No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHIDEAWAY HILLS BLK 1 LT 1A00 , 2(,,2 oI GAAB-HD-I G,I'~.~,rER ANCHORAGE AREA BORO~ ~ ~EPAFITMEI~T OF EBIVIBOBII~IEBITAL 0.UALIT~'~: 3§00 TUDOR ROAD ANC;HObAGE, ALASKA gg§07 27g-8§88 INSPECTION REPORT ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 333 " MAILING NAME ~'~/____~//~_,,d~Z..~ ("?~.~:~?J""..,7~ ~.~'~', ADDRESS ~~ ~~ PHONE LOCATION ~.~/~/~~U~t~GAL DESCRIPTION ~T~ g~. ~f~j/~m~ SEPTIC TANK: NUMBER OF DISTANCE FROM WELL '~',/~' ~-~'' /z~,_~ MATERIAl .~.,'~--~ COMPARTMENTS LIQUID CAPACITY -/~'~ GALLONS. INSIDE LENGTH / INSIDE WIDTH SEEPAGE SYSTEM: SEEPAGE PIT: NUMBER OF PITS // OUTSIDE DIAMETER / OR WIDTH ~--=~"'--',:~' , LENGTH '---'~"~'/ , DEPTH ~ LINING MATERIAL ~ ~-~,~'/~-~ . DISTANCE FROM WELl ~'/--~' /~'~ , BUILDING FOUNDATION NEAREST LOT LINE ~2 ~ TOTAL EFFECTIVE ABSORPTION AREA (WALL AREA) .Y//~' sq. FT, TILE DRAIN FIELD: DISTANCE FROM WELL ~J~O~JNDATION NUMBER OF LINES_ ~DISTANCE BETWEEN LINES ABSORPTI(~NI,~EA. SQ. FT. LENGTH OF EACH LINE DEPTH: TOP OF TILE TO FINISH GRADE TOTAL LENGTH , NEAREST LOT LINE OF LINES TRENCH WIDTH IN. TOTAL EFFECTIVE · DEPTH OF FILTER MATERIAL BENEATH TILE IN. ABOVE TILE ~-,~g~J~ /~J'~' DISTANCE FROM WATER WELL: TYPE ~/~=~ , DEPTH ~ , BUILDING FOUNDATION. ~ SAMPLE ~ , NEAREST NEAREST SEPTIC SEEPAGE OTHER LOT LINE / , SEWER LINE. ~ ,TANK ~, SYSTEM ~ , CESSPOOL ~ SOURCES DISTANCES: DIAGRAM OF SYSTEM G.A.A.B. PERMIT NO. ( 790410 ) FIF'F'I_ICRNT DFIVE NAYLOR LEft':AT I ON MLIL[:,C]ON LEGAL L.i B:t HIDEAWAY DEPARTMENT OF HERLTH AND ENVZRONMENTRL. PROTECTZON 825 "L" STREET, ANCHORAGE, AK. 9950:t 264-4720 ~26 E. 72ND LOT SIZE ~44 29!i ±4250 SQUARE FEET .TYPE OF SOIl.. RBSORBTION SYSTEM IS: TRENCH MRXIMUM NUMBER OF BEDROOMS = 4 SOIL RATING (SQ FT/E:R)= 225 THE REQUIRED SIZE OF THE SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM IS: THE LENGTH DIMENSION IS TFIE LENGTH (IN FEE7'::, OF THE TRENCH OR DRAINF'IEL.[:,. THE DEPTH OF A 'TRENCH OR PIT IS THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE SURFACE OF 7'HE GROUND AND THE BOTTOM OF THE E',:.:',CFIVATION (IN FEET). THERE IS NO SET WI[:,TH FOR TRENCHES. THE GRAVEL DEPTH IS THE MINIMUM DEF'TH OF GRAVEL BETWEEN THE OUTFRLL PIPE'"_ AND THE BOTTOM OF THE EXCFIVRTION (IN FEET). PERMIT APPLICANT HAS 'THE RESPONSIBILITY 'TO INFORM 'FH!S DEPARTMENT DURING THE INSTALLATION INSPECTIONS OF ANY WELLS ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERT'Y' FIND THE NUMBER OF RESIDENCES THA'F THE WELL WILL ~ER',,,'E. E:RCKFILLING OF ANY SYSTEM WITHOUT FINAL INSPECTION AN[:, RF'F'ROVRL E:Y THIS DEF'ARTMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO F'ROSECLITION. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN A WELL. AND RNY ON--SITE SENRGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS 100 FEET FOR A PRIVATE HELL..~ OR ±50 TO 2F10 FEET FROM R PUBLIC WELL DEPENDING UPON THE T'¢PE OF PL.IBLIC WELL OTHER REQUIREMENTS f'lA'z' APPL."r'. SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAMS ARE AVRILABLE TO INSURE PROPER INSTALLATION. I CERTIFY THAT i: I RM FAMILIAR WITH TFIE REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE SEWERS AND WELLS RS SET FORTFI BY THE MUNICIPRLIT'¢ OF ANCHORAGE. 2: I WILL INSTALL THE SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODES. _-.-':: t UNDERSTAND THAT THE JN-=,ITE SEWER SYSTEM MAY RE6~UIR. E ENLARGEMENT IF THE RESIDENCE IS R~DELED TO ~CLUDE MORE THAN 4 BEDROOMS. greA~ER ANCHORAge AREA BO~d!Ugh DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 3500 TUDOR ROAD POUCH 6-650 ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99502 TELEPHONE 279-8685 SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM -- APPLICATION AND PERMIT PERMIT NO. INSTALLATION OF: SEPTIC TANK TYPE AND SIZE OF FACILITY TO BE SERVED FINANCed THROUGH SOIL TEST RESULTS SEEPAGE PIT /~ ' DRAIN FIELD , OTHER ~'~_ '-;;.,,.? t; /~',, 19 NOTE.' THIS PERMIT IS COMPLETION DATE ANTICIPATED FINAL INSPECTION,' ~:4 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED. BACKFILLING OF ANY SYSTEM WITHOUT FINAL iNSFECTION BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT AUTHORITY WILL BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. MINIMUM DISTANCES, REQUIREMENTS FOUNDATION TO SEPTIC TANK FOUNDATION TO SEEPAGE Plt SEPTIC TANK TO SEEPAGE Pit WALL SEPTIC TANK ~ ,SEEPAGE PIt TO NEAREST LOT Line. DRAIN FIELD WATER MAIN TO SEPTIC TANK DRAIN FIELD SEPTIC TANK, '~/ ~' / , SEEPAGE PIt TO RIVER, LAKE STREAM. DRAIN FIELD DRAIN FIELD SEEPAGE PIT ALSO CONSIDER AREA WELLS. . SEEPAGE PiT / ' DRAIN FIELD CA. ST~[RON INTO AND OUT OF SEPTIC TANK AND INTO CRIB CROSSING GAP Of E~CAVATION 5 FEE~ l~TO UNDISTURBED SOil. 4 INCH DIAMETER CAST IRON SIPHON PIPES ON SEPTIG TANK AND SEEPAGE PIT FITTED WITH AIRTIGHT REMOVABLE CAPS. GRAVEL BACKFILL CONFORM TO BOROUGH REGULATIONS REGARDINg INSTALLATION. HEALTH ~A~R HORITY LICENSED DESIGNER DIAGRAM OF SYSTEM ] CERTIFY THAT I AM FAMILIAR With THE REQUIREMENTS OF GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH ORDINANCE NO. 28-68 AND THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SYSTEM IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID CODE. DATE 7/Z 7/? I APP -,CANT'S SIGNATURe------/~Y>'- ':X' / . - . / S25 "L" S'~' Fq L-- ET /',.NCi~OF?AGE, ALASKA 99501 :,~',rT?) 264-411 i December 31, 1979 Dave Naylor 3126 East 72 Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Permit 9 790410 Subject: Lot 1 Block 1 Hideaway Hills Subdivision A permit issued by this department for well and/or sewer system has expired. Permits are issued on a calendar year basis, as stated on the permit, by authority of Municipal ordinance. If you have drilled the well, a well log should be sent to this department to document the installation date. If an engineer has inspected the installation of the on-site sewer system, please have them send us the as-builts for our files. If there are any further questions, please contact this office at 264-4720. LNB/ljw enc: Copy of Permit t : ~ ~OILS LpG MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE [] PERCOLATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TEST Pouch 6-550, Anchorage, Alaska 99502 276-222~ SOILS LOG- PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED FOR: Dave ?~aylor DATE PERFORMED: 7/24/79 LEGAL OESCmPTmN: Lot 1, Block 1, Hideaway Sub-Division 8 9 10- 11 12 13 - 14} ~8- 20- COMMENTS PERFORMED BY: Roots, Moss, Etc. SLOPE SITE PLAN Inorgsmic Silt USCS "ML" ~ercolation Test Silty, clayey gravel with sand lenses 18" to 24' apart USCS .... BgM .......... Test Rain continued Bill Schachle WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? Gross Net Depth_t~O T' Net Reading Date Time Time Water Drop 7: L,"5 7/24 0 0 9½" 0 8=15 " 30 Min. 30 Min. 8" 1~-" 8:45 " 1 Hr. 30 ?;~in. 6½" 1½" 9:15 " 1~, Hr. 30 ~iin. 5~" 1~" 9:45 " 2 Hr. 30 ~'~iin. 4~" 1" 10:1.5 " 2~r Hr. 30 Min, 4" ~" 10:15 " 2½ Hr. 0 9½" 0 10:45 " 3 Hr. 30 Min.. 8~" 1~" 11: 15 " 3½Hr. 30 Min. 7" 1.~" 11:45 " 4 Hr. 30 Min. 5~3/4 1~." PERCOLATION RATE ~4 (minutes/inch) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4 , FT AND ~ FT -preceded by 3-4 days of moderate to heavy rain during entire test period CERTIFIED BYe:, ....~ ~ .' David J.~arman, P.E. 7/24/79 72-008 (7/76) ANCHORAGEi ALASKA April 13, 1972 W. O. 12399 Clemmer Construction Co., Inc. P. O. Box' 4-301 Anchor'age, Alaska ATTENTION: Mr. C1 emmet SUBJECT: Soils; Lot lA, Block 1, Hideaway Hills Gentlemen: In response to your request, a test hole was placed 20 feet east of the southwest corner on the south side of the house. The test hole-was five feet from the wall. lhe materials encountered were as follows: Depth in Feet from to 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 10.0 Bottom of hole: Frost line: Free water 'level: Soil Description NFS/F1, grey, well graded sandy gravel (with _~cobbles on surface), medium density, wet, GW (fill) ' F2, grey, well graded si.l.t$ sandy gravel, damp, 1"-, GM, medium density, trace of twigs (bel'i'eved to be fill) F4, grey grave!,ly sandy silt, damp, stiff, non plastic,' 1 - (probably natural formation) 10' 1' none observed The test hole was placed with a Mobile B-50 drill fitted with a · hollow-stem auger; samples were taken ai~ 1', 5', 6'~', and 10' The'soils were examined in the field by an experienced tech- nician and an appraisal of the soils' density/consistency was formulated. ~ Clemmer Const. ~. 2 ~? 4/.13/72 Based on this information, it is my opinion that the soils used to found the structure are satisfactory with respect to bearing provided the structure remains heated during the winter (this is a standard recommendation). We suggest that' area fine grading include a surface seal of silt (top soil) about the structure to minimize melt water from entering the disturbed soil mass about the footings (this is a standard recommendati on). We trust the foregoing is sufficient to your present needs. Very ~"" ~'" rs ~.~ ,~ yOU ~ ALASKA TESTLAB Harry ~R. Lee 'Laboratory Manager HRL:ld FHA For~j 2573 ~ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOP~dENT~.~ Form Approved Rev. )uly'1958 Budget Bureau No. 63-R0296 ~, ~ FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL INDIVIDUAL WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PART I.=tO BE COMPLETED BY FHA INSURING OFFICE MORTGAGEE SERIAL NO. Anchorage Horrts R. Clemmel' MORTGAGOR OR SPONSOR PROPERTY ADDRESS Ftrst Nattonal Bank 2664 Seclusion Drive SUBDIVISION NAME BL~CK NO. J LOT NO, Hideaway Hills 1J 1 TOTAL NUMBER: Can attic or other urea be made into BASEMENT [] New instal]at]on additional bedrooms? (If Yes, how rnany~) 1 4 I--I Yes Fa.No []Yes WAT~N SUPPLY BY: J SYSTEM DESIONED FOR ~] Public system F'-] Community system J--] IndividualI.o. oF ,o,~s oA.,,,a, D,s,os^t SEWAGE DISPOSAL BY: [] Public system [] Community system [] Individual 8,. [] Yes [] No PART IL--TO BE COMPLETED BY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR'S SKETCH _=.=::=! ZZZ~=- It is the opinion of the [] State [--] County [~] Local Department of Health that this individual water-supply system I~ is [] is not satisfactory as a domestic water supply for the subiect pr0perry. Publ tC Water' of the [~1 State [] County [] Local Department of Health that this individual It is the opinion sewage-disposal tern with proper maintenance: 1~] Can be expected to function satisfactorily, and [] Cannot be expected to function satisfactorily is nor likely to create an insanitary condition TATE SIGNATURE __.,~ ./? J TITLE ~ov. 9. 1971 .../"' .,r-.~ (f.:' <~ _~... ;']Envir°nmental Specialist spaces provided. health authority. PART III.~FOR USE OF FHA OFFICE TO THE CHIEF UNDERWRITER: I have reviewed the foregoing and the pertinent FHA Compliance Inspection Report, and recommend that the Individual water-supply system be considered [-'] Acceptable [--] Not Acceptable Sewage disposal be considered ['-] Acceptable [] Not Acceptable. DATE SIGNATURE r~J CHIEF ARCHITECT HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL INDIVIDUAL WATIR SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM FHA Farm 2573 Rev, July 19S8 REPORT OF INSPECTION--INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE-DISPOSAL SYSTEM PRIMARY TREATMENT consists of [] Septic tank. [] Cesspool. Septic Tank; Distance from well,__feet. Material,. Total liquid capacity, Inside length, feet. Inside width, Ce~apool: Distance ftom: Well, feet; foundation, Inside diameter, feet. Depth, SECONDARY TREATMENT cnnsists of ~ Tile disposal field. ~ Seepage pits. Other Til~' Disposal Field: Distance from: Well, Total length of tile lines, Trench width Length of each line, Number of compartments gallons. gallons. Capacity inlet compartment, t~et. Liquid depth, feet. feet; oearest lot line at [] front, [] side, [] tear,_ feet. Liquid capacity, gallons. Lining material feet. .square feet. .inches, feet; foundation, feet; nearest lot line at [] front, [] side, [] rear,.__ feet. Number of lines,__ Distance between lines, inches. Total effective absorption area in bottom of trenches feet. Depth, top of tile to finish grade, Type of filter material: [] Gravel. [] Broken stone. Other Depth of filter material beneath tile,~ inches. Depth of filter material over tile, S~epage Plt~: Number of pits ..... Outside diameter, feet. Depth, Distance from: Well, feet; building foundation,__ Inspection made by: [] State. Date of inspe(tion inches. feet. Lining material feet; nearest lot line at [] front, [] side, [] rear, [] County. [] Local Health Authority. Inspected by. 19 ITITL[) REPORT OF INSPECTION--INDIVIDUAL WATER-SUPPLY SYSTEM Distance to nearest public water main feet. Size of main, inches. Individual wells [] are [] are not customary in neighbgrbot~d. Give most recent record of failure of wells in immediate vicinity to furnish adequate supply of water Properties in neighborhood [] are [] are not being developed with both individual water-supply and sewage-disposal systems. Lot size' feet wide,_ feet deep. Dwelling set back from front property line,, feet. Individual water supply from: [] Drilled well. [] Driven well. [] Dug well. [] Bored well. Distance of well from: Bnilding foundation seepage pit, Well carlst ~uctJan: feet; tile sewer, feet; cesspool,. feet; nearest lot line at [] front, [] side, [] rear, t;eet; septic tank. feet; disposal field, feet; other sources of possible pollution, Diameter. .inches. Total depth, feet. Type of casing Approximate depth to pumping level of water in well,, feet. Approximate yield, Sealed watertight to depth of feet. Exterior space around casing sealed with: [] Cement grout. [] Puddled clay. [] Ordinary backfill. Well cover: [] Concrete. [] Wood. [] Metal. Openings in well cover watertight: [] Yes. [] No. Pump: [] Shallow well. [] Deep well. Length of drop pipe, feet. Pump capacity, Ix)cared in: [] Basement. [] Pumproom off basement. [] Pumphouse above ground. [] Pump pit. Pumproom properly drained: [] Yes. [] No. Pump mounting watertight: [] Yes. [] No. Typ~ of storage: [] Pressure. [] Gravity. Capacity,. .gallons. Has bacteriological examination of water been made? [] Yes, [] No. If answer is "yes," give date Quality of water [] is [] is not satisfactory for human consumption, lnstallaiion [] does [] does not comply with approved exhibits, if any. Inspection made by: [] State. [] County. [] Loc'al Health Authority. Inspected by Date of inspection 19__ Depth of casing .gallons per minute. gallons per minute. (TtTLG) feet; __.feet. GPO 889'085 GREATER ANCHORA'G~ AREA BOROUGH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 3500 TUDOR ROAD ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99507 279-8686 DATE RECEIVED:.~_ INSPECT: TIME: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF INDIVI'DUAL SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES FOR l, APPROVAL REQUESTED BY: /~,~./Lc ~, PHONE: 2. PROPERTY OWNER: ,~"~o~L~/-~ PHONE: 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~/~ 4. TYPE FACILITY TO BE INSPECTED:.~///~~/~/STREET: NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 5. WELL DATA: A. TYPE B. DEPTH C. SIZE D. CONSTRUCTION E. BACTERIAL ANALYSIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: A. SEPTIC TANK (IF HOMEMADE, SHOW DIAGRAM ON BACK) 1. s I z E /~,~'~Z~ ~/~//-/' ~', 2. AGE 3. MANUFACTURER APPROVAL REQUEST FOR SEWER & WATER FACILITIES PAGE TWO SEEPAGE PIT C. DISPOSAL FIELD NUMBER INES 2. TOTAL LENGTH REQUIRED MEASUREMENTS A. WELL TO SEPTIC TANK B. WELL TO SEEPAGE PIT F. G. H. WELL TO SEWER LINE ~ WELL TO PROPERTY LINE ~ WELL TO OTHER POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION FOUNDATION TO SEPTIC TANK ./// x FOUNDATION TO SEEPAGE PIT --~g x SEEPAGE PIT TO PROPERTY LINE 8. COM'MENTS:~ APPROVAL VALID FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE SIGNED. GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY