HomeMy WebLinkAboutMANN #2 Soils Information
,!
R&M
Civil Engineers
ENGli'""E!RING & GEOLOGICA' CONSULTANTS
229 EAST 5~st. AVE. - P.O. BOX 608'1 - ANCIIORAGt:, ALASKA 99503
'[ELEf'HONE 907-279-0483 TELEX 090-35419
Geologists Land Surveyors
· ,~ALCOLM A. MENZIE$, P.E,, L.S. '~f
~AMES H. WELLMAN, P.E,
Augus~ 17, 1972
]V[r. Arthur l~lann
Loretta Street
Anchorage, Alaska
RE:
Subsurface So{1 Investlgat{on (For Sanitary System) Proposed
Subdivision at 163rd Avenue and Golden View Drive
RALPH Fl. MIGLIACCIO
Dear Mr. Manta
We are subm{.tt{ng herewith our test boring results and comments re-
gardlng so-il conditions encountered at ~he subject site. This investi-
gation Was performed {n accordance with your verbal request. The
procedures utilize J, in this investigation were directed to identifying
soil characterJstic 3 in accordance with those requirements out:lined
in a letter da~ed September 13, 1971 [Tom Mr. Roll Strickland of the
Greater Anchor~i~ Area Borough, Department o.~ Environmental
Quali .
A total of four (4) -~e'st holes were put down withL~ the platted area
for the purpose of defining general subsurface so~J. conditions. The
boring locations are shown on Drawing A-01 and their locations~are
approximate only. The boring locations were selected for the purpose
of defining major soil unil~s.
Drilling was performed with a erack-mounted "~gobil B-50" hydraulic
drilling unit employing 6 inch diameter solid-stem augers. Samples
were recovered from representative strata and retained for labora-
tory testing. Final logs for the 'test borings have been prepared and
are ~cluded on Drawing A-02. Grain size analysis curves for selected
samples have also been plotted and are shown on ]Drawing A-03.
The general-topography and geology indicates that the g-round s~trface
slopes to the northwest and borders swamp deposits described by
Aqlller and Dobrovolny in Geological S,~trvey Bulletin 1093. The south-
eastern port:ion o~ the property lies within the lateral moraine area
also desceibed {n ~be above-mentioned bulletin. Large surface exposed
botflders were prevalent in the area,
ANCIIOI~AGE FAIHI]ANK$ JUNEAU
August 17, 1972
Mr. Arthur Mann
]Page 2
Test Holes Number 1 and 2 located at the common boundaries of Lots
7 and 8 and 5 and 6, respectively, showed peat extending to a depth
of about 3 feet underlain by medium dense granular deposits. It was
not poss/ble to detez~nine a depth t:o a hydrostatic water table as the
per-~h-~ ~vater table in the peat s~ratum caused floodzng of the holes.
Test Hole Number 4 was found to have about 1.5 fees of peat and a
similar perched water table conditions. Test Hole Number 3 showed
about 5 feet off peat and ',vas located at a low point on the boundary be-
tween lots 3 and 4.
Underlying the organic material in all test holes was a thin layer (up
to 2 feet tkick) of silty sand which extended to depths ranging frcom
3.5 to 6.5 feet below ground surface. At these depths a !ight brown
go gray silty or gravelly sand (SA{) was encountered and continued to
the bottom of aD borings except T.H. 1 where a sandy silt (ML) was
found below a depth of ten feet. The borings were term{hated at
depths of £~rom 15 to 17.5 feet below ground surface.
We appreciate being g; ~en this opportunity to be of service to you.
Should you have arq/~uestions with regard to the above information,
please do not hesitz e to contact us.
Very truly yours,
R & M ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
Jamer W. Rooney /
Soil Engineer
JWR:wb
R&M ENGINEI~RING & GEOLOGICAL CONSULIANTS
p-
W
0~
162nd AVENUE
LOT NUMBERS
"~ T,H-$
I
Cll,~ I
~l I
LOT NUMBERS
163 rd AVENUE
8
ILl
~'~
.J
0
Note: Locations of test holes are approx.j (]nd hove not been surveyed,
Proposed Subdivision Development
Authur Mann Properi'y
LOCATION OF BORINGS
Anchordge Alask(~
T.H.-I T.H.- 2
8-15.~72 B-[5-72
0,0'
ORGANIC MATERIAL ( PEAT)
WD
$,0' AB
SILT W/SOME SAND~ Light Brown
4.0'
'SANDY~GRAVgi.~ /S ~ /!~'
Dense ~
10.O'
SANDT SILT TRACE GRAVF. L
ML
T.D
O.O'
ORGANIC MATERIAL (PEAT)
SILTY SAND, Light Brown
SOME SILT
~SM
17.5'
~D~AB
T.H.- .~
8-15-72
ORGANIC MAT ERI/,L t PEAT)
AB
¸SM
SIL'FY SAND W/SOME
PEBf'3LES , Light Brow'~
SILTY SAND
T.H.-4
8-15-72
SM
ORGANIC MATERIAL (PEAT)
,SAND W/SOME PEBBLES
TO SO.M~ SILT
0.0'
¢.~ [Engineering f~ Geological Consulta¢¢~
J-%CAL.EJ" '- 5' [
Ti;: 8'-IG-72 DWIJ mY GAW
Proposed Subdivision Development
Authur Mann Property
I_OGo OF' TEST BORINGS
Anchorage Alaska
SOI Lz;
CLA$SIF[CATION~ CONSISTENCY AND SYMBOLS
CI.At;';II'IC..\TION: Identification and classification of the soil is accomplished in
acctrd,mcu ~..'it]~ the Unified So{1 Classification System. Normally, the gra~ size
di~,[ributi~,:~ dutermines class~ication of the soil. '~e soft is defied accord~g to
major and minor constituents with the m~or elements serv~g as mod{fiefs o~ the
ma}or element~;. For cohesive soils, the clay becomes ~he princ~alnoun wi~h the
o~her major so{1 constituents used as modifier; i.e. sH~ clay, when the clay particles
are such tha~ the clay dom~a~es soil properties. M~or soil constituents may be
,tdded to t}w cla~s[ficationbreakdown ~ accordance with the particle size proportion
listed below; i.e. sandy silt w/some gravel, trace clay.
no c~l - 0 - 3% trace - 3 -- 12% some - 13 - 30~
SOIL CONSISTENCY- CRITERIA: Soil consistency as defined below and determined
hy normal field and laboratory methods applies only to non-frozen mater{al. For
these materkals, the influence of such factors as soil structure, i.e. fissure
systems, shrh~kaEe cracks, sl{ckens{des, etc., must be taken intocons{deration
in making any correlat{onw{th the consistency values listed below. In permafrost
zones, the consistency and strength of frozen soils may vary significantly and
une>~lamablywith ice content, thermal regime and soil type.
Cohesionless Cohesive
N*.Olows,'ft~ qelative D~.nsity
Loose 0- 10
,Medium Dense 10- 30
Dense 30- 60
Very Dense - 60
*Standard Penetration "iq":
0 to 40%
40 to 70%
70 to 90%
90 to 100%
Blows per foot of
a 1.10-pound hammer falling 30 inches on a
2-inch OD split-spoon except where noted.
T- (tsf)
Very Soft
Soft
Stiff
Firm
Very Firm
Hard
0 - 0.25
0.25 - 0.5
0.5 -I.0
1.0 -2.0
2.0 -4.0
-4.0
DRILLING S~f MB OLS
WO: Wash Out WD:
WL: Water Level BCR:
WCI: Wet Cave In ACR:
DCI: Dry Cave In AB:
WS: WhLle Sampling 'TD:
While DriLling
Before Casing Removal
After Casing Removal
After Boring
Total Depth
Note: Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured {n the
boring at the times indicated. In pervious unfrozen so/Is, the indicated elevations
are considered to represent actual ground water co~[ditJons. In hnpervious and
frozen soils, accurate determ{nations of ground water elew~tions cannot be obtained
within a l{mited period of observation and other evidence on ground water elevations
and conditions are required..
GENERAL FIOTES
Ot. i3 ]/,t-~oa ,',~o GENI-_R,,Ll [r~o NO.
q .01
STANDARD SYMBOLS
, [~_'.~.~ ORGANIC N?~TERIAL ~
COBBLES G BOULDERS
CONGLOMERATE
MUDSTONE
IIMESTONE
IGNEOUS ROCK
METAMORPHIC ROCK
ICE, MASSIVE
ICE -SILT
ORGANIC SILT
SANDY SILT
SILT GRADING TO
SANDY SILT
SANDY GRAVEL,
SCATTERED COBBLES
(ROCK FRAGMENTS)
INTERLAYERED SAND
Il SANDY GRAVEL
SILTY CLAY w/TR. SAND
Si ..... 1.4" SPLIT SPOON
Ss ..... 1.4" SPLIT SPOON
SI ..... 2.5" SPLIT SPOON
Sh ..... 2.5" SPLIT SPOON
Sx ..... 2.0" SPLIT SPOON
Sz ..... L4" SPLIT SPOON
Ap ..... 2.5" SPLIT SPOON,
Hs ..... 1.4" SPLIT SPOON
HI ..... 2,5" SPLIT SPOON
SAMPLER TYPE SYMBOLS
WITH 47-//' HAMMER
WITH 140 ¢/-~ HAMMER
WITH 140-f~ HAMMER
WITH 340¢¢ HAMMER
WITH 140-/~ HAN',MER
WITH 340/~ H,:~MMER
PUSHED
DRIVEN WITH AIR HAMMER
DRIVEN WITH AIR HAMMER
NOTE:
Ts .... SHELBY TUBE
Tm .... MODIFIED SHELBY TUBE
Pb, ,-, , PITCHER BARREL
Cs .... CORE BARREL WITH SINGLE TUBE
Cd .... CORE BARREL ~VITH DOUBLE TUBE
Bs .... BULK SA~,~PLE
A ..... AUGER SAMPLE
G ..... GRAB SAMPLE
SAMPLER TYPES ARE EITHER NOTED ABOVE THE BORING LOG OR ADJACENT TO IT AT THE RESPECTIVE'
SAMPLE DEPTH.
TYPICAL BORING LOG
BORING NU,4.ABE, e-.,~..E. H. 30-15 Elev. ~74.6 .,...-- ELEVA?/ON IN FEET'
DAZE DH/LLEO-~,iO_21_70 All Scruples Ss
;~'~ ORGANIC MATERI~L O'
. ~ ~ ...... ICE+NIL
SJMPLER TFPE~ ~~mate 65% Wsible Ice
SANDY SILl'
~/.APPt~OXIM47'E ST,~AT4 CHANGE
LiHle to NoVJsible Ice 13'-50' Vx ~--IC~, DESCRIPTION ~ CL~SSIFICARON
72, 5TI °/o, 85.Bpcf, 28~ GP (CO~PS OF ENG/H~S METHOD/
~ ~ ~ ~. ~UA/IF/ED O~ F~A CLaSSIFICaTION
~ ~ · -- ~nY DENSITY
~--~TEn C~TENT
BLO;FS/~QOT
SANDY GRAVEL
SCHIST ~-~ GEN~}ZALIZED BOIL O~ ROCi¢
~ S4MPLE &O~4T/O,V ~0' '~ DH/LA DEPTH
'>~ V/O, - WHILE U/F/L!.I/VG~ A £?-IFTE,~ BOF?IVG
Englnee, r{ng /.& Geological Consultmmts
EXPLANATION OF SELECTED SYMBOLS
'I F f
',I:: 2.-IG-'72 Jsc;t ¢' NONE PWN E~' L_I)S c}~,[; aY OL'B ,p!<~J No. GENERAL ii~,vm NO. B-02
August 23, 1972
Dickinson-Oswald & Partners
~00 Cordova Street
Anchorage, Ala,~ka 99501
Attention; fqrs. Jo Frankfourth
Subject: i~ann Subdivision, Addi~io~l #2
Dear Hrs. Frankfourth:
Tnt:. Greater Anchorage Area tJorou.gil, ~,}epart;men~ o'F Environt~i{~ntal
qua~i~y is 'iii receipt of '~he platt o'F ti~e subjccg subdivision.
After reviuu of our l"ilc.:~, ue find soils information ~-¢ill be
necessary along ,,.~-iCil the location of all individual sm.~er and
~,~a~e.r sys~;ems on eaci, lot 'in this propos~:d :;ubdivision.
Si~ould you nave any questions regarding 'ghis mac,er, please
con'Cac& the undersigned.
Sincerely,
Roll Strickland, R.S.
Chief Sanitarian
cc: Alan Scheel~, Planning Department
Au(just
Sui)jecL: rlai~n SLIL'div'isian~ AddiLion #2.
Sinc~'r,'~ly :,
.)c rvi cus
Environm(.~)~al ~' ~ Suj)ervisor
bo
229 [~AS'F 51st. AXLE. P.O. b 3,, 0U87 ANCI-tOIbrXGR, ALASKA 99503
'I'ELEPHONE 907-279--0:~83 TELEX 090--35419
C/vi! E;L,7inears Geologists La¢;d Surveyors
JAbI~S W. ROO~qEY, ?. ~:. HALPH ~. MIGLIACCIO
M,',I_COLh'~ A. b~ENZIES, P.E., L,S, Engi~eerino Geologist
.J/NM, ES H. W;~LLM,,NN, P.E.
Sept:er~ber 9, ].972 }Z & N[ No, 25'i2i
lV[r. ~/[aurice Oswald
Dictdnson Oswald & Partners
P, O, Box 326
Anchorage, Alaska
Stfbsurface Soil Inveshi~aP. ion (For Sa~ary System) Proposed Sub-
division ah ~63rd Avenue and Golden View Drive, Addendum Le'h~er
Dear Nit. Oswald:
In response 'ho your request, we are submi'h~ing our in~erpre'ha-hion o~ sur-
f:ace area (square foot/bedroom) requirements ~or placemen'b of seepage
pits in ~he soils encountered a~ subjec~ site. The ~ollowing tabula'~ion o~
values is based on hhe assumed influence of -the high percentage of gravel
contalned in-khe respective soils.
Test Hole DejThh Soil Type_ ~_q_: Feet/Bedrm
4-10 Silly Sandy Gz~avel (GM-SM) 200
10-17.5 Sandy Silt (S]\~-ML) 250
3. S-!7.5 Gravel Sand (GM-SM) 200
6.5-15 Silty Sand w/gravel (G~I-ST~%) 200
3.5-!5 Grave]. Sand (GM-SN[) 200
The Unified Soil Classi£~cation symbols nohed on the b'oring logs in our re-
por-h Drawing A--02 represent a strict interpretation of: 'the so:il classifi-
cation un{ts lis'~ed on the c'harb provided by -the Greater Anchorage Area
Borough, Depar[menh of: Enviromnent¢.tl Quality. Because of: the border-
line gradation of the ma'herial, we feel the above 1UM:ed values provide ~
moz'e :t'ealis~ic :irepresentaUton of in sJbtt conditions.
We resrei: a23y :inconvenience we may have caused and hope [:he above
Se}}~:ernber 9, 1972
}x/_rr. 0 swal. d
Pa%~e 2
r~a'b.'[o~! w~!~=~..v,.'~r o %0 d. ari:F_y your questions re~a:c'din~ so:U. classJ~cahion
and seepa~'e pN:
ShouJ. d other ques'k:[ons arise, please lei: us
Very i;ruly yours,
R & IV[ ENG!NEEt{NG & GEOLOGICAL CONSUI.,'PANTS
~ James ~. Rooney
JWR:wb
xe: Mr. Arkh~
0 o o
o o o
o o o o o o o o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Civil lTngfi~sers
ll,l(:,, &GEOI. OGIC/ CONoUL AN]S
· 229 E .... s~st. AVe.---P.O. BOX 6087 - ANCHOFb, , ALASI(A 99503
TEL. EPHONE 907-279-0183 '1ELEX 090--35419
Geologists Land Surveyors
JAMES W. FIOONFY, P. E.
MALCOLh'~ A. MENZIES, P.E., L.S,
JAMES II, W~LLMAN, P,E.
RALPtl ,q. MIGLIACCIO
Englne~rin9 G oologh,[
October 18, ].972
R & M No. 25121
Mr, AiaurJce Oswald, Partner
Anchorage, Alaska
Re: Proposed Subdivision Development, Arthur ~ann Property, Perched
Water Conditions
Dear Mr, Oswald:.
At Mr. Mann's request we have reviewed site cond{tions and at'kemp-ted to evaluate
perched ground water levels ~ollowing completion o~ the drainage ditch excavations.
A gener~ map showing the approximate locakion and drainage paths flor the various
ditches is attached.
.Hand probes were made at selected locations on October 2, 1972 immediately a.f. ter
comp].ebion of. ~he ditcking operations to veri£2z 'the level o~ perched water, A
cond inspection was made on October 17, 1972 to £ur~her review 'the present state
o~ site drainage.
In general, it appears ~hat the excavated ditch sections will allow sufficien8 drain-
age and eventual c].iminaSion of. the perched water table found in the peat overburden
~hroughou~ much o~ the siSe. Due to recen~ wet and rainy conditions, it was not
possible 8o ascertain whether a significant change in the water level had occurred
over this short period, however, it is our £eeling that 'the provisions taken to
hance drainage wJ]2 be e~fective. Because of the variation in relief., we expect ·
that t'he hlgher ].o~s will drain ah a more rapid rate, Drainage of the lower sec~lons
should be anticipated to occttr at a somewha~ slower ra~e.
It is hoped the above in~orraa~ion'serves to iden~i£-y the state of presen~ perched
ground ~va'ter and drainage conditions. Sho¢tld you have any quest{mm please let
me know.
Very tr~tly yours,
James W. Rooney
JWR:~,b
,"cc: A~cthLlr ~ann '
ANCHORAGE~ 'FAIRBANKS JUNEAU
LOT MUMMERS
T.H =5
Continues 200' Past,
LOT NUMBERS
8
T, It.-2
Note: Locations of tesl holes r~re epprox..and have not been survayed.
~ ~ngineoring ~ Geological
0..-16-Y2
Proposed Subdivision
Au )hur Man n
LOCAT1 ON OF
A ~choraga
Development
Proparfy
BORINGS
Alask¢~
[ PROa, NO. 25121 ew.a ~,;.:). ,',
I0 "18-7~ A d .:J '¢' d r,)r..l~'n,,,, -,.,.¢u D i ,t.,c h es
R&M
ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAl. CONSULTANTS
22g EAST 51st. AVE. - P.O. BOX 608? - ANCHORAGE, ALASKA g9503
TELEPHONE 907--279-0483 TELEX 090-35419
Civil Engineers Geologists Land Surveyors
JAMES W, ROONEY, P, E.
MALCOLM A, MENZIES, P,E,, L.S,~
JAMES H. WELLMAN, P,E.
Septeraber 5, 1973
R &MNo. 25121
RALPH R, MIGLIACClO
Engineering Geologist.
Mr. Arthur Mann
Loretta Street
Anchorage, Al<
Re:
Subdivision Development, Arthur Mann Property, Perched Groundwater
C onditions
Dea:¢ A'Lr. Mann:
At your request we have reviewed the perched groundwater level corditi~s
since the eleven months have elapsed following completion o~] site drainage
ditch excavations and initial probing on October 2, 1972. Hand probes were
performed on August 30, 1973 at approxirmtely the same locations o~ the
original probes to ascertain the present level o~ the perched water. Typically,
only a very small amount o{z perched water was found to be present and in sonde
instances water was absent.
In Eeneral, it appears that the excavated ditch sections have allowed drainaEe o~
the perched water table ~ound in the peat overburden throuEhout much o~ the site°
Due to recent wet and rainy conditions, it was not possible to determine the
max{raum extent o~ drainaEe that has occurred in the peat since a certain amount
o~ water is retained in the peat. It ~s our bel{e~ that the present remainin~
apparent perched water is due to the inherent spenEe-l~ke nature oJ~ the overlyin~
orEan~c mat and the peat to absorb-: and retain incident rainfall.
Based on conditions observed at the site, results oJ~ a recent test pit excavation
and the low soil moisture contents noted in our original report, it ~s our J~eelin~
that, in general, the perched or surJ]ace groundwater condition has been adequately
alleviated. Surt:ace runof-~ from above the s~te i~ presently ~ntercepted by the
dit~ch system and the collected water is directed to a small stream at the lower
end oJ] the site.
It is hoped that the above additional in~ormat-lon serves to clarify any remaiuing
questions on perched groundwater and drainage conditions at the site° Should you
have any f-o_vther questions please let me know.
Very truly yours, "
R & ]VI ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
Pa.~neA:~CHORAGE '
FAIRBANKS
JUNEAU