HomeMy WebLinkAboutROSEBERRY RIDGE ESTATES #1 S12213Onsite File
Roseberry
Ridge Estates
Lots 1-4
#512213
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
REVISED — March 30, 2016
Municipality of Anchorage
Development Service Department
On -Site Water & Wastewater Program
4700 Elmore Road
Anchorage, AK 99507
Attention: Deb Wockenfuss
Phone: 907-343-7906
Subject: Soils Investigation Report and Well/Septic Reserve Area for the
Proposed Subdivision of Roseberry Ridge Estates Subdivision #1; Tract C
(Case # S-12213) Located off in Eagle River, Alaska
Mrs Wockenfuss,
Roseberry Ridge Estates Subdivision #1, Tract C is located in Eagle River, Alaska. Based on the
preliminary plat drawing provided to us, the subdivision of Tract C will consist of four (4) lots. We have
excavated and logged test holes on each proposed lot that will be used to establish septic reserve areas
or platted drainfields for each lot in the subdivision.
PROPOSED WELL AND SEPTIC RESERVE AREAS
We have prepared soil logs for all test holes (see attached). Per MOA wastewater ordinance AMC
15.65.180. we are required to provide a site map showing a septic reserve area for each lot that meets
the requirements set forth in Table 2 of AMC 15.65.180 (see below).
TABLE_2
TABLE INSET:
Percolation Rate
minutes/inch
Total Reserved Area (square
feet
1--5
10,000
5--12
12,000
12--24
14,000
24--60
16,000
The percolation tests for all four (4) test holes ranged between 3.5 to 3.8 minutes/inch. Based upon
Table 2, each lot would require a septic reserve area of 10,000 square feet. As can be seen on the site
map, which has topographical information established by Fred Walatka and Associates, the majority of
the property has steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%) over the entire area except for occasional small
3701 East Tudor Road, Suite 101 ' Anchorage, Alaska 99507-1259
Phone: (907) 337-6179. Fax. (907) 338-3246' Website: www garnessengineering corn
PrtY�' � nl i
areas/plateaus that have slopes less than 25%. In short, there is not enough area on these plateaus to
provide septic reserve areas and meet slope setback requirements. Therefore, we are proposing to us
platted drainfield sites for this subdivision.
Per AMC 15.65.180, 'The lot must contain sufficient area to provide for a structure, and a well or
water source, and sufficient area for an original onsite wastewater disposal system and two
replacement subsurface disposal fields designed in accordance with the standards and
procedures of sections 15.65.040, 15.65.050, and 15.65.060. The plat must designate the
maximum number of bedrooms allowed on each lot The area to be used for wastewater
disposal system and replacement subsurface disposal fields must be designated on the plat for
each lot as being unavailable for use for driveways, parking area, or structures." As can be seen
on the detail drawings for each lot (sheets 2-5 of 5), we have shown platted drainfield sites and cross-
section details showing the existing slope conditions. Due to the very limited area, we have proposed
that the original drainfield sites utilize conventional type deep trenches drainfield and the two (2)
replacement disposal fields for each lot utilize deep trench type drainfields served by require Cat II
advanced wastewater treatment systems. On the detail drawing is the design criteria for both the original
and replacement disposal fields. Due to the limited area, we are proposing the number of bedrooms be
limited to a maximum of four (4). There appears to be sufficient area for a structure, driveway, well, and
onsite wastewater disposal system for each lot.
We are recommending the following notes be placed on the final plat:
1. The original drainfield site for each /of can be a conventional deep trench type
drainfield; however, the replacement drainfields shall be served by a Category 11 or
Category 111 advanced wastewater treatment system approved by the Municipality of
Anchorage. A maximum of four (4) bedroom homes shall be built on each lot
2. Driveways, parking areas, and structures shall not be constructed over wastewater
disposal reserve areas.
3. Alternate locations for wastewater disposal reserved area may be used if approved by
the municipality. In which case, the locations shown hereon shall move to the new
locations and an amended plat shall be filed with the State Recorder's Office detailing
the changes.
SLOPE WAIVER REQUEST FOR PLATTED DRAINFIELD SITES:
As can be seen on the attached detail drawing with cross section details, we are requesting slope waiver
for all four (4) lots. All drainfield sites are encroaching upon slopes greater than 25 percent. The following
is a list of each lot and the request slope waiver distance:
• Proposed Lot 1 — Requesting 20 foot waiver to slope greater than 25%.
• Proposed Lot 2 — Requesting 25 foot waiver to slope greater than 25%.
• Proposed Lot 3 — Requesting 0 foot waiver to slope greater than 25%.
• Proposed Lot 4 — Requesting 0 foot waiver to slope greater than 25%.
The slopes below the platted drainfield sites range from 25 to 50 percent slopes on all of the lots. As can
be seen on the cross-section detail drawings, we have shown a 25 percent imaginary line starting at 2
feet above the top of the drainrock (2.5 feet above the invert of the distribution lines) for each platted
drainfield site. For all the lots, these imaginary lines do not daylight within 50 feet downhill of the lowest
drainfield. The slopes below the platted drainfield sites are heavily vegetated. Given these mitigating
3701 East Tudor Road, Suite 101 • Anchorage. Alaska 99507-1259
Phone: (907) 337-6179' Fax: (907) 338-3246' Website: www, garnessengineering.com
Page 3 of 3
factors and the porosity of the soils, it is our opinion that there is minimal risk with the granting of these
waivers.
WATER AVIALABILITY:
We have performed records research on some of the surrounding properties and have attached the well
logs and other well information. Based upon this information, it appears that water availability for this
subdivision is marginal. A recent hydrology study was performed for the new subdivision to the North of
this project. This new subdivision, now called Roseberry Highland S/D, had a plat note regarding the low
well water production. Based upon this plat note, we are recommending a similar note be placed on the
plat. The following is the recommended note:
4. A recent hydrology study was performed in the adjacent subdivision now called
Roseberry Highland SO indicating low well water production. Similar results may be
expected for this subdivision and it should be anticipated that water wells within the
subdivision may produce marginal quantities of water and water storage or possible
hydro-fracking of the wells may be required to develop an adequate water supply.
In regards to four (4) new wells affecting the water availability of the neighboring developed lots, based
upon the aquifer test performed in 2012 by Northrim Engineering for Roseberry Highlands S/D, Lots 1-9
& Tract 1, it was stated:
"During the flow test, the observation wells had minimal impact from the discharge well. It is anticpated
that this will be the case for the proposed water wells in the subdivision. A total of 9 new single family
residential water well is not expected to adversely affect neighboring subdivision wells."
Given the close proximity of this aquifer test to this proposed subdivision, it is likely that a similar impact
will be caused by these four (4) new wells.
If you have any qurtstions, please contact us at 337-6179.
E., M.S.
3701 East Tudor Road, Suite 101 * Anchorage, Alaska 99507-1259
Phone: (907) 337-6179 * Fax: (907) 338-3246 * Website: www. garnessengineering.com
/
SEPTIC RESERVE
(SEE SHEET 2 C
LOT 5. BLOCK 2;
RIDGE ESTATES SDt,
NO ENCROACHMENT CONCERNS.
WELLISEPTIC ON NORTH END OF LOT
LOT 1
\ �•� LOT B; ROSEBERRY /
\ HIGHLANDS SD / /
\ \
TRACTHL�SM
5EPTIC RESERVE SITES \
(SEE SHEET 3 OF 5)
LOT 7; HIGHLAND TERRACE SID I Y ) J
NO ENCROACHMENT CONCERNS- I i
1.
WELVSEPTIC ON 10T.
j I ---- --= C—SF�cTc►��
LOT 6; HIGHLAND TERRACE SO
�\
7MIGHLANDNSSSIID�Y
SHOWING 15 UTILITY EASEMENTS AND
I'
UPDATED DRAINFIELD LOCATION.
I
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED CROSS SECTION
DETAIL DRAWINGS ARE STILL APPLICABLE
Z
FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
N
LU �
\
LOT 9: ROSEBERRY
m 'D
HIGHLANDS SID
LU
C�
w
W
-,
LOT 6; ROSEBERRY /
w0)
ZO �i
mw
ww 0
\ �•� LOT B; ROSEBERRY /
\ HIGHLANDS SD / /
\ \
TRACTHL�SM
5EPTIC RESERVE SITES \
(SEE SHEET 3 OF 5)
LOT 7; HIGHLAND TERRACE SID I Y ) J
NO ENCROACHMENT CONCERNS- I i
1.
WELVSEPTIC ON 10T.
j I ---- --= C—SF�cTc►��
LOT 6; HIGHLAND TERRACE SO
�\
7MIGHLANDNSSSIID�Y
SHOWING 15 UTILITY EASEMENTS AND
I'
UPDATED DRAINFIELD LOCATION.
I
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED CROSS SECTION
DETAIL DRAWINGS ARE STILL APPLICABLE
Z
FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
N
LU �
n
m 'D
LU
Om mm
w
W
2 L mf
LOT 6; ROSEBERRY /
w0)
ZO �i
mw
ww 0
HIGHLANDSSID
�jV
W•L
a a
n o
0
I
\
I
LOT T ROSEBERRY
/
HIGHLANDS SD
60-
-
I
N
NOTE: TOPOGRAPHICAL
INFORMATION WAS SUPPLIED
BY WALATKA AND ASSOCIATES
RESERVE SITES\
SHEET 4 OF s)
------ __-___—__-1
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
LOT 12 HIGHLAND TERRACE SIO
----------
I -
---
I;
TRACT I; ROSEBERRY I
/ HIGHLANDS SID ® I
NOTE: DRAWING UPDATED ON 7/202016
I
SHOWING 15 UTILITY EASEMENTS AND
I'
UPDATED DRAINFIELD LOCATION.
I
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED CROSS SECTION
DETAIL DRAWINGS ARE STILL APPLICABLE
Z
FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
N
YTIC RESERVE SITES
(SEE SHEET 5 OF 5)
LOT IA; HIGHLAND TERRACE SD M
NO ENCROACHMENT CONCERNS,
VVELUSEPTIC ON SOUTH END OF LOT.
G!
y
z�
O a.
nW
am
OW
W O
4w
In
w
t
LU
LU
LU
LU
LUO
Z
Q
In
Z
O
f. -
L) 0
w
J
O
In
LUI-
W
H
0
LL
Z
gtta
�+ W
O =
w �
CE -7
aRLil
W Ty
N
z N
Z
N
LU �
n
m 'D
LU
Om mm
w
W
2 L mf
w0)
ZO �i
mw
ww 0
0�
�jV
W•L
a a
n o
0
z�
O a.
nW
am
OW
W O
4w
In
w
t
LU
LU
LU
LU
LUO
Z
Q
In
Z
O
f. -
L) 0
w
J
O
In
LUI-
W
H
0
LL
Z
gtta
�+ W
O =
w �
CE -7
aRLil
i OF BEDROOMS:
IS PER DAY (GPQ : 000
ATION RATEIS: 3.8 MO-AlTESIINCH
SED APPLICATION RATE: '10 GPDM.FT.
M DRAINFIELD SD.FT.: 150
CAT II ADVANCED WASTEWATER SYSTEM
VFIELD DESIGN:
IM DEPTH: 11 FEET
2.5 FEET
1: 20 FEET
NE: SFEET
. SO FT 200
LOT 2A, BLOCK 1;
ROSEBERRY RIDGE ESTATES SID
10D'WELL RADIUS �1
NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 4 !
GALLONS PER DAY (GPQ 800 I
PERCOLATION RATES: 3.8 MWUTESIINCH !
PROPOSED APPLICATION RATE: 12GP SOFT. / ALTERNATE
MINIMUM GRAINFIELD SD.FT.: 800 i
MAXIMUM DEPTH: 11 FEET
WIDTH.
WIDTH: 2.5 FEET /
/
LENGTH: 50 FEET TIMI1
EFFECTIVE: S FEET r-.
ACTUAL SO.FT.: 500 ALTERNATE SITE 02 � I ;
ro
SCALE !
LOT
1
ROSEBERRY RI DGE ESTATES SID
NO ENCROACHMENT CONCERNS. \ 9 I
WELL ON WEST END OF LOT.
211' WAVER REOUESTED TO 1
azz...................50 FEET SLOPE GREATER THAN 25%
T' m 1
........................................................................................................................ _.................................T..................................... .__......_..........._...... ._... ..
N9CME �
® 1.
-
F—+2a
..........................................................................................
CROSS SECTION DETAIL A -A
4r
PROPOSED
LOT 1
PROPOSED
LOT 2
b
v
N
N
p
N
F�
z
O
a;
1
¢ww�
p
OO
m
w10
2 L
m�
j
g�
mC>
zo
zJ
LLI
r On W
U)
co
a x
a
a
a
❑
❑
v
F�
a;
OO
CO
W.
1
ILLI
p
m
r On W
U)
co
a x
LL
T` w
0
LL
W
rA1/ Z
1WA
U
U
Wi
j
w
o
or.
1--w
w
j
Y� z'
a
p
�
p
r 1•I w
N
W
J
w
LL
z
�
WU
Q
U)a
W
w
LL
o
p
(9
z
�
^/
Fr
•1
w
R
¢ m
W
0
K J
O
.U)
3H00
rh
w
Aw*:1 _JJ.I —'!iwr 1. *
z 1
I
r•x
NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 4
GALLONS PER DAY (GPD) BOB
z N
PERCOLATION RATES: 3.5 MINUTE30NCH
/
PROPOSED APPLICATION RATE: 12 GPD SO.FT.
/
MINIMUM DRAINFIELDSO.FT.: 500
O W
DRAINFIELD DESIGN:
MAXIMUMDEPTH: 13FEET'
/ PROPOSED 100 FOOT
/ / WELL RADIUS
WIDTH: Zb FEET
�R
LENGTH: 50 FEET
/ PROPOSED 100 FOOT
EFFECTIVE: SFEET
/ WELL RADIUS
ACTUAL SO FT.500
'/ PROPOSED
--- - -- -
LOT 2
R OF BEDROOMS. 4
IS PER DAY (GPC) : BOD
ATION RATES: 3.5 MI UTESONCH
SEDAPPLICATION RATE: •40GPDfSO.FT.
M GRAINFIELD SOFT: 150
CAT II ADVANCED WASTEWATER SYSTEM
MAXIMUMDEPTH: 13 FEET
WIDTH: 2.5 FEET
LENGTH: 2DFEET
EFFECTIVE: 5FEET
ACTUAL SOFT. : 200
MARY SITE
F'yF
i
TERNATE SITE I1
i
�-ALTERNATE SITE Q
PROPOSED
LOT 3-
PROPO.SED100FOOT
LL RADIUS
eM CROSS SECTION DETAIL A -A
0
400
04
n
a
O
9
(4�I
Z
O
N �
O
J
LU
a
O OLL
K y
a w
F
U �
QU w
K w
F W
m
;- w
a �
cn
2
w
W
W
W z Z
a �
V o
W LL
w O
0
OIr Z
3QQ
Zo K
4� O
a W jy
W�Q
w U) 3
F
00 w
4(r w0
(7
W
ry
z N
N
n
t1
O W
t0
w
�R
amu- m�j
iJ O Z
lu
W8
rc W i--
u
<�
a a
a ❑
❑
400
04
n
a
O
9
(4�I
Z
O
N �
O
J
LU
a
O OLL
K y
a w
F
U �
QU w
K w
F W
m
;- w
a �
cn
2
w
W
W
W z Z
a �
V o
W LL
w O
0
OIr Z
3QQ
Zo K
4� O
a W jy
W�Q
w U) 3
F
00 w
4(r w0
(7
W
'6 NUMBER OF BEDROOMS:4
! GALLONS PER DAV ( GPD) . ODD
PERCOLATION RATEIS: 3.5 MWUTESDNCH
\ PROPOSED APPLICATION RATE. 12 GPLYSO.Fr.
\ MINIMUM DRAMIFIELD SO.FT.. 500
DRAINFIELD DESIGN:
MAXIMUA DEPTH: 11 FEET
\Y i
\ WIDTH: 2.5 FEET
�.`\` LENGTH: 50 FEET
SED � EFFECTIVE : sFEET
ACTUAL i SO.Fr.. 500 _--INC
DESIGN CRITERIA: ( ALTERNATE SITE
NUMBER Of BEDROOMS:4
% GALLONS PER DAY (GPq : O00
PERCOLATION RATEIS: 3.5 MM1rESONCH
PROPOSED APPLICATION RATE: -4.0 GPDMQFT.
MINO.01M DRA NFIELD SO.FT.: 150
'USING CAT It ADVANCED WASTEWATER SYSTEM
DRAINFIELD DESIGN:
\ MAXIMUM DEPTH: 11 FEET
WIDTH: 2.5 FEET
LENGTH
LENGTH: 20 FEET
EFFECTIVE: 5 FEET
ACTUAL SO FT200
J-
J"
_r -
tori
--PROPOSED 100 FOOT
WELL RADIUS
PROPOSED 100 FOOT
WELL RADIUS
PROPOSED
LOT 2
_ 4:T
z
..' w
00 m LL
SITE H
\ a W
TERNATE
PROPOSED
LOT 3,
PROPOSED 100 FOOT
WELL RADIUS,
t0
U
j
WZ
r
N
o
r
1n
ID
0
w
(`^/1 W
IT
w�
¢�
1--�
J
w
�
�LL
>�
co
w�
w
LL
LU
o
O
av
n
o
0
KOC
w
w CD
0w
3 Q
op
660
I1 ----n
I�
0
z
�
O
�
y
F
OJ
Z
�—
N
CO
CO
z=
o
o
0
4zw
U
j
WZ
w
o
r
1n
Lx
0
w
(`^/1 W
67j
-i
w
1--�
J
TD
LU
LL
z
�
wUco
LU
Q
w
LL
LU
o
O
Ir
z
KOC
w
w CD
0w
3 Q
op
660
_ .•(,- NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: a
/ °r'•Fi..i�.S i�•. .p ..5:`r�ji tS / J� GALLONS PER DAV (GPDI :800
9 '���:3-..1 a, :'/. '+'�-?Y.:`'. [">�:' ',jai / / * PERCOLATIONRATES' 3AMINUTESBNCH
to
-c�~�� �� �• Q(y �•%:Y :�'t ' �1 ��1 / f PROPOSED APPLICATION RATE. 1.2 GPOISO.FT.
�\ / � •,:_ -�, a:-7¢i63yai�1��'C��f1AtiM•✓i� / MINIMUM DRAINFIELD SO.FT.. 500
i'•zc yL"T TT r. 3'- j� /
: i 73 ..::.'••� ..?.'J:•T+'� x`• ,
DRAINFIELD DESIGN:
/ ��� i's;aY•:. w'.. �•ir::'eFr" .'NT,Y .'� •. ;rir� 4y.1..7y / \
�•-y,Y .r,+'�1`.• 1J'!r'..:� :.j!�': MDEPTH: 13 FEET
.`4 _t Z- WIDTH.MAXIMUM
'w-Y•5:� r ..'/ /:eai WIDTH: 25FEET
/ � 4- ' a .rte-a-�c-.�F 5 LENGTH: 50 FEET
EFFECTIVE: 5 FEET
/ 1• - / ACTUAL SOFT.. 50D
PROPOSED 100 FOOT 1+ DESIGN CRITERIA ( ALTERNATE SITES)
WELL RADIUS /
`\ / NUMBER OF BEDROOMS 1
TERNATE SITE II / r GALLONS PER DAY (GPQ . BOD
`�\ /•• // PERCOLATION RATES: 3.BMIAITESIIJC.H
\ o PROPOSED APPLICATION RATE: •I0 GPOPSO.FT.
��• U MINIMUM DRA1NFTELDSQ.FT.: 150
i*USING
PROPOSED i DRAT FIELD' DESIGN: WASTEWATER SYSTEM
DRAINFIELD DESIGN:
LOT 3 \` ) - PROPOSED 100 FOOT WELL RADIUS MAXIMUM DEPTH: 13 FEET
-- PROAARY SITE Q' I WIDTH: 2.5 FEET
I ALTERNATE SITE 82 LENGTH: 2DPEET
ft EFFECTIVE: 5FEET
( ACTUAL SQTT.: 200
1
11
p 11
rOrB PROPOSED
r� \
LOT 4
G \
-------------------------------------------- ----------------
D WAIVER REQUESTED TO SLOPES GREATER THAN 25% —1-- 7
CROSS SECTION DETAIL A -A
10
O
Q
Z
W
Ile
wU
pd�
aW
N
N
m'D
m
W�
M
w
iO
WIA
i.J
�0�V
c�
w
>
W
1�1
O
z
O
O
ED
W
I
1/� CZ9
d
O
^ W
0
a
LL
(1)
-J.
w
ii�i11
h�LWU
Z
WZ
j
O
>
�
a
w
(D
W
o
ISI
o
0
�w
1n
w
L�
�—I
ALJ
F
LL
z
i
WC
Q
W
w
o
o
z
xco
aW
ca
0
KJ
aW
i DU
QQ
3
V
W
Z
E7
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
11.1. RRMF Wn 101'�MG.. I.' W.., w'.'•pmnss-p.^ee'rpcom
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ROSEBERRY RIDGE ESTATES SID #1: TRACT C - PROPOSED LOT 1
'ERFORMED FOR: ERIC BRAENDEL DATE: 5/19/1015
:EPTH
.feet) TEST HOLE #1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
?3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
GM
SOILCLASSIF ATIONS
•-
GP M
N
CL
•
SW !f�Lif��i OE
222. SP
�4 f
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
DRY
5/19/2015
DRY
526/2015
15'
1 011 2/2 01 5
6"
"
:4
•..,2(Z °I ISP•.
f VE.S.S
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
SI1912015 1
3:48
6"
"
2
3:58
10
3-3/8"
2-5/8"
3
3:58
6"
4
4:08
10
3-1/4"
2-3/4"
5
4:08
-
6"
6
4:18
10
3-3/8"
2-5/8"
7
4:18
6"
8
4:28
10
3-3/8"
2-5/8"
9
4:28
-
6"
10
4:38
10
3-3/8"
2-5/8"
11
4:38
-
6"
"
12
4:48
10
3-3/8"
2-5/8"
PERCOLATION RATE 3.8 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE D�A. 6 (INCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 7 FT. AND 8 �T.
A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: YES 0 NO ❑
- ,ILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ERIK WIDGER
COMMENTS. PERCOLATION READINGS ARE WITHIN 1116 OF INCH.
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE@F IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: G
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
-FORAGE AK9507' plgWtW7', 337 A 179' F. (W7) 33632b' NBSITE w ymWl,wlyWT
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
_,'GAL DESCRIPTION: ROSEBERRY RIDGE ESTATES S/D #1: TRACT C - PROPOSED LOT 2
'-RFORMED FOR: ERIC BRAENDEL DATE: 5/19/2015
-,'PTH
"E0 ORGANICS ITEST HOLE #2
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
it
12
13
14
5
16
17
18
Sm
SOIL
CLASSIFICATIONS
5/19/2015
DRY
5/26/2015
DRY
10/12/2015
6"
2
4:02
10
3-1/8"
ML
3
4:02
6"
CL
4
412
10
3"
3"
5
4:12
6"
6
45
10
3"
CH
7
4:22
-
6"
"
8
4:32
SC
3"
3"
GM
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
DRY
5/19/2015
DRY
5/26/2015
DRY
10/12/2015
6"
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
5/19/2015 1
3:52
-
6"
2
4:02
10
3-1/8"
2-7/8"
3
4:02
6"
"
4
412
10
3"
3"
5
4:12
6"
6
4:22
10
3"
3"
7
4:22
-
6"
"
8
4:32
10
3"
3"
9
4:32
6"
-
10
4:42
10
3-1/8"
2-7/8"
11
4:42
6"
-
12
4:52
10
3-1/8"
2-7/8"
PERCOLATION RATE 3.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES)
19
TEST RUN BETWEEN 6 FT. AND 7 FT.
B.O.H.
20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: YES 0 NO ❑
SDILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ERIK WIDGER
COMMENTS: PERCOLATION READINGS ARE WITHIN 1/16 OF INCH.
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PERFOR ED INCCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE:
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
_I A AK 7-M W (W) -N BSITE w y�.f
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
_!-GAL DESCRIPTION: ROSESERRY RIDGE ESTATES S/D #1 TRACT C - PROPOSED LOT 3
�=RFORMED FOR: ERIC BRAENDEL DATE: 5/1912015
DEP_
feet)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
GM
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
Sm SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
5/19/2015
ORG
77777 GP
MIL
II•'I'�'�
COMCIILHLH
GSCW
2
II"IIII
10
may]
2-7/8"
/��/���/�i
�1��27L�r 'Y/i/,
•
InL~�i�Sc
6"
GM
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
DRY
5/19/2015
DRY
5126/2015
DRY
10/12/2015
6"
-
0
'OROFESStw�`l
DATE READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
5/1912015 1
3:55
-
6"
-
2
4:05
10
3-1/8"
2-7/8"
3
4:05
-
6"
4
4:15
10
3-1/8"
2-7/8"
5
4:15
6"
-
6
4:25
10
3-1/8"
2-7/8"
7
4:25
6"
8
4:35
10
3-1/8"
2-7/8"
9
4:35
-
6"
10
4:45
10
3-1/8"
2-7/8"
11
4:45
-
6"
-
12
4:55
10
3-1/8"
2-7/8"
PERCOLATION RATE 3.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE D A.
TEST RUN BETWEEN 6 FT. AND 7 FT.
A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: YES E NO ❑
-;OILS LOGGED BY: JODYMAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ERIK WIDGER
COMMENTS: PERCOLATION READINGS ARE WITHIN 1/16 OF INCH.
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. ],JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PEF?RM [J 14N ACCORDANCE
WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: ✓/
6 (INCHES)
u
GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
3`01E TUC RWD SUIE 101-/. ryGIgMGE At 65'L -'4O1 A- 33'41'5' QPM[D 11. 119-NESIITE� �0nwm0
SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
_=GAL DESCRIPTION: ROSBERRY RIDGE ESTATES SID #1: TRACT C - PROPOSED LOT4
PERFORMED FOR: ERIC BRAENDEL DATE: 5/1914015
EPTH ----
feet) ORGANICS ITEST HOLE #4
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
1.
12
13
14
5
18
19
20
SN
SOIL CLASSIFICA
8v%S
••
5119/2015
DRY
GP
NL
10/122015
4:00
CIL
6"
GC
OLj�
2
-00
10
3"
•
�,,,iCH
3
I;��i��11
RE
�i>/�OH
6"
sc
GM
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
DATE
DRY
5119/2015
DRY
5 /2612 01 5
DRY
10/122015
4:00
-
DATE
READING
CLOCK
TIME
NET TIME
(MINUTES)
WATER LEVEL
READING
NET DROP
(INCHES)
5/19/2015
1
4:00
-
6"
-
2
4:10
10
3"
3"
3
4:10
-
6"
-
4
4:20
10
3"
3"
5
4:20
6"
-
6
4:30
10
3"
3"
7
4:30
-
6"
-
8
4:40
10
3-118"
2-718"
9
4:40
-
6"
-
10
4:50
10
3-114"
2-3/4"
11
4:50
-
6"
-
12
5:00
10
3-114"
2-316'
PERCOLATION RATE 3.6 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 ( NCHES)
TEST RUN BETWEEN 6 FT. AND 7 FT.
A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: YES E NO ❑
SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ERIK WIDGER
COMMENTS: PERCOLATION READINGS ARE WITHIN 1/16 OF INCH.
PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PER ORM D IN ACCORDANCE
1llITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 'L
Municipality of Anchorage AOL
P.O. Box 196650 • 4700 Elmore Road
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 • (907) 343-7904 • Fax (907) 343-7997
http://www.muni.org/Onsite
Development Services Division
On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
**** VARIANCE/WAIVER REVIEW ****
Waiver#: OSV161028 COSA#: Permit#:
PID#:050-315-24
Legal Description: Roseberry Ridge Estates #1. Tr C (Proposed Lot 1)
Engineer: Garness Engineering Group
Applicant:
Your request for a waiver of the required 50 feet horizontal separation from the absorption field
to the excessive slope has been approved. The approved separation distance is 20.0 feet.
This waiver approval applies to the proposed absorption field only. Any future upgrade to the
on-site wastewater disposal system will require all separation distances be met or another
approval from this department.
❑ The affected adjacent property owner(s) have been given a 7 day notice regarding this
waiver.
❑ Notarized letter(s) of nonobjection have been received from the owner(s) of the affected
adjacent property.
® Adjacent properties are not affected by this waiver.
son ................................... sesames ................................. I
Waiver is Granted: X Waiver is not Granted:
Date: 3 /6 Approved by:Name of of Review er
**** VARIANCEMAIVER REVIEW ****
Municipality of Anchorage ►:;
Development Services Division
On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
**** VARIANCE/WAIVER REVIEW ****
Waiver#: OSV161029 COSA#: Permit#:
PID#:050-315-24
Legal Description: Roseberry Ridge Estates #1. Tr C (Proposed Lot 2)
Engineer: Garness Engineering Group
Applicant:
Your request for a waiver of the required 50 feet horizontal separation from the absorption field
to the excessive slope has been approved. The approved separation distance is 25.0 feet.
This waiver approval applies to the proposed absorption field only. Any future upgrade to the
on-site wastewater disposal system will require all separation distances be met or another
approval from this department.
❑ The affected adjacent property owner(s) have been given a 7 day notice regarding this
waiver.
❑ Notarized letter(s) of nonobjection have been received from the owner(s) of the affected
adjacent property.
® Adjacent properties are not affected by this waiver.
...............................................................................
Waiver is Granted: X Waiver is not Granted:
Date: �J b 6 Approved by: LAr al_�
Name of Revi er
.......................................................y 0...................,
**** VARIANCE/WAIVER REVIEW ****
f
Municipality of Anchorage
Development Services Division
On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
**** VARIANCE/WAIVER REVIEW ****
Waiver* OSV161030 COSA#: Permit#:
PID#: 050-315-24
Legal Description: Roseberry Ridge Estates #1. Tr C (Proposed Lot 3)
Engineer: Garness Engineering Group
Applicant: _
Your request for a waiver of the required 50 feet horizontal separation from the absorption field
to the excessive slope has been approved. The approved separation distance is 0.0 feet.
This waiver approval applies to the proposed absorption field only. Any future upgrade to the
on-site wastewater disposal system will require all separation distances be met or another
approval from this department.
❑ The affected adjacent property owner(s) have been given a 7 day notice regarding this
waiver.
❑ Notarized letter(s) of nonobjection have been received from the owner(s) of the affected
adjacent property.
® Adjacent properties are not affected by this waiver.
...............................................................................
Waiver is Granted: x Waiver is not Granted:
Date: 3 36 /6 Approved by: teGU
Name of Reviewer/'
......................................................... .................
**** VARIANCEMAIVER REVIEW ****
- Municipality of Anchorage
Development Services Division
On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
**** VARIANCE/WAIVER REVIEW ****
Waiver#: OSV161031 COSA#: Permit#:
PID#: 050-315-24
Legal Description: Roseberry Ridge Estates #1. Tr C (Proposed Lot 4)
Engineer: Garness Engineering Group
Applicant:
Your request for a waiver of the required 50 feet horizontal separation from the absorption field
to the excessive slope has been approved. The approved separation distance is 0.0 feet.
This waiver approval applies to the proposed absorption field only. Any future upgrade to the
on-site wastewater disposal system will require all separation distances be met or another
approval from this department.
❑ The affected adjacent property owner(s) have been given a 7 day notice regarding this
waiver.
❑ Notarized letter(s) of nonobjection have been received from the owner(s) of the affected
adjacent property.
® Adjacent properties are not affected by this waiver.
...............................................................................
Waiver is Granted: X Waiver is not Granted:
Date: Approved by: L4 L-11 .1--
Name of Revie r
..........................................................f....................
**** VARIANCEIWAIVER REVIEW ****