HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHELL #1 LT 5Lo)T
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
(, *@F�7 MEMORANDUM
Date 19
To..
From:
Re:
r
Signed
91-015 (Rev. 1/81)
KELLICUT AND JONES
A PARTNERSHIP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
341 W. TUDOR, SUITE 102 - ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 WARREN G. KELLICUT
CALVIN R. JONES
(907) 561-2655 JANET D. PLATT
November 3, 1987
li
P1 C,i (J i.=C'.
Ms. Jewell Jones; rl
P. 0. Box 196650
Department of Health and Human Services �;J ;-
Municipality of Anchorage
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Re: -Lot 1 Block 5 ---Shell Subdivision
Donald and Dianne Lutz
Dear Ms. Jones:
As the attorney for Donald and Dianne Lutz please accept
this letter as the request of Donald and Dianne Lutz to reinstate
their request for financial assistance for an upgrade of their
septic system under the Emergency Septic System Upgrade Program
previously initiated by and through the Municipality of Anchorage.
As we have discussed on the telephone several times, the
system is in non-conformance with current Municipal and DEC
regulations in that the DEC has described on that property an
existing cesspool which the DEC is requiring be abandoned. Also
on that property for their single family residence, it is
necessary that a sewer upgrade be accomplished.
Should you need any specific information with regard to
the nature of the upgrade, you may contact Mr. Don Eng with the
Department of Environmental Conservation, State of Alaska.
Please find enclosed a copy of the Warranty Deed issued
to Donald and Dianne Lutz in December_ of 1984, describing and
explaining their current ownership of the subject property.
Due to the season, the nature of the request, and the
pending action by DEC against Mr. Lutz for his alleged violation
of existing ordinances, we ask that your agency consider this
request as one for "emergency relief". I understand that due to
the conduct of certain individuals, this emergency may have been
"created" but none the less it exists now because of the system
and the pending action by DEC.
Thank you very much for your
cooperation with regards to these matters.
Regards,
KEILLICUT AND
i
Warre Cf!/ire
WGK/pjw
Enc. Warranty Deed
cc: Lutz
7£3/42
consideration and
JONES
ic'6t
7UUIN r r w. .
` �®E WARRANTY DEED
B' P
(ALASKA)
&
The Grantor._, Theodore L and Litti,an 0,+ PotteA (husband and wi{e
1125 02d Oi'ympic Highway. PoA-t AngeZeh. Wohing-ton
1 Ilul- V 1 I I
residing at
----------
for and in consideration of the sum of One Hundred Seventy -Five Thousan -----------------
------------------Dollars ($ 115.000.00 ) in hand paid, CONVEYS and WARRANTS to
Dona Cd 6dWard and Diane MaA,i.e Lutz hu6band and wi6e)
, the Grantee
the following described real estate: SheU Subdivi"on Lot#1 i3Qock#5. 2.2 mit_u O'MaQQey Road
Anchorage. Atoka 99501.
situated in the State of Alaska.
DATED, this 3rd day of DeeembeA
lA 1984 .47
�LI
l nv
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ss, (individual Acknowledgment)
STATE OF ALASKA,,
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on thist5 h. day of December 19 84 , before the under-
signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
Donald E. and Diane M. Lutz and Theodore L. and Lillian G. Potter
to me known to be the person s described in and who executed the above and foregoing instrttdnenl,.and
acknowledged to me that the Y signed the same freely and voluntarily for the uses and pd posGS�wq� eJ1�
mentioned.
WITNESS My Hand and Official Seal the day and year �''j this certificate first abov,� 6vFa4t�b�.� ��!:• ,:.
ON-SITE SEPTIC LOAN PROGRAM: POSITION PAPER
I. Engineer
A.
Must conduct soil/percolation tests and water
monitoring.
Ail soil
strata to be utiized must be perched. (No
visual
soil ratings will
be acceptable).
B.
Must submit engineered design upgrade and
obtain
permit.
C.
Must be registered Civil Engineer on our
approved
list of design
engineers.
D.
Must have E & 0 insurance coverage.
E.
Must conduct two inspections and prepare
as -built
drawing.
II. Excavator
A. Be on our approved and permitted list of contractors.
B. Be bonded up to $50,000 for finished products.
C. Must have minimum of two bids (three or more preferred).
III. Environmental Health Division
A. Will review and approve (or return for redesign) engineered design
for upgrade. (Includes all soil/percolation tests, water monitoring
results, site plan, etc.).
B. Obtain necessary Right -of -Entry and Testing permit from property
owner..
C. Issue on-site sewer permit.
D. Issue Health Hazard statement with Dr. Wilson.
E. Review contractor's bids.
F. Be present on-site during both of the engineer's inspections of the
on-site system.
G. Review and approve as -built drawings.
RWR/ljw #5
I. A public health hazard shall be adjudged to exist when the installation
and/or operation of a single family on-site wastewater disposal system
results in one or a combination of the following conditions:
A. Raw sewage or contaminated effluent from the on-site system in
question appears on the surface of the ground in the form of pools,
damp spots or seeps and directly or spontaneouly affects adjacent
properties.
B. Surface water (i.e. stream, lake road side ditch or any form of
drainage run-off) is being contaminated by raw sewage or other
contaminated effluent and is traceable to the on-site system in question.
C. Raw sewage or contaminated effluent that is traceable to the on-site
system in question is degrading the underlying groundwater system
to the extent that public health is endangered.
D. Raw sewage or contaminated effluent attributable to the on-site
system in question enters into a private or community well or
other potable water source.
II. An on-site wastewater disposal system shall be determined as contributing
to or creating a public health hazard on the basis of an on-site testing
program. The testing program shall be conducted by the Department of
Health and Human Services under the direction of a registered civil engineer.
Tests shall consist of, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:
a dye test for tracing the path of contaminated effluent, fecal coliform
bacteria, nitrate, dissolved oxygen, total phosphorus and biochemical
oxygen demand as indicators for contamination of ground and/or surface
waters.
III. In the event an on-site wastewater disposal system is directly or indirectly
creating a public health hazard, the following format shall be used to
notify the homeowner(s):
"Based on a review as conducted by the Department of Health and Human
Services, of the subject on-site disposal system, and evidence provided
by a site evaluation and/or testing program, as outlined in Sections
I and II, it has been determined that this system is causing a public
health hazard."
Gus Andress, P.E.
Rodman Wilson, M.D.
IV. The following sequence of events would typically lead to the determination
that a public health hazard exists:
A. Information would be received by the Department of Health and Human
Services from the public, DHHS staff or other public agencies.
B. The on-site program within the Department of Health and Human Services
and under the direction of a registered civil engineer would technically
determine if a public health hazard exists. A technical investigation
would consist of an on-site visit by DHHS staff and the requisite
testing program necessary to make a valid determination.
Page Two
C. Following a review of the report for the on—site investigation
and the results of the testing program, the Medical Officer
within the Department of Health and Human Services would issue
a decision regarding the existance of a public health hazard.
D. A copy of the desicion pertaining to the existance of a public
health hazard would be extended to the homeowner (s) and the
Rehabilitation Program within the Department of Health and Human
Services.
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 10, 1987
TO: Gus Andress
FROM: Steve Morris s1"
SUBJECT: Request for declaration of "health hazard" in order
to obtai• '`)A emergency funds for upgrade of cesspool.
Alaska Environmer
^cervices has requested that an
existing cesspoo•
111bdivision be declared a
health hazard sc
merest financing may be
obtained by Mr.
lot. The existing
illegal cesspo(
surrounding
wells in the s
)lan shows the
location of a `•-
n question.
It should be ._4
about as a result
of some eng
r. Clifford Center,
who owns Lc
.utz. Apparently
AECS speci
,wledge of the
cesspool. -__
a cesspool was
discovers `'
:w Class C well. This
is in vi
requirement. As a
result e
ADEC has refused to
issue a
ie well. This has
prevent
property.
AECS *
:esspool a health hazard so
that
cz for the upgrade of his
ille
:y have provided a
cont
a conventional septic
Sys
.
Tr
aithin the required protective
r
(See attached site plan.)
t
probably does not constitute a
contamination of these wells is
.re not available for each of the
parent that wells in the
Sup_
y deep (150 feet plus) aquifers
which a.
ntaminated. Furthermore, the
cesspool app„
i operating for many years without
problems.
One of the wells was samp.L,.d on February 16, 1987. Although
the sample was positive for total coliform (three coliform per
100 ml) it is unlikely that this was a result of contamination
from the cesspool. Positive coliform results are fairly common
in old water systems like this one. The well should be
chlorinated and resampled however.
The cesspool does constitute a health hazard in the sense that
it will soon fail. The cesspool is old, must be frequently
pumped, and the wooden planks and plywood covering the open pit
are subject to further decay. The cesspool must be crossed to
reach the backyard and there is the possibility of the covering
caving in. If the cesspool is not pumped continually it will
overflow.
Mr. Lutz is in violation of Municipal and State ordinance by
operating this cesspool. ADEC will not issue a citation in
this case. Because the cesspool is part of a "community waste
disposal system" serving a multi -family dwelling, it is under
their jurisdiction. DHHS has not issued a citation in this
case because it was believed that an agreement was being worked
out between ADEC, AECS and Mr. Lutz that would deal with this
illegal cesspool and associated separation distance
encroachments.
Attached to this memo are copies of the site plan, septic
system design proposed for the Lutz property as submitted to
ADEC, soils test, photographs of the cesspool, and
miscellaneous correspondence involving this case.
ALASKA BUIROMMAL COnTROL SPURS, InC.
enymeerinq & 6ironmenial Studies
Feb-on'y 16, 18'r
MunicipwAy of Ayavn�wtr
Duprpmenc of health & Human Services,
825 4 Wrepr
00"-Yn-, Ainsvo MY
Min: Gus AKPY��
Re: VOL 5 Shell Subdivi0on No
60comulna rciop W Pelp tun is your poview or Ohio papkpi
-he imppsyt, "r KIS in V" pequpsl a ApCiappTinn OF health hazuN
AP S002 -or 70;
The heolp nRZaPH is posed by an Unsealed. Mug& CeSSPOW WhIlh
been opopated for an ondetermined number of yeals. The deulnwli n,
a hopith hazard is req p;ysa by san Hoorartl so ha, >a nunrlDO!!
vulz m2y qual,fy for municipal finannia, aid in reclifying
probiem by upg-adtng hN on slue qpp.;u FYYFem,
The P-00-gy lies with a COENIQ in sepotroLion Wslaines whiuk yng
�Uoa;vislnn nuc 'i ,C" n1H -P Y P A,V,;Pn!F". :nsl Y"Py
"C' w Wes put on IoO 3 Lo solve a lepurpWol, pr"hipm herwenn vh-
o t (1 -tio � rI& ,.,n n qYS i on Mir Unt veil nam King ON!:& i -he'
MAW- on Lot 1 not if NO ADEr by Wlephune uh0c ipt-pp Wns d renspor)
"n !go 7 WDIch Upy Z01P on veec an 'lei; well. P Na�. &4 "an
Weil in only 68 MY from the cesspool. The existonce of he cuosspo&
Wn q4T 04cuva-uO prior to this heranso 40 For An c: e
Ton tar= -..e oaken during the wiplur untl snow cover range n from
. lchpq n 1YO feer. -herp was no n"etl W yn:� �A-nuyh hc Preo of -&
cpsypino it Ypasurom;nuts nn6 henap pip Pot discovered 'lig Cl'_
pot!NrWoy wax -eveived. T MeL With WeVe MOrYN Or YnPC NPOCIMN
oncl jis [vyyen o7 tr v! MY ofriup PH together We visited the sive
.1 iD36. The rugnponl was 70cpWa pl: Mis ime pno SPWVU vn-yk,
'hough -ilaoinn Chu 6 he :ssuo& - in:y him OKI UP prohl,,
shoo i6 he nunkler in E dIp!nMVLjC MannOr TF POS05>
lavc-. lQ the suutmr- M proposvi YIE 71c =C cc AM fon Uelpownry 0161q,
onk which ops Witna in jone 1986. AK,I:.!onP] wp�
TOW PU me 'no lize Ulons onplpy-� Con L"p cu -,V- C-Pp"vyyl. P�
r h, Y,Ojy in ne,p11.
NO !& P:0 )nVal -nncnyoU. no, OPP- n ;�o :01P :11
Moan M87 showing 0 Droposeu Upgratic Vn Cho on MIN systems Du
5n r t : pom P Iq wo cop ?l
wo—o- wps lir n0t] in Fp4puH7,
-"Mo-otl 71(w H0PrPL:nr 00C nypvly pinq6nn"n,
1200 Wesl 33rd AMR, Suile B 0 Anchorage AIQSk0 99503 * (907) 561-5040
00 wy ! on P"; 50 C PP Q any jAPPIngwenr on AU Prwor-1w.
r-640-.
MY oFr;-N request chat you docia-v rhe !Ieqai cesspou, � pphn,
Henlil Anw-K in ppwo 9 An A-00"HA-1 Papopwrlk in prare& TO oil
eventual and Mely solurion in Q0 very gervious problem,
Shorld you N E !nnw P>Vse feel
Tel'_(; to conWL us.
Steve'. 7iF cc Ord
QVIi Tngkuvi''
App-oved by:
roti R -TP
ShPIAHOW''
ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL_ CONTROL
SERVICES, INC.
1200 W. 33rd Avenue Suite B
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503
(907)276-1-36-1--Slo /—SD�CJ
WE ARE SENDING YOU Ly'A Cached ❑ Under separate cover via_
L7 Shop drawings ❑ Prints Plans
ryCopy of letter [-j Change order F-1
LETTEN OF T°3QRME� 11 ` nA IL
DATE / /
(/!/
JOB NC
ATTENTION
RE:
-scyl t9
following items:
❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE 'TRANSMITTED as checked below:
REMARKS
❑ For approval
or our use
s requested
❑ Approved as submitted
❑ Approved as noted
❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE
COPY TO- G✓ ¢ --- -
PRODUCT r,O3 eoc i«, Or'" ?r ' sin -,.
❑ Resubmit_ copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
OF
P-
11
SIGNED:_ _per_
If enclosures are not as notod, kindly notify us t once. " j
ALASKA RUIRMOTAL COnTROL SHUNS, InC.
engmeerinq & Enuironmenlal SIudies
January 6, 1987
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation &
437 E Street, Saite 303 \G`QP�� of NEPRQ��Ct��
Anchorage, Alaska 99501 MSN QEp�• �N�P4
ENq�0.oNM \61
`\ �®
Attn: Steve Eng �/� ��`
Re: Lot 5, Shell Subdivision No. 1
Anchorage, Alaska 8621--DA-190
Dear Steve:
Please refer to the enclosed information for aid in reviewing this letter
and situation. Previous submittals have been made concerning proposed
solutions to the problems encountered in this particular area of the
subdivision and should be on file in your office. Cliff Center, owner of
Lot 8 has sent a letter to you and a copy is enclosed for background
information (Exhibit A).
The series of events leading to a denial of a "Certificate to Operate" for
Mr. Center on Lot 8, was based on the discovery of a cesspool on Lot 5,
located within the 150 foot protective radius of the Class "C" well (Exhibit
H). The cesspool was not detected prior to installation of the Class "C"
well on Lot 8. There is no sign of any system such as standpipe, depressions
in the ground, etc. In fact the cesspool in question did not come to our
attention until Curt Faildorf, owner of Lot 4, mentioned something to the
well driller. This denial was received on !larch 28, 1986 and resulted from
a site visit by Jim Hayden (ADEC), Steve Morris (DHHS), and myself (AECS) on
March 26, 1986. On April 8, 1986, Steve Morris and I went to Lot 5, took
photos of the cesspool and checked two small diameter steel standpipes which
were suspected by ADEC of being attached to a very old septic tank (exhibit
C). Further investigation revealed that, the standpipes were connected to a
fuel tank.
On or about June 13, 1986• a submittal was made to your office proposing the
installation of a septic/holding tank. A septic tank would have been
installed and used as a holding tank until such time that the owner of Lot
5 could afford to install a full on-site wastewater disposal system. This
was disapproved in a letter from your office dated June 26, 1986.
1200 101 33rd flue= We 5 • Anehoray f hAo 9993 • N07) 505040
On October 10, 1986, Mr. Center and I met with Mr. Lutz (owner of Lot 5) to
outline the series of events leading to the meeting, his legal obligation in
this matter, and the possibility of obtaining funds through the Municipality
of Anchorage, Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS) to help with
financing the upgrade for his sewer system. He expressed interest in
rectifying this matter but was concerned with availability of sufficient
funds to proceed with upgrading his wastewater system to meet codes. Mr.
Center and I met with Stan Hoofard (DHHS) on October 15, 1986 to discuss the
possibility that Mr. Lutz may qualify for grant money from the government.
An application form was acquired from Mr. Hoofard to give to Mr. Lutz, and
would be used to determine if Mr. Lutz qualified for any available funds.
The application was delivered to Mr. Lutz residence a few days later. I
called him in the evening to explain the reason for the application form and
to complete it and return it to Stan Hoofard. No word on status was given
as of November 3, 1986 so Stan Hoofard was contacted by telephone. Ile had
received no word at that time from Mr. Lutz. A proposal will be submitted
to Mr. Lutz which will outline work necessary to upgrade his system, a copy
of which is enclosed.
The June 13, 1986 submittal resulted .in a disapproval of the proposed plan.
The three items outlined in the letter of response will be addressed below.
1. Proposed plans for a permanent installation are enclosed for your
review.
2. Monies to finance the installation will have to be located through
available channels.
3. If the temporary holding tank scheme is used, a pumpingmaint.enance
contract will be established upon indication by your department that
approval is pending.
AECS, Inc., on behalf of Mr. Center, owner of Lot 8, Shell Subdivision No.
1, requests that the following action be taken.
Please review the enclosed proposed plans for upgrading the on-site
wastewater disposal system.
A waiver of distance from the Class "C" well on Lot 5 to the upgraded
absorption area is requested to 71 feet and 63 feet to the septic tank. The
cesspool will be properly abandoned during completion of the new
installation.
The location for the Class "C" well on Lot 8 is the best site for satisfying
all other separation distances for protection of the water source. If the
proposed system cannot be approved by your office, we request a waiver from
the Class "C" well on Lot 8 to the cesspool on Lot 3 to 95 feet, the Class
"C" well on Lot 5 to 72 feet, and the private well on Lot 4 to 68 feet
respectively. A "Certificate to Operate" for Lot 8 Class "C" well, upon
completion of work on Lot 5, is also requested. Once the proposed work for
Lot 5 is complete and everything is up to code a "Certificate to Operate"
will be needed for this property.
Finally, it is requested that ADEC notify Mr. Lutz, in writing, of his
obligations to pursue this matter and avenues of finance in a timely fashion
so that this work can be completed in an expeditious way.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 561-5040.
Approved by:
05
Sincerely,
/Ie4
�G
Steven F. Cords
Civil Engineer
cc: Cliff Center, 6800 Tall Spruce Drive, Anchorage, Ak 99502
Don Lutz, P.O. Box 3130-265, Anchorage, AK 99510
Steve Morris, 825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99501
Clifford
6800 Tall
Anchorage,
248-3587
December 19, 1,986
Mr. Steve Eng
District Engineer
State of Alaska
Dept of Environmental Conservation
437 E .Street, Ste 303
Anchorage, Ak 9.9501
S. Center lu c
Spruce .Drive �6
Alaska ,9,9502
or 349 7588
P\yGNa�'�R
a\C\PP p
MDpONE PRp E S \ON
Dt eNT PIN.
RE: Lot 8 Shell S/d #1 8621 -FA -114
Lot 5 Shell ,S/d #1 8621 -DA -190
Dear Mr. Eng:
Regarding the conversation on the afternoon of 7/2/86 with Mr.
Michael P. Lewis, where we discussed his letter to Alaska
Environmental Control Services dated 6/26/86, I wish to clarify the
situation. I have been trying to correct my well and septic system
for the past 3 years through the proper channels. Beginning in
February of 1983, in an attempt to refinance my triplex, I was told
that the septic tank had to be enlarged to 1500 gallons. The
refinance package was approved by the Municipality, $3,457.14 for
this improvement was placed in escrow, and work was to be completed
when the ground thawed. In the next year and a half, my out-of-town
job obligations kept me from coordinating a contractor to complete
the work.
In early 1985 when I pursued this project again, I found that the
construction permit had not only lapsed, but could not be renewed
because the. Municipality no longer had jurisdiction over this
project. After checking with DEC, I found that all the rules had
changed since my last permit was issued, specifically a 150'
requirement to separate the well and septic, which was not
previously addressed. Working with AECS, we researched the adjacent
plats and found that the Southeast corner of my lot was 130' from
the septic and did not infringe on other wells and septic systems,
and upon submitting a request for a variance from your office,
received a certificate to construct. After spending $7,000 drill a
well, I was then notified that due to the discovery of an .illegal
open pit cesspool on a neighbor's property, I could not get a
certificate to operate. This begins the argument of who missed
what. Since the cesspool in question was never registered, and
doesn't have any markings or proper vent, it was impossible to know
of its existence. Steve Cords of AECS and Steve Morris of the Dept
of Health and Human services inspected the cesspool and photographed
the area on April 8, 1986 and Steve Morris thought the situation
warranted an immediate issuance of a health violation. With the
hope of handling the situation diplomatically, Steve Cords suggested
that they notify the owner and look for a permanent solution.
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
0 MEMORANDUM
Date—
To:
From:
Re:
91-015 (Rev, 1/81)
Alt—
.e
tj
k
rv� 1A A
I -T
if, it
f, -
v -P
Signed
91-015 (Rev, 1/81)
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
0 MEMORANDUM
Date 19
To
From:
Re:
4o
11F
8
Signed
91 -015 (Rev. 1/61)
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
MEMORANDUM
19
From:
Re:
e)
0 X) v'?
Signed
W
J
91-015 (Rev. 1/81)
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
MEMORANDUM
Date 19
To:
From:
Re:
-'A'y
-A
J
Wz"
oil
91-015 (Rev. 1/81)
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Re'.
V
Signed
91-015 (Rev. 1/81)
Page 2
Now I'm at an impass. I have done everything in my power to comply
with the law of the land. The problem now lies with a neighbors'
illegal and unsafe system, standing between my certificate to
construct the septic upgrade, and the certificate to operate the
well. Now neither DEC or the Dept. of Health consider it a problem
unless as Mr. Lewis stated, someone gets sick from the raw sewage on
open ground. The owner of the cesspool in question wants to comply
with the law and has submitted a request to install a holding tank,
while he researches options to a permanent repair. Meanwhile, the
clock keeps moving ahead, summer is past and my excavation window is
closing. I have been unable to sell the house for 2 years because
of these problems and I want a solution.
AF.CS went to further expense to design a system compatible with the
neighbor's lot size and performed the soil tests. This submittal
resulted in a reply from your office that more information was
needed and some assurance that it would be installed in a timely
manner. Steve Cords and myself met with Mr. Lutz, owner of the lot
in violation, who seemed quite concerned about legalizing his
system, but did not have the funds. Further research was done and
Stan Hoofard with the Department of Health and Human services felt
that Mr. Lutz would qualify for a no interest loan. Stan then
attempted to reach Mr. Lutz, unsuccessfully, and then Steve Cords
delivered the necessary forms to Mr. Lutz. The time has come for
you to either grant a waiver for the cesspool and grant a
certificate to construct and operate my well and deal with Mr. Lutz
and help him upgrade his system. Ignoring the situation will not
make it go away.
Please assist me by solving the neighbor's problem so that I may put
my situation to rest..
Sincerely,
Clifford S. Center
DEPT. OF ENVIRON M1 ENTAL CONSERVATION
ANCHORAGE/WESTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
437 "E" STREET, SUITE 303
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
March 28, 1986
Steve Cords
Alaska Environmental Control
Services, Inc.
1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
BILL SHEFF*1hb, G0VtAA0R
SUBJECT: Shell Subdivision, Lot 8, Anchorage, Alaska
Class C Well, 8621—FA-114
Dear Mr. Cords:
274-2533
The operational certificate for the subject well cannot be
processed due to separation distance problems with a wastewater
system located on Lot 5, Shell Subdivision.
Please keep this office informed as to corrective measures
taken, if any, to resolve the problem.
JFH:pkk
cc: Steve Eng
Sincerely,,
1�
Ja es F. Hayden
Anchorage/Western District
Supervisor
/'/%n) 9,v -5>—z
,vAT� ' q���6G� T/Nle 'v 3 f•�v7
rii/31E�T ; c'�5 5 PUG' Z-!5
Z�1�Z-
tir/r�lf
L L ATDRIES, INC.
OLD.LA
*06HWAY
AN
046RAGE
1-I'd U44551
BACTERIOLOGII
BE
I.D. N0. (PUBLIC SYSTEMS)
NAME TEM
SYSTEM ADDRESS
CITY
LftwmRY I.D. #
�L WATER ANALYSIS
ED BSU PPLIER
TIME COLLECTED TYPE OF SYSTEM
AM ❑ PUBLICMINDI V I DUAL
PM
CIRCLE CLASS
A . B C dent a1
TELEPHONE NUMBER
STATE
LOCATION WHERE SAMPLE WAS COLLECTED
COLLECTED BY:(SIGNATURE)
ZIP CODE
TYPE OF SAMPLE
(CHECK ONLY ONE THIS COLUMN)
DRINKING WATER ❑ CHLORINATED
✓CHECK TREATMENT ❑ FILTERED
DW NTREATED OP OTHER
❑ RAN SOURCE WATER
❑ NEW CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIRS
❑ OTHER(Specify)
IS THIS SAMPLE A CHECK SAMPLE TO A PREVIOUS NON-CONFORMINL SAMPLE?
❑ YES bl�10 PREVIOUS COLLECTION DATE
ANALYSIS REQUESTED (IF OTHER THAN TOTAL COLIFORM)
SEND REPORT TO:(PRINT FULL NAME,ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY _lyr l STATE 1_ ZIP
BACTERIOLOGICAL WATER ANALYSIS RECORD
FOR LAB USE ONLY
Q4.TOTAL COLIFORMS
FECAL
COLIFORMS
a = m# mx
aan+ +
❑ RESUBMIT SAMPLE
Semple rejected because:
CHECK ONE OR MORE
❑ Sample too long in transit.
Sample should not be over 30 hours.
❑ Sample received too late in week
❑ Not in proper container
❑ Leaked out
❑ Insufficient information provided.
Please read instructions on form.
❑ Other (Specify)
RECEIVED FROM
RECEIVED /BY &4,
DATE a fl6E TIME 2;
ANALYTI ` METHOD:
MEMBRANE FILTER
❑ FERMENTATION TUBE
i
Date 6 Time Started 7zLf (o)I 7
Date 6 Time Completed o2bly 4':00
LABORATORY RESULTS
Anal st S' % _4 r 3
Other Bacteria 12ee�oorea
❑ Test unsuitable because:
❑ Confluent Growth
❑ TNTC
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY ❑
Membrane Filter: Direct Count Coliform/100ml
Verification: LTB yFbs�r rtiBGGB , J9Q617_1VL0_
final Membrane ll
fii�terrResults ;,f_ Coliform/lDOml
laepo ed SYN. d((.L61Aaaal ovate -46 -07
l.. . ' ^'! 6. •'M. X1."':1• .MD '4.F ' T -
-`-
Opp
y
.•i, �sN it" '} Sir. �S �:�Y ;=� - . ,:, - - -�
ALASKA RUIROf MenTAL COIITROL SCI UICeS, lnC°�
Engineerinq & Enuironmenld Siudles
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
DATEPERFORMED:
PERFORMED FOR:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 5ell 0 / '/et .S^
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
E
C
11
1
1
1
Township, Range, Section: 5-e. , i>~ 'T / i n1 /z 3 �J
SLOPE SITE PLAN
i.
s
f,
WAS GROUND WATER Lies
ENCOUNTERED?
IF YES, AT WHAT
DEPTH?
Depth to Water After
Monitoring? Date:
Gross
14 Reading Date Time
15 12 33 10 H5 /
3 6�
16 /Z q3
17 /2 �3 10 H 9 -13
rzy- iz
18 0 0 3-0 2 z
103 67
19 1 0 113 10 21
113 10 y q i G
20 PERCOLATION RATE/Z-8 i�3minules inch) PERC HOLE DIAMETER
�.J / 3 `3 1 .FT C..t 7<, c' •5 �1 . 4a4ly I sC" 1�
[j U /+
TEST RUN BETWEEN FT AND
.$M So , / i S r �Pcf al /76 Ll b r- li or �/�
COMMENTS //�1e /�errolufi�n
e,
ry� c•
SPI =L0 )
GS / u• 5�
e`o CERTIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
PERFORMED BY: �� `
S7 d'C 62
22 /fwf�Jf lys6 _.
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUMCI AL GUIDELINES IN E FE CN(iHIS DATE. iv1e E D�i`
00cM1201
�'y1 JET'.-jpa.
<l h 2201a Fl4f
I NetI Depth to I Net
Time Water Drop
A
`c
S ALASKA RIROWnTAL COnTROL SCRUIC65, InC.
a Engineerinq & l3nuironmenial Studies
1200 West 33rd Auenue, Suite B • Anchorage. Alaska 99503 • (901) 561-5040
TO
STATE OF ALASKA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
APPLICATION FOR ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER
SYSTEM APPROVAL
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Source of Water and Containment (Check all that Apply)
Legal Description of the Location
Treatment of Water (Check all that Apply)
L or 5 sHEL L 510 /,/a, /
❑ Private
SSG /s Ti�M 2 3 vv, Sr H, A�
❑ Roof Catchment
Applicant Neme I / r
POA
Ap hcant is: (Check one)
Bank ❑Certified Installer No.
❑ Other (Identify)
Owner/Builder
Atldress (Street or P.7O. Box: �1Type
4`f z Q rMAL «—i 94),
of Residence Total No. of Bmsedroo
❑�( Single Family
family)
j6 Multi -Family
City, State and Zip Code
Telephone
AA,14rHMA&6 , lq-<
Well Data
Send Approval td'.
❑ No
❑ Applicant XOther (Give Name & Address)
Is drainage directed away from or around the casing within a radius of 10 feet of the well casing?
II. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
Source of Water and Containment (Check all that Apply)
Type of Water Supply System
Treatment of Water (Check all that Apply)
❑ Well (Drilled or Driven! ❑ Surface (Identify)
❑ Private
❑None Chlorination
❑ Roof Catchment
❑ Other (Identify)
❑Public (Serves more than one
❑Filtration []Mineral Removal
❑ Holding Tank
family)
❑Other:
Well Data
Is the Height o! the Well Casing more than 12" above the Ground? ❑ Yes
❑ No
Is a sanitary seal installed on the well casing? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Is drainage directed away from or around the casing within a radius of 10 feet of the well casing?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Date Drilled Depth of Well (Feet) Static Water Level (Feet) Yield (If Available) Pump Rate (If qv ailab!e)
Gal: Min Gal/Min
Separation Distances from the Well Casing t0 each of the Following Sources of Contamination:
Septic/Holding Tank on Lot
Sewer Lines on Lot
Absorption Area on Lot
Closest Septic/Holding Tank on Adjacent Lot
Closest Sewer Lines on Adjacent Lot
Closest Edge of an Absorptiom Area on Adjacent Lot
If toxic materials are stored on the property, including fuel tanks, paints, lubricants and other petroleum
based materials, pesticides, fungicides or herbicides, indicate distance from
On Lot
On Adjacent Lot
contaminants to well casing.
Water Sample Taken by: Name
Sampler Is:
❑ Buyer. ❑ Engineer
Address –
0 Banker ❑ Government Official
Water Sample Results:
Attach Copy C Satisfactory - Date: ❑ Unsatisfactory Date:
Comments/Recommendations:
IIL WASTEWATER DISPOSAL
ate In al�40
..�
,❑
Septic Tank/Absorption System
No.
Package Treatment:
❑ (Specify Brand Name or Process! -
Septic Tank Size (Gallons) Number of Compartments
Holding Tank -
Specify:
Capacity of Tank
7000 &rtL
Where Waste is Disposed
ArYCfIekAhC ,VW. SEN! Sys
Frequency of Pumping
7 DRYS
❑
Septic Tank Outfall
Discharged To:
Dimensions/Size Soil Absorption System Ty Lty sl5rkk etoI or Soil
O th er-ISpecify):
❑ (Outhouse, Incinerator, etc.)
[7 New Svstem
ASF_ v' ^TCA f•
Name of Installer / s
dw 0
ate In al�40
..�
❑ Certified Installer ❑ Other:
❑ Owner/Builder
TypeManufacturer 0 * u *'
0000.. 000000•H��• i.../
No.
Soil Type or Rating
Septic Tank Size (Gallons) Number of Compartments
Soil Type or Rating 0000000000,0000• •00000
'Type/Quantity Backfill Material used for Soil
Absorption System
OY C. REID, 1 �� R
Adequacy Test Performed By:(Attach Copyof Report)
Date Septic Tank Pumped (Attach Copy of Receipt)
Type Soil Absorption System
Dimensions/Size Soil Absorption System Ty Lty sl5rkk etoI or Soil
Cleanout Pipes, Caps Installed on
Septic Tank
❑ Yes- ❑ No
- - Ab SyOstem 00•♦(�1 +
Separation
Distance to:
Water Supply Source on Lot
Feet
Percolation Test Results
nA
Percolation Test by: (Name) .�
Water Table;'Bedrock
Feet
Lot Line
Feet
Minimum Ground Cover over Absorp- Minimum Ground Cover over Septic
Cleanout Pip es/Caps Installed on
Cleariout Pipes Caps Installed on
tion area Tank
Septic Tank
Absorption System
Feet Feet
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Wate• Supply Source on Lot
N earest Water Supply Source on Adjacent
Nearest Body of Water
Water Table'Bedrock
Lot Line
Separation
Lot
Distance to:
Feat
Feet
Feet
Feet
Feet
Comments/Recommendations
I certify that the above information is correct:
Signature
Typetl; Printed Name - - -
Title, Reg. -/Cert. No., Inst. No.
Date
NOTE! Must be signed by a certified installer, professional engineer or DEC Staff.
❑ Existing System
Name of Installer
Date Installed
❑Certified Installer ❑ Other:
❑ Owner/Builder
No
Type/Manufacturer
Septic Tank Size (Gallons) Number of Compartments
Soil Type or Rating
Type Soil Absorption System
Dimensions/Size Soil Absorption System
'Type/Quantity Backfill Material used for Soil
Absorption System
Adequacy Test Results:
❑ Pass ❑ Fail
Adequacy Test Performed By:(Attach Copyof Report)
Date Septic Tank Pumped (Attach Copy of Receipt)
Minimum Ground Cover over Absorp-
tion Area
Feet
Minimum Ground Cover over Septic
Tank
Feet
Cleanout Pipes, Caps Installed on
Septic Tank
❑ Yes- ❑ No
Cleanout Pipes/Caps Installed on
Absorption System
F1 Yes ❑ No
Separation
Distance to:
Water Supply Source on Lot
Feet
Nearest Water Supply Source on Adjacent
Lot
Feet
Nearest Body of Water
Feet
Water Table;'Bedrock
Feet
Lot Line
Feet
Comments/ Recommendations
I certify that the above information is correct:
Signature
Typed%Printed Name
Title, Reg./Cert. No., Inst. No.
Date
NOTE: Must be signed by a professional engineer.
SEAL
Regfsrered Professio,,al
ALASKA RIUMPTAL COnTROL SCRUIRS, IN.
Enyneerinq & enuironmenlal Sludies
June 13, 1986
Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation
437 E. Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Attn: Mike Lewis
Re: Shell Subdivision No. 1 Lot 5
Dear Mike:
Over the past few weeks we have discussed this problem a few times. A
cess pool was discovered on this property which is in violation of State
Laws.
Economic conditions for the owner prohibit him from completely upgrading
his on-site system at this time. We propose a phased upgrade where this
septic/holding tank will eventually be used in an on-site septic system.
Due to the proposed system's close proximity the Class "C" well on this
lot, the new system would have and additional 500 gallon tank with the
chlorinating unit shown in the enclosed brochures. The disinfected
effluent would then he disposed of in a standard absorption area.
Based on this pian this office requests that you grant approval for
installation of the above outline tank, on this lot. If you have any
questions, please contact us.
Sincerely,
7,z
Steve Cords
Civil Engineer
Approved by:
eroy Reid i�., PhD., P.E.
Presid t
ALASKA RUIROnMenTAL COnTROL SCOUIRS, IOC.
Enqineerinq & Enuironmental Studies
SPECIFICATIONS FOR HOLDING TANK — LOT 5, SHELL SUBDIVISION
1.0 GENERAL
1.1 THE DRAW -NGS, SHEETS 1 THROUGH 3. SHALL BE PART OF
THIS SPECIFICATION.
1.2 ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONVENIAL
CONSERVATION (ADEC), THE CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT,
AND ALL APPLICAFLE RULES AND REGULATIONS
CURRENTLY IN EFFECT.
1.3 ALL ENCA'ATIONS AND DEPTHS ARE ADVISORY AND ARE TO
BE VERIFIED OR MODIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE
ENGINEER, OR INSPECTING AGENCY.
1.4 IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OR INSIALLER
TO ADHERE TO APPROVED DESIGNS FOR INSTALLATION, AND
TO MAINTAIN THE SPECIFIED SEPARATION DISTAN"ES, AND
TO HAVE APPROPRIATE INSPECTIONS 'BADE.
1.5 IF THE INSTALLATION IS NOT INSPECTED BY AN AECS
ENGINEER, AECS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
INSTALLED SYSTEM. AN ENGINEER AT AECS SHOULD BE
CONSULTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, TO SCHEDULE
THE INSPECTIONS THAT WILL BE REQUIRED AND TO
EXPLAIN WHAT THESE INSPECTIONS WILL INVOLVE.
2.0 HOLDING TANK
2.1 THE HOLDING TASK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 12—GAUGE
31/16 INCH THICK STEEL WITH BITCMASTIC COATING, SET
LEVEL ON UNDISTURBED SOIL, AND INSULATED WITH AN
OVERLYING LAYER OF 2 INCH BURIAL TYPE POLYSTYRENE
RIGID BOARD INSULATION.
2.2 THE HOLDING TASK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM
THE HOUSE FOUNDATION.
2.3 THE HOLDING TANK AND BED SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 75
FT. FROM ANY PRIVATE WELL OR BODY OF WATER, 100
FEET FROM CLASS C WELLS, AND 200 FEET FROM CLASS
A OR B WELLS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. PRIOR
APPROVAL OR WAIVER FROM ADEC IS REQUIRED FOR LESS
SEPARATION DISTANCE.
2.4 PIPING SHALL BE FITTED WITH A MECHANICAL WATERTIGHT
CALDER COUPLING ON THE OUTLET AND INLET AND
MANHOLES OF THE HOLDING TANK. PIPING SHALL BE
4—INCH DIAMETER SOLID PVC ASTM D3034 OR CAST IRON.
SLOPED A MINIMUM OF 1'4—INCH PER FOOT OR 2 PERCENT
,_a n r...n _._ RI -1 -' Ka,.�nan
WITH A MINIMUM OF' d FEET OF COVER.
2.5 CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DESIGNATED AND
CAPPED WITH AIR -TIGHT RAIN CAPS (JIM CAPS OR
EQUIVALENT), AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET ABOVE
GROUND LEVEL.
2.6 INSTALL AN ELECTRICAL ALARM SYSTEM THAT HAS A
BUZZER AND RED LIGHT WHICH IS IN PLAIN VIEW IN THE
DWELLING BEING SERVICED. BUZZER AND RED LIGHT SHALL
BE ACTIVATED AT A LEVEL OF 1.5 FEET BELOW THE TOP
OF THE TANK. A SWITCH MAY BE INST.ALLLED TO
DEACTIVATE THE BUZZER BUI NOT THE LIGHT.
2.7 ALL ALARM WIRING AND CONTROLS SHALL MEET NEC AND
MOA STANDARDS & CODES.
2.8 A PUMPING CONTRACT WITH AN APPROVED LOCAL SEPTIC
TANK PUMPING SERVICE SHALL BE OBTAINED & SUBMITTED
TO THE ADEC.
3.0 INSPECTIONS
3.1 HOLDING TANK ELECTRICAL SYSTEM INSPECTION MUST BE
PERFORMED BY A LISCENCED ELECTRICIAN.
3.2 HOLDING TANK INSTALLATION & PIPING SHALL BE
INSPECTED BY A PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER PRIOR TO
BACKFILLING.
ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL Joe __L_oT S_ 51/4[.4-_S1O No 7 -
CONTROL
CONTROL SERVICES, INC. SHEET NO OF
1200 West 33rd Avenue, Suite B
ANCHORAGE:, ALASKA 99503 CALCULATED By �� GoC'/�5 DATE 6Af1B(g _
(907) 561.5040
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE NTS
-iw-CAP4 'o 5o[-lp pl/G
AsrM P -3o34
fpKCklND it" r�
^1 Ge-EANoar
�� rr
4 Z R/6/12 BOAPD CAULOfiX
/NSUL A r/ON � COUI'L /N4 � i
7-77=:�
r
LE✓EL
I
min?� /NLEr P/PE
--
IIKii 44'0 SoGiO FVc
zoq> 9a�on 11 Asr�/ o-�03¢:
HOLD/NCS TANK (F�o/ f ow6Lcinty�
flf III�(I�II I (ISI
ME,PcUKY FL DAT 5w/rcH
�— "A L AKM LEVEL: "
q
--zo"�
ao�rv, w,�r� ri6aT co�E� avER
.
ACCESS HOG ES
ICi
I i
WALL Sjar-G TANK CQAIIECD /Ns/pE
L_J v
R\
µlinin
0447-N!/TX B/Tuy/a5r/C OK 4S41A L
FO,E' coeeos/oN F')2orEcT�cW
\
BAFFL 6 ' .
(i I
' USE WATA'P,��F ALAPr�'K WHE,�E
111 �i
ALAKM wItIA14 PE7lcriCArE5 TANK WALL
=��il� u/JDisrUREjED
SEr TANK oA/ 4/1,p/sr41.K OR
/NAr/vE
50/1-
co"PAcrED 570/4
ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL
CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
1200 West 33rd Avenue. Suite B
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503
(907)561.5040
JOB __��T s__ 5/r.s o ZJn - z
SHEET NO OF
CALCULATED BY <F (. Q'e�5 DATE CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE NTS
-jJM- CAP Vo 501-10 /wG
A/ A s rM D •3034
IaRCXfN.O fit"
4 ' 0"k'1610 BOARD
LJNSut A r/o�v
JrAin)
AJ
UIf
CGEAn/Our
CAUL PVC
y/(aH G /Qu/0 LEVEL i 2I f oO
MC IAJLEr P/P6 p,/_
ZoL'� �alla,-i Il A/TsOry o-�03�.
HOLD/Nh T4NK (F�oM ow�z�ialCr/ _
`—_ ME,PCL/�Y FLDAT SW1r'CH
"ALArM LEVEZ
C,RoUND SuRFAG � _
ll,jl��f
Z0"(0 aocmv, wArez 7-16yr cov6 o,16K
ACCESS NOLES
I��
WAGG SSG TANK CoATEA 1A/s 1DE
oar W/l7/ B/7'4lA1A571C oK E¢41A L
min
F-0,' caffOSIOW �2or€cneW
BSI ffL E
• USE WArFRP�ASF ALAPT�X N/NE,�E
AGAC'M Wlfe^14 P,5-AlE7;C,4>-r3 TANK WALL.
sI!411vD151-4190aD s,57- TANK oN vvP1Sr41R49Eii Of
,�NA TJ V E 5014. COMPA C rr-D -501L.
z
��r�w®4 0 j
Uoa®
EJ 83
to
a. V ; : o amt . ^ 3 �� t. H IL zw 1
H ��� :w,n Z • W N
j n e 1 ui (. w J
a /I.�o .�� ga
• u H soV. B p U ® '7
ei
J
O J YO w 2
U NQ z u
Q z I W W
ItJ Q U W N IL
Q
J Y a. M
U H W Qfr
D y (1J N ❑ ❑❑
0 _.1 � a.N
U) U
- � J to
i Q 4 Z rt
C9 O J Q I' -
H H M J [a U)
G C) O N H Q H
H O U IL 11_ Q
Y-
> J w U C7 IL
a z II X
aL in J Q a. 0
! 2 °w a u a a:
U G :9 z H Ir
z W H U HJ
I D a w
Q o H z u�
z U) Ili 1i w
Iil -1
IL W
IL H
z W W IL
IL
O Q IL
Q ' II
z 11.
z UI z Uto _a
W o %ap m
a Q" — °° ® k
a m ❑ G :� -�cn- 171,
111 IL ul
n v w � �
�_
✓�s�rv� �i a--6�� �
�z✓����, �'�rya C � v /f —�-� -��-� '������
/% , �--- n
��%lf� v ,. .i�„cJ" � /2�a�c �� r GC�'��G,c-o-vC.Gc -Gi ./el-=,��
ll�iiG•<t� o2�sY�G�-�� � ✓fie-LLt-�_t%e� o���ui/�'t-1
AP PROVED; r
DATR :LZ
r �. � TE . c . , F,"), ,� s z .E .,
MAUR AINCI 10R7AC E AREA i0ROUGl l DEPARTMENT OF Ei INIMMITAL (UALITY
ED/7
PPROVAL fl"^U_:ST FOP ''!ATE P, FACILITIE:
PAS L _r
!o
Jai
.fi"C'P;1G? SIT
C.
DISPOSAL FIELD
TOTAL
i1 i\EOUIRED :EASURE11-:"ITs
A.
tt: si
B
i
I!l LL TO SL-EPAGE PIT
C
,.,"LL TO T'.' ER
D.
WELL TO PROPERTY LI:'r
E1
!rLL TO 011 iCR ('OS^I`.:L" CO;:TAf lh iATIOP:'
F,
FOUMATION1 TO SEPTIC TAiIK' _
�1
FOUNDATI0[1 TO SEEPAGE PIT -- -
II
SEEPAGE PIT TO PROPERTY LIPJE�
31 C31HUM
TS
AP PROVED; r
DATR :LZ
r �. � TE . c . , F,"), ,� s z .E .,
MAUR AINCI 10R7AC E AREA i0ROUGl l DEPARTMENT OF Ei INIMMITAL (UALITY
ED/7
2,
3,
4.
MATER R A 1Ci 10 AGE AU WRIOUG1 I
C-PARTfIIEdT OF EVIRO11hIEf,'TAL l UALIN
3500 R ROAD
AiCHORAGE,ILALASKA 99507
27�-3�'3G
DATE :lECEIVED,'=:
TIME: lo ; u
RMUEST FOR APPROVAL OF
INDIVIDUAL SLl,!ER AM WATER FACILITIES
FOR F ,
u,)
APPROVAL REQUESTED DY',_- sler/Wefft Wbrqage Cc,
ADDRESS; - - -- _. 694- H Gth Me,. Anchorage, Al"ka 99501
PHONE: 272-9501
PROPERTY MINER._.._Mr.A Mrs. Larrry S� PEIOPIE;_ 344 18713
LEGAL DESCR I PT I Of J, IOt So ahell' Subdivision sj 1732
Alaska 89502NPL FACILITY TO LE INSPECTED: 53r81* Family STREET,_Anr;e,
---
IJUMGER OF LEDROO(,IS �_,__ 4 bedrom
5, UELL vATA4
(is Typ
B. DEPTIC.
D. CofdSTRucTIOr+ _ .. --
E. DACTER IAL Ai ZALYS
G. SE'JAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM;
A -SEPTIC TANK (IF HOMEP•IADE. SI -10..1 DIAGRAM ON BACK)
2,
3, fWUFACTURER—____.
4. I f JSTALLER..._._„_ ___„___
LC� r' � f
it