Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDELAKS ADDITION LT 12Bbekik's Lot 12B #090-021-49 Municipality of Anchorage On -Site Water and Wastewater Section - (907) 343-7904 Page of ON-SITE WASTEWATER INSPECTION REPORT Permit Number: OSP221241 PID Number: 090-021-49 Dwelling: ® Single Family (SF) ❑ with ADU ❑ Duplex (D) ❑ Two Single Family Project: ❑ New ® Upgrade Name PIPER &TYLER MACHAMER ABSORPTION FIELD — EXISTING ❑ Deep Trench ❑ Wide Trench ❑ Bed ❑ Mound Site Address 307 SAWMILL ROAD, BIRD CREEK, AK 99540 ❑ Other Phone Number of Bedrooms Soil Rating Total depth from original grade 3 GPD/SF Ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Depth to pipe invert from original grade Ft. Gravel depth beneath pipe Ft. Subdivision Block Lot DELAKS ADDITION 12B Fill added above original grade Ft. Gravel length Ft. Township Range Section Gravel width Ft. Beds: Number of Lines Distance between lines Ft. SEPARATION DISTANCES To Septic Absorption Lift Station Holding Sewer Total absorption area Number of trenches Dist. between trenches From Tank Field Tank Line Ft2 Ft. Well *75'+ __ 25'+ TANK ❑ Septic ® S.T.E.P. ❑ Holding ❑ Other: AX STEP Manufacturer ANCHORAGE TANK Capacity 1500 Gal. Surface water 100'+ -- Material POLY COATED STEEL Number of compartments 2 Lot Line 5'+ _- NA Foundation 10'+ ILIFT STATION Manufacturer ORENCO Capacity 1500 Gal. Remarks *PER EXISTING MOA WAIVER Alarm location 1ST FLOOR Electrical installed by PLC AARON CHAMBERS) Installer NORTHERN EXCAVATION PIPE MATERIAL House to tank 3034 d a afield Tank to 3034 Drainfield 3034 CO/MT 3034 Inspector FWC BENCH MARK (Assumed elevation) 100 ft Inspection 1'` 8/5/22 2nd 8/6/22 Location and description 3`d 41h METAL FRONT DOOR JAM ON-SITE WATER AND WASTEWATER SECTION APPROVAL �- OF ACq� Conditional Approval: Date TM • • • • • • • • • • • •vim• Septic System Curtis Huffman �� Approved '�-- Date ZS '/ L , CE 128991 •`�% VIP, "•. 8/17/22 'O pROFESSIONP�'" Note: this approval does not include well permit requirements. `�\��ll�� tr[Cv uUmL/ 10) PID: 090-021-49 PERMIT: OSP221241 LOT 12A 9,8' 0 HOLE M ® LOT 5B ELECTRICAL hG ® B INSPECTION PIPE TO GO AWAY. EXISTING BM ' Gam} -'v OLD MT 3BR HOUSE DRIVE Q�SyJ BASEMENT A O O D �.� ACCESS DECOMMISSIONED DCO EXISTING S.T. & UFT STATION M E QQ & INSTALLED NEW -- O / MH 1500—GAL ANCHORED / STEEL STEP SEPTIC TANK _ W/ DCO BEFORE STEP. LOT 12B / DRIVE P 75' WELL RADIUS ` RP STAKED PRIOR TO y� / CONST. 100' WELL RADIUS / LOT 12C '• • A—C=32,2' "0� 98.35 B—C=45,8' �F A—D=37.1' 95.06 SURVEY: INS /— B—D=50.2' FWCS SCALE: 1,500 -GALLON 94 48 A—E=44,0' ANCHORED sTm STEP B—E=57.0' i I TANK DELAKS ADDITION LT 12B PREPARED FOR: PIPER & TYLER MACHAMER 307 SAWMILL ROAD BIRD CREEK, AK 99540 FIRST WATER CONSULTING GRADE SEPTIC SECTION SCALES NTS 13030 SUES WAY ANCHORAGE, AK 99516 907-350-9566 FirstWaterAK©gmail.com MT EXISTING FIELD SUPPORT SERVICE a • DATE: 8/17/2022 SURVEY: LCG DRAWN: FWCS SCALE: 1" = 30 9 TH tis Huffman .04 CE 128991 8/17/2022 e "-�?oftssio';� LIIC II[ Municipality of Anchorage C11 urLln P.O. Box 196650 • 4700 Elmore Road Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 ® (907) 343-7904 • Fax (907) 343-7997 http://www.muni.org/Onsite Development Services Division On -Site Water and Wastewater Program * * * * VARIANCE/WAIVER REVIEW * * * * Waiver#: OSV221046 COSA#:OSC221404 PID#: 090-021-49 Legal Description: Delak Addition Lt 12B Engineer: First Water Consultincg Permit#: OSP221241 Your request for a waiver of the required 100 feet horizontal separation from the septic tank to the private well has been approved. The approved separation distance is 75.0 feet. In addition, the field is approved to be 95 feet from the well. This waiver approval applies to the existing septic tank and field only. Any future upgrade to the on-site wastewater disposal system will require all separation distances be met or another approval from this department. .................. a E N X N a ................. 0 a 0 0 N N 0 E 0 X E N ....................... ■ 1 Waiver is Granted: X Waiver is not Granted: Date: g % Z Z Approved by: &Z Name of Reviewer ............................................................4pps■ a E E N K E ....... ■ 1 **** VARIANCE/WAIVER REVIEW **** 0 Flidast Wala"er C 0 N S U L T I N G IA' AI f R / VV < T[ fR ;U P v r3HI i,A n.'-i2'aC 13030 Sues Way, Anchorage, AK 99516 907-350-9566 / frstwaterAK@gmail.com July 1, 2022 Municipality of Andmrage On-site Water and Wastewater REVIEWED FOR CODE CONPUAW OSP221241, Deb Mckenf m, 07/17 Municipalities of Anchorage On -Site Water & Wastewater Program 4700 Elmore Road Anchorage, AK 99507 RE: SEPTIC TANK UPGRADE PERMIT W/ MOA WIAVER LEGAL: DELAKS ADDITION LOT 12B The owner has requested that we obtain a septic permit to upgrade the existing aged steel septic STEP tank on the above referenced lot. We propose to install a 1500 -gallon steel tank per the attached design to serve the existing 3 -bedroom residence. Due to site and area constraints, the STEP will be installed in the same location as the existing tanks and we respectfully request continuance of the 75' MOA waiver because of the improved tank material, the well is on the opposite of the house with a 100' run, ... The continuance of this MOA waiver is justified for these reasons. The lot and area are served by private wells. The design will not impact any of the neighboring properties. Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, &A(6 L^1__ Curtis Huffman, P.E. C�Jt+3Ul7?N6 �EFVICEE / SII;WA1 ER .. UPPCR;u PI.9hINC Q Ln 0 J O Ln O O�-Zw ♦l O 2 1 O Q p<0 p�j N M00 L N NO C LO 0 =.0 -T Z Jwviw N Z Z 0K Iw 8E�O > 7 C) Ln d U w O Z F > Z wo O w "v,? J } O J � 0 O O r 3v� •d � � to Lo v O Q < Q ox ¢u �Zw ZZ� c > o N N .4 ?S fl t/) Lu f):: (' uap g a Y .0 V w 0 QU > V a2Z 6 0 w _ UJ LL A O �w ~~ V 0 `u4 K L'i `- D �Z 2W�Zp °J N `°pZWC LL z Oz m y N Ouv+ wS w'¢.. Z wJ - Z� d0O m LL Z a SuZ¢w a�~a g0w 2pazOr Z z Z� MCO w w � M 0 o 4 N 0 L Z N ZO~Z Z -- 2 o 0Z w v N Ou O O J w x -O u xr ^ M z 3 -<- o I I _� ZO�0 O �-Zam O oo l7 QLn X oUJ w 0 w o00 OO¢=0 ::w QI— w¢T< z�Z�Z m �� u p 2 p w O w¢7¢ F- ZZ> Z w W 0 wCF� �'w�2a 0 0 7 U J tn= >a¢w w¢r w w Q z ?j �n..n O w¢¢ 0 a w vu Ln O Ln O Q ♦l O 2 1 O Q i N M M uI W p�j N M00 L N NO C LO 0 =.0 -T > CIO M t W N > 7 C) Q o U3 J } x x C) O O � Cl) /j ( co W J (n w w O Ln Q 0 O N n E Ln m w Q i N M M uI W p�j N M00 L N NO C LO 0 =.0 >, N N C C C U > CIO M t W Ln N Q -C 0 d 0. Q Q x J } x x � Cl) /j ( x W x � S F_) o y 1/5 : w 0 0 w O Ln cn Y N n E Ln m w a Q N i N M M uI W p�j N M00 L N NO C LO 0 =.0 >, N N C C C U O� M t W Ln N Q -C 0 d 0. Q Permit Number:OSP221241 Tax Code Number:09002149000 Work Type:SepticTank Upgrade Effective Date: Design Engineer: Site Legal Address:DELAKS ADDITION LT 12B G:4660 Owner:MACHAMER PIPER J Site Mailing Address:307 SAWMILL RD, Indian Lot Size in Sq Ft:22190 Total Bedrooms:3 This permit is for the construction of: Disposal Field Septic Tank Holding Tank Privy Private Well Water Storage All construction shall be in accordance with: 1. The attached approved design. 2. All requirements specified in Anchorage Municipal code Chapters 15.55 and 15.65 and the State of Alaska Wastewater Disposal Regulations (18AAC72) and Drinking Water Regulations (18AAC80) 3. The wastewater code requires inspections during the installation. The engineer shall notify the Development Services Department per AMC 15.65. Provide notification by calling (907) 343-7904 (24/7). 4. From October 15 to April 15, a subsurface soil absorption system under construction during freezing weather shall be either: a. Opened and Closed on the same day, or b. Covered, sealed, and heated to prevent freezing 7/17/2022 7/17/2023 FIRST WATER CONSULTING Expiration Date: ¨þ ¨¨¨¨ Received By: Issued By: Date: Date: MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE On-Site Water & Wastewater Program PO Box 196650 4700 Elmore Road Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 Phone: (907) 343-7904 Fax: (907) 343-7997 http://www.muni.org/onsite On-Site Wastewater Disposal System Permit Deb Wockenfuss 7/17/22 7/17/2022 Development Services Department Phone: 907-343-7904 On -Site Water & Wastewater Section Fax: 907-343-7997 ON-SITE SEPTIC/WELL PERMIT APPLICATION Parcel I.D. 090-021-49 Property owner(s) TYLER & PIPER MACHAMER Day phone Mailing address 307 SAWMILL ROAD, BIRD CREEK, AK 99540 Site address 307 SAWMILL ROAD, BIRD CREEK, AK 99540 Legal description (Sub'd., Block & Lot) DELAKS ADDITION LT 12B Legal description (Township, Range & Section) Lot Size 22,190 Sq. Ft. Number of Bedrooms 3 APPLICATION IS FOR: APPLICATION IS AN: TYPE OF DWELLING: (® all that apply) Absorption Field ❑ Initial ❑ Single Family (SF) El (w/wo ADU) Septic Tank 0 Upgrade ED Duplex (D) El Holding Tank El Renewal El Multiple Dwellings ❑ Privy ❑ (SF and/or D) Private Well ❑ Water Storage ❑ THIS APPLICATION INCLUDES A WAIVER REQUEST FOR: Distance: I certify that the above information is correct. I further certify that this is in accordance with applicable Municipal Codes. (Signature of property owner or authorized agent) Permit/Rush Fees: - 5 Date of Payment: Receipt Number: 'L. 1.6 GOO Permit No. 021JJ i �q 1 Waiver Fees: Date of Payment: Receipt Number: Waiver No. GADevelopment Services\Building Safety\On Site Water and Wastewater\Forms\Client Forms\Permit Application.doc 13030 Sues Way, Anchorage, AK 99516 907-350-9566 / firstwaterAK@gmail.com July 1, 2022 Municipalities of Anchorage On-Site Water & Wastewater Program 4700 Elmore Road Anchorage, AK 99507 RE: SEPTIC TANK UPGRADE PERMIT W/ MOA WIAVER LEGAL: DELAKS ADDITION LOT 12B The owner has requested that we obtain a septic permit to upgrade the existing aged steel septic STEP tank on the above referenced lot. We propose to install a 1500-gallon steel tank per the attached design to serve the existing 3-bedroom residence. Due to site and area constraints, the STEP will be installed in the same location as the existing tanks and we respectfully request continuance of the 75 MOA waiver because of the improved tank material, the well is on the opposite of the house with a 100 run, The continuance of this MOA waiver is justified for these reasons. The lot and area are served by private wells. The design will not impact any of the neighboring properties. Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, Curtis Huffman, P.E. Municipality of Anchorage On-site Water and Wastewater REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE OSP221241, Deb Wockenfuss, 07/17/22 FIRST WATER CONSULTING DELAKS ADDITION LT 12B DESIGN DETAILS: NO WELLS WITHIN 100' OF PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK EXCEPT AS NOTED. DESIGN PER MOA DOCS & LCG/LANTECH ASB. VERIFY & STAKE ALL WELLS IF NEEDED.. Municipality of Anchorage On-site Water and Wastewater REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE OSP221241, Deb Wockenfuss, 07/17/22 rTh Municipality of Anchorage Page _Lor= DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION P.O. iBox 196650 • Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 • Telephone: 343-4744 On -Site Wastewater Disposal System and/or Well Inspection Report Permit Number: N. A PID 0900 ai Number: y 9 Name: Lance Now land `/ Rick Cwar/oo Address: Wastewater System: 0 New Upgrade ' H c 522 Cox84-3S, Dsrd Ck Ak Phone: ABSORPTION FIELD (ESki t) rNo. of Bedrooms: 3 .- 6si 259 3 0 Deep Trench 0 Shallow Trench 0 Bed 0 Mound 0 Other LEGAL DESCRIPTION Soil Rating:Total GPD/Sq FI. Depth from original grade: Lot IS Township:Ft Block: Subdivision: DclakiAdirfron Depth to pipe bottom from original grade: Ft Gravel depth beneath pipe I Range: I Section: Fill added above original grade: FI Gravel length: WELL: Opp) 0 New 0 Upgrade Classification Gravel width: 1 Ft Number of lines: Ft Ioisunee between line,: (Pnvate, A,B,C): Driller Total Depth: Ft. Cased To: FI. Total absorption area: SO FI Pipe material: FL Yield;Pump Date Dr tied: Slew Water Levol: FI. Installer; as Repaint / y D to le Redmuwo( Date Installed: w/7/96" GPM I Set at: I H Casing ight Above Ground. 1 Ft. TANK (e pi t) SEPARATION DISTANCES AI• /I, D Septic O Holding ❑ S.T.E P. To From Septic Tank Absorption Field Lit SIalion Holding Tank PubI,NPnvale Saw. Lyn Manulacturer: C:DaCily In gallons: Well Material: Number of Compartments: Surlace Water LIFT STATION ss (at) Lot Line Size In gallons: I Manufacturer; Foundation Curtain "Pump on" level at: I ''Pump otr level at: High water alarm at: Drain Pump Make a Model I Elec nidal Inspections performed by: Remarks: As-5u,lt inqeciton renal BENCH MARK (N.4) k. ,�oCLIMen'/ reeecirs k ,ca,l,., �, Location and De:ariplion: peal mound Sy.s/-.w, _tet a tAt.0/,00( Ver La/ do ts- phoe, -S/,/ 3 J I Assumed Elevation: Ft ENGINEER'S SEAL Inspections performed by: flaf4e'd T�u4 Svc Dates: 1sLla/7/9l ... .: . ... 1 �' Department of Health and Human Servicesapproval Reviewed and approved by: Date: _ 1-017(Rom bgil MO* 25 r* )),,, �}ri�^" . SLI3-14-0-.L.: CZ -a:::: ) • .. �i : ••• PERMIT NO: N/A PID NO: 09002149 SWING TIES: FROM: COR. "8" COR. "C" TO: TM. "F" 50' 75' D.F. M.T. "G" 66.5' 94.5' PERC. TEST "I" 63' 94' LOT 12A LOT 12C WELL ►. EXISTING 3 BDRM HOUSE "A" LOT 12B EXISTING SEPTIC TANK EXISTING LIFT STATION • H..... �n / CE 25:)v LOT 5A • , LOCATION OF TEST HOLE FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING "F" "B" • •. • • LOCATION OF PERC TEST 1.25" DIA. SCHED 4 PVC PAGE 2 OF 3 LOT 5B EXISTING 7' x 70' SOIL ABSORPTION DRAINFIELD W.18"TOTAL GRAVEL "G" "I" • • . DRAINFIELD MONITOR TUBE • . • . • • 4' DIA D-3034 CONNECTOR / / • / / / O� / i 40 •' / /• PO O 1 / / 4P / • • / QP • / ,o / / / L12B, DELAK'S ADDN. BIRD CREEK SEPTIC SYSTEM MODIFICATION AS -BUILT INSPECTION REPORT FLATTOP TECHNICAL SERVICES 14530 ECHO STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99516 SCALE: 1" . 30' - 0' DRAWN BY TFM NOVEMBER, 1996 X Stied- 3 of 3 L'1 J!�T�.OriPTECHNICAL SERVICES CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • ENERGY CONSERVATION & ANALYSIS THEODORE F. MOORE, P.E. PH: (907) 345-1355 M.O.A. DHHS P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 99519 Dear Sus: 14530 ECHO ST. November 16, 1996 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99516 The purpose of this letter is to describe the modifications which were performed at the request of your office to eliminate the on-going problem of untreated wastewater daylighting from the side of the existing peat mound serving the 3 bedroom residence on Lot 12B of Delak's Addition, located on Sawmill road in bird Creek. This letter is to be included as Sheet 3 of 3 of the as -built inspection report. A test hole was dug on October 7, 1996 to a depth of 9.75 feet at the location shown on sheet 2 and no groundwater was encountered. Since the bottom of the sewer gravel in the residual disposal drainfield is approximately 4 feet below ground level, this indicates that the drainfield does have the required 4 foot vertical separation from groundwater. A percolation test of the sand stratum underlying the drainfield was conducted on the same date at the location shown on sheet 2 which showed there to be a perc rate of less than one minute per inch. Based on this perc rate, the design application rate for septic tank effluent should be 1.2 gpd/sq. ft, with no sand filter required since the material perc'ed was predominantly sand. The required absorption area for a three bedroom residence is (3 x 150)/1.2 = 375 square feet. The effective absorption area of the existing drainfield which is reported to be 7' x 70' with 18" of sewer gravel (12" below the horizontal distribution pipes) can be calculated to be 560 square feet ((7' x 70') for the base + (1' x 70') for the sidewalls). This indicates that the drainfield is adequately sized for a three bedroom residence. The pre-existing peat mound system was modified on October 7, 1996 by re -plumbing the discharge line from the existing lift station tank to bypass the existing peat mound and pump directly into the existing residual disposal bed. The new pressure discharge line is 1.25" dia.. schedule 40 PVC, and the connection into the existing horizontal distribution pipes in the drainfield was as follows: The existing 4" pert pipes were cut at the point of connection and horizontal tees installed to allow installation of a horizontal 4" connector between the two perforated pipes. A third tee was installed vertically in the middle of this connector with an adapter connecting it to the 1.25" dia. discharge line from the lift station. The purpose of this inspection report is solely to document the modifications made to alleviate the effluent daylighting problem, and the report does not purport to certify compliance with separation distance requirements between wells and septic systems on this and adjacent lots. Please feel free to give me a call if you have any questions on this modification. Sincerely, Ted Moore, P.E. December 18, 1990 Dan Roth; An April 16, 1990 letter from John Smith informed us that a leakage of wastewater effluent near the SW coener of the peat mound made the regrading around the mound impossible until you had checked the leakage after the spring break-up. With winter here again what did you find regarding the leakage? When will you regrade the grounds? Please give us a complete update on our on site sewage disposal system. Sincerely, Lance and Judith Nowland P.O. Box 103? Woodland, WA. 98674 (206) 225-9895 ccJohn Smith MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPT. OF HEALTH 8 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CCC 24 990 RECEIVED Tom Fink, Mayor 1Viun eipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services 825 "L" Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 December 14, 1990 Lance and Judith Nowland P.O. Box 1037 Woodland, Washington 98674 Re: Acceptance Of The Peat System On Lot 12B Delak's Addition, P.I.N. 020-111-41 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Nowland: This office at this time has given full approval to the innovative peat absorption field located on your lot. This is a result of recent samples taken from the sample port at the end of the peat mound absorption field. The samples indicated very low levels of contaminants being discharged to the ground. It is now possible for you to obtain Health Authority Approval from this office in the event you decide to sell the property. This information is being forwarded to the director of the Department of Health & Human Services to finalize the contract requirements. If you have any questions regarding the peat mound system, please feel free to call or write. Sincerely, John Smith, P.E., Manager On -Site Services Program MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPT. OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WN 2 9199.0 kECEIVED Dan Roth Municipality of Anchorage On Site Services, Department of Health P.O. Box 19-6650 Anchorage, ALaska 99519 Lance and Judith Nowland P.O. Box 1037 Woodland, WA. 98674 (206) 225-9895 May 23, 1990 Dear Dan Roth; I plan to be in Alaska in August to take care of our property in preparation for winter. Is that a good time to be there in relation to the peat mound repair or finalization? We would like to get this finalized so we can sell the property in future. What is the status of the peat mound systems for the municipality? will they be a choice that the general public will install in future? Please update me on the situation and let me know the most appropriate time to be in Alaska to be there when you do work on the project. Sincerely -1444444-01 Judith Nowland 70 Nv, kill/?7 t out D Yak L//rL W I7N THIS Cots -rr\ka_ f=ins) 'MAP — TAKE .S.dvi pt`let' Fen.. 2_ C ttECLd UtJ p5 Ce a$ frtF To po GotLuc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE MEMORANDUM May 22, 1990 John Smith, P.E., Manager, On -Site Services Program Daniel J. Roth, Civil Engineer, On -Site Service Recommendation For Innovative Peat System In Delak's Addition Lot 12B On May 21, 1990 I visited the subject site to take water monitor readings in both the water monitor tube and the secondary drainfield. The results were 4.2 feet and 4.5 feet from water level to ground surface respectively. To refresh your memory I also visited the site for purposes of ground water monitoring last October and this March and found the water table to be approximately the same. This is conclusive evidence that at this time the 'secondary' absorption area and the peat system absorption area are encroaching upon the ground water table. - Letters from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation dated July 10, 1989 gave official denials to the peat systems to discharge directly into groundwater or surface water sources until such time that adjustments could be made to lower the levels of contaminants being discharged from them. This office should not continue with the surface regrading of the peat system in Delak's Addition since this system has been given a denial to discharge directly into groundwater. An upgrade should take place immediately to install a'conventional septic system. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DATE: May 22, 1! TO: John Smitt FROM: Daniel J. SUBJECT: Recommend: Addition 1 On May 21, 1990 I visi readings in both the o drainfield. The resu] level to ground surfac also visited the site last October and this approximately the sam' time the 'secondary' . absorption area are ei Letters from the Alas: dated July 10, 1989 g, discharge directly in+ until such time that levels of contaminant: This office peat system a denial to should take system. should not in Delak': discharge place imm: MEMORANDUM PR — Qd'yL 002 ft2,614,--5 DjScusSJanis 1.6Aa4,:fcs srFcuabe- CcutINC. Feun44 Pt1oot4 rr Tar R.JaSimas (NDIUfE+ Tti+}r 71+E t&Nr 04toJMp is Tzeita to 7)IS cl-Frivemrp.Q.rd2 70 3,S01444 6 70 The Pi 9-1 a2, 771674 LETS Mae /4N63tt 70 Gdhrtr ribs v/n- 70 17;fc sys7Lw+, ti D tesilete Iter—men- MUNI COS75 . SF W8 CJAsW 4p/2tNtorc-, nab AO%[WNc. U((Z7 es AccUMAttlieO Ly ,4 Pisces -Ai meZ afflicH sNoIcAtsr -mAC Sy fiery/utt 7:16 sy67e», Dims Does Nur o.csree rrM-r TYE ft.rr M WIVP Wcl- QcwnNvE -:o Pgat, oe 4QSQLa te- orP.A —rr 'Mc As a = 706 DISG(M Nn6/L. stotx-D p.n.s° (t4DtC4-ab it-:.tr PHI -IS S77U.. aoNSe#o'er£ flier ps*r aur Cys -7041 7o Ss inrrwv.7naAs nrlo vstr out ispbaalAc. Do �� so Yefi 5X'snnut OW_. i g' Y IF rt -ac a pair T1Cva,mNu6 Wret The NO scnra Can( egA CONTMcT C.C., fat::an 1N0MATES 77t4r vhs Pow rytoo. D IS t, 'r'g.c*r'mC Tt2 r eFfc. r 'net Leis close our ThW canon- r) . rF -res TECT A feaNCvlS DIS eFe-u is 43e:tCt '17Lt=a9tED 171e74 WE' S/7ff,�ocW cta s e cgSfpclAnctt - l^ ct4 ,0te71 o/Fn iw ,a c tt ow, (�.L-'qJ�f . 2.. ,3 .:17,44. ""/ timy r you sf -o ser up .4 /Y1 asatyc, w (77-0 rlutocirr o Wfest Stiff CU-ut 4-actictlicedEr tK /tvcitspr . Tom Fink, Mayor ..C-..-e._,.;_.C_b_C J_ nas.rw'..�,u.,�criavanw�_r n Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services 825 "L" Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 April 10, 1990 Judith Nowland P.O. Box 1037 Woodland, Washington 98675 Subject: Lot 12B Delaks Addition Subdivision Peat Mound Wastewater Disposal System Dear Ms. Nowland: In response to your recent letter, please be advised that the contract to regrade a portion of your lot to divert surface water around the peat mound has been extended so that we can further monitor the system. In December 1989, some wastewater effluent was noted to be surfacing near the southwest corner of the peat mound towards the road. After spring break-up, this office will further investigate this problem and make a determination as to whether to proceed with the planned regrading around the peat mound. We will advise you as to the results of our inspection. Dan Roth is continuing to serve as the engineer for this project. If you have any questions, please write or call our office at 343-4744. Sincerely, h, Jn Smith, P.E. Program Manager, On-site Services cc: Daniel J. Roth, Civil Engineer, On-site Services Kids Are Our Future 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dan Roth On site systems Municipality of Anchorage Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 1/18/90 Dear Sirs; MUNICIPALny OF ANCHOi DEPT. OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 1F.E1 20 iggo RECEIVED What is the status of our "innovative sewage treatment system" in Birdcreek, Alaska? Since our 12/89 authorization to proceed with "remedial work" we haven*t heard from you. A phone call to' our renters and to Dan Kowal leaves us concerned with possible added unforeseen problems. Please addise us on your 1990 repair schedule and of problems that may exist. Sincerely, 1mweivs 4- ith Rowland E%, Tom Fink, Mayor Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services 825 "L" Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 October 19, 1989 Dan Kowal B.J. & T Construction 2953 Wentworth Street Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Re: Notice to Proceed for Installation of Fill Material Under Job Number P.O. 92982 Dear Mr. Kowal: This letter will serve as your notice to proceed on the above referenced job. The effective date of this notice to proceed is October 19, 1989. The date of final completion will be October 29, 1989. You will have ten calender days to complete the work. I will be the contact person and the inspector for final acceptance of all work. Please give this office 24 hours notice before work will begin. If you have any questions please contact me at 343-4744. Sincerely, C1PPW /Via— Daniel J. Roth Civil Engineer On -Site Services cc: John Smith, P.E., Manager On -Site Services Program Notice To Proceed Acknowledged By: Dan Kowal, Owner B.J. & T Construction /Pr"?' r, Date Tom Fink, Mayor Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services 825 "L" Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 October 2, 1989 Judith Nowland P.O. Boa 1037 Woodland, Washington 98674 Re: Proposed Landscaping on Lot 12-8 Delak's Addition Dear Mrs. Nowland: Pursuant to our telephone conversation on September 27, 1989, please be advised that the innovative peat wastewater disposal system located on the subject lot does require minor remedial work. This work consists of grading and placement of fill material adjacent to the system to ensure positive surface drainage away from the peat mound. This work is necessary to ensure that the system will operate in compliance with AMC 15.65, Wastewater Disposal Regulations. The tenants now living on your property may continue to park where presently parking. Once the fill material is in place, parking on it will not cause damage providing no plowing of the fill occurs. The only area parking cannot occur is on the peat mound. The site drainage plan and specifications for placement of the fill material are enclosed for your information and review. So that we may proceed with this necessary work please sign and date this authorization and return it to our office at your earliest convenience. If you have questions or concerns please contact me at 343-4744. S' cerely, lerce Daniel J. Roth Civil Engineer On -Site Services Program I authorize the Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health & Human Services to proceed with the remedial work specified by the site drainage plan and specifications. Juc�,ith Nowland Date n n DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH i HUMAN SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION REQUEST FOR QUOTES LANDSCAPING AROUND PEAT MOUND SEPTIC LEACHING FIELD INTRODUCTION The Municipality of Anchorage is soliciting quotes for furnishing and installing 35 tons of Type II fill material around an experimental septic system to divert surface water. This construction will be performed on Lot 12B Delak's Addition, in Bird Creek, Alaska. SCOPE OF WORK The contractor selected will furnish and install approximately 35 tons of Type II material. The Type II material shall meet the specifications of Type II material except that no material shall have a diameter greater that two(2) inches. It is intended that the material be placed and compacted adjacent to the septic system to ensure positive drainage away from the system. Bid Item 1 The unit price per ton in place for imported Type II material shall include labor, equipment, and materials required to furnish and place imported fill where directed on the accompanying drawing, by the engineer. The unit price shall include grading and contouring of existing material and the proper placement and grading of the imported material and mechanical compaction to 95 percent of maximum density. All construction shall be in accordance with Division 20.00 of M.A.S.S. and these special provisions. This item may vary in quantity, depending on the conditions encountered. The Municipality of Anchorage's Standard Specifications for streets - Drainage - Utilities - Parks, dated 1984 (M.A.S.S.), are hereby referenced, incorporated in and become a part of the contract documents for this work. IME OF COMPLETION Time of completion will be seven days after notice to proceed. • PO 73/8'5' oT nJs Po 7d/5'6 42. Pjzc, tc PO 7'1/5/ i9PV ,De 29826 /4.2407 Serf po r'2a6e ,a3 At 8 lL,Oau ter s/s9s3'= /0,03,4 So 700. — 7 /7 -el MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE 43-013 (Rev. ere» 1 PURCHASING COPY rem < A Z s ! s e O E .....b. -I 1 2 PURCHASING REQUISITION NO. 06647 IF CHANGE REF. P.O. I _ o m TOTAL ITEMS Q U :y y O Z y 1 certify that funds A IZED SIGNATUflE have been appropriated y�� 7r''//�� for this expenditure. X Gt U" "� ' >, o n -- �� \�� ..""••••, •--- ,•••••• i ., t • o - )- r -..)`.‘‘.i-f '21 ,4` - 1 l t ab �\ r 's Z. C n 4 r6 2 J �� 'a A eb '. = a I `j` T� - , O 4 STOCK NUMBER DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE 8 A . r - REQUISITION DATE y -7-k7 m JJ DEPARTMENT c2,00 h E4 ##c s NOT TO EXCEED v Y CONFIRMATION ORDER INFORMA AMOUNT f 0\ 0 ^' ♦-\ 3 � 13 'o C EFFECTIVE DATES � m m m OTHER (SPECIFY) DIVISION OR SECTION 5 no LIT - C—P;-i' NIP ORO 1 ACCOUNT 1 TASK I OPT ,1 COST CENTER ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION TO g oi • rS '''•-.0 8 m el < V. i 8 a =9 P 1 PAYMENT INFORMATION , OTHER (SPECIFY) CERTIFICATION DATE 8 1F, PER QUOTATION I DATE REQUIRED th PAY TO ATTN. OF FBID OR CONTRACT NO. c ti • € e m PROMISED DELIVERY DATE REQUESTED BY g y <$ g< y CO n v < 0 y oo_� 11O �' FIN; 1 N 8= 0 m0 a • Z c>rI3 Orn rn rn tines 0 • rle t —c h av3Havn0 L.1 lb r tiw v � M 0 0 O r -- w " -s-_1 Ib I I 1 1 y Iu? I bl f o- w 0 I •I; ti 'I 1 1 W:\''44 �� ("1 ‘.1 ir , _ c? TA- W C,c`0o c�oW 4. Ni .1.v1 3\ k. I 6 N �� "o tt 4 0 p C:;-1 O O 4\ e N - 'J •l„ % 1 L. \ V -11T� 11 .\ I I 0 '4 Dan Roth On Site Systems; Health Department P.O. Box 19-6650 Anchorage, AK. 99519-6650 September 22, 1989 Dan Roth; Judith Rowland P.O. Box 1037 Woodland, WA. 98674 (206) 225-9895 TAUMCIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPT. OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 5Fp271989 RECEIVED I need to know exactly what it is you propose to do on my property and why you need to do what it is you propose. It is my understanding at this point that the peat system on the Birdcreek Property does not drain or function properly. We have heard from you also that the tennants are parking on the wrong area of the land. They are parking where we told them it was okay and where we were told by crew members it was okay. Please draw me a plat map that shows me what areas of my property I can park on or utilize. Sincerely, Judith Rowland 2:)tiOih J-7 /k50/144 (jas'4 A7 pi, 4) ,mac ter, a cc's, n-. X' i-, L _ GSD ll 197 eaff cow �.,�C-� ogoG—aryth 111 MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE MEMORANDUM DATE: August 4, 1989 TO: Dan Roth FROM: John Smith 51M-u`r SUBJECT: Correction of Drainage Problems Adjacent to Peat Mound at Delak Please take the lead in taking care of the drainage problems around the peat system at Lot 128 Delak Addition. Dari Bolles is available to assist you. Things to consider are: 1. Written notification to property owner that additional on property work is necessary to ensure successful operation of his system. 2. Preparation of site drainage plan. Dan Bolles has prepared topo of existing elevations and has done some fill quantity talcs. 3. Preparation of specifications for furnishing and installing fill material. 4. Preparation of engineer's estimate for total cost. 5. Solicitation of quotes to complete work. 6. Preparation of short form contract and purchase requisition to award work to lowest bidder 7. Field inspection of work and final inspection of completed work. 8. Provide notification to property owner that site drainage must not be disturbed. Please have a preliminary drainage plan and draft specifications ready for my review by 8/10/89. Let's try to have a Notice to Proceed to a contractor by 8/31/89 and final completion by 9/7/89. cc: Dan Bolles �/ TO -,pf/H s ALASKA CflUIROflffleflTAL COf1TROL SCRUICCS, Inc. Engineering G Enuironmeniol Studies 1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B • Anchorage. Alaska 99503.4907) 561-5040 DATEa�`�t' a; y 1?r SUBJECT •� /a a /7r1.1, c it Stdac (4/S/er%r f 3/f/n, Az -7n `- oC p— 1 --Ae L. A4.t -474 Tom Fink, Mayor Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services 825 "L" Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 March 9, 1989 Leroy C. Reid, Jr., PhD, P.E. Alaska Environmental Control Services, Inc. 1412 West 33rd Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Subject: Permit Request for Innovative Peat Mound Absorption System, Lot 12B Delak's Subdivision Dear Dr. Reid: After review of the subject permit application by staff in the On -Site Services Program, the following comments were made: 1. The septic tank to well separation distance has a waiver on file performed February 13, 1988. Since the septic tank to our knowledge was not disturbed during the construction of the peat: mound absorption field, another waiver is not necessary. 2. Because the lift station is a new item to the overall septic system,an additional waiver will be written for the lift station. • 3. Contrary to the objection by the Archdiocese of Anchorage, the separation of the secondary absorption system to the lot line between the subject lot and Lot 5B will be waived to one(1) foot. Since the secondary absorption system has only six inches of gravel under the perforated pipe, no adverse impact should be placed on Lot 5B's ability for septic system upgrade as a result of this waiver approval. 4. A waiver of the distance from the secondary system to the well is not needed at this time. Since the dimensions and location of the secondary absorption system were documented during construction by Mr. Steve Morris and Mr. Dan Roth of D.H.H.S., this document will stand as correct unless further evidence can be admitted to disprove it. Leroy C. Reid, Jr., PhD, P.E. March 9, 1989 Page 2 S. The department requests that a proposal be written by you for taking steps to correct the surface drainage of the subject lot to divert water away from the absorption system. Accompanied with this proposal should be an estimate for cost of machinery and man-hours to complete the job. Upon receiving the requested material, the department will issue a permit for the experimental septic system. Sincerely, Gs/1 Al Sundquist, .E., Manager On -Site Services Program cc: Lee Browning, P.E., Manager Environmental Services Division Dan Roth, Civil Engineer On -Site Services Program n MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Environmental Health Division 825 "L" Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502, Telephone 264-4720 ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM AND/OR WELL INSPECTION REPORT Name L?nee Now bete DISTANCES Address 5,24 Coy eT 8f'o7, ANcxa<44F t9l qq t9O (�SL3 `7F3e/ IPermit No. No. of Bedrooms 3 FROM TO noTSEPTIC TANK q) - p WELL 7S T ABSORPTION t'rwrfIELD jet*, /CS 7s' WELL LEGAL 0 SCNIPTION 1.01 610C11 /Z Township. Range. Section Suod.be/2 /_. 4hi, '/,en LOT LINE 31 201 /' 7/DN Q/" S/o [(S 3.2r! TANKS FOUNDATION aY yr' &0 ^fi' AS -BUILT DIAGRAM lS ow bGhan of well. septic ritam, properly hoes, toundauon, do y at Odd M t ® SEPTIC Is (1 cL,fi ithilntn 0 HOLDING anulacturer Ale icePie enL Matanal S7LQe / 7' a' stc.ndpt , ars TYPE OF SYSTEM 0 TRENCH XI jBED 0 W. DRAIN 0 OTHER Deplete pipe bottom from original grade Fill added above original grade Gravel length Total absorption area FT 59- 3D ' FT NSD SO FT Number of Ines Sal riling 6 2/SD SOFT Inetailer 57-01T" MMA/Nle/sen Bret. cir PRIVATE Classification IAB.CI Total depth from original grade -t- 2 Gravel depth beneath pipe Zrt4. Gravel width FT FT /4' FT Distance between Ines .2' FT Pipe material F8 -/o tt s7n D.2o:Y Date Instal 4.r17 H-13 /PM? WELLS 0 OTHER (Identify) Total Depth FT Inalalar - Data lnsWlad: Cased to REMARKS: See 4NsIke/ here,-*. Sean', FT fiery Is 7"44tK7oe rn,7Y /$'r . ra.nnsr- ttntr reeau OI ' it'Ge,Sets, The_Arovnded arts Is In a 701,34--14 ow VC/ern inn . AHee A, a.,t,dta are FPal/v'FMtirru /Tr ba,rl. Joa.1 oroeLs teione "eke- 4 free L//fJ/>J 14e4 /ehette•) . ice -..e da lad e2/,7/S2E Reid ti /*Net T6' NolaI=n/ 6/r/tI/Rt. /If/e1IGr 4nAJtect, entwine, ata/rel 9J/G/tr Qev/ i sen nwAdecae dike/ flails" arr AoLyd ylerf-rta/e,l e1a,4d .o�/r%�Id farrt/o tc4 d "i 1.4,1 ht/re.e ,ILsf14 if sys/e -, 4 Scale: Inspections Performed: Mnn2, A, tee gel Date /o/.to//ree /J III Sri asFthassusersailierimilmi•seacilmtkuil N if( Municipal and SIAe puldelinp N idled on this Se Nit ver$ ',la/ Cetnp/ranee . Health Department Approval- Date- laKiten n Ver.A1Al )e{,ere ENGINEERS SEAL 72-013 (3/85) • ALASKA CII NIROnfll611TAL COfTROL SERu CES, InC. Engineering & Enuironmental Studies MUNIC'PAL TY OF ANCHORAGE ENVIRuNMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION October 20, 1988 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health & Human Service 825 L Street Anchorage, AK 99501 ATTN: Lee Browning RE: Lot 12B, Delak's Addition Dear Mr. Browning: OCT 21 1983 RECEIVED The collection of information on this peat system has been completed. The data used in developing this report is from physical measurements; soils logs; review of Joan Brooks' report; review of Municipality of Anchorage drawings; and interviews with Mary Frohne, Bub Neilsen (the excavator). Steve Morris and Dan Roth of the Municipality of Anchorage, and Lance Nowland, the owner. Attached is the as -built drawing for the peat mound absorption system for this lot. The existing septic tank and the new lift station is within 100 feet of the well. A waiver for the septic tank was requested in 1987. On May 12, 1987, the integrity of the septic tank was determined. There was a grey water system which was not connected into the septic tank. This was later hooked up by interior replumbing. See attached letter. A 500 gallon tank/lift station was installed on July 11-13, 1987. It was at a distance of 88 feet from the well. The peat mound meets all requirements of the ordinance except part of the peat cover extends into the 20 feet patent road reservation. I would doubt seriously if this road will ever be widened into the full 50 feet wide right of way. It deadends into a cul-de-sac on the adjacent lots to the north east. The soil absorption part of the peat system extends very close to the lot line with lot 5B. There is a well on Lot 5B at a distance of 110 feet from the lot line. The system serving the occupied house on this lot runs to the northeast. It would be difficult to ever install a system within this 10 foot strip. I have contacted the Archdiocese of Anchorage for the non -objection to a waiver. A copy of the letter of objection Is attached. The soils in the area of the secondary seepage area are reported to be clean sands. The excavator also reports that the closer the lot line the better the soils. The monitor tube, closest the house, Is in layered clean sand and silt. The system is reported to be parallel the lot line by Brooks, Nowland and Nielsen. The ground disturbance confirms this position. 1200 West 33rd Auenue, Suite 13 • Anchorage, Alaska 99503 • (907) 276-1361 n The existing secondary system has an area of 490 square feet. The soil absorption system for a three bedroom house on a coarse sand with 125 square feet per bedroom would normally require 563 square feet. An adequacy test was performed on the system on October 14, 1988. Two thousand gallons of water were dumped into the system with 25 minutes. The static water level in the field rose 2.2 feet. The rate of fall was measured in 10 minute intervals for 50 minutes. During this time 1100 gallons was absorbed as the level dropped 1.2 feet. The system, as it now exists, Is more than adequate for a 3 bedroom house. A graph of the results is attached. About 60 square feet of the system is within the 100 foot well radius. There are nearly impermeable soils toward the house. The water drainage appears to be away from the well. About the time the system started up. the nitrate in the well was 1.0 mg/L. In June 1988, the nitrate level was 0.4 mg/L. Bacteriological tests of the well water showed no coliform bacteria. This shows no apparent effect of the system on the water quality of the well. There is a need for better drainage on this lot. The way the system is installed there is a low spot which traps surface water by the absorption system. The test hole was dry to -7.5 BGL in late July. There were times when there was 1 inch of water over this area and the water level in the standpipe was 1-2 feet BGL. While the adequacy test was being performed some lot elevations were determined. The top of the cleanout pipe for the dralnfleld was set at elevation 100 feet. The bottom of the drainage way between the bed and the secondary field is 2.6 feet above the invert of the outlet pipe. A piece of 2' x 4' x 2" insulation should be placed over the pipe at about 1 foot below the bottom of the ditch. This would protect/the pipe ;while allowing the drainage ditch to be deepened by several inches. With selective filling with soil, the drainage problems would be eliminated. If 4-5 cubic yards of relatively inpermeable soils (F3 -F4) were spread over the field In a thin layer it would help improve surface drainage. From the information obtained, it appears that the system as installed has some variances from the requirements of the Municipality of Anchorage Code. In my professional opinion, a waiver of these requirements will not create a health hazard. With care, the system should function well as a wastwater treatment and disposal system. It is requested that the following is approved: 1. The septic tank's distance to the well be waived to 75 feet. /1L RFS "td/ 2. The lift station's distance to the well be waived to 88 fee 3. The secondary soil absorption system serving the bed be approved to lie within one foot of the 58 lot line. j7vrn(, 4. A waiver of the distance from the secondary system to the well be Aro MEM' granted to 95 feet. 5. The drainage should be improved to ensure a long lived system. 6. The system is a valid on-site wastewater treatment and disposal system. Please issue a permit number for this system. If you have any questions please let me know. ,40,11.11.74 ' O . • •r e aero. J ` • �'•.• CE -2251 Attachments LCR/sr Sincerely, Leroy C. Reid, Jr., PhD, P.E. President iOT /ZE Dada. 1.< ADD 17-1 on./ S/7 PEN i /VIO✓Nl) CYST. *l /00' GOO NO, MON✓Al r CO one 0) R E.aa l ENc.N K Go' Atli" AJ T✓BH Nb mew P A PP' foo' e-- I VMt RZRAIA PERM€TCR 1 "oma DRA•/N RocK } /s'X_o' I 11 .g)CrEovT or �caer /" 20/ SEP, -/C. TA At IC N M o cies/ 0 C00 PNGi/ TANK LIFT srAT/ oat ay S. nAoaRr. , D' Par Ai e-4.-st - LoT IZC OE_f+K .A Ire .S/. • •' • P -CN i MOJN /) £Y -^-.7s .. T 1 � /00' \1 0TeaP./ 51 - O NN p, R83a 2 - -�-- - - - - '-�-_ - - -o t.1[ GP/ cal ©Y ,� nn o_ r N; ..171 ' /(� . •Suw+P co .% IT -0 2 TJaE 4 •••7 \ 1 t_ \ 1001 '. 1 J Lim :VI R tRA"4 N - 4..0~ Mo On/ r'co 6rt_ P N%ij rNK LsGT CA- r0�.( 3Y •S• Aol IC O• ao7W 8- tio- 9 12. 1 1 N N. m- C= ' #F. 'GT, 1•••• La %M 4 s_T_-.:1% 0..1:1!071 c ` ' D 6412 IMMEIBE —17 teivii ®EM W --- :r®®MERST =1 g®�== -_t _ �-'® eg utal;ii-- =Y---YIi.��2 -_ SiO=LIMpli� WItlImM prym.�oo.. MINNY1wm.tl�Y MOM 211111•111MINIMIENEMMINEI _-• , mmlummsAfl __ a� 11un.Ws0lu�n_• liter Arlimin"i �I i ..n nnlm®1aa,vmmnml�lnaw0®® 1 1 1 I I ®YY� 1 I I -Er ___...a=== --Mae, S-- ®�® I III ®SINpa gf nIMM MOR RIMS oo=sY�\ r— =..��a gE0 LTME= YY r— Earl= Y� . I _ _. arr�=S—fl wI i S mis 5--S fa cru••W — m= a.—i—ai====��G__w.w =Ira= _ ______e__ _-5 —� Ewe _A.��— �tl�O��rYtq■AnhllhI Nn.tl�tl tltllan.�p ECM u..a sNElw n m..tnn. ..Ss.... ll.,15 smdum.Inn■®t... Mi mraira....tl Im11nYtl0♦��.... - ...�� ids mtl.tl.we.�5 == ��m.tl....v....1 s® !mum etno�l®smsl.s.somet mono■ ��llml mp �IgQOUIgIQ�em�� Inn ofnlm�. marmuumum YIDaIIlnm IIIIMM ®mua 0MMIIllmltltlI® IMI IImmmMmmnn 1 1 ane mmunmam 1 in aIm Nnlnnmm�una�W EM 1 n.' 1m=1a®aim111111 BariMEMMIZEBENIEMr 1-EIMIUMINMSZIEMEINIESEEMEINIM MUM ®E . —_=ME-_ =;=- E=IN ZG-. _ RIEMMIMMIM ._ ingarEMEM = MSM= IIMMEN =Eii -`-=w=...-6...=... YY =__�11_= = YIYSUn ets--S Y= ii=Yr room AeBllO�wnnrrl�p �mtl.� �.... m. d_.tlWOY W p��11Els Rpl�qqp�® nmaiadim....... i I .s• ‘44 I I EMI allellall 1 - I 1 1 ti O� CO I� 10 Y1 a .4 N vL } 0 -'0 -1 4C, CO CO Il. b gi 1 1 • -N � n apchbiocese of anchonaQe 225 Coaaova Stacet • anchonacc, Alaska 99501 • 907/258-7898 September 29, 1988 Mr. Leroy C. Reid, Jr., President Alaska Environmental Control Services 1412 West 33rd Avenue Anchorage, AK 99503 Re: Lot 5B & 12B, Delak's Addition Dear Mr. Reid: Pursuant to your letter of September 16, 1988, we have reviewed your request to issue a non -objection statement relative to the sewer system being installed too close to our property. After considering your request and discussing it with Municipal staff, we are not in favor and object to the system being installed or operated con- trary to State and Municipal regulations, standards and guidelines. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this subject. Sincerel , Michael J. Meehan Director of Planning r1 n ALASKA enUIROnmenTAL CONTROL SERUICCS, InC. Engineering & enuironmental Studies September 18, 1988 Archdiocese of Anchorage 225 Cordova Anchorage. AK 99501 ATT\: Mike Meehan RE: Lot 5B, Delak's Addition Dear Mr. Meehan: The Municipality of Anchorage has asked that I review an experimental sewer system that was installed on lot 12 B. Delak's Addition. This is the job we discussed earlier today. Part of the system encroaches on the 10 feet separation distance to the lot line. The attached sketch shows the location of the system. The part of the system closest to the well on lot 56 is 110 feet from the well. The sewer system on lot 58 supposedly runs in the north easterly direction behind the newer house. It would be highly unlikely that a sewer upgrade for lot 58 would be near the lot 12B system because of the well location. There is an older vacant log house on the northwest part of lot 5B and a newer, occupied building on the northeast part of the lot. The MOA records show a single family dwelling for this property. Is this correct? If you have no opbjectlons I would appreciate a statement of non -objection to the sewer system being within 10 feet of the lot line. Below is an example of such a statement: Date: I. , state that there is no objection to the Municipality .of Anchorage granting a waiver of the 10 feet setback distance between the sewer system and the lot line for Lot 12B Delak's Addition. Signature: If you have any questions please let me know. Sincerely, 1200 West 33rd Avenue. Suitt 13 • Anchorage. Alaska 99503 • (907) 561.5040 a M SITE: Alaska Pacific University 4101 University Drive • Anchorage, Aloka 99508.1672 • PEAT MOUND STUDY • CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS (Rb e../2b-et. (907) 561.1266 TITRE: 9 Sat DATE: SE77T/D SB _ • Sample Source 1 PARAMETER Septic ' Peat Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water _Tank .TEMPERATURE /D o So 50 DISSOLVED OXYGEN z3" Pi — pH -7fcd t.Z Cp,Ri 6. c eTEMPERATURE PROBES • °J GC.. Above Pipes (1) V Below Pipes (2) • / 3' 1' Below Pipes (3) / Z- ° Base of Mound (4) ii Lift Station Meters • � Duration 5-0•7 A a. _ Cycles OQO/.66 B0D5 (mg/1) fro/ I 17 S BODm mg/1 COD mg/1 L // 4 o 3 q — Pt,: 'TSS mg/1 5-2. 2 3 "'9' TRN mg/1 • ata 3.1 150 NITRATE mg/1 tdud)�,`� o?/e2 D.8' T. PHOS mg/1 j'J' a1.O .t - rN3 - COLOR cu tt.o�'( t /0 V / 20 TURBIDITY stu_ 3 3 z S /•y CONDUCTIVITY (NMC1qq//11 ) `f 6O `+? ro 07.4t:}5P TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml 35->( lc? < ( L FECAL COLIBORM No./100 ml Z)0041 { 1 t Gi t. arta 17. 1.1.4.4141.X w M E cc 0 �e�l 7.1 n n iso sn� 8•S,i_ Alaska Pacific University rn0 Pr y- �,yg 4101 Univenitr Drive • Anchorite, Ah.k■ 99508-4672 (9071561.12266 PEAT MOUND STUDY Q� CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS JJ SITE: I21) CREfiL TIME: O8S0 DATE: 8-6-88 COMMENTS• Samples Source I PARAMETER Septic Tank Peat Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE `l /1 c 7 DISSOLVED OXYGEN • O fN 6 fit? pH ;.,.5/ 4'.i 6.3 TEMPERATURE PROBES A)Q, /r •' • Above Pipes (1) 17o Below Pipes (2) A ill 1' Below Pipes (3) /70 Base of Mound (4) /pe Lift Station Meters / Duration L'- :: ><C::: Cycles / BOD5 (mg/1) / qb BODm mg/1 / ( • COD mg/1 '900 Yr - 4 TSS mg/1 3? 99 TRW mg/1 S6 3.7 816 NITRATE m 1 0•,- 0• f 0 7•S�O. 3 r T. PHOS mg/1 ; ? , "P-9" . Z 4 ,spigirp . COLOR cu 400 3 98 —' TURBIDITY stu /0 62 it /1 CONDUCTIVITY (1261) 300 yQQ f0 TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml 1y662S !•4.1 1 FECAL COLIFORM 140./100 ml 59,k003 CI <' COMMENTS• Alaska Pacific University 4101 University Drive • Anchorage, Aluk■ 99508-1672 1907)561.1:66 "ftm . PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEK S SITE:54104:1"�BACTERT IME: ICAL O DATE: . 0 H c. LABORATORY PARAMETER Sample Source I Septic ' Tank Peat Mound Well Water Dit • Wat TEMPERATURE IF DISSOLVED OXYGEN 33 pH r;,/ (•q TEMPERATURE PROBES: /7 Above Pipes (1) 2 I Below Pipes (2) r 3 4 1' Below Pipes (3) / 0 Base of Mound (4) % 0y Lift Station Meters: ........‘„ Duration 14411 44IIIIIII Cycles Dime 041 BODS (mg/1) rrr�� r BODm mg/1 COD mg/1 s q3 TSS mg/1 lrq/0 TEN mg/1.. 70 y6 Z, sq- NITRATE mg/1 /4 ,O. j Sa 5` c : T. PHOS mg/1 %ef 4 X .L • �1, COLOR cu 0 / 0 r TURBIDITY stu ay : B � CONDUCTIVITY (Nl/1/1) ,f)-0 600 TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml j42,700 e COMMENTS. 0 M a Alaska Pacific University 4101 University Drive • Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4672 19071 561.1:66 PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS % SITE: 14 (/2-424 TIME: Oi DATE: PARAMETER Sample Source Septic Tnnk Peat Mound • Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE 9 8 8 DISSOLVED OXYGEN 0 11.3 9 pH a 7.0 G' %.7 ,' . TEMPERATURE PROBES 16 Above Pipes (1) le Below Pipes (2) la 1' Below Pipes (3) Base of Mound (4) 6 Lift Station Meters , Duration DO OOO 4D Cycles 43.0 / BOD5 (mg/1) 2.0crrr�� BODm mg/1 COD mg/1 4 0 ZS TSS mg/1 S`7 / c_ " TKN mg/1 77 '%IS 3.5 NITRATE mg/1 .3 4#*. V. 13 T. PHOS mg/1 -:...5 I.is} ,10 _215 ,C`b Q ,�8 COLOR cu 1'01 9 1 1,* go 4/ 1414/ ' / Z a i TURBIDITY stu 'CONDUCTIVITY Ala) 1/5 30 ..5-0 TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 mi co X JOS 1 { / FECAL COLIPORM No./100 ml 121 X ICS '( 1 'c I COMMRNTs. I11On1 0 • w a r Alaska Pacific University 4101 university Drive • Anchorage. Alaska 99508-4672 (9075 56 PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS SITE: "--01Rb 0.2Eek TIME: /D00 DATE: Jam. -Af PARAMETER Sample Source Septic Tank Peat Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE DISSOLVED OXYGEN pH TEMPERATURE PROSES Q,, 1a' Above Pipes (1) Below Pipes (2) 1' Below Pipes (3) Base of Mound (4) Lift Station Meters Duration 9'799i -6'r Cycles BODS (mg/1) BODm mg/1 .( Z c16/ y/./ a tf°G 1,01 %e� 1.38 COD mg/1 3- 0 TSS mg/1 1 a TEN mg/1 NITRATE mg T. PHOS mg/1 ND i3J w .is J;Oo 13 1 COLOR cu ire (a0 (D TURBIDITY stu 4f 3s CONDUCTIVITY (WI) 3S0 .2 3'a TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml Ho xios 30 <f FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml 17Xlog <1 .QMMEIITS , wele'vfer tee/ a.. c w N 0 s n Alaska Pacific University 4101 Univeniry Drive • Anchorage. Alaska 99508-4672 (907)561.1266 PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS SITE: 131rd Crr[,t TIME: 0re- e r DATE: / " is •r • Sassyde eeerey4 a :a/d hoar h - oJ.-; , b4 Stec c hK. Sample Source PARAMETER Septic Tank Peat • Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE 3 V l —/ (1 J DISSOLVED OXYGEN 0,9 S,/ pH 51 Ond; TEMPERATURE PROBES Above Pipes (1) ' Below Pipes (2) .'r )K::I 1' Below Pipes (3) •-Base of Mound (4) I Lift Station Meters Duration 37 / Cycles 8'6 7 ' BOD5 . (mg/1) 17 Z $ Y BODm mg/1 COD mg/1 q. 3V6 J I4 1 TSS mg/1 15. /3. TKN mg/1 NITRATE mg/1 .6 /9 T. PHOS mg/1 ':5 T. 125 .03 COLOR cu 46J0 75 TURBIDITY stu _(% 11 //11 CONDUCTIVITY (NaCl) ;Oo Zi d TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml ) 7 )( lob / os -o 120 '— FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml 1X10[.4/ ''�.1 . 8 .I C0MMFTS: Welt: 'gni 4r WI fl MJ►I(,i tga • J`'�iscc u71 Am reed bnr of "kin! Sassyde eeerey4 a :a/d hoar h - oJ.-; , b4 Stec c hK. 0 F 0 n Alaska Pacific University 4101 Umvenny Dnve • Anchorage. Alaska 99508-4612 1901 561.1:6# PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS SITE: . f r:• '\ (. !. J• ( TIME: ' "G..tr DATE: 7— /7 •PARAMETER Sample Source I Septic Tank Peat Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE 2 / is' _stil DISSOLVED OXYGEN �- -. pH •70 C.y c.f /e) Ij� TEMPERATURE PROBES A4. —V Above Pipes (1) p Below Pipes (2)2- 1' Below Pipes (3) 2.4 Base of Mound (4) Lift Station Meters •�3 ` /+ Duration ..-7‘6 - Cycles zr g -s y BODS (mg/1) /3 8' 2 BODm mg/1 —� COD mg/1 3e2 `�qj'p� '7, • TSS mg/1 a' S.- re/ etr"• TKN mg/1. l{, L NITRATE mg/1 1.7 .S/.O 1.9 • T. PHOS mg/1 ICI41,14 .19 itle COLOR cu sirs' A o TURBIDITY stu 91/ S'3 /I..17 CONDUCTIVITY (M i) Sat) /`JVD y, TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml Aft/ o? O p FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml at.v/0 V 'L • 0 COMMrnTS s�i c.L e w r�iLt __✓4� i chit f .4irz.. 7.Cl (7 VCT L 1. s. LABORATORY (a) Ala:1.a Pacific University �I1`I l'nnn•nv Drove • Anchorage, Alaska 9•5O8-161: 190:1 i61.: • PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS SITE: $Itb CeEEK TIME: DATE: Z-13-88 � 1 PARAMETER Sample Source 1 Septic Sank Peat Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE y' C, 346C 76C— aCDISSOLVED DISSOLVEDOXYGEN O /.77 pH ' 78 7.3 8.8 TEMPERATURE PROBES A...1., o C Above Pipes (,Y) ('i) O' C. Below Pipes (21 (3) ,r G 1' Below Pipes (21 (2) 3. C Base of Mound (A') 0) «s Cr Lift Station Meters Duration 3.3.8 he; Cycles `/9y9 788 BOD5 (mg/1). 7.0Z r rZ BODm mg/1 COD mg/1 5 20 Z• TSS mg/1 /0 5 7• .TKN mg/1 S8.0 6.0 '1.8 • NITRATE mg/1 mo3_pj /3.0 //.8 1.0 T. PHOS mg/1 /,1'! 0. ( — . COLOR cu 1/S0 350 30 TURBIDITY stuqq//II 66 57 8 CONDUCTIVITY (WI) /075 /000 /'/O TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml // x.105 T'NIT C_ < 1 FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml /.O Xlos < 1 < N 0 E 0 (Th ..ca Pacific University 4 IJ: 1 •. ••.cs Prnr• • An. homer, Alaska 4w5OS.44: r'1 IOC7i;41•I:'# PEAT MOUND STUDY CREMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS SITE: B3)er, Ce'FEK TIME: DATE: 1-16-88 PARAMETER Sample Source Septic Sank Peat Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE 7 c G / D C DISSOLVED OXYGEN / /y PH •7.7• 6.5 TEMPERATURE PROBES 44. -.5°c Above Pipes 04 (q) • O• Below Pipes C21 (3) 3' 1' Below Pipes (37(z' '/' Base of Mound (•4') (/l 5 Lift Station Meters /.4 Duration 9,7 Cycles 999 9 • 7`/2- . SODS (mg/1) /// . 2_ BODm mg/1 (, 9 • COD mg/1 .390 Z 5 TSS mg/1 83 Z 5 TKN mg/1 75 S. o • NITRATE mg/1 nju3- N11 /7 /7 T. PHOS mg/1 2 .3 0.2._ COLOR cu 4/30 /60 • TURBIDITY stu 0 Z/• CONDUCTIVITY (NaCq/I) 9 70 %So TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 mi. 3k/OS <1 FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml '32X/03 < COMMFNTc- n �`" ' AL.:, •:a Pacific University i 0 a N 5i. N 0 0 a a SITE: al'l I.• • hnce • An. honer. Ala.ka W5Q3•467: 19i71 5^:.::A• PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS tIkb l•_i.EEK TIME: //'00 Awl DATE: /Z -I9-37 .60 G+LT.t. C1u-' 1 Sample Source 1 PARAMETER Septic Tank Peat Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE -3.5• • 7.:V DISSOLVED OXYGEN 0 3.09 pH • 8.to 6.9 8 TEMPERATURE PROBES Above Pipes (1) O. Below Pipes (2) 3. 1' Below Pipes (3) 5' Base of Mound (4) !(o ' , Lift Station Meters Duration 7• y cycles 99 9 S 685 BODS (mg/1) . 17 8 3 BODm mg/1 O z. COD mg/1 44 90 -5 TSS mg/1 IVali' 1 Sys Z.F8 TKN mg/1 72. 6.5 3.'1 U T&A E mg/1 NO3-0 /.75 41. 5 vr5 T. P1105 mg/1 E"y4 2.0 0.&,7 0.( COLOR cu 3415 /coo o TURBIDITY stuqq//11 t!, ,.55 /38 1 CONDUCTIVITY (14261) / 0 50 /10 0 /Z.0 TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml j X107 /a Xlel < FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml ? Y < ( COMMENTS! SO4..4ic ?2cai CofiA-ori1S c I+O /rot344 en F+( , .60 G+LT.t. C1u-' 1 0 a w 0 0 0 SITE: Alaska Pacific University 4101 Univeniry Drive • Anchorage. Alaska 99508.4672 19071 561.1266 PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS �Ik'D CREEK TIME: /0:30 Ant DATE: /1-28-87 • PARAMETER Samples Source Septic. Tank Peat Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE 2/ 256 DISSOLVED OXYGEN o z.3 pH 9 6.7 TEMPERATURE PROBES Above Pipes (1) 0. Below Pipes (2) 9` 1' Below Pipes (3) G • Base of Mound (4) / 7. Lift Station Meters Y Duration 6.7 :::))` • Cycles i19i i 6 S7- ,/ BOD5 (mg/1) 97 y c.cs.� •_ BODm mg/1 7 day i b 116p 21.L4) 'U p,h•51-- N.G 1 COD mg/1 41 Z5 91/ TSS mg/1 a9 751 TKN mg/1 69 $.8 # kTE-mg/1 NO3-4 i.? z$ T. PHOS mg/1 PO.,/ /. L17 .0 / COLOR cu • 310 375 TURBIDITY stu//11 5 7 77 CONDUCTIVITY (N C1) 560 575 TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml 8.o.c106 4 O 56 FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml 5.Ox105 —J r�^ COMMFNTS• roas., i.+ Sep+iC loath. 6,¢4� SIDUnc/ eV?e.lu— _ 111.54 j. .ke. sr !+/�.14y , 1 0 a N u. >e 0 0 0 0 r^ AI. •:.a Pacific University Ili I 1 . n -v 1M ni • An. LPeaee. Ala.la'.IklY..InT: SITE: Bleb 0070V14:141 PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOI.OGIC.IL TESTS eaK Tl'IE: C900 DATE: /0/21/P7 PARAMETER Sample• Source Septic Tank Peat Mound Well Water Ditch ' Water TEMPERATURE C 7 7 DISSOLVED OXYGEN 0 7./ • pH : 7.3 6.5 TEMPERATURE PROBES Above Pipes (1) 3 Below Pipes (2) 7 1' Below Pipes (3) 7 Base of Mound (4) r J" Lift Station Meters _/..- Duration Duration 3.1 Cycles 58o I / BODS (mg/1) SODm mg/1 So Z COD mg/1 TSS mg/1 1 75 17 TKN mg/1 32_ 5.7 . NITRATE mg/1 x.)03-0 0.7 AM T. PHOS mg/1 O.y .05 COLOR cu Co O 3o TURBIDITY stuq 15 23.5 (NQ 11 CONDUCTIVITY C1) 2 -So X80 TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml '.i . <1 ISS)Wirtarii_: krts".' Cl."1"5 cot S Noel rc9 acliih1.. Lap . 0 .4 w N W 1' 0 ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSIT. PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS SITE:BIkt CREEI< TIME: 0900 DATE: /0h7b37 PARAMETER Sample Source Septic Taa3Jc Peat Mound Well Water Ditch Water TEMPERATURE c+° G 5 3 S na7E r lAbmuts DISSOLVED OXYGEN O 5.7 7 p" 8.9 7.z. 7.3 6-9 TEMPERATURE PROBES Above Pipes (1) Below Pipes (2) 1' Below Pipes (3) Base of Mound (4) 1 • Lift Station Meters Duration z./ >C cycles 541 . BODS (mg/1) Hog 7 30°'!// BODm mg/1 COD mg/1 2. z5 tl6 TSS mg/1 '14 f(09/ a 30��/ TKN mg/1 74 (2T) /0 NITRATE mg/1 /. z 2. 1.S T. PHOS mg/1 2 .6 . 17 0 . COLOR cu 215 So /O TURBIDITY /btu yt • 5 /Z 7 Z . ti CONDUCTIVITY (NMC1) 570 390 419 TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml TN T �, (0 .FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml <1 20 [o/.J/oem/ COMMENTS: 0 a N 0 0 0 0 ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY PEAT MOUND STUDY CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS SITE:T3IRb CREEK TIME: /100 DATE: /o j -/ g7 7 PARAMETER Sample Source Tank Tank Peat Mound Well Water Ditch Water TEMPERATURE C' 8 7 STATE S,Tfiumrws DISSOLVED OXYGEN ►.ij/,Q O /. G z pH 7.9 7`i G"9 TEMPERATURE PROBES Above Pipes (1) Below Pipes (2) 1' Below Pipes (3) Base of Mound (4) Lift Station Meters Duration /,/ Cycles 77?S2.y \ BODS (mg/1) 19 5 Z 30 M9// BODm mg/1 13 I ( 9 COD mg/1 32.9 75 ��-s. TSS mg/1 17 7 .36154 . r= ' K30 m9If TKN mg/1 96 3 NITRATE mg/1 a.5 h8�g 4 /0 T. PHOS mg/1 /.4/1/ O .8 O COLOR cu /55 /3o TURBIDITY stu 3 7 33.5 q CONDUCTIVITY (Na 1 l) 450 /000 TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml (o,$%/os TNTC/C FECAL COLIFORM No./100 ml s /.2x0 p•^,, ti -3‘1":1L. 4oto/. 1 hoo,./ COMMENTS! AINsNCs BIRD CREEK 10-3-87 10-17-87 10-24-87 11-28-87 12-19-87 PARAMETER State Standards Tank/Mound Tank/Mound Tank/Mound Tank/Mound Tank/Mound PN 6-9 7.9/7.4 8.9/7.2 7.3/6.5 9/2.3 8.6/6.9 BOD5 Img/1) 30 max. 195 / 2 164 / 7 - / - 97 / 4 145 / 298 TSS (mg/I) 30 max. 199 / 36.5 46 / 691 175 / 17 89 / 751 145 / 298 NITRATE (mg/11 10 max. 2.5 / 18.0 1.2 / 12.2 0.7 / 4.4 1.9 / 28 1.75 / 4.5 MN (mg!1) - 96 / 3 76 / 4 32 / 5.7 69 / 8.8 72 / 6.3 FECAL COLIFORM No./100 m1 20 max. 1.2X10(5)/136 4.0X10(5)/12 - / (1 5.0X18(5)/2 (1 / 4 TOTAL COLIFORM No./100 ml 6.8X10(5)/TNTC TNTC / TNTC - / - 8.0X10(6)/1056 1X10171/TNTC BODm (mg/1) - 131 / 19 - / - - / - - / - - / _ COD (mg/11 - 325 / 75 225 / 46 - / - 425 / 94 490 / 5 COLOR cu - 155 / 130 215 / 50 60 / 30 410 / 375 345 / 1000 TURBIDITY stu - 37 / 33.5 41.5 / 27 15 / 23.5 57 / 99 66.5 / 138 A FIELD REPORT ON THE INSTALLATION OF TWO PEAT SYSTEMS IN ALASKA by Joan L. Brooks (Research Associate, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469 phone (207) 581-2182 BACKGROUND At the request of Jewel Jones, Commissioner of Health and Social Services, Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska, I agreed to supervise the installation of two peat systems for on-site treatment of septic tank effluent. Ms. Jones, in a conference call, said that Mary Frohne would be her representative and that Mary would be the person I would have direct contact with on all aspects of the project. In conversations and a letter to Mary I requested the following: 1) sites were to be evaluated, soils mapped, and all permits approved, and copies sent to me prior to my departure for Anchorage; 2) a licensed engineer would review, sign and seal my suggested design work; 3) adequate time be provided to meet with the excavator or contractor and the licensing agency personnal prior to the beginning of construction; 4) and that I be provided with a sample of the peat to be used in the systems at least a month prior to my departure for Alaska (this sample was to be shipped overnight in a chilled and insulated container to enable me to evaluate the microbial population in the peat). I also suggested that I should give a seminar to the engineering community on my research and nine years of experience with peat systems. Mary Frohne assured me that there was no problem with any of my requests and that they would be met. In return for my consultation on the peat systems and a brief report on suggested testing and possible future research I would receive a consulting fee and have all expenses paid. A signed contract was to be in my hands prior to my departure from Maine and the fee would be given to me after the peat systems were in place and prior to my departure from Alaska. Mary asked if I would be willing to stay at her home instead of a hotel in order to keep the costs of the project as low as possible. In return, Mary said she would see that I had the opportunity to see some of the sights in Alaska at no expense to myself, if I could stay for a week or two after the peat systems were installed. After a number of calls from Mary it became clear to me that there were conflicting opinions in Anchorage about the proposed project. The contract was delayed and I would receive it when I reached Anchorage. At the time of this writing I still have not received a contract, nor have I ever seen any of the paperwork normally required for installation of an experimental on-site wastewater treatment system. I did receive a sample of the peat to be used in tC systems and determined itfielas mainly reed -sedge peat and not sphagnum peat as I have used in the past. I was not able to run certain microbiological tests because the sample was not refigerated during its extended time in transit. After examining the peat samples I notified Mary that certain levels in the peat deposit appeared useable in the peat systems if prepared properly and explained what was needed as to texture and moisture content. SITE EXAMINATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE PEAT SYSTEMS Upon my arrival in Anchorage I was met by Mary at the airport and taken directly to the office of Lee Reid whom I was given to understand has done the preliminary work on the sites selected for the project. We had a brief discussion on the sites but I must admit I was not at my best due to the 13 hour flight and the time change. On Thursday morning Mary introduced me to the Nielsen Brothers who would be doing the excavation and actual construction of the systems. We then went to the field to view both sites. The one site is located at Rabbit Creek Heights and the other at Bird. When we reached each site Mary told me where she felt the system should be located on the property. I was not shown any paperwork on property lines, distances to wells, elevations, etc. Mary.told me what these parameters were and asked how I wanted to design the systems. After viewing the two sites Mary took me to see the site where the peat was being excavated. This was the location of a subdivision which is now under the control of six banks. One of the bankers, Dean Cooke of the United Bank of Alaska, met us at the site for discussion about the peat and its suitability for this project. Bub Nelson of Nielsen Brothers was excavating peat for project use. I showed Bub how to recognize the type of peat which I feel will work best here. I also pointed out what material to avoid using in any future systems. On Thursday evening I gave a seminar to a number of engineers from private and regulatory sectors, the homeowners of one of the test sites, and several others, on my experiences with peat systems. A number of good questions were raised by the audience following my presentation. However, these same questions indicated there was a strong difference of opinion as to how this project was being handled, or should have been handled. I tried to make it clear that I am an impartial outsider in this issue and was only here to share what expertise I have concerning past experiences with peat systems. Rabbit Creek Heights- Some peat was on site and had been prepared by breaking up the clumps, spreading and drying the wet peat, and removing the larger roots, and woody materials. This peat was stacked to the rear of the proposed peat field area in a windrow. A pile of broken brick, crushed block and broken bags of cement which had hardened was stockpiled at the site to be usecor the layer of sand requ.ad underneath the peat in the system. There was also a stockpile of peat which had not been prepared as above but it could be used for the surround. This site is located directly on peat, between the right side of the house and a gravel road. On the far side of the road is a ditch which is classified as a stream. This road intersects with the road which runs in front of the house. There are ditches on both sides of this road which are classified as streams. At present it appears that the current system is in a state of failure. I was told the owner is using a septic tank as a holding tank. I saw evidence of a high ground water table, and that at some time the untreated septic tank effluent has daylighted on the property. Stakes were already in place on what was to have been the outside dimensions of the peat system. Because the water table is near the surface of the ground it was necessary to construct the system as a mound completely above ground. The existing slope of the site also made it somewhat difficult to construct. I was told this was a three bedroom home with a design requirement of 150 gal/bedroom. Because the peat I have used will effectively treat lgpd/sq.ft. I moved the stakes so that the bed would have a surface of 16 ft X 30ft (480 sq.ft.). Mary wanted to discharge the treated effluent directly into the undisturbed peat below the bed and had already placed some of the broken block within the bed area. Although subsurface disposal of the treated effluent directly under the peat field has been shown to be acceptable in Maine, for this project it was more prudent to line the system and include an underdrain with a sample port so that monitoring of the effluent may be accomplished in such a way that the results can be compared with my previous work. I also feel strongly that an underdrain design allows collection of a more representative sample of the treated effluent, and thus more accurate results may be obtained. Dan Roth and Steve Morris of the municipal On -Site Services Program were on site for the construction of both this and the system at Bird. Their presence was invaluable to me in that I could consult with them immediately whenever I had any questions about local regulations concerning on-site systems. In addition to their advice, they also provided most of the manual labor during construction of the fields. If all of the proper paperwork had been completed beforehand as I had requested, and I had had the opportunity to spend time with the on-site services personnel and the excavator prior to construction, everything would have gone much more smoothly. It took much longer to construct the system than I feel is necessary. But under the circumstances I don't think anyone could have done it in less time. The excavator was more than cooperative and was also working under somewhat adverse conditions. During construction I learned the home was actually rated for four fdrooms instead of three. nrtunately the work had not progressed too far at that point and there was ample room to extend the end of the field to 40 feet, making the area 640 sq.ft. The system was constructed on top of the existing peat with no undue disturbance of the surface vegetation. A liner of Visqueen was placed on the surface and the sides were built up to hold this liner in place. The liner extends approximately two feet up the sides and ends of the system. A layer of broken block was then placed on the liner and hand-picked to remove large pieces of brick and block. The underdrain (4in. perforated pipe) was bedded in the broken block and extended through the membrane with solid pipe. A sample well was constructed by placing a X connection in the solid pipe, capping the bottom, and extending the top above ground where it was covered with a removable cap. Approximately three feet of prepared peat was added above the porous material and then ditched.to receive the rock and distribution pipes. As each line was dug out rock was placed on the bottom to a depth of about 3 in. and perforated pipe was placed on the rock and leveled. Additional rock was added to the depth of the pipe before the top 18 in. of peat was put in place. The distribution network consisted of six 4 in. diameter perforated pipes, each 26 ft. long and interconnected with solid pipe at each end. Pipes were lain 2.5 ft. on center with approximately 2 ft. between the outer pipes and the limits of the peat. Additional peat was added for the surround. Work stopped at the end of a rather long day on Friday, July 10, 1987, with half of the distribution pipes in place at Rabbit Creek Heights. On Saturday morning the entire crew returned to finish putting in the distribution pipes and adding the top 18 inches of peat to the system. The peat system was then complete with the exception of some grading of the surround. Other work which remained included adding more perforated pipe beyond the sample well for final disposal of treated effluent into the.existing ditch behind the house, covering this pipe with rock, installation of a new two chamber septic tank which will include a lift station, installation of the pipe from the lift station to the distribution network in the peat field, and setting the pump to dose the system with a maximum of 0.5 gal/linear foot of perforated pipe within the field. The owner is having a new well installed which will be located more than 100 ft. from the treatment field. The owner said the existing ditxh behind the house will eventually be filled in. I advised her to extend the perforated discharge pipe in this ditch for at least 100 feet if possible before it surfaces to ground level, and to bed the pipe in rock. It was at this point that the entire crew moved down to Bird to begin the process once more. Bird site --When Th and I visited this sit^on Thursday she showed me where she expected to put the field. I had some concerns as to what would really be the best spot for the system. The test pit was located outside of the proposed field area. A utilities pole with underground connections to the house and across the street to another house was located in the center of the lot. There is a 20 foot right of way from the road according to Mary. Also there is a steep slope at the left side of the property. Mary showed me the location of property lines and the well. We measured the distance from the well and discussed the location of the treatment field further. There was a very large tree located just at the edge of the 100 foot separation distance from the well and even though the owner had volunteered to take it down I hoped we could save it if at all possible. Mary also indicated that the owner wished to keep the driveway in its present location. I observed an uncovered septic tank with dirty water surfacing around it and then flowing off in a ditch to the side of the property. I was told this was only gray water. Mary did not know where the existing treatment field was located, but thought it was directly between the tank and the road, but did not know how it was constructed. On this site I had been told the soils were such that a larger area was required per bedroom and I laid out a tentative area for the field to the left of the utilities pole. • When the decision was made to line this system, it was possible to decrease the field size to 16 ft X 30 ft. as this was a three bedroom house. With a ground water table located at 5.5 ft it was possible to put at least part of this system within the ground and still maintain a 4 ft separation from the bottom of the field. Prior to my arrival the owner had taken a week of his vacation time to prepare the peat which was stocked on site. He had spread it out all over his front yard to dry, broken it up, and removed all woody materials. When Bub Neilson arrived at the site he had a much better idea of what was going to happen and was able to stack the prepared peat where it would be available easily during the actual construction. Once again because Dan and Steve were on site I was able to consult with them on the best location for the system. The owner was most cooperative and said there was no problem with moving his driveway, or anything else we wanted to do. He also volunteered to assist in any way he could during construction on Saturday. However he would not be able to be with us during the week as he works on the North Slope. An excavation was made between the utilities' pole and the existing drive. This was then lined with Visqueen. An 8 inch layer of sand was placed over the membrane and the 4 inch perforated underdrain was then bedded in this sand. Two and a half -feet of pe�were added above the sand�efore work stopped for the day. Be. :e Bub left the site he cored the stockpile of prepared peat with plastic. The peat field was also covered with plastic to protect it from rain until Monday when work would resume. On Monday the crew again assembled and the distribution pipes were bedded in rock and covered with an additional 18 in. of peat. A sample well was placed in the underdrain pipe about one foot from the liner. When the soils were being excavated from the area for the peat system a large vein of sand was observed at approximately the two foot level. Oral history of the site indicated there had been a ridge which ran along this property line and it was possible this sand would be adequate for the acceptance of the treated effluent from the field. A decision was made to discharge this effluent into a 7 ft wide trench which ran parallel to the property line and perpendicular to the treatment field. Two 4 in perforated piped were placed 4 feet on center with 1.5 ft from pipe to side walls. These pipes were placed over 6 in of rock, covered with 6 in of rock and then Typar before being backfilled with spoils. A test well was also installed to monitor the level of the ground water. This also allowed Dan and Steve to do another soil profile adjacent to the trench. When we finished at the end of the day the treatment field and the disposal trench were complete and a 500 gal lift station had been delivered. Bub Neilson was to return on Tuesday to install the lift station, connect the feed line to the distribution network, cut the driveway, and do the finish grading. This system went in easier than the first for several reasons: the excavator was able to place materials where he wanted them, sand was used under the peat unstead.of material used in the previous field (required much'less time and labor to put in place), part of the system was in ground which made it easier to line and build side walls, and there was a better understanding of the process as a whole. RECOMMENDATIONS Thermocouples should be placed in both fields a minimum of four depths below the surface: just above the distribution pipes, just below the distribution pipes, one foot below the distribution pipes, and two feet below the distribution pipes at the sand/peat interface. If funding is available, useful information could•be obtained by placing thermocouples in mineral soils about 20 feet from the peat field at the same depths from the surface as above. I would strongl "recommend that samples be Cillected of both influent to, and effluent from, each of the two peat systems once each month for a full year. Tests should include suspended solids, BODS, pH, fecal coliforms, dissolved oxygen (DO), and nitrate nitrogen. Temperature of influent and effluent should be recorded immediately prior to sample collection. A sample of each month's effluent should be retained for visual comparison of the color change over time. In addition to the above, I recommend that all samples be collected by an independent contractor. Sample wells must be evacuated within 12 hours prior to sample collection to remove any material trapped in the wells which could contribute to erroneous results. Testing of the samples should follow Standard Methods. At the end of a full year of testing an evaluation will have to be made as to whether to continue the tests or not. I should point out that my experience has been the peat systems tend to improve with age and I would not be concerned if the first month or two the effluent did not meet the standards for BOD5 or suspended solids. If the local peat proves acceptable, and funding is available, I would recommend installing at least two systems without liners. These would have to be sized according to code and could be tested by placing a series of slotted and wrapped pipes below the peat and outside the limits of the field on the downslope side. Future systems must go through the permitting process prior to construction. Having the proper paperwork in hand would make it easier for the excavator to do his job. It would also eliminate the possibility of misunderstanding on the part of anyone from agency to owner about what is required or expected and exactly where individual responsibilities lie. SUMMARY Two experimental on-site peat systems have been installed and a testing regime has been recommended. Both systems have lift stations and are lined with an underdrain and contain a sample well. Influent to the systems may be collected from the septic tanks or the lift stations. Final disposal of treated effluent is subsurface in rock filled trenches. Recommended tests include BODS, DO, TSS, Nitrate -Nitrogen, Fecal coliforms, and pH. Temperature of influent and effluent should be monitored. Thermocouples should be placed at various depths within the peat system to monitor temperature. If possible a duplicate set of thermocouples should be placed in mineral soil approximately 20 feet from the peat system. The systems took longer to construct than expected. The major reason was the lack of written plans and the fact that many decisions had t be made in the field duriln construction. Many delays could have been avoided had I received copies of site evaluations, plans, and permits as agreed upon. The Nielsen Brothers are to be commended for their excellent work under what,I am sure, were sometimes trying conditions. The lack of documentation and my unfamiliarity with the municipal codes would have made it virtually impossible for me to make competent on-site decisions, had it not been for the assistance of Dan Roth and Steve Morris of the Municipal On -Site Services Program. Their assistance was invaluable to me and to the success of the project and I appreciate the fact that their superiors allowed them to spend several days with me in the field, especially on such short notice. With any experimental system it is absolutely necessary that full communication, backed up by written documentation, be maintained with all parties involved from the beginning of the project. I cannot stress too strongly that proper procedure be followed in the future. In conclusion may I say that this has been a very interesting experience. I expect the peat systems to function adequately. I request that a copy of all the paperwork and the as-builts be sent to me as they become available. • ▪ • - •.1• i a u • 1 l it 1.. rxr2re: Mp/Jr/9I- l f • • .•7 • � y W LLJ cn T• e— LLl ✓ Lza 04. 4 4. S • < F;; — -e o: 0 • • • 1 fl • •••••�Cir L -• • i { tl z rc t t• K--- xG •r 1 •1. ti • r� c• ZZ OC `it - •• <7i W '44 • }pi 0 Li: oo0g r 1 •1• '•-1 1 t7 w rt m tti H h O H H CT i7 O H- H n w O rt H• H• y- H• n rt y N. O O O rn m r+, r n O f h LO ° cn 4 (D N a ct n a w rn H �, o rt � O h w z� O n rt rt z ct rt rt rt rt rt � 0 L4 rt 7C H rt C rt �'v O (D H rt (D ti 0 0 w O H 4 O y rtH•O' y z w \H -r n m N cn C h] a' (D cn m m �O w 5 m (DH m � cin N (D Q,� > mro C m L=J O L= ro r. � 51 (D 'U O m w O rt V w rr (D w H m rt ;U H > m rt (D rt O O n n O m O O�:r H > rr, n H- H (D (D rt �r O Z m a H- (D rt f1 0 H- O H (D n H• E C H w w 5C; m w w w n H• (D K O�:l Z O rt n O H• rt O O� ro w rt 0 z z rt z rt m�:5 a r� rt n n H-ro 4 C E r Hr O�:l El (D �:S 5 '•C O (D w rt E m s (D � O E O rfi ti �5 (D rt ° ro (n H O rt m (� -- t7 O O o, (D m � m H H• r "0 (D �4 �i � � H � � G m w w i n H a s m n O m m m r -j -' " kC `'C E O y aw n rr O roK �:l aw w t+ w rfi rr H• (n ro H -v m n ct H • O rt ro � (D PJ O ` a' a�� W � y H O m (D m m rt ((DD n n H m H:1 (D ((D cn h rt H a rpt ti rt P. H• rt m K a m m ¢, O H- m rt W °, w o N' o m am (D0 m O rn �j' H a � ((DD6< C (mn is'��+0 H' - H. m rtti"m om no N H `�� 0V ctmOE3mro 0 m 5 m ti (D O rrro wmoro n'a� p rt nOwm mrt0 a Own 'rocnO H"0tt0 ro rt rt tr > wOrt o ¢, ro- E 0 Z O m ti ri m H-rn (t E w m rt E G rr ro wmrtm z £ ro p- ft rt w mmaH• m0rrtirtm��m • m�mmmmwa m O rwt (� w G w 0 y x g oo ft mro `tx� rtO z rt mEH-a z1✓ nrrnm - Oa HO c r a(D Om 'C3 rt w �c 11:1o� Z rt F.A. r m�z o o O n z wro H ro C C0 n tnn H -w rt m rt- Z�4 m w 0 rwtm rt rt m ro as m o mm rn m��m ��• rtw� rt (D 0h O rt rt ¢ www m a'ro o wN m a mmww ° O ccn w (D w H• H• H (D H cn(DN cHrN of � ro O "o H•ny C rt ct �4rt,a� �rn m G Cr r• 'Croom m 0 m 0 fi w m w o ago a w Zr H- rt rt O H• E 4 H OrtmCwm w� >n a' art of a Ert H•O' O n (D ft am H- ::r E ::r (D m Nrt Q 0 n 4 w ' mm rt o 0 (D PC (D mt7mm F, wa°, mor°i, m::I w O ro w E O o rwt� rw+- x rt, ojrt• m N ::$ rn m m H• ct (D 0 am�mCO pi H• � � ' m oj((DD a r, rn El "a o m n m tt � 0 rt � ro Pi w p m rt E m n ti y rt F� O rM H- rZH-rt0 00(DH P- (D t3'm OCH rra (t o� > (D w . m ¢� c � m � H- "d E tr rt (D (n E m H• rr 0 ro tr n o m O n rr ri is ,� H m C a a w r tw w m rr(D r,n r, H, �m m H3 ate, � ��, w mmrt01.0 O wrr H tt�-m0rZ (n 10 Ort rn w w O �l E L4 o rn w n �:s �r H• H• � I rt :� H' H• H• m t7 w rt m tti H h O H H CT i7 O H- H n w O rt H• H• y- H• n rt y O O O rn m r+, r n O f h LO ° cn 4 (D m wm O O o m �, o rt m tc (DD w r n O w w z� O n rt rt z ct rt rt rt rt z H -'•C rt C rt �'v O ct = wro � LC xr :7, 0r H-� w L1'm 3 - a � y rtH•O' m m O m a' (D cn m m �O w 5 m � rtn (D n ►~n (n mro C m L=J O L= ro r. � 51 (D 'U O m w O rt V w rr (D w H rt w O 3 m rt (D rt O O n (D ro ro rt .7 rr, n H- H (D (D rt �r O Z m a H- (D rt f1 0 H- O H (D n H• E C H w w 5C; m w w w n H• (D K O�:l Z O rt n O H• rt O O� ro w rt 0 z z rt z rt m�:5 a r� rt n n H-ro 4 C E r Hr O�:l El (D �:S 5 '•C O (D H (D � O E O rfi ti �5 (D rt rt (D r• w Z n • O n ro (n H O rt m (� -- t7 O O � O ti H• r "0 (D �4 �i � � H � � G m w w i n H a s m n O (D N n (n m r -j -' " kC `'C E O y aw n rr O roK �:l aw w t+ w rfi rr H• ti m tr ct H • O rt ro � (D PJ O ` w E aH•ft ((DD H O m (D m ((DD n n H m H:1 (D ((D cn h rt H a rpt ti rt P. H• rt m K O H- m rt W rt m 0 �x m am (D0 m O H. b � ((DD6< C (mn is'��+0 H' - H. m rtti"m om no N H `�� 0V ctmOE3mro 0 m 5 m ti (D O rrro wmoro n'a� rt nOwm mrt0 a Own 'rocnO H"0tt0 > wOrt o ¢, ro- E 0 Z o (t E w m rt E G rr ro wmrtm z £ ro p- ft rt w mmaH• m0rrtirtm��m • m�mmmmwa m• HP rtmOH- 0 y x g oo ft mro rtO z rt mEH-a z1✓ nrrnm - Oa HO c r a(D Om 'C3 rt o O a< 11:1o� Z rt F.A. "Cro � r- H. HH•�r-ro0 ro m "w(t o O n xmm wro H mo rt C C0 n tnn H -w rt m rt- Z�4 m w rwtm wro ro as m o mm rn m��m ��• rtw� rt (D O rt rt ¢ www m a'ro o wN m c n rt a ccn w (D cn(DN cHrN of � ro O "o m C rt m rnm rt m Hr�t0 r• 'Croom m yw m Zr H- rt rt O H• E 4 H OrtmCwm w� >n p -O m Ert H•O' O n (D ft am H- ::r E ::r (D m Nrt Q 0 n 4 w O mm (D PC (D mt7mm F, wa°, mor°i, m::I w O ro E O o rwt� �•H- n w�rn� ojrt• m m M (DH• H• ct (D 0 am�mCO pi mmrt O(D m m oj((DD a r, 5 H•a� El "a o m n m tt � 0 rt � ro Pi w p m rt E m ti y rt F� O rM H- rZH-rt0 00(DH P- (D t3'm OCH rra (t o� (D � m � H- "d E tr rt (D (n E m H• rr 0 ro tr n o m O n rr ri H. H m C a a w r tw w m rr(D r,n ti a �m m H3 ate, � ��, O wrr H tt�-m0rZ (n 10 Ort rn w w O �l E L4 n �:s �r H• H• m rt C - w to rt rt :� H' H• H• cu p ft rt t r_- �C rm m ::I rt Nn m ctCm N m K cn O rt ro- (D rn tt N p o w rt rr t� � m �,w w >ct m w w m o ww rt 0 H. n n H- rt a rn m y i -n P-ro n N n C (D 4 w rr rt m m C1 0 rt m O rt :' n O(D rt rt m rt m O Z rt rn'-7 ro 4 ro0 K� (D w n m rrrt�o' 0tim�moo �� N 0 orr �ro (D m wwnwrnn �:sro0 (D (n �5'Hm H• m�5 G mmC1 s✓Z w rt �° HO rt 0 rr,, 40rtro w5ct Qro n m w aw o O ct (D C rt a m r r-Emmmmw art a o a m w M rt rt � O 1 m O '-C a' `� (D c i ki C :31 @ P- > tr to @ � @ M H 1-3 ` (xD EEn A' t0-� \ (xD ti A� > > rt m O d rt rt � �' r- tai O ;N'rt H tt--j ty=1 ct @ rt r� QJ @ = H @ (D @ ( O Z ti w ( @ (D @ 5 M C @ rt ct @ C� rt rt @ n > > cn ° C ® D Cn (t O m @ (n rt �O H > r O =" H > �G �C O n P- Z @ H t-1 4Q aizF 521 ::1 H C1 @ ti (D n(D�aC�U�i cn aj @ 5Dj W \ N @ @ ¢' 0 u�i Cl, w ti A� As �z rt rt 5= "c7 (n H O @ N En O @ N Q, Q, ((DD 4 rt @ O r3 m5:zw w:s (n 5 ::j w w t� @ W � � Q t0n w t7° 7a' @ �, tt, r'n rt ((D tJ � Q¢ i Aad �..� N 't1 ct t j a-, ¢7 In tZ U1 (n O "c7 @ O W P O �Q (n O \ �, @ t3 En @ cn cn @ (n t-' (n (D rt E F- cn @ rt ft to O O - ` (D n 4 4 @ @- F- "C tr �;,N ", O Cf S1� ¢, @ (D rt @ O (D H �C m � (D } � @ @ @ rt rt rt ¢% F.,. i1 tr @ n (D o @ iz @ rt rt r✓ \ ¢� rt, En (t L1+ w O @ @ @ �+ rt (n (D` (D -(D w @ tfi r• O @ @ @@ ti (n K rt 0 @ r -n @ (D �r n �• @ w Lo @ • n o rt H. t -h @ (n °`4 rt Cf3 N @ Pi @ @ ti r� r. to 0 O 4 U1 Pi ::; ~ M �j rt t3^ �2, H- O @ H O fi" W ti W rt @ rt O ¢� N �o rt O iA t:l @ 0 @j i ki It of C:D'@tom•5>V 'H to @ � H N ` (xD EEn A' > rt O a rt tt O �' H tt--j @ H ct @ rt r� QJ @ = H @ (D G O Z ti w ( @ @ rt ct @ C� - > ® H D Cn (t r O =" H > �G O H 0 td- Z(D @ ti (D aj @ 5Dj W \ N @ 1-3 A� rt rt ::; b us O @ N Q, ((DD uQ ft ((D O r3 m5:zw w:s @ W � � t0n w t7° 7a' @ tt, :z ct (D Q¢ i Aad �..� N 't1 ct t j a-, ¢7 Pty @ F • tZ U1 (n O �Q rt En O \ rh @ w @ (n F- cn @ O tr �;,N ", O Cf S1� @ @ LQ (D H �C m � (D } � @ @ x O ¢% F.,. i1 tr @ @ rt rt r✓ rt \tT w O @ @ �+ rt (n ¢ @ @ @@ 0 @ n t -n • n o rt t -h @ ti N @ Pi @ @ ti r� r. to U1 ` (n rt Ort rt O fi" W ti W rt @ O ¢� N �o iA t:l @ @j � th rt rt O O It of ALASKA 6OROPf11CflTAL COf1TROL SER2 CS, If1C. engineering 6 enuironmental Studies June 19. 1987 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health & Human Services 825 L Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Re: Delak's Addition, Lot 125 Waiver tWR87-010A Dear Dan: On May 12th, 1987 I did a soil test on the subject lot. The soils were a silty gravel with sand seams. getting moist with depth and with occasional boulders. On the 19th, the water level had risen to 6 feet and on the 22nd it was down to 7 feet. The percolation test shows the soils rating as 215 square feet per bedroom. The site plan shows this lot to be a very unusual lot with the well in such a position that there 1s only one spot on the lot that a sewer system could go. Presently there is a driveway that covers a portion of were the system could go. Also, there is fair quanitity of trees, approximately 4 inch 1n diameter that will have to be removed. In order for the system to be installed the compacted area of the abandoned driveway would need to be removed. The excavation would then be backfilled with a pit run gravelly sand. The existing septic tank is within the 100 foot well radius but It does have water tight couplings. Therefore we feel that structurally it is in good condition. There is a grey water area In the house that will need to be hooked up to the system. The proposed system would be within a 989 square foot area which is slightly more than the area required for the system. It is a at 50 foot set back from the slope and is away from a lower area along the road. A lift station would be required on this lot, in order to install the bed. This lift station is outside the 100 foot radius to the well. There are no other reserve areas on this lot. If you have any questions please let me know. Signed by: es . ..est,OF A�int& 45 • to REID, JR. • \ 2251 • ,t 1200 West 33rd Autnue. Suitt B • Anchorage. Alaska 99503 • (907) 561-5040 ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SERVICC'INC, 1200 West 33rd Avenue. Suite B ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 (907) 561.5040 JOB De /: eTh SHEET NO CALCULATED BY CHECKEDBY t SCALE I't 1 Ian r" -q• -T-co -T— o t 1 i g I' . 1 ! I•=; 1 I (• ,.j s-1 1 II i lI 1 i ( J c I -r-' • f It I i 1-f 1 ti 1 1 I • 1 - i i I t 1 1 . i.• --_tom!_-__... I 1 � � 1. i• i I l- 1 I 1 —1— t�1 I I I 7 -1 , — ---1. —t , — + -� — r I r— J 1 • I I.; i I I I I.I ! I___ i -T I I �ly_',,f..i,f!_ I 11 118' i11 II ;1 ;! ;^j`; j 1 1 1 1:1:: ' 1 i 1 j 1 I —1-1 .;' Lj—j T I-7, j. H— i I !--7, T T .1 i I 'Ij 1 I 1I. ( 1-_-1i 1 I,r,i H-4 I N t C, .I JPS• ..... t..P4 41 1:71-7-1. - 14 %9 I _ T fir f;IA 1 ..� ...,...:.., r • .4• C.IRE1D. JR.4 s:19.11 I I I � •CE 225 ,�• i I — � C ""• i. I I 11 I ;. .j ; i' i ! i. ' ,k1b.��f'I T i s. 1 I i I I 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 I IN' I- 1 I '.1 1' i i t ►^ —I --+— a 4 1 1 I1 1I f: 11;!• II •—tag. la4 -- 1 1 I _1 I I I I 1 _1 1 . I I° I .,fl $1 . ck ; O I i it ... t .. , 1 -t i I 1 1—i- 1 1 -1 -- se.'4 /sr. n,M./444i I i I—.1 1 i I i_. I I. 1 I 1 %~ ') ? 1 I'11 • I tit ! i ! 1 1 1 i - Ler/2A - 1• • • ' • ' ti / 7. Go/ /2C — Se • EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE RECORDED / PLAT,'ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. • •'EOFzght' i * 49TN .,. , • -g..1 Awn.. Kai! Dowling. �� 15645 ;•j • II pRU ESSIDNAL scar kECEk• kS-&WtT • LOT SURVEY CERTIFICATION - LOT •126. et lckxxxxxxx' nf1 evrc AfoiTitlN (Plat 7C_1RA) • • ANCHORAGE RECORDING DISTRICT BY: DOWLING •6- ASSOCIATES • g04 EAST 15th Ave. Suite 2 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 • •FEPARED .— 10y. 1 ors. o:/ ii .7DIwo. LEGEND: BRASS CAP MONUMENT O IRON PIPE • STEEL PIN 13 SURVEY NUB a TACK, 4' REVISIONS Residence of: . DATE a• BY 1 F.B. 1GRID: PERFORMED FOR: ' = �0�•I • Municipality of Anchorage i CQ; T DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICE',••• 49 8251." Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650 SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST # .• �Iva7 NolaMc/e/ Site % LEGAL DESCRIPTION:A J /Z 13 A /a IPS S✓ b 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DEPTH (FEET) Oi_, 6rjre/ calf Sa-nd Sea. s C6 m3 S. //9 Gray,/ 1,4 ,44 0 CC)/.o./ l0,+ Alt g. /10r et lir Ts ,COMMENTS at, (d /-2 {'/. So; is PERFORMED BY. DAitit Y F AL 9; INEER•S SEAL) ..••. '9 R •$ •........ •.% C. REID, .ae : 0 `k\\my:* Township, Range, Section: no KJ Rico s/O (.Ins- 3 20 / SLOPE SITE PLAN or 1 WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED? IF YES, AT WHAT DEPTH? S L O P E Depth to Wow Aller r Monitoring? alt S7/'1'/82 11 • PA), 1N 81raa f r 4 17 Nr -.r {/: Reading • Date Gross Time Ne Time Depth o Water Net Drop S If . Or. / 1 us" D 0 0•yr 1'1_rrnr o - gab; ar— 9 O O'��rT . S rio 0 ,. e •o PERCOLATION RATE 2 / . (minutes inch) PERC HOLE DIAMETER R i TEST RUN BETWEEN /•O FT AND /•`. FT l•t.o/y A.e/7' //(/tt r/iyl rtr1. l 2.k.ror/r@ an -O a/6,r pre rrra'hta/1 &J4J-(Ace t C/as+/7 vpa.. GxerJa7.0.t. /tc PO) ) /et Pc. ,: CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE. DATE 72408 IRev. 4,85) EAGLE R JER ENGINEERINCSERVICES Lou Buten, P.E P.O. Box 773284 Eagle River. Alaska 99577 Telephone (1197) 894-5195 June 16, 1987 Mr. and Mrs. Nowland SRA Box 8507 Bird Creek, Alaska 99540 Dear Mr. and Mrs. lowland: On February 13, 1987 a waiver request for Lot 12B, Delak Addition was granted, with a conditional waiver. One of the conditions of the waiver was that the expected upgrade of the absorption field with an extension of time should be completed by JJ llv 15, 1987 and a soils test with water monitoring done before the upgrade. Attached is a copy for your files. This letter is to serve as a reminder and to inquire if we can be of any service to you. If there are any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 694-5196. Sincerely, Louis Butcra, P.L•. LB:bls attachments cc: Municipality of Anchorage MUNICIPALITY OF ANChlOPAC* DEPT. OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FAUN 18 i9s7 RECEIVED 1' r 1 ALASKA Eflbu50f1[Ef1TAL COIITIIOL SERUICcS, If1C. Engineering 6 Enmronmentol Studies June 1. 1987 Lance Noland SRA Box 98507 Bird Creek. Alaska 99540 Re: Lot 12B, Delak's Addition •Dear Lance: On May 12, 1987 I made a soil logs of your lot and it is attached. We dug the testhole to 14 feet and noted very wet soils below approximately 6 feet. On the 14th. I returned to do the percolation test in the two holes which we had prepared. I found that the water level had risen to 6 feet. This made this area not possible for a perc test, so I then dug a testhole beside the test at about 1 foot deep. It perced out a 215 square foot per bedroom. This would mean that a bed system would have to be installed on the lot. In order to keep it 100 feet from the well, the system would have to be placed In the area of your driveway. This is tricky in that the ground may be compacted underneath. As I showed you on the sketches which I left for you, there is not a lot of space where you can put the system. You and I had discussed on the telephone the possibility of putting the system on the slope between your lot and lot 12C. This would not be possible as it would still be within the 100 foot of the well radius. In the paper I gave you I discussed the possibility that you could move the well in the vicinity of the green house and then you could probably put a system on the slope by filling with a couple feet of dirt at the low end. This could then be tapered out to give you the required slope. However, we would have to do a soil test in the vicinity of the slope top 1f you elect the option to move the well. I know that this has become somewhat disgusting to you in that you have such a problem of getting a system upgraded to meet the code. I think the problem originated with what the original owner did in siting the well without consideration as to what it would do to the lot when the time came for future development. You are reaping the reward of his lack of foresight. I think that your idea of possibly putting the system along side of the bank is a good one. However. it would require you to move the well. In the long run it may be more econmical to move the well and to put 1n a long lasting system on the edge of the slope. If you have any questions please let me know. Sincerely, Leroy . Reid ;4. PhD. PE Pres] eat ,inn tit.., 9i..t A....... l.W. R • AMCIroMN Aintin carol .font) 54'.5040 n Municipality of Anchorage February 13, 1987 n P.O. BOX 196650 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650 (907) 264-4111 TONY KNO WLES, MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8 HUMAN SERVICES Lou Butera, P.E. Eagle River Engineering Services P.O. Box 773294 Eagle River, Alaska 99577 Subject: Waiver request for Lot 12B Delak Addition Waiver Number WR87-010A Dear Mr. Butera: Your request for waiver of the required 100 foot separation from a septic tank to a private well for the above mentioned parcel has been given a conditional waiver at this time. The separation distance pending upon conditions being met has been waived to 75 feet. The conditions of this waiver are as follows: 1. At the time of excavation the septic tank is exposed and the integrity of the tank verified and if not already in place, water tight calder couplings or the equivalent be placed on the tank fittings. 2. The expected upgrade of the absorption field with an extension of time should be completed by July 15, 1987 and a soils test with water monitoring done before the upgrade. 3. The upgrade of this system should have a minimum of two inspections performed by a certified engineer with this department. If you have any questions of the conditions of this waiver please feel free to contact me at 264-4680. Sincerely, Daniel J. Roth Civil Engineer On -Site Services im,EAGLE RIVER ENGINEERING SERVICES E4 Fe ruary 9, 1987 Lon Batera P.E. P.O. Box 773294 Eagle River, Alaska 99577 Telephone (907) 6945195 Mr. Daniel J. Roth Municipality of Anchorage Civil Engineer, On-site Services P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 99519 REF: Lot 12B Delak Addition Waiver #WR 87-010 Dear Mr. Roth: I have received your waiver determination dated February 3, 1987 regarding the above referenced lot. I am resubmitting this application with additional information in the belief that you misinterpreted our original request. The original submittal letter dated 1/16/87 requested a possible waiver to 75' separation distance for an existing septic tank. Your reply stated that septic systems installed post 1968, which are undocumented, require proper extensive testing of the leachfield soil conditions. We are in agreement with your statement but at this time we are only concerned with the feasibility of keeping the Septic Tank in its present location. We are not at this time asking for approval of the leachfield and the owner is aware that a soil test and proper permit is re3�u`ired for leachfield approval. The present owner is currently int3jd'igatiop2 with the previous owner (seller) regarding the septic system and only desires a determination on the permanence of the septic tank location at this time. As stated in our original letter, the tank approval can be made conditional on an engineers inspection of the exposed septic tank. The owner at this time requires only a waiver determination with regard to the septic tank only. I believe the appropriate waiver fees have been paid directly by the owner.. Please reference, as an example, a similar waiver request WR 87-011, Lot 2 Block 5 Riverview (attached) which involves determination of a septic tank location only. If you have any questions, or if any additional information is requested, please feel free to contact me at 694-5195. Thank You, Lou Butera, P.E. 2 Municipaaty of Anchorage February 3, 1987 P.O.r\X 196650 ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99519-6650 (907) 264-4111 TONY KNO WLES, MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH E. HUMAN SERVICES Lou Butera, P.E. Eagle River Engineering Services P.O. Box 773294 Eagle River, Alaska 99577 Subject: Waiver request for Lot 12B Delak Addition Waiver number WR87-010 Dear Mr. Butera: Your request for a waiver of distance of well to septic tank/seepage pit and health authority approval cannot be approved at this time. Systems installed after the effective date of the ordinance(1968) which are undocumented must have the engineer provide dimensions of the system and verify type and size of tank. Appropriate soil testing will be required and water monitoring. At the time the absorption system is being documented the engineer must expose and verify the integrity of the septic tank and if not already fitted with water tight couplings must do so. This will apply even if the Department has previously signed a health authority approval on the property. Sincerely, Daniel J. Roth Civil Engineer On -Site Services EAGLE RIVER ENGINEERING SERVICES .4k4 January 16, 1987 Lon Buten P.E.P.A. Box]]]E4f P.O. 773294 Eagle River, Alaska 99577 Telephone (907) 694-5195 Mr. Steve Morris Civil Engineer, On-site Services Municipality of Anchorage P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 99519 REF: Lot 12B Delak Addition Dear Mr. Morris: MaaaCtPAUfl OF ANCNORAL$ DEPT. Of HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IJAN 2 91987 RECEIVED On behalf of my client, Mr. & Mrs. Lance Nowland, I am submitting a waiver of MEM the information necessary for your determination of iniase ar t' tance, The septic system was installed by a previous owner without an inspection by the Municipality at that time. As per the inspection report enclosed, a later request for Health approval was granted based on a 1983 adequacy test for two bedrooms. Our field measurements confirm the tank inlet to be at 74' from the well. -"The enclosed well log that the well draws from an unconfined sand aquifer at a depth of 76'. The casing is continous to 79' where it penetrates the sand layer. The soil stratum above the sand layer is classified, till, grey & hard which I would take to mean a dense silty soil. The well log for adjacent lot 12A describes a similar sand aquifer at 83'. The surface topography is such that any surface seepage would be directed away from the well location toward a 15% slope to the west. Research of neighboring soil logs has disclosed a sandy -silt soil type with no water table to 18' (lot 12A). A water sample for coliform bacteria in 1982 was satisfactory. The well is located opposite the house from the septic tank so that the full basement would act to separate the well from the tank. It is expected that once this waiver is approved, the owner will be applying for an on-site septic permit. During the installation of,a new leach trench the tank can be inspected and proper water tight fittings can be installed. A waiver to 74' would be basically consistent with current State requirements for a holding tank. If there are any required, please feel free Thank You, questions or to contact me if additional information is at 694-5195. tAMICWOEEAANOgRMtE OWL OF TH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION JAN 291987 \Lou Butera, F.E. i -a9-2/ att'oca-o -i etio.c t-ttVED LIM. LW MAIM & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION I- c t 1 Q Pe /< K 4,40'66 -•EAGLE R11tR MoD ENGINEERING SEI, ACES WIt1.987 SHEET NO P. 0. Box 773294 EAGLE RIVER, AUff CALCULATED e,. /.it"?: re- Phone -4Phone 694 -►Z ttriVED CHECKED BY SCALE / 'r- 4/ e OF DATE 3/,r/F 2 DATE MAO Al1(nres)is. Os 1St 1101 LOCATION OF WELL (P1 on complals silk r 10, Ib or lc.) WATER WELL RECORD STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURES Division of Geological & Geophysicol Surveys Drilling Permit No. A oR 10001 5950 DLI Borough Lnch. Subdivision DelnkcAdd. Lot 12-D Block lb. —of_ot y. qtrs. —of — Section No. To.nehlp NQ SQ Range ED WO Meridian Ice DISTANCE ANO DIRECTION FROM ROAD INTERSECTIONS S Ad and Ar.o of Well Location S. OWNER OF Address:•F. WELL: Jr,;/ Bird Fr •zier Box EG/)4 creek, Ar. 9995!1f 2. WELL LOG Feel B.lo. Surface 4. WELL DEPTH: (final) S. DATE OF COMPLETION Materiel Type Top 79 11. -�I -... Bottom _Z rill: rrev rnr? here 4 7,; 6. ricabl. tool 0 Ro o.y 0 Orir.n 0 Dag :and: bror:n with water 76 79 QAua•r Qd•tted 0Bored QOther : 7.USE:E5 Domestic Q Public Supply Q Industry Q Irrigation Q Recharge Q Commerlcot Q T.at Well Q olh.r: 6 CASING: Thr.od•d Q Q Welded dial. r In. 10 79 ft. Depth Weight 17 lbs./ ft. diem. In. to 1t. Depth Sliekup ft. 9 FINISH OF WELL: Open totton Type: Diameter: Slot/Mesh Size: Lengthy ,.IUMIrIPAI ITY Of ANCHORAGE Set b•I nem ft. and ft. rrn c',17." -TA p• Backfilling Gravel ENVIR.14..I..A...0 C r: 1 pack 10. STATIC WATER LEVEL: 7? ft. 7 /n /' q • CEP1 Q Above or T3 Bao• land surface Dal. Eampm.nr used: r:alld lino RECEIVED (?.PUMPING LEVEL below land surface and YIELD 76 ft. after 2 hr.. pumping 15 g.p.m. ll. after hrs. pumping g.p.m. 12.GROUTING WII Grouted: Q Ye. Q No Mal•rlol: Q Neat Cement J Other: 111turrl 13. PUMP: (If available) HP Length of Drop Pip. ft. Coped?Y g.p.m. Q Su bm. Q Jet Q CenlrItical Q Other I4.REMARKS: 16. WATER WELL CONTRACTORS CERTIFICATION: 15. Water Tom ____• 0 F 0 C This ..ti .as drilled under my jurisdiction and this report Is true to the best of my knowledge and belief; Focr Grilling AA 0753 • R•gia.r•d Business Nome Contract Llc.n.. Number Adams: !...2 2 lio;: ?5C0 Chu,•iC:, ;}k. 99557 slga.d:Y-1c , (0-r Njr---).-•4.- Dat.: 0/f)/62 Authorized Rep roe Form 02•WWR (11/61) Copy DI.tribution: WHITE, Stat. 0608, PINK• Driller, CANARY -Customer oR 10001 5950 t7Ut+i I C I F•htL_ I T'r OF= f=1t-4C1-.QFfR0E DEF'AR'TMENT i1 HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL OTECTION 825 '' ,STREET, ANCHORAGE, AK. 9_ _c1 264-4720 L_ L_ F`CFt+i I T PERMIT NO. ( 820433 ) APPLICANT JAY FP..AZIEP. SRBO?C 0644 BIRD CREEK 99540 653-8302 LOCATION BIRD CREEK LEGAL DELAKS ADDITION LOT 12-8 LOT SIZE 32000 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN A WELL AND AN'? ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS 100 FEET FOR A PRIVATE WELL OR 150 TO 200 FEET FROM A PUBLIC WELL DEPENDINGG UPON THE TYPE OF PUBLIC WELL. MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM A PRIVATE WELL TO Fl PRIVATE SEWER LINE IS 25 FEET AND TO A COMMUNITY SEWER LINE IS 75 FEET. WELL LOGS ARE REQUIRED AND MUST BE RETURNED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE WELL COMPLETION. OTHER REQUIREMENTS MAY APPLY. SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAt9_ ARE AVAILAE:LE TO INSURE PROPER INSTALLATION. F F: ret I T E -CF' I FEE L'ECEFv1BEF Ice LS'S2 I CERTIFY THAT 1: I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR. ON-SITE SEWERS AND WELLS A5 SET FORTH BY THE MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. 2: I WILL INSTALL THE SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODES. SIGt1ED: -- ISSUED BV �4_= / _ -- ---DATE V4.0 MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE 0 Development Services Department Phone: 907-343-7904 On -Site Water & Wastewater Section Fax: 907-343-7997 Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval Parcel I. D. 090-021-49 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Complete legal description DELAKS ADDITION LOT 12B Expiration Date: _ / 7 Location (site address) 307 SAWMILL ROAD, BIRD CREEK, ALASKA 99540 Current property owner(s) TYLER AND PIPER MACHAMER Day phone Mailing address Real estate agent 307 SAWMILL ROAD, BIRD CREEK, ALASKA 99540 2. TYPE OF DWELLING: ® Single Family (w/wo ADU) ❑ Duplex ❑ Multiple Dwellings (Single Family and/or Duplex) Day phone 3. NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 4. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL: Private Well ® Private Septic Water Storage ❑ Holding Tank ❑ Community Well ❑ Community ❑ Public Water System ❑ Public Sewer ❑ Waiver request for: Distance: Received by: COSA to be released to the engineer, unless otherwise requested by the engineer. Date: COSA Fee $_ .5 50 ''�' 3� Waiver Fee $ Date of Payment Sz1/2 2 Date of Payment Receipt Number g09065 lgI R3 Receipt Number COSA # 0_5C,2_ 2 I q0 c� Waiver # 5. STATEMENT OF INSPECTION BY ENGINEER As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I verify that my investigation, based on procedures outlined in the Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval Guidelines for this application, shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is (are) safe, functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. I further verify that based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is (are) in compliance with all applicable Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of installation. I acknowledge that On -Site staff may visit the site to verify the information submitted. Name of Firm FIRST WATER CONSULTING Phone 907-350-9566 Address 13030 SUES WAY ANCHORAGE AK 99516 Engineer's Printed Name CURTIS HUFFMAN, PE Date 7/25/22 Comments: This investigation was completed in compliance with MOA guidelines, regulations, and best industry practices / methods. The assessment of the condition of the well and septic applies only to the conditions as of the day tested. The flow and absorption rates may change due to subsurface conditions that may not be observed from the surface, changes in land use, local soil characteristics, groundwater levels that may fluctuate during the year, quality of construction (workmanship & materials), the water usage of the family being served by the system and maintenance. The operational life of all well and septic systems are subject to these various and dynamic characteristics and are outside the control of the evaluator of the well and septic system. Therefore, any estimate of how long a system will function satisfactory /Aw&P• • • • • !�9 �� for current or future occupants or guarantee that no unseen encroachments, deficiencies or *J discrepancies exist can be given by First Water Consulting & FWfS *• •� TH • * �t�/ •• ...... 6. DSD SIGNATURE • • • • • • j '. Curtis Huffman System #1 Approved for bedrooms ��'F��••• CE 128991 • 7/25/22. • System #2 Approved for bedrooms I�IFvPROFESSOW Disapproved Conditional approval for bedrooms, with the following stipulations: \\`l��I�LITYrrrrrrp�"�i ern ST_b� m q ER �0,� fiAM oma; SER By: t^- Original Certificate Date: 0—/ The Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Division (DSD) issues Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval (COSA) based only upon the representations given in paragraph 5 by an independent professional civil engineer registered in the State of Alaska. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions in the professional engineer's work. 7. ATTACHMENTS: COSA Checklist X Nitrate Advisory Septic System Advisory Arsenic Advisory Well Flow Advisory Other Legal Description: DELAKS ADDITION LOT 12B Parcel ID: 090-021-49 If more than 1 septic system on lot: COSA Checklist # of Structure served by this system A. WELL DATA ® Well log is filed with Onsite (or attached) Date drilled 7/30/1982 Total depth 79 ft Cased to 79 ft ® Sanitary seal is functioning correctly ® Wires are properly protected Casing height (above ground) 12+ in. Date of flow test for COSA 6/29/22 Static water level at beginning of test 73 ft. Comments B. TANK DATA Age of tank(s) NA — NEW TANK years Tank type/material STEP / POLY COATED STEEL Measured operating fluid level in septic tank NA ® Standpipes/foundation cleanout per record drawing Date of pumping NA D. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA Well production at time of test 3.5 gpm Water storage tank volume NA gallons Well disinfected for coliform test? ❑ Yes ® No ® Coliform bacteria is Negative Nitrate 0.816 mg/L ❑ Nitrate less than MRL (ND) Arsenic ug/L ® Arsenic less than MRL (ND) Collected by FG1C Date of Sample 6/29/22 C. LIFT STATION ® Required maintenance completed Age of lift station NEW STEP years Lift station material POLY COATED STEEL Comments: Which system tested (date installed) 10/1988 Adequacy test date 6/29/22 ® ALL standpipes present per record drawing Results M Pass For 3 bedrooms Total measured depth from grade 3.9 ft (max) Fluid depth prior to test 0 DRY in Measured depth to pipe invert from grade NA ft (min) Water added 450 gal ® N/A — pressurized field New depth 2 in ® Monitor tubes go to bottom of effective. If not, state depth into effective MOA IR SHOWS V ED Elapsed time 1400 min ® Code -required soil cover over field Final fluid depth 0 in ❑ System presoaked Absorption rate 450 gpd (Required if vacant for greater than 30 days prior to Any rejuvenation treatment (past 12 months) N date of test) Gallons introduced gallons If yes, enter date F Comments/Deficiencies: , E. SEPARATION DISTANCES From Private Well on Lot to: (Please enter distances if less than required or if community well) Septic Tank/Lift Station on Lot > 100' ® Yes if No Community Sewer Manhole/Cleanout > 100' If absorption field is under driveway comment below Property Line > 10' ❑ Yes if No *75+ ft ® Yes if No ft Neighboring Tank > 100' ® Yes if No ft Private Sewer/Septic Line > 25' ® Yes if No ft Absorption Field on Lot > 100' ❑ Yes if No *95+ ft Holding Tank > 100' ® Yes if No ft Neighboring Absorption Fields > 100' Animal Containment > 50' ® Yes if No ft ® Yes if No ft Manure/Animal Excreta Storage > 100' Community Sewer Main > 75' — ®Yes if No ft ®Yes if No ft From Septic/Holding Tank on Lot to: (Please enter distances if less than required) Building Foundations > 10' ® Yes if No ft Surface Water > 100' ® Yes if No ft Property Line > 5' ® Yes if No ft Wells on Adjacent Lots: Absorption Field > 5' ® Yes if No ft Private Wells > 100' Yes if No ft Water Main > 10' ® Yes if No ft Community Wells > 200' ® Yes if No ft Water Service Line > 10' ® Yes if No ft If septic tank is under driveway comment below From Absorption Field on Lot to: (Please enter distances if less than required) Building Foundation > 10' ® Yes if No ft If absorption field is under driveway comment below Property Line > 10' ❑ Yes if No *1+ ft Wells on Adjacent Lots: Water Main > 10' ® Yes if No ft Private Wells >' 100 _ ®Yes if No ft Water Service Line > 10' ® Yes if No ft Community Wells > 200' ® Yes if No Surface Water > 100' ® Yes if No ft F. ENGINEER'S COMMENTS *PER EXISTING MOA WAIVERS. G. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION l certify that l have determined through field inspections and review of Municipal records that the above systems are in conformance with MOA COSA guidelines in effect on this date. .... . TM ......... Curti; Huffman f ��cs' • • . 8/17/2022. �• � ��F�Fa pROFESSIONAL`� Parcel I.D. 090-021-49 Municipality of Anchorage On -Site Water and Wastewater Program (907) 343-7904 Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval Expiration Date: 7-0/ - ( V- 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Complete legal description DelakS Addition, Lot 12B Location (site address) 307 Sawmill Road Girdwood, AK 99687 Current Property owner(s) Kenneth M. Smith Day phone 301-8013 Mailing address P.O. Box 687 Girdwood, AK 99687 Real Estate Agent Day phone 2. TYPE OF DWELLING: Single Family (w/wo ADU) ❑ Duplex ❑ Multiple Dwellings (Single Family and/or Duplex) 3. NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: Three $USMi . TA[ APR 7 2014 4. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL: Individual Well E Individual El Individual Water Storage ❑ Holding Tank ❑ Community Class Well ❑ Community ❑ Public Water System ❑ Public Sewer ❑ WaiverNariance request for: Distance: Received by: COSA to be released to the engineer, unless otherwise requested by the engineer. Date: COSA Fee $ 5210 Waiver Fee $ Date of Payment W 3fiti Date of Payment Receipt Number O 0 9562 Receipt Number COSA # (386/q11/7 Waiver # 5. STATEMENT OF INSPECTION BY ENGINEER As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I verify that my investigation, based on procedures outlined in the Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval Guidelines for this application, shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is (are) safe, functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. I further verify that based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is(are) in compliance with all applicable Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of installation. Name of Firm Anderson Engineering Address P.O. Box 240773 Anchorage, AK 99524 Phone 522-7773 Engineer's Printed Name Michael E. Anderson, P.E. Date 4/3/2014 6. DSD ,"7-- YsSSystem #1 Approved for 3 bedrooms System #2 Approved for bedrooms Disapproved Conditional approval for By: Qe ['4Qeve 49TH ; \ ,:S,�iifa9G? .cro�r�oiv ; :.r', CE -4351 ° rPOrF;tlOrw�`.�`° bedrooms, with the following stipulations: �S ON-SITE fir WA JRWASTFWATER o PROGRAM 4 /. r r The iptinf:rage Development Services Division (DSD) issues Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval (COSA) based only upon the representations given in paragraph 5 by an independent professional civil engineer registered in the State of Alaska. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions in the professional engineer's work. Original Certificate Date: 7. ATTACHMENTS: COSA Checklist X Septic System Advisory Well Flow Advisory COSA blue sheet ( '- .i c Nitrate Advisory Arsenic Advisory Other If more than 1 septic system is on the lot: COSA Checklist # of _ Structure served by this system Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval Checklist Legal Description: Delaks, Lot 12B Parcel ID: 090-021-49 A. WELL DATA Well type Private If A, B, or C provide PWSID # Date completed 7/30/82 Sanitary seal (Y/N) Y Total depth 79 ft. Cased to 79 ft. Date of test Static water level Well production FROM WELL LOG 7/30/82 72 ft. 15 g.p.m. WATER SAMPLE RESULTS: Coliform 0 colonies/100 mL Nitrate .565 mg/L Arsenic N/D ug/L Date of sample: 3/26/14 B. SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK DATA Tank Type/Material Septic/Steel Well Log (Y/N) Wires properly protected (Y/N) Casing height (above ground) AT INSPECTION 3/28/14 75.3 ft. 2.7 g.p.m. Y Y >12 Collected by: Anderson Engrg. Date installed 1982** in. Tank size 1,000 gal. Number of Compartments 2 Cleanouts (YIN) Y Foundation cleanout (Y/N) N Depression over tank (Y/N) N High water alarm (Y/N) N Date of pumping 3/25/2014 Pumper A Plus Horne Services *Cleanout Inside Foundation Wall in Crawlspace **No Record of Installation. Permit Issued in 1982. C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA Date installed 10/88** Soil rating (g.p.d./ft2 or ft2/bdrm) 1.2GPD/SF System type Bed Length 70 ft. Width 7 ft. Gravel below pipe 1 ft. Total depth 5-6 ft Eff: absorption area 560 ft' Monitoring tube Y Depression over field N Date of adequacy test 3/28/14 Results (Pass/Fail) Pass For 3 bedrooms Fluid depth in absorption field before test 4.5 in. Water added 476 gal. New depth 7.3 in. Elapsed Time: 46 min. Final fluid depth 4.5 in. Absorption rate >= 450 g.p.d. Any rejuvenation treatment (past 12 mo.) (Y/N & type) N **Put On Line 10/7/1996. Originally Constructed 10/20/1988. If yes, give date D. LIFT STATION Date installed 7/11/87 Size in gallons 500 "Pump on" level at in. "Pump off' level at in. Datum Bottom of Tank Cycles tested 3 E. SEPARATION DISTANCES WELL ON LOT TO: Septic tank/lift station on lot Absorption field on lot Public sewer main Sewer /septic service line >25' Animal containment areas >50' 75'*** 95'*** N/A Manhole/Access (Y/N) ' High water alarm level at in. Meets alarm & circuit requirements? Y On adjacent lots >100' On adjacent lots >100' Public sewer manhole/cleanout Holding tank N/A Manure/animal excrete storage areas >100' N/A SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK ON LOT TO: Building foundation >5' Property line >5' Water main >10Water service line Wells on adjacent lots >100' ABSORPTION FIELD ON LOT TO: Property line 1,*** Water Service line >10' Surface water >100' Curtain drain None NotedWells on adjacent lots >100' >10' Absorption field Surface water >5' >100' Building foundation >10' Water main N/A F. COMMENTS ***Waivers Issued Allowing Encroachments. Driveway, parking/vehicle storage >10' G. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION 1 certify that 1 have determined through field inspections and review of Municipal records that the above systr s are in conformance with MOA COSA guidelines in effect c : ;is date. Engineer's Printed Name Michael E. Andersor, ?.E. Date 4/3/14 COSA brown sheet_10-1412.doc &.i• B�`i4, ,�, ® V•;� P IA * Osseo eeeeeeee •Ont.. .......- �?• MICHAEL E. ANDERSON = 1 • CE -4381 ®°t�ovV��y"� Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department Building Safety Division On -Site Water & Wastewater Program 4700 Bragaw Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage. AK 99519-6650 www.muni.orgfonsite (907) 343-7904 er=tL v+a^'c.E CERTIFICATE OF ON—SITE SYSTEMS" APPROVAL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING Parcel I.D. OPO -09-1- COSA# 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Complete legal description DELAK'S 5/0; LOT 126 Location (site address) Current Property owner(s) p0289 Expiration Date: a! I — - 07 SAWMILL ROAD, BIRD CREEK JEFF McDONALD Mailing address HC 52 BOX 8502 Lending agency Mailing address Real Estate Agent Mailing address Day phone 783-0366 Day phone Day phone Unless otherwise requested, COSA will be held by DSD for pickup. 2. NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 3. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: Individual Well Individual Water Storage Community Class Well Public Water System TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL.: Individual On-site ❑ Individual Holding tank ❑ Community On-site ❑ Public Sewer • The Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department (DSD) Issues Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval (COSA) based only upon the representations given in paragraph 4 by an independent professional civil engineer registered in the State of Alaska. Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval are required for the transfer of title (except between spouses) for properties served by a single-family on-site wastewater disposal and/or water supply system. DSD also issues COSAs upon request to homeowners. Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval are valid for 90 days from the date of issue for properties served by a private or Class C well and may be reissued with new water samples. (Certificates may be reissued for a period of up to one year with valid water samples.) Certificates are valid for one year for properties served by Class A or B wells or a public water system. The Municipality of Anchorage Is not responsible for errors or omissions In the professional engineer's work. 4. STATEMENT OF INSPECTION BY ENGINEER As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, l verify that my investigation, based on procedures outlined in the Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval Guidelines for this application, shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is (are) safe, functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. l further verify that based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is(are) in compliance with all applicable Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of installation. Name of Firm GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. Phone '337-6179 Address 3701 E. TUDOR ROAD, SUITE 101 • ANCHORAGE, AK 99507 Engineer's Printed Name JEFFREY A. GARNESS, P.E. Engineer's Comments: In conducting this evaluation, GEG, LtD. attempted to provide a thorough, conscientious engineering analysis of the system in accordance with ADEC and MOA DSD Guidelines B Regulations. The reported results described the performance of the system under the conditions encountered at the time of the test, and separation distances measured lo readily Identifiable features. The operational life of all wells and septic systems depend on the local soils condition, groundwater levels that may fluctuate during the year, and the water usage of the family being served by the system. These conditions are outside the control of the evaluator of the system. Satisfactory test results do not guarantee future performance of the system, nor do they guarantee that there are no hidden defects or encroachments. GEG, LTD. can therefore not provide any warranty or future estimate of how long the system will continue to meet the operational requirements of the ADEC or MOA DSD. The content of this report Is for the sole benefit of the owner listed above. Any reliance upon or use of this report by any other person or party Is not authorized, nor will it confer any legal right whatsoever. 5. DSD SIGNATURE Approved for bedrooms. Disapproved. Conditional approval for Datet- goo�4p.. v QF /• sm1 Q • D 7 J r: y A. ornessi vohte 79/3 goo aoe, ./. ). o��eor Q pro/esstone`v� ��000t�`�t�t«rrnf,i bedrooms, with the filowing stipulations: kkLk �SY 9F44,1 JAG. ON-SITE •' �' WATER AND m" WASTEWATER PROGRAM : c k • pyo as• er‘Nz0 Attachments: COSA Checklist Septic System Advisory Well Flow Advisory Nitrate Advisory Arsenic Advisory Maintenance Agreements Supplemental Engineer's Reort Other (Rev. 11/05) Original Certificate Date: 8- -3-07 Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department Building Safety Division On -Site Water & Wastewater Program 4700 Bragaw Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 99519-6650 www.muni.org/onsite (907) 343-7904 CERTIFICATE OF ON-SITE SYSTEMS APPROVAL CHECKLIST Legal Description. DELAK'S S/D; LOT 128 Parcel ID: 010 — 0 a.I - Li? A. WELL DATA Well typePa If A, B, or C provide PWSID# N/A WeII Log (Y/N) YES Date completed 7/30/1982 Sanitary seal (Y/N) YES Wires properly protected (Y/N) YES Total depth 79 ft. Cased to 79 ft Casing height (above ground) 12+ in. FROM WELL LOG AT INSPECTION Date of test 7/30/1982 5/31/2006 Static water level 72 ft. 76 ft Well production 15 g.p.m. 2.92 g.p.m. WATER SAMPLE RESULTS: Conform 0 colonies/100 mi. Nitrate 0.673 mg./L. Other bacteria 0 colonies/100 ml. Arsenic: cO.15 ug./L. Date of sample: 7/17/2007 Collected by: SEG Ltd. B. SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK DATA • INSIDE CRAWLSPACE Tank TypelMateriai STEEL Date installed 1982? Tank size 1000 gal. Number of Compartments UNK Cleanouts (Y/N) YES Foundation cleanout (WN) "YES Depression over tank (Y/N) NO Date of pumping 5/26/2006 Pumper C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA a PER MOA RECORDS Date installed •+1997 Soil rating (g.p.d./ft'or /bdrn 1.2 Length 70 ft. Width 7 ft. High water alarm (Y/N) YES DENALI System type TRENCH Gravel below pipe 1.0 ft. Total depth 3.9 +/—ft. Eff. absorption area 560 ft2 Monitoring tube YES Depression over field NO Date of adequacy test 5/31/2006 Results (Pass/Fail) PASS For 3 bedrooms Fluid depth in absorption field before test 0.5 In Water added 450 gal. New depth 14.5 in. Elapsed Time. 60 min. Final fluid depth 4_5 in. Absorption rate >= 450+ g.p.d. Any rejuvenation treatment (past 12 mo.) (Y/N & type) NONE KNOWN If yes, give date — D. LIFT STATION Date installed 10/20/1988 Size in gallons 500 "Pump on" level at 28 in. 'Pump oft" level at 28 in. Manhole/Access (Y/N) YES High water alarm level at 34 in. Datum BOTTOM OF TANK Cycles tested 3 Meets alarm & circuit requirements? YES E. SEPARATION DISTANCES SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM WELL ON LOT TO: Septic tank/lift station on lot Absorption field on lot Public sewer main 75' 100'+ N/A Sewer /septic service line 25'+ On adjacent lots On adjacent lots 100'+ 100'+ Public sewer manhole/deanout Holding tank N/A N/A Animal containment areas 50'+ Manure/animal excrete storage areas 100'+ SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK ON LOT TO: Building foundation 51+ Property line 5'+ Absorption field 5'+ Water main N/A Water service line 10'+ Surface water 100'+ Wells on adjacent lots 100'+ SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM ABSORPTION FIELD ON LOT TO: Property line 0' Building foundation 10'+ Water main N/A Water service line 10'+ Surface water 100'+ Driveway, parking/vehicle storage 10'+ Curtain drain F. COMMENTS NONE KNOWN Wells on adjacent lots 100'+ G. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION 1 certify that 1 have determined through field inspections and review of Municipal records that the above systems are in conformance with MOA COSA guidelines in effect on this date. Engineer's Printed Name Date "411/0? - JEFFREY A. GARNESS COSA Fee $ Date of Payment Receipt Number (Rev. 11/06) (My- lam' 04t'o05" 114 Waiver Fee $ Date of Payment Receipt Number Parcel I.D. 1. Municipality of Anchorage 51 Development Services Department Building Safety Division 1 On -Site Water & Wastewater Program L 4700 Bragaw Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 99519-6650 www.munl.org/onsite (907) 343-7904 CERTIFICATE OF ON-SITE SYSTEMS APPROVAL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 090 -nll-,{q COSA# DID Da S9 - GENERAL INFORMATION Expiration Date: g -c2 - 0 7 Complete legal description Location (site address) Current Property owner(s) JEFF McDONALD Day phone Mailing address DELAK'S S/D; LOT 12B SAWMILL ROAD, BIRD CREEK Lending agency Mailing address Real Estate Agent Mailing address HC 52 BOX 8502 • INDIAN, AK 99540-9601 783-0366 Day phone Day phone Unless otherwise requested, COSA will be held by DSD for pickup. 2. NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 3. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: Individual Well Individual Water Storage Community Class Well Public Water System • 0 TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL: Individual On-site Individual Holding tank Community On-site Public Sewer 0 The Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department (DSD) Issues Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval (COSA) based only upon the representations given in paragraph 4 by an independent professional civil engineer registered In the State of Alaska. Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval are required for the transfer of title (except between spouses) for properties served by a single-family on-site wastewater disposal and/or water supply system. DSD also issues COSAs upon request to homeowners. Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval are valid for 90 days from the date of issue for properties served by a private or Class C well and may be reissued with new water samples. (Certificates may be reissued for a period of up to one year with valid water samples.) Certificates are valid for one year for properties served by Class A or B wells or a public water system. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions in the professional engineer's work. 4. STATEMENT OF INSPECTION BY ENGINEER As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I venrovhl Guidelines for this application, fy that my investigation, based on procedures outlined in the Certificate of On -Site Systems App shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is (are) safe, functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. 1 further verify that based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is(are) In compliance with al! applicable Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of installation. Name of Firm GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP. Ltd. Address 3701 E. TUDOR ROAD. SUITE 101 " ANCHORAGE. AIC 99507 Engineer's Printed Name JEFFREY A. GARNESS. P.E. Engineer's Comments: In conducting this evaluation, GEG, LtD. attempted to provido a thorough, conscientious engineering analysis of the system in accordance with ADEC and MOA DSD Guidelines & Regulations. The reported results described the performance of the system under the conditions encountered at the time of the fest, and separation distances measured to readily Identifiable features. The operational lite of all wells and septic systems depend on the local soils condition, groundwater levels that may fluctuate during the year, and the water usage of the family being served by the system. These conditions are outside the control of the evaluator of the system. Satisfactory test results do not guarantee future performance of the system, nor do they guarantee that there are no hidden defects or encroachments. GEG, LTD. can therefore not provido any warranty or future estimate of how long the system will continue to meet the operational requirements of the ADEC or MOA DSD. The content of this report is for the ole benefit of the owner person or party Is not authorizedabo, nor reliancee. Any report by any will it confer any legal right whatsoever. other 5. DSD SIGNATURE �L Approved for _ bedrooms. Disapproved. Conditional approval for Phone Date 337-6179 L.i3olog oo600p04 e�OFA opo D ey �: ess: • 10 CE -7953 bedrooms, with the filowing stipulations: eyr'rofeselo�oo 0440000 oetOFf fA t, ON-SITE ••;41'0;_ WATER AN . ASTEWATER : c L PROGRAM J •• ENTSENdc\\\ Attachments: COSA Checklist Septic System Advisory Well Flow Advisory Nitrate Advisory By: OLV �. tr> (Rev. 11105) Arsenic Advisory Maintenance Agreements Supplemental Engineer's Reort Other Original Certificate Date: .5— -2 ' D 7 Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department Building Safety Division On -Site Water & Wastewater Program 4700 Bragaw Street P.O. Bax 196650 Anchorage, AK 995196850 www.muntarglonslte (907) 343-7904 CERTIFICATE OF ON-SITE SYSTEMS APPROVAL CHECKLIST Legal Description: A. WELL DATA Well type PRIVATE DELAK'S 5/0; LOT 128 Parcel ID: 090 - D.a/ -1719 If A, 8, or C provide PWSID# N/A Date completed 7/30/1962 Sanitary seal (Y/N) YES Total depth 79 ft Cased to 79 ft Date of test Static water level Well production FROM WELL LOG 7/30/1982 72 ft. 15 WATER SAMPLE RESULTS: Coliform 0 colonies/100 mi. Arsenic: kif) ug./L. B. SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK DATA Tank Type/Material gpm Well Log (Y/N) YES Wires properly protected (Y/N) Casing height (above ground) AT INSPECTION 5/31/2006 76 ft. 2.92 gpm YES 12+ in Nitrate 021 mg./L. Other bacteria 0 colonies/100 mi. Date of sample: 4/18/2007 Collected by' GEG Ltd. • INSIDE CRAWLSPACE STEEL Tank size 1000 gat Number of Compartments UNK Foundation cleanout (WN) *YES Depression over tank(Y/N) NO Date of pumping 5/26/2006 C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA Date installed "1937 Length 70 ft, Total depth 3.9 +/-ft. Eff. Pumper Date installed Cleanouts (Y/N) 1982? YES High water alarm (Y/N) YES DENALI •• PER MOA RECORDS Soil rating (g.p.d./ft2. i Width 7 1.2 absorption area 560 ft2 System type TRENCH ft. Gravel below pipe 1.0 ft. Monitoring tube YES Depression over field Date of adequacy test 5/31/2006 Results (Pass/Fail) PASS For 3 bedrooms Fluid depth in absorption field before test 0`5 in. Water added 450 gal New depth 14.5 in. Elapsed Time: 60 min. Final fluid depth 4_5 in, Absorption rete >= 450+ g.p.d. Any rejuvenation treatment (past 12 mo.) (Y/N & type) NONE KNOWN If yes, give date - NO D. UFT STATION YES Date Installed 10/20/1988 Size in gallons 500 Manhole/Access (Y/N) "Pump on level at 28 in. 'Pump oflm level at 28 in. High water alarm level at 34 in. Datum BOTTOM OF TANK Cycles tested 3 Meets alarm & circuit requirements? YES E. SEPARATION DISTANCES 11C Pf42- hibA 1-20tort-DS SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM WELL ON LOT TO: 1001+ Septic tank/lift station on lot 75' On adjacent lots 100'+ On adjacent lots 100'+ Absorption field on lot N/A Public sewer main N/A Public sewer manhole/deanout tank N/A Holding Sewer !septic service line 25'+100'+ Animal containment areas 50'+ Manure/animal excrete storage areas SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK ON LOT TO: Building foundation 51+ Property line 5'+ Absorption field 51+ Water main N/A Water service line 10'+ Surface water 1001+ Wells on adjacent lots 100'+ SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM ABSORPTION FIELD ON LOT TO: Property line 0' Building foundation 10'+ Water main N/A Water service line 10'+ Surface water 100'+ Driveway, parking/vehide storage Wells on adjacent lots 100'+ Curtain drain NONE KNOWN F. COMMENTS 10'+ G. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION 1 certify that 1 have determined through field inspections and review of Municipal records that the above systems are in conformance with MOA COSA guidelines in effect on this date. Engineefs Printed Name JEFFREY A. GARNESS Date 41/30/°* COSA Fee $ Waiver Fee $ Date of Payment Date of Payment Receipt Number Receipt Number (Rev. 11/05) Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department Building Safety Division On -Site Water & Wastewater Program 4700 Bragaw Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 99519-6650 www.muni.org/onsite (907) 343-7904 CERTIFICATE OF ON—SITE SYSTEMS APPROVAL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING Parcel I.D. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Complete legal description DELAK'S S/D: LOT 12B COSA# Rico? Expiration Date: 9 -2 a - 0 (, Location (site address) SAWMILL ROAD, BIRD CREEK Current Property owner(s) Mailing address Lending agency Mailing address Real Estate Agent Mailing address JEFF McDONALD Day phone 783-0366 HC 52 BOX 8502 T OIAI.14 pr({ GhSZ10.9.40l Day phone Day phone Unless otherwise requested, COSA will be held by DSD for pickup. 2. NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 3. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: Individual Well Individual Water Storage Community Class Well Public Water System TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL: Individual On-site Individual Holding tank Community On-site Public Sewer The Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department (DSD) Issues Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval (COSA) based only upon the representations given In paragraph 4 by an Independent professional civil engineer registered in the State of Alaska. Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval are required for the transfer of title (except between spouses) for properties served by a single-family on-site wastewater disposal and/or water supply system. DSD also issues COSAs upon request to homeowners. Certificates of On -Site Systems Approval are valid for 90 days from the date of Issue for properties served by a private or Class C well and may be reissued with new water samples. (Certificates may be reissued for a period of up to one year with valid water samples.) Certificates are valid for one year for properties served by Class A or B wells or a public water system. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions in the professional engineer's work. 4. STATEMENT OF INSPECTION BY ENGINEER As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I verify that my investigation, based on procedures outlined in the Certificate of On -Site Systems Approval Guidelines for this application, shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is (are) safe, functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. I further verify that based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is(are) in compliance with all applicable Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of installation. Name of Firm GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. Address 3701 E. TUDOR ROAD, SUITE 101 • ANCHORAGE, Al< 99507 Engineer's Printed Name JEFFREY A. GARNESS, P.E. Engineer's Comments: In conducting this evaluation, GEG, LtD. attempted to provide a thorough, conscientious engineering analysis of the system In accordance with ADEC and MOA DSD Guidelines & Regulations. The reported results described the performance of the system under the conditions encountered at the time of the test, and separation distances measured to readily identifiable features. The operational life of all wells and septic systems depend on the local soils condition, groundwater levels that may fluctuate during the year, and tho water usage of the family being served by the system. These conditions are outside the control of the evaluator of the system. Satisfactory test results do not guarantee future performance of the system, nor do they guarantee that there are no hidden defects or encroachments. GEG, LTD. can therefore not provide any warranty a future estimate of how long the system will continue to meet the operational requirements of the ADEC a MOA DSD. The content of this report is for the sole benefit of the owner listed above. Any reliance upon a use of this report by any other person or party is not authorized, nor will it confer any legal right whatsoever. 5. DSD SIGNATURE Approved for 3 bedrooms. Disapproved. Conditional approval for Attachments: COSA Checklist Septic System Advisory Well Flow Advisory Nitrate Advisory Phone 337-6179 Date bedrooms, with the fllowing stipulations: Arsenic Advisory Maintenance Agreements Supplemental Engineer's Reort Other By: YY/��/ LI. /"O Original Certificate Date: 6-22-0g 'Pre 1111M1 Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department Building Safety Division Onsite Water & Wastewater Program 4700 Bregaw Street P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 995196650 www.muni.org/orroMe . (907) 3437904 CERTIFICATE OF ON-SITE SYSTEMS APPROVAL CHECKLIST Legal Description: DELAK'S S/D; LOT 12B Parcel ID: Q 1 O -0.21- 49 A. WELL DATA Well type PRIVATE If A, 8, or Crovide PWSID# N/A P Well Log (Y/N) YES Date completed 7/30/1982 Sanitary seal (Y/N) YES Wires properly protected (Y/N) YES Total depth 79 ft. Cased to 79 ft. Casing height (above ground) 12+ in FROM WEU. LOG AT INSPECTION Date of test 7/30/1982 5/31/2006 Static water level 72 ft, 76 ft. Weft production 15 fl P m 2.92 flPm WATER SAMPLE RESULTS: Coliform O colonies/100 ml. Nitrate Liii mg./L. Other bacteria 0 colonies/100 ml. Arsenic: Nn ugJL. Date of sample: 5/31/2006 Collected by: GEG Ltd. B. SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK DMA • INSIDE CRAMISPACE Tank Type/Material STEEL Date Installed 1982? Tank size 1000 gal Number of Compartments UNK Cleanouts (Y/N) YES Foundation cleanout (Y/N) 'YES Depression over tank (Y/N) NO Date of pumping SS/r1 C / O C Pumper /9ern High water alarm (Y/N) YES C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA in PER Mous RECORDS Date installed ••1987 Soil rating (g.p.dJft'ori; 1.2 System type TRENCH Length 70 ft. Width 7 ft. Gravel below pipe 1.0 ft. Total depth 3.9 +/—ft. Eft. absorption area 560 ft' Monitoring tube YES Depression over field NO Date of adequacy test 5/31/2006 Results (Pass/Fail) PASS For 3 bedrooms Fluid depth in absorption field before test 0_5 in Water added450 gal New depth 14.5 in. Elapsed Time: 60 min. Final fluid depth 4_5 h. Absorption rate >= 450+ gpd Any rejuvenation treatment (past 12 mo.) (Y/N & type) NONE KNOWN If yes, give date D. UFT STATION YES Date installed 10/20/1988 Site in gallons Manhole/Access (YIN) "Pump on" level at 28 in. "Pump ofr level at 28 in. High water alarm level at 34 in. Datum BOTTOM OF TANK Cycles tested 3 Meets alarm & circuit requirements? YES E. SEPARATION DISTANCES f`+� f?�t o/2DS SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM WELL ON LOT TO: * 100 + Septic tank/lift station on lot —ill '— On adjacent lots 4 1001+ On adjacent kits 100 + Absorption field on lot N/A Public sewer main N/A Public sewer manhole/deanouf tank N/A Sewer /septic service line 25'+ Ho1001+ Animal containment areas 50'+ Manure/animal excrete storage areas SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK ON LOT TO: Building foundation 51+ Property line 5'+ Absorption field 5'+ Water main N/A Water service line 101+ Surface water 1001+ Wells on adjacent lots 100'+ SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM ABSORPTION FIELD ON LOT TO: N/A Property line 0' Building foundation 10'+ Water main 10'+ Surface water 100'+ Water service line Curtain drain NONE KNOWN F. COMMENTS Wells on adjacent lots 100'+ G. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION 1 certify that I have determined through field inspections and review of Municipal records that the above systems are in conformance with MOA COSA guidelines in effect on this date. Engineer's Printed Name Date 6/$f%e4 JEFFREY A. GARNESS Driveway, panting/vehicle storage 10'+ COSA Fee $ `flti Date of Payment x//9/04 Receipt Number 59 74 (Rev. 11105) Waiver Fee $ Date of Payment Receipt Number •0. LOT 12C o•st%06? p //Pi 49113 •R% VA VA V Dav M. Dreyer t� ' LS -10392• Or p••••......... ,o 4MOproyes 7 na Vcr pczar 400oo�0 anaewCD en GEORGE McCOY with PRUDENTIAL JACK WHITE / EXCLOSON NOTES: It Is the owner? responsibility to,determine the existence 01 ony easements. covenants. or restrictions which do not oppeor on the recorded subdivision plot. NOTE: Under no circumstances should ony data construction or for establishing hereon be used la hing property lines. LAND & CONSTRUCTION SURVEYORS—PLANNERS—ENGINEERS 440 WEST BENSON BLVD. 1 103 (fox) 561-6626 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 (907) 562-5291 WORK ORDER NUMBER:DAR: rc RAT MPHR APr. i 2001 sr I 1'M30 74-166 itaA eW oxalo e. cRo wuvecA 9oox WAcc: WPJ. DMD 4660 510/26 2001-L-529 SURVEY CERTWICATION: LANTECN has conducted physical survey of this property as shown an this drawing and thot the Improvements situated there- on ore within the property lines and no encroach- ments exist Other than noted. AS—BUILT OF': LEGAL OEScR1PPON: LEGEND: SET ENI 5/e•RB W/CAPOe 5/e' RB 125' ALMON. 0 MONUMENT E Hut ! TAcX L7 rENGE- —x— X — OVERNANG- wadD DECKS- 1 CONCRETE- 1 • - ASPHALT- I _. GRAVEL- SEPnc sTANOPVE WATER WELLttEl - LOT 12B DELAK'S ADDITION Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department Building Safety Division OnSite Water & Wastewater Program 4700 South Bragaw St. P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, AK 99519-6650 www.d.anchorage.ak.us (907) 343-7904 CERTIFICATE OF HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, HAMN 4 /O i ?p S Expiration Date: Parcel I.D 090-021-49 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Complete legal description DELAKS SUBDIVISION: LOT 128 Location (site address or directions) SAWMILL ROAD, BIRD CREEK Current Property owner(s) Mailing address Lending agency Day phone Mailing address Real Estate Agent GEORGE McCOY w/ PRUDENTIAL JACK WHiTE Day phone 783-2937 Mailing address LANCE & JUDITH NOWLAND Day phone Unless otherwise requested, HAA will be held by DSD for pickup. 2. NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 2 3. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: Individual Well Individual Water Storage Community Class Well Public Water System • TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL: Individual On-site Individual Holding tank Community On-site Public Sewer The Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department (DSD) Issues Certificates of Health Authority Approval (HAA) based only upon the representations given in paragraph 5 by an independent professional civil engineer registered in the State of Alaska. Certificates of Health Authority Approval are required for the transfer of title (except between spouses) for properties served by a single family on-site wastewater disposal and/or water supply system. DSD also issues HAAs upon request to homeowners. Certificates of Health Authority Approval are valid for 90 days from the date of issue for properties served by a private or Class C well and may be reissued with new water sample results Tess than 30 days old. (Certificates may be reissued for a period of up to one year with valid water samples.) Certificates are valid for one year for properties served by Class A or B wells or a public water system. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions In the professional engineer's work. Note: Alaska Water and Wastewater Consultants, Inc. shall be paid $1,345.00 at, or prior to closing for the engineering services provided. 4. STATEMENT OF INSPECTION BY ENGINEER As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I verify that my Investigation, based on procedures outlined In the Health Authority Approval Guidelines for this application, shows that the on-site water sunny and/or wastewater disposal system Is(are) safe, functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure Indicated herein. I further verify that based on the Information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and Inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system Is(are) In compliance with all applicable Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time of Installation. Name of Finn AKA WATER & WASTEWATER CONSULTANTS, INC. Address 6901 DEBARR ROAD. SURE 28 • ANCHORAGE, AK 99504 Engineer's Printed Name JEFFREY A. CARNESS, P.E. Engineer's Comments: In conducting this evaluation, AMC, Inc. attempted to provide a thorough, conscientious engineering analysis of the system In accordance with ADEC and MOA DSD Guidelines & Regulations. The reported results described the performance of the system under the conditions encountered at the time of the test, and separation distances measured to readriy Identifiable features. The operational We of all wells and septic systems depend on the local soils condition, groundwater levels that may fluctuate during the year, and the water usage of the family being served by the system. These conditions are outside the control of the evaluator of the system. Satlsfactory test results do not guarantee future performance of the system, nor do they guarantee that there are no hidden defects or encroachments. AWWC, Inc. can therefore not provide any warranty or future estimate of how long the system will continue to meet the operational requirements of the ADEC or MOA DSD. The content of this report Is for the sole benefit of the owner listed above. Any reliance upon or use of this report by any other person or parry is not authorized, nor will R confer any legal right whatsoever. 5. DSD SIGNATURE Approved for a bedrooms. Disapproved. Conditional approval for Phone 337-6179 Date 9A/f kkkvtkTgVtitcci bedrooms, with the flowing stipulations:.... ' I'D';% . ONSITE . t WATCrc AND ill WASTEWATER • 34j • 'JIJI�'4911))11 Attachments: HAA Checklist Septic System Advisory Well Flow Advisory Manitenance Agreements Supplemental Engineer's Recut Other a/�dO (FW. 17)00) Original Certificate Date' ¶— % %— 0 / Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department Building Safety Division On$lte Water & Wastewater Program 4700 South Bragaw St. P.O. Box 196850 Anchorage, Alt 995194850 www.d.anchorage.ak us (907)3434904 HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL CHECKLIST Legal Description: DELAKS SUBDIVISION: LOT 12B Parcel ID: 090-021-49 A. WELL DATA wen type MATE If A. B. or C provide PWSIDI# N A Well Log (YIN) YES Date completed 7/30/1982 Sanitary seal (YIN)YES Wires properly protected (Y/N) YES Total depth79 t Cased to 79 t Casing height (above ground) 12+ In. FROM WELL LOO AT INSPECTION Date of test 7/30/1982 8/23/2001 Static water level 72 t 75 ft. Well production 15 g.p.m. 3.5 g p.m. WATER SAMPLE RESULTS: Conform 0 colonies/100 mL Nitrate 0.546 mgJL Other bacteria 2 colonies/100 ml. Date of sample: 8/23/2001 Corrected by: AWWC. INC. B. SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK DATA SIN CRAWLSPACE Tank Type/Material STEEL Date installed 1982? Tank size 1000 Number of Compartments UNK Cieanouts (YIN) YES Foundation cleanout (Y/N)' S Depression over tank (Y/N) NO High water alarm (Y/N) YES Date of pumping ci -( (n f• v t Pumper A+ HOME/SERVICES C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA►A 5 Iq1910fkr" nnOA gnnzis Date Installed tlttt Son rating r.p4 ,orl'/bdrm) 1.2 Sysbun type TRENCH Length 70 ft Wk191 7 t Gravel below pipe 1.0 t Total depth 3.9�/—tt. Ett absorption areaa rt' Monitoring WO TES Depression over fell NO Dei° Of adequacy test 8/23/2001 Results (P ail) PASS Fc 2 brooms Fluid depth In absorption field before test_g_ In. Water added 759 gal. New depth 6 in. Elapsed Time: 6 min. Final fluid depth U In. Absorption rate >• 300+ g p.d. Any rejuvenation treatment (past 12 mo.) (Y/N & type) NONE KNOWN B yes, give date — D. LIFT STATION Ante installed 10/20/88 Size In gallons 500 "Pump on' level t 28 in. Pump off' level at28 ln. Datum BOTTOM OF TANK E. SEPARATION DISTANCES SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM WELL ON LOT TO: Manhole/Access (YIN) YES High water alarm level at 34 Cycles tasted 3 Meets alarm & circuit requirements? Septic tankiuf station on lot Absorption field on lot 75' or la:/ -1- O'tr Public sewer main N/A Sewer /septic service line 25'+ mac. On adjacent lots On adjacent lots 100'+ YES 10O'+ Public sewer manhole/deanout N/A Holding tank N/A SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK ON LOT TO: Building foundation 5'+ Property line 5'+ Absorption field 5'+ Water main N/A Water service line 10'+ Surface water 100'+ Wells on adjacent lots 100'+ SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM ABSORPTION FIELD ON LOT TO: Property One 0' Building foundation 10'+ Water main N/A Water servlae line 101+ Surface water 100'+ Driveway. parldng/vehide storage Curtain drain NONE KNOWN F. COMMENTS G. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION Wells on adjacent lots 100'+ 1 certify that 1 have determined through field inspections and review of Murudpai records that the above systems are In conformance wfh MOA HAA guidelines to effect on this date. Engineer's Pdntod e�% Date q �i JEFFREY A. GARNESS 25'4- G. 5'+ HAA Fee $ 30e) . ao Date of Payment 9/L0/0 Receipt Number 9'8 4g9' (Rev. 12/00) Waiver Fee S Date of Payment Receipt Number , APPLIC"r 4T FILLS OUT UPPER HAIL ONLY , Property Owner 5 (g A, it 0'71!3 1J A -z ire Mailing Address �< %/ G-- /r1 r,-.. J.i r 4 Zip Code 414,5-6 z _�7' Phone 'Gs =,,�.rr Buyer/lia.t (C.�_ f Address Zip Code Lending Institution k Address Zip Code Phone Realty Co. & Agent E5—M r 0. a>^QY f3Clm v Address 72 Ji c / STjv ( rot ffe ./�,, or. LI, zip Code 9f9 Co) Phone -, g7; -05-7) t i9 4c Legal Description 1-'1-l2 5 Da.l ck kf�� .L ¢-i:-7. Street Locatl �/,° •� ; Li ?nom [1. ? Type of Residence (]Single Family .,A 2 ((�] Multiple Family No. of Bedrooms Inspector T/5 O Other Water Supply PI Individual R ab433� -r ' /�� -4�• O Community LLD/ / l (.C.-Lz f�Y1 . b O Public Utility ATTACH WELL LOG. A well tog Is required for all wells drilled since June 1975. For wells clotted prior to that date. give well depth (attach log 11 available). Sewer Disposal ,BT Individual O Public Utility O Holding Tank Year Individual Installed' When Corrected to Public Utility. MUNIC PALITY OF ANCHORAGE . 44(m. - DFPT C• Fc • 11:1 P- ENVIRi:U.::tI.A.:..U.p`_rU� ION lI t.l: 1 Q 19a2. RECEIVED NOTE: THE INSPECTION FEE MUST ACCOMPANY EACH REQUEST BEFORE PROCESSING CAN BE INITIATED. ilGrd. �1.: Time Time Time Time nt ACA ri t Ai', A Date Date Date Date 1'a. -Aft -4'.'1 n\ Y1 Inspector Inspector Inspector Inspector Field Notes: r L r. ) -LLA C unk 41e241Ia LA.. [l1 -+‘..n. L1.i r , -t_ i, ,_ _ U� t..4 .p % a,- .-4..... K- MUNIC PALITY OF ANCHORAGE . 44(m. - DFPT C• Fc • 11:1 P- ENVIRi:U.::tI.A.:..U.p`_rU� ION lI t.l: 1 Q 19a2. RECEIVED ate:kat I c., r 'rj iiatit ,-- ft ( 24 -APPROVED BEDROOMS ( ) DISAPPROVED ( ) CONDITIONAL APPROVAL' DATE _-''-'3' 'CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY. Sons Rating Date Sewer Installed Well To Absorption Area Well to Tank Well Log Received Septic Tank Size 72423 13,121 ALASKA alk011M611TAL COflTROL SEI uICCS, If1C. Engineering & Enuiranmental Studies 2/17/83 JAY FRAZIER BOX 8644 ANCHORAGE AK 99504 SELLER — JAY FRAZIER BUYER—LANCE HOWLAND SUBDIVISION—DELAK ADDITION BLOCK -0 LOT -12B ADEQUACY TEST FOR SEWER SYSTEM THE TYPE OF ABSORPTION SYSTEM IS A UNKNOWN WITH AN UNKNOWN AREA. THE SYSTEM IS CAPABLE OF ACCEPTING 300 GALLONS OF WATER PER DAY. THE SURGE CAPACITY OF THE SYSTEM IS 600 GALLONS. BASED UPON THE TEST DATA THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTABLE FOR A 2 BEDROOM HOME. THE SEPTIC TANK WAS PUMPED ON 2/11/83 . SEPTIC TANK ADEQUACY THE EXISTING SEPTIC TANK VOLUME OF 1000 IS ADEQUATE FOR THIS 2 BEDROOM HOUSE. .�\!1 _ 1 1 —7 OF.AC t1 v�CQ�••...«• •,•• •4+491 Cs). Po One O19T eaORo•eiid , Jr. t,,/ 4,1- 1E .•icy r aeA ..fl.• ll(PiieFa4 1200 West 33rd Avenue. Suite B • Anchorage. Alaska 99503 • (907) 276-1361