The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUNSET HILLS WEST BLK 4 LT 14 .~.~. GRE,.:ER ANCHORAGE AREA BOk,,..,GH \~;~;? !:~ Department of Environmental Quality '~ 3330 C Street Anchorage, Alaska 99503 INSPECTION REPORT ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ~OCAT,ON ~U C~-~U¢_ LEGALDESCR,PTION~-P ~ __g__~. q S~.~- H~IL~ S/~ SEPTIC TANK: INSIDE LENGTH_~~ INSIDE WIDTHs/' LIQUID DEPTH / LIQUID CAPACITY ~'gO GALLONS, TILE DRAIN FIELD: /- I TOTAL LENGTH DISTANCE FROM WELL/~.C~I~"FOUNDATION NEAREST LOT LINE I 0 OF LINES ] .,~.¢4..~ NUMBER OF LINES__/ DISTANCE BETWEEN LINES .~////~ TRENCH WIDTla,C~C~IN. TOTAL EFFECTIVE , ABSORPTION AREA_~_~ SQ. FT. LENGTH OF EACH LINE /~_~~~ DEPTH: TOP OF TILE TO PINISH GRADE_~ MATERIAL BENEATH TILE ~%ktN. ABOVE TILE ~(~ IN. WELL: TYPE BUILDING FOUNDATION CESSPOOl APPROVED __CONSTRUCTION __ NEAREST LOT LINE OTHER SOURCES DISAPPROVED NEAREST SEPTIC SEWER LINE__ TANK REMARKS DEPTH SEEPAGE SYSTEM DISTANCE FROM: DISTANCES: INSTALLED ~ ~ PIPE MATERIAL: Form EQ-032 DIAGRAM OF SYSTEM ~'o~ /: I~0 G.A.A.B. TH 1 1-22-77 0.0~ ous ."I ~". Existing System~ LOCATION DIAGRAM Not to Scale SILTY SAND W/ SObEE GRAVEL SAND W/SOME SILT AND SOME GRAVEL Boulder at 7' GRAVELLY SAND W/ SO~ SILT Occasional Cobbles Boulder at 11' 12.0' SAND W/ SOME SILT AND TRACE GP~AVE L Occasional Cobbles 15.0' SILTY SAND W/ TRACE GRAVEL Occasional Cobbles 20.0' T.D. NO WATER TABLE ENCOb"NTERED WHILE DRILLING This log represents subsurface soil conditions within Test Hole 1 at Lot 14, Block 4, Sunset Hills West, Anchorage, Alaska CKD: JMA DATE: 1-24-77. SCALE: 1"=3' S~ITARY SE~'~R TEST HOLE CHRISTIE, FULD, AND SAVILLE ~;CHORAGE, ALASKA Kay, Christie, Fuld & Saville ~l/ff~ 2600 Denali, 5th Floor ~ Anchorage, Alaska 99503 ' ~.[v~/~~Q~ Attn: Ms. Sue Ellen Tatter %~///~ ~e~ ~est ~ole a~ Seil ~eg ~ep~t for Sanitar~ ~ystem ~ot ~ ~lock ~, $~eet ~±lls ~est~ ~horage, Alaska Dear Ms. Tatter: We are submitting herewith the test boring results and our coIm~ents regarding soil conditions encountered at the subject site. This investi- gation was performed in accordance with your request of January 21, 1977 and those procedures outlined in a letter Sated July 15, 1975, by ~. Rolf Strickland of the Municipality of Anchorage Departn~ent of Environ- mental Quality. A single test hole was drilled at a location specified by Mr. Vega, within the subject site area, for the purpose of defining general subsur-. face soil conditions for the proposed sanitary system. Drilling was accomplished with an auger type drilling rig and the test hole was extended to a total depth of 20 feet below ground surface. The location and final log of the test hole have been included in Drawing A-01. Groundwater was not encountered in the test hole while drilling. A percolation test was performed at the depths indicated and reflects average infiltration from that depth to the bottom of the hole. Field data from the percolation test is shown in Table 1. The measured infil- tration rate was approximately three ~&nutes/inch. We appreciate being ~iven this opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions with regard to the above, please do no~ hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, I~ & M CONSULTANTS, INC. James W. Rooney -~ Vice President JWR :nh xc Municipality of Anchorage 9:58 am 9:59 10:00 10:01 10:02 10:03 10:04 10:05 10:06 i0:07 10:08 10:13 10:18 18:23 10:28 10:38 10:48 10:58 am ELAPSED TIME, MINU~ES 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 25 3O 40 5O 6O PERCOLATION TEST KA?~ CHRIST/E, FULD, AND SAVILLE R & M No. 751102 INCHES BELOW TOP OF TEST HOLE 10 11.5 13 14.25 15.13 15.63 17 17.75 18.25 19.25 20 22.25 24.25 25.5 26.25 27.75 28.25 30.25 DROP IN I:;CHES 0 1.5 1.5 1.25 0.88 0.5 1.38 0.75 0.5 1.0 0.75 2.25 2.0 1.25 0.75 1.5 0.5 2.0 20.25'! Total Drop = 2.96 min/inch ~'-.,, "- -- DAY, RECEIVE[) INSPECTION APPOINTMENTS TIME TIME ' ~ ~ 'rIME MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAOE MUNICIPALITY OF ANCRORAGE D~PT. OP ~' ,",Lfll & ) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC'~ONMENI,',L , ,.OI ECTION 82B L ~treet - Anchorage, Alaska 99501 ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION DIVISION MAR ~ ' 1980 Telephoue 264-4720 RECE A . OVA. DI flEgTIONS: Complete all parts on page 1. Incompleto requests will ~ot b~ processed. Please allow ten (~0) days for processing. ~ P~OPE~TY OWNE~ PHONE PBOPEBI'Y ~ESI PENT (If ditf~r~nt trom abow) PHONE 2. BUYE~ PHONE BAILING ADDRESS ) ~ LENDING INSTITUTION PHONE ~ REALTOR/AGENT ~HONE MAILING ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET LOCATION 6. TYPE OFRESID NCE NUMBEROF~BED S ~ [] One ~ ~ '~Ft,~ p [] Other ~ LE FAMILY E~ Two ~ 1[~ /~,_~o [] MULTIPLE FAMILY ~ Three ~ Six .... ) 7, WATER SUP. ELY .....4~'~ I N DIVI DUA L~ [] C0 V1MUNITY [] PUBLIC UTILITY ATTACH WELL LOG. A wel log is required for all wells drilled since June 1975. :or wells drilled prior to that date, give well aepth (attach o§ if available.) 8. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ~.....[~"- iNDiVi DUAL/ON.SiTE'-~' [] PUBLIC UTILITY YEAR ON-SITE SYSTEM WAS INSTALLED, NOTE: THE INSPECTION FEE MUST ACCOMPANY EACH REQUEST BEFORE PROCESSING CAN BE INITIATED. 72-010 (Rev. 0/79) THIS SIDE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 1. TYPE OF RESIDENCE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS [] SINGLE FAMILY [] ONE [] THREE [] FIVE [] OTHER [] MULTIPLE FAMILY [] TWO [] FOUR [] SIX PERMIT NUMBER 2, WATER SUPPLY [] INDIVI DUAL DEPTH OF WELL [] COMMUNITY DATE DRILLED [] PUBLIC UTI LITY Connection Verified LOG RECEIVED 3. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT NUMBER []INDIVIDUAL/ON -SITE DATE INSTALLED []PUBLIC UTILITY ~'-// ~ '~ ~ Connection Verified ~ INSTALLER []Septic Tank or E~Holding Tank Size: '~'Cd~ If Tank is homemade SOILS RATING give d~ T PEOPTANK MANUPAOTURER TOTAL ABSORPTION AREA MATERIAL 4. DISTANCES WELL TO: Septic/Holding Tank Absorption Area Sewer Line Nearest Lot Line Absorption Area to nearest Lot Line E, COMMENTS ,~/~PPROVED FOR-~_,~ BEDROOMS [] CONDITIONAL APPROVAL (letter must accompany/c/e~tFfi~te) [] DISAPPROVED .....-'" 72-010 (Rev. 6/79) Tobben Spurldand P.E. 8155 Cranberry St. Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Phone (907) 243-5302 SEWER ADEqUAO Y T~ST LOT 14, BLOCK 4 , SUNSET HILLS Mrs. Bonnie Thompson 2816 Redwood ~lace Anchorage, Alaska 99504 May 7, 1980 Residence: Water Sew~ Splitt level, single family, full basement, 5 bedrooms On site well Two separate systems For gray waters ~00 gal. tank with crib and drainfiel~ For sanitary waters 1500 ga]. tank with crib and drain field Date of teat March 31 and May 6, 1980 Due to confusion regarding the configuration of the systems and interference from groundwater, the two systems were tested separately on differsnt days. On march 31 the following readings were taken during filling of the crib for the sanitary system. Amount of water Water depth Stars test 12 inches 500 gal 27 1000 gal 42 1500 gal 52 At this ~me water was flowing into the tank The next day 38 Absorption rate .m~ 9~.~.'"?~, On M~ 6, 1980 500 gal wa. d~d into the second crib. ~"' A ';.~' '"' This caused a 13 inch rise in water level. After 15 hours the level had ~%{. ~A~ ~ tional oroblems. It ~av be necessary to ~ both tanks once or twice during March and Apr.. Atbachmenl; to claim fi].~ by Derry R. !',. ~onnie K. ([ ,mpson V~II. Manner of Occurance On [',]ay 8~ 1950 my husband and I completed a transaction ab I,'irst Natl. Bank of Anchorage 'that made us the new owners of 'the previously memtiomed residence. Prior 'bo closing I had given considerable time end effort to familiarizing myself wiuh septic systems in genera± and this one J.n particu- late [~his residence had a previous system fsi]. and a new one was designed and approved by 'the municipality in April, 197'?. I had been advised by the municipality that although city sewer was about 600 feet down the street, there were no immediate plans for hooking up any closer than thot~ I made innumerable phone ca].ls to the health department to learn the best way to pursue extension of the sewer line and to obtain any information I could on the existing septic system et lZ~25d Jarvi. ! ?.~,d ~ood reasons for checking things out carefully and explained to ..~.:~,.yone [[ talked 'to that ][ had one child under two years of age~ am expecting ~,noi;her b.'~by Jn August, and. my husband works ou~ of town most of ~he time. if desperately wa~ed to~oid septic prob]ems~ We liked the house and instead o~' psss:~ng ~t up beco :e of a p~ist proble~ (stpposedly correcled) we wanted to check everything cub thorou[~hly and determine if we could reasonably expect an operational, dependable septic system. When municipality approval of the system was issued, we thought we were buying a marketable home with an adequate sews, ge disposal system. As it '[;urns oub,~ we have neither. We moved in right ce.my and immediately started so~e remodeling,; - ~gain, wanting to be in and we[Il settled because I;he baby is due in ~ few months and my husband was due to leave soon for a job thsb would ~ake him out of 'town for most of the summer. Now~ less th~n a month ~fter closing on tee house I find that the septic system would not ~ow receive municipal approvs~ if we should have i.o sell it and that the municipality was in error in approving it for us to buy. Me,retiree, we have torn out old carpeting, ordered new carpet,-are'in ~he middle of remodeling two bsthrooms~ have a fence half up, would like to enclose the carpor~ before winter, and have come to a halt because we don't know where we stand with regm~d to the volue of our home. ~qy husband is gone now for probably most of 'Oho summer nnd our only contract is through Radio Anchorage. I have been d. eJ~llng with limited time and money and bo%'h are runnin[~ out~ ss are my physical ~nd emotion~l reserves.. The bank is very clear ~]bout one thing...we ow~ 'them because they h~ve a piece of p~per from you ~;hat says "approved". This situation is distressing and frighten:lng. The enthusiasm of e new home and ant:LcJ, p~tion of ~mprovinp~ it and cmjoy:].~lg ib nra gone. We did not pursue the purchase of bhis property casually or blindly. I asked,~].led, snd went to the municipality offices to check and double check records o~3 this preperty. !~he municipality provided approval bh~t a dependab].e~ adeqn~)te sewage disposal system exis'bed. It does rmb. I believe such a system should be provided for our use arflas assurance that this house will not be handi- capped if we should have to place it on 'the market at a future date. This situation is dz, sinJng emotionally and threatening to us financially. I respectfully request carrective action on the part of the municipality Bonnie K. Thompson [l.'~z~. lmrry .2 ...... MUNIC '^~ ITY OF ,~NCHORAGt~ ~ ~,~'r~'q--'~"F~- -'~,[W~r ~-,~,,.ML~N ~1_ USE ONLY NO],.E OF CLAIM ED-i,).~ AGAINST: ~Mumclpahty Of Ancho~afle [i~ Ancl~o~ age School [)ish iu[ PERSON OR PERSONS MAKING CLAIM ...........................................Name D~;cr,~L_~t, _&.._ Bonnie?~ jfhq[~!pson .......... 907/34-9-278fl ~P~_d'~;'vlL~Z~4 Anchor~g~_ A~f4s~~ P. '0. Box flO--28~Anchor8[~% A}Sz__995_ ~t~:_P~??~ Ii%lNvO~yeu ................. ~un.eb Hills West iq-251 Jarv~ Drzve~ Anohorage~ Alaska I, ot lZ[ Block IV. MUNICIPAL DE.I;A.R~.TMENT_ ~LNVOLV~ER l)epar trhent [ MuniciP~il E,~,pi~vel, - ?__ei~t. of Ilea]th & 'Bnvironnontol ProS. Derry R. Thompson j /4'1 Bonnie K. Thompson 36 }:. 0. Box q0-282~ Anch.99511154'9-278fl 5>. O. Box 10-282, Anch 99511 Directional Driller Great band Dir. Dlg Housewife -- 'Fio~di~ in~rl occur~ ......................... How did h~jurv occur? Approval of a septic system that had existing operational problems° Municipality was ~a, de,'~ aware of these proble[~ns prior bo issuing approval of the syste[n but issued approval anyway. .............................. Ef_:[EIVEb Municipal Clerk's Officei see a'btaohment. 'ii''~ 91980 ...... ~ June 30, 1980 Scott Wetzl Services Inc. 255 East Fireweed Suite 205 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Attention: Mr. Ed Walsh R&M No. 051079 MUNICIPAUTY OF ANCHORAGE DEPT. OF I.I~ALTH & F-NVIRONMENI'AL ?,qOTECHON JUL d; 1980 Re: Thompson Residence, Lot 14, Block 4; Sunset Hills West Subdivision Report of Site Inspection and proposal For Additional Services Gentlemen: As per your authorization, Mr. Ronald Black, of R&M Consultants, Inc. performed a site inspection of a septic system located on the subject lot. The purpose of this inspection was to become acquainted with the project and was not a detailed inspection of the facilities. Our findings and obser- vations were presented verbally to Mr. Walsh of your firm on June 26, 1980. R&M Consultants, Inc. is not independent from the project, having per- formed the original percolation test. A review of the boring log from that test indicates that groundwater was not encountered aL the site during the time of drilling. It is our understanding that the two septic tanks on the property are flooding and require frequent pumping to maintain operational use. We did discuss this with Mrs. 'Thompson who offered 'to present receipts for pumping out the system. We also reviewed a letter' from Mr. Tobin Spurkland P.E. who performed an adequacy test for septic systems located on-site. This letter indicates marginal operational characteristics of the system at the time the adequacy test was performed. It is our understanding that adequacy tests were performed separately on each of the two on-site systems. At this time, we cannot predict what influence the close proximity of the two systems have on one another but there is a possibility that 'the drainage fields overlap causing overloading of the soils in this area. A third septic system on an adjoining lot is also located nearby and could be impacting operational characteristics of the system serving the Thompson residence. This third system is quite new and may be a replacement for another system. Per Mr. Walsh's suggestion we are proposing to perform additional studies as discribed herein. We suggest that the payment 'for services performed be on a Time and Materials basis, in accordance with the attached fee schedule. Scott Wetzl Services June 30, 1980 Page 2 Mr. Gary Smith would be the project manager and would be assisted by Mr. Ronald Black and other individuals. It is our understanding that groundwater studies have been requested by the Municipality to determine the elevation and fluctuation of groundwater levels. It is also our understanding that your firm represents the Munici- pality of Anchorage in this action and that the technical staff of the Munici- pality will be availabe if needed. Our involvement is this project would be to drill and develop two observation wells with a depth not to exceed 20 feet and to obtain water samples suitable for laboratory testing. We also propose to supply staff to observe and record the change in water levels. We propose that Scott Wetzl Services, Inc. obtain permission to install ob- servation wells on the Thompson's property, and assume liability for all property damage that could not be prevented from a reasonably conducted drilling operation. City staff would review and comment on technical data obtained from water samples as well as give guidance on the technical pro- gress o'f the investigation. Our estimate of costs associated with performing the scope of work described is as follows: 1) Install Obserwltion Wells 2) Field Geologist - (5 hours) 3) Water Sampling and Testing 4) Observe Water Levels (Staff Geologist - 15 hours) 5) Written Report (Staff Engineer - 8 hours) (Senior Engineer - 4 hours) 6) Other; expenses including Coordination, Meeting with City staff, typing, drafting and mileage to Site Total Cost Estimate 750.00 150.00 500.00 450.00 272.00 200.00 460.00 $2~782.00 As stated earlier the actual fee would be based on the time and materials actually required to complete the job and while every effort will be made to meet this estimate we have not allowed for any contingency or increased scope of work. Very truly yours, R&M CONSULTANTS~ iNC. Ronald F, Black Senior Engineer RFB: GS/jh/L4/F 825 "L" STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 (907) 264-4111 GEORGE M. SULLIMAN, MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION June 17, 1980 Ed Walsh % Scott Wetsell and Associates 255 East Fireweed Lane Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Subject: Lot 14 Block 4 Sunset Hills West Subdivision Vega/Thompson Property .- 14251 Jarvi Drive The following is a chronological order of events regarding the above subject property. If you have any further questions, please call this office at 264-4720. Because the sewer system on this property was less than four(4) years old, this department would not have asked for an adequacy test; but at the request of the buyer, one was performed. After talking with Mr. Sprukland, the engineer who performed the adequacy test, he assured me that the system was functioning properly with the exception of possible problems in March and April during spring break up. According to the engineer's report, the sewer system can absorb well over the 750 gallons per day that is required. After talking with the buyer, they seemed satis~fied and so did I, that the system may only need to be pumped after heavy use during break up. I hope the above has been of some help to you. Sincer61y, Robert C. Pratt, R.S. Associate Specialist RCP/ljw cc: Ed Hit~ Risk Management E AND ASSOCIATES SOIL ANB MATERIALS £NGINEERINB AND TESTING John M, Lambe, P.E. 4101 Arctic Boulevard · Suite 205 · Anchorage, Alaska 99503 907-?.76-4113 Scott Wetsei 225 E. Fireweed Lane ~]~ / . Attenti Ed RECEIVED Subjec~14, Block 4 'unset Hills Subdiv:Lsio Dear Mr. Welsh, '---'-' In response to your request, we perfo~ed hydraulic testing of the black water system on the referenced property on December 8,9, & 10, 1980 with check readings on December 11 and 20, 1980. Ou~ data indicates that the system accepted 550 gallons per day on the final day of testing after accepting two previous surge loads of 750 gallons per day. The static level in the crib appears to be 7'10" below the clean out which the data indicates is 5" be- low the drain field invert (based on December 8 and 20 observations). This. absorption rate is slightly higher t~an the absorption rate reported by Mr. Spurkland for the black water (sanitary) system on May 7, 1980, however our test may have.utilized more of the drain field port:ion of the system. Our field data is attached to this letter. Mr. Pratt's letter of 10/25/76 re~arding the distribution of grey and black water to the system indicates that the black water system does not include laundry or dishwasher waters. Ass~ing two persons per bedroom generating a total of 75 gallons of waste water per person per day for five bedrooms, a total design capacity of 750 gallons per day (gpd) would be required. Subtracting 5 gallons per person per day for the dishwasher and 15 gallon~ per person per day for laundry, in accordance with the ,Manual of Septic Tank Practice" page 44, a capacity of 550 gallons per day could be ass~ed to be required on the black water system. Our results indicate that the black water system is probably .marginally capable of accepting the maximum design hydraulic loading which could be expected of it. The hydraulic capacity of this system Will be subject to continuing reduction as organic materials clog the voids in the soil matrix, however this is common with sePtic systems. As previously noted, the drain field appears to be constructed of corrugated plastic tubing drain tile and no sump was observed at the end of the field. The system appears to be presently handling the demands of · the Thompsons. Based on the 1500 gallon capacity of the tank and six days between pumpings in August, and assuming the crib was partially functional, say 500 gallons, last August's use may have been 300 gpd to 350 gpd. We know of no failures subsequent to the remedial work we performed in August, 1980. It is possible, however that spring run off, perched on the seasonal frost, may flood the system this spring. It is my opinion that the data indicates that the black water absorption system is marginally adequate to accept the maximum design loading, however the system may be adversely affected by spring melt and will be sensitive to the natural clogging of this absorption system as a function of time. Very Truly Yours, John M. Civil Engineer / Lambe, P.E. 4254-E Attac~nents JML/cs ' I / 7"-2'¢o I~oOo TIYFg I0 ./4) /,2- ~~~~~~~~~~;. John M. immbr,, P,E. 4303 North S~r S~n~ Anchorage, ~ka, 995~ '907-279~0~ G~NS John M, Lamir, P.E. ~303 North Star Strut Ancbora~o, Alaska, 99503 ~7-27~ ~,~:., ~ ~~~~~ ~,7~ ~- ...... DEP~ B~ MET~m READING G~LONS P~ED ~ '. / ,~,ot/ .... . / 7' 55" ,. t,: :? ' SHEET 0 : ';~'4 John M. Lambe, P.E 4303 North St~r Strut Anr. homl~, PJaska, 99503 907 27941056 EXISTING DRAIN FIELD TI~T ~ t ~t DEPTH BELOW REFERENCE ,m'7&" .17' ~'" ..... /7' ¥ >~ " /://" ,, METER READING GALLONS PUMPED ___/~0 ..... ___1~o _. ,z__.~ ~_ TIME iJ5_O ~9 ~_ ' d,5-o l, aw Offices of K~Y, CIIRISTIE, PL[LD ~ SaVILLE January 26, 1977 Mr. Robert Pratt Municipality Sanitation Department 825 'L" Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Re: Vega Property Dear Mr. Pratt: Please find enclosed a copy of the completed report of the soil[ test made on the Vega property. Please lek me hear from you. SET/ln Eric. Very truly yours, KAY, CHRISTIE FULD & SAVILLE Sue gllon ~atter J~.nua~J' 20, 1977 Lot 14 Block 4 Sunset Hill~ $~bdivi~;ion ~.he l~tter wa~ wrt~te~ after my s~ond ~tem wa~ funotio~ing property a~,d bucaus(~ I was informed by ~Ir. J~rry D~ V~ll of the Jack ~h~e Coi~pany first in~;p~c.~tion was on ~e 22nd ~d 23rd of July. 1976o I~y .econ~i l~mp~,otio~% ,wa~ on October 21~ 1976 and October 22~ 1976. on th~ first ~e~pool, which fatl~d. year during break-up. A~cordin%~ to Issao's~ it J,~ p~pod On a regular basis. If th~e aHe any furthest quomtien,~, please sontaot me at Sanitarian GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH ~5~1 Department of Environmental Quality 3330 "C" Street, Anchorage,.Alaska 99503 274-4561 Date Received __July 21t 1976_ . Time of Inspection ;2~%3 ~.m. Date of Inspection 7-~ ~, Thursday \ REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF r~tt INDIVIDUAL SEWER & WATER FACILITIES FOR l, Approval requested by: Mailing Address: 2. Property Owner: Mailing Address: 4. 5. 6. On Assumption Dorik Mechant % Jack White Company, 3201 C Street Legal Description: Lot 14 Block 4 Sunset Hills Siubdivision Location: Jarvi Drive, see map Single Family Type of facility to be inspected Well Data: Individual A. Type B. Depth C. Construction D, Bacterial Analysis Sewage Disposal System: On-site system A, Installed_ 1968 B. Installer C, Septic Tank: 1. Size 2. Manufacturer D. Seepage Pit: E. Disposal Field: Distances: A. Well to: Septic tank Nearest lot line B. Foundation to septic tank C. Absorption area to nearest lot line 1. Absorption Area Total length of lines No. of bedrooms 5 , Absorption area _.~, Other contamination , Absorption area 118' , Sewer Lines Material EQ-034 (1/74) Page 1 of two pages Page 2 of two page§ - Re ~st for Approval of Individual ,er & Water Facilities Legal Description Lot 14 Block 4 Sunset Hills. Subd___ivision Comments Approved Disapproved Approval Valid for one year from date signed Greater Anchorage Area Borough, Department of Environmental Quality DIAGRAM OF SYSTEM certify that the information contained in this request for approval to be a true and accurate representation of the subject sewer and water facilities and these facilities are operating satisfactorily, SIGNED Date EQ-034 (1/74) MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONIVlENTAL PROTECTION, 2510 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99504 276-2221 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF INDIVIDUAL SEWER and WATER FACILITIES 1. Type of Inspection: 2. Property Owner:_ Mailing Address: 3. Name of Buyer: Mailing Address: 4. Name of Lending Institution'. CMRO VA FHA CONV LT,~o/C ,5 ~,z-~ ~/~/ ~ay Phone: / Mailing Address:_ 3 ~-6 [ C ,.?'/-F¢ ~.~ Phone:_ ,F2 2 Type of Facility to be Inspected: Water Supply Type of Supply: Public Utility If Individual, number of dwellings presently served _ If Individual, depth of well. //~> ,/" '- ~- rlndividual. (,~ ~ 4 .~_~ , No. Bdrms. --~ Sewage Disposal System Type of System: Public Utility If Individual, date of installation / ~'[~- '~) '- Individual (on-site) 72-003(3/76) Box 4-3043 / /7-77 / / the lot; anal ti%~% two (2) f~rt~t tO ~he sOU~ti are ~h~ ~ew o~r~ hire~l Curry Lln~ Cl,~ni~l~ t~ ~,o~ibly fr~e cemspool~ far'~h~st ~ou%h w~e a~rvioec~ only Dy tl~e ~i~hwa~{hor FHA-Perm 2573 FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION Budget Bureau Rev. July 195~ HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL INDIVIDUAL WAlrER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSURING OFFICE ~RORTGAGOR OR SPONSOR PART I.--TO BE COMPLETED BY FHA MJ~i RTGAGEE ata~luaka Valley llank USDIVISION NAME .... BASEMENT WATER SUPPLY BYI ~ublic system E3 Community system · PROPERLY ADDRESS t Ja~vi Rtl, ~_~/'~lchor al]~ LAlaeka ] New installation 1 BLOC~ NO. LOT NO. . .1.4 Con aflie or other area be mode Into addllioncd hedraams? [] No [] Individual i [] Individual E~- ~e-i o SEWAGE DISPOSAL BY: [] Public system [] Community system PART II..--TO BE COMPLETED BY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMEHT INSPECTOR'S SKETCH It is the opinion of the [] State [] County [~ Local Department of Health that this individual water-supply system [] is [] is not satisfactory as a domestic water supply for the subject property. It is the opinion of the [] State [] County [] Local Department of Health that this individual sewage-disposal sys- tem with proper maintenance: [] Can be expected to function satisfactorily, and [] Cannot he expected to function satisfactorily is not likely t(~ create an insanitary condition ~ DATE ~O~ ? , ~ / Om',ob~ NOTE~ The heol{l{ out~r}ty'~-- shoul~ ~omplele lhe opproprlote opinion Motemeot ohove ond o~A dote, sl~nolure ond title }n spaces provided, Use of the ~bove ~rid for Health Depm'tment Inspector's sketch as well ~s use of the back of this form is at the option of the health authority. PART III.~FOR USE OF FHA OFFICE TO THE CHIEF UNDERWRITER: I have reviewed the foregoing and the pertinent FHA Compliance Inspection Report, and recommend that'the Individual water-supply system be CODSidered [--] Acceptable ~ Not acceptable ~wage disposal be considered [] Acceptable [] Not Acceptable. DATE SIGNATURE HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL INDIVIDUAL WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAl, SYSTEM ] CHIEF ARCHITECT ] DEPUTY FOR CHIEF ARCHITECT FHA Form 2573 REQUEST'FOR APPROVAL 6F INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE AND WATER FACILITIES . (Fill out in Trip~te) 2. ~ Name of property: owner 4, Number..o~.bedrooms in house ~U 5, Ware ~Analys is: a. Bacterial b. Detergent '" ' Well data: b. Depth ~. , c. Casing Size d. Distance from well to closest existing or proposed: 1. Sewer line ....... . 2, Septic tank___,.__, 3, Seepage Area 4, Cesspool' 5. Property Line Other sources of possible contamination, i.e., creeks, lakes, houses, barn~ drainage ditch, etc. 7, Sewage disposal system, a. Age of system_ b, Septic tank capacity in gallons /~'-~ 0 , c. Name of septic tank manufactu~e.~ , 1. If "home made" show i d agram on reverse side of this form. d.' Disposal field om seepage pit size and type 1, Distanc~ to property line to house foundation ooJat~, r< Te t' · uits Percolation 'rest performed by ................... . Use t~ reverse .side of this form to show diagram. Diagram should include '%he foil.owing information: p~operty llnes~.well location, house location, ~"'~,~{c tank location, disposal area location, location of percolation test~ a~ d~rection of ground slope. g, T~e ], ~ ,,,~,~ on this form is true an~l correct to the best of my knowledEe, FILLED OUT BY HEALTj! D. Ef2?,?.~E~T. PER$O~NE~L above l , ' ~eserlbed saeitamy fauili~ies are hereby epproved~ subject to the following con~] .~ . The above described sanitamy facilities are dissppmoved for the following reasons: ' Approval is valid for one yearfollowzng' the date of approval. CPJ:cw " --~'~"~=~ REQUEST FOR AP?RO¥^L OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE AND WATER FACILITIES (Fill out in Triplicate) -- 3, Seepage Area 4, Cesspool~_ , ~X__~? , P.operty Line.,,/7 6. Other sources of ,possible contaraination, i,e., creeks, lakes, houses, baron, dra~na~ ditch etc. ~,/O/'/(~ . Sewage disposal system.--~/ / a. Age of system / ~:.¢~. ~ ~ ~''~ c. Name of septic tank manufactu~ _ _~. 1. If "home made" show dlagmam on revePse side of this form. Disposal field or seepage pit size and type, 1, Distance to property line to house foundation_ e, Percolation. Test ~esults ...... =_ , f. Iercolatzon Test performed by Use the reverse side of this form to show diagram. Diegram should include ~;he foilowing znformatmor,, p?operty lines; .well location, house location, ~pt.]c tank location, disposal area location~ location of percolation test, and~ direction of ground slope, The lnfomr, ation on this form zs true an(] cor~ect~ thy best of my knowledg , TO BE FILLED OUT BY HEALTH DEPARTqENT PERSONNEL 'The above described sanitary facilities are hereby approved, subject to the ......... ~611owing cond~'lo~s ~ ' c d' ' ' ?~ ~ on zt~ons: {. /' ~'\,~ The above described sanitary facilities are disapproved for the following reasonst ~ignak~u~e of ~.~ic-f~i~.~: V". ~ ,., .;. ' Approval is valid for one year following the date of approval, CPJ: cw