HomeMy WebLinkAboutT11N R3W SEC 15 Plat# 86-012 The Villages MUNICIPA[.ITY OF ANCHORAGI= DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Environmental Health Division C.&SE REVIEW WORKSHEET CASE NUMBER: 86-012 SUBDIVISION OR PROJECT TITLE: A request to rezone approxmately 60 acres from R-6 to R-iA S.L. and R-3 S.L. ( ) PUBLIC WATER AVAILABLE ( ) PUBLIC SEWER AVAILABLE ( ) COMMUNITY WATER AVAILABLE CAS E: PETITIONER: REQUEST: TOTAL AREA: LOCATI ON: CURRDqT ZONE: Community Council) Federation of Co~unity Councils) gb3/bfl CASE NO. RETURN CO~-~ENTS TO: MUNICIPAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT Zoning and Platting Division Pouch 6-650 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 26g-g215 request to rezone approximane!y 6~) acres from A request to amend Title 21 to A request for conceot/final approval of a conditional use to permit a in the zone. A request for an amendmenn to a conditional use A site plan revie~.~ for COMMENTS: Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing Dane: Comments Due: I - DISTRIBUTI0~I: STANDARD DISTRIBUTION (Public Projects) Urban Beautification Commission (O~d~n.anqe A~endm~_~s)Municipal Attorney's Office ~~g~D~-~ (~f~'~ Community Council Federation o~ Community Councils gbl/ng6 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION OFFICE USE Municipality of Anchorage REC'O BYi"L ,~'~¢/ DFPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING ~ P.O. Box 6650 VSRIFY OWN~ ~.~~'''~- '-~ !~''' Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 Zoning Map Amendments require at a minimum 1.75 acres of land or a boundary common to the requested zoning district. The application must also be signed by 51% of the property owners in the area to be rezoned. A. Please fill in the information requested below. Print one letter or nurC~dep o~r bJock. Do not write in the shaded blocks. 1. Case Number (IF KNOWN) 2. Petitio'ning for' "r ~ Abbreviated legal description (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOT 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOTS 34-45) full legal on back page. 4, Petitioner's Name (Last- First) 5. Petitioner's Representative H erschba olhl Icl lalrlel. 101el I I I l lelhlalnl I"lilklel I I I I I I I I I I Address 723 I~. 6th Ave. Address 2220 E. 88th Ave. City .._.Andho rage State AK Phone No. 272-545"i Bill Me X City Anchorage State AK Phone No. 344,-0662 Bill Me 6. Current Zoning 9. Traffic Analysis Zone 7. Petition Area Acreage 8. Grid Number 10. Hearing Date 11. Principal Tax Number 12. No. Tax Parcels 13. Fees 1 ,500 14. Community Council Rabbit Creek B, I hereby certifl/that (I am) (I have been authorized to act for) the owner of the property described above and that I desire to rezone it in conformance with Chapter 21 of the Anchorage Municipal Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the basic rezoning fee is nonrefundable and is to cover the costs associated with processing this application, that it does not assure approval of the rezoning. I also understand that additional fees may be assessed Jt the Municipality's costs to process this application exceed the basic fee. I further understand that assigned hearing dates are tentative and may have to be postponed by Planning Staff, Planning Commission, or the Assembly due to administrative reasons. Signature 'Agents must provide written proof or authorization. 20-Oo2(Sev. 3/85) R-3 SL ~, O. 84'21 .?. 2O 17 P~OPOSED ZONING AMENDMENT The following properties are proposed to be rezoned from R-6 to R-3 SL: 1) 2) N 1/2 NE 1/4 NE 1/4 NE 1/4 Sec. 15, T 11 N, R 3 W, S.M. Tracts 7A,7B, 8C and 12, Villages Subdivision and the following properties are to be rezoned from R-6 to R-IA SL: 1) 2) 3) Tracts 8A, 8B, 9, 13A, 13B, 13C, Villages Subdivision Lots 1 - 9 Pineridge Subdivision Lots 1 - 3 Village Parkway Estates The Special Limitations are specified on the pages which follow and the purposes for the Special Limitations are consistent with those approved for adjacent properties in Ordinance AO 84-21 approved by the Municipality on April 10, 1984. ~mitatio~: The zoning map amendment requested includes special limitations for the following purposes: 1) To prohibit structures, or uses of land or structures, that would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or conflict with the Comprehensive Plan under ~napter 21.05. 2) To conform the zoning map a~ndment to the Comprehensive Plan in the manner required by Chapter 21.05, or to further the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 3) To conform development under t~ zoning map amendment to existing (or permitted) patterns of development in the surrounding neighborhood. (1) A.O. 84-~1 PLI R-3 SL A.O, 84-21 TR /0 T~' I I PLI (11 15 20 A.O. 8' the recording of negative easements, development rights transfers, or covenants, conditions and restrictions governing the use of the site; the posting of a performance guarantee for the provision of site improvements as provided in Anchorage Municipal Code 21.87.030. Site Plan review shall consist of two phases. The first phase will review a Master Site Plan to locate the public facilities infrastructure, demonstrate residential density distribution patterns, establish general phasing plans and buffering. The second phase will review a Final Site Plan to establish the final details of the project. A Master Site Plan is subject to approval by ~e Planning and Zoning Commission after a Public Hearing. Notice of the Public Hearing shall be given in the manner provided for zoning map amendments. A Final Site Plan is subject to approval by the Director of Community Planning without a public hearing in the same manner as a cluster housing development Final Site Plan under Section 21.45.1901.2.h(1). Upon the applicant's request, the Planning and Zoning Commission may combine a Final Site Plan review with its review of a Master Site Plan. No building or structure shall be constructed or placed on the property and no existing vegetation on the property shall be cleared except in accordance with a site plan approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with this section and the provisions incorporated by reference herein. Prior to that approval, the Planning Director may approve specific limited clearing of vegetation (3) The Special Limitations shall: Require compliance with design standards for structures and other site features; b. Require compliance with a site plan; de Require construction and installation of improvements, includi~g public facilities (a~ private expense); and Limit residential densities. ~2_$LPropertiea: R-3 SL Properties shall be subject to the following Special Limitations establishing design standards for tl~e property: ae DEVELOPMENT SHALL C~NFORM TO A SITE PLAN REVIEWED AND APPI~OVED AS FOLLOWS: The authority designated by ordinance shall review the site plan in accordance with the standards in these special limitations. The authority reviewing a site plan may impose conditions upon the approval of the site plan that it finds necessary to: Conform the site plan to the standards in these special li~dtations; or Enforce the development of the site in accordance with the site plan, including but not limited to, requiring: (2) treated as an application to the Planning and Zoning Commission for Master Site Plan approval. B. MASTER SITE PLAN Submission Ra~luirem~nts: The applicant shall submit 18 copies of the Master Site Plan to the Community Planning Department, supported by a narrative identifying the considering principal environmental constraints and major engineering/design features affecting development, and documenting tdqe ~provements required to develop the project in accordance with the standards in this section. TO the extent practicable, these constraints and design considerations shall be indicated on the site plan. Before subm[tting the Master Site Plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant shall submit the pl~u% to any Community Council whose boundaries contain part of the area subject to the site plan. The Community Council will have 30 days to review and con~uent upon the site plan, or a longer time agreed upon by the Applicant and the Council. c. The site plan shall generally identify: the type, availability and location of public facilities and utilities; the total number of proposed dwelling units; the location, distribution and density of housing types; for utility placements, access road construction, soil testing, well drilling, surveying or to collect other data necessary for plan approvals which he finds will not circumvent the intent of these special limitations. A Notice of Zoning Action shall be recorded with the District Recorder's Office within 30 days of Assembly approval of this ordinance to provide notice that these parcels are regulated by the Special Limitations of this section. A legal description and the approval number of dwelling units shall be included for every tract or parent tract. No building permit may be issued prior to recording this notice. An application to modify a site plan shall be reviewed in the same manner as an application for site plan approval, provided that if the reviewing authority determines that the proposed modifications to a Master Site Plan will have minimal off-site impacts, no public healing on the modification is required. The authority that approved a site plan may modify the site plan: When changed conditions cause the site plan no longer to conform to the standards in these special limitations. To implement a different development plan conforming to the standards in these special limitations. An appeal from a decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding a site plan under these special limitations shall be brought in accordance with Section 21.30.010-.100. An appeal from a decision of the Community Planning Director on Final Site Plan Approval shall be (4) The site design shall reflect hydrology, wind conditions, soil and bedrock conditions and other environmental factors. The total number of dwelling units in the area subject to the site plan shall not exceed 3 to 6 dwelling ur~its per acre° The site plan shall conform to the standards for public facilities and open space in Attac~nent A, incorporated by reference here~. C. FINAL SITE PLAN 1. Submission raquirements Unless a Final Site Plan and a Master Site Plan have been scheduled for common review, a Final Site Plan may be submitted only after a Master Site Plan for the subject property has been approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The submission requirements for a Final Site Plan are the same as for a cluster housing development Final Site Plan under Section 21.45.190 I 2 (g). 0 Any elements of the Public Facilities and Open Space Design Standards not fully resolved in the Master Site Plan shall be satisfied in the Final Site Plan Approval. A final site plan need not address all of the property included within the Master Site Plan. (7) site design measures necessary to minimize impacts to adjacent areas and critical environmental features, to ensure proper service to the area of development, and to illustrate compliance with the Design Standards; the configuration and final ownership of the proposed open space and roadway circulation systems. 2. Design Standards Re No site plan shall be approved under this section unless it conforms to the following policies in addition to the applicable provisions of Title 21: The site plan shall conform to the Comprehensive Plan in the manner provided byAnchorage Municipal Code Chapter 21.05, and conform to the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan, including the transition area standards of Technical Report #3 of the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan. Existing vegetation shall be retained unless its removal is specifically approved as provided in these special limitations. Natural vegetation supplemented as necessary by planting shall be used as a buffer to surface water bodies and adjacent to developed residential areas of lower densities. (6) a. Water The site plan shall include information demonstrating that the domestic and fire flow water needs for the proposed area of development have been met. This information shall demonstrate the aquifer sources utilized by adjacent areas will not be adversely affected by the supplying of water to the proposed development and that the supply can be maintained over a sustained period of time. A 24-hour rated pump test shall be required° b. Sewerage The site plan shall include a plan for sewerage. This plan shall conform to the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan in the designation of proposed trunk and lateral improvement districts. In addition, development shall not proceed until sewerage facilities are available, except for those parcels and structures for which the Commission has determined that public sewerage facilities are not required and on-site facilities have been approved by DHEP. c. Storm Water Drainage To the extent practicable, the site plan shall ensure that storm water is retained on-site. Storm water drainage/water quality management plans are subject to the review of the Department of Public Works. The site plan shall conform to the following standards: An erosion and sedimentation plan for the site shall be subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The erosion and sedimentation control plan shall conform to the Anchorage Municipal Code and to the following standards: 7B A~TACHMENT A · ~ ' _$~c~e Desiun Standards "The developer shall submit detailed roadway circulation, storm drainage, water and sewerage plans consistent with the requirements of these limitations. The Planning Commission shall approve these plans consistent with the requirements of these special limitations and such other conditions as the Commission may impose to meet the intent of these standards. Municipal departments, shall review final roadway circulation, storm drainage and water sewerage plans, engineering design, operational - maintenance costs consistent with the requirements imposed by the Commission and consistent with adopted standards and criteria of the Municipality. The results of the review shall be available to the Commission when it reviews the master plan." Public facilities shall be designed and constructed to have minimal impacts on adjacent residential areas. Where good engineering practice dictates that the data required by this section be compiled or reviewed Dy a civil engineer, such data shall be submitted only with certification from a Registered Alaskan CivilEngineer. All utility locations, installations, material, and sizing shall be approved by the utility with jurisdiction prior to Master Site Plan approval. Each utility shall submit a s~m~ary of their review, including a cost analysis, to the Planning Commission. Public facilities shall provide essential public services in a safe, convenient and economical way, in accordance with the following standards: 7^ space may be used as a buffer between rural residential areas and high density urban development, and when so used shall follow the policies of the Hillside Wast,water Management Plan. Dedicated usable open space m~y include publicly dedicated park land when it is within the same zoning boundary and Master Plan. The open space shall be designated on the site plan as undisturbed open space or landscaped open space. Both undisturbed and landscaped open space shall be noted as common open space or private open space. As provided by the approved site plan, all common open space shall be dedicated to the public or conveyed to the surrounding or adjacent home owners association. Usable open space may include publicly dedicated parkland when it is within the same zoning boundary and master plan. Private open space which is undisturbed may be required to be contained in a scenic easement. Undisturbed open space shall coincide with critical environmental features. The Planning and Zoning Commission may require additional open space if they find it necessary to provide adequate buffers between the conflicting residentJ, al areas. Where a Master Plan encompasses less than all the land in the R-3 SL district established in Section 1, the Commission may permit a number of dwelling units consistent with: an equitable allocation of that number of ~its to various areas within that description in light of the intent of these special limitations. ii. the number of dwelling units permitted within the legal description, computed by multiplying the permitted number of units per acre by the n~ber of acres in that legal description. 7D Measures shall be implemented to attenuate flows, remove oil, grease and other petroleum products and filter suspended sediment from the project's storm water drainage structures prior to discharge into any natural body of water or into a municipal drainage structure which in turn discharges untreated storm water into a natural body of water. Discharge to surface bodies of water shall be according to currently accepted management practices. d. Circulation The site plan shall include a circulation plan identifying the ~esidential and collector streets of the proposed project. Interior residential streets may be realigned during Final Site Plan Review (provided that the realignment does not constitute an evasion of the intent of the master plan in the opinion of the reviewing authority). The circulation review shall conform to the following standard: With the exception of essential through connections, circulation for the proposed development shall be within the boundaries of that development. The Department of Public Works shall review and submit its findings on the circulation plan to the Planning Conm~ssion. A minimum of fifty percent of the site shall be retained as usable open space. Usable open space means open space within a proposed development site excluding areas devoted to roadways, parking, decks, balconies, buildings, and artificial surfaces. This open 7C R-3 SL TP, I0 TH It TR 12 i.. TR 7~ I · TR ' TR 8B /? TR I~ (12) ~NIN~ R-$ SL ' A.O. 84-21 2O R-6 .to_ RrlA~ The R-lA SL properties shall be subject to the following special limitation design standards: No site plan shall be approved unless it conforms to the following policies in addition to the applicable provisions of Title 21: The site plan shall conform to the Comprehensive Plan in themanner provided byAnchorage Municipal Code Chapter 21.05, and conform to the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan, including the transition area standards of Technical Report $3 of the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan. The site design shall reflect hydrology, wind conditions, soil and bedrock conditions and other environmental factors. ResidgDD~_3Densit~ The total number of dwelling units permitted shall be 3 dwelling units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan is designed to improve the physical, socialf and economic environment of the community. The Comprehensive Plan serves as a source of information to the general public, as well as to government agencies having an impact upon physical development decisions. The Comprehensive Plan serves as a means of coordination between the private and public sectors, between different government agencies~ and between the legislative body and its technical staff. The Comprehensive Plan serves as the best estimate of the future - an estimate that is guided by specific community goals. The plan reflects what is most likely to happen if the ~olicies and programs in the plan are followed. The Comprehensive Plan serves as a declaration of public policy regarding physical development and clearly states the objectives and actions that the community intends to pursue to achieve the recommendations contained in the Plan. The Comprehensive Plan focuses attention upon the ma~or issues confronting the community, and aids in resolving these through a discussion of the consequences of alternative courses of action. The Comprehensive Plan and its attending planning process are intended to be instrumental in both guiding and influencing urban development. It is a method which helps to ensure that community resources will be used in the most efficient manner practicable to reaching community goals. In addition,it can serve as a vehicle for representing, to the public and private sectors, the likely future of the community and the means to be used to achieve that future. (14) CONFORMITY TO THE CCMPREHENSIVE PLAN ~ _rposes and S~D~ o~the Com~_rehensive Plan The 1981 Comprehensive Development Plan is intended to serve as a practical guide for con. unity development. It is formulated around a series of key "functional" areas of urban planning concerned with the major public facilities and services designed to support urban development. These services also guide the location of urban development and apportion the density of that growth. Included in these descriptions are goals, objectives, and policies which support the development of these facilities and provide direction to the manner in which they are to organized. Initially, these goals and objectives were a synthesis of the public participation process used in developing the 1976 Comprehensive Plan, but have since been augmented to inlcude responses to new conditions and events which have taken place during the past five years. The Plan also includes implementation guidelines to be applied in conjunction with the land use maps. The latter allocate basic uses as appropriate to the needs of the con. unity. Methods to direct this process over time are also identified.. They provide the dimension of time to the maps of land uses. The Plan is necessarily general, to be further defined by appropriately detailed plans, by ordinances and other policy tools applied by the Assembly and Planning and Zoning Commission. The adopted Comprehensive Plan is a public declaration of the general policies which will guide but not bind, the actions of the legislative body. This declaration of policy is a reflection of community gbals as expressed by the conmunity and approved by their elected representatives. Some of the benefits and purposes of the Comprehensive Plan and the planning process are outlined as follows: (13) suited for such development, where access may be provided without constituting a hazard of overloading residential streets, and where development can be designed to minimize conflicts with other uses. The development of major public facilities (water, sewer) should be encouraged prior to the urbanization of large tracts of vacant residential land. Land Management Process: Goals To develop the community in an orderly, sequential way to achieve a moderate in-filling of vacant urban lands served or about to be served by public facilities. Objectives Utility installation shall be coordinated to achieve savings and prevent conflicting utility placement, and to achieve the recommendations of the Comprehensive Development Plan. The utilization of existing facilities shall be optimized. To the extent practicable, the costs of improvement, extension, and construction of public facilities shall be distributed between the private and public sectors. The scheduling, design, and installation of public facilities shall be undertaken to achieve desired land use patterns and densities. (16) Relationshi~o r. xDSp. rgb~rggj~ Plan Go~ Poli_c_i_e~y_e~ Land Patterns: Goals To develop an enforceable land use plan for the social and economic needs of the communityf consistent with the natural characteristics of the area. To develop and maintain residential co~nunities that provide a safe and healthful environment and are protected from incompatible land uses and land activities. Objectives Adopt and implement policies and programs that reduce land use conflicts and nonconformities. Protect established residentially zoned neighborhoods from the intrusion of incompatible facilities and land uses and their effects (noise, glare, dust). Develop flexible and cluster use zoning ordinances that afford incentives, such as density bonuses, to developers that provide a~nenities and specialized housing needs. Policies o Future land development should incorporate and protect natural land forms, vegetation, and scenic vistas. Higher residential densities should be permitted and encouraged in areas where amenities can be provided, where the land is (15) the R-lA SL zonings will limit densities to the 3 dwelling units as suggested in the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan. All properties developed under this ordinance will be served by public sewer in order to achieve the densities specified. Quote from the Comprehensive Plan - Pg. 63 "To further define the land classification systems, density ceilings are established for each residential classification. These ceilings serve to define the general level of desired development ..... These de~mities are meant to express gross density levels; as such, they provide a general indication of total number of dwelling units in a contiguous geographic area for the purposes of facility planning and as an indication of the overall distribution of population and of desired housing type(s)." Facility Phasing: The petitioners intend to extend the public sewer and cor~munity water to serve the properties at their expense. The extension is consistent with the facility phasing map and the municipal capital improvement program (the facility will be available to the subject properties prior to the time of development activity -Rabbit Creek Trunk and Potter Creek Water Company). (18) Develop an Urban Development Plan to specify areas and densities of development, and the requisite services for such growth, over a 1-6 year planning period. Develop and implement the master plan review and land-banking concept s. Policies The priorities for the scheduling, design, and installation of public utilities shall be in accordance with the Comprehensive Development Plan, the Urban Development Plan, and the Municipal Land Management System. Municipal utility system shall be only extended to those areas where it is economical to provide both sewer and water and where residential densities (including and greater than 3 units per acre) can be reasonably anticipated and accor~odated within an entire planning community. Utility system shall not be extended to areas designated for rural, low density development in the Residential Intensity Map, except to resolve public health needs. The intent is to develop the properties to a density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Hillside Wastewater Management Plan, the G-5 rezoning and A.O. ~84-21 ( as amended). The areas to be rezoned from R-6 to R-3 SL will be developed at a density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre and those rezoned from R-6 to R-lA will be at densities of 3 dwelling units per acre. The R-3 SL zonings are consistent with previous municipal rezonings (AO $84-21) for Tracts 10 and 11 of the Villages and will be subject to the same Special Limitations as those specified in said ordinance. (17) EFFECT ON: SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, THE GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE CC~MUNITY The Comprehensive Plan of Anchorage generally recognizes the limited amount of land available for residential development. In recognization of this limited supply the municipality has expended considerable public funds for Capital Projects to open the southern Hillside area for development. The proposed rezonings will be consistent with recent trends (G-5 rezoning and AO 84-21). Additional residential units will be allowed in a manner which will complement public expenditures for infrastructure and provide needed residential housing mix. The proposed rezonings coupled with the special limitations will assure compatibility with the environment and be consistent with allowed uses in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposal will allow flexible development and cluster development techniques in plann.{ng the sites. The design standards and precautionary measures specified will prevent urban sprawl in the general neighborhood, thus fulfilling specific concerns addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. The densities and designs anticipated by this proposal are consistent with overall community goals and objectives and specifically conform to objectives for the Hillside Area as reflected in the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan. EnvirO~ It is generally recognized by the Municipality that there are environmentally sensitive issues that must be addressed in designing development proposals in this area of the community. Fragile vegetation, sensitive soils, high water tables, occassional rock outcroppings and steep topography are all issues to be addressed. The special limitations proposed by this zoning will assure that environmental issues will be addressed prior to development. (20) Land Use Classification Map The subject area is designated for Residential Land Use on the Land Use Classification Map end is consistent with the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan. The uses proposed are consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (19) or transition from the R-3 SL to the R-lA property. Greece Drive, or an alternate easterly access, will be built to municipal standads. We estimate that 63 dwelling units will use this road, or 517 trips per day, or 46 VPH during peak hours. Tracts 12, 13A and 13B, the Villages, and Lot 3, Pineridge, will continue to use Hill Road. It is anticipated that Tract 12, the Villages, will bedevelopedinconjunctionwithTracts 10and 11~ which are currently zoned R-3 SL. Hill Road will be upgraded at that time to accommodate the development with Hill Road extending to Potter Valley Road, not Villages Scenic Parkway, as it presently does. The remainder of the rezoned property will continue to gain access through Villages Scenic Parkway. We estimate the maximum number of units that this R-1Aproperty can accommodate is 46, or an increase of 9 units, if it were to be developed under the R-6 zoning. The traffic impact to Villages Scenic Parkway will be insignificant. The municipality has invested (and has scheduled) substantial sums to provide public services and facilities to allow the type of development anticipated by this proposal. The Rabbit Creek Trunk sewer and major transportation improvements reflect the type of facilities and services that anticipate the development proposed by this rezoning. Potter Valley Road has been designated as a collector street and has recently been built and will adequately accommodate the additional traffic generated by this zoning. It is also recognized that internal circulation must be handled in a manner conducive to safety and welfare. In recognition of this need, the overall transportation access is being realigned and access will be controlled and limited along Villages Scenic Parkway. The possible elimination of Greece Drive and relocation of access to abutting properties is part of the recognized need to provide a safe and decent transportation system. (22) ~ffi~_ImpDct The Villages Subdivision gains access through Potter Valley Road. The majority of the subdivision uses the Villages Scenic Parkway to get to Potter Valley Road, and a small portion use Hill Road. The Villages Scenic Parkway is a rural, 24-foot wide, gravel road built to municipal standards. Hill Road is a substandard gravel road that is in need of upgrading. Greece Road is located adjacent to Tracts 7A, 7B and 8C; a portion of the dedicated right-of-way exists but no physical road exists at this time. If the area within the rezoning request was developed under its existing R-6 zoning, we estimate this land could accommodate a maximum of 41 single-family residences which would generate 320 trips per day. If the area is developed.in its R-6 configuration, Greece Drive would not be constructed. 37 of the residences would use Villages Scenic Parkway and 4 residences would use Hill Road. Approval of the rezoning request would increase the number of residences from 41 to 125, we estimate. This would increase traffic on Potter Road by 686 trips per day, or by 62 VPH during the peak hours. Potter Valley Road is a minor arterial with a capacity of 1,800 VPH. The increase in traffic will be insignificant. Rezoning would also change the development strategy for this property. The developer would construct an access road to the Potter Valley Road. This wouldmake this the primary access for Tracts 7A, 7B, and 8C, which will be zoned R-3 SL. Constructing this road would serve two purposes. First, it would relieve the pressure off Villages Scenic Parkway. Villages Scenic Parkway would become a peripheral road to the R-3 SL property; used only as an access road to the R-lA and R-6 lend to the south. Secondly, because this R-3 SL property would not be using Villages Scenic Parkway for access, it will help to provide a separation (21) Su~.d Demand. and Timinq_ of_ DgYDlopm~nt While no specific supply and demand analysis has been performed for this proposal, the following provides general insight into the subject: Those tracts lying East of Villages Scenic Parkway and North of Greece Drive and proposed as R-3 SL are scheduled for development during 1986o Some of the properties proposed as R-IA SL are currently being developed and the owners have expressed a desire to have public sewer available to their properties, thus making development consistent with the densities of the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan possible. Finally, resubdivision of the original Villages Subdivision has recognized the need and market for the highly desireable scenic and aesthetic tracts within this area. The sale of resubdivided parcels is evidence of the demand for residential sites in this highly preferred section of the community. (24) The Hillside Wastewater Management.Plan identified the fact that lands within the proposed rezoning were generally unsuitable for on-site treatment systems. Specific soils tests on portions of the properties verifies that steep slopes, near surface rock formations, low permeable soils types and high water tables make on-site treatment systen~ an extremely costly proposition. (See Soils Report) The municipality has provided public sewer inm~diataly adjacent (and con~mnity water supply is also available) to the existing proposal. The existing trunk sewer has capacity to accommodate the density of development anticipated by this zoning. Preliminary cost estimates indicate that the most cost-effective way of providing sewer to this area is through connection to the available public sewer. In addition to the cost-effective consideration, it is recognized that public health concerns can best be addressed if the area is served by public sewer. Paradise Valley, an adjacent subdivision, has experienced failures in on-site systems which have threatened water supplies and generally presented health hazards to area residents. T~ese factors, as well as the willingness of the property owners to extend the sewer at their expense, are measures which should contribute to the favorable consideration of the proposed rezoning. Community water shall be extended from an existing well and water distribution system located within South Creek Subdivision. This permitted well shall provide residential and fire flows as described in the Master Plan for South Creek Subdivision. Although the well and water distribution system are privately owned and maintained, ~ASg3 standards and review are incorporated with its design, construction and maintenance. Additional individual wells within the petition area should not be necessary. No affect on senior water rights shall result from this rezoning. (23) HILLSIDE 1 1 1 1 ! 11 February 1982 Prepared by ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERS and PHYSICAL PLANNING DIVISION ANCHORAGE MUNICIPAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ATTACHMENT TO VILLAGES REZONING 5.3°2 Trunk Improvement Districts shall be established for areas 1-4 as noted on the Plan Maps° Boundaries for the districts shall not extend beyond the areas indicated for sewerage on the maps. The Anchorage Sewer Service Area 201 Facility plan study shall evaluate interceptor system (and possibly waste treatment) needs for sewering of areas 1-4 in accordance with the recommended densities. A sewerage facilities phasing plan shall be developed for sewerage of areas 1-4. The phasing, design, and construction of addi- tional sewerage facilities by the Municipality of Anchorage shall be reflected in the Urban Development Plan, Capital Improvement Program, and Capital Improvement Budget. And specifi- cally, adoption of land use recommendations in areas 3 and 4 will necessitate the Lmmediate scheduling, planning, and installation of transmission facilities to the area south of Rabbit Creek. Other Facilities Plannin~ Recommendations. Additional public facilities will be needed in order to accommodate the additional development that sewerage will allow in areas 1-4o Prepare a Hillside krea Transportation Plan with timed phasing of improvements coordinated with other facility phasing. Phasing of design and construction of transportation improvements shall be reflected in the AMATS Long Range Element and Transportation Improvement Program, Urban Development Plan, Capital Improvement Program, and Capital Improvement Budget. Prepare storm drainage plan for areas 1-4 with timed phasing of improvements coordinated with other facility phasing. Phasing of design and construction of storm drainage ~provements shall be reflected in the Urban Development Plan, Capital Improvement Program and Capital Improvement Budget. 26 Certain areas that are only mar$inally suitable for on-site treatment systems are also denoted. These are primarily partially developed areas characterized by on-site wastewater treatment problems. Some of the more "innovative" on-site systems may be useful in solving the current problems in these areas, and may allow for further development. Moreover, these innovative systems as .well as the conventional deep trench system may be used in those areas identified as generally unsuitable where it can be demonstrated that par- ticular site conditions allow for such on-site wastewater treatment. The remaining area of the Hillside is proposed to be developed with low density, large-lot housing by utilizing individual on-site wastewater dis~- sal systems. Following are recommendations for the various wastewater disposal systems that are identified for use in the Hillside area. The recommendations along with the plan maps constitute an action plan that is intended to act as a guide for decisions regarding.future development of the Hillside area. 5.3 Recommendations for Sewerage Areas The following recommendations are specifically intended to deal with development in those'geographic areas iden- tified on the recommended maps for sewerage. A number of the recommendations address land use issues not directly related to wastewater disposal practices. It should be understood that implementation actions leading to expan- sion of the sewerage system in the Hillside area must be linked with other facilities planning and land use poli- cies. Sewering of new areas will lead to higher den- sities, which in turn will create a need for additional public facilities and services. Establishment of new areas of higher densities could possibly have a negative impact on the more rural character of neighborhood low density subdivisions. Consequently, there is also a need to establish and implement certain land use policies that are designed specifically to maintain the integrity of the more rural areas. 5.3.1 Wastewater Disposal Recommendations. The areas identified for sewerage on the Hillside Wastewater Disposal Plan Maps are to be provided public sewerage sufficient to allow development at the densities indicated on the maps° 25 I I All areas currently zoned Unrestricted shall be rezoned. Their rezoning shall reflect, in part, the minimum density patterns established in the Hillside Wastewa%er Disposal P!ano Rezoning shall be evaluated as to appropriate- ness and need based upon the land use, sewerage, on-site and public facility criteria identified in the the Hillside Wastewater Management Plano Area 3 on the Hillside Wastewater Disposal Plan Map shall be designated as a Controlled Development Area° The establishment cf the Con%rolled Development krea is intended to preserve the use of that area for higher den- sity development until such time as facilities and services are available. During the interim (approximately two to three years), subdivision plats must be designed, and s%ruc- tures~located on lots, so as to allow for additional development when sewerage becomes available~ ° Neighborhood or sub-area plans shall be pre- pared which will integrate all the activities mentioned above. The neighborhood plans will reflect in greater detail the '~ spec~,_c land use patterns and design criteria which will be applied to decisions regarding !and development. 5°3.3 Prepare a water resource, transmission, and distribution analysis for areas 1-4. Phasing of design and construction of any Municipal water system improvements shall be coordinated with other facility phasing, and shall be reflected in the Urban Development Plan, Capital Improvement Program, and Capital Improvement Budget. Prepare park and school facility needs assessment in accordance with expected popula- tion growth resulting from expansion of sewerage and other public facilities. The need for improved police and fire protection should also be carefully evaluated as the area continues to develop. Land Use Recommendations. The Hillside Wastewater Disposal PLan shall be adopted as a functional element to the Anchorage Comprehensive Development Plan. The minimum density patterns established on the Hillside Wastewater Disposal Maps shall be reflected on the Anchorage Comprehensive Development Plan Map. The land use objectives and policies, and land management recommen~ .dations included in the Anchorage Comprehensive Development Plan shall be applied to the Hillside Area. In particular Site design criteria which adequately addresses flexible lot design, landscaping, transitional boundaries, and internal cir- culation standards; Plat review process which adequately eval- uates the effects of proposed projects upon adjacent lands, and requires proper mitiga- tion measures for secondary impacts. This review shall include, but not be limited to, internal and off-site circulation, drainage, public facility, and land use impacts; and Public facility planning principles designed to Locate and size major water sewer and road project according to adopted land use plans. 27 HILLS[DE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY MAP 9: RECOMMENDED SEWERAGE AND ON-SITE SYSTEM AREAS SHEET2OF2 SHEETS: SOUTH OF DEARMOUN ROAD ~ PubhcSewerage EXlSlJng 'C)EFINITIONS NORTH SCALE ONE MIL. E P.O. BOX 66150 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99502-0650 (907) 264-4111 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES January 10, 1986 TO: Permit Applicant Subject: Permit # 850460 Tract 8B.The Villages Subdivision A permit issued by this Department for an individual well aud/or on-site sewer system has expired as of December 31, 1985. Permits are issued on a calendar year basis by authority of Municipal Ordinance. A new permit must be obtained from this Department for any well and/or on-site sewer system not installed by the expiration date. If you have drilled the well, a well log needs to be sent to this Department for documentation of the installation and to close the permit. If a private engineer inspected the installation of the on-site sewer system the original as-built inspection report(three part form) must be sent to this office for review and approval,and for documentation. If there are any further questions, please call this office at 264-4720. Sincerely, Susan E. Oswalt Program Manager On-site Services SEO/ljw eno: Copy of Permit DEF'ARTMENT OF HEAL]H AND ENVIRGIqMEIql-AL F'ROTEEiTION 8~.=~ L :~1 REEl .~ ANOHOR(-/SE,, At':: 9~5c) 1 64 4 7~,~..~ 0 I'ql -- E~ I -I- E ~ I'E ~J E R 8-. I~1E L 1_ F' E I"~: I"1 I 3- ~ERMIT NO: 850460 )ATE IGSUED: G7/30/85 ~PPLICANT: JAMEL'3 E. TALLEY ~DDRESS: 4105 BRANTLEY PLACE ANDHORAGE, AK 99508 ]ONTAOT PHONE: 561-1874 _EGAL DESCRIP: SUBDIVISIGN: THE VILLAGES SECT I OIq: 14 TOWNSFtI P: ..OT SIZE~ 2.22A (SQ.FT. OR ACRES) dAX BEDROOMS~ 5 LO]': T. 8B BLOCK: N/A 1 1N RANbE:· .=,W _isted below are the options available Lo you in desig(ling your septic ~ystem. Choose the opti.er~ that be~.~t fits yottr site. 'T- I:~ F=' I"~ [],'. I-t E~ I~ IJ} I^!., I~ ~ K-b DEPTH 'T'O F'IPE BOTTGM (FT.) 10.0 6.5 4.0 GRAVEL DEPTH (FT.) 6.0 0.5 :3,0 TOTAL DEF'TH (FI.) 16.0 7.0 7,0 GRAVEL W]:DTH (FT.) 2.5 18.0' 5.0 GRAVEL LENGTH (FT.) 63.0 36.0 68..0 GRAVEL VOLUME (CU.YDS.) 38.0 24.() 44. 1 TANK-SIZE (GALS) 1~500.0 ~* 1,500.0 ** 1,500,0 SOIL RATING (SD.FT./BR) 150 85 115 TANK MUST 14AVE AT LEAST TWO COMPARTMENTS I certify that: 1. I am Familiar with the requirements For on-site sewers and wells as set Forth by tl~e Municipality oF Anchorage (MOA) and the State oF Alaska. 2. I will install tbs system in accordance with all MOA codes and regLlations~ and in compliance with the design criteria oF this permit. 5. ~ will adhere to all MOA and State oF 'Alaska requirements for the set. back " distances From any e,,isting well, wastswater disposal system or public sewer'age system on this or any adjacent or nearby lot. 4, I understand that 'Lhis permit is valid For a maximum oF 5 bedrooms and any enlargement will require an additional permit. IF A LIFT STATION IS INSTALl_ED IN AN AREA COVERED BY MOA BUILDING CODES, 'THEN (1) AN' ELF~CTRICAL PERMIT AND INSPECTION MUST BE OBTAINED; (2) AS-BUILTS , WILL N(]T BE APPROVED WITHOUT AN ELECTRICAL INSPECTION REPORT; ANB (3) THE ELECTRICAL WORK MLIGT BE DONE BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN. AF'PL I U~~E. TALLE~ .... ,AMES B. ROBERTS PE, RLS ~' ENGIINEER IA SURVEYOR 360 W. BENSON BLVD. SUITE 207' ANCltORAGE,AK. 99503 (907'} 563-1863 L] SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION 'TEST SOl L.S LOG PERCOLATION S hO'P E SITE PLAN ' 10 11 12 13 14 15- 16.- 17- 18- 1g- 20- WAS OROU~O~"ATE" /1/'o [ ENCOUNTERED? O P E IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? Gross Nat Depth to Not Reading Oat'e Time ,Time Water Drop .... ~", ~;% ' ....... ..,, , PERCOLATION "ATE (minut.s/inc',) TEST RUN BE~EEN FT AND ALASKA ENVIROI~'viENTAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. 1.2oo west 33rd Ave.hue Suite B ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 Phone 561:,~040 GHEET NO. CALCULATED BY--''~ ~'~/~)"'~ DATI=-- DATE CIIECKEO BY. SCALE_ . i zv S Pg5~ %'/<2 t / TI/AN Z" z~i(~?O /~54,'Zt?T-/d/v' =lc PERFORMED FOR: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7' 8 10 12 14 17 MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE U DEPARTMENT OF HEALTII AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION''~'~ Lj 825 L, Street, Anchorago, Alaska 99501 264-4720 SOILS LOG ' PERCOLATION TEST SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST SLOPE DATE PER FORM E D: ,_~l~~--'~'~"'=''"-~'~ ~''~'~[ S~TE PLAN L~'T- /,,'z,~:--.._~? ENCOUNTERED? IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? Reading Date Time Time Water Drop PERCOLATION RATE ~:OMMENTS TEST RUN BETWEEN CERTIFIED BY: FT AND -- FT 72-008 (6/79) · .' ~'~'~i~ MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION 825 L Street - Anchorage. Alaska 99501 Telepl~one 264-4720 ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM AND/OR WELL INSPECTION REPORT ~OCATION NO, OF BEDROOMS p ~ Manufacturer , Material No. ol compar[ments ~ P Liq. capacity in gallons Inside lenglE Widd~ Liquid deptb /Z ~O IF HOMEMADE', ~ .o. o[ ,,,~es Ler,gt~ o, .ach ,iB~__..) Vo,a' 'e,,gti)~e) Trench wid E ~ Distance betwoen lines ~ Topof dleto finish grad~ ~ / ~ Material~beneath~l ~tile ~ ~ ~¢~¢ inches Total effective Length Width . . D0pth PERMIT NO. ~ p Typo of crib Crib diameter Crib depU] Total eNective absorption area ~ Well Building foundation Near0st lot line ~ DISTANCE 'to: TO: Building Iour,~ ~tion. Sewer line ~ Septic tank /~/I Abso.ption area(s) APPROVED DATE LEGAL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH& ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION 825 LStreet-Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Telephone 264-4720 ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAl. SYSTEM AND/~R WELL INSPECTION REPORT ~AIL_ING'A DRESS DESCRIPTION DISTANCE TO: ~ No. o[ lines ~ .~-~ Length~tol each~i ~ .} ~']iq6~/.~()/Z- ~ Trench ........ widthF/ inches Oistanc0 between lines - ~ ~ '~op of [11~-~o Enish 9rad~ ~ .. ~' ' ~/ Material ben~ti~ [ile ~ , ~ Total elfective absorption arqa Length / Width ~epth .~- PERMIT NO. ~ p Type of crib,-"' Crib diameler / Crib depth ~/.- Class Oeplh Driller Db,ance to lo, line PERMIT NO. ~, /~)/~ ~ Building foundation Sewer line Septic tank Absoq)don area(s) /:},,..~ OTHER PIPE j 5.3.2 Trunk Improvement Districts shall be established for areas 1-4 as noted on the Plan Maps. Boundaries for the districte shall not extend beyond the areas indicated for sewerage on the maps. The Anchorage Sewer Service Area 201 Facility plan study shall evaluate interceptor system (and possibly waste treatment) needs for sewering of areas 1--4 in accordance with the recommended densities'. ' ° A sewerage facilities phasing plan shall be developed for sewerage of areas 1-4. The phasing, design, and construction of addi- tional sewerage facilities by the Municipality of Anchorage shall be reflected in the Urban Development Plan, Capital Improvement Program, and Capital Improvement Budget. And specifi- (:ally, adoption of land use recommendations in areas 3 and 4 will necessitate the immediate scheduling, planning, and installation of transmission facilities to the area south of Rabbit Creek. Other Facilities Planning Recommendations. ~dditional public facilities will be needed in order to accommodate the additional development that sewerage will allow in areas 1-4. Prepar~ a Hillside Area Transportation Plan with timed phasing of improvements coordinated with other facility phasing. Phasing of design and construction of transportation improvements shall be reflected in the AMATS Long Range Element and Transportation Improvement Prograza, Urban Development Plan, Capital Improvement Program, and Capital Improvement Budget. Prepare storm drainage plan for areas 1-4 with timed phasing of improvements coordinated with other facility phasing. Phasing of design and construction of storm drainage improvements shall be reflected in the Urban Development. Plan, Capital Improvement Program and Capital Improvement Budget. 26 043'. HILLSIDE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN February 1982 Prepared by ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERS and PHYSICAL PLANNING DIVISION ANCHORAGE MUNICIPAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT 041 CONSTRUCTION 'TEST I~%B ' ~ T.~{. 86-i "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland .Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Perfo~ned for L H KM ba%e Performed 4/19/79~,., Legal Description: This Form reports: 1st Test Hole Depth soil'Characteri~i~.il 3!! Feet ~ot 1 . ,.:Bloc~,Tra~%07B Subdivision The Vil]aoe~ ~-0ILS TEST.. y~s''~<i ~: ' PERCO~%TION TEST 3 ' Peat Gray Silty Sand (wet) 10' Bottom of Test Hole Was Ground Water Encountered yes If YES, What depth? 6' -,, Reading Date Gross Time ~Net TLme Depth to H20 Net Drainage Percolation Rate Minute Proposed--InStallation: SEEPAGE PIT DRAIN FIELD Depth of 2tnlet Depth' to ~ottom of Pit or Trench __CO~4ENTS:'-W~t~r table to hiqh for on-site septic system.' ...... Test Performed by David Paul Data Certified By:~onstruction Test Lab-2 Date. ':~4/25/79 ,! Ail areas currently zoned Unrestricted shall be rezoned. Their rezoning shall reflect, in part, the minimum density patterns established in the Hillside Wastewater Disposal Plan. Rezoning shall be evaluated as to appropriate- ness and need based upon the land use, sewerage, on-site and public facility criteria identified in the the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan. Area 3 on the Hillside Wastewater Disposal Plan Map shall be designated as a Controlled Development Area. The establishment of the Controlled Development Area is intended to preserve the use of that area for higher den- sity development until such time as facilities and services are available. During the interim (approximately two to three years), subdivision plats must be designed, and struc- tures located on lots, so as to allow for additional development when sewerage becomes available. ° Neighborhood or sub-area plan-s shall be pre- pared which will integrate all the activities mentioned above. The neighborhood plans will reflect in greater detail the specific land use patterns and design criteria which will be applied to decisions regarding land deve!opmen%. 045 CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions~ 2204 Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Performed for L ~ K M Legal Description: Lot 4 This Fo~m report:s: SOILS TEST _~BlockTract 7B yes ~ ~ 4/19/79 Date _er.~ormed Subdivision The Villages PERCOLATION TEST y~ Depth soil Characteristics Feet 2.5' Peat Brown silt with occasional gravel wet Bottom of test hole Was Ground Water Encountered If YES, What depth? Reading Date Gross Time .~Net TLme Depth to H20 Net Drainage 4/i9i/~ 24 hrs. " Saturation P(~r. 16" 4/20/79 17" 1" Percolation Rate Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D_~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to ~ottom of Pit or Trench CO~4ENTS: .... U~suitable for absorption system Test Performed by David Paul Data Certified By: ~n~e~ction Test La5 ... Date ': .... 4/25/7~ ' [ [ T.H. 86-3 CONSTRUCTION TEST ~%B "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland knchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Performed for Legal Description: This Fo~ reports: 4I Depth Feet L H KM Lot 2 .::BlockTract 7B SOILS TEST yes Soil'Characteristics Date Performed 4/19/79 Subdivision The Villages PERCOL%TION TEST Peat wet Gray silt- wet- Bottom of test hole Was Ground Water Encountered yes If YES, What depth? 4' Reading Date Gross T~e ~Net T~e Depth to H20 Net Drainage Percolation Rate Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D_~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth 'to Bottom of Pit or Trench _CO~4ENTS:'-- gn~.itable for absorption system. A second test hole was drilled --on this lot and the same soils condition exist. Test Performed by David Paul · Data Certified By: Construction Test Lab .2 Date ':'''4/25/79 Hewilt V. Lounsb'ury ~ ,~ssoc/otes' S.~.*et I of Engl'neers -- Surveyors Total D.opth ~.' ?~ '~ ~ Anchoroge, Aloska ~ Gro;und Water Toble Geologist ~"~ ~'-~ I Tzme J D~,te DESCRIPTION £oco;~Dn.Notes £ Diagram: ; S°mpling Soil type~ coloG lexture~ ~ estimated particle size, T.II. 06-7 ', ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , sampler driving ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ depthscirculalion lost, . o 9 I0 II 14 - - - 053 'r 18 ~ I9 SIEVE ' AI.,!E\I~ S 1 S I' .I. /6'0 -k S 'J-7v ~ M D. I I I I I ~ESCP, I~TIOH · ~.~'~' T.H. 86-12 ~ ~ eMim~led purl:cie ~'~'e~ ~ ~ -'~ ~J ~ ~ ' ~ sompler dtivin~ notes, J L.o ~ I .., I -~ - 5 / Z--Fo~ - __- ~ I0 '~ '~, H --- " " 'lC L _ ~1 ," t .L~- :~t,~-' ._ -- _ LI ...l._.J== -- CONSTRUCTION TEST "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland .Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 T.H. 86-16 Perfo~ned for Steve Havedorn Legal Description: ~pt 8 -~:Block Tract This Fo~n reports: SOILS TEST yes 14 Date Perfo~ed4/23/79 Subdivision_ The Villages PERCOLATION TEST yes Depth Feet _ 6.'% Peat soil Characte.ristics Brown silty grave~i~race of sand Brown silty gravelly sand Bottom of test hole Bedrock ~.~as Ground Water Encountered! if YES, l'~nat depth? no Reading Date '" Gross T/~e ...;Net TL~e Depth to H20 Net Drainage 9:25 ~.4 Sat. Pr. 34" 4/23/79 __ 4/24/79 No water ,, ,, 0 20" " " 3 . 0 I ' """ .... '- ' ~. s ?n" ~o" 07 % f " " 4.(l 73.5" q 5" Percolation Rate 1"/9 Minute Average Proposed :Installation: SEEPAGE PIT DRAIN FIELD Depth of .Inlet .. Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench CO~4ENTS:---.~e~ock encountered at.10' .... 16~-square feet drainaq~-area required per bedroom. Test Performed by David Paul Data Certified By: Construction Test-La~ A second test-hole was drilled.next, tO~ ' ' Date ': .... ~'./9~./7Q . first hole to~ Confirm' bedrock:,-- .. .- · ~-'-! CONSTRUCTION TEST "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 T.H. 86-14 Performed for Steve Havedorn Legal Description: Lot ~ This Fo~n r~ports: SOILS TEST yes Date .Performed 4/19/79 Subdivision Th~ PERCOT.'~TION TEST Depth Soil'Characteristics Feet Peat 2' Brown silt - damp Brown Sandy gravel with trace of silt 11' Brown gravelly sand Bottom of test hole Bedrock { Was Ground Water Encountered no If YES, P~at depth? Reading Date Gross TJ~me ~Net T~.~e Depth to H20 Net Drainage Percolation Rate Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT DRAIN~IELD Depth of Inlet Depth to Botto~ of Pit or Trench CObU4ENTS:-.~edr~c~.encountered at 14'.. _150-~quare feet- draina~e-are~ ............. required per bedroom.'- Test Performed bY David Paul Data Certified By: Con$~ructi6n A second test hole was drilled n~xt, to'"-. .... Date '-' '.''' ' 4/25/79 [:~/so~Ls LO~ T.H. 86-2D MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 825 L Street., AnChorage, Alaska 99501 264-4720 SOILS LOG- PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED FOR: LEGAL DEECR (PTION: IFEE :3 ~,'. $- 7~ ELOPE ENCOUNTERED? IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? PERCOLATION TEST DATE PERFORMED: SITE PLAN - I I I _ I I I gl-IIIII!ttlJ ~1 I I i I I IJ!,_-L_M II I1'1'' ~ I,,1 14 15 16, 17- 18 19 20 'iOMMENT$ 075 _ PERCOLATION RATE (minutes/inch} TEST RUN BETWEEN FT AND -- · FT PERFORME~ S¥: ~(,?~ r '7'" CERT,F,ED~= 86-18 GREATER ANCHORAGC AREA BOROUGH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRO~i,.~EHTAL QU4LITY Case 3330-"C" Street ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 Performed For ~_L~,r /~_~, /2~ Dated Performed Legal Description:' .'.L~_.~?~]c/c.k A.. Subdi'~sion \/;~t~-_, This Form Reports So~ls Log Z¢~ ~ ~_. ~ . . .Percolation - Soil Test Must Be Logged To 4' Below Proposed Seepage System 2~1 3~ 5-- 6~ 7-- '8. 9-- lO-- Depth ~ Feet ' Soil Characteristics .~m/:. w U' · ol-~%J~ c>~f_~i~E~ '.'as Ground Water Encountered?__~ J'~'~d' ~ ~ )-"~J~ ,1 ! ~ If Yes At ~lhat Depth~ Reading Date Gross Time Net Time Depth to H20 Net Drop ,' I I 073 "' ercolation Rate Min~...:~: Pit Drain Proposed Installation: ~eev=u~ ~ ..... -~.~_.~' Depth of Inlet ~Depth to Bottom oT Hit o~,~.'~.~-,~ .~ Test Performed BY~)o~!~.~'m~ 'Date Certified B~,. ". ..... ' "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland .Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 ~ormed for ~g~._ Description: lis Fo~n reports: Steve Chronn (CblSbi) SOILS TEST yes )epth Feet Soll' Char acterlstlc Peat Bro~,~ si.lt -wet- silty sand Bottom of Bedrock~ test hole ~as Ground ~ater Encountered no r~ YES, %M%at depth? T.H. 86-24 Date performed 4/21/79 The villages Subdivision pERCO~ATION TEST Read~mg Date Gross TL~e ;Net TL~e Depth to Net Drainage Percolation Rate ~inute D~A/N F~ELD Proposed In'~a!!ation: SEEP'AGE PIT o~'-~ Trench ~ Depth to Bottle Pit or ~ Depth of Inlet CI ~ENTS: ......... Be~--~-~'~un~ered at 4' ................. ~est perfo?med by David ~f'Lu~' Data Cer~-~ By: Date · .-: MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION E2E L, Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501' 264-4720 SLOPE ~ITE P~AN 1 2 3- 4- 5 6 7 8 9 ~ SOILS Ld~ T.H. 8~.2 [] PERCOLATION TEST 10 11 12 13 14 ~5- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- ,OMMENT$ ENCOUNTERED? IF YES, ATWHAT DEPTH? 077 PERCOLATION RATE TEST RUN SETWEEN CERTIFIED BY: FT ANO[ MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Environmental Health Division CASE REVIEW WORKSHEET CASE NUMBER: DATE RECEIVED: 86-012-2 May 11, 1987 SUBDIVISION OR PROJECT TITLE: A request to rezone COMMENTS DUE BY: May 18, 1987 approximately 60 acres from R-6 to R-7. ( ) PUBLIC WATER AVAILABLE ( ) PUBLIC SEWER AVAILABLE ( ) COMMUNITY WATER AVAILABLE COMMENTS: A request to rezone approximately 60 acres from R-6 to R-7. The DHHS objects to this rezone. According to the ......... ~--~ .... lot ~:~ for a single family dwelling in new plats is 40,000 sqtrare f~et. A~ iL is ~un~d R~u how, ~ ~L~3 way a two family dwelling could be constructed is to increase t~e ~ ~iz~ tu 10~O =quare~. .... ~ rezoned to R-7 a two family dwelling could be potentially constructed orr ~u,uuu ~qu~ ~c ...... would defeat DHHS's intentions for 40,000 square feet per~ily per l~t as th~ ................ double for the 40,000 square foot parcel. : , , ., . . -,. , ,'it// ) :'-'-r .  Municipality of Anchorage REC'D BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNI'I'Y PLANNING P.O. Box 6650 VSRIFY OWN: Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 Zoning Map Amendments require at a minimum 1.75 acres of land or a boundary common to the requested zoning district. The application must also be signed by 51% of the property owners in the area to be rezoned. A. Please fill in the information requested below. Print one letter or number per block. Do not write in the shaded blocks. 1. Case Number (IF KNOWN) 2. Petitioning for 4. Petitioner's Name (Last- First) Address '7,23 to City A IN~'J _State Phone No. ~ ' "~"/"~"! 3. Abbreviated legal descdpti°n (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOT 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOTS 34'45) full legal °n back page' 5. Petitioner's Representative Address City Phone No. State 6. Current Zoning 9. Traffic Analysis Zone 7, Petition Area Acreage 10. Hearing Date yYMMDD 11. Principal Tax Number Grid Number 12. No. Tax Parcels /{/~ ~ 14. Community Council 13. Fee $ B. ' I hereby certify that (I am) (I have been authorized to act for) the owner of the property described above and that I desire to rezone it in conformance with Chapter 21 of the Anchorage Municipal Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the basic rezoning fee is nonrefundable and is to cover the costs associated with processing this application, that it does not assure approval of the rezoning. I also understand that additional fees may be assessed if the MunicipaLity's costs to process this application exceed the basic fee. I further understand that assigned hearing dates are tentative and may have to be postponed by Planning Staff, Planning Commission, or the Assembly due to administrative reasons. Signature *Agents must provide written proof or authorization. RETURN COMMENTS TO: CASE NO. 86-012-2 XXXXXX A request to rezone approximately R-6 to R-7. MUNICIPAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT Zoning and Platting Division P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Ai~AU~9~i~ 343-4215 DEPT, OF HEALTH & ~NVIRONM~NTAL PROTECTION 60 acres f~ ~ '~ 1905 RECEIVED ...... A request to amend Title 21 to ................... . ...... A request for concept/final approval of a conditional use to permit a .................................. . in the ............... zone. ...... A request for an amendment to a conditional use ...... A site plan review for ........................... . COMMENTS: Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing Date: June 22, 1987 Comments Due:May 18, 1987 DISTRIBUTION: STANDARD DISTRIBUTION ...... (Public Projects) Urban Design Commission ...... (Ordinance Amendments) Municipal Attorney's Office XXXXXX Rabbit Creek Community Council ....................... Federation of Community Councils A.O. 84-21 TR I0 PLI R-3 SL A,O, 84- 2.1 TR 8 ,'012-2 PLI 15 2O R-lO A.O. 8, CASE: 86-012-2 PETITIONER: Clarence Herschbach REQUEST: Rezone to R-7 (Intermediate Rural Resi- dential District) TOTAL AREA: Approximately 60 acres LOCATION: N2, NE4, NE4, NE4, Section 15, TllN, R3W, S.M., Alaska; Tracts 7A, 7B, 8A, 8B, 8C, 9, 12, 13A, 13B, 13C, The Villages Subd.; Lots 1 - 9, The Villages-Pine Ridge Subd.; and Lots 1 - 3, Village Parkway Estates Add 1; generally located east and west of Villages Scenic Parkway near the intersec- tion with Greece Drive. CURRENT ZONE: R-6 (Suburban Residential - large lot) RABBIT CREEK COMMUNITY COUNCIL MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE MEMORANDUM DATE: June 17, 1987 TO: Mary Autor, Community Planning FROM: Stephen S. Morris, DHHS ~d SUBJECT: Zoning Case 86--012-2 We would like to ammend our recent comments on the zoning case referenced above. Much of the area included in the rezone is unsuitable or marginally adequate for onsite wastewater disposal. DHHS is opposed to any rezone if it would allow for an increase in the density of septic systems. Our original comments addressed a potential loophole that would allow a duplex to be constructed on a 40000 square foot lot thereby increasing the density of wastewater disposal systems in the area. DHHS is not opposed to the rezone if we can be assured that the area affected by this zoning action will be served by both public water and sewer. We require that a special limitation or condition be attached to this zoning action to insure that public sewer and water will be extended to serve this area prior to any further development. ~-T.!.l. $6-I CONSTRUCTION 'TEST LkB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Perfomned for L H KM Legal Description: Lot ] This Form reports: SOILS TEST yes 1st Test Hole Depth soil Characteristics Feet Peat Date Performed 4/19/79', Subdivision_The ~i]lages PERCOLATION TEST Gray Silty Sand (wet) Bottom of Test Hole ~Block Tract 7B Was Ground Water Encountered. yes If YES, %~at depth? 6' Reading Date Gross Ti=me Net TLme ! Depth to H20 Net Drainage ] Percolation Rate Minute Proposed-Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to Eottom of Pit or Trench . CO~4ENTS:-~Wa%~r table to~hiqh for on-yJt___e septic 7'est Performed by David Paul Data Certified By:_construction %est Lab Date : ~/25/79 2204 CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions'~ Cleveland .Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Performed for L Legal Description: This For~ reports: 2nd Cest Hole H K M Lot 1 .:BlockTract 7B SOILS TEST yes Date Performed 4/19/79 Subdivision The vJliages PERCOLATION TEST Depth Feet 2' Peat soil Characteristics Bworn sandy gravel -wet- Brown silty sandy gravel Bottom Test Hole ~Was Ground Water Encountered yes If YES, $~nat depth? 6.5' Reading Date I Gross TLme Net TLme Depth to H20 Net Drainage Percolation Rate Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench CO~4ENTS:- Watmr table to hiqh for on-site septic system. Test Performed by David Paul Data Certified By:~en~er,~c~-~mn Test Lab Date : 4/25/'79 2204 T.H. 86-3 CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Perfo~ned for Legal Description: This Fomn reports: Depth Feet L H KM Lot 2 -BlockTract SOILS TEST yes 7B Date Performed 4/19/79 Subdivision_ The Villages PERCOLATION TEST Soil Characteristics Peat wet Gray silt ~ wet- Bottom of test hole Was Ground Water Encountered yes If YES, What depth? 4' Reading Date Gross T~ne Net TLme Depth to H20 Net Drainage Percolation Rate Minute SEEPAGE PIT D~AIN FIELD Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench absorption system. A second test hole was drilled soils condition exist. Proposed Installation: Depth of Inlet CO)~4ENTS:~- gn~uitable for on this lot and the same Test Performed by. David Paul - Data Certified By:~onstructio~ Test Lab - Date : ' 4/25/79 , ( ( T.H. 86-4 CONSTRUCTION TEST LkB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions 2204 Cleveland .Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Perfomned for L H KM Legal Description: LOt 3 This For9 reports: SOILS TEST Depth soil Characteristics Feet 7B Peat 'wet Brown sandy silt -wet 16' Brown silty sandy gravel Was Ground Water Encountered_ yes If YES, ~,~at depth? 11' Date Performed 4/19/79 Subdivision The Villaqes PERCOLATION TEST · Block Tract yes Reading Date Gross TLme Net TLme Depth to H20 Net Drainage ?ercolation Rate Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench COM/4ENTS:'- - t%o wet for absorption system Test Performed by Day-id Paul Data Certified By:_Con~rn~-~n Date : 4/25/79 Lab ' 2204 (' [ T.H. 86-5 '~ CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB ~ "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions' Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Perfo~ned for Legal Description: This Fomn reports: L H KM Lot 4 -~BlockTract 7B SOILS TEST yes Date Performed 4/19/79 Subdivision The Villages PERCOLATION TEST ~5 Depth Feet Soil Characteristics 2.5' Peat Brov~ silt with occasional gravel wet --- Bottom of test hole Was Ground Water Encountered If YES, What depth? I } Net Drainage Reading Date Gross Tiptoe Net T~me Depth to H20 4/19//~ , 24 hrs.. 16" Percolation Rate Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Dept~ to Bottom of Pit or Trench CO~4ENTS: .... Len. suitab!e for absorption system Test Performed by _P_~diJ_d Paul Data Certified By: m~mS~r~ction Tmst Lak~ Date · ' ' .~/25/7q ~ ~ T.H. 86-6 CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opznions" 2204 Cleveland .Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Perfomned for Legal Description: This For.9 reports: L H KM Lot 5 ~BlockTract 7B SOILS TEST yes Date Performed 4/19/79 Subdivision_ The Vi]]agam PERCOLATION TEST _ y~S Depth Feet Soil Characteristics 2.5' Peat Brown silt Dark brown silty sandy gravel Sandy gravely silt Bottom of test hole Was Ground Water Encountered If YES, ~,~at depth? Reading Date Gross TJ~ne Net TL~e i Depth to H20 Net Drainage 4/19/79 24 Hour 19" 4/20/79 Saturation Pel 27" 18" 0 26" " " 4.0 .____23-.2]-- .25" Percolation Rate Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D~ArN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench CO~4ENTS:~- ~50+ sc~uare feet drainage ~rea. I)nSll~ahl~ ~r ~q-~.~3_f_e absorption system. Test Performed by David paul Data Certified By: Date : rlc~nstr~uction T~st Lab- 4,/? 5/7-9 He~w'll ~( L ounsb'.]r)z ~ ,~ssociate$ Engineers -- Surveyors ~nchoro,]e, ~losko Sheel I of . Tolal D~plh ? ~ ~ '='" ~ Gro~id IVolef Table D[~SCHIPTION b/Is u~ed, elc. T.:I. 86-7 VegeloNon: ?.F~:.'L, , ,}P, · ~ /-~ /?.,~ ,'?o ?ro.~ct No [n~/nee[.~ -- Surveyors ,4nchoro?o, . ,4/osko s~.~¢t I of Totol Depth 1'2 '-"-~'~--~-, r, cld Potty .~cn'p l/n~7 T.II. 30-9 I ::::::::::::::::::::::::: :--: -::: :': : :::'::': ::::::::::::::::::::: :_'.' :':::::_?:-:. '::-:::':- .::.> :::::::::::::::::::::::::: SOILS A F!.(~ Lff S 1 S .I )2--7 SIEVE ANA13'S/S D,~¥ E'~ 'siC. ~o CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 T.H. 86-1] Perfo~ned for Legal Description: This Forr~ reports: Bill Thompson LotTract 8~ Block SOILS TEST yes Date Performed 10/25/79 Subdivision The Villaqes PERCOLATION TEST yes Depth Feet soil Characteristics Peat & Silt Brown Silty (S~) --9' -- Gravelly Sand Bottom of Test Hole Was Ground Water Encountered yes If YES, What depth? 9' 8 Hour saturation Reading Date 8/25/79 ~eriod 8/25/7? Gross T~ne i Net TL~e 0 , 0 min. l0 I No water left after 8 hours. 60 I D~pth to H20 4 5/8" 7 3/4" Net Drainage 3 1/8' lO 3/8" 2 5/8" 30 I l~ 7/8" i 1/2" 40 i 13 5/8" 1 3/4" 50 i ? 14 7/8" 1 1/4" 16 3/8" 1 1/2" Percolation Rate 1/4"/1 Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT DRAIN PIELD Depth of Inlet De~3th to Bottom of Pit or Trench CO.C4ENTS: Test hole logged by ~ill Thompson of Lounsbury & Associates. Pe~ation test run by Construction Test Lab, Inc. 150 square~eet~drainage area required per bedroom. Performed b,y __~)~ Data Certified By: Construction Test Lab Test D.%r~'~Paul Date : 10/29/79 CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" 2204 Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 T.H. 86-13 Performed for Legal Description: This For 9 reports: Steve Havedorn Depth Feet Peat Lot 1 "~BlockTract SOILS TEST yes Brown Soil Characteristics 12' yes silty gravel Bo~om of Test Hole Was Ground Water Encountered If YES, i~llat depth? 10' Date Performed 4/23/79 Subdivision The_?~o~ PERCOLATION TEST Y Reading Date Gross Time ~Net TLme Depth to H20 Net Drainage 4/23/79 ~4 hrs. sat. ~er. 5" 4/24/79 38" 33" ,, . 0 9.75" .... 3 · 0 . . I 3.5 29.75" 19" ,, ,. 4.0 30.75" ]." Percolation Rate 1"/30 Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench CO~4ENTS: .... 2~0 square ~eet drainage area required per bedroom from minus ~ to 6.0' Test Performed by David Paul Data Certified .By.: Construction' Test Lab- ' Date : .... 4/2~9 CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a ThousandOpinions' " 2204 Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 T.H. 86-14 Performed for Steve Havedorn Legal Description: Lot 3 This Fomn reports: SOILS TEST '-:BlockTract yes 14 Date Performed 4/19/79 Subdivision ~h~ Village~ PERCOLATION TEST ~9 Depth Feet Soil Characteristics Peat Brown silt damp 11' Brown Sandy gravel with trace of silt Browm gravelly sand Bottom of test hole Bedrock Was Ground '.',~a ~=er Encountered no If YES, ~'~at depth? Reading Date Gross Time 24et TLme Depth to H20 Net Drainage Per'colation Rate Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench CO)~4ENTS:-~edr~c~ encountered at 14' 150 square feet drainac__e- area' required per bedroom. Test Performed by. David Paul Data Certified By: Constr~0n Te~-t A second test hole was drilled next, to'' Date :._'' ' · 4/25/79 2204 CONSTRUCTION TEST LAB "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Performed for Steve Havedorn Legal Description: ~t 4 This For.~: reports: SOILS TEST Depth Feet u~BlockTract 14 yes Date Performed 4/25/79 Subdivision The Villaqes m PERCOLATION TEST soil Characteristics 6" Peat 6" Bro%~ silt Brown silty' sandy gravel SaturaLed brown silty gravel Bottom Test Hole Was Ground ~'a=~er Encountered 9' If YES, ~at depth? ves Reading Date Gross TL~e zNet T Lme Depth to H20 Net Drainage Percolation Rate Minute Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to Bott~n of Pit or Trench CO?~4ENTS: ..... l~.0.~s¢~are feet drainage area required ~per b_e/l~©©]~7 .... Test Performed by_ David Paul Data Certifie-~ · ]3ate ':' ' 4/25/79 2204 CONSTRUCTION TEST I~B T.H. 86-16 "One Test is worth a Thousand Opinions" Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 Perfomned for Steve Havedorn Legal Description: Lpt 8 ,-:Block Tract 14 This Fomn reports: SOILS TEST yes Date Performedj/23/79 Subdivision The Villages PERCOLATION TEST yes Depth Feet soil Characteristics Peat Brown silty gravel~%]ith~race of sand Brown silty gravelly sand Bottom of test hole Bedrock Was Ground ~,,[ater Encountered no if YES, ~.Fnat depth? Reading Date Gross TL~e I .;Net TLme Depth to H20 Net Drainage 4/23/79 9:25 ~4 Salt. Pr. 34" 4/24/79 No water .... 0 20" " " .3.0 J " -" 3.5 70" RO" .... 4. O 7q. 5" q Percolation Rate 1"/9 Minute Average Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D~AIN FIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to Bottom of Pit or Trench COPCdENTS:.- .Bedrock encountered at 10~ 160 square feet drainage.area required per bedroom. Test Performed by David Paul A second test hole was drilled next to first hole to confirm bedrock. Data Certified By: Construction Test Date ': ~.~_ 4./25~a .st is worth a Thousana !' u.~o~a 2204 Cleveland Anchorage, Alaska '~03 277-0231 T.H, 86-17 ~ jal Description: This Form reports: Steve Chronn (CMSM) Depth Feet ~---~) ~. ~'.:Bloc kTrac~ soILS TEST yes soil'Characteristics Date .Performed_4/2 ~ /79 Subdivision The Villages 6" Peat 15 PERCOLATION TEST Bro~ sandy silty ~ravel -wet- Bottom of test hole Bedrock ~,;as Ground ~fater Encountered If YES, Vrnat depth? no Reading te " Gross Tiptoe . zNet TLme " Depth to H20 t'Net Drainage L p e rcon~ a%ion Rate Minute Proposed 'Installation: SEEPAGE PIT D_~AI/q'TIELD Depth of Inlet Depth to ~ottom o~- Pit or Trench__ Bedrock encountered- at 5' . A second- -~,ENTS: ..... ~' ' ,"' ,j. to con~-i~--~ oeorocK at b'. Test Per~ozvned'JDy Davit Paul Data CertiIiI-ed BY:~tiOP ,~.e La - Date ktv' ' · · 8/25/79 : ' ' _ ....~ .... _2~2 ........ ' "~ · . ::[. :flt~ (. T.H. 86-18 CREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH DEPARTHE'IT OF EHV]RO~iM~HTAL DLIP[.ITY Case 3330 "C" Street ( AHCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 · · . fl Subdi vi si on_%/~F~ Legal Description- ~ -l-~¢~--T This Form ReportS Soils Log_~Z.~ ~/~ ~_ Percolation Test_~\~ Soil Test I,lust Be Logged To 4' Below Proposed Seepage System ¢ 5-- 6-- 7-- Depth Feet Soil Characteris ~c 13--- lq- Was Ground Water Encountered? If Yes, At What Depth? Reading Date Percolation Propos Depth ..ON,'c,IIS: Gross Time Minute Rate ed Installati'on: Seepage Pit of Inlet Depth ~ottom Test Performed Date Depth to H20 Her Dro 2204 CleVeland Anchorage, Alaska 9,. 3 277-0231 T.H. oo-19 e'r~orme for__ ,[ ~1 Description: ?his Form reports: Steve C ~ronn (CM S:4) SOILS TEST yes Depth ~ soil Characteristics Feet ~ Peat Reddish bro~.~ silt Bedrock Bottom of test hole, Ground Water Encountered KES, ¥Inat depth? Date perfOrm, ed. 4/21/76 Subdivision_ The Vi ~ !ac, qs PERCOIzATION TEST iRe ad in~-- Da Gross TLm .'.uNet TLme Depth to H20 Net Dra Lnage · ?erco!ation Rate ._ Minute ~oDosed~.I~nst~-~iation: ' SEEPAGE PIT D_~At~ FIELD_ .- Depth o~ Y_n!et Depth to ~tt~a of - --' .... Data Cert~ed By- ~ ...... u ...... _ ~-~ Test_?cr~o~ned .by N-~I ~ "Date '- ..... 4/2 .... ~ (~ [~//' $OILSL06 T.H. 86-20 MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 825 L, Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 264-4720 SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST PER FORI,' ~ FOR: LEGAL DESCRI'PTION: 1 8 9 10 12 I3 16 17 18 19 20 SLOPE [] PERCOLATION TEST Reading Date Time Time Water Drop i PERCOLATION RATE TEST RUN BETWEEN PERFOR /,ED 8Y:~.~.~'O'-~ (" ~ CERTIFIED BY: FT AND __ FT SOILS LOG T.Ft. 86-21 PERFORMED FOR: MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE [] PERCOLATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TEST 825 L, Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 264~4720 SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 11 12 13 14 t5 16 17 18 19 2O YES, AT WHAT ENCOUNTERED? Reading Date Time NeE DepTh to Net Time Water Orop 2],, 6 ? ,. PERCOLATION RATE ,/~ ~--_ *~inch) TEST RUJ~ BETWEEN _~-r F...~.,a,l'~ ~ ~,T ~ (' MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 825 L Strew, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 264-4720 SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST · ~ SO~LSLdO T.H. [] PERCOLATION TEST SLOPE ~ SITE PLAN 10 11 12 13 · 15 16 17 18 19 2O .OMMENTS PERFORMED Et~: -- ~NCOUN~ERED? ' O I-¢~1 IQ' I ~ IF YES, ATWHAT Reading Date Time Time Water Drop PERCOLATION RATE TEST RUN BETWEEN CERTIFIED BY: "One ~est is ~orhh a Thousand ' 2204 Cleveland D_nch0rage, Alaska 99503 277-0231 P~rfo~ned for L~gal Description: This Form reports: Depth Feet 6" Peat Steve Chronn (CM~.~) 7~-~ 8 b~Block Tract SO[IiLS TEST Soil Characteristics Bro~ sandy gr~val -damp- trace of silt Bottom of test hole Bedrock Drilled two hast holes south of the 1st hole and ~ {~ n-~ bedrock a{ 5.5' and 7.5'. T. F,.. 86-23 15 Date .Performed 4/20/79 Subdivision The Villages PERCOLATION.TEST Was Ground Water Encountered no If '"~ ~S, ~aat depth? Reading Date Gross TLme . ~Net TLme Depth to H20 I Net Drainage lPerco!ation Rate >! J-n ut e Proposed Installation: SEEPAGE PIT DRAIN FIELD Depth of W--nlet Depth. to Bottom of. Pit Or Trench .C~2{ENTS: ...... ......... Bedrock.enocuntered ~t 8'-. . .................................. ..... ' .... ~ .... - '- ' ' ' Date ' ',~/~'~a T.H. 86-24 "One T¢' is worth a Thousand Opi' ~s" 2204 Cleveland Anghorage, Alaska 9950~ 277-0231 r ,~o_~ned for ~.~ Description: :is Form reports: Steve cb~ronn (C~!SM) Date Performed 4/21/79 The Villages 5 ~ ~- kmract 15 Subdivision SOILS TEST yes PERCOIzXTION TEST lepth Soil'Characteristics ~eet Peat Bro~ si~t -wet- Bro~ silty sand Bottom of test hole Bedrock' !as Ground Water Encountered. no f YES, %~at depth? '~eading Date Gross Time :Net T~me Depth to H20 ?erco]_at~on Rate Minute Proposed installation: SEEPkGE PIT D~A~N FIELD Deoth of ~_nlet Depth to ~ottom of Pit or Trench ~ENT~: ......... BedrOCk encountered at 4' ............... Net Drainage ~est Performed David--Paul Data ........ Date ..~: ' ' ' ~/'2 ~i'/~-~-' I t DESCRIP?IOVII r ,' "~. - T.H. 86-25 ALASKA ~flUIROFhm~F~TAL CO~hTROL $6FMUIC~S, IFh£. PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET CLIENT ADDRESS ZIP CODE DATE ~-- ~ ~ / LEC~L LOCATION '7~,/~CF TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE ZONE TESTED ~ ,] ft TO D. ~ 'ft F READI h'G # CLOCK TIME NET TIME DEPTH TO DATUM NET DROP IRATE (min/in) ~'!NAL PERCOLATI.ON RATE (min/in)