HomeMy WebLinkAboutMANN #2 Soils Information
Civil Engineers
R&M ENGli' ','r-'RING & GEOLOGIC/'r CONSULTANTS
229 EAST 51st. AVE. - P.O. I';OX 6087 - ANCtlORAGc,'ALASKA 99503
'[ELEPHOHE 907-279-0483 TELEX 000-35419
Geologists Land Surveyor~
3A~.'~ES W. ;lOONEY, P. E.
,~ALCO L~'.I A. N~ENZJES, P.E..
,lAMES H. ¥.'ELLMAN, P.E,
August 17, 1972
Mr. Arthur Mann
Loretta Street
/%nchorage, Alaska
RALPH R. IVIIGLIACC;O
R'& m No. 2sz2z . [o c c
RE: Subsurface Soll Investigation (For Sanitary System) Propose~l
Subdivision at 163rd/%venue and Golden View Drive
Dear Mr. Man~:
We are submlttin~ herewith our test borinE results and comments re-
£ardlr~ soil conditions encountered at the subject ske. This investi-
cation %~as performed in accordance %v{th your verbal request. The
procedures utilize& in this investigation were directed to identifying
soil characteristlc~ in accordance with those regdirements outlined
in a letter dated September 13, 1971 from Mr. Rpl~ Strlcldand o~ the
Greater/%nchor~-~ Area Borough, , Department o.~ Environmental
Quality.
;% total of four. (4) test holes were put down withL% the plattea area
for the purpose of definlna general subsurface soll conditions. The
borina locations aru Sh6wn on Drawing A-01 and their locations' are
approximate only. The borina locations were selected for the purpose
of defJnlna maior SOil units.
Dri111n[ was performed with a track-mounted "Mobil B-50" hydraulic
drlilln~ unit employin~ 6 inch diameter solid-stem augers. Samples
were recovered ~m representative strata and retained for labora-
tory testinE. Final logs for the test borings have been prepared and
are included on Drawing/%-02. Grain size analysis curves for selected
samples have also been plotted and are shown on Drawin~/%-03.
The genera/topography and geology indicates that the ~round surface
slopes to the northwest and borders swamp deposits desc-t'ibed by
Alii/er and Dobrovolny in Geological Survey Bulletin 1093. The south-
eastern portion of the property lles witl~n the lateral moraine area
also'descelbed in the above-mentioned builebin. Large surface exposed
boulders were prevalent ~n the area.
ANCIIORAGE FAIRBANKS JUNEAU
August 17, 1972
Mr. Arthu~ Marm
Page 2
Test IIoles Number 1 and 2 located at the common boundaries o~ Lots
7 and 8 and 5 and 6, respectively, showed peat extendln~ to a depth
of about 3 £ee~ underlain by medium dense uranular deposits. I~ was
no~ poss~le to de~e~e a depth ~9 a hydrostatic water table as the
-'pe~cheU~va~er~able ~n the pea~ s~ratum caused floo8~ o~ the holes.~
Tes~ Hole Number 4 was ~ou~ ~o ~ve abou~ L 5 fee~ o~ ~at a~ a
s~ perche~ water table conditions. Tes~ Itole Number 3 showe~
abou~ 5 fee~ o~ pea~ and was locatcO a~ a low ~in~ on the bounda~ be-
tween lots 3 and 4.
Underlyln~ the organic material in all test holes was a thin layer (up
to 2 feet thick) of s~Ity sand which extended to depths rart~ing ~rom
3. $ to 6. $ feet below ground surface. At these depths a l~ht'brown
to ~rray silty or ~ravelly sand (SAg) was encountered and continued to
the bottom of all bor~s except T.H. 1 where a sandy silt (ML) ',;as
found below a de~:h of ten feet. The borings were terminated at
depths of from 15 to 17. 5 feet below ~round surface.
We appreciate belr~, ~,: ~n this opportunity to be of service to you.
Should you have any euestions with regard to the above information,
please do not hesit~ .e to contact us.
Very truly yours,
R & M ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
~oone~/'~ ~
So~l Engineer
]%VR:wb
R&M ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL CONSULIANI'S
'DRAB
T.H.- $
8-15-~72
ORGANIC MATERIAL (PEAT)
SILT
W/SOME SAND, Light S~o~n
4.0'
~,¥D
AS
Dense
I0.0'
)io%
SANDY SILT TRACE GRAVEL
~ ML
17.5'
T.D
ORGANIC MAT ERIi,L i PEAT)
¸AD,
. 5.0'
SIL3'Y SAND W/SOME
PEBBLES Light Brow'~ . ,/ . '
SM
15.0'
ToD.
D-15-72
· ~ ORGANIC MATERIAL (PEAT)
~'~: SILTY SAND, Light B~own
!: "~
'q:~C GRAVELLY SAND TRACE
-~o
..~.:.
~' ~ SM
17.5'
T.D.
T.H.-4
8-15-72
ORGANIC MATERIAL (PEAT)
SAND W/SOME PEBBLES
GRAVELL:/SA D ,RACE
TO .SOME SILT
SM
I§.0'
T. Do
Proposed Subdivision Development
Authur Mann Property
L Engln3erlng E~ Geologlcal Consultants LOGS OF TEST BORINGS
^.c.oaAoe ,~lae~.e ALASKA ~.~^. Anchorage Alasl~a
162nd AVENUE
LOT NUMB&RS
~.H-$~~
I
,I
LOT
I
NUMBERS
5
6
T.H.-2
T. tl.-I
8
bJ
16;5 rd AVENUE
Note: Locations of fest hopes are approx., and hove not been surveyed.
Engineering ~ Geological Consultants
Proposed Subdivision Development
Aulhur Mann Property
LOCATIOI't OF BORINGS
Anchorage Alaska
SOl L3
CLASSI F[CATION~ cONSISTENCY AN D SYMBOLS
CI.A.qqlI'ICA'rlON.: Identification and classification oE the soll is accomplished in
accord,mc,, with the Unified Soll Classification System. Normally. the grain size
di,:ribution determines class~ication of the soil. The soil is defined according to
major ,,nd mLnor constituents with the minor elements serving as modifiers of the
ma~or elements. For cohesive soils, the clay becomes the principal noun with the
other major soil constituents used as modifier: i.e. silly clay, when the clay particles
are such that the clay dominates soil properties. Minor soil constituents may be
a&!ed to th.. classiZication breakdown in accordance with the particle size proportion
listed below; i.e. sandy silt w/some gravel, trace clay. ' ·
no call - 0 - 3% trace - 3 - 12% some - 13 - 30,%
SOIL CONSISTENCY - CRITERIA: Soll consistency as defined, below and determined
by normal field and laboratory methods applies only to non-frozen materbal. For
these materials, the influence of such factors as soil structure, i.e. fissure
systems, shrinkar, e cracks, sllckensides, etc., must be taken into consideration
in makLng any correlation with the consistency values listed below. In permafrost
Zones, the consistency and strength of frozen soils may v~-y significantly and
unex-plainably with ice content, thermal regime and soil type.
Coheslonless Cohesive,
N .'. (blows,'f' t)':lelat ire Density
Loose 0 - 10 0 to 40t,5
.~ledium Dense 10 - 30 40 to 70;~
Dense 30 - 60 70 to 90~
Very Dense - 60 90 to 100%
*Standard Penetration "N": Blows per foot of
a 1.t0-pound hammer falling 30 inches on a
2-inch OD split-spoon except where noted.
Very Soft
Soft
Firm
Very Firm
Hard
0 - 0.25
0.25 - 0.5
0. S - 1.0
1.0 - 2.0
2.0 - 4.0
-4.0
DRILLING SYMBOLS.
WO: Wash Out WD:
WL: Water Level BCR:
WCl: Wet Cave In ACR:
DCh Dry Cave in AB:
WS: While Sampling' 'TD:
%"nile Drilling
Before Casing Removal
After Casing Removal
After Boring
Total Depth
Note: Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the
hori~, at thd times indicated. In pervious unfrozen soils, the indicated elevations
are considered to represent actual ground water co~dltlons. La impervious mad
frozen soils, accurate determinations of ground water elevations cannot be obtained
wlth~n a ILmited period of observation and other e~dence on ground water elevations
ami conditions are requLred..
Enoln.erlm3
C~ Geological .C~..n~ultan,~
GLI~
6EHERAL HOTES
~'moJ ~'~0 GENERAL cwo NO.
STANDARD SYMROL~
ORGANIC M,ATERIAL COBBLES ~ BOULDERS IGNEOUS ROCK
CLAY :~;6 CONGLOMERATE METAMORPHIC
SANDY SILT
SILT GRADING TO
SANDY SILT
SANDY GRAVEL,
SCATTEREO COBBLES
(ROCK FRAGMENTS)
INTERLAYERED SAND
I~ SANDY GRAVEL
SILTY CLAY w/TR. SAND
SAMPLER TYPE SYMBOLS
St ..... 1.4" SPLIT SPOOI'J WITH 47-~ HAMMER
Ss .... 1.4" SPLIT SPOON WITH 140¢~ HAMMER
SI .... 2.5" SPLIT SPOON WITH 140# HAMMER
Sh .... 25" SPLIT SPOON WITH :340~ HAMMER
S~ .... 2.0" SPLIT SPOON WITH 140# HA,V, MER
Sz .... L4" SPLIT SPOON WITH $40# HAMMER
Rp .... 2.§" SPLIT SPOON, PUSHED
H$ ..... 1.4" SPLIT SPOON DRIVEN WITH AIR HAMMER
HI o . . '.. 2.5" SPLIT SPOON DRIVEN WITH AIR HAMMER
NOTE:
Ts .... SHELBY TUBE
Tm .... MODIFIED SHELBY TUBE
Pb o.-. o PITCHER BARREL
Cs .... CORE BARREL WITH SINGLE TUBE
Cd .... CORE BARREL WITH DOUBLE TUBE
Bs .... BULK SA,~PLE
A ..... AUGER SAMPLE
G ..... GRAB SAMPLE .
SAMPLER TYPES ARE EITHER NOTED ABOVE THE BORING LOG OR ADJACENT TO IT AT THE RESPECTIVE*
SAMPLE . DEPTH.
TYPICAL BORING LOG
BORING NfJ/.fSER-.~T.H. 3,0-15 Elev 274,6 .~-.EI.E'V/IT/ON /N FEET
DA~ ~RI~D- ~tO- 21- 70 All SomCes Ss~A&fP&Eff TYP~
O'
~ OHGANIC MATERIAL I'
" I[~ ICC~ SILT
,. ~ ~stlmote 6b ~o V~s~le Ice
GR~DATIO~A~ CH~NG~
Ss
t'ROZ£N GROU~,~D
SANDY SILT
/,~PPROXIM,~TE STRAT~ CHAIVG~
L~ttle toNoV~sible Ice I~O' V~ ~ /C~ DESCBIPT/O,V ~ C~/FICARON
72, 5ZI °/o, 85 9pcf~ 28~ GP (CORPS OF ENGI,~E~RS ~f~TH~)
SAUDY GRAVEL '
95 SCHIST ~GE~ER~UZ[D SOI~ OR EOCK D~SC~IPT/ON
Engineering E~ Geological Consul tant~
EXPLANATION OF SELECTED SYMBOLS
August Z3, 1~7~
Dickinson-Oswald & Partners
g00 Cordova Street
Anchorage, Alask~ g9501
Attention: I,Irs. ~o Frankfourth
Subject: Mann Subdivision, Addition ~2
Dear 14rs. Frankfourth:
The Greater Anchorage Area Borough, Department of Envtron~nental
Quality is In receipt of tile platt of the subject subdivision.
After revte)l of our files, we find soils information will be
necessary along with the location of all individual sewer and
~later systems on eaci~ lot in this proposed subdivision.
Should you h:ve any questions regarding this matter, please
contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
Roll Strickland,
Chief Sanitarian
bb
cc: Alan Scheen,
RoSe
Planning Department
August 8, 1972
Es. Jo Frankfeurth
DicklnsonGOswald & Partners
DO0 Cordova Street
Ancilora~e, Alaska 99501
Subject: f!a~ln Subdivision,
Dear ~.is. Frankf~urth:
Addition #2.
Our Departme~)t is requesting th]t soils data be subn~ttted with
the subject subdivision along ~.~it~) the other appropriate sewer
and water infor)~)atiun suc~) as placer~ent of se~er systems and
t~ater supplies. I uould recon:mend one "test" for each lot.
Sincerely,
~olln ~. Lee,
Environmental
bb
~,So
Services Supervisor
F
i
R&M
Civil En3ine-~rs
GEOLOGICk,-' CONSULTANTS
ENGh c' -RING &
229 EAST 51st, AVE. - P.O. BOX ~-'L "- ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503
TELEPHONE 907-279-0~$3 "~- TELEX 030-35419
Geologist~ L~nd ~urv-~yor~
September 9, 1972
No. 25121
l~[r. Maurice Osw~d
Dfc 'k{nson Oswald & Partners
P. O. Box 326
Anchorage, A/aska
Re: Subsurface Soll [nvesti[at:[on (For Sanitary System) Proposed Sub-
division at 163rd Avenue and Golden View Drive, Addendum Le~cer
Dear A%r. Oswald:
In response to ),our request, we are su])m{ttin~ our interpretation o~ sur-
face area (square foot/bedroom) requirements for placement of seepa[e
pits in the soils encountered at subject site. The following tabulation of
values is based on the assumed influence of the high percentaEe of gravel
contained in the respective soils.
Test IIole
1
Depth Soil Type Sq. Feet/Bearra
4-10 Silty Sanfly Gravel (GM-SM) 200
10-17.5 Sandy Silt (SM-ML) 250
3.5-17.5 Gravel Sand (GM-SM) 200
65-15 Silty Sand w/~ravel (G,%'[-SI%I) 200
3.5-15 Gravel Sand {GM-SM) 200
The Unified Sol/Classification symbols noted on the borinE lo~s in our re-
port Drawin~ A-02 represent a strict: interpretation of the soil classifY- ~..
cation units listed on the chart provided by the Greater Anchorage Area
Borough, Department o~ Environmental Quality. Because o~ the border-
line ~radat{on o~ the material, we feel the above listed values provid'e: a '
more real~st~c representation o~ {n s~tu conditions. ·
We regret air inconvenience v;e may have caused and hope the above in~or-
September 9, I972
Mr. 0 swal',l
Page 2
raation ~vilI serve to clari~y your questlo6s regarding soil classif{cation
and seepage pit requirements.
Shotdd other questions ar{se, please let us know.
Very truly yours,
R & M ENGINEEPJNG & GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
]WR:wb
xc: Mr. Arthur l%Iann
R&M ENGIN55RING & GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
~ .
90 .......... I0
.... Illll --~ ~11' IIlll I
~ I00
0 ~ mo m m ~ o.~ o.~ o.e~ o.0~ o~o~ o~
GRAVEL SAFJD
~'~L~ ~ -
~;~. W.C. LL PL PI CLASSIFICATION ~o~osea
BlS2 NV ! NE NV Sandy S{l~ Trace Gravel (ML) Development
I~2S2 NV ~ NP NV Grave~ Sand Trace to Some S~I~ (SM) Arthur Man Proporty
G~IN SIZE CURVE
~ 3S2 NV NP NV Silty Sand Trace Gravel
I R~M
~ ~N~]N~RI~G ~ G~OGICAL CON~ULTANT~
DR~WN APPROVED DAT~ PROJ. ~O.
· ' 229 E*... 51,t. AVE. - P.O. BOX ~087 - ANCHOR;,--: ALASKA 99503 ~9
TELEPHONE 9071279-O183 1ELEX 0~-35419 .
JAMES W. ROO~,,E Y. P. E1
MALCOLI'.I Al L~'=NZIES, P.E.. L.S.
JAMES H. ';;'2 LLI'.IAN. P.E.
October 18, 1972
R & /%I No. 25121
Mr. Maurice Oswald, P~rdner
Dic'Idnson - Oswald &~Pe~tners
P. O. Box 325
Anchorage, Alaska
Re: Proposed Subdivision Development, Arthur Mann Property, Perched
I Water Conditions
Dear Mr. Oswald:.
At Mr. Mann's request we have re,dewed slt~ con~tions and attempted to eveI'uate
perched ground water levels following completion of the drainage ~tch excavations.
A general map showing the approximate location and drainage paths for the various
ditches is attached.
.Iland probes were made at selected locations on October 2, 1972 immediately a£ter
completion of the dltckin~ operations to verify the level o£ perched water. A
co.~t inspection was made on October 17, 1972 to further review the present state
o£ site drainage.
]n ~eneral, it appears that the excavated ditch sections will allow sufficient drain-
age and eventual ellraJnatlon of the perched water table found in the peat overburden
·chroughout much o£ the site. Due to recent wet and rainy conditions, it was not
possible to ascertain whether a slgni~cant change in the water level had occurred
over this short period, however, it is our feeling that the provisions taken to en-
hance drainage willbe e£fectlve. Because o~ the variation in relle£, we expect
.~hat the higher lots v!ill drain at a more rapid rate. Drainage of the lower sections
should be anticipated to occtrr at a somewhat slower rate.
It Js hoped the above information'serves to identify the state of present perched
ground water and drainage conditions. Should you have any questions please let
me know.
Very truly yours, 1,3, 6.
James tV. Rooney
NOV t t972 .i l.
.~¥ R: wb
xc: Arthur l%~ann . l -' l l
ANCHORAGE~ . 'FAIRBANKS JUNEAU
\
IG2nd '
LOT NUMBERS
I,'lI LOT NUMBERS .
1~I I
. , d,I .. I
, ~ . ~{{
'.l',
'" ~ ~) I
~ III ' . : , .
I~ . .- . · . ,:,~ ~ . [1~ .
· 3 , I,,,I
'" ' "',
m 11--- ~- - .t', >
, . -,
II
· ~ ' ,~i-4 ..' .. ,
· ..~
-
n~ 165 ~d AVENUE
'"~ote= Local{ohs of test ho{es ore opprox.,~nd hove not been Surveyed, '
- Proposad ' Subdiv]s}on Development
,.Aulhur Mann Prou~rty
.~ngln~ering ~O~logic~l Consultant= LOOATIOH OF BO~INGS
R&M' ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL' CONSULTANTS
229 EAST 515t. AVE. - P.O. 80X 6087 - ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503
TELEPHONE 907-279-0483 TELEX 090-35419
C/vii Engine~rs Geolo;[$t$ Land Surveyors
JAMES W. ROONEY, P. E.
MALCOLM A. MENZIES, P.E.. L,S.,
JAMES H. WELLMAN,
September
"!973
R & bi No. 25121
RALPH R. MIGLIACCIO
Lore~ca S~reet ·
Anchorage,- AK
Re: Sub~{v~s~on Deve/opmen~, Arthur Mann ProperLy, Pezche~ Groundwater
Conditions
- Dear Mr. Manta
At your reguest we have reviewed the perched ~roundwater level cordlti~s
since the e/even mo~ths have e/apeed following completion oE site drainage
ditch excavations ar~ ~'dtial probing on October 2, 1972. Hand probes were
performed on Augu~ 30, 1973 at approxirmtely the same locations of the
original probes to asoer~ain the present level of the perched water. Typi.~11y,
0nly a very sm~11 an~ount of perched water was four~t to be present ar~l in some
instances water was absent.
In general, it appears that the excavated ditch sections have allowed drainage oE
the perched water table fou~l in the peat overburden throughout much of the site.
Due to recent we~ and rainy con~itlons, it was not poss~le to determine the
raaxirnum ex'cent of drainage that has occur=ed in the peat since a certain amour~c
o4= water is retained in the peat. It is otnc belief that the present rernah~
apparent perched water is due to the inherent sponge-llke ma~n:e of the overlying
organic mat aha the peat to absorb-: and retain inc~derd: rain,n11:
~n conclltiens observed at the site, resnlt$ oE a recent test pit: excavation
and the low soi[ moisture contents mote~[ in our or~ml report, it is mtr fe~l~ng
that, in general, the perched or surface groumtwater conclltion has been adequately
alleviated. Surface runof:E from above the site is presently intercelYced by the
dJt.ch system and the collected water is directed to a small s~ream at the lower
er~ of the s~te.
It is hoped that the above ad~tional information serves to clarify any remainirg
questions o~ perched ~£om~water and drainage con6itions at the site.. Should you
have any fom~cher questions please let me know.
Vex7 ~-uly yours, '"
R & M ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
Part:ne~CHORAGE '
JUNEAU