HomeMy WebLinkAboutGINAMI HILLS Lots 2A & 2B S-6967Lo{s 2. A, Z. B
~4UNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE ~
Departmen~f Health & Environmental~'otection
Environmental Health Division
Case Review Worksheet
Case Number t Date Received
S-6967 / April 12, 1983
Comments Due By
April 29, 1983
Subdivision or Project Title:
Lots 2A, 2B Ginami Hills Subdivision
( ) Public water available
( ) Community water available
( ) Public sewer available
Comments:
C
,. & 'ENGINEERS, INC. ~ '
LEGAL O£SCF(IPTION:
!
8
9
!0
11
12
14
15
!6
!?
18
19
20
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 995~
349-656l
SOILS LOG :- PERCOLATION TEST
/.£'- 7' C~Z4
IEST
.~ t;.x~'. ...... '%o ='
'-..* ',
PER, FORMEO
SLOPE SITE PLAN
2
3: oor/4
Time
0
Oepth to
%¥ater
S'C.y" ,:~"
5' 7"-/"
_¢' z~" ?5"
TEST'RUN DETV,,'EEN , .~.5.-~ . FT AND ~ FY
S 6 9 6 7 MAY 02.?983'
USEDn
_E/II¢- ,5~ Pr~~~ &
METHOD 'USED S
ORILLER /'¢'~ ("""°'~ /L
TIME STARTEO -,,/,'"~ "'. 5(')
SOILS
ENGINEERS, INC.
LOG
f;'t.-'A, .. FINISHEO
,,..~ t O o pV, A
VEGETATION, DRAINAGE & GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY
:ATION DIAGRAm' NOTES
YARVINg, ICE I~I'PE, BONDING OR TouGHNESS, DRILLING NOTES
SHEET / O'F_]-----
HOLE ~ .[
TOTAL DEPTH ./~'~'
PROJECT -,¢' ,~"' F -
PROJECT
GROUND WATER
TIME '1 /
OR
J
,~' £NGINEERS, INC.
s
pEHFOHMED FOR'
ANCHOHAGb-, ALASK, A
549 - 6561-
SOILS LOG -- PERCOLATION TEST
o -/, ?¢
!
5
6--
7
8
9
10
11
12
I'~ RCOL ATION
TEST
SITE PlAN
j'-//
SLOPE
Time
o
S
L
'O
P
E
SHEET I O'F..
MACHINE U~,ED
.~. ~,o~,,...// s SOILS
¢///~-.~< ,o,,'// & ENGINEERS, INC,
METHOD USED S ~ LOG .oLs ¢.1 ~
DRILLER ~'~¢ LOGGER ~'¢~k ~i~ PROJECT¢ ~'-
- PROJECT P¢~I'P¢ ~'~
TIME STARTED ~tOCP~ FINISHED 3: ¢O ¢~ DATE
VEGETATION~ DRAINAGE ~ ,GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY GROUND WATER
~J~r> ~, .~/%~f ~ ~ ~),' ~{D'//)~.~o~. TIME ~ w ·
/ LOCATION QIAGRAM & NOTES///X~ /~
~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~IPTI~- 9: ~' ':, ~ - 'R , "- .R, ~AAIN, SHAPE, LAYERING OR
~ ~; ~ ~ N ~ ~ m ~ ~ o VARVINQ, ICE ~PE, BONDIN~ OR TOUGHNESS, DRILLIN9 NOTES
.., ~ . - o - f ~ ~ ~,,,'~ Y,.~ d~ , , ~ I., ,%//~ , hX'/4~ ....
..... ' ~. ~.,
_ - _ ~- ,~"~
.... ,. ¢
'L~: L:7~.,.,'(~ .... . .
. ~..- 2 ~._..._l -.
.... j
........ ::.0~ ~ '. ~ " . :'"-'--'
.'. ' ,- ~ 7~"~.U ~:~zP ' ~ .
~ .- ,~ q'~ '. . , . .
~ ;2:., ~:~ ~::~ ~.,~:.;~. ~,,: ,::,-:..,.. . ;...: .~Z~..~.~ ..... /~ ...... : .,,.-...~z, .~_- ~ ~ ~.._ ; "- =~'z:' t~-'-"~-~' ~':/~- ~: ~'~Z~
=t~:-*'-': IS- ~-?:, 7i - · : ..: . "-'(~.':'_:'. - '
. .:..-.:- :~' . "- .' .. . . · . -- . ,.: : ., -.. - _. ;- "'./ ~..-'. - .-.
'.'. '",' ~-~ i: ,;--.':".::"', '
~' '--'" ~'~ *~ ;-: :~;'.'W~-:'"~¢~":"'~ '~ ~--~ ~¢-- ~' "¢"" ' ' ; -:
"'-_;':¢;: '7:-: ', ~t. 9:: ¢ ....... '- ''~" '""~"': '"'" ' -"" ..... " ..... ' .... ' ..... " '
S
&
S
ENGINEERS, INC.
7125 OLD SEWARD H'W~
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99505
349-6561
SOILS LOG . PERCOLATION TES1
I'Et~COLATION
rEST
LEGAL L)E $CHIPTION
6 --pglzc.
8
SLOPE
10
11
12
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTEREO?
YES. AT WHAT
1,4
15
16
.....
'20 ~'
TEST RUI TWEEN
~ -.. ~
COMMENTS ": ' ;' - ~'"" :
- - '~_ -': ?': ., · , : '~/::
.,,.o0, ,o,-~, ..... ?: ~ :.:~"-.:: ..: -(:~_?-_ .... '.-
/
/
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
APPEAL PACKET
CASE NO. S-2789
GINKMI HILLS SUBDIVISION
Assembly Memorandum No. 72-640A, October 30, 1972
Petitioner's Appeal Letter
Answer to Appeal, Assembly Memorandum No. 72-640
Sketch Map of Subject Property
Planning Commission Minutes, September 13, 1972
Planning Staff Memorandum, RE: Subdivision Plat
to Planning Commission, August 23, 1972
1 page
2 pages
2 pages
1 page
2 pages
1 page
First Submission to Board of Adjustment:
Second Submission to Board of Adjustment:
October 30, 1972
Submitted by Planning Department
GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH, ALASKA
DATE:
TO:
ASSEMBLY MEMORANDUM NO. 72 - 640A
ober 30, 1
%Q~oug~s~bly (Board of Adjustment)
FROM: Borough Administration
SUBJ:
Subdivision Case No. S 2789
Replat of Lot 7, Ginami Hills Subdivision
Appeal by Lawrence R. McCubbins
Presented herewith is the Appeal Packet on the above noted
matter. This item has been set for consideration before the
Board of Adjustment November 13, 1972.
Respectfully submitted,
JR:VRW: vec
Attachments
//~.~/Jack ~ode~ick
Borough Mayor
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUB J:
~.~
Submitted by Planning Dept.
GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH, ALASKA
ASSEMBLY MEMORANDUM NO. 72-640
October 30, 1972
Borough Assembly (Board of Adjustmcn0
Borough Administration
Subdivision Case S-2789
Replat of Lot 7, Giaami !Iills Subdivision
Appeal by Lawi:cncc R. McCubbins
I. Sumnmry of Past Action: This appeal involves a subdivision that was
approved by the Platting i3eard on September 13, 1972, subject to the
following three conditions:
Dedicating a road that folk;ws the natural contours of the land
from Uppa. r Huffman to the northeast corner of the subdivision.
Providing the I)epartment of ElwJronmental Quality with soils
information and sizing the lots accordingly.
3. That the drafting and surveying requirements of thc Borough
be met.
The appellant contends that the first two conditions of approval required by
the Platting Board should be waived by the Board of Adjustment.
II. Description of Proposed Subdivision: The property involved is located
next to Upper ttuffman Road; is five acres in area; contains steep Mope
conditions and is proposed to be split into four lots.
III. Answer to Appeal: ]'he Platting Board's action in regard to this appli-
cation was based upon an anticipated need for future neighborhood streets
in this general vicinity, plus the need to have positive proof that all the
lots are capable of supporting both on-site sewer and water systems. The
Platting Board did not deny this plat and they have not prohibited the
appellant from developing a four-lot subdivision. The Board~s action was
based on a proper concern for the health and safety of those persons who
will be building a home and living on each of these lots and for the general
public in regard to an adequate furore traffic circulation pattern.
Assembly Memorandum No. 72-640
October 30, 1.972
Page 2
The legal right of the platting authority to require the dedication of adequate
streets and to assure that a subdivision is capable of supporting the antici-
pated development is well-established by Statute and legal case history.
IV. Conclusion and Recommendation: The Administration recommends that
the decision of the Planning Commission be upheld and that this appeal be
denied.
Respectful]y submitted,
Jack Roderick
Borough Mayor
JIviA :I)GB :rvd
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting: September.13, 1972
facilities.
Page No. 15
MR. STRICJiLAND, Department of Environmental Quality, stated that they have soils
information on the lots and could recom~end approval if the lots were split down
the middle so that the lots were of a more equal size.
Mr. Crow moved, seconded by Mr. Wiley that the plat
of BLM Small Tract Lot 95 be approved (Case No.
S 2811) subject to:
!.~ Equalizing the lots
2. Minor drafting revisions
Voted for the motion.: Berg, Crow, Evans, Kallenberg,
Matthews, Scik'regg, Sturgulewski and Wiley. The motion
carried ung'~imously.
6. S 2812 Subdivision of 4.7 acres in the NE¼ of Section 15, T12N, R3W,
S.M., Alaska, to be designated GALATCf SUBDIVISION located
on the a~outh side of Abbott Road, west of Birch Road. FINAL
MR. SCHEEN explained that i e o~.a~er had requested that this mat'ter be postPoned
for three weeks, so that revisions could be made. ~.
Mrs. Matthews moved, seconded by Mrs. Selkregg that at the
request of the petitioner, that Case No. S 2812, GALAXY
SUBDIVISION, be postponed for three weeks.
All Commissioners voted in favor of the motion.
~.,~7. S 2789 Subdivision of 5 acres of Lot 7, Ginami Hills Subdivision in
the SE¼ of Section 24, T12N, R3W, S.M., Alaska, located on
the north side of Huffman Road, east of Birch Road. FINAL
MR. SCHEEN explained that this had been reviewed as a preliminary at the last
subdivision meeting. ~e staff had received the final in the office prior to
acting on the preliminary so the final does not reflect the direction given to
the preliminary plat.
The staff would recommend that the plat be approved, subject to:
1. Dedicating a road which follows the natural contours of the
land from Upper Huffman to the NE corner of the subdivision
2. Providing DEQ with soils information and sizing the lots in
accordance with this information
3. Meeting the established drafting and survey requirements of
the Borough
MR. STRICKk%YD, the Department of Envirorunental Quality, stated that hah ad .
talked to the owner and engineer after the preliminary approval, requesting
soils information. They had not received it as yet, and there could be a very
substantial change to these lots, as this is a questionable area.
Planning and Zoning Cormn.~lssion
Meeting: Septen'.~er 13, 1972
' )
Page No. 16
CO:~-[ISSIONFR SELKREGG felt that it should be postponed as the c~anges would be
substantial and important.
Mr. Berg moved, seconded by Mrs. Selkregg that this plat
(Case No. S 2789) be postponed until the next subdivision
meeting.
MR. SCHEEM co~ented that the stated intent of the petitioner was to hurry up
the process. D~ere was a 30-day cut-off period. If he submits a preliminary
....... and-waits-for'Commission-- approvaZ,-30 days' have'gone by, and then'the~ are ........
talking about 60 to 80 days for final approval. In an attempt to expedite his
plat, he submitted it before the Commission took action on the preliminary.
The staff has had conversation with the engineer and they are in the process
of making the changes requested in the preliminary. The plat would not be filed
until the changes were made. They are not trying to get approval of something
other than what was given to the preliminary.
The Chairman called for the vote on the postponing motion:
Voted for the motion: Berg, Kallenberg, Sel~regg and
Sturgulewski. Voted against the motion: Crow, Evans,
Matthews and Wiley. The motion failed.
Mr. Evans moved, seconded by Mr. Crow that the plat of
GIN~MI HILLS be approved, subject to:
1. Dedication of a road which follows the natural con-
tours of the land from Upper Huffman to the NE corner
of the subdivision
2. Providing DEQ with soils information and sizing the
lots in accordance with this information
3. Meeting the drafting and survey requirements of the
Borough
COMMISSIONER EVANS stated that he would like to hear again from Mr. Scheen.
MR. SCHEEN stated that he be!i~v~d these changes were being made. The engineer
was in the office and picked up the list of chmtges and noted them on the plat
and stated that he was going to make them. If these changes are not made, the
plat will not be filed.
The Chairman called for the vote on the motion to approve the plat subject to
the staff conditions:
Voted for the motion: Berg, Crow, Evans, Kallenberg,
Matthews, Sturgulewski and Wiley. Voted against the
motion: Selkregg. The motion carried.
Planning and Zoning ~6~mission
m
Memorandum - August 23, 1972
5. S-2789
GINAMI HILLS.SUBDIVISION
Subdivision
S-2789 - Subdivision of 5 ± acres of Lot 7, Ginami'Hills Sub-
division, SL/~ SE~, Section 24, T12N, R3bl, S.~4., Alaska to be
designated Lots 7A, 78, 7C and 7D, Ginami Hills Subdivision
(located on the north side of Huffman Road, east of Birch Road).
(Lawrence NcCdbbins) PRELIMINARY
REQUEST:
To subdivide a 5-acre parcel into four lotso
~,,~. ,,is D-acre parcel ,s located where Upper Huffman Road takes the first
sharp bend to the right anl starts ~witchbacking up the side of the mountain.
This site is wooded and.vacant. It slopes to the northwest gradually near
Ginami Street and more steeply towards the easterly boundary.
ZONING: Presently Unrestricted and proposed for R-6 as part of Area "G".'
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS: The purpose of this preliminaKy plat mas to establish
needed road ri§hts-of-way. Half of the Upper Huffman alignment has been
dedicated by adjacent property ov~ners to the south of this parcel. Staff
recommends that this plat dedicate the other half of Upper Huffman for
approximately 2/3 of the length of this plat. It appears to be unfeasible
to extend Upper Huffman any further because of the rapid increase in grade.
Because of this steep slope, access to the property to the east and north-
east of this parcel must logically be Qained throuqh this lot. We also
reco~¢nd therefcre that a road be ded~'cated along the west and north
boundary of Lot 7B to provide access to that unsubdivided land to the east
of this parcel. Should the owner not desire to dedicate this road, we
would then suggest that he furnish us with topographic data to show another
feasible means of providing access to these adjacent properties.
We have received no soils data on this site and prior to final approval
we wo~ld request that the lot sizes be justified by submitting soils infor-
ma ti on.
RECOM:,L: L.qTION. Staff recommends grantino preliminary approval to this plat
subject t¢ the foll¢~ing conditions:
1. Dedicating a 25-foot one-half right-of-way for the Uoper Huffman Road
alignment from Ginami Street to the boundary of Lot 7D.
2. Dedicatinfl a road that follows the natural contours of the land from
Upper Huffman to the northeast corner of the subdivision.
3. Providing the Department of Environmental Quality with soils information
and sizing the lots in accordance with this information.
4. Meeting the established draftino and survey reeuirements of .the Greater
Anchorage Area Borough.