern half of the site varies topographically from a negative 13% grade on the east side of the property westerly to a saturated peat bog locat- ed in the north central portion of the site° The northwest corner of the site is typified by a 20' knoll with side slopes approximating 14%. The property is zoned R-6 as is all the surrounding pro- perty adjacent to this subdivision° Access to and from the property is excellent and will be via Northfield Drive to Rabbit Creek Road. The property is owned and will be developed by Bridget Enterprises of Eagle River. B. PLANNING OBJECTIVES: The petition area is currently zoned R-6, suburban resi- dential district (large lot). The R-6 district is designed to encourage residential development while at the same time preserving and enhancing those physical and environmental features which add to the desirability of suburban living. As the site is presently zoned, the minimum lot size is 1 1/4 acres. Due to soil conditions (predominantly clay and hardpan silt) the present zoning allows little flexibility in lot layout and in siting the dwelling units. The primary planning objective of the proposed cluster development is to provide single family residential dwelling units with minimum environmental disturbance. The existing soils on this property preclude standard R-6 residential development because of their impervious nature in terms of septic waste disposal. It is this feature that has dictated our planning objectives as follows: a) retain a ~ignificant portion of the site in its natural state. b) provide quality housing to the public at the most affordable cost. c) minimize aesthetic disturbance to adjacent areas by providing screening easements and greenbelt areas. These objectives cannot be met under the current R-6 zoning. Approximately half of the 50 acres is totally unsuitable for a typical R-6 lot with both on site waste disposal system and water well. Because the existing soils totally preclude development: under this zoning, a community ~ter system is required to serve any development on this tract of land. The economics of constructing a community water distribution network and corresponding pumphouses dictates the fact that the density must be maintained at the R--6 level with the homes clustered within the area of suitable soils° The plan that has been submitted for this subdivision has taken into account all technical, economic and aesthetic considerations, as listed above in our planning objectives. The optimum solution to the constraints upon this property is a clustered community of open space and residential homes with a community water and on-site septic system. We are therefore requesting a density of 0.8 dwelling units per acre in order to meet the planning objectives that we have outlined above. C. PROJEC~ DESCRIPTION: The project will consist of 40 single family dwellings with an average lot size of 23,000 sq. ft. Each home will have its own private yard[ and quick access to the open space area. In addition, an internal greenbelt along all roads within the subdivision will be maintained by use of setbacks. This will decrease the visual clustering of the project and provide a more private identity to each of the individual residences. The final aspect of this PUD is the retention of undisturbed open space at the north central and southerly areas within the property% F_28 The construction of individual residences will be gover- ned by the architectual control committee and by the coven- ants, conditions, and restrictions for Bavarian Heights° The covenants, conditions and restrictions for this subdivis- ion are attached with this report. D. OPEN SPACE: The tract of land that currently exists off Rabbit Creek Road lies in a a relatively undisturbed and natural state. It is the petitioner's intent to leave the land in its natural state as much as possible. With the exception of roads and residential home sites, the site will be left in its natural state. Incorporated within the covenants will be provisions to restrict the amount of land that can be cleared for home construction. There will be two types of open space provided in Bavarian Heights Subdivision. The first type will be held in private ownership by the owners of Lots 1-40. The private open space will be approximately 19,500 Sqo ft. per lot which excludes the main structure, driveways and parking aprons. The second type of open space is undisturbed native vegetation which is held in common by the Homeowners Association. This open space is intended to preserve the natural surroundings while, at the same time, serving as a buffer to the adjacent areas. These areas are shown as Tract A, B, and C. Total acreage of the undisturbed open space is 21.65 acres. 029 E. LANDSCAPING: The natural vegetation on the site consists of four major plant associations: mixed white spruce/deciduous forest~ black spruce forest, scattered birch and alder, and a shrubby wet bog area. Following the drainage pattern, the white spruce/ deciduous forest is found along the eastern ridge of the property. Acting as a natural and visual buffer between the Baw~rian Heights Subdivision and adjacent ].and owners, a 25-ft. building setback has been established to retain its character. A very nice stand of mature black spruce is found along the southwest property line. The shrubby wet bog is found at the north central property line and has been left in its natural state. By allowing for ~xistlng drainage patterns and · ' · · establishing a proper development buffer around it, the integrity of the bog will be maintained. Like most of Alaska's natural enw[ronment, the existing vegetation is sensitive to development. To minimize impact on the landscape, ali. manmade cuts will be as minimal as possible and will be seeded and restored to a natural state. In addition to preserving the existing vegetation found on the site, an accent planting area has been provided at the entrance to the subdivision. This landscaped area, with a 6~ft. wood frame, earth mounding and identification sign, sets the mood for the subdivision along with providing separation from existing houses. Plants, selected for their color and ornamental characteristics, will include crabapple, mountain ash, mayday, birch, juniper, roses, lilac, honeysuckle, and cottoneaster. It is the intent of Bavarian Heights Subdivision to convey a natural park-like atmosphere through proper land use. This will be accomplished by minimizing impact on the existing natural environment, incorporation of development setbacks and maintenance of buffer vegetation. F. PUBLIC UTILITIES: Ail utilities for this cluster development will be installed by the developer (with the exception of on-site septic systems). The water system serving this subdivision wilt be a community system consisting of three to four wells, a pump house and a distribution system which will meet municipal and state D.E.C. criteria. The water rights for this property have been permitted by the Department of Natural Resources in the amount of 31,500 gallons per day. The Homeowners Association will be responsible to sign a contract with a licensed laboratory for the monthly samplings of the water system. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions for Bavarian Heights Subdivision provide for a monthly assessment to be levied on each homeowner for maintenance of the community facilities as may be necessary. This monthly assessment will be utilized to pay for all road maintenance that may be necessary, monthly sampling of the water system, maintenance on the water distributioa systems, and main- tenance on all open areas that are held in common by the homeowners of Bavarian Heights Subdivision~ These monthly assessments will be put into an escrow account and will require two signatures for dispursement of any funds. This method should insure that sufficient monies are available at such time as any major expenses would occur. Electrical service to this subdivision will be provided by C.E.A., gas service by Alaska Gas, and telephone service by A.T.U. G. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND VEHICLE CIRCULATION: Access to this subdivision will be from Rabbit Creek Road via Northfield Drive. Internal circulation will be attained by traffic flow on Northfield Drive which will also serve as the main residential thoroughfares. It is the petitioners intent to upgrade Northfield Drive to a strip paved road from Rabbit Creek Road to this subdivision. In addition, all internal, roads will be strip paved with drainage control. Based on current estimates of driving habits, the proposed ~0 lots would generate 320 vehicle trips per day on Northfield. The capacity of Northfield Drive when improved by the petitioner will more than handle the increased traffic flow. No on-street parking will be allowed on any streets. The front yard setbacks for the R-6 zone haw~ been maintained and thus all parking will be restricted to driveways only. H. SITE DRAINAGE: Site drainage will be accomplished by use of roadside ditching and subdrainage throughout the property. Each road prism will incorporate a subdrain to receive any and all groundwater. In addition all roadside drainage that infiltrates into the adjacent road prism will also be disposed of through the subdrainage system. The outfall for the drainage system will be via drainage easement to the headwaters of Gold Creek. Ail downstream drainage culverts have been examined and have been rated as more than sufficient to pass this minimal addition to the present flow. It has been estimated by drainage modeling that the quantity of water resulting from this subdivision is 1,07 cfs. The current flow of water in this drainage ditch/creek is approximately 2.-3 cfs., most of which presently originates from this property as a groundwater source. ]DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: It is the petitioner's intent to complete the develop- ment of the roads, water system, and other utilities during the 1983 construction season. Additionally any landscaping will be completed during 1983 if possible. If the landscaping cannot be completed before August 15, 1983, this work will be delayed until the 1984 season. Paving will not be performed until the 1984 construction season in order to allow for any secondary consolidation of the roadway during the first year. Development and construction on the individual .lots will be by the private lot owner and will occur over the next three (3) years (estimated). C'32 J. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: During the development of the project careful consideration will be given to air quality and noise impact in order to minimize the interim disturbance during construction. All equipment will be suitably muffled and the access road into the project, Northfield Drive, will be treated with CSS-1 to minimize any dust. K. OWNERSHIP: Lots 1 through 40 will be offered for sale to the public. Ownership of the individual lots will transfer to the private owner. Tract A, B and C will be held in common ownership by the new Bavarian Heights Home Owners Association for use by its members and their guests. L.. CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT STRUCTURE: Attached with this application is a preliminary copy of the Protective Covenants and the Home Owners Association Agreement for the proposed subdivision. As described in the covenants, a home owners association will be formed. The purpose of the association will be to maintain the common areas and to carry out the intent of the covenants. The association may adopt bylaws and elect officers to conduct its affairs, make improvements to the subdivision, bring legal action to enforce the covenants and other type of lawful actions. The agreement also provides for common us- age of Tract A, B,and C, by all residents of Bavarian Heights Subdivision. M. PARKING: There will be no roadside parking allowed. Ail lots will have adequate driveways and parking areas to preclude any roadside parking. (All road within the subdivision will be signed with "No Parking" signs.) N. TRASH DISPOSAL: Roadside trash disposal service will be provided to the project area by Anchorage Refuse on a weekly basis as is provided to similar projects throughout Anchorage. O. MAIL SERVICE: Mail delivery boxes will be placed at roadside locations by the builders of each respective lot with the Post Office providing delivery service. DRAWT PROTECTIVE CONENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONSt HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION PART A. PREAMBLE. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that whereas the undersigned is the sole owner of properties comprising BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, and WHEREAS, the undersigned, desires to assure the continued development of BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, on a high level for the benefit of the future property owners and, for protection of property values therein, does desire to place on and against certain real property within BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION certain protective covenants regarding the improvements and/or use of the same; NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned does hereby establish and file for record the following declarations, reservations, protective covenants, limitations, conditions and restrictions regarding the use and/or improvements of the property located in BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, and located in the Anchorage Hecording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska, filed as Plat No. , of said records which said plat makes reference to these convenants. PART B. AREA OF APPLICATION B-1. FULLY ~ROTECTED HESID~NTIAL/RECREATIONAL AREA. The covenants in Part C in their entirety shall apply to lots of BAVARIAN H~IGHTS SUBDIVISION. all Lots shall mean and refer shown upon any recorded plat or HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION. to any numbered plot of land subdivision map of BAVARIAN B-2. EFFECTIV~ DATE. The restricted covenants, limitations and conditions hereinafter set forth and applicable to the residential area hereinabove describeo shall take effect concurrently with, and not until, the recording of the plat for BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, consisting of 75 lots, as more particularly described in the preamble hereto. Any lawful but nonconforming use of any lot existing'as of the date hereof shall be permitted to continue, provided that after such time as such use ceases, no such unconforming use shall be permitted thereafter to be reinstituted. PART C. RESIDENTIAL AREA CONVENANTS C-la. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES. No lot shall be used except for residential purposes. No building shall be erected, placed, altered or permitted to remain on any lot other than one detached single family dwelling and a private garage for not more than thTee cars. Temporary or surplus buildings may not be placed on any lot: to be used as a utility shed unless its appearance is equal to the home's standard, utilizing proper foundation and siding. C-lb. MOBILE HOMES. No mobile homes or travel trailers shall be utitlized for residential purposes within the subdivision. Travel trailers may, however, be stored while not in actual recreational usage upon the property belonging to any person or persons who may subsequently acquire property in the subdivision.. C-2. UTILITIES. No domestic water wells shall be constructed upon any lots in the subject subdivision nor shall any private sewage disposal system be allowed upon any lot contained within the subdivision. C-3. DWELLING COST, QUALITY AND SIZE. No single family dwelling shall be permitted on any lot which has an appraisal value of less than $75,000.00, based upon 1982 costs, exclusive of t~e lot. The square footage of any dwelling building shall not be less than 800 square feet per level in the event that there is more than one level to the subject structure and in the event that there is no .more than one level to the subject structure, a minimum of 1,000 square feet shall be required for a structure, excluding open porches, carports and garage. Construction of all houses shall be at least equalto the present F.H.A. minimum building standards. The appraised figures are based upon cost levels pertaining on the date of these covenants being recorded, it being the intention and purpose of the convenant to assure that all dwellings shall be of a quality of workmanship and materials substantially the same or better than that which can be produced on the date these covenants are recorded at the minimum cost stated herein. 037 C-4. CONSTRUCTION COMPLETETION REQUIREMENT. Ail main dwellings must have a finished exterior within six (6) months. from th~ start of construction and be full~ completed within one (1) year from the start of construction. All out buildings must be fully completed in six (6) months time. C-5. BUILDING LOCATION. be as follows: Setbacks for all lots will FRONT BACK SIDE Lots 1-9, 11-40 50 25 15 Lot 10 25 15 50 C-6. TREES. No owner shall be permitted to completely clear a lot on which standing trees of size and beauty exist. Space may be cleared to provide for construction and trees may be thinned so long as the maximum natural beauty and aethetic value of the trees is retained. C-7. FENCES AND SIGHT DISTANCES AT INTERSECTIONS. No fence of any kind may be installed in violation of any State statutes or Municipal ordinances presently enacted or as may be hereafter amended. C-8. UTILITIES AND BASEMENTS. The platted utility easements shown on this plat shall be used for utility purposes, power lines and telephone lines and utility employees shall have the right of access to same. This restriction shall be deemed a permanent easement for that purpose. The grantor specifically reserves the same as a utility easement, and no fence or other permanent or semi-permanent structure shall be erected on or within the area reserved. The easments and rights granted, or to be granted the utility companies, providing said services include the continuing right to prevent future act of any person on or in said described land; and for this purpose the said utility companies shall have the right to remove any trees planted or transplanted or structures erected or created subsequent =o the date hereof, which infringe upon or extend into the reserved area/ together wi~h the right of ingress and egress from and passage on and over said land for the purpose of effecting and maintaining such utility service, but reserving to the individual lot owners such use, rights, and privileges in said land as may be exercised and enjoyed withou~ interference with or abridgement of the rights granted said utility companies. The costs of removal of any encroachment proscribed herein and any legal proceedings related thereto shall be born by the party creating such encroachment except that the costs of removing any natually occuring vegetation shall be the responsibility of the utility company desiring such removal. C-9. SIGNS. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one sign of not more than five (5) square feet advertising the property for sale or rent, or signs used by the builder to advertise property during construction and sales period. C-10. NUISANCgS. No noxibus or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any lot, nor shall anything done thereon which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. No trade or business of an offensive nature shall be permitted upon any residential lot. C-1io LIVESTOCK. No animals or livestock of any kind shall be raised , bred or kept On any lot; except ~t]at dogs, cats or o~her normal household pets may be kept, provided that =hey are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose. Ail doge shall be restrained, as necessary, to prevent their becoming nuisances. C-12. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES. No structure of a temporary nature, tent,shack or quonset hut or barn shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence. No trailer homes other than those used for camping purposes may be parked on any lot and they may not be used as a dwelling or home. C-13. GARBAGE DISPOSAL. No trash cans, garbage cans, trash barrels, boxes or other refuse containers shall be placed or maintained on or along the side or end of any lot fronting upon, or adjacent to, a streett with the exception that patrons of a garbage pickup service may place such containers bearing trash or garbage for pickup upon the end or side of the lot fronting upon the street on which the garbage is picked up on the day designated by ordinance, resolution or contract for the pickup of garbage at such lot. No burning of trash, garbage, refuse or other waste shall be permitted upon the street front and/or side of any lot at any time, and such burning on the rear of lots shall De permitted only in accordance with the appropriate health and safety laws or ordinances or the Municipality of Anchorage. C-14. INOPERABLE VEHICLES. No inoperable vehicle shall be parked or maintined upon any lot or within any street, alley or easement adjacent to any lot in the aforedescribed subdivision. A vehicle temporarity inoperative for repair by the owner or under the owner's direction for a period not exceed thirty (30) days (subject to availability of parts) shall not be considered a violation of this provision. C-15. SNOWMOBILES. Snowmobiles shall not be operated on the streets or utility easements of this subdivision except for ingress or egress to the nearest open space or to the nearest areas not disapproved for snowmobile operation. NO snowmobile operations shall Oe conducted between the hours of 10:00 o'clock P.M. and 7:00 o'clock A.M. C-16. TERM. These covenants are to run with the land and shall De binding on all parties and all persons claiming under ti~em for a period of 25 years from the date these covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of 10 years unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then owners of the lots has ~een recorded agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part. A majority of the lot owners in the subdivision can make addition, deletions or amendments to the covenants. ¢'30 C-17. ENFORCEMENT. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against: any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant, either to restrain violation or to ~ecover damages. C-18. SEVERAB,ILITY. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. PART D. HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION D-1. MANDATORY MEMBERSHIP. A Homeowner's Association is being established to provide for the water systems, sewage disposal systems, maintenance and repair of public roads, maintenance of recreational area, drainage, street lights, and street signs serving the properties until a government body assumes those responsibilities, and to provide rules of operation and control of the subdivision. Every purchaser, his heirs, assigns and successors in the ownership of lots in this subdivision agrees as a condition of purchase that he is automatically a member of the Homeowner's Association. He will abide by the policies now set and as later may be amended by majority decision. He will support such policies and will pay such assessments as may from time to time be levied. The Homeowner's Association will be operated by the sudivider until such time as more than 50 percent of the lots subject to Association 3urisdiction have been conveyed to the ultimate consumers (contractors and other purchasing any of said lots for resale shall not be deemed to be "ultimate consumers"), or October 31, 1985, whichever first occurs, at which time the Association will be activated aad there will be an election of officers and Executive Committee and dues will be established and levied as determined ~y the ~xecutive Committee. D-2. VOTING RIGH'~S. The Association shall have one class of voting rights. Each owner of a lot, whether suc[% owner is an intity, person, or more than one person, shall be entitled to one (1) and only one vote for each lot owned. When more than one person holds an interest in any lot, such persons shall decide among themselves how the~vote for such lots shall be exercised. Eligible votes may De cast on all matters t~at may come before a meeting of the Association. 04i D-3. CREATION OF THE LIEN AND PERSONAL OBLIGATION OF ASSESSMENTS. The lot owners for each lot owned within the subdivision hereby covenant, and each owner of any lot by acceptance of a deed therefor, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, is deemed to covenant and agree to pay the A~sociation: (1) Annual assessments or charges, and (2) Special assessments for capital improvements, such assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter provided. D-4. CONVEYANCE AND SUBORDINATION. The Association shall have the power to assess fees to the lot owners to achieve the objectives'of the Homeowner's Association. The lien of the assessments provided for herein shall be subordinate to the lien of any mortgage. Sale or transfer of any lot shall not affect the assessment lien. However, the sale or transfer of any lot pursuant to mortgage foreclosure, or any proceeding in liey thereof, shall extinguish the lien of such assessments as to payments which become due prior to such sale or transfer. No sale or transfer shall relieve such lot from liability for any assessments thereafter becoming due or from the lien thereof. D-5. ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS. The Association will be operated by the subdivider until such time as more than 50% of the lots subject to Association jurisdiction have been conveyed to the ultimate consumers (contractors and others purchasing any of said lots for resale shall not De deemed to be "ultimate consumers") , or October 31, 1985, whichever first occurs. Tl~e fiscal year for assessments shall be from November 1st through October 31st. Upon purchase of a lot or lots by a purchaser, the purchaser shall, at the time of closing, pay the pro rata annual assessment remaining for the fiscal year's assessment plus one full annual assessment fee of $ which will cause purchaser's annual assessment to be paid through October 31st of the year subsequent to purchase. The subdivider will not pay any assessments for unsold lots but will make up any deficits in the maintenance expense until such time as all lots in the subdivision have been sold. At such time as the Homeowner's Association is activated, the soard of Directors may fix the annual assessments. O42. D-6. EMERGENCY PROVISION. The Board of Directors may fix an Emergency Assessment, not in excess of per lot, by 'a two-thirds vote of the entire membership of the Board. The Board of Directors shall have sole discretion as to what constitutes an emergency so long as such discreation is exercised justly and reasonably. Such assessment shall only be fixed at a duly constituted meeting of the Board, when~ a. Conditions do not allow time for a special or regular meeting of the Association membership to be called, and b. An emergency exists which requires immediate &ction (endangers life, property, or use of the properties), and c. The Association's funds are not adequate to pay to cost of action to be taken. D-7. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. In addition to the Annual and Emergency Assessments authorized above, the Association may levy, in any assessment year, a Special Assessment applicable to that year only, for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction, reconstruction, repair, or replacement .of a Capital Improvement or upon public roads, including rights-of-way, serving the subdivision, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, PROVIDED THAT any such assessment shall have the assent to two-thirds of the lot votes represented at a meeting duly called for this purpose. D.-8. NOTICE REQdlREMENTS. written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking action authorized under Sections D-5 through D-7 shall be sent to all memDers not less than fifteen (15) days nor more than thirty (30( days in advance of the meeting. At the first such meeting called, the presence of members or of proxies entitled to cast sixty percent (60~) of all votes shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be called subject to the sa~e notice requirements and the required quorum at the subsequent meeting shall be one-half of the required quorum at the preceeding meeting. No such subsequent meeting shall be held for more than sixty (60 days following the preceding meeting. 04u D-9. UNIFORM RATE OF ASSESSMENT. Both Annual and Special Assessments must be fixed at a uniform rate for lots and may be collected on a monthly, semi-annual, or annual basis by the subdivider or the Association. all D-10. DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, DUE DATES. The first Annual Assessment shall be'paid as set forth in paragraph D-5 above. The Board of Directors shall. fix the amount of the Annual Assessment against each lot at least thirty (30) days in advance of each Annual Assessment period. Written notice of the Annual Assessment shall be sent to every owner subject thereto. November 1 shall be the date Annual Assessment are due and payable. The Association shall upon demand, and for a reasonable charge, furnish a certificate signed by an Office of the Association setting forth whether the assessments on a specified lot have been paid. D-il. EFFECT OF NONPAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS: REMEDIES OF THE ASSOCIATION. Any assessment not paid within thirty (30) days after the due date shall bear interest from the due date at the rate established by the Board of Directors. The Association may bring an action, at law, against the owner personally obligated to pay the same, or foreclose the lien against the property. No owner may waive or otherwise escape liability of the assessments provided herein by non-use of the Common Area or abandonment of his lot. D-12. TERMINATION OF ASSOCIATION. The Association shall be terminated upon the condition of a governmental agency causing to be created a Public Service District which will provide for the maintenance and repair of streets located within the subdivision. DATED this day of , 1982. By. Its STATE OF ALASKA ) ) SS. THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on the d-%y of . , 1982, before me, the un--d, a Notary Public fo~-the Stats of Alaska, duly commissiened and sworn, personnally appeared . _, to me known and known to me to be the identical individual described in and who executed the within :~nd foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as the free and voluntary act and deed of , for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN U~]DER MY HAND and official seal the day and year last above written. 044 Notary Public in and for Alaska ~y commission expires: February 21, S & ENGINEERS, INC. $ 7125 OLD SEWARD HIGHWAY ' ANCI'IORAGE,.ALASKA 99502 1983 046 Jerry Weaver Platting Officer Municipality of Anchorage Pouch 6-650 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Dear Mr. Weaver: The following narrative is a drainage and hydrology analysis for Bavarian Hts. Subdivision. This letter is in- tended to quantify and qualify the existence of surface drainage, groundwater, wetlands, and to some extent the com- munity water supply for this subdivision. The 50 acres proposed for development is vegetated with a variety of native grasses and trees including alders, birch, black spruce and white spruce. The topography for the area shows a hill along the east boundary for this prop- erty and a predominant knoll located in the northwest corner of the property. The precipitation equivalent for both rain and snowfall in this area is approximately 15--20 inches per year depending upon the year. The precipitation falling within the area of the subdivision and the adjacent sub- divisions flows in a westerly manner across Bavarian Heights Subdivision. This westerly flow of water across the surface of this 50-acre tract eventually finds its way to the headwaters of Gold Creek, located approximately 1200 feet west of Bavarian Heights Subdivision. The drainage basin for this area encompasses the 50 acres of the proposed Bavarian Heights Subdivision and an additional 20-30 acres east of Bavarian Heights Subdivision. The runoff from the property to the east is minimized due to the existence of a perenially flowing stream approximately 800 feet east/northeast of this subdivision which intercepts the surface water runoff from the upper hillside and channels it into Rabbit Creek. The amount of drainage originating from this fifty acres will not be changed by the addition of this subdivision. The only thing that will be changed will be the length of time for the drainage to reach Gold Creek. Pzesently this flow reaches the creek by overland flow, whereas within the proposed subdivision it will reach the creek through a series of storm drains, grassed swales and drainage ditches. EAGLE RIVER ANCHORAGE HOMER (~h694-98~ (~9,5~1 (~235~179 Page 2 S & S Engineers, Inc. Bavarian Hts. Drainage; February 21, 1983 ~1119 It is estimated that this subdivision will result in approximately 5.48 acres of impervious area. (2.73 acres of road area, 1.83 acres of homes, and 0.92 acres of driveways and other impervious areas). The drainage resulting from this additional impervious area will be channeled to the grassed swales adjacent to the roadways, in accordance with the road standards of Public Works Engineering° Engineering calculations presently put the total amount of surface runoff from this drainage basin to Gold Creek at approximately 11.20 cubic feet per second. The addition of the 5°48 acres of impervious area would change the resultant creek hydrograph in that an additional 1.07 cubic feet per second of runoff would reach the creek sooner vim the grassed swales and storm drainage system. The proposed subdivision partially lies within a stand- ing water area described on page 16 of the Hydrologic Study of the Hillside Area~ prepared for the Borough, by the U.S. Geological Survey in 1975. However, as stated on page 17 of this study, "field inspection is invaluable in evaluating any potential surficial drainage problem." The study goes on further in stating that "the peat material on the surface can act as a sponge in that it may be saturated one or two feet beneath the surface. The material below the peat, however, may not be saturated. If wet muskeg is removed and adequate surface drainage provided, these lands may be made suitable for development". This is the very condition that exists within this subdivision, as can be seen by the soil profiles included with the packet. Approximately half of this property is overlain by one to three feet of saturated peat with a very dense glacial till located just beneath the peat. The surface drainage provided by the roadway system and the underground storm drain system will definitely intercept the surface water presently saturating this peat. On page 28 of this same study, this area has been mapped out as being highly susceptible to surface and ground water pollution. The map of that area on page 28 coincides identically with the map on page 16. This designation of high susceptibility exists because it assumes that any conventional septic system installed in this area would discharge into a heavily saturated and permeable ground. Page 3 S & S Engineers, Inc. Bavarian Heights Sub. February 21, 1983 ~1119 However, field investigation on this sit~ has revealed that it is only the surficial area of peat that is saturated. An engineered drainage plan for this subdivision will result in the "drying out~ of this surficially saturated muskeg. This proposed subdivision lies partially within Wet- lands Management Plan, Area #30; however, this area has been classified as acceptable for mixed development. In addition, a Nationwide Wetlands Permit was issued by the Corps of Engineers on August 19, 1981. The area of principal concern to the Corps was the north-central portion of this property which has been tracted out and will be left in its natural state. The co~nunity water supply system has three wells, a ceatral pumping house and the distribution system of pipes. The three wells currently have a combined[ pumping capacity of 133 gallons per minute. The primary well is an artesian well rated at 88 gallons per minute, located in the southwest corner of the subdivision. The second well rated at 37.5 gallons per minute, is located at the entrance of the subdivision, adjacent to Northfield Drive. The third well, rated at 7.5 gallons per' minute, is located midway between the first and second wells and approximately 150 feet north of the south property line. Ali. three wells are located approximately 500-900 feet away from any private well. All three wells vary in depth from 140' to as deep as 210 feet. The effect of the proposed community well system upon the aquaifers currently serving residents along both the Prator and Mercedes Hill areas has been evaluated by the Dept. of Natural Resources under the ~ter rights permitting processes and this department has granted water rights of 31,500 gallons per day for this subdiw[sion. O40 Page 4 S & S Engineers, Inc. Bavarian Heights Sub. February 21, 1983 Job ~1119 The community water system as proposed is of sufficient capacity to service the proposed subdivision and has sufficient horizontal and vertical separation from any on-site wastewater disposal system. In addition, all the requirements of all responsible agencies governing the water systems have been complied with. The information contained in the above narrative is the result of numerous site investigations, engineering anal- ysis, and research. If there is any additional information your department requires concerning the drainage or hydrol- ogy of this proposed subdivision, please fsel free to call us at 349-6561. Very truly yours, /'John E. Swanson, P.E. William C.~agm~r Engineer JES:WCH:dd February 22, S & ENGINEERS,, INC,, 7125 OLD SEWARD HIGHWAY · ANCHORAGE, ALASKA g9502 1983 05O Jerry Weaver~ Platting Officer Municipality of Anchorage Pouch 6-650 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Re: Bavarian Heights Subdivision Drainage Plan Dear Mr. Weaver: The following narrative is a discussion on the drainage plan proposed for Bavarian Heights Subdivision. This drainage plan has been engineered so as to lower the water table in the areas susceptible to ground water contamination from on-site septic tanks. The drainage system proposed for this development is shown as a blueline drawing attached to the subdivision plat. The drainage system will be composed of both fin drains and CMP storm drainage. Both types of proposed drainage are shown on the attached drainage plan. The fin drains will be utilized to intercept the high ground water and lower the groundwater elevation by re-directing the drainage through the subdivision The drainage system will then discharge this water to the headwaters of Gold Creek, which is where the present groundwater ultimately ends up. The drainage system as proposed has not increased the amount of drainage to Gold Creek. The purpose of the drainage system is only to permanantly de-water and lower the existing ground water to an elevation acceptable to Dept. of Environmental Protection so that on-site septic systems will function properly, and not contaminate the existing ground water. The fin drain system consists of sections of a flexible vertical fin made of deeply dimpled high strength styrene sheet enveloped in a non-woven polypropelene filter fabric. Perforated plastic pipe is inserted into each unit and connected, forming a continuous drainage curtain. Each section of pipe has a flap of fabric that overlaps the adjacent section, preventing any movement of soil into the system. The vertical fin provides channels on both sides, permitting water to flow vertically to the perforated pipe at the base of the fin. EAGLE RIVER ANCHORAGE HOMER (907) 694-9846 {9~7) 349-6561 (907) 235-8179 Page 2 S & S Engineers, Inc. Bavarian ~eights Drainage February 22, 1983 System; Job 1119 Upon entering the perforated plastic pipe, the water is then conveyed to the drainage system as shown on the attached drawings. As can be seen from the attached drawings, the fin drains will be utilized to lower the groundwater table by installing these systems upstream of the affected areas. Thusv the fin drain system and connecting storm drainage will act as both a groundwater barrier and drainage conveyance system. The drainage plan as proposed~ was engineered so as to mitigate any impact on the area of standing water in the north-central portion of this subdivision. At the present time, as can be seen from the test hole logs and soil profiles accompanying this report, the water from this bog flows toward the headwaters of Gold Creek through a series of sand and sandy gravel deposits, running in a south-westerly direction across this property. The table below shows the engineering coefficients of permeability for the soils through which the water presently runs in comparison with the permeability coefficient for. the fin drain. As can be seen from the table, the permeability coefficients are relatively equal. The permeability of the filter fabric is in fact less than some of the existing soils° Thus, the installation of this fin drain and storm drainage plan will not have any detrimental effect on the bog in terms of lowering the water table. FILTER MEDIA COEFFICIENT OF PERMEA BILITY (PT/SEC.) Clean Gravel (GW) .16 - .32 Coarse sandy gravel (GP/SM), (SW), (SP) .013 - .10 Medium Sand (SP/SM), (SW/SM) .0016 - .005 Filter fabric for fin drain .1 Page 3 S & S Engineers, Inc. Bavarian Heights Drainage System; Job ].119 February 22, 1983 The drainage system as proposed will lower the ground water table in the affected area without disturbing any of the adjacent areas. The drainage system as proposed will lower the groundwater table a minimum of 4' below soils acceptable for on-site septic systems, in conformance with the requirements of 'the Dept. of Health and Environmental Protection. There is adequate slope across the property and to Gold Creek to convey this water without any engineering constraints. The system as proposed provides for an economical and environmentally safe development, as well as insuring that there will be no detrimental effect upon any of the adjacent lands. I hope the foregoing discussion will help alay your fears as to the intentions for drainage and on-site septic system installations within this subdivision. ~f you have any questions regarding the proposed engineering design, the specifications, engineering analysis or construction details, please feel free to call me at 694-9846° Sincerely, William C. ~agmaier Engineer WCH:dd & ENGINEERS, lNG. 7125 OLD SEWARD HIGHWAY" ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99502 February 18, 1983 054 Mr. Rexford Turner P.O. Box 589 Eagle River, Alaska 99577 RE: Preliminary soils exploration and percolation tests for Bavarian Heights Subdivision. Dear Mr. Turner: The information contained in this report is the result of our preliminary soils investigation on the Bavarian Heights Subdivision, upper Rabbit Creek Road area. Our investigation included the review of previous soils investigations, research of soils data on surrounding property, and field examination with backhoe test pits. Forty-four test pits were excavated and examined during October and November of ].981. The test pits were logged and representative samples were taken. These varied in depths from 12 to 21 feet and were spaced throughout the proposed subdivision area. Prior to this report, eight perc tests were performed by Moening, Gray, and Associates during July of 1979, eight test pits were excavated and examined during September of 1978 by Moening, Gray and Associates, and feur test pits were logged by John M. Lambe during December of 1977. The test pit locations for all projects are shown on Figure 1. In all cases, subsurface examination was accomplished with backhoe equipment. Surface drainage throughout the area is in a westerly direction except for the north central area of the property where a southerly trending swale occurs between the east ridge and a small hill to the west. Drainage is excellent along the easterly ridge and small hill. Drainage in the afore-mentioned swale and southwesterly corner is moderate, due to the lack of suitable outfall. The water tends to percolate into the existing gravel underlying the southwest corner of the subdivision. EAGLE RIVER ANCHORAGE HOMER (907) 694.9846 (9~7} 349,8881 (907) 235-8179 Page 2 S & S Engineers, Inc. Bavarian Heights Soils Report; February 18, 1983 Job 1119 The surficial soils in this area were deposited during the final glaciation. The primary depositional agents included ice, streams, outwash, and ponds. These produced a somewhat complex series of materials varying widely in character. The northern half of the ridge extending along the east side of the property consists of several feet of silts and silty sandy gravel overlying a fairly well graded sandy gravel to gravelly sand. This material was quite dense and had a moderate to low moisture content with no water table conditions encountered. A slight water seep was encountered at 7' - 8' deep in three of the test holes dug. The percolation tests performed in this area were acceptable for on site waste disposal systems. In the southeast corner of the property, soils consist of a bluish gray sandy silt to clayey silt. The deposit is essentially impervious. It has a low moisture content and very firm consistency except were it is in contact with surface water. Test pit information indicates the silts and clay are underlain by a very dense sandy gravelly cobble. This material is also impervious. None of the perc tests performed in this area met the Municipal Standards for waste disposal systems. The small hill and side slopes in the northwest portion contain a thin veneer of silty sands overlying stratified sandy gravel to gravelly sand. These sands and gravels contain some very thin and apparently discontinous silt beds or lenses. The materials have a low moisture content and all test holes performed in this area will meet the existing Municipal criteria for on site waste disposal systems. The southwest corner of the property consists of gravelly cobble to sandy gravel which is overlain by a thin two foot veneer of silty sandy clays. In some locations closer to the southwest corner of the property the gravel comes entirely to the surface. These gravels are very pervious and at this time a water table exists in this area varying from three feet to nine feet. With proper drainage considerations, this area could meet the existing Municipal criteria for on site waste disposal systems. Page 3 S & S Engineers, Inc. Bavarian Heights Soils Report; February 1.8, 1983 Job 1119 We conclude that the area under consideration known as Bavarian Heights Subdivision is unsuitable for the most part under its present zoning for subdivision development. A cluster development or PUD is recommended. As can be seen from the attached drawing, approximately 60% of the proposed subdivision property has ground that is unacceptable for on site waste disposal systems due to poor soils ahd/or groundwater conditions. A comprehensive drainage plan engineered for this 50-acre parcel would allow the use of on-site waste disposal systems on an additional 20-30% of this acreage. Drainage characteristics should be addressed during initial subdivision design. This is particularly important in the southwest corner of the subdivision where surface drainage improvements will be required° The water in the southwest corner of the subdivision apparently comes from a combination of surface flow off of the hill to the east and deep ground water flow coming out of the peat bog in the north central portion of this subdivision. Depending upon road configuration and subdrain placement, this area could very easily be permanently dewatered. ~here are also some sporadic water seeps at varying depths located along the hill on the east side of the property and the mid central portion of the property. These water seeps are for the most part quite deep and should not interfere with any residential home foundations, nor any on site septic systems. Foundation subbase material will vary and also require individual attention prior to construction. For example, materials on site vary in frost susceptibility from NFS to F-4. Consistency of the granular material appears to be generally medium dense to dense. The finer materials or cohesive soils appear to range from stiff to w~ry firm. Where exposed to excessive moisture, commonly near the surface, the cohesive ~terials are soft. Because of the wide variety of soils within this large 50-acre tract, it is recommended that all foundation designs be subject to engineering analysis prior to foundation construction. Page 4 S & S Engineers, Inc. Bavarian Heights Subdivision; Job 1119 Pebruary 18, 1983 We appreciate conducting this preliminary examination for you and ask that you contact us if any additional information is required at 349-6561. Will~am C~- Hagma-i~er Engineer TRS:WCH:dd u5~; REPRESENTATIVE SOIL PROFILES AND PERCOLATION TESTS BAVARIAN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISIO~T Soils Test TABLE 1 TEST HOLE # 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4O 41 42 43 44 TOTAL DEPTH 11.0 ft. 13.0 ft. 1~.0 ft. 11.0 ft. 10.0 ft. 13.0 ft. 11.0 ft. 11o0 ft. 1~.0 ft. 13o5 ft. 10.5 ft. 12.0 ft. 10.5 ft. 13.5 ft. 13.0 ft. 12.0 ft. 11.5 ft ~2.5 ft 11.5 ft 13.5 ft 19.0 ft 15.0 ft 12.0 ft 10.0 ft ~> 10.0 ft. ' 18.0 ft. 11.0 ft. 9.0 ft. 15.5 ft. 10.0 ft. 14.0 ft. 16.5 ft. 10.0 ft. 13.0 ft. 10.0 ft. 13.0 ft. 10.0 ft. 17.0 ft. 13.0 ft. 11.0 ft. 11.0 ft. 11.0 ft. 12,0 ft. SOIL CLASSIFICATION PERC. RATE SM/ML .ML SM/G SM/G SM/GM nL/CL SM/ML SM/ML SP/GM GW/SP SM/GM SP/GM ~/~ SM/GM SM/sp GP SP GP/SP SM/SP GM/GP GW/GM SP SP SP GW GW GW SP/GP SM/Sp GW GW GM/SM G: /SP SM/ML GW 6p/sp ow GW/SW ML/CL nonpercable nonpercable nonpercable nonoercable ,nonpercable nonpercable nonpercable nonpercable 22 min./in (water seep 8.6 min/%n 40 min/in 48 min/in (water seep, 8 ) 12 rain/in (water seep, 8') 34 rain/in nonpercable nonpercable nonpercable (water seen,6 nonpercable nonpercable(water seep, 6 visual perc(water seep,6' visual perc(grd, wtr.,ll' visual perc(grd, wtr.,3') nonpercable(water seep,7.? 17 min/in(water seep, 11.4 min/in(seep, 11.5') 7.5 min/in 5.7 min/in visual perc(grd.wtr.,5') 2.5 min/in visual perc 7.5 min/in visual perc 60 min/in visual perc visual perc 8.8 min/in 88 min/in 26.6 min/in(wtr, seep nonpercable visual perc(Erd, wtr. 9' visual perc visual perc(~rd, wtr, 3' visual perc(grd, wtr. 6' nonpercable ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 99502 PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED FOR: LEGAL DESCRIFTION: Bruton Subdivisinn HnlA ~l Section 35, T12N, R3W, SM DATE PERFORMED: Ant ?q lqR1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 COMMENTS PT SM/ML Brown Silty clay with some cobble GM Gray hardpan gravelly silt very dense, SM/ML Gray silty clay very stiff clay 9:20 9:50 10:15 10:50 · 11:20 12:00 SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? NO IF YES, AT WHAT / 'O P 10/29 0 ~l 0 0 #1 10/29 30 Min. 30 Min 1/4" I/4" --#2 10/29 55 Min 55 Min 3/8" 3/8" ' #3 10/29 90 Min 90 Min 1/2" 1/2" ~4 10/29 120 ~in 120 ~4in 1/2" 1/2" PERCOLATION RATE TEST RUN DETWI"EN NonDercab] e (mlnut.t/inch) 7 , FT AND 0-- FT ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway ^nchora~e, Alaska .n950~ PERCOL.AT3ON TEST PeR~OmMEO ~Om: Bruton Subdivision TH #2 DATEPERFORMED: October 29, 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION.' Sec. 35~ T12N~ R3W., SM PT ML Gray Silty Sandy Clay Very dense SLOPE SITE PLaN I0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17, 18- 19- 20- COMMENTS PERFORMED WAS GROUND WATER ~10 ~ ENCOUNTERED? O P · e IF YES. AT WHAT .... DEPTH? Reedimg gate Gross Net De,th to Net Time Time Water Oroo #0 lU/~ u' u u 0 #1 " 30 min 30 min l/a" 1/4" #2 " 70 min ~0 min 1/2" 1/4" ~3 " 110 min 40 min 1/2" 0 #4 " 150 min 40 min 1/2" 0 9:00 9:30 IO:.IO 10:50 11:30 PEnCOLAT~O~ ~ar~ nonpercable I~.u,,,/~ TEST RUN OET;V'~E~ 7 ~T AND 8 FT Surface water entering excavation ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 99502 PI:RFO~M ED FOR; Bruton Subdivision TH #3 DATE PeR f-'ORMED; LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35, TI2N, R3W, SM [] $OI~S LOG PERCD[.ATION TEST October 29, 1981 C 6 2 1 2 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11 13 14 15- 16 17 18 19 20 COMMENTS PT SM Blue Gray Silty sand SM/GM Grayish, moist sandy silt with' SLoPe SITE PI.AN 9:30 10:10 10:45 11:15 ENCOUNTERED? NO O IF YE'S, ATWHAT , e DEPTH? #0--'- 10/29 0 o o u -- #1 " 40 40 3/8" 3/8" ~2 75 35 i/2" #3 " 105 30 1/2" 0 Surfac Water Iifiltrat~on Ruined Peic. P£RC:OLATION flare Nonpercabl e (minute,Ii.h) Test muN e~TV~EN --~ . ~T ANO 7 PT Surface water entering excavation ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway ^nchora~e, Alaska 9950~ PERCOLAT)ON TEST PERFORMED FOR.' Bruton, Subdivision TH #4 DATe PERFORMED: Bctober 29, 1981 LEGALOESCRIPTION.' Sec. 35) T2N~ R3W~ SM 1 PT 4 5 6 7 CL Blue silty clay SM/GM Blue Gray sandy silt very dense cobble intermixed in silt eLoPe SITe Pt.AN 10 11 12 13- e.coU.TE.eo? . IF YES. AT WHAT E QEPTH? .... 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- lg- 20- Reading Oete Gross Net Oei3th to Net Time Time Water Drop 0 IU/ZD U U U U #l " 30 30 0 0 F~ OU JU U U #3 " 100 40 O 0 9:40 10:10 10:40 11:20 11:50 PERCOLATION EATE TEST RUN ¢3ET~F~J Surface water entering excavation ,,~' ~"~ C~TI~IE~ ~Y: ~'~,_ Nonpercabl e (m~.u,.,/i~h) 7 8 FT AND FT ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Hi0hway Anchorage, Alaska 9050~ SOILS LOG PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED FOR= Bruton Subdivision TH #5 · DATE PI-'RFORMED: October 29, 1981 LEGAl. DESCRIPTION.' 1 PT 2 ML 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 COMMENTS Sec. 35, T12N~ R3W~ SM Brown silty clay SM Brown silty sand SM/GM Dark brown gravelly silt 10:00 10:45 11:20 11:50 12:20 SLOPE SITE P [..AN WAS GROUND WATER S P IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? ..... Reading Date Time Time O 1U/X~ U #1 " 45 45 #2 80 35~ #3 " 110 30 #4 " 140 30 1/4" 1/2" 1/2" Drop u 1/4" 1/4" 0 1/2" PERCOLATION RATE' TEST RUN 13ETW~EI~J Nonpercable (minut el/Inch) 5 ~T ANO ---2/--- ~'r ENGINEERS-SURVEY6RS 7125 Old Seward Highway ^nchora~e, Alaska 99502 065 SOILS LOG PERCOLATION TES'T PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision TH #6 OATE PERFORMED:October 29, 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 PT 2 3- 4- 5- 6 7- 8- 9- 10- 11 13-__ 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- lg- 20- COMMENTS Sec. 35, T12N, R3W~ SM ML Light Brown silty clay CL Blue silty clay SM Silty sand with cobbles, dense Large persentage of fines SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? r~]o , IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? 0 10/29 0 0 0 0 #1 " 30 30 0 0 #2 " 60 30 0 0 ~q qilY~m~ wRt'o~ crnfmminRtin 10:15 10:45 I1:15 TEST ~U~ Surface water entering excavation NonDercabl e (mlnute,/inch) 7 ,. T*NO 9 ,PT ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 (~ld Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 9.n502 PERFORMEDFOR:. Bruton Subdivision TH #7 DATE PERFORMED:, LEGAL DESCRIPTION; SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM [-I SO~LS LOG PERCOL^TION TE~-T October 29, 1981 O66 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11 13- 14- 15- 16 17 18 19 20 COMMENTS PT SM/ML Blue gray silty sand and clay moist SLOPE WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? NO IF YES, AT WHAT ..... ' DEPTH? :L1:10 0 10/29 0 0 0 0 11:50 #1 " 40 40 1/4" 1/4" 12:30 #2 80 -=4-0- 1/2" 1/4" 12:50 #3 " 100 20 5/8' 1/8" Sur"ace water :onfaminatlon pERCOLATION RArE nonpercabl e 5 7 TEST RUN ~ST~/~F~ F'r ANO -- , FT Surface water enterin9 excavation ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 99502 /-~ SOILS LOG 06 7 [] .PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED FOR: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Bruton Subdivision TH #8 Sec. 35, T12N, R3W, SM DATE PERFORMED: October 29, 1981 4- 5- 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 !9 2O COMMENTS PT SM/ML Blue silty clayey sand, very moist 10:30 11:00 11:30 11:50 SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? P E Readin~ Date Gro~s Net Depth to Net Time Time Watar Droo 0 10/29 0 0 0 0 #1 " 30 30 1/8" 1/8" #2 ,, 60 30 1/8" ~ ~ Clrr¢;~r~ w~r r'~n~nmi~atilln PERCOLATION RArE TE.qT RU~ eET~d Surface water entering excavation. NonDercabl e (minutes/in,:h) 6 8 FT AND FT ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorane, Elaska PERCOLATION 'rEST PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision TH #9 October 29, 1981 DATE PERFORMED:- Sec. 29, T12N, R3W, SM 1 2 3 4 7 8 10 11 12 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- COMMENTS PT SP Black sand Moist GM/ML Brown si'lty gravel, with cobble, dense SITE PLAN ENCOUNTERED? yes ~ water seep at 6.0' p · E 0 10/29 0 0 0 0 1 " 30 30 1 1/2" 1 1/2' 2 " 60 30 2 3/4" I 1/4"-- 1I:30 12:00 12:30 F~cot.~loN R^~ 22 min/in im~,,ut,,/)~) 5 7 TEST RUN ~T'~F.,I'd F'r AND ~ . ~T Black sand lenses interspersed in the silty gravel ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway · ^nchorane, Alaska ~9502 SO~LS LOG . PERCO/_AT1ON TEST 063 PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision TH #10 Sec. 35, T12N, R3W, SM LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8- 9- 10- 11 13 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- COMMENTS PT SM/GM Silty sandy gravel, dense, wfth cobble GW/SP Black sand~ gravel SLOPE SITE PLAN SM/GM Silty sandy-gravel WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? NO IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? P Gross Net Depth to Net Reading Date Time Time Water Droo 0 10/29 0 0 0 0 1 " 15 15 2" 2" 2 " 30 15 ~" 2" 3 " 45 15 5 3/4" 1 3/4" 4 " 60 15 7 1/2" I 3/4" 11:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 8.6 min/in P£RCOLATID N RA~'E {minut~s/i~h) 7 9 ENG I NEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska .n.n50~ SOILS LOG PERCD LATIDN TES-F PERPDRMED FDR: Bruton Subdivision TH #11 DATE PERFORMED: October 29, 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35, T12N, R3W, SM 070 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19- 20- COMMENTS PT SM/GM Silty sandy gravel SLOPE SITE PLAN r- WAS GROUND WATER NO ~'- ENCOUNTERED? , IF YES. AT WHAT DEPTH? 0 10/29 0 0 0 0 1 " 30 30 1 1/4" I 1/4" 2 " 60 30 2 3/4" 3 " 9~ 30 3 1 _ 4 " 180 30 3 3/4" 3/~" 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 PERCOLATION RATE' 40 min/i n .(mlnutll/i~<h) TEST RUN GET'~V~E~J ~ ~ - FT AND ----.~.-. FT Sandy ]enses ~nterspersed in s~lty 9rave] 2" - a" lenses ENGINEERS-SURV. EYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 99502 PERFORMED FORt. Bruton Subdivision TH #12 DATE PERFORMED= LEGAL, DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35, T12N, R3W, SM 07 .PERCOLATION TEST October 29, i981 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9, 10 11 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- PT GM/ML SP Black Sand (water seep at 8') ELOPE SM SITE PLAN Brown Sil.ty Sand WAE GROUND WATER S ENCOUNTERED? NO ~ only a water seep at 8~ P · E IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 #0 10/29 0 0 0 0 #1 " 30 30 1/2" 1/2" #2 " 60 30 I 1/2" #3 " 90 30 1 5/8" 5/8" 48 PERCOLATIDN RATE' 5 TEST RU~ ~ETW~C~I , FT AND COMMENTS GM/HL material was perced because of the water seep at 8' perc at better than 15 min/in. 7 , FT The SP material will ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 ~ld Seward Highway Anchorage, ~.laska ~0502 PERFORMED FOR:. Bruton .Subdivision TH #13 DATE PERFORMED: L~[GALDESCRIPTION; Sec. 35, T12N, R3W, SM ~'J PERCO~-ATION October 29, 1981 072 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lO 11 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20 COMMENTS PT SM Brown silty sand ~P Brown sand dense, moist (water seep at 8') Brown silty sand with cobble 1:00 1:15 1:30 1:45 2:00 · SLOPE WAS G~DUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? NO only a water seep at 8' IF YE~E, AT WHA'r DEPTH? · ' ..... 0 10/29 0 0 0 0 1 " 15 15 1 1/2 1 1/2 2 " 30 15 3 I 1/2 3 " 45 15 4 1/4 1 1/4 4 " 60 I5 5 I/2 I I/~ pERCOlATION FIAT~' 12 rain/in .(minut,dh'~h! TEST RUN {3ETW~EE.~ -- 5 . PT AND __7 . FT ENG I NEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Hight,!ay ^nchora~e, t~.laska 99502 [] SOILS LOG [] PERCOLATION TEST (_)72 PERFORMED FOR: Bruton. Subdivision TH #14 DATE PERFORMED: October 29, 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 PT 2 3 4 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11 13- 14- 15- 16- 17 18 19 20 COMMENTS Sec. 35, T12N~ R3W, SM SM Brown silty sand ~M/GM Sandy gravelly silt SLOPE SITE PLaN 1:15 1:45 2:10 2':45 3:00 3:30 WAS GROUND WATER S ENCOUNTERED? NO L IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? ...... o o o 1 3n 30 2 " 55 25 2" 3 " 90 35 2 3/4" 3/~" a " 105 15 3 1/4 5 " 135 30 3 7/8 7/8 TEST RUN DET'A/~F.~J 7 · FT AND 9 -PT O7 n co ENG IHEERS- SURVEYORS 7125 01d Seward Highwa,, Anchorage, 2.1aska 99502 [] PERCOLATION TEST ~Em~ORMEO Fom: Bruton Subdivision TH #15 DATE PERFORMED: October 29, 1981 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 HL 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 COMMENTS Sec. 35, T12N, R3W, ~M Surface water at 5' SITE' PLAN Yel 1 ow-brown silty clay WAS G~OU~O WATER IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? PERCOLA'rlO N I{^TE Nonpercabl e _ (mlnut .I/ira:h) FT AND -- FT ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska ~9502 SOILS LOG 0.7S PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision TH #16 DATE PERFORMED: Qctober 29~ 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION.' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SEC 35. T12N. R3W. SM PT SM/GM Brown silty gravel groundwater/surface seep at 4' SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER Yes ENCOUNTERED? IF YES, AT WHAT 4~ DEPTH? Oro$~ Net Depth to Net Reading Dete Time Time Water Drop PERCOLATION RATE Nonpercable (mlnute~/i~ch) FT AND , FT COMMENTS ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, ~.1 aska PERCOlATiON TEST PI=RFORMEDPOR: Bruton Subdivision TH #17 OATEPERFORMED: nctober 29, 1981 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14- 15.- 16- 17- 19- PT SEC. 35~ T12N~ R3W~ .SM ' SM/GM/SP Brown silty sandy gravel with sand seams 'SP SP~-~_-water seepage SM- through sand lens and along silt bed 20- SP SLOPE SITE PI_AN ENCOUNTERED? L water seepage at 6' IF YE~, Al' WHAT DEPTH? pERCOLATION EATE Honpercabl e (minute=linch) TEST RUN D~TV~/~E,F,J ~ ,~ JOT ANO FT ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 01d Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 99502 r'l SOILS LOG I"'1 PERCOLATION TES-T PERPORMED FOR:. Bruton Subdivision TH #18 DATE PERFORMED: October 29~ 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 PT 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 COMMENTS SEC. 35, T12N~ R3W, ~M Brown sandy silt dense SLOPE SITE Pt_AN 3:00 3:25 3:45 4:15 4:45 WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? NO P · E IF YES. AT WHAT DEPTH? 0 10/29 0 0 0 0 1 " 25 25 1/8" 1/8" 2 " 45 20 1/4" 1/8" 3 " 75 3n 1/4" O 4 " 105 30 3/8" PERCDLATIO N RATE Nonpercabl e , Iminut e~/i~h| TEST RU~,J GET'~,~EI~,I 7 , FT AND 9 ;T ENG INEERS-SURV~YORS 7125 (lld Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska .n.n5n. 2 SO~LS LOG PERCOLATION TeET 078 PERFORMED FOR:. Bruton Subdivision TH #19 oATePeR~oR~eo:~Gtober 29, 1981 _ LI:OAc OES:RI~I'ION:__ SEC. 35. T12N. R3W, SM 1 PT 7- 8- ML Silty Clay Silty sandy cobble SP Brown sand SM/GM Silty sandy cobble SLoPe I0~ 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 COMMENTS WAS GIqOUNO WATER NO S eNCOUNTERED? L O Water Seepage at IF YES, AT WHAT e DEPTH? pERCOLATiON RATE ,qonpercabl e (mimut.,/ir~ch) TEST RUN ~)~T~/EEJ~j -- ,-- Fl' AND -- , FT Non~ercable due to water seepa0e ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 ~ld Seward Hinh~,~av Anchorane, 2,1aska 99592 so, s LOG 07:3 PERCOLATION TEST PEREORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision TH #20 DATE PERFORMED: October 29, 1981 LEGAt. DESCRIPTION.' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8- 9- 10 11 13- 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O COMMENTS SEC, 35, T12N, R3W, SM PT GP ~ Sandy gravel -- saturated CL Gray clay moist SLOPE SITE PlAN CL WAS GROUND WATER $ ENCOUNTERED? NO ~ Gray caly (surfa~ ?~r seepage) p very dense ~F YES, AT WHAT E DEPTH? ........ Reading Date Gro~s Net Depth to Net Time Time Water Drop PERCOLATIOHRATE Nonpercable (minut es/i~,ch) TEST RUN DET'vkrEE.~'4 FT AND FT Nonpercable due to surface water seepage See Pictures #9 & 10 PERfOrmeD ~¥: -~5~ C~,~,E~ .¥~ ,.-_-~'~ DATe: /~,,,~-~.,,f.<,' ENGI'NEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 99502 SOILS LOG PERCOLATION TEST 'ERFORMI:O FO~:. Bruton Subdivision 'TH #21 DA-ri: pi:F~FOFiMI:D; October 29, 1981 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9- 10- 11 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19-__ 20- PT SEC 35, T12N, R3W~ SM :OMMENTS See pies 4-8 . CL Yellow silty clay SP Black sand saturated SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER S ENCOUNTI:RED? Yes ~L P · E IF YES. AT WHAT OI:PTH? 11 ft. PERCOLATIO h' R,~,TE' ~lo~l~rcB~l ~ _ (rninute~/ir, ch] TEST RUN D,~T'A/~'Nj -- ,. FT AND --, FT The percable soil (SP) was saturated preventing any perc test. Sample end Test Eumber Sheet Number SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA AND COMPUTATION SHEET Weight of S~ple Sieve O'~enin~s Weight Cumulative Inches Millio Sieve Retained Percent Percent · meters Mesh in Grams Retained Yiner 2. O0 1.50 1. 050 26.67 0.742 18.85 ' o. ~85 L~. 33 ~/Z" 0 ':' 0 ~ I oo °--~ C. 371 9.42~ O. 263 6. 680 ~ 0.185 4.699 4 0 ~ 0~ l~~ O. 131 3. 327 ~ C. 093 2. 362 ~ o. 065 z. 65z zo O ~ ~ ~ / ~o *~ 0.046 1.168 ~ O. 0328 O. ~3 ~ O. ~32 0. 589 ~ 0.0164 0.417 ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ O, 0116 O. 295 ~ o. ~ o. 208 ~ o.~s o. 247 zoo I 5~ WO °~ ~0~ O. ~42 O. 104 ~ 0. ~18 O. 046 ~ T~AL R~mRES: SOILTEST INCORPORATED . 2205 LEE STREET · EVANSTCt4, ILLINOIS, ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska .rig502 PERFORMED FOR: Bruton ~ubdivisio~ TH #22 DAl~E PERFORMED: LEGAL DE$CRIFTION: SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM TEb-I' October 30, 2981 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10- 11 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- lq- 20- COMMENTS PT ML GP SP Silty clay Gravelly cobble Gray sand saturated ~LOPE SITE PLAN SM Silty sand WAS OROUND WATER Yes ENCOUNTERED? IF YES, AT WHAT SH DEPTH? ...~ Black silty sand Reading Date Gross Net C)eplh to PERCOLATION RATE nonpercabl e minutes/ r,ch) TEST RUN ~3~T',v~F.~J FT AND -- I=T The percable soi'ls (GP and SP) were sat'urated, p~'evaDtiDc~ aDy pert test. (see pic. #10) ~ame: Sample and Test Number Sheet Number SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA AND COMPUTAT~0N SHEET Weight of Sample ~_~0£ Sieve O)enin~s Weight Cumulative Inches Milli- Sieve Retained Percent Percent meters Mesh in Grams Retained ~iner 2.00 1.50 1.050 25.6? 0.742 18.85 0.371 9.422 0.265 6.680 O. 185 4. 699 4 6 ~ ~-- 2~ 6__~ ~ U ~.__Z O. 131 3. 327 C.093 2.362 0.065 1.~5z zo I 4~! ~--~ 0.046 1.168 /14' 0.0328 0,833 0.0232 0.589 o.o~64 o.417 ~+0 z~l ~_~ 0.0116 0.295 o. o0~ 0.208 0.00~8 0.147 lOO t %~2~ 0.0041 0.104 0.0029 0.074 200 l~SZ k 0.0018 0,046 ~ f~ ~ 2_540± i O0o..~ TOTAL S01LTEST INCORPORATED . 2205 LEE STREET · EVANSTON, ILLINOIS, PERFORMEO FOR:. ENG I NEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 99502 Bruton.Sobdivisioh TH #23 [] . PERCOLATION TEST DATe PERPORMED; ~lctober 23, 1981 LEGAL DESCF~IPTION: SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O ;QMMENT$ PT SH Brownish/gray silty sand Dense SP~Black sand ~Water seep along clay layer CL Blue gray dense clay SLOPE SITE PLAN WASGROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED? NO Water seep along clay layer I~ YES, A? ~HA? DEPTH? P£RCOLATIO N RATE TEST RUN Nonpercable due to water seepage. Non0ercab'le . Irni~ut,,/h~.ch) AND __ , FT rlH¢o ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 99502 PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision ' TH #24 DA~E PERFORMED: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM SOILS LOG TEST qctober 30, [981 1 2 3 4 7 8- 9- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 PT ML GM/GP SM/ML Water seep along silty layer 1:25 2:00 2:15 2:30 2:45 3:00 3:15 3:30 SLOPE WAS GROUNO WATER ENCOUNTERED? NO SITE PLAN IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? 0 10/30 0 0 0 0 1 " 35 35 2" 2 2 50 lb b" 1 3 65 15 4 1/8" 1 1/8" 4 80 lb b 1/8" 1 5 95 15 6 1/8" 1 6 110 15 I 7/8" 7 125 15 7 7/8 7/8" PERCOLATION RATE TEST RUN D.~ T',~,~E.~J 17 rain/in. I~,,,/~:~! 6 FT AND ~ FT COMMENTS Suhd].v2. slon t. EGALDESCR.'TION: SEC, 35, T12N, R3~Y, SH ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 gld Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 99502 SOILS PERCOLATION TEST TH #25 DA'~E PERFORMED: October 30, 198--1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10- 11 13 14- 15- 16.- 17 18 19 20 PT 6w/6 Brownish gray gravel with traces of fines -~ water seep along silt bed Silty Sand 1:45 2:00 2:15 2:25 2:35 2:45 SLOPE SITE PL..AN WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? IF YES. AT WHAT DEPTH? "2 10,/,30 Time 0 15 30 4O 5O 6O Net Time U 15 15 10 10 10 1 1/2" 2 1/2" 3 1/2 4 5/8 5 1/2 1 1/2" 1 1 1/8 - 7/~{ PEF',COLATIO N RATE TEST RUN ~DETV,/E E.~J 11.42 min/in, 4 FT AND COMMENTS ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 99502 PERFORMED FOR:, LEGAL DESCRIPTION= Bruton Subdivision 'TH #26 SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM DATE PERFORMED: ~ SOILS LOG 087. [] . PERCOLATION TEST October 30, I~R1 1 2 3 4 6- 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18- 19- 20- PT SM Silty sand SP Gray sand COMMENTS PERFORMED BY: ~.~ 2:15 2:30 2:45 3:00 3:15 SLOPE SITE PLAN ENCOUNTERED? NO ~ P E IF YES, AT WHAT ...... Reading Date Gross Net Depth to Net Tim~ Time Water Drop 0 10/30 0 0 0 () 1 15 15 2 1/8" 2 1/8 2 30 15 ~ 1/8 2 3 45 15 6 1/8 2 4 60 15 8 1/8 2 PERCOLAT~O H RATE TEST RUN J~J[T~-~[ EJ~J 7.5 min/in. Imlnu,,,/~h~ 7 ~T AND 9 FT DATE: ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway ^nchora~e, Alaska 99592 ~] SOILS LOG .08S [] PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED FOR: Brutom 'Subdivisfon TH #27' OATE PERFORMED: November 2,. 1981 1 2 -3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 lg 20 :OMMENTS PT SEC. 35, T12N, R3Wt SM , SM Sandy silt SP Gray sand SM/M1 Gray sandy, clayey silt; SP Gray sand Dense 3:25 3:35 3:45 3:55 4:05 4:15 4:25 SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? NO IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? 11/2 0 10 10 2" 2 ZO 30 10 6 1/8" 2 1/8 40 10 8 1/8" 2 50 10 9 7/8" I 3/4 ~u lu ~.L 5/~ J. 314 PERCOLATION flATE ~. 7 m'~n~L__. .(m;nuledlrx;h) TEST RU~ 5ET',~E~FJ t4 FT AND 16 FT ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 nld Seward Highway Anchorage, ~.laska 9950~ SOILS LOG PEF~CO LATION TEb-'T PERFORMFD FOR: Bruton Subdivision ' TH #28 {.EGALDESCRIPTION: SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM DATE PERFORMED,' November 2~ 1981 1 2 3 4 6- 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16- 17- I8- 19- 20- PT SM Sandy Silt SP Gray sand ML Gray silty clay Surface water and ground water infiltration SLOPE SiTE P~AN WAS GROUND WATER S ENCOUNTERED? Yes L IF YES, AT WHAT 5 ~ , E Nonaercable due to water seepaqe T~$T RUN ~TY,/I[~J~ ~T AND FT :OMM~NTS Groundwater appears to result from water seed buildup in sand lens .lust above the' silt/clay layer E"NG I N EERS- SURV EYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 99502 E] SOILS LOG . · PEF~COLATION TES~r PI;RFO~qMED FOR: LI-'GAL DESCRIPTION; 1 PT 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- ;OMMENTS Bruton SubBivision ' TH #29 _ SEC. 35. l'12N. R31.h ~M GM Brown silty gravel GW Gray brown will graded gravel · OATE PE~tFOR~ED: November 2, 198! SLOPE SITE Pt. AN WAS GRQUNO WATER S 11/2 0 0 0 0 30 15 12 6 refille{ hole with water 11/2 0 45 15 6 60 15 12 6 3:00 3:15 3:30 3:30 3:45 4:00 P~RCOLATIOH RATE 2.5 mi n/i n (mimute$/i~ch) TEST RUt,/ 13ETV~E.FJ B ~T ANO 8~. ¢T Sample and Test Eumber Sheet Number r'91 SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA AND COMPUTATION SP~ET Sieve 0 lenin,s Weight Cumulative Inches Milli- Sieve Retained . Ferc ent Percent meters Mesh in Grams Retained ~iner 2. O0 1.5C 1. 050 26.67 0,742 18.85 o.~ ~.~s Y'z" 2_ ~.7'7~- '9'7 ~ 5Z +~ C. 371 9. 423 O. 263 ~. 680 ~ 0.18~ 4.699 4 ~U Z~ ~ ~ 4 ~o% O, 131 3. 327 ~ C.093 2.362 ~ ~ 0.046 1,1aa ~ o. o32s o. ~3 ~ O. ~32 O. 589 ~ 0.0164 0.417 ~0 ~~ ~4~ [~ ~ 0.0116 0.295 ~ o. ~ o. 2oa ~ o. ~a o. ~7 ~oo ~ G ~ ~ ~ q U ~ ~ ~ O. ~41 O. 104 ~ O. ~18 O. 046 ~ ~::~ ~ ~ ~7 ~9~ I O0~ O~ T~AL SOILTEST INCORPORATED . 2205 LEE STREET · EVANSTON, ILLINOIS, U.,,.%A. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 ~ld Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 99502 PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision. 'FH #30 DAI:E PERFORMED: SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM LEGAL DESCRIFTION: [] SOILS LOG ,~ · [] ·PERCOLATION TEST November 2, 1981 1 2 3- 4- 5- 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19- 20- COMMENTS PT GW Sandy gravel SM Silty sand Performed visual perc SITE PLAN V/AS GROUND WATER S ENCOUNTERED? ~'lO oL P IF YES, AT WHAT E DEPTH? ....... PERCOLATION ~^TE Visual perc. TEST RUN ~E'r',~E~I FT AND actual oerc est. 2.5 min/in ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 99502 PERCOLATION TEET PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision ' TH #31 DATE PERFORMED: November 2, 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC. 35, T12N~ R3W~ SM 1 PT GM 3- Silty gravel 4- 5- 6 GW/GM 7 Well graded gravels with some fines 8 SLOPE SITE PLAN 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 Ig :OMMENTS 2:30 2:45 3:00 3 15 3:30 WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? NO P E iF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? 11/2 0 0 0 n 15 15 2 1/4 2 1/4 3n 15 a 1/~ 1 7/~ 45 15 6 1/8 2 60 15 7 1/~ Z PERCOLATIO H RATE 7.5 min/in (~..,,,/i~) 7 ~T ANO 9 FT ENG I NEERS- SU RV EYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway ^nchora~e, Alaska 99502 [] SO~LS LOG 094 [] PERCOLATION TES'T PERFO)~MEO FOR: BrutOn Subdivision TH #32' DATE PERFORMED: November 2.' 1981 SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 2 3 4- 5- 6- 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14-- 15 16 17 18 19 20 PT SP/GP Grayish, tan sand with gravel SP Silty sand SLOPE WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH7 SITE PLAN Reading Actual perc est is appro. 4-5 min/in. Net Visual Perc on SD/GP soils TEST ~U~ ~TV,~F.~ ~'r A~O Performed visual perc on SP/GP soils ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 99502 n soils LOG n PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED FOR= 8ruton Subdivision . TH #33 November 2, 1981 DA~E PERFORMED: ~ALDESCm~T~O.: SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM O95 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 lO- 11 13- 14- 15- 16 17- 18- 19- :OMMENTS PT SM Brown silty sand SP Brown sand SM Brownish silty sand SP Brown/gray sand HL Silty sandy clay SP Brown sand SM/ML Brown sandy clayey silt 1:55 2:30 2:50 3:20 3:45 4:15 4:45 SLOPE SITE PLAN I i WAE GROUND WATER NO ENCOUNTEREO? P E IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? 11/2 U U U U 35 35 5/8" 5/g b5 zu 1" 3/~ 85 30 1 1/2" 1/2 110 25 2" 1/2 140 30 2 1/2" 1/2 170 30 3" 1/2 PERCOLATION RATE TEST RUN DETV-.~F4KJ 60 mi n/in 6 ~T end Teet Numher~, Sheet Number ~ SIEVE ANAL~S~[S DATA AND COMlmO'rATTON SPIE~T Weight of Sample__ ~ ~ ~O! gm. -- Sieve 0{,enin~s Weigh~ Inches Milli- - Sieve Retained _ meters. Mesh in Grams Retai 2. O0 1.5C 1. 050 26.67 O. 742 18.85 C. 371 9. 423 o. 25~ ~. 6so O. 131 3. 327 C.093 2.3~2 0.065 L65~. lO t ~j 2_ 4-'- 0.046 1.168 O. 0328 O. 833 0.0232 0.589 . ~8 0.0116 0.295 o.ooea 0.208 O. 0058 O. 1.7 100 L~ OZ$ 2 7 0. C041 O. 104 0.0029 o.07~ 200 Z. 5~,-7~ O. 0018 O. 046 TOTAL Cumulative Percent ~[ner 09_° SOILTEST INCORPORATED . 2205 LEE STREET · EVANSTON, ILLINOIS, U..S.A.. Brutbn Subdivision SOILS LO~ ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward HiDh,,,:ay Anchorage, Alaska 99502 PERCOLATION TEST TH #34 November 2, 1981 LSOALDESCRIPT)ON: SEC, 35, T12N, R3W, SM 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 13- 14- 16 17 18 lg 20 PT SW Well graded sandy gravel SM Silty sdnd GW Sandy gravel, gray SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED;" '0 IF YES. AT WHAT DEPTH? ....... Visual Perc. Performed visual perc; similar soil to TM #29 & TH ~30 ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway 2.nchorane, 2.1ask'a 99502 Bruton Subdivision PERFORMED FOR:, · TH #35 DATE PERFORMED'. LE~ALOESCm~nON: SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM [] so)cs ¢'1 , PERCOt-AT)ON TEST November 2, 1'981 1 2. 3 4 5 6 7, 8- 9- 10- 11 14- 15- 17- 18- 19- 20- COMMENTS PT SM Silty,sandy, gravel GW Brown sandy gravel WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? -- NO IF YES. AT WHAT DEPTH? PERCOLATION R^r~ .Visual Perc. TEST RUN (3E"('~fEEJ',J FT AND Performed visual perc; similar soil to TH#'s 29, 30, 34 . FT ENG I N EERS- SURV EYORS 7125 {~ld Seward Highway Anchorame, A. laska 9950~. SOILS LOG 09'-3 · PERCOLATION TEST PERFOnMED Fort:. Bruton Subd.ivision TH #36 DATE PERFORMED: November 2, 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 2 3- 4 5- 6 7 8 SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM PT SM/GM Silty sandy gravel GUI Gray sandy gravel some fines SLOPI S~TE PLAN ,,, F 10 11 12 13 14 15- 16- 17- 18- 20- WAS GROUND WATER S ENCOUNTERED? DIO ~ P IF YES, AT WHAT E DEPTH? ..... 0 11/2 0 0 0 0 i " 20 20 4 1/8" 2 45 25 5 7/8" 1 3 55 10 7 1/8" 1 4 " 65 10 8 1/4" 1 1/8 2:30 2:50 3:15 3:25 3:35 P£F[COLATIOH J~Arff 8,8 min/in (m;mut,s/ir,c~) RUN O~TV~ 6 PT AND--8 FT ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 (~ld Seward Highway Anchorame, Alaska 99502 FOR: Bruton Su,bdivision TH #37 DATE PERFORMED: LEGALOE$¢RIFrlON: SEC, 35, T12N, R3W, SM m so, s oc; i O0 November 3, 1981 1 2 3 4 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11 14- 15- 17- 20 PT GM/SM Gray brown gravelly silt SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER NO ~ ENCOUNTERED? O IF YE~, AT WHAT DEPTH? P 11/3 n 0 0 0 30 30 lb 4b 165 90 285 120 3 1/4" 10:15 10:45 11:30 1:00 3:00 88 min/in Sample and Teat }~umber Sheet Number 1 Sieve .0 ~enin~s Weight Cumulative Inches Milli- Sieve Retained Percent Percent meters Mesh in Grams Retained .[iner 2. O0 1.50 1. 050 26.67 O. 742 18.8§ C. ~71 9.42~ 0.263 ~.680 0.185 4.699 4 C. 131 5. 327 C. 093 2. 362 O. 046 1.. 188 O. 0328 O. ~3 O. ~32 O. 589 O. 0116 O. 295 o. ~ o. 208 0.0029 o. o74 200 ZOOo~ 71 ~ ~7z~, O. ~18 O. 048 T~AL SOILTEST INCORPORATED · 2205 LEE STREET . EVANSTON, ILLINOIS, ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward High,a,.,. Anchorage, Alaska 99502 [] soIts t. O~ o~ {~ PERCOLAT)ON ~ERFORMEO FOR: Bruton Subdi'visio~ TH #38 DATE PERFORMED: November 3~ 198I LEGAL DESCRIPTION:__ S~C. 35. T12N, R3H. SM PT GM/SM Silty cobble 4 _uil samplr~ ken ? 8 9 lO 11 12 12 14 17 18 20 SP/GM Sandy cobble water seep along silt layer GM/ML Silty cobble SLOPE .'OMMENT$ ENCOUNTERED~ Yes L 0 P IF YES, AT WHAT E DEPTH? 7' 0 11/3 0 0 0 0 1 " 30 30 2" 2" 2 60 ~U 3 1/8" 1 1/8 3 150 90 6 1/4" 3 1/8 4 270 120 empty 4 refill 0 0 0 0 5 ~o ~u ~ ~/8 i i/8 10:30 11:00 11:30 1:00 3:00 3:90 3:30 26.6 min/in ~.5 6.5 ENG I FLEERS- SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, /~,laska 99502 PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision TH #39 LEGAL DESCRI~ION: SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM DATE PERFORMED: November 3, 1981 1 2 3 4. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13- 14- 15- 16 17 18 19 2O PT SM/ML Gray, silty clay with some cobble Very dense SLOPE WAS GROUND WATER S ENCOUNTERED? N0 P IF YES, AT WHAT . E DEPTH? SITE PLAN PERCOLATION RATE Honoercable (rn;nut,$/inch) FERFOR~,!EO BY: /.~.,.,~J~ CERTIFIED ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 ~ld Seward Highway Anchorane, Alaska 9950~ [] SOILS LOG CJ PERCOLATION 104, PERFORMED FORt Bruton Subdivision TH #40 DATE PERFORMED: November 6, 1981 LEGAL OE$CRIPT1ON: 1 PT 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 11 13- 14- 15- 16 17 18 19 20 SEC. 35, TI~N~ R3W?.SM SM Tan silty sand GW Sandy gravel, moist SLOPE SITE PLAN Water flow thru gravel, no underl],ing silt bed WAS GROU~O WATER Yes s ENCOUNTERED? , IF Y~S, AT WHAT OEPTH? pI[RCOLATIONRATE Visual Perc. TEST RUN ~3~T~,~EJ'J ....... __ FT ANt) ........ FT Performed visual perc; soils similar ~o TH #10 COMMENTS PERFORMED FOR:. Bruton Subdivision ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 995n.~. [] SO~LS LO(; 10S [] . PERCO [-ATION TEST TH #41 DATE PERFORMED: November 6, I981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION; SEC° 35, T12N, R3W, SM 1 2 3- 4~ 6- 7 8 9 10 11 ~2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20° PT SM Silty sand GP/SP Gray sandy gravel ML Brownish gra'y silt COMMENTS Performed visual SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? NO IF YES. AT WHAT DEPTH? Gro~s Net De01h to Net Date Time T~me Water Drop PERCOLATIOH RATE Visual Perc. (m~nut=~/i~h) TEST RO~ DET',~ .... PT AND ..... FT perc. soils similar to Th #27 and 26 Date: _ Sheet Number SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA AND COMPUTATION SHEET Wei~h~ or S,~p~e I~o(,~. 5"-' .~. Sieve Openings Weight Cumulative, Inches Milli- Sieve Retained Percent Percent meters Mesh in Grams Retained ~iner 2.00 1. 050 26.67 C. ~71 9. O. 2~ 6. 680 O. 185 4,699 O. 131 3. 327 6 C, 093 2. 562 8 o. o~6 L ~6e ~4 O. 0528 O. ~5 20 0.~5~ 0.589 O. ~ O. 208 65 Passed ~.esh Sieve T~AL SOIl. TEST INCORPORATED · 2205 LEE STREET · EVANSTON, ILLINOIS, U..S.A. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 ~ld Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 9950~ [] SOILS LOG [] PERCOLATION TEST 10 PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision TH #42 DATE PERFORMED: November 6, 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 2 3 4 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- lO- 11 13- 14- 16- 17 18 19 20 PT GW · SEC. 35~ T12N, R2W, SM . Brownish orange sandy gravel COMMENTS Nonpercable due to. groundwater. in TH#'s 30 & 31 SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER Yes s ENCOUNTERED? ~ P E IF YES. AT WHAT 3 ~ OEPTH~ PERCOLATION RATE Nnng~rR~b]~ (minut.s/i~h) TEST RUN DET~A/~Cr-~I , PT AND , FT However gravel is similar to soil found ENG I NEERS-SURV,~iYORS 7125 ~ld Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 90502 g-I EOILS LOG [] PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdi'vision TH #43 DATE PERFORMED: November 6, 1981 SEC. 35, T12N, R3W, SM LEGAL D ESCRIFTION: 3 4 5 6 7- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O COMMENTS TH #29 PT ML Silty sandy clay -- GW/SW grayish brown. sandy gravel SLOPE SITE PLAN WAE GROUND WATER S ENCOUNTERED? Yes __ ~ P E IF YES. AT WHAT DEPTH? 6' _ PERCOLATION RArE._Nonperca bl e (minut,t/irmh) TEST RU~ J3ET'A/EE~J ....... FT AND ....... FT Nonpercable due to groundwater. However gravel is similar to soil found in ]')ate: SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA AND cOMPUTATION SH~T Sample and Test Number Sheet Number 100 Weight of Sample I~/Q~'~. gm. Sieve 0 lenin~s. Weight Cumulat ire Inches Milli~ Sieve Retained Fercent l:ercent meters Mesh in Grams Retained Finer 2.00 1.50 O o 742 18.85 C. 371 9. 423 O. 263 6. 680 3 0. 185 4. 699 4 O. 131 3. 327 6 C. 093 2. $E2 S 0. 046 1.1~8 14 O. 0328 O. 553 20 O. 0232 O. 589 28 0.0164 0.41'2 35 0. 0082 0. 208 65 O. CO41 0. 104 150 0.0029 0.0'24 200 ~ , ~ ~,~--, 50~ ~, 0-.~- O. 0018 O, 046 300 TOTAL SOILTEST INCORPORATED . 2205 LEE STREET . EVANSTCH, ILLINOIS, ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 7125 ~ld Seward Highway ^nchora-e, Alaska 99502 SOILS LOG PERCOLATION 3'EST PERFORMED FOR: Bruton Subdivision TH"#44. ' DATE.Em:ORMeD:__.N0vember 6, 1981 __ LFGALDESCRIPTION:____~SE._C. 35. T12N. R3W. SM 1 PT 4- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ML/CL Gray silty clay moist SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER No ENCOUNTI.-'R ED? IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? PERCOLATIOHI{ATE Nonpercable ,(mlnu~es/ir~h~ Inpervious clay very similar to TH #2 and TH #3 LOG OF BORING NO. PROdECT BRUTON SUBDIVISION DATE June, 1979 'I"YPE BORING Solid Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 821' LOCAT;ON See Map COMPLETION DEPTH 11' ~ I~/PT Silts, sandy silts with some gravels, 'Burr ~:o light: bro,rn, moist. "...~ Sands and sandy gravel, gray, damp. x -5 .... xl 5 ".O. X O: 'May ¢ont:ain some random cobbles. ~'.. Encounter soma larger gravels or cobbies. ~0 ~:'". x 2~ ' ' · Refusal x . . MOENING-G~ & ASSOC.~ ANCHORAGE~ ALASKA PROdECT TYPE BOE LOCATION i7' tr ~ING s~/~ sH/~ LOG OF BORING NO. Bruton Subdivision Solid Flight Auger See Map DATE June, 1979 SURFACE ELEVATK~ 822' C~PLETION DEPTH 11' SOIL DESCRIPTION 'Silt'with some sand and gravel, soft, Color of silt changes to gray. Gravel with sandy silt, dense. Sandy silt, gray, firm. 11;' ~ 0 2:. x x 1 x x x 2 x x 3 MOENING-G~ Et ASSOC.~ ANCHORAGE~.A~SKA LOG OF BORING NO. M-5 PROdECT Bruton Subdivision DATE June, 1979 ~'YPE BORING Solid Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 820' LOCATION See Map COMPLETION DEPTH 19' z ~ ~ ~ SOIL DESC. R'PTION ii I pT Peat, dark brown, very soft, wet, fibrous __ l/ near the surface but changes to an amorphous · -peat with an increase in depth° .~ ML/SM Silt with gravel blue-gray, stiff, ix  ' Ix 1 X X · 20 2~ -- MOENING-GREY ~ ASSOC.~ ANCHORAGE, ALASKA LOG OF BORING NO. PROdECT TYPE BORING LOCATION Bruton Sub divi.~ion Solid Flight Auger See Map DATE June, 1979 SURFACE ELEVATION 805 ' COMPLETION DEPTH 14 ' SOIL DESCRIPTION PT/ML' 'Water on the surface. Organics and peat, dark brown, fibrous t:o amorphous. SM/ML Silty sand, loose, brown, wet. PT Peat, dark brown, amorphous. SM/ML Sandy silt with gravel, stiff and dry. MOENING-GREY 8 ASSOC. j ANCHORAGP',ALASKA 115 LOG OF BORING NO. A PROJEGT Bruton Subdivision DATE September 28, 1978 TYPE BORING Backhoe .SURFACE ELEVATION 816 LOCATION Lot 6 COMPLETION DEPTH 14~" SOIL DESCRIPTION Sandy silt to silty sand. Reddish brown with some organics. SM/ML Silty gravelly sand to Mravelly silt. Light brown. Low moisture content. GM Silty sandy 'gravel. Gl.i/GP Sandy gravel, light brown. Low moisture content. Sandy gravel with cobbles. Dense. Contains some random discontinuous fine layers. Low moisture content. gravel MOENING-GREY B ASSOC.~ ANCHORAGE~ALASKA LOG OF BORING NO. B PROJECT Bruton Subdivision DATE September 2~ TYPE 13ORING Backhoe SURFACE ELEVATION LOCATION ~,-5 NW COMPLETION DEPTH  m~ ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION C~.- ~ ML/?T Sandy silt with some organics.  I~ Silt and sandy s±lt, brown. Contains some d±seontinuous gravelly and cobbly lenses. --- Moderate to low moisture content. --- · fine t:o medium gravel ,:,.;:~. SW Sand with interbedded6,' .~:..::~ lenses oz' beds 2" to thick. i:;':'.;;?Low moisture content. q.+3 ~ --Medium dense to dense. :¥:::,.? 20 MOENING-GREY ~t ASSOC. ~ ANCHORAGE~ AL/ 11o 1¢78 806 14~ ASKA LOG OF PROJECT Bruton Subdivision TYPE BORING BaCkhoe LOCATION L-2 Center BORING NO. C 1 1'7 DATE September 28, 1978 SURFACE ELEVATE)N 806 COMPLETION DEPTH 12N' SOIL DESCRIPTION ML~PT Sandy-silt'with organics. ML "Silt ~ith some sand,light-Brown. Contaihs some thin gravels &.cbbble lenses. Mbist. ~P/ML Sand, m&dium to fine-grained, with random thin lenses or beds of gravels. Also contains some thin interbedded silts. Dry to moist except at depth where water table is perched on a silt layer. Water Table MORNING-GREY ~ ASSOC., ANCHORAGE, ALASKA LOG PROdEGT Bruton Subdivision TYPE BORING Backhoe LOCATION Hill Top-L 7 OF BORING NO. E DATE Septembe=: 28, 1978 SURFACE ELEVATION 843 'COMPLETION DEPTH 15~' 118 SOIL. DESCRIPTION MI,/PT Silt, red to yellowish brown. Sandy silt to silt, light brown. Low 'moiJture co,lent. ' Upper part contains some root fragments. ' G'~ Gravelly sand to sandy grave].. Contains some thin be~s of fairly homogeneous medium to fine gravels, & interbedded sands. Little to no fines. Materials generally med:Lum dense to dense. Materials same as above. MOENING-GREY & ASSOC.~ ANCHORAGE~ ALASKA LOG OF BORING NO. F 112,, PROdECT Bruton Subdivision DATE September 28, 1978 TYPE BORING Backhoe -SURFACE ELEVAT~DN 815 LOCATION L-3 & Northfield Dr. COMPLET;ON DEPTH 13' O SOiL DESCRIPTION n //~/~.// ML/PT ' Silts with organics, reddish broWn, //~/,, :/ wet from surface runoff. '~/~/ CL/ML Clayey gravelly silt, bluish gray. ~/~ Generally dry & very firm. /;7~ Contains some cobble sized materials, 5.~__,. sub-angular to sub-rounded. · '" SP Sand, gray, med±um to fine grained, medium ..... dense to dense. Note l Water coming into excavation from surface runoff. : .15~ .15 - -20 20- MOENING-GREY 8~ ASSOC., ANCHORAGEjALASKA ' LOG OF BORING NO. H PROJECT Bruton Subdivision DATE September 28, 1978 TYPE BORING Backhoe LOCATION L-Il, E. Side .SURFACE ELEVATION 838 COMPLETION DEPTH 9' ML/PT SM ML-SP/SW red & brown. gray brown, content. & may contain & generally well 5 bed. xcept sands SOIL DESCRIPTION Salidy silt with organics, Wet from surface runoff. Silty sand'to sandy Silt, moderate'~to'low moisture Alternating beds of sand Silt-light gray to brown some fine sands. Sands-light brown to gray graded. Water seepage along silt Materials same as above more prevelant. MOENING-GREY B~ ASSOC.~ ANCHORAGE~ ALASKA 122 CASE: S-6S75 BARVARIAN !IEIGqT$ 5UEDIVIS[ON, BLOCK 1, LOTS ~ THROUGH 9, TEACT BLOCK 2, 50TS ~ THROUGH iq, TRACT ~, BLCCK 3, 5OT$ 1 THROUGH 13, T~CT C WITH L'ACATIgN =-- ' .r ~ -,.' -~.:,~.~_..~.~ {: . .i holds publiche~r~:gco,-ce',~:': ..... ~m.~. _ If ,Fou would like t(;: mnlent on ti~e pro; MUNICIPALITY OP ANCHORAGE POUCH 6-650 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99502 (907) 264-4111 017,-'092-16 COMBS ROBERTS T SRA BOX 465-P ANCH AK 9 9 5 0--/- ...... ..... -:. ~,!.! ~ RABBIT cReeK COHHURIT¥ ceuNcIL The Municipality of Anchorage Platting Board will hold a public hearing concerning this matter at 7:30 p.m. APR ~ 0 .~8~q,, in tile Assembly Hall, 3500 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska. This will be the only public hearing before the Platting Board on this petition and you are invited to appear and voice your opinion. If you would like to comment on the proposed petition, this form may be used for your convenience. Mailing address: Municipal Planning Department, Pouch 6-650, Anchorage, Alaska 99502. Further information is awfilable from tile Planning Department, telephone 264-4267. / l MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE POUCH 6-650 .ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99502 (907) 264-4111 O! 7-092.-17 ) poSTOVERBox 387 JAMES W & THERESA ]'t,~ ~NCHORAGE AK 99510 TOTAL AREA: LOCATION: CURR~HT LEGAL~ BLOCK 1, LOTS 1 THROUGH 9, TRACT A, BLOCK 2, LOTS ~ THROUGE 18, TRACT B, BLOCK 2, tOTS 1 THROUGH 13, TRACT C WITH VACATION the B,L~, NE~4, NW~4 and Ni~, BE~4, Nwl/4 and RABBIT CHEEK COMI4UNIT¥ COUNCIL The Municipality of AncbarDge Platting Board matte at 7:30p.m. APR 2 0 i,983 Anchorage, Alaska will ho!d a public hearing concerning this in the Assembly Hall, 3500 East Tudor Road, This will be the only public hearing before the Platting Board on this petition and you are invited to appear and voice your opinion. If you would like to comment on the proposed petition, this form may be used for your convenience. Mailing address: Municipal Plannin9 Department, Pouch 6-650, Anchorage, Alaska 99502. Further information is available from the Planning Department, telephone 264-4267, ADDt~ESS: Board for the ~unicipallty of Anchorage. 2. The Platting Board for Anchorage shall, at its next regular ~resented with the Judgment of the Court, the Municipality of meeting after being approve the plat which is attached to below listed conditions. he necessity of further xcept for the purpose of 3. Approval of this Stipulation and the Judgment subject to the Approyal shall be immediate and without public hearings or Board deliberation approving said plat. the attached plat shall be preliminary ,lat approval and the Platting Board shall issue a final plat .on Appellant's completion of the conditions for final plat approval as set forth in the Stipulation entered into by the ~arties on this Judgment bases thereon. 4. The development described in the attached plat ~hall be carried out in two phases: the first involving the evelopment of 27 lots (out of a total of 40 lots) which lots ,ill have no high water table problems and which lots are zonsidered dry lots; the second phase involving the remaining 13 lots which do have a groundwater problem. It shall not be necessary to have completed both phases prior to issuance of final plat approval on phase I of this development project. At time as the conditions for final plat approval have been 24 ompleted for phase I, final plat approval shall be granted by he Platting Board for the Municipality of Anchorage, even though he conditions for final approval of Phase II have not yet been satisfied. At such time as Phase I has been completed and a final plat has been approved and recorded, Appellant shall be free to convey any..or all of the 27 lots comprising Phase I of he development. No further public hearings shall be required or final plat approval of either Phase I or Phase II. At such ime as the additional conditions of final plat approval for 'hase II, such final approval sh~ll be granted b~ the Pl~tting ;oard for the Municipality of Anchorage. 5. The specific conditions under which a preliminary ~lat sha].l issue-and which shall be successfully completed for 3O 2 BRIDGER VS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ENTERPRISES Appellant, ~UNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Appellee. Case No. 83-8313 Civil ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT ~1o~o o~ Alas~o, Third Dl~rl~ Clerk of lh~rlal Court¢ On April 4, 1985, the Court, the Honorable J. Justin lipley presiding, heard oral argument op the issues raised by the 5ppellant and the responses thereto by the Appellee. The Court, having considered the pleadings to date, the file, the briefs and having considered the exhibits and affidavits filed herein ruled from the bench the Platting Board would be ordered to issue a )lat to the Appellant based upon certain conditions and that the )arties could agree to to inclusion of certain other conditions )r::.the Cd, hrt!~..would later resolve those conditions not stipulated ~ par t~i e~s' ' ;0 b the ~ :.. The parties have entered into a stipulation setting forth the Court's fi.ndings and conc].usions and the agreements of the ,:parties econcerning those matters not specifically ruled by the_.Court. As a result of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED ^NI) DECREED that: npon I. The Appellant is'determined to be the prevailing y to this'appeal based upon a finding by the Court that the :ecord as a whole lacks substantial evidence forming a reasonable asis for refusal of preliminary plat approval by the Platting 6 ® 20 22 23 24 2& 29 3O Phase I are as follows: p/a. Resolving k/'b. Obtaining Engineers, if required. c. Providing utility easements; a wetlands permit from the Corps a soils report from a soils engineer indicating .which lots may require foundations, and placing an appropriate note on the plat. d. Resolving drainage and drainage easements Public Works Engineering. e. Resolving the need for footing footing drain stubouts with Public Works Engiaeering0 of control required being a registered engineered with drains, and / f. Providing a soils, sedimentation, and erosion plan prior to plat recording. This condition may be by the below referenced subdivision agreement 9n lieu of condition that must be satisfied prior to plat approval. g. Removing the well from the right-of-way or noving the right-of-way outside the well location. h. Resolving the need for any temporary ~urnarounds Northfield with Public Works Engineerisg. i. Resolving the location of the intersection Drlve and Pickett Street with Pablic Works ~//j. Entering into a subdivision agreement for: 1) Creation of Appellant's Community Water System. interior standards. of 2) Subdivision agreement to construct all (3) Northfield Drive to suburban access the subdivision to Rabbit Creel< Road (strip inclusive as set forth in Paragraph 5 above. b.' Installing the under drain system and of conditions a through j, :tandards from ,aving only); 6. The specific )let shall issue and which shall ~hase II are as follows: a. Completion conditions tinder which a preliminary be successfully completed for ,. ( ( monitoring that under drain system for a period of 24 months with final resolution from the Departments of llealth and Public Works to determine tile effectiveness of the under drain system and the ability of each of the i3 lots subject to this condition to function with an on-site septic system. 7. Tile monitoring requirement as set forth in Paragraph 6 above shall be a requirement for the 13 lots of Phase II only. Because the monitoring must extend over a 24 month period, it will be impossible to make applicatioa for final plat approval within the normal 18 month period. As such, the time for final plat approval shall be extended to 30 months :for :ompletion of the Phase II plat spproval. 8. The preliminary plat shall issue Turner, successor to Bridger Enterprises. 9. Tile Appellant shall be free to ina the Court for attorney fee~ as the DATED this ~5~ day of conditions and application for final to Rexford L. ~on to preva EY ~r Court Judge Cleric o£ tk¢ 2}ri02 ~Co~g~ at J, nchorago Received a copy of ~is Judgln~at on tile ~-~_-- (lay of _~J3~-3 7-- , 1985. TItlRD JUDICIAl, DISTRICT AT ANCHORA~ ~RIDGER ENTERPRISES Appellant, VS UNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE ;SEMBLY/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Appellee. No. 83-8313 Civil ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT Clerk of (he~.daI CoUrL~ BY'*'-"-~--_.~__._.__..Dopu~/ RECEIVED JAN 2 9 1986 Municipal Al:tomey On April 4, 1985, the Court, the Honorable J. ,Justin Ri~ley presiding, heard oral argument: on the issues raised by the Appellant and the responses thereto by the Appellee. The Court, having considered the pleadings to date, the file, the briefs and considered the exhibits and affidavits filed herein ruled the bench the Platting Board would be ordered to issue a to the Appellant based upon certain conditions and that the .arties could agree to to inclusion of certain other conditions ~r the Coh~t-~tou].d later resolve those conditions not stipulated to by the partie~.''~ rom let a stipulation setting forth the Court's fi.ndings and conclusions and the agreements of ~he :parties· ~oncernmng those matters not specifically ruled upon ~y the Court. As a result of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: ':The parties have entered into 1. The Appellant is determined to be the prevailing ~arty to this appeal based upon a finding by the Court that the 'ecord as a whole lacks substantial evidence forming a reasonable )asis for refusal of preliminary plat approval by the Platting Board for the biunicipality of Anchorage. 2. The Platting Board for the Municipality of Anchorage shall, at its next regular meeting after being ~resented Qith the Judgment of the Court, approve the plat which .s attached to this Stipulation and the Judgment subject to the below listed conditions. Approyal shall be immediate and without ~he necessity of further public hearings or Board deliberation ~t for the purpose of approving said plat. 3. Approval of the attached plat shall be preliminary ~lat approval and the Platting Board shall issue a final plat pon Appellant's completion of the conditions for final plat ~pproval as set forth in the Stipulation entered into by the ~arties on this Judgmen't bases thereon. 4. The development described in the attached plat ~hall be carried out in two phases: the first involving the development of 27 lots (out of a total of 40 lots) which lots 11 have no high water table problems and which lots are considered dry lots; the second phase involving the remaining 13 lots which do have a groundweter problem. It shall not be ~ecessary to have completed both phases prior to issnance of final plat approval on phase I of this development project. At such time as the conditions for final plat approval have been completed for phase I, final plat approval shall be graeted by the Platting Board for the Municipality of Anchorage, even though the conditions for final approval of Phase II have not yet been atisfiedo At such time as Phase I has been completed nnd a inal plat has been approved and recorded, Appellant shall be 'ree to convey any .or all of the 27 lots comprising Phase I of ~he development. No further public hearings shall be required !or final plat approval of either Phase I or Phase II. At such time as the additional conditions of final plat approval for ~hase II, such f'inal approval shall be granted b~ the Platting ~oard for the Municipality of Anchorage. 5. The specific conditions under which a preliminary ,lat shall issue-and which shall be successfully completed for 4 7 9 24 25 Phase I are Engineers, ~if soils eagiaeer foundations, from the as follows: a. Re~olving utility easements; b. Obtaining a wetlands permit required. c~ Providing a soils report from $ registered indicating which lots may require engineered and placing an appropriate n,ote on the plat. d. Resolving drainage and drainag~ e~sements with Corps of having Public Works Engineering. e. Resolving tile need for footing footing drain stubouts with Public Works Engineering. f. Providing a soils, sedimentation, and erosioa control plan prior to'plat recording. This condition may be required by the below referenced subdivision agreement in lieu of being a condition that must be satisfied prior to plat approval. g. Removing the well from the right-of-way or the right-of-way outside the well location. h. Resolving the need for any temporary turnarounds with Public Works Engineering. i. Resolving the location of the intersection of Northfield Drive and Pickett Street with Public Works j. Entering into a subdivision agreement for: (1) Creation of Appellant's Community Water drains, and ~ystem. (2) Subdivision agreemeat to construct all ieherzor standards. ~a ]1 (3) Northfield Drive to subarban access taadards from the subdivision to Rabbit Creek Road (strip aving oaly); 6. ~lat shall issue and which shall be ~hase II are as follows: a. Completion of inclusive as set forth ia Paragraph 5 above. b.' Installing the under drain The specific conditions under which a preliminary successfully completed for conditious a through j, system and 3 I bereb',2~'~~ envy' 05 tbt' monitoring that under drain system for a period of 24 months with final resolution from. the Departments of Health and Public Works to determine the effectiveness of the under drain system and the ability of each of the 13 lots subject to this condition to function with an on-site septic system. 7. The monitoring requirement as set fo~:th in Paragraph 6 above shall be a requirement for the 13 lots of Phase II only. Because the monitoring must extend over a 24 month ~eriod, it will be impossible to make application for final plat pproval within the normal 18 month period. As such, the time or final plat approval shall be extended to 30 months for ompletion of the Phase II conditions and application for final olat approval. 8. The preliminary plat shall issue to Rexford L. 'urner, successor to Bridger Enterprises. 9. The Appellant shall be free to m~ ~on to ~he Court for attorney fee~ as the preva DATED this ~0 day of EY )r Court Judge ;atAnchorag~ By; Date/ ~ceived a copy of ~is ~nt on the ~--~-- day 7" , 1985. ~S CRARY ~ t Municipal Attor~