The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTHE VILLAGES Tract 7B1 & 7B2 Plat# 89-087 S-8753(DLSIS�OIbL flccio4 -1�'il iw1Ea Sersan s3 N.{ gel -0-0n 06/09/2007 SAT 17:12 FAX 9077621025 421 003/007 May 25 2306 9:04 P.02 STAID CSF ALASKA / DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION %? DIVISION OF WATER WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PROGRAM May 25, 2006 Frank MurkowM, Governor 553 CORDOVA ANCUORAGE, AX 99501 P (907)(907)269-7519 2 9 69 3437 hep:/Jwwrov stataaknvda;. Michael N. Aederson, P E. C1vil Shoshone ln Avenue ung & Construction Anchorage, Alaska 99516 Re: The Village Subdivision Tract 7B -2 -Anchorage, Alaska -Conditional Approval to Construct a Wastewater Collection System-ADEC Plan Tracking Number5495 Dear Mr. Anderson: On Match 17, 2006 we received an mrsubmittalr po type'Wastewater Deem= System. Tho three Ica, bedroom d velopman nt isx expect d tooanced generate 900 gallons per day. P edroom devdopment is expected The soils analysis determined a percolation rate of 2 minutes per Mob. The soil &I caption system consists of a field which has a lecgth of42 feet, will be 5 feet wide and bas a planned effective depth of 2 fat. The Department bas reviewed the advanced treatment system and the onsite soil absorption system to serve the throe plex and conditional approval to construct in accordance with Wastewater Resoled= 8 AAC 72.225. The proposed system is hereby Issued a "Certificate to Constnut for the edvanced wastewater system (enclosed). Please use the referenced plan tracking rumba in corn spondenuro regarding this system. This approval Is contingent upon compliance with the following conditions: rev • I) The A7t20 pod when starting to operate requires field adjustment to meet the expected discharge design effluent requirements. Include an inspection report on the treatment system after the adjustment et start up of the units has been completed 2) A current Maintenance Agreement must be on file with tbia office. In:Jt4c the name and address of the maintatcncc providers. The maintenance provider be trained on the proper operation of the unit by the mamfactmer. Be advised a current mettle's/nee provider must be in-place for the life of the system. Maintenance inspections must occur at least once each year and include an inspection of the soil absorption arm to assure that effluent from the system is not surfacing. A brief tvdtten report for each annual inspection roust be provided by the maintenance provider to the owner. The owner of the system must retain all maintenanwinspection records and make them available to the department if requested. The treatmer; system should be pumped -out on an as•oecded basis, based on the annual inspection. If the inspection reveals surfacing effluent or if seepage from the soil absorption system is noted at any time, the owner must notify the Anchorage ADEC office within one working day. 06/09/2007 SAT 17:12 FAX 9077621025 (?1004/007 Mar 25 2005 9:05 P.03 3) The record drawings need to include the service access rotes to allow year round accts, to the Advents* unit • 4) If the applicant falls to construct, alter, install, or modify the system within taro (2) years after the date that the department issues an approval to cataract, the approval is void, and plans must be resubmitted, [along with the associated fees], for department review and approval. 5) Deviattone from approved plans which affect capacity, flow, operation, majordesign of units, point of discharge, materials of major system components (such as pipe, lagoon linen, etc.), or separation distances, must bo approved by DEC in vetting prior to their implementedoa. 6) This approval Ls contingent upon compliance with the conditions of Wastewater Disposal Regulations, 18 AAC 72.235, Constrtrcfion Certification. The noted section of the regulations requires that a "Certification oftowawction" be completed and submitted to the Department within ninety (90) days of completion of construction. As-btult plans or record drawings should indicate any changes or deviations tom the approved pleas to • racilitatefinal review. A"Cert(JioatonofConraucnon"kiln isenclosed far your use. 7) This approval is contingent upon yootherauthorizationswhich Bre required for Your Project- You ars obtainllethe necessary authorizations befcie proceeding with your project- 8) roject8) You are advised that if this development will require placing fill In wetlands or working in a steam, river, or lake, permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Alaska Department of Natural Rraources may be required. A Coastal Projects Questounaae will help you Identify other permits and approvals that may be required for your project. This approval does not imply the granting of additional authorizations nor obligate any state, federal or local regulatory body to grant required authorhations. Anypeason who disagrees with this decision may request an adjudicatory bearing is accordance with 18 AAC 15.195-14 AAC 15.340 or an inform -4 review by the Division Director in accordance wish 18 AAC 15.185. Informal review requests mist be delivered to the Divisor Director, 555 Cordova Stmt, Atrborage, Alacla 99501, within 15 days of receiving the decision. Adjadlcatory hearings requests must be delivered to the Commissioner of the Department of Envhrnmearl Conservation, 410 Willoughby Avenue, Sulk 303, P.O. Box 111800, Juneau, Alaska 99801, within 30 days of the decision. If a hearing b cot requested within 30 days, the right to appeal is waived. Thank you for your coopemtioa If you have any questions please do not hesitate to conxct ma at 269-7519. Pr— RGI/,.e. ss: t• T , ! -f c4 4 William It. Meth, P.P. Environmental Engineer 06/09/2007 SAT 17:13 FAX 9077621025 Mar 25 2106 9:05 • STATE OFALASKA DEPARTbtENTOP EM IRONMPrTAL DONSERVA71oN CONSTRUCTION qND OPERATION CERTIFICATE OOhTESTIC t for rets -,Y, ASTELJATE Cl�POSA APPROVAL. TO CONSTRUCT .'4pSG A.l.4•... YST ,• P.04 A. • Plana for the construction or mod!flcat(pn of ' N� 3'49 tl / rn+ti.�7.4 _7 / darn estio wastewater dleposat system bcateci in Alaska, submitted In accordance with 18 AAO 72,225 by. ... . 4 hays been reviewed and are Q approved. � // � conjdrcvs ldonailYippd (sae afached candlJahe). 7a BY TITLEgma.DA'E frears:ty on''haarta:at� t■dwNhtnrwoy■aro of the ftca n tnn3 masrbe submitted years approval Atte, 4 u tion. ste k veld andnewpland and i�P�'++1 wore construction. 8. APPROVED CHA'1/41/3E ORDERS • . 2574 • Change (cams_.astana.erda+sdkfvanrennes) Approved by • Date C: APPROVAL TO OPERATE • The *APPROVAL TO OFERATE" section must bs completed and atoned by the Department before this system la made available fotuse. • The tonsauction of the • domestic wastewater disposal eYa`artt was completed on granted Interim approval b cp erate for 90 da fo.lowin � • ( thea, ora The system a. hereby • Ya t p anon data. av . TITLE --_ As -built plans submitted eluting the Interl.n DAT' Department, has confirmed the system was constructed ccordin • The system Is herebPection t J tna y Granted final' approval to operate: G tC the apamva� cars. St ---�� TITLE DATE e 005/007 06/09/2007 SAT 17:11 FAX 9077621025 Ij 006/007 • ``� ` ,`` PROPERTY LINE, � --------• • \\�_DRAOJACE�ENTERUNE • . • • • • ` 1 1/4' PRESSURE UNE C TANK CO v'_------- P---- i • - WELL FC • DOUBLE Cd.` ADVANTEX AX -20 W/ DUEL POD SYSTEM & 2500 GALLON TANK. SEE SHEET S3 FOR COMPLETE VIEW. CLASS 'C' WELL j./ 150' RADIUS 0 Cf 0�/ PROPERTY — Septic Design Prepared For DARRELL KVASAGER TRACT 7B-2 THE VILLAGES SUBDIVISION Prepared By - MICHAEL N. ANDERSON, P.E. 4640 SHOSHONI DRIVE (907) 345-3377 / FAX (907) 345-1391 SCALE: 1"=50' MARCH 12, 2006 06/09/2007 SAT 17:14 FAX 9077621025 Z007/007 • • )?OTTER VALLEY ESTATE LOT • 3+ acres • Underground power and telephone • Natural gas Cleared building site • Septic permit for 6 bedrooms approved 2006 • View of Anchorage and Tumagin Arm • Paved and maintained road • Municipality inspected and approved gravel driveway with culvert • Potential subdivision • Potential creek South on Seward Highway to Potter Valley Road. Left on Potter Valley Road to Villages Scenic Parkway (approximately 2 miles). Right on Villages Scenic Park (approximately 1/3 mile). Cleared property to the left with driveway. Tract 7 B-2, The Villages Subdivision. TME FOLLOW NOTES APPLY TO THE RDACADON OF THE STREAM: 1. TEMPORARY DETENTION POND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTION FOR SEQUENT ANO BE REMOVED WIER CONSTRUCTION OR 12 MONTHS MAXIMUM. 2. DRAINAGE THREAD CENTER SHALL BE RE-STNXED BY SHANE HOLT, REGISTERED SURVEYOR THE SPRING OF 2007. 3. NATURAL GRADE OF DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED. van FOR THE DEIENRON 4. NATNE VEGETATION. F ANY. SHALL BE RE-ESTABXSHED AS DIRECTED DY THE CORPS ENGINEERS. S. ALL 143RIC SHALL 8£ UNDER THE DIRECTION Of LIKE ANDERSON. P.E AND COORDINATED THE CORPS Of ENGINEERS. 6. COMPLETION OF THE DRAINAGE DMPROVF]EMS SHALL CONFINE THE WHAM WTI}W DEFINED THREAD. 7. ONE YEAR AFTER COYPLLiWN. M INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE 87 THE CORPS. THE THE OWNERS ENGINEERS. MY REROUTING OF THE DRAINAGE WHICH WAS TAKEN PLACE CORRECTED AND THE DRAINAGE ROUMED TO THE oRIGIW. THREAD. N RADE r POND. OF WV THE IAOA AMD SHALL BE \i`MAX. DEPTH 0.5' 1114' VACAM WT BBETREESCUUEDD 12 POTO MONTHS AFTER STREAM ON OF STREAM THREAD. SIZE 5'X 5'X2'DEEP NEW DRAINAGE THREAD. HAND EX EXCAVATE CUL' r TRENCH 1' AND 6' DEEP. CURTER ID TO BE LOCATED 8Y SURVEYOR. WIDE UNE 13 VACANf1 LOT 1` 3 C_I\� 1 ` 1 a Q 9zz,' /�L 1 AING •a ENT --- rsNc lir �/ / d GRFi�E OR7�- VACANT LOT COSTING STREAM THREAD TO 8E RELOCATED SepUc Deaton Prepared For DARRELL KVASAGER .•"\P....."'•1 TRAC THE VILLAGES SUBDIVISION .c,, ****.*\i es j ti...... tfd WCHAEL N ANDERSON! No. CE 9469 • . • a Prepared By MICHAEL N. ANDERSON, P.E. 4640 SHOSHONI DRIVE (907) 345-3377 / FAX (907) 345-1391 W ♦ \' �• �� SCALE: 1"=200' OCT 12, 2006 5ctitor 111 Tom Fink, Mayor Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services 825 "L" Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 October 19, 1989 Darl Kvasager, P.E. 1856 Chantrelle Lane Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 Re: S8753 (The Village Subdivision, Tract 7B1 and 782.) Dear Mr. Kvasager: In response to your letter of October 2, it is my understanding that staff had some concern with the note placed on the plat and referenced in your. letter. Specifically, their concern is whether the note adequately portrays the full intent of the Platting Board's decision with respect to Lot 782. As you know, once a plat is filed and property becomes a lot of record, the regulations governing the use of an on-site septic system are different from those covering unsubdivided property. With the above thought in mind, I understand that my staff through Jerry Weaver, the Platting Officer, suggested an additional noLe for the plat that they felt would address their concern and clearly express the full intent of the Platting Board. On October 6, Mr. Weaver advised my staff that you objected to placement of this note on the plat. At the conclusion of that discussion, my staff concurred with Mr. Weaver that the plat should be filed. This has been accomplished to the best of our knowledge. I do not find any evidence of coercion in this matter on the part of staff. They made a proposal to you, you rejected it and that ended the discussion No doubt you have been advised by now that the plat was filed earlier this month. I hope this adequately explains our interest in this matter and that we can now consider it closed. Sincerely, Robert A. (Bert) Hall, Director Department of Health and Human Services cc: Jim Kubitz, Assemblyman Paula Easley, Director, Economic Development and Planning vilee Browning, P.E., Manager, Environmental Services DARL I{VASAGLR 1856 Chantrclle Lane Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 (206) 422-8008 October 2, 1989 Director, Department of Health and Human Services The Municipality of Anchorage Pouch 6-650 Anchorage, AK 99519-6650 RE: S8753 (The Villages Subdivision Tract 7131 and 7B2) Dear Director: RFcrJVgD OCT 131981 C)ftice of the{D/rector; The referenced plat was heard and approved on March 1989. The approval was contingent upon placing a specific note regarding development of on-site sewer and water. This note was to be: "Lot 7B1 cannot be developed until public sewer and water is available and Lot 7B2 cannot be developed until public sewer and water is available or approval from DIMS has been obtained for on-site septic." This plat and its contingent approval did not happen in a vacuum. All departments commented and a thorough public hearing was held. The Platting Board carefully considered this plat and, after lengthy and sincere discussion, approved 88753 with the note as above recited. Mr. Smith and Mr. Browning, personnel in your department, were against the plat and continue to oppose its recording. However, the Water Quality Supervisor, Mr. Marc Little, had "no comment" on his September 26, 1988 review of S8753. It is my position that if your department had such an overwhelming concern about the impact on the public's health, safety, welfare and convenience, your department should have appealed the Plv " "g Board's decision of March 1, 1989 and conducted another public hearing at the Municipality of Anchorage Assembly. The time frame for that appeal expired nearly six months ago. The attempt by your department to coerce an amended note prior recording is not fair. Let me tell you a story about a similar platting situation, Many years ago during Mayor Sullivan's administration, I presented a plat on Commercial Drive for Mr. Loren Lounsbury and Mr. Clarence I-Ierschbach. The plat was extremely straight forward, except the Planning Department wanted a bike trail dedication/easement along Commercial Drive. The Platting Board approved the plat without the bike trail easement. "I'he planning staff felt so strongly about the public's need for this bike trail that the platting staff appealed the Platting Board's decision to the Assembly. Their appeal was timely filed within the appeal period. The decision of the Platting Board was not overturned, and the plat was recorded without any reference to bike trail easements. The Municipality of Anchorage October 2, 1989 Page 2 My point in re -telling this story is to advise you that a department may not agree with the conclusion of the Platting Board. However, specific courses of action are permitted to allow for further review of the Platting Board's decision. Nowhere in the platting regulations is coercion a remedy. Therefore, please review S8753 with Jerry Weaver, Platting Officer, and assist him in recording the plat as approved. Professionally yours, Darl Kvasager, P.E. DK:sbs cc: Mr. Jim Kubitz, Assemblyman Mr. Mark Korting, Platting Board Member Ms. Paula Easley, Director of Economic Development and Planning Mr. Jerry Weaver, Platting Officer Mr. Loren Lounsbury Mr. Janes Sawhill Mr. Jim McCollum DARL KVASAGER 1856 Chantrelle Lane Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 (206) 422-8008 October 2, 1989 Director, Department of Health and Human Services The Municipality of Anchorage Pouch 6-650 Anchorage, AK 99519-6650 RE: S8753 (The Villages Subdivision Tract 7B1 and 7B2) RFCEJVED 007 i 3 799.9 office e the Director, Dear Director: The referenced plat was heard and approved on March 1989. The approval was contingent upon placing a specific note regarding development of on-site sewer and water. This note was to be: "Lot 7B1 cannot be developed until public sewer and water is available and Lot 7B2 cannot be developed until public sewer and water is available or approval from DHI-IS has been obtained for on-site septic." This plat and its contingent approval did not happen in a vacuum. All departments commented and a thorough public hearing was held. The Platting Board carefully considered this plat and, after lengthy and sincere discussion, approved S8753 with the note as above recited. Mr. Smith and Mr. Browning, personnel in your department, were against the plat and continue to oppose its recording. However, the Water Quality Supervisor, Mr. Marc Little, had "no comment" on his September 26, 1988 review of S8753. It is my position that if your department had such an overwhelming concern about the impact on the public's health, safety, welfare and convenience, your department should have appealed the Platting Board's decision of March 1, 1989 and conducted another public hearing at the Municipality of Anchorage Assembly. The time frame for that appeal expired nearly six months ago. The attempt by your department to coerce an amended note prior recording is not fair. Let me tell you a story about a similar platting situation. Many years ago during Mayor Sullivan's administration, I presented a plat on Commercial Drive for Mr. Loren Lounsbury and Mr. Clarence Herschbach. The plat was extremely straight forward, except the Planning Department wanted a bike trail dedication/easement along Commercial Drive. The Platting Board approved the plat without the bike trail easement. The planning staff felt so strongly about the public's need for this bike trail that the platting staff appealed the Platting Board's decision to the Assembly. Their appeal was timely filed within the appeal period. The decision of the Platting Board was liot overturned, and the plat was recorded without any reference to bike trail easements. The Municipality of Anchorage October 2, 1989 Page 2 My point in re -telling this story is to advise you that a department may not agree with the conclusion of the Platting Board. However, specific courses of action are permitted to allow for further review of the Platting Board's decision. Nowhere in the platting regulations is coercion a remedy. Therefore, please review S8753 with Jerry Weaver, Platting Officer, and assist him in recording the plat as approved. Professionally yours, Darl Kvasager, P.E. DK:sbs cc: Mr. Jim Kubitz, Assemblyman Mr, Mark Korting, Platting Board Member Ms. Paula Easley, Director of Economic Development and Planning Mr. Jerry Weaver, Platting Officer Mr. Loren Lounsbury Mr. James Sawhill Mr. Jim McCollum Atzi A - -nom - "-ct A,vn -r.c-r 0(7 I 0 —/17 �y MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE MEMORANDUM DATE: July 27, 1989 TO: Jerry Weaver, Platting Officer, DEDP FROM: John Smith, Y.E., Program Manager Jr11--1 On -Site Services, DHHS SUBJ.: S-8753, The Villages S/D As you are aware, this department made rather comprehensive comments during our review of The Villages plat. These comments primarily noted that soils reports did not meet the minimum requirements established'by ordinance for a preliminary plat. In fact, this department recommended denial of the plat due to poor soils, inadequate soils reports, and high groundwater. We felt that the developer had not met the minimum criteria in AMC 15.65.145 or 21.15.110. Unfortunately, the plat was subsequently approved by the Platting Board. I am concerned that the Platting Board, in approving the plat, has ignored both your comments as well as those made by this department. The On -Site Wastewater ordinance, AMC 15.65.145, sets out specific standards for development of land into subdivisions. Section B requires an original and two replacements sewage disposal sites; Section 0 requires the applicant to show a calculated disposal reserve area; and Section D allows DHHS to require delineation of areas with less than 25% slope. In addition, AMC 21.15.110 specifies additional requirements for soils which must be met before the plat can be taken to the board. We found that the information which was submitted was either deficient in meeting criteria (such as no water monitoring), had improperly conducted percolation tests, or showed ground water above acceptable levels. The developer failed to address surface water concerns and to show how there are three viable disposal sites on each lot. No reserve area calculation was rnade. Finally, there was no effort made to show the availability of an adequate and safe potable water supply. Page 2 The Villages Since the developer did not meet the minimum requirements as required by ordinance, we feel the plat should not have been heard by the Platting Board. But since it was, it appears that the Board was unaware that the proposed subdivision was in violation of both ordinances. We are particularly concerned about this situation since the code requirements for subdivisions are substantially different from those pertaining to "lots of record." When AMC 15.65 was amended in 1986, the intent was to allow development of pre-existing lots, but to impose more stringent requirements on new development. The action of the Platting Board will have the effect of circumventing those more stringent requirements. Once the plat is recorded, DHHS will be unable to impose regulations contained in 1.5.65.145. Therefore, as we have previously discussed, this department will not sign the final plat as we feel that to do so would seriously compromise our position of enforcing AMC 15.65. We also feel that our signature on the final plat implies that all our concerns have been met, and obviously that is not the case. We are willing to sign the plat, however, under either of the following conditions: 1. Provide an additional note to read "No development will occur on either lot until public sewer is available." 2. Provide an additional note to read "No development will occur. utilizing on-site sewage disposal until such time as conditions in 15.65.145 and 21.15.110 have been met." cc: Lee Browning, P.E. Manager, Environmental Services Susan Oswalt PLATTING BOARD MEETING PAGE 4 March 1, 1989 AYE: Houston NAY: Hooyer, Brady, Korting, Johannes, Isaacs, Magby ABSTAIN: Kjelstad FAILED 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Public Hearings 1. S-8753 The Villages Subd., Tracts 731&7B2. Resubdivide 1 lot into 2 lots, vacate 33' sectionline easement and a 30' right-of-way easement, and create a 50' screening easement. Located south of Potter Creek, between Scenic Parkway and Greece Drive. Staff member JERRY WEAVER stated that this property is undeveloped and zoned R-6. The Assemby rezoned the property to R-7 contingent on several things, including the extension of public sewer, which is not available at this time. The reasoning behind this request to divide this property into two tracts is to allow division of interest between two partners. Staff is concerned because of the soils condition, slope, and water table which would preclude the ability to have on-site sewer systems. Because of the proximity of surround development and the condition placed on the R-7 rezoning, Staff was supportive of this replat with a note added that this property not be developed until public sewer is available. Staff felt the vacation of Greece Drive was premature until the surrounding area is developed and recommended denial of all vacations. CHAIR ISAACS asked if condition #3 on page 007 should be included as a condition of this replat. Staff had no objection. The public hearing was opened. JIM SAWHILL, representing the petitioner, stated that the purpose of this request was to facilitate division of ownership of this property. He stated that, when sewer is extended to this area, the property will become zoned R-7/SL. PLATTING BOARD MEETING PAGE 5 March 1, 1989 One of the petitioners in this case objects to the note being required by Staff and the other does not object. The former (owner of Lot 782) objects in light of soils investigations on his property that show three test holes as areas adequate for on-site sewer systems. The petitioner feels the vacation of Greece Drive is appropriate because it is presently unconstructed and will likely remain so. MR. SAWHILL distributed a copy of a concept plan for developing this property to higher density with no connection to Greece Drive. He stated that it would not be appropriate to channel higher density traffic through the R-6 development in the Villages Scenic Parkway area, so Greece Drive will not be needed. MR. SAWHILL suggested modifying the note requirement to be placed on Lot 7B1 only and adding #3, "Placing a note on the plat that Lot 7B2 cannot be developed until public sewer is available or additional soils tests are provided and approved by DHHS." BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES stated that all the tests she read indicated that no soils were suitable for on-site systems. MR. SAWHILL referenced page 046 of the packet and indicated three test holes which may be adequate. MS. JOHANNES stated that she had been reading test results on pages 060 through 065. MR. SAWHILL stated that those tests were done in 1978 and were not done to current standards. BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES asked why the 10' utility easement was being requested for vacation. MR. SAWHILL replied that it is adjacent to the right-of-way being requested for vacation and would be moved to the edge of the property. BOARD MEMBER MAGBY asked how the subdivision would receive access if the R-7 is in effect and there is no access via Villages Scenic Parkway. MR. SAWHILL replied that, under the present R-6 zoning, the access would be via Villages Scenic Parkway; but in the future, any subdivision would be done in conjuction with the property to the east and access would be provided there. MR. MAGBY asked what were the requirements for on-site systems. MR. SAWHILL replied that there must be one primary and two secondary locations for each system which translates to 10,000 to 12,000 square feet of usable area. He stated that the note on the plat would allow DHHS the opportunity to monitor and determine whether these lots were acceptable for on-site systems. BOARD MEMBER BRADY noted that the previous soils tests were done in April, whereas these were done in December when the water table has less chance of fluctuating. MR. SAWHILL PLATTING BOARD MEETING PAGE 6 March 1, 1989 acknowledged this and stated that more tests are planned for this spring. BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES asked for Staff's comment regarding the note change suggested by the petitioner. MR. WEAVER stated that this would be substituting the Board's judgement for that of DHHS. He noted that the Board originally denied this plat and, at that time, DHHS wrote a strong letter of objection to this subdivision. He suggested that the Board could postpone the matter to allow the petitioner to work with DHHS. BOARD MEMBER KORTING asked for the petitioner to respond to the suggestion of a postponement. MR. SAWHILL stated that he would like a decision this evening. ALLEN MOORE, area resident, stated that this area was recently rezoned and the argument used by the owner to get that rezoning was that the property would not be developed without utilities and access would be via Greece Drive and not via Villages Scenic Parkway. He objected to vacating the easement: because there was an argument made during the rezoning that utilities would be developed and those would not be available to people on Villages Scenic Parkway if they did not come down Greece Drive. He stated that Villages Scenic Parkway/Potter Road has poor sight distance, so he felt the preferable alternative would be to have traffic access via Greece Drive. BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES asked if the owners promised during the rezoning that they would bring utilities to the Villages Scenic Parkway boundary. MR. SAWHILL was not at that public hearing. He was aware that utilities were a major. issue. He stated that it is not the intent of the developers to cut anyone off from utilities. He noted that AWWU requires the extension of utilities along the full length of the property when development occurs. BOARD MEMBER MAGBY noted that DHHS's comments state that only Test Pit 5 of the recent tests is acceptable. MR. SAWHILL stated that he had a meeting with them where he pointed out that Test Pits 3 and 7 were also acceptable and they suggested monitoring. The public hearing was closed. PLATTING BOARD MEETING PAGE 7 March 1, 1989 BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES moved for approval of the plat subject to the Staff conditions. BOARD MEMBER MAGBY seconded. BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES stated that she considered moving to change the note, but felt that the developers had made it clear to the neighbors that there would be utilities on this property. She noted also that Staff and DHHS recommended denial of this rezoning previously. She did not add a note regarding no access via Villages Scenic Parkway because it is not required, but was just suggested by the Planning and Zoning Commission. In response to a question from BOARD MEMBER KORTING, MR. WEAVER stated that it is not Staff's policy to recommend favorably for lots being created that cannot function on their own. However, Staff felt it was in the public interest in this case to approve this replat with conditions. BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES moved for approval of the vacations subject to filing a suitable replat within 18 months. BOARD MEMBER MAGBY seconded. BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES stated that she would vote against her motion because it would be premature until the surrounding properties have developed. BOARD MEMBER MAGBY noted that approval of these vacations would not be in accordance with the Municipal Vacation Policy. AYE: NAY: Kjelstad Hooyer, Brady, Korting, Johannes, Isaacs, Magby, Houston FAILED BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES moved for approval of the replat. BOARD MEMBER MAGBY seconded. BOARD MEMBER MAGBY spoke against the motion because he felt replatting would leave two lots which could not stand on their own merits. PLATTING BOARD MEETING PAGE 8 March 1, 1989 BOARD MEMBER JOHANNES stated that she could see no reason to deny the plat with the note that public sewer be provided before development occurs. She noted that there are partners who wish to split their interest in this property. BOARD MEMBER KJELSTAD also supported the motion stating that he hoped the petitioner could work with DHHS to develop the lots. BOARD MEMBER BRADY moved a substitute motion for approval of the replat subject to Staff condition #1, #2 "Placing a note on the plat indicating that. Lot 781 cannot be developed until aublic sewer is available," and adding #3 "Placing a note on the plat that Lot 7B2 cannot be developed until public sewer is availabe or additional soils tests are provided and yproved by DHHS." BOARD MEMBER KORTING seconded. BOARD MEMBER BRADY felt that the note suggested by Staff: was too restrictive, but he could see no objection to allowing the petitioner to work with DHHS. BOARD MEMBER MAGBY stated that the original intent of changing the zoning on this property was to make it an urban area and preclude the ill effects of an on-site system. He felt this substitute motion would be contrary to the best interests of the Municipality. To Substitute AYE: Hooyer, Brady, Johannes, Isaacs, Houston NAY: Magby, Kjelstad, Korting PASSED Substitute Motion AYE: Hooyer, Brady, Johannes, Isaacs, Magby, Houston NAY: Kjelstad, Korting PASSED 2. S -8702A Kempton Park Subd. Withdrawn January 25, 1989 TO: MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE MEMORANDUM Department of Economic Development and Planning Zoning and Platting Section FROM: Department of Health and human Services On -•site Services Section SUBJECT: Request for Comments on Subdivisions February 17, 1989 The Environmental Services Division, On-site Services, of the Department of Health and Human Services has reviewed the following cases and has these.comments: 85-80: John Wayne Subdivision Agreement - Two Time Extension No objection. 8-8753: Tracts 7B1, 7B2 The Villages Subdivision - with Vacation of R -O --W There have been at least thirteen soil tests performed on this piece of property. Of that number, six are old tests which show unsuitable soils, high ground water, or both. None of these tests includes water monitoring. Since the tests were performed in mid-April, it would be expected that the seasonal high water table is actually higher than shown. Of the recent test holes, only TP -5 is acceptable. The percolation results for TP -6 and TP-7are invalid and will need to be re -run according to the EPA falling head percolation test procedure. We will require a percolation evaluation on TP -4, particularly in the layers of ML material. TP -1 and TP -2 show unsuitable conditions for on• -site disposal. TP -3 may be acceptable provided platting does not object to cutting brush and trees in the screening easement when the sewer system is installed. There is a further concern, based on the tests submitted, that the water table on this lot may fluctuate, and that there may be new springs created when development occurs. The developer has failed to show how an original and two replacement systems may be constructed for each lot; in fact, it is doubtful that it can be shown. Because most areas have slopes in excess of 10%, seepage beds cannot be used. Due to tight soils and high ground water, it is doubtful that deep trenches will be practical. The overall picture is one of a lot with many areas of poor soils, complicated by the presence of an unpredictable and definitely fluctuating ground water Department of Economic Development and Planning January 25, 1989 Page Two S-8753: Continued: table. The developer has failed to show the availability of an adequate and safe potable water supply. If approved, the department will require the engineer to show (1) that each lot has the required amount of reserved area based on soil tests; (2) that additional soils tests are performed to prove the suitability of disposal sites; (3) that water monitoring continues monthly through April, then weekly through May; (4) that water availability is addressed. However, this department strongly recommends that the plat be denied. Susan Oswalt On-site Services SO/ljw PREVIOUS -TEST HOLES 86-1 1988 TEST PITS TP 1 KoOrrzaid61 0 h N 89° 57' 35°W • `, u' 1 • IO'UTIL IT'! VACATED. TEST HOLE LOCATION SKETCH / I. \'036-9 ft• 71-014 (Rev. 5/83) MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE OF HEALTH &ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Environmental Health Division CASE REVIEW WORKSHEET DEPARTMENT i \�' K. CASE NUMBER: 8-8753 DATE RECEIVED: January 21, 1989 COMMENTS DUE BY: February 17, 1989 SUBDIVISION OR PROJECT TITLE: , Tract 7B1, 7B2 The f i/illages Subdivision - with Vacation of R -O -W IA) K. �9/.. YR. �,,, ( ) PUBLIC WATER AVAILABLE ( ) PUBLIC SEWER AVAILABLE ( ) COMMUNITY WATER AVAILABLE COMMENTS: eg_s ,(/, sjo/ KC. (4 -_160 -4, -an/ �4 �(/ I"C /s 745/ c_N_e lei "_t, ____se r___g_ecky____4- tT. 7/5 L Cry -hiss, -,t -, 4 te'- a..., f d4 A. 4'c ,oectelot V u,,.' 46- i r_ 14 e(. a_A-u r9-1-/ >-/ c:-( , _a_v_06.4 4 /6: & C, i / - C} / 71-014 (Rev. 5/83) IELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING P.O. Box 6650 Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 OFFICE USE RECD BY VERIFY OWN A. Please fill in the information requested below. Print one letter or number per block. Do not write in the shaded blocks. 0. Case Number (IF KNOWN) 1. Vacation Code 0 270 0 20— 2$3 29 30 2. New abbrevia ed legal description (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOT 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOTS 34). 3. Existing abbreviated legal description (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOl 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOT 34) full legal on back page. T R 7 B T 11 E: V I L L A G E S 4. Petitioner's Name (Last - First) L 0 u N S B u R Y LORE N Address 723 West 6th Avpnue City - Anchorage State Aliaka Phone No. 6. Petition Area Acreage Bill Me X 7. Proposed Number Lots 2 L. 0 u N 5. Petitioner's Representative ID A S S 0 0 I A T E 5 Address >?_$ Wdlst: 6th Avenue City AnC110.ragP State Alaska Phone No 272-5451 Bill Me 6. Existing 9. Traffic 10. Grid Number 11. Zone Number Analysis Zone Lots b F R 12. Fee $ 510.00 13. Community Council B. I hereby certify that (I am) (I have been authorized to act for) the owner of the property described above and that I desire to subdivide it in conformance with Chapter 21 of the Anchorage Municipal Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the basic subdivision fee is nonrefundable and is to cover the costs associated with processing this application, that It does not assure approval of the subdivision. I also understand that additional fees may be assessed if the Municipality's costs to process this application exceed the basic fee. I further understand that assigned hearing dates are tentative and may be have to postponed by Planning Staff, Platting Board, Planning Commission, or the Assembly due to administrative reasons. Date: 31— 00 20-00:, Poor.! is ts) -81753I1 Signature 'Agents must provide written proof or authorization. ;ATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OFFICE USE EASEMENT APPLICATION REcoer: Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING VERIFY OWN' P.O. Box 6650 Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 A. Please fill in the information requested below. Print one letter or number per block. Do not write in the shaded blocks. ' 0. Case Number (IF KNOWN) 1. Vacation Code 2. Abbreviated Description of Vacation (EAST 200 FEET SOME STREET) i S 0 U T H 8 5 0 F E E T E 3. Existit g abbreviated legal clesc ip ion (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOT 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOT 34). 4. Petitioner's Name (Last - First) L 0 U LORE NSBLRY, N Address 723 West 6th Avenue City ANCHORAGE State ALASKA Phone No. Bill Me_X 6. Petition Area Acreage 10. Grid Number 12. Fee $ 100.00 5. Petitione 's Representative LOUNSBURY & ASSOCIATE Address 723 West 6th Avenue City ANCHORAGEState ALASKA Phone No 272-5451 7. Proposed Number 8. Existing Number Lots t—t—t-7 Lots 11. Zone EE Bill Me 9. Traffic Analysis Zone LE 6LLLLLLL 13. Community Council B. I hereby certify that (I am) (I have been authorized to act for) the owner of the property described above and that I desire to vacate it in conformance with Chapter 21 of the Anchorage Municipal Cocle of Ordinances. 1 understand that payment of the basic vacation fee is nonrefundable and is to cover the costs associated with processing this application, that it does not assure approval of the vacation. 1 also understand that additional fees may be assessed if the Municipality's costs to process this application exceed the basic fee. I further understand that assigned hearing dates are tentative and rnay have to be postponed by Planning Staff, Platting Board, Planning Commission, or the Assembly duelo administrative reasons. Date: �- 51 20-010 Font 14,051 gnature Agents must provide written proof or authorization. VACATION ,7USTIFI ANION Greece Drive Right• -of -Way Vacation Greece Drive Right -of -Way (ROW) exists, but has no road constructed at this time. There are no plans to construct this road and the property to the East does not intend to use Greece Drive for access. In fact, the neighborhood at the re -zone hearing for this property expressed a desire that this road not be constructed. Greece Drive is not required for adequate access to the two tracts being platted under this action. In the future these tracts may be further subdivided into a R-7 configuration with water and sewer. At that time their access would be from roads constructed across the property to the East, with no access to the Villages Scenic parkway. This ROW is in excess of Municipal needs, is not required for future development of the property to the East, and is not desired by the neighborhood. 33 -Foot Section Line Easement: A 33 -foot section line easement exists on the east boundary of Tract 7B. This easement serves no access or utility needs at this time and is not planned to in the future. This easement is in excess of public needs and should be vacated. 10 -Foot Utility Easement: A 10 -foot utility easement exists adjacent to the proposed ROW vacation. No utilities exist within this easement. This easement needs to be vacated and new easements provided to serve the new tract configuration. tz I; ALIVNIW113dd — oo ox\x • 37: n. \`\ y \ \• p V `. r s60 Ste\ 1 +1 to 'N ,cmL__.---'-----17-44 Co �j V ------ — \� \ \---4, �r - }T 5V•04'10M 565.0<5 CO l N S 0 Vi z Yo >m J0,i. c r, �1 z . G7 c.E Oa '�,'•' 11 -,c �i�, c 'to vc fl ii .mss N r CO C0 CO 0 0 l • 71-014 (Rev. 5/83) �� MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE / .tit DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION _ ` I Environmental Health Division Kill CASE REVIEW WORKSHEET CASE NUMBER: S-8753 DATE RECEIVED: September 21, 1988 COMMENTS DUE BY: October 17, 1988 SUBDIVISION OR PROJECT TITLE: Tracts 7B-1, 7B-2 The Villages C ) I 'A /14-6--,-- ( ) PUBLIC WATER AVAILABLE ( ) COMMUNITYITWATER AVAILABLE ( ) PUBLIC SEWER AVAILABLE COMMENTS: `/ .-(1)4-'1CiZ_t J 4-a4Lj ,, �� /J a,C- l_ t:t t t/ t trt.-4J 4-+n-t? ./. „2iLG-/'Yl. • A• C_4)44- 4e— ,,.L�� 71-014 (Rev. 5/83) PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING P.O. Box 6650 Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 OFFICE USE RECD BY: VERIFY OWN• A. Please fill in the information requested below. Print one letter or number per block. Do not write in the shaded blocks. 0. Case Number (IF KNOWN) 1. Vacation Code 2. New abbrevia ed legal description (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOT 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOTS 34). I L L A G E S 3. Existing abbreviated legal descrip ion (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOl 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOT 34) full legal on back page. T R 7 B T H E V I L L A G E S 4. Petitioner's Name (Last - First) LOUN S B U R Y f LORE N Address 723 West 6th Avenue 5. Petitioner's Representative 10 U N S B U R Y A S S 0 C I A T E S Address 723 West 6th Avenue City Anchorage Stateska City Anrhnrage State Alaska Phone No. Bill Me X Phone No 272-5451 Bill Me 6. Petition Area Acreage 6 7. Proposed Number Lots 2 8. Existing Number Lots [B. 9. Traffic Analysis Zone 1 10. Grid Number 11. Zone 3 6 3 7 R 12. Fee $ 510.00 13. Community Council B. I hereby certify that (I am) (I have been authorized to act for) the owner of the property described above and that I desire to subdivide it in conformance with Chapter 21 of the Anchorage Municipal Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the basic subdivision fee is nonrefundable and is to cover the costs associated with processing this application, that it does not assure approval of the subdivision. I also understand that additional fees may be assessed if the Municipality's costs to process this application exceed the basic fee. I further understand that assigned hearing dates are tentative and may be have to postponed by Planning Staff, Platting Board, Planning Commission, or the Assembly due to administrative reasons. Date: FJ -3I -es 20-003 Front (4,65) Signature -4-87 NOV 0 21988 *Agents must provide written proof or authorization. C. Please check or fill in the following: 1. Comprehensive Plan — Land Use Classification X Residential Commercial Parks/Open Space Transportation Related 2. Comprehensive Plan — Land Use Intensity Special Study 3. Environmental Factors (if any): a. Wetland b. Avalanche 1. Developable 2. Conservation c. Floodplain 3. Preservation d. Seismic Zone (Harding/Lawson) Marginal Land Commercial/Industrial Public Lands/Institutions Alpine/Slope Affected Industrial Special Study Dwelling Units per Acre 'd"I>1 Alpine/Slope Affected D. Please indicate below if any of these events have occurred in the last three years on the property. X Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Zoning Variance Case Number Case Number Case Number Case Number Enforcement Action For Building/Land Use Permit For Army Corp of Engineers Permit E. Legal description for advertising. TRACT 7B-1, 7B-2 THE VILLAGES NE's SECTION 15, T11N, R3W, S.M. F. Checklist Y, 30 Copies of Plat Reduced Copy of Plat (81/2 x 11) X Certificate to Plat 510.00Fee X X Topo Map 3 Copies Soils Report 4 Copies Aerial Photo Housing Stock Map Zoning Map Water: Sewer: X X X 20-003 Back (4.bbi X X Private Wells Private Septic Waiver Community Well Community Sys Public Utility Public Utility VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OFFICE USE EASEMENT APPLICATION RECO BY' Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING VERIFY OWN P.O. Box 6650 Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 A. Please fill in the information requested below. Print one letter or number per block. Do not write in the shaded blocks. 0. Case Number (IF KNOWN) 1. Vacation Code 2. Abbreviated Description of Vacation (EAST 200 FEET SOME STREET) S 0 U T H 8 5 0 F E E R E E C E D 3. Existing abbreviated legal descrip ion (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOT 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOT 34). f T R 7 4. Pe itioner's Name (Last - First) L 0 U N B L R Y L 0 R E N Address 723 West 6th Avenue City ANCHORAGE State ALASKA 5. Petitione is Representative LOUNSBU RYL& ASSIOICIIATIES� Address 723 West 6th Avenue City ANCHORAGE State ALASKA Phone No. Bill Me_. Phone No. 272-5451 6, Petition Area Acreage 10. Grid Number 3 6 3 7 12. Fee $ 100.00 7. Proposed Number 8. Existing Number Lots Lots BEE 11. Zone Bill Me 9. Traffic Analysis Zone 13. Community Council B. I hereby certify that (I am) (I have been authorized to act tor) the owner of the property described above and that I desire to vacate it in conformance with Chapter 21 of the Anchorage Municipal Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the basic vacation fee is nonrefundable and is to cover the costs associated with processing this application, that it does not assure approval of the vacation. I also understand that additional fees may be assessed if the Municipality's costs to process this application exceed the basic tee. I further understand that assigned hearing dates are tentative and may have to be postponed by Planning Staff, Platting Board, Planning Commission, or the Assernbly due to administrative reasons. Date' Sr 20-019 F,on1 (4/651 ygnature Agents must provide written proof or authorization. C. Please check or fill in the following: 1. Comprehensive Plan — Land Use Classification X Residential Marginal Land Commercial Commercial/Industrial Parks/Open Space Public Lands/Institutions Transportation Related 2. Comprehensive Plan — Land Use Intensity Dwelling Units per Acre 'fr=ce1° y1 Special Study Alpine/Slope Affected 3. Environmental Factors (if any): a. Wetland b. Avalanche 1. Developable 2. Conservation c. Floodplain 3. Preservation d. Seismic Zone (Harding/Lawson) Alpine/Slope Affected Industrial Special Study D. Please indicate below if any of these events have occurred in the last three years on the property. X Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Zoning Variance Case Number Case Number Case Number Case Number Enforcement Action For Building/Land Use Permit For • E. Legal description for advertising. TRACT 76-1, 76-2 THE VILLAGES Na SECTION 15 T11N R3W F. Checklist X X 30 Copies of Plat Reduced Copy of Plat (81/ x 11) X Certificate to Plat 100 Fee X Topo Map 3 Copies X Soils Report 4 Copies X Aerial Photo X Housing Stock Map X Zoning Map Water: X Private Wells Sewer: X Private Septic 9U4114 Rock 144151 Waiver Community Well Community Sys Public Utility Public Utility VACATION JUSTIFICATION Greece Drive Right -of -Way Vacation Greece Drive Right -of -Way (ROW) exists, but has no road constructed at this time. There are no plans to construct this road and the property to the East does not intend to use Greece Drive for access. In fact, the neighborhood at the re -zone hearing for this property expressed a desire that this road not be constructed. Greece Drive is not required for adequate access to the two tracts being platted under this action. In the future these tracts may be further subdivided into a R-7 configuration_ with water and sewer. At that time theiirlss would be from roads sanstmct-ed across £he property to the East, with no access to the Villages Scenic parkway. This ROW is in excess of Municipal needs, is not required for future development of the property to the East, and is not desired by the neighborhood. 33 -Foot Section Line Easement: A 33 -foot section line easement exists on the east boundary of Tract 7B. This easement serves no access or utility needs at this time and is not planned to in the future. This easement is in excess of public needs and should be vacated. 10 -Foot Utility Easement: A 10 -foot utility easement exists adjacent to the proposed 1JW vacation. No utilities exist within this easement. This easement needs to be vacated and new easements provided to serve the new tract configuration. MARK HANSEN P.E. Consulting Engineers Testing Laboratory 1-1CO2 BOX 7387, PALMER, AK 99643 (907) 745-4721 Jan. 11. 1989 Lounsbury and Associates 723 W. 6th Ave. Anchorage. Alaska 99501 Attn: Jim Sawhi I 1 S 8753 MAR 01 1989 Subject: Subsurface investigation for proposed resubdivision of Tract 713, The Villages Subdivision Gentlemen: Attached are the results of the subsurface investigation conducted at your request. The investigation included excavating and logging seven test pits and laboratory analysis of important soils encountered. Included with this transmittal are: Vicinity map Figure 1 Test hole location sketch Figure 2 Test Hole logs Sheets 1-7 Sieve Analysis Reports Sheets 8-12 MOA Soils log forms Sheets 13-16 Logs from Previous Investigation Appendix A It is trusted this information meets your present requirements. If you have any questions or if I may be of further assistance. please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Mark Hansen, P.E. iiI_ 1 JAN 1 81989 l MUNICIPALITY or APiCkORAGE PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION.._ MARK HANSEN P.E. Consulting Engineers Testing laboratory 1-1CO2 BOX 7387, PALMER. AK 99645 (907) 745-4721 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION TRACT 7B, THE VILLAGES Site Description The project site consists of 6 acres, on the East side of Villages Scenic Parkway, about 1/4 mile South of Potter Valley Road. The site is wooded with trees including Spruce, Birch and Alder. The only development on the site is associated with the construction of Villages Scenic Parkway along the west boundary. Greece Drive has not been constructed next to the site at the time of the exploration. A small borrow area (road cut) has been developed on the West edge of the lot. A cut bank about 15' high, exposing sand with gravel (SP), exists at that point. Test pit Al was excavated near the toe of the cut. A limited subsurface investigation was conducted by others in 1979 for an area including this site. Partial results are attached as Appendix 1. The areas investigated at that time had either shallow ground water or unfavorable percolation rates. This (1988) investigation concentrated on areas not covered by the previous study. It is the intention to resubdivide this lot into two equal parcels. The purpose of this investigation is to see if soils will support on-site wastewater disposal for the proposed two lots. Field and Laboratory Investigation Subsurface investigation was begun on 12-09-88 and completed on 12-13--88, using an International 630 backhoe operated by S and A Enterprises. Test pits were logged by Mark Hansen. The test pits were excavated to 16' depth, unless ground water or exceptionally dense soil was encountered at a shallower depth. The test pit logs describe the soil as observed in the field. Lounsbury and Associates Page Soils were classified and described using the Unified group symbols and group names outlined in ASTM D 2487. Samples of important soil strata were taken from the backhoe bucket. The samples may not entirely represent the coarser portion of the soil. The presence of large gravel, cobbles and boulders should be noted on the logs when interpreting sieve analysis results. The classification shown on the test hole logs may not always agree with sieve analysis, as the logs reflect the affect of the larger particles on the classification. The samples also do not represent stratification which causes the soil to be somewhat sorted in the field. Where appropriate, a 1" slotted PVC pipe was left in the hole to facilitate future ground water monitoring. Ground water was rechecked in each hole the day following excavation. Percolation tests were run adjacent to test pits #6 and #7. Future ground water monitoring will be performed by Lounsbury and Associates, and is to include monitoring through the spring thaw. The location sketch shows the test pit locations only schematically. Locations of the old (1979) holes were traced from information supplied by Lounsbury and Associates. No physical evidence of the old series of test holes was observed in the field. The new (1988) test hole locations are shown schematically on the sketch. These were located relative to the topography, but have not been located by survey methods. The 1" PVC pipes at the test hole locations are well marked for future location. For the percolation tests, a second shallower hole was excavated adjacent to the test pit using the backhoe. A 6" diameter by 1' deep percolation hole was hand dug in the bottom of the second hole for the percolation test. Two inches of pea gravel were placed in the small hole and the hole soaked overnight. The next day, the hole was refilled with water and the drop in water level monitored. Lounsbury and Associates Page 3 Findings Suitable soil for the construction of on-site wastewater soil absorption systems was identified in test pits #3, #5 and #7. Marginal but possibly usable soil was encountered in test pit #6. The soil types are quite variable within a small distance. The presence of shallow ground water over part of the site will be a constraint on the location of on-site wastewater disposal systems. The only observation of bedrock was in test pit #1. This pit was located at the toe of a cut bank, and the bedrock is estimated to be in excess of twenty feet below natural ground surface at that point. Based on initial observations, test pits #3, #5, #6 and #7 appear suitable from a ground water point of view. This needs to be confirmed after monitoring water depths through the spring thaw. The soil at usable depth in test pits 113 and #5 was free draining sand -gravel mixtures. No percolation tests are necessary to establish the suitability of this type of soil. Test pit #6 encountered dense glacial till. Percolation rate at 4' to 5' was 50 minutes per inch. The density and cobble content of this soil increases with depth to the point that excavation below 11' was discontinued. It would be impractical to construct a deep soil absorption system at the location represented by test pit #6. A shallow system at that location may be feasible, but the soil is less permeable than normally utilized for shallow systems. The soil at depths shallower than 6' at test pit #7 was Poorly graded Gravel with Sand (GP) as shown by sieve analysis of the sample removed from the percolation test. The soil was very dense and had nearly enough silt for a (GP -GM) Unified Classification. The soil at this location appears well suited for a shallow soil absorption system, but a deep system would be difficult to construct there, as the deep soil is difficult to excavate. Percolation rates are 9.1 minutes/inch at 3'-4', and 7.7 minutes/inch at 4.5'--5.5'. A C R-3 SL ^^»+» 2 3 R'|V SL ^O.^^n THIS PROJECT D PL< R-3 SL A.^w.* -70 VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 LO G OF TEST PIT PROJECT: Tract 7, The Villages, Anchorage, AK ELEVATION: (Bottoa of existing borrow pit) 0 F E R P LEGEND 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION T S H T x: X0.0-2.0, NES, Brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL (SP) :2.0-7.0, F4 brown GRAVELLY SILT' WITH SAND, hard, daap, varved with :Grey lenses, 4' boulder 2'-4', PI- (ML) Bedrac Water seep at 7' No monitor tube set O t TEST PIT NO. TPI DATE: 12/09/88 LOGGED BY: RMH "N" MOISTURE BLOWS/ SAMPLE TESTS FOOT NO. MARK HANSEN P.E. HCO2Box 7387 Palmer, Alaska 99645 (907) 745-4721 SHEET 1 LO G OF TEST PIT ELEVATION: F R LEGEND 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION S T D E P T H 4 6 PROJECT: Tract 7, The Villages, Anchorage, AK Pt 110,0-4.0, Brown PEAT, damp, soft, (Pt) SH ML 8, 4.0-7.0, F2 blue SILTY SAND, wet, (SM) ( (water seep at 7' X7.0-9.0, F4 tan GRAVELLY SILT WITH SAND, damp (HL) ,Bottom of exploration Set 1" PVC pipe ater at 1,4' on 12-10-88 TEST PIT NO. (IP 2_ DATE: 12/09/88 LOGGED BY: RNH MOISTURE BLOWS/ SAMPLE TESTS FOOT NO. MARK HANSEN P.E. HCO2Box 7387 Palmer, Alaska 99645 (907) 745-4721 SHEET` LO G OF TEST PIT PROJECT: Tract 7, The Villages, Anchorage, AK ELEVATION: DATE: 12/09/88 LOGGED BY: AMU D F E R P LEGEND 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT NO. TP3 T S H T 01 Pt : X0.0-2.0, Brown PEAT, dry, soft, lPt) 2 SP : X2.0-13.0, NFS brown to grey POORLY GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL, coarse : :sand, medium density, particles to 2", (SP) 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SP -SM : :13.0-16.0, F2 brown, grey, black and orange POORLY GRADED :SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVE:., wet to saturated, lightly cemented 1 :particles to 2" (SP -SM) 14' uring excavation 119oEtom of exploeiT 6 1W Left 20'x1" slotted PVC pipe Water at,_161..on 12-10-88 Backfill overfilled approx. 1.5 "N" MOISTURE BLOWS/ SAMPLE TESTS FOOT N0. MARK HANSEN P.E. HCO2Box 7387 Palmer, Alaska 98645 (A07) 745-4721 SHEET LO G OF TEST PIT ELEVATION: D F E R P LEGEND 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION T S H T 10 11 1 GP 1 111.0-12.0, NFS brown POORLY GRADED GRAVEL WITH SAND, (Hardpan) 1partialy cemented, very dense (GP) 12 PROJECT: Tract 7, The Villages, Anchorage, AK Pt 10,0-2.0, Brown PEAT, soft, (Pt) TEST PIT N0. TP4 DATE: 12/10/88 LOGGED BY: RMH "N" MOISTURE BLOWS/ SAMPLE TESTS FOOT NO. GM 1 2.0-4,0, F1 brown SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND, low to medium density, 1 particles to 4", (GM) SP : :4,0-7.0, NFS brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL, coarse and medium (sand sizes, trace coal, layers dip sharply west. (SP) i \ Water at) do one side of hole while excavating. fno-ate an other side ML 117.0-8.0, F4 brown SILT, varved, stiff, n.p. to41-, dips west, (ML) GM : X8.0-11.0, F1 brown SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND, damp, high density, 1 :few cobbles and boulders, particles to 12", (GM) ::Bottom of expIoratton12' Left 1" slotted PVC pipe Water at 7.5' on 12-11-88 14.6% 12.22% 23.6% MARK HANSEN P.E. HCO2Box 7387 Palmer, Alaska 99645 (907) 745-4721 SHEET 4 LO G OF TEST PIT ELEVATION: D F E R P LEGEND 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION T S H T PROJECT: Tract 7, The Villages, Anchorage, AK Pt 1 10.0-1.0, Brown PEAT, dry, soft, (Pt) TEST PIT NO. TP5 DATE: 12/10/88 LOGGED BY: RHH "N" MOISTURE BLOWS/ SAMPLE TESTS FOOT NO. GP 11,0-9.0, NFS, brown POORLY GRADED GRAVEL WITH SAND, (GP), becoming I ;WELL GRADED GRAVEL WITH SAND (GW) by 8', density decreases with depth ;sharp and subrounded particles to 6" 4, 9.5%; 10 11 6W SP 1 19.0-12.0, NES brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL, particles to 2" 1(SP) 12 GP 1112..0-15.5, NFS, POORLY GRADED GRAVEL WITH SAND, low to medium density 11" maximum size (GP) 13 14 15: _.i4C— 1 1T1,5-16.0, F4, brown STtT varvea with cobbles and sawn lenses (NL) 16 I 1 1B-ottom of expinafion 10 No water during excavation Left20'xl"_slotted.PVC_ pipe No water on 12-11-61N'`) 2.7%1 21M,A. 6.0%1 24.6%1 3;1.A, 41 MARK HANSEN P.E. HC 02 Box 7387 Palmer, Alaska 99645 (907) 745-4721 SHEET 5 LO G OF TEST PIT ELEVATION: D F E R P LEGEND 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION T S H T PROJECT: Tract 7, The Villages, Anchorage, AK X0.0-2.0, Brown PEAT, damp, soft, (Pt) � f 12.0-3.0, F4 tan SANDY SILT, damp, trace gravel (ML)' SM 13.0-11,5, F2, brown/tan SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL, damp, few cobbles to 8", high density, density increasing with depth, sharp and subrounded :particles (SM). Grades to SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND, (GM), transition :not distinct. 10 1 GM :Difficult to excavate below 11' :Bottom of exploratron II -S' No water during excavation Left 1" slotted PVC piper No--water_on.12-11-88- \ Moved 10' SW and ran perc. test 4.0'-5.0'. 50 minutes/inch TEST PIT NO. TP6 DATE: 12/10/88 LOGGED BY: RMH nNn MOISTURE BLOWS/ SAMPLE TESTS FOOT NO. 13.1% 8.6% MARK HANSEN P.E. HCO2Box 7387 Palmer, Alaska 99645 (907) 745-4721 SHEET 6 LOG OF TEST PIT ELEVATION: D F E R P LEGEND 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION T S H T 01 Pt PROJECT: Tract 7, The Villages, Anchorage, AK 10.0-1,0, Brown PEAT, damp, soft, (Pt) GP TEST PIT NO. TP7 DATE: 12L12186 LOGGED BY: RHH "N" MOISTURE BLOWS/ SAMPLE TESTS FOOT NO. 1.0-6.0, NFS brown POORLY GRADED GRAVEL WITH SAND, very dense, trace silt, Subrounded and sharp particles to 12" (GP, nearly GP -GM) GM 10 6,0-11,0, F1, brown SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND, (GM) occasional cobbles and boulders to 18", rounded, subrounded and sharp particles high density, density increasing with depth, (GM) Difficult to excavate below 10' 11 1 :W6f[ m of exploraflinT11.0 No eater during excavation Left 1" slotted PVC pipe —Nlwafee on 12=f3=08�' _� --Maved=5'9 Wnd ram-pend.tests 3,0'-4.0'. 9.1 minutes/inch and 4.5'-5.5', 7,7 minutes/inch 7,7% 5.5% 7,9% 12 (Pert) MARK HANSEN P, E. HCO2Box 7387 Palmer, Alaska 99645 (907) 745-4721 SHEET CUM. PASS. ! 11 I O H tot,' o. c1 g 0, Q, �T n1 h Z. V) II � —I p U.S. STD. SIEVE 1 I I o i IHDI3M A9 U39UV00 1N30 U3d :iii re llli I1111 111 C HYDROMETER ANALYSIS GRAIN SIZE IN M. M. :1111 WHIM I IN111 1111/11111 yr:: 11111 1 1 111.11111111111M III=Ii11111 coo. 900'.1..1 11 .n111. 1. ■ ' to,' moor eoa.n.. C�......n. H..o.. ■ a� ■■■■■�. 'll _ :Iii °°Z 1 IHIIINIIIHIIIIIIII iiiiiii III=III 111 11111111.111111=11111 11..1.111111. In■■n■■■.U.■ 1111111 11111111 IIIIII 111111111111111111IHIIIIII !num 1n ■■. uhIIIIlHIblIIII ■■■' 111 ■■■■■..•■.p...■f■■.hs■■■ ■.■1■■ III HIlIlOiiIiimiimio. iii imiiiiiiiiii 111 11 1/111111 111.111111 bullet. 7 Nit. II II40ill II 111Q 1 .11 90 niuimiliii°° c'c ^c SIEVE nANALYSIS xuiuc iu iucucs I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD !ipighomippoir I 1.. 1 1 NIi I�I '°� mit "'Nniil "' i iiiiiriiuu mliu INi i m y IIHIIO�IHIIIIIOIU111HIIIII11IHOJ1I1L'h"!z :imam: 111111111 11111111111 1111 1 111. IIII Ni II III. =1iiilll IP rill ■�11111 .11. 111if 1 n _ 111111111 I P011 1111 11 ° 1 11 11 CIIIII N III I MINI _� NIN9 v :1 I I I li'I111111 I II I I Nom Ilrillllll111NN1 I 11 ° 11111 u 1 'ii� Z,,1 iii iii iuIN IIIN imp HOilIIlIlI ,£iiii 111111111111111 NI 111 mgII INIIIIN I INS li 111 Nlll 11 LII ! IIIIili111111111 1111111 IIIIII°, z,,1111 Alii 11111 IIN 1 11 1111 oz Z 11111 11 �_ 1 1 1� iiili..1n111111i 111 1 11111 1��°9 WIz11111 %i = 'I 'il 1e ll"! II iii in�n i I IIIIII�11s 001 I I II /1111111 1 IIIIIN 11I0I �II IIIIIIINIII 9 1 1111111 11111 111 NIIIIIIIII 11.°Z m 0 pm 0 0 �J 0 0 0 0 0 o m o n a 11013M A0 U3NI4 1N30 03d ') I O. w n t` c OD 0 ..--' . 7 11- "- T- HI 1 r 1 1 1 7 -Y+- 100. zoo •L ' I I 4 coo. r1 i rl L"-' inn ' 1 tO0 N } tom _Li .� „ -1 -I' fl J T £W' ■ .. 1 ■.�■■ ■■ 900' Q E.: ■ • 7 ■■ 4. j T ■ I■ J a ea: •138 ■■■ ■oo' HYDROMETER GRAIN SIZE N 0 3 O S O° 111 111 111 H■ 1 1111111111111111 111111111111 mum= ■■■H■ 111111 N porno IIIIIIIm HII1IHIIIIUI ■■■■■■H■ 1111111111111111111 11111 111111 MIN ■ 1111111 WWI 1111 u II ■ ............. ■■■■ H.■ 11111 ■■■ n11n1111 ■■H!■H .■. ■ .'� it .H ....... L ■�_ I ■■■ Jim ■ 1111 H■ ■ i H 111 . N ■111I11IIIIIIrP 111 .. .!IIlmimibilili"II1 1 11111��gqnnln 11 11 11 Q 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER_ 0 \Y • o 0 tl tC ill i 1 11111 Illnl u ioiiiouiiiIiiiiUN I III�InNnl ohlIiIIdIpjflflM III II Illllll u111n111� Illlllnn 1 N nnl 111 1 i�� 1 In 111111111 I , 1N ) �T T _ CO .40 al 4rN � M 00f I Atli SIZE IN MILLIMETERS W IlIIul Iullllolllllll 1 1111111 IIIIII n I iIuluhInuin VII1111111 I' 1 1 1 lIIIIp111 11111111 uulllllul •n:;illl 111111111 lull" 11 'i9I oo� uuuuuIIn� go 1 1•• 9 ■�� `IiIIIIII 11111 1 is m II IIH� illillaidthII 1 Illlul IIc 11 11111111 Mil 1 O 0 O O o , m 1` 0 ,c; M1 N 1NO13M AB 8 3NIA 1N33 Uri OD 0 ry o z�' 0) • GA .C1 1-1 FS1Q ,i, .4a U� o;us!rM�Pr,p o! 0" av m \I 1' 1 i v, c1 U.S. STD.I SIEVE N=— .QI\N �1 V. 1 I— m � O O N O a{ O 00 8 114913M AO o O 03911,103 1N33 O n 434 O 00 0 O °0T�I ,p11II11r �ivy �° HYDROMETER ANALYSIS GRAIN SIZE IN N. M. Z°0'1 111 • 11 111111 11 £°° w 1 7- 111 111 u 111111 1 1,1 1 I111■Iiu s`�: £� ■ 111 900 11 1 IH 1 1 �11 900' 9°° o ....I1,.. ...... 0�. •■ ■■ ■■■ ■d■■■■ N■■ nhiuiliiiui 111 111111 1 111111 IHHZ° liii!llIlhHfI III 1111 IIIA 1 IIII 111111 IH II II IIHIHMIIII 1111111111 Ia111 11 IINIS11 11 1111 £0 9° 11ui11 1111 1 11 1I1II11 1111 .1991-_ 111 ■■1 •1- ■t■1n■�■■1_ N �1�.�90 ooi 1l I 1 , - -■_■' iiillhli -- --= eo SIEVE ANALYSIS Jnr nr cloning': IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD 001 ■ ■ Iii ill o111 1s. 09 iuiu I . 1■III III II 11 . " IIF 0£ u�ul 11111111 11 I . _ i _9 °� II 1 MI 91 qi, �%■■ �1. III 'u ■■■11 ■ �j� 1£ Y ? ° Y Y/1 9 9 v ■ —°1 a 0 a 8,£ ,r Z 1II 11 ,111111 11 II �� lla 11 11 II I I li�0 y,1I 11 II11111111 1 III" 111 1.111°9 : 111 1 11111111111 1 1 = 1 111!°9 4c11 11 ••• 11 N 11 ■ 1 1N■■N°9 1 1111111 1001 11 111! + 1111 111111/1 11111 1 ii 11111 II MII1 111., OU 'J o m m r e n N 1H013M Al 133HId 11430 113d 11' Consulting Engineers (907) 745-4721 1iCO2 BOX 7387, PALMER, AK 99645 01 D; W 1- W 0 >- t7) N N a z a N z 4 cc 0 w LLI 0) AO' £00 wo' SOO' 900 too' 900• 8i. w £0 90 90 00 w 0 0 0 0 1 0 14 00 01 0 -3 m csi 0) 1HDI3M A9 113'fiK00 114f) Had 0 O 0 n W 0 0 0 —Tnh 4 Ill I r r hIl l +Hid 00 400 III 111 11 I r .111111 4, i ■■ ■■r■■■■■■■■ / nnu■■■ 1 ■io■p = o i Y ■■■/N1■H H:02: ■::.. :. .:. ....�. 1111111111 MIIIIMILINIMM11111111119011O1 1111 II nibi010l. 11111I�11I111111111h1==I1111I1111!1I1111111■ ■■■■ U■ ■■I■I�■II■■ IIS oil■air 90 ■ ��// ■■ /■■■■//■■■■■ IjflIHfl IN /!1■■ . N/ imph ■■■■/ ■!NN is:i.0 ' _■ I11 ihiliiluil PPIIP! i Pi Pihrdp..,2 ■ ■N ■ ■ ■ IIN11111imil Nan wil: gl111N 1111111N 1 11111 1 1111 .1 I ■ � _;B ■■ IIiiHiIuipriiooii ■■■ ■V■■I■■ I IIIOPIIIIII 2 I 1Y 11 �- i1.' } -L 9 atm .. 1 1 nil 0 IDI 111 II11011 n N-D2l I III. Hi 1I_I'••••r••'•mn' ■lIiIIiIiiOiro 11 11l� viii 11n♦1109 1 ■■■=00 ■�� a111111111111IIE �� 11l11111111ll1I� � I�� 1111� ■11111 ■ ■■ 1 t' ,IiNI=11 1111 11 I1 1 11 1 11 Ill 0111fill.... . 0Y 0 0 9 0 9j 2 2 O 0 0 0 0 •0 0 O 0, N 0 I p 1HD13M A9 H3HIi DOD H3d 2 w w_ U) 0 M U CO A 4C,1 • S] u 0 01 T 7 - i wo. %at ‘0 :%, cn N TTr 03 • N M O O 0 R1, V O N v CO I 0 0 N Cd w w T 01 iH013M AR p O N A ? U SUVOI 1N30 N3d op �O1 W G P p uxr. H t I 1lill n1 ,_rr� 1111 innt �1111l o 1 - Ism 11H1 um /111111/ 11111111L1 •li= . 900 ma1111u111 111u111 11111 1n mw sr 1.1..1111 ....1 1.1..1..11 11 u.o 100' •wH .n .fly �•u W' ■ s�•.NN•nu •fl•u 1 -' .n. •Ce•• A N�N�yY 111111111111111 III 111111111111111111 1111111111111111111110 III 1111111111 1111111111 :I111111111111111111111=11111111=11111 1118 111111111111' IN=111 1 1 11 1=i 111=II III. So.1 ■ 111111 11111 111 11n111 11 1 1111 1 1n 90 n1..11 111111 ...n1.i..1 11 ..1l..li�n min n Doi ooiiiui oiio 11n r �e imi iiiiiiil I iii ii iu 1 ii�nii'i' ern 11111111ul 1 I u " 11111111111 1111111 1 1 0o n Of 1 Pr 71 0Z 91 III 111 1 1 11111 111 1 IIIIIIJPi1 III LI 6 r '- : 9:W I 1 111 11 110111111 1 111 iliiiii Lll 11111 II 11111 1 11 111 Z�'11111 IIll!ill 111 1 1 1 1� 11111111111111 iiii .111111111111 111 '1111111 Ii n11'"'11n1'eIi 1 1 1 III 1 III 111=p 11 I i' I I ro'pi'ipiu1u oHI1111 1111 1111111 111111111111 _-- O O mO b 0 O N O O o m e IHOI3M A9 83N13 11137 N3d Cd w w T 01 PERFORMED FOR: __- Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 82.5 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST 1;j LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DEPTH (FEET) Yt r 5f -3M COMMENTS (ENGINEERS SEAL). >. 17 ..“4teealioaoaa 4 //}}` ,7 r, 4/noe ii0,.. rv41142Nrl DATE PERFORMED Township, Range, Section: . . PUG Skritu 1 co e:: k SLOPE WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? Vie) IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? 5 r' 0 F' E Depth to Water Al er Monitoring? y'. 5 Dale IL-10 SITE PLAN d Reading Date Gross Time Ne Time Depth o Water Net Drop N• ir1 r PERCOLATION RATE (minutes/inch) PERC HOLE DIAMETER TEST RUN BETWEEN _ FT AND JC :u.0 i(�)'`r t 1'([tL.. cep ,o c 46 5,ott ("1161/3:1 FT PERFORMED BY: )4c» /Mil) CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE. DATE: 72-008 (Rev. 4185) SHEET 13 II i, -............÷......—. `1 r / b, 7-r , / - r- K. d Reading Date Gross Time Ne Time Depth o Water Net Drop N• ir1 r PERCOLATION RATE (minutes/inch) PERC HOLE DIAMETER TEST RUN BETWEEN _ FT AND JC :u.0 i(�)'`r t 1'([tL.. cep ,o c 46 5,ott ("1161/3:1 FT PERFORMED BY: )4c» /Mil) CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE. DATE: 72-008 (Rev. 4185) SHEET 13 PERFORMED FOR: it Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502.0850 SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 . 1 DEPTH (FEET) 1J-7- Jr 2 - 2- 3 • 3• 4 5- 6- 7• 8- G w 10- 11 12 DATE PERFORMED:• 7 ;; T1 pa, . , Township, Range, Section::, U,,./. 4 n 13- j' 14- 15 16 17 NV- - SLOPE t.� WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTEERED? IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? geplh to Water Alter Monitoring? '•• 'Al'"— gale' •— S 0 P E SITE PLAN k N iN C Reading Date Gross Time Ne Time Depth to Water Net Drop 1, Poi:, PERCOLATION RATE _—_ (minutes/inch) PERC HOLE DIAMETER TEST RUN BETWEEN FT AND _ _FT COMMENTS ;.. i'.0 /)i/T Jtif <.�•. s: i.L c,'.. ,y S;( . J / PERFORMED BY: rli / iK t{41 )' CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE. DATE: 5-? SHEET 14 PERFORMED FOR: el Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 SOILS -LOG,— PERCOLATION TEST (ENGINEERS SEAL) G Ain DATE PERFORMED:. - !^ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Township, Range, Section: 75 '"iuJ k SLOPE SITE PLAN WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? —i3 IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? Depth to Water Aller Monitoring? AIA- J' i. Date. S L 0 P 4 4 IJ i r'4 l'- Reading Date Gross Time Ne Time Depth to Water Net Drop 7 i, -//_ .!O d5 — -. r 0 ter. i ..-.-rJ 5S PERCOLATION RATE 5G _ (mmulesri ich) PERC HOLE DIAMETER TEST RUN BETWEEN u FT AND 5 _FT COMMENTS St t So -I; ; c:9+.7.';.l',i It CI , i :v !. /J., .w: , PERFORMED BY: %\✓I'`k 1 r✓(�' - CERTIFY II-IA1 THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE. DATE: r` 't SHEET 15 PERFORMED FOR Municipality of Anchorage DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 7 6, ` !;/;ll(.m. ) DEPTH (FEET) r 2 3• 4- 5- 6 Gr 7- 8- 9- 10- 11 G 12- 13- 14- 15- 16 - 17- 18 - 19- 20 h 1, (ENGINEERS SEAL) DATE PERFORMED: i L- it �?? Township, Range, Section SLOPE 1 • WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? N: IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? S L 0 P Depth to Water Alter Monitoring? Dat • ) . SITE PLAN 7 Reading Date Gross Time Ne Time Depth to Water Net Drop /1-`/J-- IL/ /3 _ _., O',,., J -1J, i�m.C. ,'l,;a-. .., 1.3' 10, l /•d % 9. j 'r0 t JS r .— :715I 1: 1-4, 6, i.. '- S y,ii f )•E i, 3. PERCOLATION RATE :1_1/7• (minuteslmch) PERC HOLE DIAMETER _ TEST RUN BETWEEN 5 COMMENTS . c ?,C r_: l.i. -rx27 ,1 50./1- rr'.);4- FT AND C FT `9.l l'„ai/i tr, f.. �•:r� 7.7 nt,”/);.c f.5; c' PERFORMED BY: `/I' •-` -/' '' 1 974-c-114/'"---- CERTIFY THAI THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE, DATE: 'fit - SHEET 16 APPENDIX A CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 'erformed for LHKM ,egal Description: Lot 'his Foran reports: SOILS TEST 1st Test Hole Depth Feet Soil Date Performed 4/19/79.. :Block Tract 7B Subdivision The V,•11ages yes PERCOLATION TEST Characteristics Peat Gray Silty Sand (wet) 4 0' — Bottom of Test Hole Was Ground Water Encountered_ ves If YES, What depth? 6' s� ce n C6 I 1 Reading Date Gross Time Net Time 1 1 1 1,1 d , •. 1 1 J I t -r I t 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 i f -r -i 1 I 11 Percolation. Rate Proposed -Installation: - Depth of Inlet COXYLENTS: - -Wr er table to high Minute SEEPAGE PIT Depth to Potton of Pit or Trench for on-site sRp_tic system - DRAIN FIELD Test Performed by David Paul Data Certified By:Constructicn Test Lab Date '4/25179 Reading Date Gross Time Net Time Depth to H2O Net Drainage I J J • 1 1 J Percolation. Rate Proposed -Installation: - Depth of Inlet COXYLENTS: - -Wr er table to high Minute SEEPAGE PIT Depth to Potton of Pit or Trench for on-site sRp_tic system - DRAIN FIELD Test Performed by David Paul Data Certified By:Constructicn Test Lab Date '4/25179 CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 'erformed for LHKM Date Performed 4/19/79 .egal Description: .Lot 1 __B1ockTract 7B Subdivision The Villages ':his Fort reports: SOILS TEST yes PERCOLATION TEST 2nd Test Hole Depth Feet 2' Z2' Soil Characteristics Peat Bworn sandy grE.vel -we C^ 4471- / y � Brown silty sandy gravel • Bottom Test Hole Was Ground Water Encountered_ yes If YES, What depth? 6.5' tr yo Percolation Rate Proposed Installation: Depth of Inlet COMMENTS: • -water table to high for oh-sita_Septic systr*n Minute SEEPAGE PIT DRAIN FIELD Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench Test Performed by David Paul Data Certified Bv: c ruthr_ ct1Q' Ter` Teb Date '4!25/79 Reading Date Gross Time Net Time Depth to H2O Net Drainage 7 Percolation Rate Proposed Installation: Depth of Inlet COMMENTS: • -water table to high for oh-sita_Septic systr*n Minute SEEPAGE PIT DRAIN FIELD Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench Test Performed by David Paul Data Certified Bv: c ruthr_ ct1Q' Ter` Teb Date '4!25/79