The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDENALY S-103885-10388 Denaly Platting Board Summary of Action January4, 2006 Page 6 within lot boundaries and under private ownership, and the need for any related plat notes. 23. Providing a temporary turnaround at the terminus of the unnamed east -west road within Phase 3 of the development. 24 S itting information for each additional liol- within is proposed subdivision to th-site Water an stewater Program satisfy the requirements sp 'fled by 21.15, AMC W a ( ��-� 15.55 and AMC 15. st be submitted. The P �` C ��lots in question , 1 t 8, 38, 39, 40 (and a I J �J tracts B 1, 3 , S, and 8 if the tracts are not n P design as open space). This ormation (� L include, but may not necessarily be 'ted T�� 5� Soils testing, percolation testing, and R�a� � � ground water monitoring must be ,p. conducted to confirm the suitability for f / development using on-site wastewater disposal systems. Ground water monitoring must be conducted during high ground water season in either the fall (October) or spring (May). G �< b. Areas designated for the original and replacement wastewater disposal system d1.. s �� '' sites must be identified and must meet all criteria specified in AMC 15.65 including Op L, O / �O slope and slope setback requirements. I () C. Topographical information must be �) submitted. d. An aquifer test shall be conducted within the proposed additional lots. This aquifer test shall include one pumping well and a minimum of two observation wells. The aquifer test shall show that there is an adequate water supply to .support the proposed subdivision and the effects of the Platting Board Summary of Action January 4, 2006 Page 7 oK pts o ONS -/I ` 9*4f e. �v0LF, ore P I+SF � FOK w Tµi P)4�s � appropriation of water to serve this subdivision on surrounding properties. The aquifer test shall be accomplished according to procedures outlined by this department. a The Petitioner is required to resolve with the n;Site Water and Wastewater Program eed to show the well and 100 foot setba radius on pr ed Lot 38. If the well wi e r ed for future use it must b umented by an engineer. R e area wl 'n lot lines in accord a with AMC 15.6 hall be sh on Lot 38 for potential was ter fsposal systems. f 1N 25. Making the following drafting changes: a. Street Names: Tikhatna/McIntyre is too close to Takota. Must use a different name. Bendilent Drive is currently named Mc Intyre Drive. Either this has to remain .Mc Intyre Drive or the circle at the north end must be given a unique name. (There can not be two Bendilent Circles). "Tikhatna/McIntyre Drive" is not labeled. b. Title Block Information: Denaly is spelled incorrectly. C. Map Information: Unity Park Subdivision is not labeled. Tract C-1 needs a Denaly Subdivision label. d. Including the average slope of each lot on the plat to assist in land use permit reviews. e. Amending sheet 1 of 3 to show the alignment of Tikhatna/McIntyre Drive which is shown on sheet 2 of 3. 26. Resolving utility easements. Municipality of Anchorage Development Services Department ` / Building Safety Division MEMORANDUM DATE: December 14, 2005 TO: Jerry Weaver, Jr., Platting Officer, CPD FRONT: eDaniel Roth, Program Manager, On -Site Water and Wastewater Program SUBJECT: Comments on Cases due December 16, 2005 The On -Site Water & Wastewater Program has reviewed the following cases and has these comments: S10388-4 Denaly Subdivision Information to satisfy the requirements specified by AMC 21.15, AMC 15.55 and AMC 15.65 must be submitted for each additional lot within this proposed subdivision. The lots in question are; I thru 8, 38, 39, 40, Tracts B 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8. This information must include, but may not necessarily be limited to: 1. Soils testing, percolation testing, and ground water monitoring must be conducted to confirm the suitability for development using on-site wastewater disposal systems. Ground water monitoring must be conducted during high ground water season in either the fall (October) or spring (May). 2. Areas designated for the original and replacement wastewater disposal system sites must be identified and must meet all criteria specified in AMC 15.65 including slope and slope setback requirements. -----3. Topographical information must be submitted. __.— _. — —� — �— 4. An aquifer test shall be conducted within the proposed additional lots. This aquifer test shall include one pumping well and a minimum of two observation wells. The aquifer test shall show that there is an adequate water supply to support the proposed subdivision and the effects of the appropriation of water to serve this subdivision on surrounding properties. The aquifer test shall be accomplished according to procedures outlined by this department. 5. The On -Site Water & Wastewater Program records do not contain documents for the water well system(s) on the proposed lot 38. An engineer shall properly document these systems prior to final approval of the plat. AC 4C 4C Zoe Mayor Mark Begich Municipality of Anchorage P.O. Box 196650 • Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 *Telephone: (907) 343-7900 Physical Address: 4700 Bragaw Street * Anchorage, Alaska 99507 • www.muni.org/planning Planning Department REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON PRE_k,l 1,INJ BDIVISIONS December 08, 2005 The Municipality of Anchorage has received application relating to the following preliminary plat activitv. _The hearin , slednesday, January 04, 2006 and comments must reach our office _ by ,' 4M" 005 in order to be included in the staff conditions of approval. Preliminary Plats to be heard: PREVIOUSLY ROUTED 810388-4 New subdivision: Denaly Subdivision REVISED Orin. subd/Legai: McIntyre Subdivision Request: A variance from AMC 21.80.240 (Cul-de-sac length) and AMC 21.80.330 (Design standards -Lot frontage and access). S11082-2 New subdivision: Bear Ridge Subdivision Orig. SubdIA9al: T1 3N R1 E SEC 4, Teri #2, Tract A (with variance) Request: A time extension request for Subdivision Agreement case 03-025. 511230-2 New subdivision: Lilleston Subdivision Orig. subd/Legal: TI 2N R3W Section 15, BLM Lots 41,42,46,47,48,49E,50,52,56,45A Request: 1 st 18 month time extension S11256-2 New Subdivision: Bernard Orig. subd/L.egal: Bernard Request: 1st 18 month time extension 311438 -1 Now subdivision: Simonson Tracts Subdivision Orig. SubdfLepal: Simonson Homestead Request: To subdivide one parcel into two tracts of land with vacation of the Right-of-way easement (Pete's Place) running north -south along the west property line; and vacation of a 10' Trail easement, a 10' Drainage easement and a 10' Utility easement running north -south along the west property line. S11439-1 New subdivision: Hillcrest Plaza Orig. subd/Legai: Hillcrest and Hillcrest Park #1 Request: DOUBLE SIDED * INDICATES CASES 1 OF 2 PAGES PREVIOUSLY ROUTED 311439-1 3W New subdivision: Hillcrest Plaza Orig. subd/Legai: Hillcrest and Hillcrest Park #1 Request: To subdivide 8 lots and 3 tracts of land into 4 tracts of land with vacations of a portion of a 20 ft alleyway running north -south adjoining Lots 1-6, Block 5, and a portion of a 20 ft T&E easement running east -west between Short Street and Old Seward Highway; and vacations of a 35 ft utility easement, a 25 It screening easement, a 20 ft drainage easement and 10 ft by 30 It anchor easement within the proposed Contrary Court right-of-way dedication. S11440-1 New Subdivision: Cross Estates Subdivision Orig. 3ubd/Legal: Heritage Hills #1 Request: To subdivide 2 tracts of land into 61 lots with vacation of an approximate 60 ft x 1,410 It Right-of-way easement (Our Road) running north -south between Talus Drive and Huffman Road Attached are copies of the proposed plats. Please submit your comments in writing, specifying any easements or other requirements that your department or agency may need. If no easements are required at this time, please provide a list of those plats to which there is "no comment' or "no objection". Sincerely, Jerry T. Weaver, Jr Platting Officer Enclosures December 6, 2005 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Community Planning and Development 4700 S.Bragaw Street Anchorage AK, 99517 Attn: Doug Lesh .�i S' 103 8 8 JAN 0 4 2006 Regarding: Denaly Subdivision S-10388-384 *- -�T► Dear Doug, Per your request dated November 18, 2005, we are providing the following additional information for the above referenced case. This response is part of request for a 2nd time extension for Denaly subdivision. The request is for a 60 -month time extension to construct both phases. As part of the application a variance has been requested for lots not adjacent to a public right-of-way. Also requested is a variance for a cul-de-sac length longer than the 900 feet allowed in a rural district. This is a phased development that will eventually provide through access and eliminate the cul-de-sac altogether. In addition, the cul-de-sac length is currently 915 feet, only 15 feet longer than allowed. Based on this information we request approval on the cul-de-sac variance. 1. Slope Calculations PHASE 2 Block 1 Lot 26 9% Lot 27 12% Lot 28 10% Lot 29 14% Lot 30 13% Lot 31 13% Lot 32 8% Lot 33 7% Lot 34 7% Lot 35 8% Lot 36 8% Lot 37 8% Lot 41 11% Lot 42 11% Lot 43 13% Lot 44 12% Lot 45 14% �. .. n , , �S0�P1 & �c F-7 77 530D A Street Aaftille, Alaska 99518 T 907-272-5451 F;,007 212-91165 S4 4[ 3181E Palmer tNaillla NigWil Seita 2 Wasifia Alaska 99654 4-'9117-351 F 9013519140 ' f /4\ Yc-� - ....1.�-..-�.+......3. ...�-...�..n ulcer r..a�. 4✓. ... W... ..1.. ...�• a .... �•W �.��F.: 1 Y. Denaly Sub. Page 2 Lot 46 16% Lot 47 17% Lot 48 18% Lot 49 21% Lot 50 20% Lot 51 19% Lot 52 21% Lot 53 19% PHASE 3 Tract 3 6% Tract 4 10% Tract 5 15% Tract 8 11% Block 1 Lot 38 8% Lot 39 11% Lot 40 13% Block 2 Lot 1 9% Lot 2 15% Lot 11% Lot 4 20% Lot 5 21% Lot 6 16% Lot 7 18% Lot 8 20% 2. The topography is now shown on the preliminary plat drawings. 3. The stream maintenance and protection easement is now shown on the plat. 4. Eagle River and the general flood zone is shown on the preliminary plat drawing as the subdivision is not located within the flood zone the flood zone contour is not shown on the plat. 5. The wetlands boundary shown on the original preliminary plat was not based on field survey data. The new preliminary plat drawing identifies all existing wetland boundaries lounsbury & associates, inc. Denaly Sub. Page 3 within the subdivision. Verification of the wetland boundaries may be requested by the Municipal Wetlands coordinator. 6. The lot configuration of Phase 2 has increased the density of the development. While the DUA of Phase 2 is over the .75 DUA required by AO 99-12, when the overall DUA Is computed for the Phases 2 and 3 the DUA is .55 and well below the DUA requirement. 7. No greenbelts are required by code and the new preliminary plat will not dedicated any greenbelts for common use. 8. The creek originally shown on lots 39 and 40 was been rerouted and not longer impacts the subject lots. As with the wetlands boundaries, verification creek may be requested by the Municipal Wetlands coordinator. 9. The new plat note No. 3 only identifies that the easement exists. With the development of Phase 3 new right-of-way will be dedicated to provide legal access. 10. The new preliminary drawing contains detail and dimension detail for Phase 3. 11. We are assuming that on approval of the original preliminary plat that Tract 5 was proposed as greenbelt area and therefore was conditioned to be dedicated to the homeowners as part of the plat approval. However, as there is no code requirement for greenbelts in this district the use as residential lots is allowed. The topography in the area is steep and some grading will be required to construct the driveways to municipal standards. The petitioner will work with MOA traffic and PM&E to resolve the driveway issue prior to recording the final plat. If it is determined that the steep terrain will not allow for 3 lots, a lot may be eliminated to allow for an adequate driveway. 12. The alignments of Tikhatna Circle and Tikhatna Drive have changed and new design drawings have been submitted to MOA Traffic and PM&E. This entire issue will be resolved as a condition of the final plat. 13. The intersection of Bendilent Drive and Tikhatna have changed and new design drawings have been submitted to MOA Traffic and PM&E. This entire issue will be resolved as a condition of the final plat. As always, please feel free to contact me with any further questions. Sincerely, Lounsbury and Associates Bradford J. Rinckey P.L.S. lounsbury & associates, inc. �j �'.� �! ♦> `.y' c/�*rvT . ;� �'- ice';i _ .', ,. •,. •: ,, � MunhapaldyofAndltxage Application {or Subdroision Variance.- PlanningD1%65ent r } , } �",PO Box 196650 ' < Anchorage AK 99519.6650, l _ � 1® s _�. 19L, _ ._'� lA .� � ._ , �..�...� _M1�af �..I, •rte Please fill in the information asked for below. T Y 03 9 8 oFC o 7 2t)Ft3 ' ', d. ♦y - a_ S'\'.. 1 :c .. '.Y rA�, .i' f..-.4, �:r :. .�'''.:/�.� .D 0.:-. i�.,1 �Y y� PETITIONER' PETITIONER REPRESENTATIVE (IFaN1� timet name usq Eklutna Incorporated Nam last name t) Lounsbury and Associates ling dress Centerfield Drive, Suite 200 ill dress 530�'A' Street Anchorage, AK Contact Phone: Day: 696-2828 Night Contact Phone: Day: P72-5451 Night FAX: FAX: 272-9065 E -mal: E-mail: b.rinckey@iounsburyinc.com 'Report additional petitioners or disclose other toowners on supplemental form. Failure to divulge other tleroelaail interest owners may delay processing of this appircabon. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Tax #(ooD-0oo'040ott): 067-062-06-000-06 Site Street Address: Denaina Drive Current legal description: (use additional sheet a necessary) Tract Al Denaly Subdivision I hereby certify that (I am)([ have been authorized to ad for) owner of the property described above and that I am petitioning for an subdivision variance in conformance with Title 21 of the Anchorage Municipal, Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the application fee is nonrefundable and is to cover the costs associated with processing this application, and that it does not assure approval of the variance. I understand that the burden of evidence to show compliance with the subdivision variance standards rests with me, the applicant OS Date (Agents anis( provide written prod of authortration) COMMENTARY The variance is for relief from the requirement to: Cul-de-sac lengths shorther than qOD Ft. The existing situation is: This is a phased development and future phases will create through traffic. Granting the variance will allow: The construction of the next phase with a cul-de-sac longer than800 Ft. Including a temporary turnaround. CODE CITATIONS AMC 21. 80.240 AMC 21. Accepted by':_ t �.y r . < f.I Poster 3 ARdavtt S '. „� I Fee ! I Case Number, Page 2 VARIANCE STANDARDS The Platting Board may only grant a variance if the Board finds that all of the following 4 standards are satisfied. Each standard must have a response in as much detail as it takes lo explain how your property's condition satisfies the standard. The burden of proof rests with you. Use additional paper if needed. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of the subdivision requiations would clearly be impractical, unreasonable or undesirable to the general public. This Is part of a previously approved, phased development. While it Is true that development of this phase will create a non -conforming cul-de-sac length, the next phase will connect to existing ROW and therefore conform to Municipal code. The granting of the specific variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area/ in which such DroDertv is situated. EXPLAIN: In no way will the granting of this simple dimensional variance have an Impact on public welfare, property, or safety. A temporary tumaround will be created, providing safe tumaround space for general traffic as well as emergency vehicles. Eagle River Road has similar road configurations along Its entire 10 mile length. In the past, this type of configuration has not created problems. Such variance will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of the subdivision regulations or the comprehensive plan of the municipality. EXPLAIN: The effect of granting the variance will not have a nullifying effect. This will be a temporary situation and will come Into conformance with the development of the next phase. Undue hardship would result from strict compliance with specific provisions or requirements of the subdivision regulations. EXPLAIN: Undue hardship will result if the variance is not granted, In that the subdivision has no other development configuration options. Slope, location of existing ROW and proximity to park land make this the only viable development configuration. Additionally, this type of variance has been allowed In the development of hundreds of subdivisions within the Municipality. SV (Rev. 01102)*Back Application for';Subd r ISM.,Variance Please fill in the information asked for below. r •- y � N Mumapaldy of Anchorage : 4 . Planning DePirtrirent t �' PO Boit ;196650 ' 3 :t r t >IAnchorege AK 99519.6650 i TY -rteport aaartronal peuhaners or alscose over co-owners on suiWememal roan. ranure to or ruge omen Deneuc al interest owners may oehay processing at mis appucaoon. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Tax #(ow400 oo-000): 067-062-06-000-06 Site Street Address: Denaina Drive Current legal description: (ase additional sheet a necessary) Tract At Denaly Subdivision 1 hereby certify that (I amyl have been authorized to ad for) Amer of the property described above and that I am petitioning for an subdivision variance in conformance with Title 21 of the Anchorage Municipal, Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the application fee is nonrefundable and is to ewer the costs associated with processing this application, and that it does not assure approval of the variance. 1 understand that the burden of evidence to show compliance with the subdivision variance standards rests with me, the applicant Date Signature (Agents must proMe written proof of awwrtatia,) n.Y 1 L• d it. l ' }. �'..1 h. •.i it �.... COMMENTARY The variance is for relief from the requirement to: All lots must abut a public ROW. The existing situation is: Two proposed lots do not abut public ROW. Granting the variance will allow: Creation of two lots that would receive access from a public use easement instead of public ROW. i <� : i:: _ l ': A:� l.. l:. '-.t 5-•�i.�� t:y � r 1 f ' '. v ,.�iSa.';; �' _ CODE CITATIONS AMC 21. 80.330 AMC 21. Accepted by _ Poster 6 Affldauit " ' ; - r< w.` PETITIONER* PETITIONER REPRESENTATIVE (IF Arm N3ne last name t) Eklutna Incorporated arse last name first) Lounsbury and Associates Mailing kdress Centerfield Drive, Suite 200 ili ares 530 "A' Street Anchorage, AK , Contact Phone: Day: 6966-2828 Night Contact Phone: Day. 272.5451 Night FAX: FAX: 272-9065 E -mad: E -mad: b.rinckey@lounsburyinc.com -rteport aaartronal peuhaners or alscose over co-owners on suiWememal roan. ranure to or ruge omen Deneuc al interest owners may oehay processing at mis appucaoon. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Tax #(ow400 oo-000): 067-062-06-000-06 Site Street Address: Denaina Drive Current legal description: (ase additional sheet a necessary) Tract At Denaly Subdivision 1 hereby certify that (I amyl have been authorized to ad for) Amer of the property described above and that I am petitioning for an subdivision variance in conformance with Title 21 of the Anchorage Municipal, Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the application fee is nonrefundable and is to ewer the costs associated with processing this application, and that it does not assure approval of the variance. 1 understand that the burden of evidence to show compliance with the subdivision variance standards rests with me, the applicant Date Signature (Agents must proMe written proof of awwrtatia,) n.Y 1 L• d it. l ' }. �'..1 h. •.i it �.... COMMENTARY The variance is for relief from the requirement to: All lots must abut a public ROW. The existing situation is: Two proposed lots do not abut public ROW. Granting the variance will allow: Creation of two lots that would receive access from a public use easement instead of public ROW. i <� : i:: _ l ': A:� l.. l:. '-.t 5-•�i.�� t:y � r 1 f ' '. v ,.�iSa.';; �' _ CODE CITATIONS AMC 21. 80.330 AMC 21. Accepted by _ Poster 6 Affldauit " ' ; - r< w.` Fee + ? Case Number �� w ' 1 1 '• , Page 2 Appkztw for Sub&&ion Vadance confined VARIANCE STANDARDS The Platting Board may only grant a variance if the Board finds that all of the following 4 standards are satisfied. Each standard must have a response in as much detail as it takes io explain how your property's condition satisfies the standard. The burden of proof rests with you. Use additional paper if needed. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of the subdivision regulations would clearly be impractical, unreasonable or undesirable to the general public. EXPLAIN: The area in question Is a notch In a larger portion of land limiting ROW design to serve the lots. The entire area is located In steep terrain which further limits ROW design. The lots are bound to the north by an Irregular shaped boundary which does not allow frontage on the public ROW. The granting of the specific variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which such property is situated. EXPLAIN: In no way will the granting of this variance have an impact on public welfare, property, or safety. The lots will still have physical and legal access through a public use easement created with this plat. Such variance will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of the subdivision regulations or the comprehensive plan of the municipality. EXPLAIN: The effect of granting the variance will not have a nullifying Intent because the lots will still have physical and legal access through a public use easement created with this plat. Additionally, the public use easement will only serve two single family lots so dedicated public ROW Is not required to handle this very small amount of traffic. The public use easement is essentially a driveway. Undue hardship would result from strict compliance with specific provisions or requirements of the subdivision regulations. EXPLAIN: Undue hardship would result If the variance is not granted, In that the subdivision has no other design options. Limiting design features such as the irregularly shaped north boundary of the parcel and the steep terrain make the proposed design the best solution for this area. The land would essentially be unusable without this variance. Additionally, this Is a situation that Is granted frequently In similar areas like this In Eagle River and on the Hillside In Anchorage. 8V (Rev. 01/02)*Back Roth, Dan J. From: Lesh, Douglas A. Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:36 PM To: Roth, Dan J. Subject: Denaly Subdivision - Case S-10388-3 Dan, With regard to Denaly Subdivision and the request for a second 18 month time extension, I am sure you have noticed that this new plat is quite different from the plat that was originally approved back in 1999. As it is a second time extension we need to come up with a whole new list of conditions of approval. While it is fine to recommend the same thing as was recommended in 1999, there are a few issues that may be of particular interest to you which you might want to address. 1) What was originally Tract 2 (within Phase 3 of the original preliminary plat) has been replaced with lots 39 and 40 on the new plat. These lots were highly impacted by the creek setback which was shown on the plat as originally approved (and interestingly enough is no longer shown). It is my understanding that Steve Ellis with Watershed Management thinks the creek still is there. Therefore he will likely require that they delineate the creek setback on the plat. This leaves the issue of whether or not these lots can accommodate a well and septic system. Would you like a condition placed on the plat that requires them to prove that these lots can accommodate a well and septic? If so if you could provide a condition for inclusion that would be great. Or possibly the standard conditions cover this? 2) On the original preliminary plat as approved, there was a well located on Lots 47 and 48. This well is no longer shown. I don't know if it is there or not, however if you would like a condition or to show the location of the well or provide evidence that it has been decommissioned if you could provide a condition to that effect it would be appreciated. The original Summary of Action with the conditions of approval has been attached for your review. If you have any questions, or need a copy of the plat as was originally approved by the Platting Board back in 1999 I can bring that over to you. Thanks, Doug aj 200512081218526 2.pdf (930 KB)... Platting Board Summary of Action March 3, 1999 Page 7 10) Obtaining a determination of side and rear yards for Lot 33 from Land Use Enforcement and resolving the need to redesign the lot to meet AMC 21.80.300.1) or to obtain a variance from the Platting Board. 11) Resolving the need for a wetlands permit prior to any disturbance within the 100' creek setback with the Army Corps of Engineers. — 6-W 12) Resolving the need to reconfigure Lot 55 to exclude the area within the 100' stream setback and/or the need for a plat note prohibiting any disturbance within the stream setback with DCP&D. 13) Obtaining approval of all location(s) to access Eagle River Road that meet sight distance standards from ADOT. 14) Resolving the need to provide a second access from the subdivision to Eagle River Road from prior to submitting a final plat for Phase II and III. 15) Resolving the need to vacate the private access easement extending east from the west property boundary with DCP&D. 16) Obtaining approval from Traffic Engineering to ensure that roads are constructed to provide adequate sight distance at intersections or at vertical curves and that roads do not exceed Municipal standards for grades. 17) Providing trail connections linking this property to Eagle River Road and walkways to the Eagle River Greenbelt, location and width to be resolved with Parks and Beautification and Transportation Planning. Submitting information to Department of Health and Human Services to satisfy the requirements specified by AMC 21.15 and AMC 15.65 that includes, but may not necessarily be limited, to the following: • Platting Board Summary of Action March 3, 1999 Page 8 (a) Soils testing, percolation testing and ground water monitoring must be conducted to confirm the suitability for development using an on-site wastewater disposal system. Ground Water monitoring must be conducted during high water season in either the fall (October) or spring (April -May). (b) Areas designated for the original and replacement wastewater disposal system sites must be identified and must meet all criteria specified in AMC 15.65, including slope and slope setback requirements. (c) Topographical information must be submitted. 4 (d) Supporting documentation on water availability must be provided. 19) Showing the following on the plat: (a) The 100' stream protection setback required by AMC 21.40.115.F.3; (b) the surveyed boundaries of the Type A and Type B wetlands on the plat; (c) The 100 -year floodplain boundary on the plat; (d) the detail for the intersection of Hideaway Court extended and McIntyre Road and indicate the transition from the 50 -foot to the 60 -foot wide right-of-way, and >• (e) Any conditions required by the Corps of Engineers, if a wetlands permit is required. 20) Placing the following notes on the plat: (a) "Portions of this subdivision are situated within the flood hazard district as it exists on the date hereof. The boundaries of the flood hazard -\ Municipality of Anchorage • "` Development Services Department Building Safety Division" s. ,. MEMORANDUM DATE: September 23, 2005 TO: Jerry Weaver, Jr., Platting Officer, CPD FRO1l: Obaniel Roth, Program Manager, On -Site Water and Wastewater Program SUBJECT: Comments on Cases due October 14, 2005 The On -Site Water R. Wastewater Program has reviewed the following cases and has these comments: t:_,S 10388 =-3---Denaly SiMNiiion -'18 month time extension request" No objection to time extension, all other past comments still apply S11058-2 Bruin Park First Addition Subdivision No objection, public water R sewer shall be extended and serve all proposed lots S11415-1 Girdwood Elementary School No objection S11418-1 Forest Heights Subdivision No objection, public water R sewer shall be extended and serve proposed Tract A R B S11419-1 Lampert Subdivision #5 No objection S11420-1 Raspberry Center No objection NEW PLAT APPLICATION FRAME 1 APPRAISAL INFORMATION The current par. Owner PARCEL ID 067-041.09-000 cel Is Legal Desc R Description Zone deactivated or Grid Invalid. SOFT ADD NEW CASE OR ACTION Sale Pending ❑ Entered By PreCV Enter Date Odg. Application Date Case Number S10388-- Action ID Subdivision 1 Denaly Subdivision -18 month time extension torrent McIntyre Subdivision, A and unsubdivided Legal '114 Original Subd [McIntyre Subdivision *(NOT ROUTED)' N 11 land located within the N 112 of the SW less the NE 114 of the NE 114 of the NE 114 & SW 114 of the Site Add SE 114 (North Portion) and SW 114 of the NW 114 of Planning g No property address available p... Qe VA w W, ••a dl 1 w w hl. Qn 1.. 11 Location Exsisting Lots [2] Proposed Lob l Southwest of Eagle River Road and north of the t6 Eagle River Greenbelt. Requestr ubdivide 1 tract and an unsubdivided portion of land Into 63 and 6 tracts. _ Remarks RECORDED:2000-012102.24-00(PHASE1)TIME EXTENSION -EXPIRES: 09-02-05 COMMUNITY COUNCILS 0'01 Eagle River Valley T P Community Council as r y shown In CAMA data d P e e r Type: P - Primary CC S • Secondary CC PETITIONER Last Name Eklutna Inc. b Jack White Development Address 3201 'C"Street First Name Day Phone Night Phone C' 1( J c . J E-mail `[, City choroge Fax# I`) State [AK I Zip [99503 REPRESENTATIVE (SURVEYOR) Surveyor Bus. Name F. Robert Betl b Associates Address 801 Fireweed Lane Last Name Bell First Name Boh [ Day Phone (90T) 2745257 Night Phone O City [Anchorage E-mail Cfrb@alaska.net I State AK Zip 995031801 Fart [(907) 272-7531] DOCUMENTS E A E E A E A E E W D E D D E D D E D Long Plat Copies (42)0 ❑ Aerial Photo 0 0 Site Plan 0 A Short Plat Copies (32)0 ❑ Housing Stock Map 0 Authorization V Reduced Copy (8.5 x 11) Zoning Map a Survey Waiver Affidavit Fee Drainage Plan ❑ ❑11 As Built Pedestrian Walkways 0 Topo Map (4 copies) 0 0 0 Certficate to Plat[] Landscape Req 0 Soils Report (4 copies) 0 0 0 Waiver Remarks I NFW PI AT APPI lnATIniJ FRAME 9 CASE INFORMATION S10388 Case NumberAction ID Parcel ID 067-041-09-000 2 Owner REMARKS & COMMENTS Remarks SOA mailed 03-0&04 RECORDED: 2000-012102.24-00(PHASE 1) ASSOCIATED PARCELS Parcel Parcel ID Acres Owner Count. Zone Legal 06704109000 98.06 06706206000 64.63 EKLUTNAINC 1 H R10SL—� Additional Owners Total Acres 162.69 CAMA Site Address Grid HEARING DATE Action Subdivision approval time extension Number ID Case 510368 Actionr2] Authority Platting Board Type g [Consent Agenda I Hearing 0110312004 Date Click to Set Action (Hearing) Date—>> With this hearing date it will have taken 63 days to process this case. 03103/2004 No CASE SCHEDULE If no date, field does not apply to Authority Type Hearing Date 03/03/2004 Public Hearing Notices 02/112004 Last Day Appear 02/06/2004 Cut -Off Date 01/132004 Legal In Newspaper 02/092004 Route Cases 01202004 Affadavit Due 02/182004 Assign Cases 01212004 Staff Packet I Reports Due 02/232004 Joint Case Review 02/032004 Packet to Print 02/212004 Agency Comments 02/132004 Deliver Packet 02/272004 Legal Ad to PIO 02/042004 Post App Meeting 01/142004 PLAT FEES Fee Code Proposed Lots 69 GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. . �--CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS �, August 4, 2005 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health & Human Services Division of Environmental Services On -Site Services Section P.O. Box 196650 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 Ref: Exploratory Wells for Proposed Denaly Subdivision Phase 2, We request a well permits to have three exploratory wells on the proposed lots 32, 45, and 46 of Tract A-1, Denaly Subdivision for the purpose of subdivision. Attached is a site plan for the proposed well locations. Atter completion of the wells, a draw down test will be performed on these three wells for the purpose of subdividing the properties. If you have Ai y questions, please contact us at 337-6179. Thank you for your assistance. P.E., M.S. 3701 E. Tudor Road, Suite 101 *Anchorage, AK 99507 Ph: (907) 337-6179 * Fax: (907) 338-3246 * Website: gamessengineering.com GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS S GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3MI c n •vo. w 101 • AIC -OWL m w ? • n ' W)"77 i» • rw (w) e " • �v.•...«ghwgw.. SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE 12, PROPOSED LOT 26 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/10/2002 DEPTOR; (feeTEST HOLE 26 1ORGANICS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SOIL QLAS TlI• CLOCK TIME GW I •� •' IIIIIIIII 6/10/2002 1 II�III!IIGM%//a.CL - /.%GCNNN • 'SWIIIIIIIII 1:09 � iiia. 3 1/4* • SC — SP TO SM w/ GM LENSES THROUGHOUT DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 12' 6/10/2002 11'-2' 6/19/2002 SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/10/2002 1 12:59 - 6' — 2 1:09 10 3 1/4* 4'3 2 3/4- 3 1:09 — 6' — 4 1:19 10 3 1/2- 2 1/2' 5 1:19 — 6' — 6 1:29 10 3 3/4- 2 1/4" 7 1:29 — 6' — 8 1:39 10 3 7/8- 2 1/8- 8'9 9 1:39 — 6' — 10 1:49 10 378' 21 8' 11 1:49 — 6' — 12 1:59 10 3 7/8" 1 2 1 8' 19� PERCOLATION RATE 4.7 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: E YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. 1, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: O - GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.ooc,'`: CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS O a LEGAL DESCRIPTION:DENALY SUSDMSION• PHASE f2, PROPOSED LOT 27 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 6/10/2002 DEPT ORGANICS (feet) ---- TEST HOLE 27 GM/ML E 7 FT 12 6'— 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18-4 o 14 151617 18 DATE 16' SP TO SM 15' 6/19/2002 W/LENSES M 1'11111 IIIIIIIII ��aaaaa, THROUGHOUT ��aaaaa ��aaaaa NNIIIII • ��aaae■a I%I/I/II% I 12 6'— 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18-4 o 14 151617 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 16' 6/10/2002 15' 6/19/2002 IIIIIIIII ��aaaaa, ��aaaaa ��aaaaa NNIIIII • ��aaae■a I%I/I/II% I ��, IuIIIJI q.6.� • 4*44 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 16' 6/10/2002 15' 6/19/2002 SEE ATTACHED DRAWING 19 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS P RFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: B : 0 aaaaa ��aaaaa, ��aaaaa ��aaaaa ��aaae■a 19 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS P RFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: B : 0 GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS IJVIL LVV - rCR%.VLAI1Vl`1 ILJ11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE k2. PROPOSED LOT 28 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 6/10/2002 ((ee1 DEPTH ORGANICS �I H I I I I II TEST HOLE #2781 wmllillllll® 3 5 -... 9. 6/10/2002 ...,... .; ..,. 6/19/2002 •:.0.00 SP W/ 111111111 •9. 111141 6 .. ;.. •• SM LENSES rA .;;; ;: THROUGHOUT & 7 :;_'; ; SOME GRAVEL 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 9. 6/10/2002 9'-10' 6/19/2002 �t•aaaa� 111111111 111141 ��aaaaa %//% rA NNE • r,�aaaaa 111111111 r,�aaaaa' ��. 11 ky` DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 9. 6/10/2002 9'-10' 6/19/2002 �t•aaaa� A, : v d rys�0�1 ..w . ............. '{ a A, orness: CE— 3 SEE ATTACHED DRAWING 19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) �I�—f'I TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES 0 NO SJALS LOuGEG BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS /P FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 43 0 • • aaaaa �t•aaaa� ��aaaaa r,�aaaaa r,�aaaaa' 19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) �I�—f'I TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES 0 NO SJALS LOuGEG BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS /P FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 43 0 o A Cv^�s��l _GAR_ NESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. �� .4 y •'••:y a.•+..-..�.+ CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 7101 L AU OW. SUFE 101 • NjoloWL N •5701 • .110ME: (W)M7-9179 • M (907AW-72N • 1OeSOL• ,wny w oY wW4.t0„1 • SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE 12. PROPOSED LOT 29 O •' e e A. arness;' PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/10/2002ACV It QOop M CE (fee ORGANICS �O �oleaallo TEST HOLE 29 00000 1 GM/ML 2 3 4 5 ... 10' 6/10/2002 9'-10' 6/19/2002 '::•: S• SP W/ • • IIIIIIIII 6 111191 SOME SM LENSES %//% a SOME GRAVEL 7 :;:; ; THROUGHOUT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 10' 6/10/2002 9'-10' 6/19/2002 > IIIIIIIII ��aaaaa 111191 %//% MM, ��aaaaa '��aaaaa HNN • !�+� IIIIIIIII � �I1I�tIl �� • DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 10' 6/10/2002 9'-10' 6/19/2002 I,��aaaaa SEE ATTACHED DRAWING 19� PERCOLATION RATE 1.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEC, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THISWA E FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: S S • • 99909 I,��aaaaa ��aaaaa !��aaaaa ��aaaaa '��aaaaa 19� PERCOLATION RATE 1.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEC, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THISWA E FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: S S GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. ------ ----�� CONSULTANTS 3 GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBOWISION; PHASE g2, PROPOSED LOT 30 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 6/10/2002 DEPTH (feetFR. ORGANICS TEST HOLE 31GM/ML 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SM W/ ML LENSES THROUGHOUT DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER SOIL DRY 6/10/2002 DRY GW GP 11:39 SP •R ML — 2 12:09 30 4' 2- CIL 12:09 — 6' — 4 12:39 30 SW 2- MH 12:39 — SID — CH 1:09 30 SM X OH ;. ,a ,�� SC SM W/ ML LENSES THROUGHOUT DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE DRY 6/10/2002 DRY 6/19/2002 11:39 — 6' — SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/11/2002 1 11:39 — 6' — 2 12:09 30 4' 2- 3 12:09 — 6' — 4 12:39 30 4' 2- 5 12:39 — 6' — 6 1:09 30 4' 2- 19 PERCOLATION RATE 15 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WASER ORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 6 S S G_AR_N_ISS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3701 L NW011 Now, SW IL 101 • MHCHW A"C w 99W7 • P - (YO)W73 119 • rut (W7) -32M • M TL Va^�w^W`ro.wrn SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDMSION; PHASE A2, PROPOSED LOT 31 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/10/2002 (fePTH et) ORGANICS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 1 CLOCK NET TIME TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS — — 1GW =zzzl ORG • IIIIIIIIIML — 1 11.111!11GM%//%CL 6' HHH /00 • 0_% IIIIIIIIIMH SP CH II!llllliX • .. ,.. �•�,.Sc DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 9. 6/10/2002 9. 6/19/2002 SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK NET TIME TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6 11 2002 1 — — 6' — 2 — 1 0' 6' 3 — — 6- 4 — 1 0' 6- 5- 6 — 1 0' 6' PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT. A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑YES NNO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH CALL P(1MMrNTC- PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WASR ORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 0 GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS iwi L7iwaa -naw. r..: co»ue-.u.e • •rasnc: o•�.»•ro�•••ro••• SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE #2, PROPOSED LOT 32 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH ____ (feet) ORGANICS TEST HOLE #3221 1 GM/ML PERCOLATION �•�:•:• SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS .•...�• GW ORG .. �.•.• GP ---- ML �•: i i• GM CL "�'•'• •• SP GC OL q •••• .�.•.�• :.•.• �. •0• o SW MH SEE ATTAC H E D 5 •: •••• • • • • SP CH ':�•:•: .. ;.:.• SM , ' °" DRAWINGSC ': �': •: 7 �. DEPTH DATE �• GROUNDWATER 8 5.5' 6/11/2002 5.5' 6/19/2002 9— to- 1011 CLOCK NET TIME WATER LEVEL NET DROP DATE READING 11 TIME (MINUTES) READING (INCHES) 6/11/2002 1 — — 6" — 12 2 — 1 0" 6" 13 3- 4 — 1 0" 6- 14— 5 — — 6" — 6 — 1 0" 6- "15161718 15- 16- 17- 18— PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.0 FT. AND 4.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES E NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARAIH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY CEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PEWORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: ' GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3701 L TUDOR NOW. SUNS 101 • M,C"WN L MC 99507 • N - (W)337] 179 • FN (610793 1241 • K TL ,nwwp+wNp.m„ SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE A2, PROPOSED LOT 33 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTum (feeORGANICS TEST HOLE #331 K 3 SP WITH ...... a .:��: LEML/CLOP THROUGHOUT 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 3.5' 6/11/2002 2.5' 6/19/2002 31191 vZZ04, ✓/% NNE • 1111111111 w 4 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 3.5' 6/11/2002 2.5' 6/19/2002 SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK NET TIME WATER LEVEL NET DROP TIME (MINUTES) READING (INCHES) 19� PERCOLATION RATE _ (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. — (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN FT. AND FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ❑NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: CON,IJENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: g 1 _GARNESS .ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. ,..e....e....�..ve. CONSULTANTS E GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3701 L T O RYO. SUIE 101 . NKnOMGE, F 00307 • 0104[: 007)337-6170 • F" 007)336-33N • • TL pnw.rq•r0p.iem SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE #2; PROPOSED LOT 33A PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 (feet) ( ) ==-- ORGANICS GM/ML TEST HOLE 33 I "A�l°PFoiesslo^oc� �00000� 1 SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS 2 SM W/ 'b-0`• GW ccc_ ORG SP LENSES ;7--,4 GPIML 3 THROUGHOUT GMCL q GCOL �.0 '. •'. o SWMH SEE ATTACHED 5 0.0. . . ' SPCH �•�� 66;64.• �'"''' SC °" DRAWING 6 •• 4.44 sc 7 SP .; GROUNDWATER DATE �...'41 8—: 9' 6/11/2002 9. 6/19/2002 y 4.44 4.44 4646• ��•� '� CLOCK NET TIME WATER LEVEL NET DROP 11 DATE READING TIME (MINUTES) READING (INCHES) uo.H 6/11/2002 1 — — 6' — 12 2 — 2 0' 6- 13 3 — — 6' — 4 — 2 0" 6" 14 5 — — 6' — 6 — 2 0' 6" 15- 5161719 16- 17- PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.0 FT. AND 4.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS jPEqFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3701 L 111000 POW. S XM 101 • MKnON4L I 99W • RIG.E: (90])]]1-91]9 • FN 901)339-32N • M TL ,arl.•,•.n99.•rY.p.wrn SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE A2: PROPOSED LOT 34 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH ^^ ORGANICS let) -II j[� II I I II TEST HOLE 34A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GM/ML SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS 7' GW 7'-10' 6/19/2002 .- - IIIIIIIIIML Ililll!11GM%//%CIL ��aaada /.�GC HHII • SOME 06 GRAVEL - IIIIIIIIIMH .CH I;Itl�ls; • ,�Sc DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 7' 6/11/2002 7'-10' 6/19/2002 ��aaaaa ..... ... . . .. ......... . .................. p •• a ey . orness: e CE_79f e` S RScsQc SEE ATTACHED DRAWING 19� PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.0 FT. AND 4.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY CEG. Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PEWORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 8 0 • •• aaae�a', ��aaaaa ��aaada ��aaaa� 19� PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.0 FT. AND 4.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY CEG. Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PEWORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 8 0 GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3701 L1U00N NCO, WT[ 101 • / "W7 . PI,GIL YO] ]-6119 • F/ i07 -3)N - WASM yvmw-,p�rr� SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION PHASE 12; PROPOSED LOT 34. PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 7/11/2005 PH (feet) ORGANICS TEST HOLE 348 1 DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 8.5' 7/11/2005 4��y. .......°. vJ......... �... ey A. Garness: CE -79 3Ja i°Q�oG ,Pro f eseio�°ate/ SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING rr NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) SOIL CLASSIFICATIO�5- rr rr — 6- r 2 r CM 0' 6' 3 r — r — 4 I GWtzzz::- 0' 6' OR rr rr — 6' — 6 rr rr GP 0' nuuulMLI rr rr rr rr rr I r1 I II �II!11GM H/NN•CL GC OL SM IIIIIIIIIMH I I - %//%CH SM%'.G� • Sc DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 8.5' 7/11/2005 4��y. .......°. vJ......... �... ey A. Garness: CE -79 3Ja i°Q�oG ,Pro f eseio�°ate/ SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING �r rr NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 7/11/2005 1 rr rr — 6- — 2 rr rr 2 0' 6' 3 r — r — 4 rr 2 0' 6' 5 rr rr — 6' — 6 rr rr 2 0' 6 - rr rr rr rr rr r1 DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 8.5' 7/11/2005 4��y. .......°. vJ......... �... ey A. Garness: CE -79 3Ja i°Q�oG ,Pro f eseio�°ate/ SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 7/11/2005 1 11:08 — 6- — 2 11:10 2 0' 6' 3 11:10 — 6- — 4 11:12 2 0' 6' 5 11:12 — 6' — 6 11:14 2 0' 6 - PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 2 FT. AND 3 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES NO SOILS LOGGED BY: KELLY HEISTUMAN PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: JORDAN TROISI COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS& GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE 12; PROPOSED LOT 35 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH ____ 6' TO 8" (feet) CF CRV,+.%:CJ TEST HOLE 35 2--I nli{flwGCLSLENSE SAS 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 71 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE X-2- 6/11/2002 3- 6/19/2002 3- 5/7/2004 2. 8- 5/17/2004 ��aaaaa ��aaaa� K-700 ��aaaaa. NNE • ROW ��aaaa� 1 1111111 iiio. DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE X-2- 6/11/2002 3- 6/19/2002 3- 5/7/2004 2. 8- 5/17/2004 SEE ATTACHED ,ffinlaAluo 19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) -Jjl-1II TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.0 FT. AND 2.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, LTD. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WA P RFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: loom • • aaaaa ��aaaa� ��aaaaa ��aaaa� ��aaaaa. ��aaaa� 19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) -Jjl-1II TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.0 FT. AND 2.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, LTD. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WA P RFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS S GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE #2: PROPOSED LOT 36 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH ____ 6' TO 8' (ft) OF ORGANICS TEST HOLE7j 36 2A P111111 w GCL LENSES 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 • • •• • 3'-2' 6/11/2002 3' 6/19/2002 3' 5/7/2004 ' 5/17/2004 III111111 6- ;11191 — 6- %//% 4 — 5 0' 6- BRIM — U.N.rM — 6 — 111111111 0- 6- MIN WI DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 3'-2' 6/11/2002 3' 6/19/2002 3' 5/7/2004 2' 8- 5/17/2004 SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/12/2002 1 — — 6- — 2 — 5 0- 6- 3 — — 6- — 4 — 5 0' 6- 5 — — 1 6" — 6 — 5 0- 6- 19 I I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) _—jll—lll TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.0 FT. AND 2.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 9 1 S aS GAIINESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBOMSION; PHASE p2: PROPOSED LOT 37 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA. INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH ____ 6' TO 8' (feet) OF ORGANICS TEST HOLE #37] 3 3 I1N1If1Nw/CLSLE SES 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 4- 6/11/2002 3- 6/19/2002 3- 5/7/2004 2. 8' 5/17/2004 2 3:12 10 11191 2 1/4- 3 MOO, — 0f — 4 NNE 10 • 2- 5 3:22 11111111 6- — 6 3:32 10 4 1/4- 1 3/4- 7 3:32 — 6- — 8 3:42 10 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 4- 6/11/2002 3- 6/19/2002 3- 5/7/2004 2. 8' 5/17/2004 �� ... ..... - - ys;�� of 4 ..�. .. . ...... ........... SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/12/2002 1 3:02 — 6- — 2 3:12 10 3 3/4- 2 1/4- 3 3:12 — 6- — 4 3:22 10 4- 2- 5 3:22 — 6- — 6 3:32 10 4 1/4- 1 3/4- 7 3:32 — 6- — 8 3:42 10 4 1/2- 1 1/2- 9 3:42 — 6- — 10 3:52 10 4 1/2- 1 1/2- 11 3:52 — 6- 12 1 4:02 10 4 1/2' 1 1/2" 19� PERCOLATION RATE 6.7 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.0 FT. AND 2.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. -- -- CONSULTANTS 3 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3101 C MOOR 9WD. 9UOE 101 • Aho" OL M 99507 • PMOW- (9010-9119 • FN (90)"-32N • 9.4 TL 9enrwwp:w-+p.enn SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE #'2, PROPOSED LOT 41 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA• INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH ____ (feet) a==_ ORGANICS ITEST HOLE #4fl 1 K 3 4 II 1111 TLENSESIN OP 3 FEET 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 6.5' 6/11/2002 5'-10- 6/19/2002 4:38 — 6- — - 5:08 IIIIIIIII 4 3/4- 111191 3 5:08 MOO, 6' rZA 4 5:38 NNfI • MY 5 5:38 IIIIIIIII 6- RINI - 6:08 ��. 4 3/4" 111911! �id� • M�;; DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 6.5' 6/11/2002 5'-10- 6/19/2002 4:38 — 6- — SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/11/2002 1 4:38 — 6- — 2 5:08 30 4 3/4- 1 1/4- 3 5:08 — 6' — 4 5:38 30 1 4 3/4- 1 1/4- 5 5:38 — 6- — 6 6:08 30 4 3/4" 1 1/4 - PERCOLATION RATE 24 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 2.5 FT. AND 3.5 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: 2ACHARAIH GALL PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WASP FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 0 GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3701 L IUOOR 1lp.0, SuOE 101 • M,CMOM.GE. N 69302 haltW)W71 1)Y • FN W)3 -32N •f851iE: P^ "V^w�^Y.m^ SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE /2, PROPOSED LOT 42 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH (feet FILL MIXED TEST HOLE 42A w/ ORGANICS 2 3 6 I �If1#1 LENSES 1 I}}tl}(}f+}1 W/ ML LENSES THROUGHOUT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 it 1 •' 111111111 31191 %//% i MINIM 111111111 Ow - %//% EE ATTACHED 111111! V,", • K!`i! DRAWING DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 10' 6/11/2002 11' 6/19/2002 tl�aaatl�a PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT. A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. 1, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAq E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: ii D . • • aaaaa tl�aaatl�a ��aaaetl�a tl�aaa�a tl�aaaaa �t1laaa�tla t!tltl!■�tl�t�� PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT. A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. 1, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAq E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: ii D GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE A2, PROPOSED LOT 42 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH ____ (feet) —�y_ ORGANICS TEST HOLE 42B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GM/SM W/ ML LENSES THROUGHOUT • ��YNLiiI•Tm CLOCK NET TIME TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/11/2002 1 Rm 6' — 111111111 2 111!11 0' 6- %//% 3 /.% 6" — URN 4 • 0' 6- 111111111 — — 6' — 6 — 4 0" 1111111 7/N� • a DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER DRY 6/11/2002 DRY 6/19/2002 SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK NET TIME TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/11/2002 1 — — 6' — 2 — 4 0' 6- 3 — — 6" — 4 — 4 0' 6- 5 — — 6' — 6 — 4 0" 6' 19� PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PER170R ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: d GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS d GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OENALY VIEW SUBOWISION; PHASE /2; PROPOSED LOT 43 PERFORMED FOR: F. ROBERT BELL AND ASSOCIATES DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH ____ (feet) 33�_ TEST HOLE 43 1 =3a= ORGANICS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS 4- 6/11/2002 GM/SM/ML GW 4:40 •' 6' GP 2 ML 30 3 3/4- 2 1/4" CL 5:10 /_%GC HHII • 4 SW 30 MH 4'5 2 1/4- 5 5:40 CH W/ ML LENSES77`- SM�/. 6 • 30 3 3/4- 2 1/4- SC DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 4- 6/11/2002 3--7" 6/19/2002 4:40 - 6' - SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/11/2002 1 4:40 - 6' - 2 5:10 30 3 3/4- 2 1/4" 3 5:10 - 6' - 4 5:40 30 3 3/4- 4'5 2 1/4- 5 5:40 - 6" - 6 6:10 30 3 3/4- 2 1/4- 19 PERCOLATION RATE 13.33 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 1.5 FT. AND 2.5 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: • �S 0 GLtd.ARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, �,., T •. I CONSULTANTS S GENERAL CONTRACTORS• • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE d2, PROPOSED LOT 43 YO u rr PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA. INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 QQ CE- DEPTH (feet) ___ FILL MIXED TEST HOLE 43 _ 1 z_» W/ ORGANICS 8� Jill ENEG LENSES THROUGHOUT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 11' 6/11/2002 •CLASSIFICATIONS 6/19/2002 ��aaaa� I.GWI • . ��aaaa� IIIIIIIIIML ��aaaaa I��IIGM N/HNA CL • 0.,00 SWI�IIIIIIIMH �1ltllll;SMBaa • SC 8� Jill ENEG LENSES THROUGHOUT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 11' 6/11/2002 11.5' 6/19/2002 ��aaaa� SEE ATTACHED DRAWING t9 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PERQbRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: aaaaa ��aaaa� ��aaaaa ��aaaa� ��aaaaa ��aaaaa t9 PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.0 FT. AND 5.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES ENO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PERQbRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd.�; CONSULTANTS d GENERAL CONTRACTORS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE /2. PROPOSED LOT 44 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPT ORGANICS (reef) — -- TEST HOLE 44 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SOIL GP TOGP/SP QLASSIF14BBOW •. GW zzzz: 10' GP MIL (�HIM CL /.iGCNNN 5:25 • 1" SW MH 5:25 - CH. - SM OH 10 SC 5" DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 9. 6/11/2002 10' 6/19/2002 5:15 - 6" - A� .............. .... ............. A. Ofne55.- SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6 11 2002 1 5:15 - 6" - 2 5:25 10 1" 5- 3 5:25 - 6" - 4 5:35 10 1" 5" 5 5:35 - 6" - 6 5:45 10 1" 5- 7 5:45 - 6' - 8 5:55 10 1" 5" 9 5:55 - 6" - 10 6:05 10 1" 5- 11 6:05 - 6" - 12 6:15 10 1. 5" 19 I I PERCOLATION RATE 2 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) -SIJ- JII TEST RUN BETWEEN 3.5 FT. AND 4.5 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES [-]NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WASP FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE A2: PROPOSED LOT 48 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/12/2002 DEPTH ____ (teey —�—__K__—^_w ORGANICS TEST HOLE 4 1 --II it I ti�1l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GM/SM w/ SOME ML LENSES DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER • 10' 'mm>�C 10'-8" 6/19/2002 4:14 • - 6- — 2 4:44 30 2" 4- 3 4:44 — /.% — 4 REHM 30 • 3 1/2- 5 5:14 1I n — 6 5:44 30 2 1/2' 3 1/2 - 2- ODE DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 10' 6/12/2002 10'-8" 6/19/2002 4:14 — 6- — SEE ATTACHED DRAWING mob DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/12/2002 1 4:14 — 6- — 2 4:44 30 2" 4- 3 4:44 — 6- — 4 5:14 30 1 2 1/2- 3 1/2- 5 5:14 — 6- — 6 5:44 30 2 1/2' 3 1/2 - 2- 19 PERCOLATION RATE 3.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.5 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ONO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH CALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: SOS GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. - ---- — CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS 0101 L AIW11 RYD, iURC 101 • N4.0WLL MC YYW] • Fn01G-(W1)M7] 572 • FA (W)SX-M" • F[85M 9... q�rYp.wn SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE A2; PROPOSED LOT 46 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA. INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH �fe1) 0 ORGANICS TEST HOLE 46A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 GM/ML SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS 11.5' 6/11/2002 12' 1GW :zz::::: .. 4i, GP111111111ML ��aaaaa 11:111!11Gm%//%CL ��aaaaa /.%GCNHH OIL IIIIIIIIIMH ��aaa�a 0 CH X111111;• • ... SC.. SP TO GP/SP W/ SM LENSES THROUGHOUT DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE 11.5' 6/11/2002 12' 6/19/2002 !��aaaaa SEE ATTACHED DRAWING ®®®® •'•' !��aaaaa ��aaaaa ��aaaaa ��aaaaa ��aaa�a PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES E NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. 1, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS E ORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 8 OS' GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. •--•-•-•--- +.- CONSULTANTS 3 GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBWASION; PHASE 12; PROPOSED LOT 46A PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/11/2002 DEPTH =__= ORGANICS feet TEST HOLE 468 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS DRY 6/11/2002 DRY t ORG Gp ML CL /.%GCHHH • SW MH ilio.CH SMmoo • ,:•SC SP TO GP/SP W/ SM LENSES THROUGHOUT DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE DRY 6/11/2002 DRY 6/19/2002 ��aaaa� SEE ATTACHED DRAWING 19� I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) II II TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: IN ACCORDANCE • • aaaaa ��aaaa� ��aaaaa ��aaaaa ��aaaaa ��aaaaa 19� I PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) II II TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES N NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: IN ACCORDANCE GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. . +----•-�-�+� CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: GENALT 5UeUNINUN VHASE Nr, eKuvuocu PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA. INC. DEPTH ____ ORGANICS (feet -11 Ll l l ll 11 TEST HOLE 47 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE DRY 7/11/2005 DRY 7/28/2005 1 •. 6- — 2 111111111 30 31191 6- 3 WZ004 — /.% — 4 NNN • 1 0. 6. 5 IIIIIIIII — 6. — 6 3:29 30 0- lilllli �/��. • DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE DRY 7/11/2005 DRY 7/28/2005 1:59 — 6- — SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 7 11 2005 1 1:59 — 6- — 2 2:29 30 0. 6- 3 2:29 — 6. — 4 2:59 30 1 0. 6. 5 2:59 — 6. — 6 3:29 30 0- 6. 19 I ( PERCOLATION RATE 5.0 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 6 FT. AND 7 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: KELLY HEISTUMAN PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: CALEB GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 0 c:- GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS b GENERAL CONTRACTORS ]701 L 10000 PMO. SOOE 101 ' NKIgPAOL N 99507 ' Pltl,i (907)337—•119 ' FN (907)339-31M • KBS1L pnwP.npiwYp.Pem SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE #2, PROPOSED LOT 48 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/10/2002 DEPTH ____ (feet) -�3_ ORGANICS TEST HOLE #48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GM/SM DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE SEEP m 15' 6/10/2002 DRY 6/19/2002 ��aaaa� 111111111 31191 vzz/oll ��aaaaa /.% 1 URN • ��aaaaa IIIIIIIII . Illllli �id� • DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE SEEP m 15' 6/10/2002 DRY 6/19/2002 ��aaaa� SEE ATTACHED DRAWING 19 I I PERCOLATION RATE 1.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) -CJI-JII TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WA P EgRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: • •• aaaaa ��aaaa� ��aaaaa ��aaaaa ��aaaaa ��aaaaa 19 I I PERCOLATION RATE 1.5 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) -CJI-JII TEST RUN BETWEEN 6.0 FT. AND 7.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: 0 YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WA P EgRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNLSS ENGINLLRING GROUP, Ltd. o� 4 y CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS � O O . ..... .. ...... .......... 3701E MOON R0.0, SUIS 101 • N,C110MG4 M 99301 . P,1p,C: W7)337- In • Fu S07)3 32" • •EB30L Svmrwq„wbS.eun SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST DENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE N2, PROPOSED LOT 49 ( e Garness: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: o CE -79 3 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DATE: 6/10/2002 pp04 ^e . •4 DEPTH ORGANICS ��4p�o sv0000 TEST HOLE 49 1 SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS 2 GW =--- ORG 3 :a+it GP ML GM CL 4 GC OL fee 0 SP CH SEE ATTACHED 6 SC 5 °" DRAWING 7 81IAIiliil GM/SM 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 14' 6/10/2002 14' 6/19/2002 DATE READING CLOCK NET TIME TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/10/2002 1- 2 — 5 0' 6- 3 — — 6' — 4 — 5 0" 6' 5 — — 6- 6 — 5 0' 6 - PERCOLATION RATE <1 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: ❑ YES 0 NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS E FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 8 GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3701 L 190011 90 0, WIE 101 • NK1109i4( N 99507 h1011E: 90))337-1179 • F"- 907J.U1-37N • 9E TL yvnwrpwwrYp_fam SOIL LOG — PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OENALY SUBDIVISION; PHASE 12, PROPOSED LOT 50 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA, INC. DATE: 6/10/2002 DEPTH____ (feet) ___� ORGANICS ITEST HOLE #5701 2 3 4 5 61IpI111 vrGMISM / SP POCKETS 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS 7�`+k GP ML GM CL GC OL s". SP CH SEE ATTACHED S ''' °" SC DRAWING DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE t2' 6/10/2002 11•-8' 6/19/2002 3:45 — 6- — DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/10/20021 1 3:45 — 6- — 2 3:55 10 3 1/2- 2 1/2- 2"3 3 3:55 — 6" — 4 4:05 10 358' 238" 5 4:05 — 6' — 6 4:15 10 358- 238" 7 4:15 — 6' — 8 4:25 10 358' 238' 9 4:25 — 6" — 10 4:35 10 3 3/4- 2 1/4- 11 4:35 — 6' — 12 4:45 1 10 3 3/4' 2 1/4 - PERCOLATION RATE 4.4 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEC. Ltd. I. JEFFREY A. GARNESS. CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS p FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: 1 O GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDIVISION: PHASE /2; PROPOSED LOT 51 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA.INC. DATE: 6/12/2002 DEPTH (feet) ORGANICS TEST HOLE 51 1 K A 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GM/SM DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 10' 6/12/2002 10' 6/19/2002 SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME HIM WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6 12 2002 1 •. — 6' — 111111111 4:26 31191 1" 5- MOE 4:26 /.% 6" — NHH 4:36 • MOW 5" 5 111111111 — ow - 6 iiio. 10 IIIIIII 5- 7 1'o • 6" — 8 DEPTH TO DATE GROUNDWATER 10' 6/12/2002 10' 6/19/2002 SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6 12 2002 1 4:16 — 6' — 2 4:26 10 1" 5- 3 4:26 — 6" — 4 4:36 10 1" 5" 5 4:36 — 6" — 6 4:46 10 1" 5- 7 4:46 — 6" — 8 4:56 10 1" 5- 9 4:56 — 6- — 10 5:06 10 1" 5' 11 5:06 — 6" — 12 1 5:16 1 10 1"1 5' 19� PERCOLATION RATE 2 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) TEST RUN BETWEEN 4.5 FT. AND 5.5 FT. 20 A PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: E YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS FERYORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Ltd. CONSULTANTS 6 GENERAL CONTRACTORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DENALY SUBDMSION: PHASE /2; PROPOSED LOT 52 PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA,INC. DATE: 6/12/2002 DEPTH (teet--11191tT7;1lORGAN:CS ITEST HOLE 52 t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GM/SM/ML DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER • SEEP ® 12.5' mm 9.5' mm •' - 6' 111111111 2 111191 30 %//a. 4'3 2 3/4- /.% 4:48 MIN • - 4 111111111 30 � 2'5 2 1/2- iiia. 5:14 � I1:,; 6' �,�a • 5:48 30 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE SEEP ® 12.5' 6/12/2002 9.5' 6/19/2002 4:18 - 6' - SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 6/12/2002 1 4:18 - 6' - 2 4:48 30 3 1/4- 4'3 2 3/4- 3 4:48 - 6' - 4 5:18 30 1 3 1/2- 2'5 2 1/2- 5 5:14 - 6' - 6 5:48 30 3 1/2' 2 1/2- 19 I I PERCOLATION RATE 12 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. 6 (INCHES) -Jjl SII TEST RUN BETWEEN 5.0 FT. AND 6.0 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ❑ NO SOILS LOGGED BY: JODY MAUS PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: ZACHARIAH GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEC, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS, CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: GARNESS ENGINEERING GROUP, Lt ��• CONSULTANTS & GENERAL CONTRACTORS —� SOIL LOG - PERCOLATION TEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: utrvuT auourviniv. �� s - PERFORMED FOR: EKLUTNA INC. DEPTH —_ ORGANICS (fee ITEST HOLE - 5N DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE SEEP 0 12' 7/11/2005 10' 7/28/2005 • - — 6. — 111111111 2:32 II.III!11 0' 6 3 2:32 — 6� — 4 Hum 30 0' 6. 5 3:02 — 6. — _ 3:32 30 0' I lilt: ��6 • DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER DATE SEEP 0 12' 7/11/2005 10' 7/28/2005 2:02 — 6. — •0 :*l .. f ,ro r mess SEE ATTACHED DRAWING DATE READING CLOCK TIME NET TIME (MINUTES) WATER LEVEL READING NET DROP (INCHES) 7 11 2005 1 2:02 — 6. — 2 2:32 30 0' 6 3 2:32 — 6� — 4 3:02 30 0' 6. 5 3:02 — 6. — 6 3:32 30 0' 6. PERCOLATION RATE 5.0 (MIN./INCH) PERC. HOLE DIA. b (INLHtW 19 TEST RUN BETWEEN 5 FT. AND 6 FT. 20 A FOUR HOUR PRESOAK WAS PERFORMED: N YES ONO ^,AFD BV: KELLY HEISTUMAN PERCOLATION TEST PERFORMED BY: CALEB GALL COMMENTS: PERFORMED BY GEG, Ltd. I, JEFFREY A. GARNESS. CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PE !FORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE: g U