The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCAMPBELL HEIGHTS BLK 2 LT 10BI0 GI~6,TER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROI~'~,H " ! ~ HEALTH DEPARTMENT ' ( ~ 77 3., EAGLE INSPECTION REPORT ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SEPTIC TANK: LEGAL MAILING ADDRESS ,~.~::~,~'~ .-.'~""~'"'~-~-/,~'~'-- ' DISTANCE FROM WELL LIQUID CAPACITY NUMBER OF / MATERIAL ...-~",,,~'",~'~-' COMPARTMENTS LIQUID GALLONS. INSIDE LENGTH INSIDE WIDTH. ~DEPIH SEEPAG.~E SYSTEM.. SEEPAGE PIT: I'%EAREST LOT LINF TOIAL EF IVE ABSORPIION AREA (WALL AREA) SQ. FT. TILE DRAIN FIELD: DISTANCE FROM WELL ./,..~/ w NUMBER OF LINES ~ ABSORPTION AREA .,'.,'~,,,=~ ~ DEPTH: TOP OF TILE TO FINISH GRADE TOTAL ,. FOUNDATION ,~ ~-/'~/~- , NEAREST LOT LINE_/D '~ . OF LINES DISTANCE BETWEEN LINES ~' ~ d TRENCH WIDTH ~ / IN. TOTAL EFFECTIVE SQ. FL LENGIH OF EACH LINE / ~ /~ / ~~ / DEPTH OF FILTER MATERIAL BENEATH TILE ,~ ~N. ABOVE TILF ~ // W E L L: .,.w'~-~.,.~/_.,,~.,~'.z.,-~ ~PE ~~ DEPTH NEAREST ~ LOT LINE ~ , SEWER LINE ~ DISTANCE FROM WATER . BUILDING FOUNDATION ,~ · _SA/v~PLE ~ NEAREST SEPTIC '" SEEPAGE / OTHER TANK //~ j SYSTEM /"~/ . CESSPOOl g"'"' , SOURCES~-'"'- DISTANCES: DIAGRAM OF SYSTEM DAIE ~ APPROVED~ GAAB-UD-2 GREATEF~tNCHORAGE AREA r'~,ROUGH c,.,o.?~// IIEALTI! DEPARTMENT ' 327 ~gle St. Anchorage, A~ 99501 SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM - APPLICATION~:& PERMIT APPLICATION TO INSTALL: SE~ICTANK~,{E~AG~P~T__,DR~IN FJE~D t~ ,OTHER ' BELOWTO BE FILLED OUT B~-HEALTH DEPARtS{Nm ......... ,,,s ,s ,o SERVE AS . FER,,,T ,0 ,,~,*,, * DIAGRAM OF SYSTEM DISTANCES: I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of Greater Anchorage Area Borough Ordinance No. 28-68 and that the above described system is in accordance with said code. HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL iNDIVIDUAL WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PART I.--TO BE COMPLETED BY FHA INSURING O~FICE Anchorage MORTGAGOR OR SPONSOR Roy Newbold I -4 2 WATER SUPPLY BYz [] Public system SEWAGE DISPOSAL [] Public system MORTGAOEE SERIAL/,40. Matanuska Valley Bank 111-011857-203 PROPERTY ADDRESS xxxxxxSpruce, Anchora§e, Alaska BLOCK NO. LOT NO. i (If Yes, ~ow SYSTEM DESIRED ~ ~uni~ system ~ Individual ~. o~,*,~, o*,~o, ~ ~mmunity system ~ Individual ~ Y~ ~ No PART II.--TO BE COMPLETED BY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR'S SKETCH REPORT OF INSPECTIONtlNDIVIDUAL SEWAGE-DISPOSAL SYSTEM PI~IMARY TREATMENT consists of [] S~ptlc tank. [] Cesspool. Distance from well, Total liquid capacity, Inside length Cesa~eeh Distance from: feet. Material,. Number of compartments .gallons. Capadty inlet compartment, gallons. feet. Inside width feet. Liquid delxh, feet. fee~; foundation, feet; nearest Im line at [] front, [] side, [] rear, feet. S~¢CNdDARY TREATMINT consists of [] Tile disposal field. [] Seepage pits. Other Distance from: Well, f~; foun~ti~, f~; n~ I~ l~e at ~ f~n~ ~ side, To~l len~h of tile lines f~t. Numar of lin~, Distance ~w~n lin~, Trench ~idth. inches. Tot~ eff~ve abm~tion a~a in ~ttom of trench,. ~ngrh of ~ch line. f~. De,h. top of tile to finish gnde. square feet. inches. Type of filter material: [] Gravel. [] Broken stone. Other. Depth of filter material beneath tile., inches. Depth of filter material over tile, Number of pits Outside diameter, feet. Depth,. feet. Lining material Distance from: Well,. feet; building foundation, feet; neatese lot line at f-I front, [] side, [] k-ar, __ In~.peetlo~ made by~ [] State. [] County. [] Local ttealth Authority. Inspected by Date of inspection 19 feet. REPORT OF INSPECTION~INDIVIDUAL WATER-SUPPLY SYSTEM Distance to nearest public water main. feet. Size of main, inches. Individual wells [] ate [] are not customary in neighborhood. Give most recent tetord of failure of wells in immediate vicinity to furnish adequate supply of water Properties in neighborhood [] ate lq are not being developed with both individual water-supply and sewage-disposal systems. Lot size: feet wide feet deep. Dwelling set back from fiont property line feet Individual water supply from: [] Drilled well. [] Driven well. [] Dug well. [] Bored well. D~stance of well froml Building foundation, seepage pit. Well COnltr~¢flonl feet; tile sewer, .feet; cesspool, feet; nearest lot line at [] front, [] side, [] rem, feet; septic tank,, feet; disposal flelcL feet; otbet sources of possible pollution, feet. Diameter, inches. Total depth, feet. Type of casing. Approximate depth to pumping level of water in well feet. Approximate yield. Sealed watertight to depth of feet. Exterior space around casing sealed with: [] Cement grout. [] Puddled clay. [] Ordinary backfill. Well cover: [] Concr~e. [] Wood. [] bie~al. Openings in well cover watertight: [] Yes. [] No. Pump~ [] Shallow well. [] Deep well. Length of drop pipe, feet. Pump capacity.. Located in: [] Basement. [] Pumpaoorn off basement. [] Pumphouse above ground. [] Pump pit. Pumproorn properly drained: [] Yes. [] No. Pump mounting watertight: [] Yes. [] No. Type of stoeage: [] Pressure. [] Gravity. Capacity,. gallons. Has b~cterinlogical examination of water been made? [] Yet. [] NO. If answer is "},es," give date Quality of water [] is [] is r~t satisfactory for human consumption. Installation [] does [] docs not comply with approved exhibiu, if any. Inspection' made by: [] State. [] County. [] Local tlealth Authority. Inspected by Date of inspection , 19 Depth of casing, .gallons per minute. gallons per minute. (TI'RI) . ,19 fce~ feet; GREATER ANCHORAGE AREA BOROUGH Departme-t of Environmental Quality. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Cliff Judkins Director John Lee (~Fb~/'' Senior Env'~ronmental Specialist May 15, 1972 Daily News Article, "Resident Pumping Sewage Water To Prove a Point." Mrs. Reinders, the center of focus in the subject article, was cited to court by this Department as the result of a complaint filed by a neiqhbor, Robert Pierson, and after a warning citation had been issued by this Department. The fact that she had to be reported indicates to me that she was tryin~ to get away with what she was doing rather than committing the offense as a sort of protest. It would seem she would have notified this office and then have done the pumping if she was truly protesting. 'She indicates that she bought the duplex already built, financed by the FHA. On January 20, 1971, FHA Form 2573 was signed by this Department approving the sewer and water systems. The sewer system had been inspected by us on November 4, 1970 and consisted of a 1500 gallon septic tank and 168 feet of 3 foot wide drainfield based on a soil test figure of 140 square feet per bedroom. There was no indication of water in the drainfield at the time of the inspection. It has been reported that the bottoms of the septic tanks were perforated by Joe Williams but we have no record of this and this has no bearing on the problem. She says she complained to the Borough a year ago but we have no record of this or what the nature of her complaints were. This area is now in a service district which includes drainage which indicates that the Borough does plan to help but since this district was formed during the winter possible drainage problems cannot be cared for overnight. As to complaints to the FHA and to the developer bringing no results I can only say, what were the complaints? If the problems were relative to drainage what were they expected to do? C.P. Judkins Hay 15, 1972 Page 2 A statement is made in which it is said DEQ admitted that Mrs. Reinders had a problem and noted that the septic tanks had been improperly installed. This is not true! Our records indicate the sewer systems were properly installed. What we are tryin~ to get hold of the developer for is relative to the water supply and for this Joe Williams has been sent notice. We do admit that Mrs. Reinders-does have a problem and it is being caused by a hiqh water table and a poor drainage layout in this particular area. The Borough is serving their function by including this area in a roads and drainage district,"how- ever, and we cannot condone anyone pumping their sewer onto the surface of the ground even thouqh it is mixed with run off water. Mrs. Reinders plead innocent at her arraignment and if she is caught pumping out her system again we will cite her again and go for an injunction. bb August 22, 1973 I~ECEIVED AUG Z ~ 1973 ~1~ c Mr. S. R. Swett G~A~ANCMO~A~ AI~A ~ 3430 67th Ave. ,.' -~ Anchorage, Alaska 99504 N Re: Well Serving Lots 9A, 9B, 10A, 10B, A of Block 2, Campbell Heights Subdivision m Dear Mr. Swett: . * Mr. Rumfelt of the Dep~rtment of ~nvironmental Quality c has informed me that you have not made the zmprovements to your . L well set forth in Mr. Rumfelt's letter of June 26, 1973. As it E presently exists, the well in question is in violation of the ^ Alaska Administrative Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 2, Sub- N chapter 1, Paragraph 251(b), adopted by reference in Section 9-21 w of the Greater.Anchorage Area Borough Code of Ordinances. Your A failure to take the remedial action requested is endangering the v health of all who use the well. m '~ Thus, you are again asked t? comply with the ter~.s. ~f , Mr. Rumfelt's letter. If compliance zs not forthcoming: within two weeks from the date of this letter, the Borough may initiate A legal action. c Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. E A Sincerely, o /JoAn M. Katz /} M ~sistant Borough~Attorney U N J~:pa ! T v cc: Tim Rumfelt, Department of Environmental Quality