HomeMy WebLinkAboutVILLAGES VIEW ESTATES WEST S-10764Villages View
Estates West
5-10764
Municipality of Anchorage
Development Services Department
Building Safety Division '" •'•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 06/18/01
TO: Jerry T. Weaver, Jr., Platting Officer, CPD
TROi11: qeVrI6 Cross, PE, Program Manager, On -Site Water & Wastewater
SUBJECT: Comments on Cases due June 29, 2001
The On -Site Water & Wastewater Program has reviewed the following cases and has these
comments:
S-10415-2 Lake Center Subdivision (Time Extension).
No objections.
S — 107691-2 L Street Slide Replat Phase 2.
No objections.
S-10764 Villages View Estates (with variances).
No information to support this request has been submitted. Prior to addressing this
request all soils, water and topographical information required by AMC Titles 15 and
21 shall be submitted for review.
S-10768 Alpine Meadows North (with ROW vacation).
No objections.
S-10783 Smith Subdivision #1.
No objections.
S-10784 An Ordinance amending Title 21.
No objections.
S-10785 highland Subdivision.
No objections.
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2001-085
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF A 19.3 ACRE TRACT, TRACT 1B
VILLAGES VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION, INTO FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND
ONE TRACT WITH VARIANCES FROM AMC 21.80.300.G (LENGTH OF FLAGPOLE
PORTION OF FLAG LOT) AND AMC 21.80.330 (LOT FRONTAGE ONTO A PUBLICLY
DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY), FOR PROPOSED VILLAGES VIEW EAST
SUBDIVISION, LOTS 1-4 AND TRACT A, GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF
VILLAGES SCENIC PARKWAY AND SOUTHWEST OF POTTER VALLEY ROAD.
(Case S-10764, Tax ID No. 020-311-38)
WHEREAS, a petition has been received from Kin and Son Shaw, petitioners,
and Lantech, Inc., representative, requesting approval of a subdivision of a 19.3 -
acre tract, Tract 1B, Villages View Estates Subdivision, into four (4) single-family
lots and one (1) tract with variances from AMC 21.80.300.G (length of flagpole
portion of flag lot) and AMC 21.80.330 Uot frontage onto a publicly dedicated right-
of-way), for proposed Villages View East Subdivision, Lots 1-4 and Tract A, generally
located east of Villages Scenic Parkway and southwest of Potter Valley Road; and
WHEREAS, notices were published, posted and public hearing notices were
mailed and a public hearing was held on September 17, 2001.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Municipal Planning and Zoning
Commission that:
A. The Commission makes the following findings of fact:
1. This 19.3 -acre preliminary plat proposes to subdivide Tract 1B, Villages
View Estates Subdivision into four (4) single-family lots and one (1)
tract. The lots range in size from 3.4 to 4.6 acres. The 4.3 -acre tract is
proposed for future development. The plat application includes the
following two variance requests:
a. From AMC 21.80.300.G to exceed the maximum 200 -foot length
of the flag pole portion of a lot. This variance request applies to
proposed Lot 2, which has a flag pole that is 359 feet in length.
b. From AMC 21.80.330 to allow Tract A to be platted that does not
have frontage on a publicly dedicated street.
2. The property is located south of Potter Valley Road on the eastern side
of Villages Scenic Parkway. The average lot size is 3.75 acres yielding a
density of 0.26 dwelling units per acre (DUA). The lots are to be served
with on-site water and wastewater utilities. Access to the site will be
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution 2001-085
Page 2
from Villages Scenic Parkway. A 50 -foot access easement extends from
the terminus of the platted right-of-way to the southwest boundary of
'tract A. An internal access is provided by a 20 -foot wide access
easement that extends north from Villages Scenic Parkway across
proposed Lots 3 and 4 to the south boundary of Lot 2.
3. This preliminary plat is submitted in conjunction with two other
applications. One is a request to amend the Potter Creek Master Plan
and a final site plan review as required by AO 84-21(aa). The other is a
request to amend the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan (HWMP) for
proposed Lots 1-4, Villages View Estates Subdivision. The amendment
involves removing the western t15 acres of existing Tract 113 from the
Public Sewerage Area identified on Map 9 of the HWMP and to allow a
residential density less than the minimum 3 DUA recommended in the
HWMP. The petitioners representative has agreed to remove Proposed
Tract A from the request to amend the HWMP.
4. The Commission finds that the variance for pole length is driven by
topography and the need to provide legal access.
5. The Commission finds that, in regards to the variance for property to
abut a publicly dedicated right-of-way as applies to Tract A, the plat, as
proposed, provided a public access easement for Tract A and Staffs
conditions on the plat included a limitation that no development occur
on Tract A until legal and physical access were resolved.
6. The Commission noted the concerns expressed in testimony dealt with
contamination of down grade wells, and find that, with the conditions
as proposed, these issues would be addressed.
7. The Commission finds that the petitioner will need to prove to the
professional engineers with the Municipality that this development will
create little or no impact on subdivisions down gradient. The
Commission further finds that the general consensus was that a density
of four lots was preferable to the eight lots originally proposed, albeit
not as preferred as two. As the petitioner had indicated he wished to do
the right thing and that these four lots would be the extent of the
development. Further development of these four lots had been
precluded by a plat note. The Commission explained that, if there is a
wish to change that, another public hearing would be required to
remove the plat note.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution 2001-085
Page 3
8. The Commission approved amendments to the recommended conditions
of approval to remove public hearing requirements for the final plat, to
allow the Planning Department to determine final plat requirements and
to set a time frame to revegetate the site. The Commission also added
a condition of approval recommended by Staff to resolve public access
with Chugach State Parks.
B. The Commission recommends the above captioned subdivision with variances
be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. The recommendation for approval of the four -lot preliminary plat is
provisional pending subsequent testing to determine the carrying
capacity of the land and a determination by OSWWS on the number of
lots that can be created given the geophysical limitations of this site.
After this evaluation has been made, a final plat needs to be submitted
for review and approval by the Planning Department.
2. This preliminary recommendation of approval should not be construed
to imply that a final plat for a four -lot subdivision will be approved if a
determination is made that the property cannot support the proposed
development without adversely impacting water availability and/or
nitrate levels of adjacent wells or that adequate septic sites cannot not
be located on the property.
3. Resolving the following with On -Site Water and Wastewater Services:
a. For each lot in this proposed subdivision, three wastewater
disposal system sites shall be identified on the final plat per AMC
15.65.180.B.2. The areas to be used for wastewater disposal
systems must be designated on the plat as being unavailable for
use for driveways, parking areas or structures. It is possible that
lot lines will have to be moved to accomplish this.
b. An aquifer test shall be conducted within the proposed
subdivision. This aquifer test shall include one pumping well and
a minimum of two observation wells. The test procedures shall
follow those proposed by Terrasat, Inc. in their report entitled
"Ground Water Evaluation for the proposed Villages View Estates
West" dated June 20, 2001. This aquifer test shall show that
there is an adequate water supply to support the proposed
subdivision and the effects of the appropriation of water to serve
this subdivision on adjoining properties.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution 2001-085
Page 4
C. To develop this property, only wastewater disposal systems that
have been approved as nitrogen reducing systems by the MOA
shall be installed. A note to this effect shall be placed on the final
plat. These systems will be required by code to undergo yearly
maintenance and approval.
4. Resolving the need to reduce the number of lots and/or reconfigure the
lots with OSWWS based on aquifer testing and an evaluation of nitrate
levels.
5. Surveying and identifying all drainage in the subdivision, both surface
and subsurface drainage zones to assess any impacts to driveway and
road stability and downstream properties and septic locations.
6. Submitting a restoration plan with a cost estimate of revegetating the
portions of the site that are disturbed which will not be developed under
a site plan approval, as well as estimates of revegetation of the site if the
proposed development falls to occur along with a satisfactory bond to
ensure revegetation of the site to the Planning Department, by no later
than September 30, 2002.
7. Placing a note on the plat to limit the clearing of vegetation, to require
the restoration of disturbed areas and to restrict the clearing of land
and construction to a timeframe of May 1 through September 30.
8. Placing a note on the plat specifying the type, installation and required
maintenance of on-site septic system(s) that is approved by OSWWS for
development of this property.
9. Placing a note on the plat that Tract A will not be developed until legal
ad physical access to the site has been provided.
10. Submitting wind data to Building Safety for a determination of design
and construction required by the Uniform Building Code for structures
to be constructed on this property and place a note on the plat to
specify any design and construction requirements.
11. Resolving the following with Public Works:
a. Submitting a site grading and drainage plan for the development
must be submitted to Public Works for approval.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution 2001-085
Page 5
b. Submitting an erosion and sediment control plan to Public Works
for approval.
C. The need for drainage easements and drainage improvements
with PM&E.
d. Submitting a stormwater treatment plan and obtaining an NPDES
permit.
12. Submitting an access agreement on Municipal form in accordance with
AMC 21.45.040 to Land Use Enforcement, if Lots 2 and 3 utilize the
access easement shown on the site plat.
13. Making the following drafting changes:
a. On the vicinity map. text "New Seward Hwy" should be just
"Seward Hwy".
b. On the map, the tract south of Tract A is Tract B of Villages View
Tracts subdivision.
C. Tract 20 in the SW corner is in "The Villages" subdivision.
d. Tract A -IE is in "Villages View Estates" — the "s" is missing on
Villages.
14. Submitting a final plat for review upon resolution of the above noted
conditions and prior to the issuance of any excavation, grading, fill or
building permit.
15. Resolving with Chugach State Parks, the need for a public access
easement from the north boundary of the property to the southeast
corner of the property.
16. Resolving utility easements.
17. Resolving the following with Project Management and Engineering and
Building Safety:
a. Submission of a site grading and drainage plan for approval, and
the need for drainage easements.
b. Submission of an erosion and sediment control plan for approval.
71A
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution 2001-085
Page 6
C. Submission of a final site grading and drainage plan with
appropriate horizontal and vertical elevations for the development
to Public Works for approval, with approved copies to be filed with
Building Safety and the Planning Department.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the Anchorage Planning and Zoning Commission
this 17 day of September 2001.
Daphne Brown
Chair
�.,��.. -..,764, Tax ID No. 020-311-38)
TERRASAT, INC.
1413 W. 31" Avenue
ANCHORAGE, AK 99503
T-� Goss
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE:
ATTN:
RE:
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
❑ Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover via
(907) 344-9370
FAX: 344-1490
❑ Discs Report ❑ Letter ❑ Samples ❑ Prints ❑ Photos ❑Other
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
,KForreview/comment ❑ _ f ase_. r`e-eti,--w h -5,0-P
COPY TO:
SIGNED:
L:Vbnns\oMcc\translct.doc
HM&Kmtr
ff1m,
I mr-
A
�:�:
R���;i
" I 7
Il
--- U_lcLbe }s
���ie� �101 Q.5 c.� l C?�r ► C� _, 5 l r� �. ct� rQ -- -
I'
- ---.-----5��"'�---555=�em___Pla--�-ec�---✓... _... __ ___ _
TOPICS
Proposed Villages View Estates West Subdivision
January 11, 2002
1. Nitrates
Nitrate reducing wastewater disposal systems.
Currently one approved system discharges effluent with avg. nitrates < 10 mg/l.
Second system will receive approval w/in six months with avg. nitrates < 20 mg/l.
Average septic effluent has nitrate levels of 80 —100 mg/l.
Well Construction.
All water wells within the proposed subdivision shall be cased into the bedrock.
The casing shall be adequately grouted at the sediment/bedrock boundary to provide a
barrier that minimizes the potential for infiltration into the well. Existing wells do.
A grout seal shall extend a minimum of 20 feet into the bedrock.
Lot Size
Average lot size in the subdivision will be over 3.75 acres each.
2. Water Availability.
Average well yield within %: mile of proposed subdivision is 3.91 gpm.
Geological and hydrogeological evaluation suggests yields comparable.
Municipal minimum for a four-bedroom home is 0.42 gpm. 5 BR = 0.52 gpm.
Possible fault 0.4 mi. east of proposed subdivision.
Strongest control on bedrock aquifers is fractures and faults.
Local topographic features have little affect on regional groundwater flow.
Conclude that a significant portion of the groundwater that flows beneath the Potter
Creek drainage basin comes from sources east of the valley higher in the Chugach
Range.
Static water levels strongly indicate no hydraulic connection with existing wells.
Data shows lots could support homes with up to 9 bedrooms, so actually could
develop subdivision with twice as many lots (but ww disposal will not allow.)
J
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution 2001-085
Page 3
8. The Commission approved amendments to the recommended conditions
of approval to remove public hearing requirements for the final plat, to
allow the Planning Department to determine final plat requirements and
to set a time frame to revegetate the site. The Commission also added
a condition of approval recommended by Staff to resolve public access
with Chugach State Parks.
B. The Commission recommends the above captioned subdivision with variances
be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. The recommendation for approval of the four -lot preliminary plat is
provisional pending subsequent testing to determine the carrying
capacity of the land and a determination by OSWWS on the number of
lots that can be created given the geophysical limitations of this site.
After this evaluation has been made, a final plat needs to be submitted
for review and approval by the Planning Department.
2. This preliminary recommendation of approval should not be construed
to imply that a final plat for a four -lot subdivision will be approved if a
determination is made that the property cannot support the proposed
development without adversely impacting water availability and/or
nitrate levels of adjacent wells or that adequate septic sites cannot not
be located on the property.
.J.w, Gr»i
3. Resolving the following with On -Site Water and Wastewater Services:
a. For each lot in this proposed subdivision, three wastewater
disposal system sites shall be identified on the final plat per AMC
15.65.180.B.2. The areas to be used for wastewater disposal
7/1,07
0 1 systems must be designated on the plat as being unavailable for
-use for driveways, parking areas or structures. It is possible that
lot lines will have to be moved to accomplish this.
� 3 g � b. An aquifer test shall be conducted within the proposed
�.`�!✓l subdivision. This aquifer test shall include one pumping well and
a minimum of two observation wells. The test procedures shall
follow those proposed by Terrasat, Inc. in their report entitled
"Ground Water Evaluation for the proposed Villages View Estates
West" dated June 20, 2001. This aquifer test shall show that
there is an adequate water supply to support the proposed
subdivision and the effects of the appropriation of water to serve
this subdivision on adjoining properties.
-r._U V1 (Lyb
June 26, 2001
Municipality of Anchorage
Building Safety Division
On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
4700 S. Bragaw Street
Anchorage, AK 99507
Attention: Jim Cross, P.E.
Subject: Villages View West Subdivision
Septic System Feasibility Study
Dear Jim:
The owner of the property near the end of The Villages Scenic Parkway intends to
subdivide the property into 4 lots. Each lot will be in excess of 3.25 Acres in surface
area. A subsurface exploration study was completed on the property in two phases to
determine soil conditions and to find satisfactory areas for onsite septic systems. The
first study was completed in August of 1998 when 12 test holes were placed at the
lower elevations of the property. A second exploration was completed in May of 2001 to
study soils at higher elevations on the property.
All test holes revealed bedrock at varying depths. In most cases, however, a minimum
of 2' of unsaturated percable soil was found above the bedrock layer. Standard septic
s,!stems will not bo appropriate for this area and we are reconm,•:nding the use of
bottomless sand filters to treat septic effluent generated by households developed on
these lots. An additional advantage of the sand filter system is the size of the
absorption bed, which is usually less than half the size of a standard absorption bed.
Three sites, which meet all the requirements of the Municipal Ordinance governing
septic systems, are required for each lot. Our study indicates these locations are
available.
Soils encountered in the holes revealed an organic layer at the surface, which varied in
depth from .5' to 2.5'. In every case the organics were underlain by loose sands or
loose sands and gravels with some silt. The percolation rate of these materials was
generally less than 1 minute per inch, but in areas with more silt slowed to 3 minutes
per inch. These soils are normally very good for the treatment of septic effluent. The
primary problem, however, appears to be the presence of bedrock. The use of the
nitrate reducing systems on the lots with shallow bedrock will provide additional
treatment to effluent before it enters the absorptive soil strata.
Villages View West Subdivision
June 26, 2001
Page 2
The surface of the property slopes primarily from east to west with some cross slopes
from north to south. The slope from east to west in some cases exceeds 25%.
Systems will be located to maintain the required 50' separation from the 25% slopes in
conformance with Municipal regulations. Some slope flattening may be required which
can be accomplished during the development of the lots.
Further investigation regarding the actual slopes of the property in the area of the
proposed septic systems may be required before the final locations can be established.
It is our opinion, however, based on the results achieved from the subsurface soils
investigation that septic systems can be successfully placed on this property. In every
case, a sand filter system will be required due to the proximity of bedrock and the
limited area available meeting the slope setback requirements.
Enclosed are results from the test holes placed on the property. Please review the
attached information and advise if you have further questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Michael E. Anderson, P.E.
Attachments
TRACE B-1 ' •: j .. /, i TRACT A 4 �i /
___
TH2T� G1. o r.. �78A4�0yQ •� i`��
1 iJ •:: 1 \ (T_ H28
1.37 ove r •� C l �4, i/ I �`\
ir,
Cl
e.
TR
, l
18_
. �, � `�\ `� '•� � o `. 111 \� �� .
4.39
11
:(0"
0 VO
TR 20 m 40
� Oo
qy� 1 (9020 \ \ \ .•
\\11780go00
TEST HOLE LOCATION PLAN
SCALE 1" = 200'
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
���•OF A�gs�a9d
N -
w : MICHAEL F. ANDERSON
CE -4381
�DR-Or[SS
Performed For: Kin Shaw Date Performed:
Legal Description: Lot 2. Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN
ti^
1 — PT/OL
GP
Bedrock
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered? No
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
11 Date: 5/17101
1
1
1
1
1
1
See Site Plan
Perc. Rate: >t MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter: 6"
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael E. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6/25/01
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
�soaal4t.�
�F OF A t 4
491-11
�m + MICHAEL E. ANDERSON•��
CE .4381 ; a
,,F<<I�PROFESSO oe�o..
Performed For: Kin Shaw Date Performed: 577'10t
Legal Description: Lot 2. Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN
PT/OL
GP
Bedrock
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered? No
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
11 Date: 5/17/01
See Site Plan
To
Perc. Rate: >1 MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter: 6"
Test Run Between 5 Ft. and 6 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael E. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6125101
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health 8 Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
497
-.MICHAEL E. ANDERSON
��••.
CE -4381 .' a
r
`1 O F E SSoov�� o`
Performed For: Kin Shaw Date Performed: 5t1%�f
Legal Description: Lot 2. Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN
1 PTIOL
2 _~
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
kLl
GM
TESTHOLE NO, 27
Some Silt
Bedrock
Was Groundwater
Encountered? No
If Yes, What Depth?
Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
Date: 5/17/01
See Site Plan
To
Perc. Rate: >1 Min./Inch Perc. Hole Diameter: 6"
Test Run Between 5 Ft. and 6 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
p
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael E. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6/25/01
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
o�p��CCwt1
OF AC 14C
+/
4911! f '- v
MICHAEL E. ANDERSON M
CE -4381
Performed For: Kin Shaw Date Performed: 101
Legal Description: Lot 2. Villages View West Subdivision
11 —I PT/OL
3I I GP/SP
4W Bedrock
5
5
61 1
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered? No
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
11 Date: 5/17/01
1
1
1
1
1
1
See Site Plan
Perc. Rate: >1 MinJlnch Perc. Hole Diameter: 6"
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael E. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6/25/01
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health 8, Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
49
P`.I�f.Gl4��..• Lyt�fL..
0 .? .MICHAR E. ANDEMN•.;ti�
f CE - 4381
�P
Performed For: Kin Shaw Date Performed: 5/01
Legal Description: Lot 2. Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN
1 .�► PT/OL
2
GP/GM
3
4
5
6� Bedrock
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
See Site Plan
Perc. Rate: >1 MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter: 6"
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael E. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6125101
Was Groundwater
9
Encountered? Yes
If Yes, What Depth? 5•
10
Depth to Water
After Monitoring 5.
11
Date: 5/17101
1
1
1
1
1
1
See Site Plan
Perc. Rate: >1 MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter: 6"
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael E. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6125101
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
Performed For: Kin Shaw Date Performed: 5/7/01
Legal Description: Lot 3. Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN
1 PT/OL
2
4
GP/SP
Bedrock
Was Groundwater
9
Encountered? S
If Yes, What Depth? L
10
Depth to Water O
After Monitoring None P
11
Date: 5/17/01 E
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
See Site Plan
Perc. Rate: >1 MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter: 6"
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Fl.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael F. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6125101
s Q��•Or •A4 444
S
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650 0 MICHAEL E. ANDERSON
SOILS LOG- PERCOLATION TEST 0� s CE -4331
•• V
N
Performed For: Kin Shaw Date Performed: it ��`a77Y"`4�•
Legal Description: Lot 3. Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN
2I —_ I PT/OL
t
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ce
GM
Bedrock
See Site Plan
Was Groundwater
Encountered?
If Yes, What Depth?
Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
Date: 5/17/01
Perc. Rate: >1 Min./Inch Perc. Hole Diameter: 6"
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael F. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6/25/01
NG.NEERS SEAL)
!� • ' Muni ipalitY of Mehorage
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3 HUMAN SERVICES f • i !r^ TN'' a +i
825 `L' Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST :.
PERFORMED FOR: John Beraaren DATE PERFORID�*h'8I.ZJ9S`���• ~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Villages Sub. Township. Range. Sectiorr
TESTHOLE NO. 1
QCT 6EBQ.00tr...
7-
9-
12-
13-
14-
Is-
is-
17-
is-
19 -
20 9121314 151617181920
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED?
IF YEA AT WHAT
DEPTH?
No
"? IJone am 8/10/9E
PERCOLATION RATE (rtununvmcn) PERC MOLE DIAMETER 15to
TEST RUN BETWEEN 2 L FTAND r_=.FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEDBY: M• Anderson E FY THAT MIS TES WAS PERFORMED
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE - S plp? 6
72-= (Rev. 485)
r �
[! r
2-,
3
o �
4-
.�
r7 6
TESTHOLE NO. 1
QCT 6EBQ.00tr...
7-
9-
12-
13-
14-
Is-
is-
17-
is-
19 -
20 9121314 151617181920
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED?
IF YEA AT WHAT
DEPTH?
No
"? IJone am 8/10/9E
PERCOLATION RATE (rtununvmcn) PERC MOLE DIAMETER 15to
TEST RUN BETWEEN 2 L FTAND r_=.FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEDBY: M• Anderson E FY THAT MIS TES WAS PERFORMED
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE - S plp? 6
72-= (Rev. 485)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH d HUMAN SERVICES
825 `V Street, Anchorage, Alaska 94502-0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
.. \.1.Vla\ •
ENGINEERS SEAL) t
'LATH '
PERFORMED FOR: John Beragren DATE PERFORMED: A'� %2'%98
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Villages Sub. Township, Range. Section:
4
10
11
12
13
14
1b
16
17
18
14
20
WAS GROUND WATER
°fir
OL
•n•a
1
2
s
IF YES. AT WHAT
.
.. .
GM
;,.
3
TESTHOLE NO. 2
4-
mg? None
tt+t 8/10 98
5. b
L
8
,J�D20GL
�%
4
10
11
12
13
14
1b
16
17
18
14
20
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED?
No
s
IF YES. AT WHAT
L
0
DEPTH?
P
E
�
mg? None
tt+t 8/10 98
uPERCOLATION RATE tmmuawuiCfl PERC HOLE DIAMETER 8
TEST RUN BETWEEN Z VL FT AND 3 IL FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEDBY: 1.1_ Andersen I /�h•Lct!-0 """•^a" TIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDEUNES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE. OATS .-
72-0Cd (R�v, a,ESI
Munk*mltY of Anchorage
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3 HUMAN SERVICES
825'V Street Anchorage. Alaska 99502.0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR:. John Beragren DATE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Villages Sub. Township. Rance. Secfiorr
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
OL
TESTHOLE NO. 3 _
61w
SLOPE
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? NO
5
IF YES. AT WHAT L
DEPTH? 0
P
E
Ione �t 8/10/98
(ENQWLcjrSSEAL)
=�.CFpl,��1�)
RwEn x•8/2%98
ri
u PERCOLATION RATE 1 (mmuteyuren) PEAC HOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN ZVZ' FT AND 3 1/t- FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMED BY: M- Anderson iW4 Q t.Lcr...[
1 - k e - ptl'IITiFY THAaTTIS WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE: ��/ Y Pr
72-008 (R�v. 4/65)
l "GINEER•SSEAL)
MunkipaBty of Anchorage
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES ` 99502�
825 'L' Street, Anchorage. Alaska -0650 . • 1. .......... .
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST ='
• •/,iii. r ... ;...,
PERFORMED FOR.
John 13eraaren ITh'" •
DATE PERFORMED? • C/8r /'Z.i98
The Villa
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:hVillages Sub. Township, Range. Segorc
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
OL
TESTHOLE NO. 4
GW
Gr'� R V C+L
a
WAS GROUND WATER No
—
IF
IF YES, AT WHAT
DEPTH?
D"mmww[ one am 8/10/91
u $..
PERCOLATIONRATE
lmu,u�wu+�a+)�PEAL HOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN 4p/L- FT AND ..54- FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PEAFORMEDBY: 1't- Anderson (-W:• LI—Ldr-� IFYTHAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES W EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE:
72-00e (Rev 4/65)
0-
u $..
PERCOLATIONRATE
lmu,u�wu+�a+)�PEAL HOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN 4p/L- FT AND ..54- FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PEAFORMEDBY: 1't- Anderson (-W:• LI—Ldr-� IFYTHAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES W EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE:
72-00e (Rev 4/65)
w of Andwrage
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3 HUMAN SERVICES4 . .. ) •
825 'L' Street Anchorage. Alaska 99502-06.50
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
r !
PERFORMED FOR: John Beraaren f+FAc,' • I ^• '�_',.�_-=-�
DATE PERFORM
The Villa
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:_ Villages Sub. Towrohip. Range. Section: .
De=H O L SLOPE SITE PLAN
1
1 e
O • r.
2
d .p
u
•a
3
p
4
•o i o
7
TESTHOLE NO. 5
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
R
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED?
IF YES. AT WHAT
DEPTH?
No
S
L
0
P
E
BMW mw? None 8/10 9
Yvmrmp? Q+t L8
uN
PERColAT10N RATE (mu+uuvuun) PERC HOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN I VZ- F7 AND Z IL FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORLIEDer. M. Anderson 1!I"F••c.Gvc...CSE—LTIFYTHAT THISTEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE:
72-= JA" NASI .
GINE SEAL)
• wturadvauty o(Androrape o�S�G<;
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH d HUMAN SERVICES
825 'L' Street. Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650
i 4� _ �
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST r�"""
PERFORMED FOR: John aeraarenDATE
Net
Time
Deem to
Water
Na
Drop
-A-/ 18 9 /:1f5
PERFORIaEq!P/18'-2/•98\,>
211
—
/: SS
I /o
1577t"
I
/� L
z�fs'•
1 LsoL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION. The Villages Sub.
Township.
Range.
2 7
Seaton:
•
�L
SLOPE
SITE PLAN
I
1
N
Z
o
TESTHOLE NO. 6
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
Sete
i
14n
I
I.
4
�'
_
I
I
I
.a
5�
'
I
i
I
6- ,Q .
•I
7
$
��;
6�e.nu� •
i
I
I
I
10
11
12
13
14
1s
16
17
18
19
i
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED?
IF YES. AT WHAT
DEPTH?
No
S
L
0
P
E
Oema ?jtone 8/10 98
YwimrmpT Qele _�
20�3 8
PERCOLATION RATE (mmuleva+enl PEAL HOLE DIAMETER
I
TEST RUN BETWEEN Z Z FT AND 3 I L FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
Reeding Om Gros
Time
Net
Time
Deem to
Water
Na
Drop
-A-/ 18 9 /:1f5
—
211
—
/: SS
I /o
1577t"
I
/� L
z�fs'•
1 LsoL
I /o
I I
3 e L
2 7
e 1.�
1/2.41
•I
PERFORMEDBY•. M. Anderson I 119140�EA-10ERRIFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE--*. 8 A/
72-008 (Rev. UES)
Mtmieip of Ane LIMA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8 HUMAN SERVICES
M OL: Street. Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Berggren ' DATE PERFORM �%!'%fi �•�r•9 $�w,�` .�
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Villages Sub. Township. Range, Section:
1
2
3
4
6
7 ••
8 �•
10
11
12-
13-1
14
15
16
17
18
19
O L_
S v✓
TESTHOLE NO. 7
.
SLOPE
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
IF YES. AT WHAT
DEPTH?
�
;,y?gone Deft 8/10/9f
Andhq
DeA Gr Not
Tuna Tun.
Depth to
Weer
Nat
Drop
a6/
1G Z 3:05 —
3 W1.
'-
3:10
5PAy"
p
IIfT
3: / I
III,y
g
1
+
T:1
'M w
itG
r2z S
gr ••
Zr 2_"
20 $Ad
U
PERCOLATION RATE tmmutwmrnl PEAC MOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN Z"/Z- FT AND 3 tlt. FT .
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEDEr. M. Anderson 1 Yv d,--QL C..tGt--LwrrIFl.THAI THIS TES WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES W EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE
72-= JA". 4l65)
Munkipo ft of Acv.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
82S •L• Street, Anchorage• Alaska 99SM-MM
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
• PERFORMED FOR: John Beraaren DATE
LEGAL DEscRtrrtoN, The Villages Sub. Township• Ran
12
13
14
• 15
76
17
18
19
.20
TESTHOLE NO. 8
so
$�DfLOctL
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
IF YES, AT WHAT
DEPTH)
Secborr
*o„Akr
q?None be 8/10 91
wj i
l
�.. l.ilmn't•f Ja n;.�Ct�
A..dlry I D�Gm lr n I Tow
Dwm To
WWmw I
p, e
tom! 18 z 3: v I
I ?Yr. •
I 13:Y5 I S
�� 1
Zit.•
1 d:SD I
-1yl,
y
I I
I I I
I J • I
L. ..
(
I I
I 1 I
1
1
1
• 1
1
u84
PEACOLA710N RATE Z 1mrunww=1 PEAL HOL DIAMETER
TESTRUNBEIWEEH 3 F; AND 3 VL FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMED BY. M• Anderson ( IFY THA THIS TEST W
WAS PERFORMED
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL SATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFE= ON THS DATE DATE: •— S I
72-0Cb (Rev.
�TENGINF-Zn ScALI,
UuniciPft of r��,• ..:
e
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3 HUMAN SERVICES fr JjH f /
825 'L' Street, Anchorage. Alaska 99502-0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST °
' v
PERFORMED FOR: Joon Beraaren DATE PERFORMjjD' � l',Z.'f.9$=`•P���-r
I.ECAt DEscRlrrTON: The Villages Sub. Township, Range, Section: .
1
2-
3-
6. 3
6
141 1
OL
TESTHOLE NO. 9
SW
6c1;noc.t'.. ..
SLOPE
S
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
IF YEL AT WHAT
DEPTH?
�None 9+t 8110191
C. G.
DomIT IT. m
Vftt
I
Yr I
S J/-0 • 1
Z
is 1
I I ai:zt
I— I S' 4 1
I yI u
1
1 I
1 I I
• 1
I 1 1
I 1 �
20 -{ ' �.
UPERCOLATION RATE (nWVA@WV f)PERCHOLEDIAMETER 8
TEST RCM BETWEEN Vh. FT AND 3 LFT .
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to'Test.
PERFORMED eY: _1.1_. Anile-epn IM --4 ,(.Gt!:: 4----CERTIFYTMATTH TFS WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCEL' SMUNICIPALG=EW WiTM AATE AND UNES EFFE:.: ON THM GATE. DATE: _ S�I/ 16
72-= (A".
>}MUniaOaUly of Anehotape
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH d HUMAN SERVICES
825 01.7 Street Anchorage• Masks 99502- 6
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
-7ENGINEE(S SEAL)
�`�I1,IJIy LE•�
e
1�• A011[ -.
PERFORMED FOR: John Beroaren DATE PERFDRMEI}'Y��B`iZ.yE9 $•��`�+.'�
LEGAL DBEs-c-RIPnON: The Villages Sub. Township, Range. Secdom .
SLOPE SITE PLAN
SM1 TESTHOLE NO. 10
6 >�1/h� grLTjTi o[ 1�
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1s
16
17
18
19
20
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
IF YES, AT WHAT
DEPnR
PM a Um VANNrW Noone bw 8/10191
s�L
Req I Ors (T mNot
I 1 I 1
I I 1 1
I I I I
I 1 1 I I
I I I I I
I 1 I
1 I
I 1
I 1
I-, 1 $4
u �� ��1mm) PERC MOL DW.IETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN 2 YL FT AND 3 L FT .
coMMENTs Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to'Test.
PERFORMED 67: M- Anderson ) 7V%-c�.,tAi�. Z. �-` CE3iTIFY , /7HIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNIMPAL GUIDELINES eY EFFEC: ON THIS DATE. DATE;
?2.008 (R�v. ve5)
.t
o Munk*ft of Andwrae.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH d HUMAN SERVICES
825 'L' Sreel. Anchora9k Alaska 99502-DSW
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
' �Ea(6ME"R'S b I
t<:OF A
t
10 TF I
e/)tyJ . 4331.E
PERFORMED FOR: John Beracren DATE PERFOR►Y 0%"8/2/98•
LEGAL. DEscRlPnok: The Villages Sub. Township. Range. Section:
7
2
4
5 < <•
7-
12 12
13
14
Is
16
17
18
19
20
TESTHOLE NO. 11
5\A-1
Bab200-.0_ -
.
SLOPE
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
ri
IF YES. AT WHAT L
DEPTH? 0
P
E
,p tone BIt 8/90 98
srrE
P�q I Om Gros I ha Owen m Na
Tnw Tim WNW Dmo
I I
I I I
I 1 I
I 1 i I
I I I I I
I 1 I
1 1 I
I
I
u.,
PERCOLATION RATE (mnwtaymdf) PERC MOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN FT AND FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMED BY: M- Anderson 1 m,4"GLGf,..c(/j ryry THAT THIS TES WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITHAL:. SATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES W EFFECT ON TH15 DATE DATE —V>
72-E IR".4/LS{
. jEN61NQE'it5 sE�)
MuM *ft of Anchorage %.Q��
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3 HUMAN SERVICES sG7H • ~IIO
825'L' Street 02-0850
Anchorage. Alaska 995 — ..../y......
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST(--�� '
PERFORMED FOR: John BerQQren OATS PERFORM€D:!`-•8/2/98.1.•.r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Villages Sub. Township, Range, Section:
sITiPET� SITE PLAN
1
2-
3-
4-
5-
7 -
jet 3 4 5 7
irl
10-
11
0 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
TESTHOLE NO. 12
5LJ
go V Lb eLs
$a0n-0CJL_
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? NO
IF YES. AT WHAT
DEPTH?
Ito to wam ter
ram? am 8/10/9E
—
20 a N
PERCOLATION RATE 4' (mmutevincn) PERC HOLE DIAMETER
.411 TEST RUN BETWEEN 3 •I� &"" F7 AND 71 LFT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEDBY: M. Anderson 1 TIFY THAT THIS JFST
CcWAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIOEUNES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE-'.-
72-008
ATE 72-008 (Rev. 4/85)
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
P.O. Box 196650
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
A. Please fill in the information requested below. Print one letter or number per block
OFFICE USE
RECD BY:
1. Vacation Code 2. Tax Identification No. 3. Street Address
F1 10121131/l/1561 13 1 ti 4 1 L—W1161L- 5Lc r1 L K
4. NEW abbreviated legal description ('T12N R2W SEC 2 LOT 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOTS 34).
S. EXISTING abbreviated legal description (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOT 45 OR SHORT SUB ELK 3 LOTS 34) full legal on back page.
6. Petitioner's Name (Last - FiTt)
CityQNGNB1146e? State AX
Phone # i15-941-7 Zip
7. Petitioner's Representative
miss
Address Vivo W. AIoiv IVa ,;r-IB3
Clty1fv,:W01'J 6L State ' 41�
Phone # ��2� 52Zip O 3
8. Petition Area Acreage S. Proposed 10. Existing 11. Grid Number 12. Zone
Number Lots Number Lots
HIM I
■■■■■■■ ■■■ ■■■E 1111■■ ■■■■■■
13. Fee $ 14. Community Council
B. I hereby certify that (I am) (1 have been authorized to act for) the owner of the property described above and that I desire to subdivide it In
conformance with Chapter 21 of the Anchorage Municipal Code of Ordinances. I understand that payment of the basic subdivision fee Is
nonrefundable and is to coverthe costs associated with processing this application, that it does not assure approval of the subdivision. I also
understand that additional fees may be assessed if the Municipality's costs to process this application exceed the basic fee. 1 further
understand that assigned hearing dates are tentative and may have to be postponed by Planning Staff, Platting Board, Planning Commission,
or the Assembly due to administrative reasons.
Date: Z/�/2�O1 �, /
Signature
*Agents must provide written
3DWi Fml Mw w�
of authorization.
C. Please check or fill in the following:
1. Comprehensive Plan —Land Use Classification
_ Residential
Commercial
Parks/Open Space
Transportation Related
2. Comprehensive Plan — Land Use Intensity
Special Study
3. Environmental Factors (if any):
a. Wetland
1. Developable
2. Conservation
3. Preservation
Marginal Land
Commercial/Industrial
Public Lands/Institutions
Dwelling Units per Acre L 10
Alpine/Slope Affected
Alpine/Slope Affected
Industrial
Special Study
b. Avalanche
c. Floodplain
d. Seismic Zone (Harding/Lawson)
D. Please indicate below If any of these events have occurred in the last five years on the property
!� Re¢eFling �/>� PL4� Case Number
UY Subdivision I Case Number
I Conditional Use Case Number
Zoning Variance
Enforcement Action For
Building /Land Use Permit For,
Army Corp of Engineers Permit
E. Legal description for advertising.
F. Checklist
Case Number
40 Copies of Plat (Long Plat)
30 Copies of Plat (Short Plat)
_ Reduced Copy of Plat (81Ax 11)
Certificate to Plat
Aerial Photo
LHousing Stock Map
Zoning Map
(a' Water. A Private Wells
L Sewer. Y Private Septic
Fee
Drainage Plan
LAY Topo Map 4 Copies
Soils Report 4 Copies
Pedestrian Walkways
Landscaping Requirements
Community Well
Community Sys.
Waiver
Public Utility
Public Utility
lo
Municipality of Anchorage
PLATTING BOARD AUTHORITY
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
Applicant: Kin Y. Shaw and Son C. Shaw
Address: P.O. Box 110637 Anchorage, Ak
Phone Number. 345-9617
Legal Description of property involved. Tract 1 B. Villages View Estates.
Present/future Use of Property: Vacant/ Residential
Tax Identification Number. 02031138
This is a request for a variance from Section 21.80.330 of the Land Subdivision Regulations.
This variance is for. Tract A of not fronting on a publically dedicated street.
A: The existing situation is: Vacant land.
B. The granting of this petition would permit. Tract A to have acess from the existing 50 foot
access easement.
Before a variance maybe granted, the applicant must prove that each of the following four conditions have been
fulfilled. Answer each of the conditions in detail, using additional sheets if necessary.
The undersigned alleges that:
That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting said property that the strict
application of the provisions of this ordinance would clearty be impractical, unreasonable, or
undesirable to the general public. These special circumstances are: Tract A is not a
developable parcel of land at this time. The existinq 50' access easement will suffice as
reasonable access until the unknown development to the east occurs.
2. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property in the area in which said property is situated for the following
reasons: There is no negative affect on the public welfare.
3. That such variance will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this ordinance
or the Comprehensive Plan of the Municipality for the following reasons: The Comp plan expects
and encourages subdivisons to be designed with many issues considered, and provides the
flexibility for intelligent design decisions. This variance will facilitate the creation of these large lots
that will blend in with the neighborhood.
4. The above listed special conditions or circumstances do not result from the action of the
applicant and such conditions or circumstances do not merely constitute a pecuniary (monetary)
hardship or inconvenience in that: The existing topo is dictating the need for this variance.
SignaT ture ofAuth nzo ed Agent
Address: 440 W. Benson Blvd. Suite 103, Anch, Ak
:/ tom C'O^ I�S�f `7!✓f
Signature of Land Owner
Address: 6600 Wes Way, Anchorage, Ak
'eWe"
y?°r
Municipality of Anchorage
�f1W!
PLATTING BOARD AUTHORITY
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
Applicant: Kin Y. Shaw and Son C. Shaw
Address: P.O. Box 110637 Anchorage Ak
Phone Number. • 345-9617
Legal Description of property involved: Tract 1 B. Villages View Estates
Present/future Use of Property: Vacant/ Residential
Tax identification Number. 02031138
This is a request for a variance from Section 21.80.300.G of the Land Subdivision Regulations
This variance Is for. Flagpole portion of lot longer than 200 feet
A: The existing situation is: Vacant land.
B. The granting of this petition would permitThe tlaaoole portion of Lot 2 to be 359 feet lona
Before a variance may be granted, the applicant must prove that each of the following four conditions have been
fulfilled. Answer each of the conditions in detail, using additional sheets if necessary.
The undersigned alleges that.-
That
hat.
That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting said property that the strict
application of the provisions of this ordinance would clearly be impractical, unreasonable, or
undesirable to the general public. These special circumstances are: This is a unique parcel of
land. Excellent building sites for homeowners on these large lots have been located and the
lot lines have been designed around these sites Physical access to Lot 2 will actually be
along the access easement crossing lot 3 & 4 The flagpole portion is only to provide legal
frontage as per Title 21.
2. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property in the area in which said property is situated for the following
reasons: The proposed design will create safer, flatter driveway grades and preserve the
building sites.
3. That such variance will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this ordinance
or the Comprehensive Plan of the Municipality for the following masons: The Como plan expects
and encourages subdivisons to be designed with safety issues being paramount The lots are
designed to minimize grades thus providing a safer environment
4. The above listed special conditions or circumstances do not result from the action of the
applicant and such conditions or circumstances do not merely constitute a pecuniary (monetary)
hardship orinconvenience in that The existing topo is dictating the design
Signature of Authorized Agent
Adores 440 W. Benson BIW. Suite 103, Anch, Ak
Signature of Land Owner
Address., 6600 Wes Way, Anchorage, Ak
Municipality of Anchorage
• Department of Community Planning and Development OFFICE USE
P.O. Box 196650 Rec'd By:
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 Verify Own:
SITE PLAN REVIEW Poster and Affidavit:
This application for a site plan review is for the following:
FINAL REOUIRED BY
1. j11 NEW 1. A.O. -21 /*Z -35L
2. _ AMENDMENT 2. P.L.I. ZONE
A. Please fill in the information requested below. Print one letter or number per block.
1. Case Number (If known) 2. Petitioning for
n N1_rvM z PIAfj
3. Abbreviated legal description (T12N R2W SEC 2 LOT 45 OR SHORT SUB BLK 3 LOT 34). Full legal on back page.
4. Petitioner's Name (Last -First) 5. Site Address
Address: 66, 8C6 I1 a E 3�7
city: �'.�cr�e2obc state: AK
Phone: .% AI'% Zip:
City: ANGHEYLA d E State: pc
Phone: 56 Z— 5 Z9% zip: q
7. Current Zoning:
r - s[
10. Hearing Date
YYMMDD
13. Fee $
8. PebttonArea Acreage
11. Principal Tax Number
101210111111
9. Grid number
12. No. Tax Parcels
14. Community Council RA BRIT Cr��IG
B. I hereby certify that (I am) (I have been authorized to act for) the owner of the property described above and that I desire
site plan review approval in conformance with Chapter 21 of the Anchorage Municipal Code of Ordinances. I understand
that payment of the site plan review fee Is nonrefundable and Is to cover the costs associated with processing this applica-
tion, that it does not assure approval of the site plan. I also understand that additional fees may be assessed If the Municipality's
costs to process this application exceed the basic fee. I further understand that assigned dates are tentative and may have
to be postponed by Planning Staff or Planning Commission due to administrative reasons.
Date: / 161Zdrr1V Signature: _� tet . ✓�
Agents must provide written proof or authorization.
20.039 (Rev. 7/94)• Page 1
C. Please check or fill in the following:
1, Comprehensive Plan - Land use Classification
QC Residential _ Marginal Land
Commercial
Commercial /Industrial
Parks/Open Space _ Public. Lands/institutions
Transportation Related
2. Comprehensive Plan - Land use Intensity
Dwelling Units per acre
3. Environmental Factors (if any):
a. Wetland
Development
2. Conservation
Alpine/Slope Affected
Industrial
Special Study
Special Study Alpine/Slope Affected
b. Avalanche
C. Floodplain
d. Seismic Zone (Harding/Larson)
T 3. Preservation
D. Please: indicate below if any of these events have occurred in the last three years on the property.
Rezoning Case Number
_!X_ Subdivision Case Number %0 X22_ / S /0;3
Conditional Use Case Number `
—d Zoning Variance Case Number 9 —17 2--
-I,` Site Plan Review Case Number
Enforcement Action For
Building/Land Use Permit For
E. At least 25 copies of the following must be submitted with the application (see AMC 21.15.030).
1. Site plans (drawn to scale) depicting: (5 C I.IAIVZAi/v
a. Building Footprints d. Lighting & Signage
b. Parking Space Layout e. Drainage/Grading
c. Traffic & Pedestrian Circulation I. Schematic or detailed Landscape Plan
2. Building Plans (drawn to scale) if required:
a. Floor Plans
b. Elevations (all sides)
c. Exterior Colors and Textures (material list)
F. The following must also be provided:
1. Vicinity map depicting proposal in relationship to surroundings.
2. Narrative description of the following: 5
a. Statement of Planning Objectives/Description of Operation
b. Development Schedule with Phases and Dates
c. Intent of Final Ownership
d. Total Occupancy
3. General site plan review standards should be addressed and any applicable public facility site refew stan-
dards or P.L.I. requirements must be addressed (see AMC 21.50.200)
4. Optional (may be required by Planning Commission or staff).
a. Holding Capacity of Land Analysis d. Economic Impact Report
b. Soils Reports e. Air Quality Impact Report
c. Traffic Impact Report I. Noise Impact Report
G. The full legal description for legal advertisement (use separate sheet If necessary).
20-039 (Rev. 7/94)• Page 2
STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
The petitioner should address the following general standards as part of the narrative. In addition, many site plan reviews
have specific requirements from zoning special limitations or adopted plans which must be addressed. (See AMC 21.50.200)
The authority hearing a site plan review application may approve the application only if It finds that the site plan:
Will not have a permanent negative impact on the Items listed below substantially greater than that anticipated from
permitted development:
1. pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and safety;
2. the demand for and availability of public services and facilities;
3. noise, air, water or other forms of environmental pollution;
4. the maintenance of compatible and efficient development patterns and land use Intensities.
20-039 (Rev. 7190' Page 3
Villages View Estates West
Master Plan/Final Site Plan
1. Overview
This is a submittal for Master Plan and Final Site Plan Approval for Villages View
Estates West.
2. Location
Legal Description: Tract 1 B, Villages View Estates , Plat 2000-130.
In general: East of Villages Scenic Parkway, and south of Viewpoint South
Subdivision.
Zoning: This area lies within the area zoned R-3SL as per A.0. 84-21.
3. Statement of Planning Objectives
To create 4 large lots and 1 Tract along Villages Scenic Parkway. These lots will
serve as buffer lots between the higher density R-3SL area to the east, and the
R-6 lots to the west of Villages Scenic Parkway.
To abide by A.0. 84-21 and it's conditions.
To involve the neighboring community in the planning process.
To involve the Municipality of Anchorage agencies and other public agencies in
the planning process.
LANTECH. INC.. SURVEYORS . PLANNERS . ENGINEERS 1
440 W. BENSON BLVD.. SUITE 103 . ANCHORAGE. AK 99503 . (907) 562-5291 . FAX 561-6626
Arm� ■■
4. Master Site Plan/Final Site Plan for
Villages View Estates West
Type of Development
Housing Type: Single Family residential.
Number of Houses: Four single family residential homes on lots 1 through 4,
and no development is planned at this time for Tract A.
Housing Styles: Not defined by developer, as per individual homeowner.
Housing Price Range: Medium to expensive.
Lot Sizes: Lots will be approximately 31/z acres.
Development Schedule: 2001 to 2003 construction season.
Intent of Final Ownership: Four private individual homesites.
Total Occupancy: Four families.
Vegetation
The site is predominantly covered with mature strands of birch trees and spruce
trees ranging from 15 feet to 60 feet tall.
Streets
Layout: The lots will front on the currently constructed Villages Scenic Parkway.
Buffers
These four lots will ultimately serve as buffer lots between the eventual
development of the parcels to the east and the R-6 lots to the west of Villages
Scenic Parkway.
LANTECH, INC.. SURVEYORS . PLANNERS . ENGINEERS 2
440 W. BENSON BLVD., SUITE 103 . ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 . (907) 562-5291 . FAX 561-6626
Greenbelts
No greenbelts are planned. With an average lot size of over 3'/2 acres,
greenbelts are not necessary.
Lighting
No lighting is proposed for Villages Scenic Parkway.
Commmunity Contacts.
As this application is processed, we are meeting with the Rabbit Creek
Community Council and other homeowner groups to address their concerns.
Open Space
Since the proposed lots are very large, (over 3 S/z acres) the need for open
space is inherently provided for. A single family house usually encompasses
less than a 3,000 square foot footprint.
Water
Public water is not available to the lots. Private water wells will be utilized on
these lots.
Sewer
Public sewer is not available to the lots. On-site septic systems will be utilized.
All septic site must have approval of the Department of Health and Human
Services.
Storm Drainage
The existing constructed Villages Scenic Parkway roadway system is adequately
handling any storm drainage issues. No further storm drainage improvements
are proposed at this time.
LANTECH, INC.. SURVEYORS . PLANNERS . ENGINEERS 3
440 W. BENSON BLVD., SUITE 103 . ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 . (907) 562-5291 . FAX 561-6626
Parks
Area parks include Chugach State Park located 400 feet to the west of this
property.
Hydrology and Drainage Impact.
These four lots will have very minimal impact to the local hydrology.
Police
Police protection is currently provided by the Anchorage Police Department.
Fire Safety
The Anchorage Fire Department currently provides services this area.
Traffic
Adding four lots to Villages Scenic Parkway will have very minimal impact. No
improvements are proposed.
Responses to page 3 of the Site Plan Application
The development of four lots will not have a permanent negative
impact on the items listed below substantially greater than that
anticipated from permitted development:
1. Pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and safety; The addition of only
four lots to the road infrastucture is very minimal and is within the design
criteria of the existing roads.
2. The demand for and availability of public services and facilities; Public sewer
is not available. It is substantially downhill from future sewer lines that will
possibly eventually enter into the parcel to the east from the extension of Potter
Valley Road.
LANTECH, INC.. SURVEYORS . PLANNERS . ENGINEERS 4
440 W. BENSON BLVD., SUITE 103 • ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 . (907) 562-5291 • FAX 561-6626
3. Noise, air, water or other forms of environmental pollution; The development
into four large lots will not impact these forms of environmental pollution.
4. The maintenance of compatible and efficient development patterns and land
use intensities; This parcel being developed as four large lots will in itself create
a compatible developmental pattern by buffering the R-6 lots to the west from
the possible future R-3SL development to the east.
Responses to E.1 of Site plan Application
a. Building footprints: The footprints of the houses will be determined by Title
21 setback requirements and by the individual homebuilder.
b. Parking Space Layout: Parking will be as per Title 21 and the building code.
c. Traffic and Pedestrian Circulation: Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be
on Villages Scenic Parkway.
d. Lighting & Signage: Since the lots front on an R-6 density developed street,
there will be no lighting or signage required.
e. Drainage/Grading: Drainage is managed by the existing shoulder drainage
ditching along Villages Scenic Parkway.
f. Landscape Plan: Justified by the large size of the lots, no landscaping is
proposed.
Thank you,
Mike Jokela, P.L.S.
Tom Dreyer, P.L.S.
Petitioners Representative
LANTECH, INC.. SURVEYORS . PLANNERS . ENGINEERS 5
440 W. BENSON BLVD., SUITE 103 . ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 . (9071562-5291 . FAX 561-6626
Villages View Estates West
Master Site Plan
4SSubdivision \ \ \ r
o i Vewpoint Sou"'
TR 81 ITR A-4 � / � TR A-1
00
- TR -9_ ---------------
4
--- 'TRA
i
i
I 1 I �Qi
J
.
\ � \ vEstates
s1ew
%
7� Vroct A -AE vdla9es
•%`
TR 18 ; \C
� N �
` N `
�
1 \�
r07. `
- t f %� Area previously in Area "(3•
' �% w4c ` of existing Master Site Plan.
Unsubdivided
TR 20
o oi h :�--------------
j O Q i
i
b
o���� Ydlo9es view Troais
Municipality of Anchorage'"
Development Services Department J'
% Building Safety Division
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 09/06/01
TO: Jerry T. Weaver, Jr., Platting Officer, CPD
FROM:m s Cross, PE, Program Manager, On -Site Water & Wastewater
SUBJECT: ?1Updated Comments on Cases
The On -Site Water & Wastewater Program has reviewed the following cases and has these
comments:
S-10764
Villages View Estates West.
Prior to approval of this proposed subdivision, the following must be accomplished:
1. For each lot in this proposed subdivision, three wastewater disposal system sites
shall be identified on the final plat per AMC 15.65.180.13.2. The areas to be used
for wastewater disposal systems must be designated on the plat as being
unavailable for use for driveways, parking areas or structures. It is possible that
lot lines will have to be moved to accomplish this.
2. An aquifer test shall be conducted within the proposed subdivision. This aquifer
test shall include one pumping well and a minimum of two observation wells.
The test procedures shall follow those proposed by Terrasat, Inc. in their report
entitled "Ground Water Evaluation for the proposed Villages View Estates
{Vest" dated June 20, 2001. This aquifier test shall show that there is an adequate
water supply to support the proposed subdivision and the effects of the
appropriation of water to serve this subdivision on adjoining properties.
3. To develop this property, only wastewater disposal systems that have been
approved as nitrogen reducing systems by the MOA shall be installed. A note to
this effect shall be placed on the final plat. These systems will be required by
code to undergo yearly maintenance and approval.
The above requirements should also address the concerns expressed by Mr. Gerald
B. Shearer in his letter dated August 28, 2001 regarding this proposed subdivision.
S-10811 Grand View Subdivision.
Prior to approval of this proposed subdivision, the following must be accomplished:
1. Detailed topographical information shall be provided for proposed lots 6, 7, 8,
and 9 showing that these lots meet the slope requirements of AMC 15.65,
Watewater Disposal Systems.
2. The soils logs of the test holes on this proposed subdivision shall be submitted on
an MOA approved form. Seasonal high groundwater monitoring results shall be
included.
3. Supporting documentation on water availability must be provided. This
documentation shall include an hydrologist's report stating the expected
quantities of groundwater available to this subdivision and the effects of the
appropriation of water to serve this subdivision on adjoining properties.
�%i r l i l y4 w n� e + , r .'R 1 s N.r !,r• r,, , h'i r.r ^.. �' ;'. aij s• �1Y
'^r' • Yrria M 5 rr.l a r t •'y tli ,.,M1.r 4y y r.
.,j 7.� � V r is l �•, `.; , r , 4� .f�.J �{ 1,. (+ h,f'/ r yr y� 'r r / y+, M 'M l'i, „,or ty
- ,r 11 �.A'II♦,ry, • I.
!'��'"/ ..M• r ;n .r f J ✓ a .y ,N u l p+ ,f• —
,11 } �Y'ri 1'la�.r �K,. ^' .Ir% I lr NF�r Yt.� '1. �.. i;'LM1i—`♦��` •,.-r,}rNauaa '��11.Y '�
..,{ i rr J r r i „ 1 J +''. •rl . �. '0.a : �_ w r�• l'_ \; J
41
!Lire ,} 1` rlA Iii,+'♦ ' 'r r:
•��`l a rf'i+ 1•"✓` k, +"l ,«a,.✓♦�a i1a•j,rJ.•1�4♦I 1iir 1 i 3 �.'.. y°Fir r {:•`1� ria
y7 rq ray `♦,+„�'•-♦.11"5lil"!;r lirY iV. ), •v 1� a • �i a '«, . rt
1 r.5,. u`i y4... ^4 rr,lrJsi..l! 11 .; i.+n sa..ry {4 K'�♦�'y trlot
,-.•-
. roa it � p.}"J r r �x rLa/r,C1�� a + • . .9 r!i IF� a '�.ii _}� •, r :;:�\ d. '41 y✓ar �
V,, ii ♦i , r L ) r% y iS JJ;...
{ a'+✓t U•.r. xr FY "i •y�, � t r r J r C � N ♦{ar r , +�. • . p"
p{ F , '
♦ 1M\ M"♦, r M '." dl " ,1 bow r 1
r•• i,r+�Jf �"i �✓'. "Ji i M ►,+YJ'•r`. {+ 1. �I •• � 4 +. 1 }`t p • �I• ✓ r. + 5q
J ! i '• .' rC ..:�•,\ t •,a, �\k' ° t,Y• .-; :. 1 i`11 L 7,,'}. •:
Sr•},r. r i , A J •. > ♦ ''r� lM. ..' A�t ' f~a �. `''�r`i 1 a .y, r♦ V w.i. ,,' f�" C c w 4. ll..,ry
M R• F ° ,ihir AFI.``I` •t'x v'1 11 .r •v:`'L
} h la»1 '': h•.• r " ,YL ✓ 11'' +Y* M•'9� w•• ✓ - ♦�. t 1fill •,p''-
•,r♦ `� .!. °r ,1.•,} .r (. V
or, {4'Y L..rr �, rl .� ♦4! +. h 1r
• r.,,.l V 1 yr i,� 1 F Y 'd0 r,Y ai t ✓ ♦ i' .r.: 'St♦ '4 . . Y 'r Y r r 1
w t �• ° X11.1 'i• ar;• 'r / .. G I .. n� Lr.".` A IiY {•. J• qi
d\lar Y'i ! ri.i. �L;4 �. .7/T � r;r } , •r� .a {`+r Y )r.i4i '1 �.y1 i ,Y
• ,• r i t 4. i.• a r • _ r q
. h.r• a44','IV�'{k d i 4 i. 'J.{/ . iT: . + ., �tr� • "'Y ?,� �
i • • r " , ( err ', .k y. .` wr\ /• so0
' rr au -! \ r • r,
5 r. (A t 2 ! , p ' ,.+5 iY . • "' ' � �� 04,•r,�'. ! Ix
F�•`v, • \L 1 �i♦� ''��rn.l.
J' 1 ♦ * tt .yl.h y� KIP ,I A .1-4'1* E� f
✓a •..► Jr.1 1. w w rr yr, I:a a 'i ft! r,i • i r,'w Am
• r t A,. ,r .. r ..
1 w'I Jr I� nYl .y rr. L� °0. ,.':• >" 11
Y MI .bF i ri ', Yr. X r r J.. i. � it // M• "'".• � �+�•e 5r �Ya `' J 1ri��.I
r :gin'.:+ I �1 �,� . '• Ir } + °� 1 '✓. 1. J 1 r .•,✓' r ,
r�l.r rl. jr Td r rw 'rl;y} 1'•r ,)"'Y 1M� 17 41 �a. Yr iy,,r 'r or
r."yl �, ' G.F }'rt i i . '• 17 ti ,�{iY * %`
%too
'JLC:i%' ( .:10
+,yl .� ,t '.s. •� ,1,«;•t.��'` �,R
Kr,4 R d Via. r V
t
`,r F'}J}v,,I� 1% V, ,,1 4Yf1 "�.ar� t.r/..�*�Yr.,1N
oi
MM a.,r t J; . t 1L �r�ll 1 ~Ivt • ,dt,til .Y \ rpr'1 �. � ..
�ti1� r wr-t71.. rw1 MR'• .I
i fLy� . N i •+A r IL +.j• w ! \'\`/ ♦ .. r`.•Lw r1 i k r+t `ooAW
"(+ °�,".•;�V �: �f '
�'T•♦ tiry • • •- it t`1 i \ 4.�� r • !�r t 7't r.a Y`•r✓�JY. rq i'1 i r• ; y��.r i ••1
•... tI /��+ �' " ..'y' i 1, ✓ ., F/ , :i t "• Y ! • ( .
f 1 �r'i { T" 1 y l J l ..` t�� II .l r. ti , "M 1jy♦oV n,4 �• '4 Rt or •t r�.
{ .\� ♦ j V i, r KI•x7::. r �.r^rJ'•r. ♦ 'r .} 'Yyy r` i I ('� 1
it
r�
J..rj'P i� �,ty�ir. 1 (�,�t it •{ P r.. �7r1 5 �. r!/(M.. �i to vJ ryi�..
r ,) fir. {,'.✓." °{ i" {• .:' A. ♦i.,r ' '7 S+ 'rR ' .ra' w J � � 4 r !1 ♦
(�� • JI: rh'1' �Arl. �.. +j,".. + tl �•\/'✓. r•,( ..r'r'l "�.,y • •r
r +�•. \ 11 MI' `.v *ar / r';P �+ L~., • �/M ..r rr'd'•". 14; � { i•! � . ;x ir{ J�. 'rib. �A.�irr a� r�
"y'•1 r U1 {N.. �4♦„ 7d+'r i(rgr�,1,4' .1. ♦7.rJ r..1 .� !•, .1µr i'",!.✓ b•.,�-r101',
.,,!}, 1. Y r M✓.) l'.T ^h �.. 4 i .,. - r .'\r?. +}' . 1'.{ , `�.a. ', 1� ► �. ., .a. q.yr+.
i r{� '. 'Y •i.11 a• 3 r.• ur ..
,.fLnr� ''li .'a♦br r'•' li 1•F r 1 �4 °•T5; nAAY,.14 xC.:,. �' f{ \rr
t Y♦' � ' +.� � 1 Y�r '' i t ,"f' 7 ww f 1 4 f � + • L «r51
v M.y.'S ` X74, fir\ ,. �I4 ! �}•r rr rtI �', 9v A J • V' 1
l/�•,i •l '
i, i
7 ° ") or, ,r��.,{..�
!'�' •L�i1i •.. G, ♦:5rt h it ri it �'� 51r• ♦ r� F.'�'Ar }F( . rL.
~Jr�.,�. ,r ♦. +" ��ri j,. ti �. � .. 11 V'1:., • � � w" }�r'J7r'4 'L+ 4�'r\Y r.�'..!!.
-1''r r+5♦a♦1+�1.{r Ar yt�=L \�� F~ !`�tiY'• ♦r�i
\ ,♦�} !w'i�•/'r •'1 t,
,; ;M ��♦Lr"% 4r•. rF`.11 �• S` r 1. �� YF IY7 M ti ♦`•v' j r ,y SY+,
..n.r .ii••Rliar NiC �'�.1M��}�;I'°�1,♦�T G/'� • 1 �.R •A� rr e
..r''I.X,. 1.r ,r, n4 �'ar�d'r �!• 1 `��.'f .r i ••�'.-1' 4 i � 1i lr r � A �
1tJ J�1: �;, ��• }+t°. �!r +,«I�t l,y;', Sd, d'►4� :.� �C_,. ��1` — �, yy.. - -.
�wf y� 7 • i y i.h t �,. ."1 7 ✓ r' 'r +� �"-W'� t y J N y rt
it
! ,d � (. V \ �'V �. � •r hw n y FF ..i' t + .� I,t y. �.: � �°q' � � 1►t
to
Y' '�, / prJ 1 •�f+li ti A � �vY � � yy} 1 wl!Y � v 1:r �. S �•�.y{. '"rY
q
.u'r •yr' � *rN Y• a�. " Ni ti. ,� M e X11 \, d"�.]� Mr. '..�,•
y` '�•-�JLn 9 ,� InJ irrl� �.,i41 4,_. r7 .� .'L y, yrY, FYI yr \nl yi n �'�L M,�.; i
ill'. w I�.1J1 df V� • -`: f y If.:
N+If\\�u/'f�Ni I ('./Y+„_ \� Y.'4.r �. y�_V I, .�, `n'Y b y•,
i 1Y /r
Y41
` SFr r it.r .,� ♦ + i F 4 •i r .1•i n ^ 4r'c �.., 1
i :i `w �! �"�„', � J w f � J 1\` �I �..� r w 1! �.�� y � ,..� r I '�•� •Y'w"' �p :!' 1
M • � b ! " l w +, ,� ✓ Al 1. r d, - r iN � ,� •,'{ r h ` ' 1' r ,'
. +.. ` • ': i0 +'r'. �. a 4� Yrlt 1� i,d�/Y 'T r•1� �., 1� 1i. ''1 °I ..lw q •, .�
t y 4y ! ,Ifs y I �,�. lr r 1•.� 1y. yq 1./ 1 4 � y' � A �Q M F i 1 f� /., � � y Jk.� r 4.1,
�`Lr. ' lw 1•'Mi '�4l r I. 1/1
11. •M1 IJ `rY",• w (.,� �'�f I•A• f ol.11lit
. Pr ti
♦i /4�,. �� y t rr .I„ T v'ttirf �', �) hw4 r �. r �1�i..U�.nu.{jM .l .{1 .r�•'�' 1.
'� � 4 ♦ J • i Y • rr�'I 11 �. ��! �� �V •q 1 �� ' a� q4y V f . 'a� � t'�
w., �. �� ! r,ri �+ \' `' f I���7 l•(..ytV 1 l lr +,r f( Y� ly .'.1.,A � y11
h .:'. 1 1' r ��. ''r ..; �./ `l¢•. v�I� � '1'�`M N r... r w�J �.r� y +. :• 1a �.
/., M,..+ �,� t �� ! yty... Y,+/��,t''Dr.�e/ � ;yr•. � �'. .-. '�` y •'..� 9 J: .JJ r 1 ,. y
\. ya " 1,f •1` ,iM ,� w �., .p,y ?7'h. • Iw,,. ♦/ a a1 -,,n Y�r
J . / '�R �!!r M ; ( , �,y-i rl f' ..V' ,•�. 'iR r 4,� •; r y y- ms's
� •' �r� ifa J°.. �f •' \:y � ,, I�(LM If .y i' y. `7 iy `.r-.y,ti ,l Mr''� 'i� 4i; Nf t i .f. .. -. f'
1, wl .0 1N 1 -JC w a✓y+ • !,I f ;• rYIf
lim
Aft
w ! aA. ,i,.�r k\ •J A ly.� y -' rti r r. 1y l..
ti,:
iTyA�•i p'y!qq '^' J:lr Aal,.q. '.,R 7'�A �e �p t I JI',^i� •f y "n, -ti �Y,L�'
�y fir ti,t 1I*Y lrpy ynr�...• ,. l itiF
1 4.3-1.
h + ♦ It ,7, . r � y �' � ie , l'.i' 4�`� • Jam, Yw •:i
r �
BEP -20-01 10:13 AM KEN KLEIN
3y3.yaao 1 /L°�
T� Jarry lJewvw-
9073434670 P.01
O/
ow f4\,e Kip,., Skfw0/.r k,
Sc'e'nic, ViGw Ma��r,
1.wS 1,y s c, ra.ry a. S��.0— "J'¢
for ZYbdr-oo,.,/7- b <ioivLAs, We, •-,ll w
4-t� hD» e,s wi /I bt M ueri I mo. lJkt4.✓-&v -Modu
Sl w Cwoss •t,�s�oro✓Gscss�s � a.c cep -f -s ) syia'Alo(st
4 -kc, beJrooZ1J,,;f"lL.--w.6eis bG i cQ c.w-fi�f� ee(
ot. s •L, fro o 4 wo +.e. -t- o 4-ku— P/a,. '
`% !3/ec,K ,�, ;.:rAepp-ovokJ— -r-or-
b bC�tree►„/.2. boar`. ) 441k
to i f ks w(— iw r. vc.( -Fro s,. 't (to_ pl a vu,,%.i
�0.
/0T 0"C-6116( 64t,
L I
���0..� k,l!o er fro -i-k.t., vD✓.�oC r,c�a►^"�' hw►w�awS C.t44 r(y Ok- 41%a, Pkat) yok. Ks.owj
f bed /64x , wu.�,,,bus wa1 6.C, +f -a , sibd e f
$a ti W (i�uJ�/("O 153 t..�►u� eL PLV Ntit / Po r
r�evv ;s "-t a. s;71e,-9 b�o2/�. 6.1�
2r4&4.0-4 M wl a h V o V r b L Y;Kj a.
7j a,eb-L vim lv4 wiU I,; IA 61,
IQ,,9� �oN.tL, � Know l;t%t er a.�ouil re�icsl
w4.ltsJti..wwir �'h�w�Q �y coku-v-wr.
09/12/01 10:10 FAX 907 343 .4220 Community Planning el001
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
Comm unity.Planning & Development
P.O. Box 196650
Anchorage, AK 99519.6650
Fax Cover Sheet
DATE: ?2ra j
TO: C'oszag PHONE:
FAX:
FROM: G±PHONE:
FAX:
RE:
CC:
Number of pages including cover sheet: ,
Message
��,�, a- iso /,� -�.t:s -�� .
09/12/0110:10 F,sj 907 343 4220 Community Planning
Municipality of Anchorage
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 12, 2001
TO: James Cross, PE Program Manager, On -Site Services
FROM: Cathy Hamm Nor Planner
Planning Department
SUBJECT: Hillside Wastewater Management Plan Amendment Request
PZC Case 2001-093
I'm forwarding some additional information regarding Case 2001-093, a request
to amend the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan (HWMP), which you have
already reviewed. The attached report on groundwater nitrates was just
received Monday, September 10. The hearing on the amendment request is
scheduled for Monday September 17. If you get a chance, would you take a
look at this report? We will request formal comments from you later, but I
thought it might be helpful to hear what you think about this latest information.
My number is 343-4245. Thanks!
16002
09/12/01 10:10 FAS 907 343 4220 Communit9 Planning 2003
TIEVRASAT, INCe
1413 West 310 Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Phone: (907) 344-9370 FAX: (907) 344-1490
Geological Consulting a Environmental Restoration a Regulatory Compliance
August 2, 2001
RECFIVED
Kin Shaw and Son Shaw SEP i 0 2001
P.O. Box 110637 MUNICIPAUTYOF ANCHORAGE
Anchorage, AK 99511 COMMUNIrr PtAINNG&DevEWMENT
RE: Ground Water Evaluation Supplemental: Evaluation of Ground Water Nitrates
for the Proposed Village View Estates West Subdivision
Dear Mr. Shaw:
TERRASAT, INC. is pleased to present the results of our investigation of the available
nitrate data from water wells located within a'h-mile radius of the proposed Village View
Estates West subdivision (Figure 1). As a supplement to our ground water investigation, we
reviewed the Municipality of Anchorage's water and wastewater database and microfiche
files searching for nitrate records for local drinking water wells. We found records for nitrate
analyses for seven of the 16 water wells identified in our original ground water investigation.
In addition, we found nitrate data for a 17'h well that had been improperly filed at the MOA
offices'. Dates for the eight nitrate analyses range between March 1991 and December 1998.
The concentration of nitrates ranges from 6.6 mg/1 (6.6 -ppm) to 0.100 ing/1 (0.100 -ppm).
The EPA has established a maximum level for nitrates in drinking water at a concentration of
10 mg/1 (10 -ppm).
Nitrates typically enter ground water from untreated or improperly treated effluent released
from inadequate or damaged septic systems. Excess nitrates may also occur below horse
paddocks. For the Anchorage hillside with areas that have ' shallow bedrock, nitrate
contaminants typically migrate downward to the sediment/bedrock interface then follow this
interface down the hill slope. Improperly installed water wells that intercept this interface
may allow nitrates to infiltrate into rock fractures that are a source of drinking water.
Nitrates may also enter ground water by rock fractures that intercept the sediment/bedrock
interface.
Medical studies suggest a correlation between nitrate concentrations in drinking water and
human health issues. We believe nitrates are much less of a health hazard than bacteria and
viruses that enter ground water along with nitrates from failed septic systems.
We evaluated the spatial distribution of the nitrates in the local water wells to determine if
the ground water showed evidence of nitrate contamination (Figure 1). We found in records
' The dare from this new well dors not change our findings or recommendations from our original ground
water investigation.
of eight water wells where nitrate analyses had been conducted, that all showed low to
moderate levels of nitrates in the water (Table 1)• We found no obvious correlation between
nitrate concentration and geologic structures such as faults or major rock fractures. The data
also does not appear to correlate with depth to bedrock or the thickness of sediment cover.
We find that the various concentrations of nitrate measured in the wells indicate the source of
the nitrates is likely local to the affected wells. We conclude that the nitrate distribution in
this area is not controlled by regional factors and we expect the aquifer beneath the proposed
subdivision to have nitrate concentrations similar or lower than surrounding areas.
We used a mathematical model to estimate the amount of nitrate that we would expect will
be added to the aquifer from the development of the proposed subdivision. Our model
assumes that the average household will generate about 2,271 -milligrams of nitrate per day.
This value is based on nitrate production tables for residential wastewater as published in the
EPA's Onsite Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Design Manual (Table 4-3, page 56). The
subdivision plat shows four lots are planned for development, thus a total of 9,085 -
milligrams of nitrate are expected to be produced within the subdivision per day.
This mass of nitrate will have to percolate through the soil before entering the ground water.
The percolation rate for the soils in Village View Estates ranges from 1- to 5 -inches per
minute. The nitrate that leaves the subdivision is diluted from mixing with the volume of
ground water that is in the sediment and weathered bedrock beneath the subdivision. To
calculate the volume of water that leaves the subdivision each day we estimated the seepage
rate for ground water and multiplied this rate by the length of the subdivision and the
thickness of the water in the aquifer. For our model, we assumed an average water thickness
of 2 -feet and length for the subdivision of 1,400 -feet. We estimated the seepage velocity
(32.4-ft/day) using a porosity value of 35% for the gravelly sand soil typical of the
subdivision. Accordingly, our calculation for the volume of water that moves from beneath
the subdivision each day is about 345,000 -liters. Thus, 9,085 -milligrams of nitrate will be
diluted by 345,000 -liters of water generating an estimated nitrate load of 0.029-
milligrams/liter. This value is below EPA's maximum level for nitrates (10 -ppm). We have
used conservative values in our model to estimate nitrate loading and predict nitrate
concentrations. Our model shows that the nitrate load expected for the proposed subdivision
is far below regulated levels. In conclusion, our model suggests that the nitrate load from the
residence will have an insignificant impact on the aquifer, producing nitrate levels below the
instrument detection limits of standard laboratory drinking water analyses.
Based on our findings we recommend the following to m+nui rzc the risk of nitrate
contamination to the aquifer beneath the proposed subdivision.
1. All water wells installed within the proposed subdivision should be cased into the
bedrock
2. The casing should be adequately grouted at the sediment/bedrock boundary to
provide a barrier that minimizes the potential for nitrates to infiltrate the well. We
recommend at least a 20 -foot bentonite grout seal into the rock.
3. Each septic system installed at the proposed subdivision should be designed with
sufficient capacity and efficiency to handle the waste generated by each residence
09/12/01 10:11 FAS 907 333 4220 Community Planning Q) 003
to prevent the possible release of nitrates to- local ground water. In addition, the
installation of an intermittent bottomless sand filter system (ISF) would eliminate
bacteria and viruses from the effluent.
TERRASAT, INC. has conducted this study in a manner consistent with the level of skill
ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar
conditions. No other warranties expressed of implied are made. The recommendations and
data contained herein are prepared for Kin Shaw, Son Shaw, and their appointed
representatives. This report is intended only for use at this site in accordance with the
purposes described by this study. If you have any questions, please contact us at 344-9370.
Professional Signatures
Bill Lawrence
Senior Hydrogeologist
/OV
Dan Young
Certified Professional Geologist
Ground Water Professional
09/12/01 10:12 FAX 907 34J 4220 Community Planning Z 006
r41
U
a
U.
LL
LLLLLL
U.
U.
LL
U.LLLL
LL
LL
LLLLLL
u-
y,F
o-wwIxwmmn:0:Ma:MatM0:a:x
O Y
t
on
wI--
c4o�rn
U')
m m
Om
OOZ
�QZZZtV
^�ZZ2NZZo
E
n
c0
-�
:-
O
O
Z
v
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
rm
T
0
<�N
N
N
1�cIJ
In
Nd
t7NN�tp
f7
RM
O^to
M
in
rp^mash
�1f7
�m
W
d
min
In
(7
�
t0
tD
t0
h{hD
h�Oh
z
tD
�t0
z
Z
a«�
0
o�soa
o
y
M.9
cc`NY
W
Wrh'
r�F2
WO
m
d
m
mcq
IV
m
.Em
a
o
ea
a
a
m
0
y
m=
m
m
m�FL-F�
L
m
c
z
m
z
t
m
IL-~
br��L
m
>�>;�
A
10
_
W
r
O
Ln
In
00000M00u'f
u"i000
d
CIJwn��ti�cfOo�v�rnn���c�°o
W
ON
DC7
LO
UI)
m�J
.m-c7N�NN
Z
Z
Z
noom,n.-Cnoornr.00
M
N,04
mNMM
N
Q
M
M"N
N�
lei
Q
N
In
QI
n
co
h
c9
)
'MIDI
D1�1011,tlt2
O
---
.h
w
[Click here and type address]
facsimile �r�nsnu
To: Mr. Gerald Shearer
From: James Cross
Fax: 907 345-4615
Date: 1/4/2002
Re: Hydrologist's Report Pages: 8 (including cover letter)
CC:
13 Urgent X For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply ❑ please Recycle
r^, e
/ ' tAp,I have attached only the text of the report fora couple of reasons.
• There are some figures (site maps that you are familiar with) that are in color
and will not fax well.
-a �. • The well flow test data just supports the report, and you may check it at our
meeting next week
• The well logs may also be viewed at our meeting.
If you would like either the test data or well logs, either call me at 343-7906 or stop at
our offices at 4700 South Bragaw (Permitting Center atTudor and Bragaw).
Best Regards,
Jim Cross
.......................
jERRASAT, INC. .
1413 West 31# Avenue, Anchorage, -AK 99503 (907) 344-9370 -
..Geological Consulting Environmental Restoration Regulatory Compliance
Aquifer Test and Data Evaluation
for the proposed
Villages View Estates West
Prepared for:
Kin Shaw and Son Shaw
P. O. Box 110637
Anchorage, AK 99511
By:
TERRASAT, INC.
1413 West 31" Avenue
Anchorage, AK 99503
December 20, 2001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................1
Site Description.............................................................................................................. I
SITECONDITIONS.....................................................................................1
STEPTEST....................................................................................................1
AQUIFERTESTS..........................................................................................2
DATA INTERPRETATION........................................................................2
Tracesn1 issi vity................................................................................................................ 2
Storati vity....................................................................................................................... 2
Specific Capacity and Long -Teri Yields...................................................................... 3
GISEVALUATION......................................................................................3
COMPUTERMODELING..........................................................................3
CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................4
Local Aquifers and Well Yields..................................................................................... 4
E.rpectedYields.............................................................................................................. 4
PotentialImpacts to Surrounding Users....................................................................... 4
RECO ,NI N1 ENDATI ONS.............................................................................. 5
PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURES...............................................................5
APPENDICES
Appendix A Well Logs
Appendix B Aquifer Test Data
FIGURES
Figure 1
Site Location Map
Figure 2
Water Well Locations
Figure 3
Semi -log plot of t/t' vs. residual drawdown at Lot 3
Figure 4
Log -log plot of time vs. drawdown at Lot 2
Figure 5
Semi -log plot of t/t' vs. residual drawdown at Lot 2
Figure 6
Semi -log plot of time vs. drawdown at Lot 2
Figure 7
Semi -log plot of time after pumping vs. calculated recovery at Lot 2
Figure 8
Calculations of Specific Capacity (Theoretical) for a pumping well
Figure 9
Static Water Elevations in Drinking Nater Wells
APPENDICES
Appendix A Well Logs
Appendix B Aquifer Test Data
INTRODUCTION
Kin Shaw and Son Shaw contracted TERRASAT, INC., to conduct an aquifer test in the
t Proposed Villages View Estates West Subdivision, Anchorage, Alaska. Our objectives for this
project are to evaluate the aquifer test results to determine the long-term capacity of the aquifer
and the nature of the aquifer and determine the potential impacts to water wells in the
surrounding area. Our scope of services includes:
• Conducting a short-term aquifer test to estimate an appropriate discharge rate for the
long-term test.
• Conducting a long-term test aquifer test to evaluate the production capabilities of wells
in the proposed subdivision.
• Determining the likelihood that the proposed subdivision will impact the surrounding
well users.
Site Description
The Proposed Villages View Estates West Subdivision is located east of the Villages Scenic
Parkway, south of Potter Valley Road in Anchorage, Alaska (Figure 1). The sectional
description for the area is the SW 1/4 Section 14, Township i l North, Range 3 West, Seward
Meridian.
SITE CONDITIONS
M -W Drilling, Inc., completed wells on Lots 2, 3, & 4 in the proposed subdivision on October
19, 2001 (Figure 2). Each well is constructed with 6" steel casing, which is grouted
approximately 20 feet into bedrock. The wells are completed open -hole in bedrock and
intercept water from fractures in the bedrock. The well on Lot 2 is 368 feet deep, with casing
extending to approximately 41 feet below ground surface, based on the well construction
' diagram (Appendix A). The static water level is approximately 1 foot above casing. This well
is located approximately 80 feet north of the well on Lot 3. The well on Lot 3 is 367 feet deep,
with casing extending approximately 29 feet below ground surface, based on the well
construction diagram (Appendix A). The static water level is approximately I foot below the
top of casing. The well on Lot 4 is 468 feet deep, with casing extending approximately 44 feet
below ground surface, based on the well construction diagram (Appendix A). The static water
level is approximately 24 feet below the top of casing. This well is located approximately 327
feet south of the well on Lot 3.
STEP TEST
TERRASAT, INC., installed water level monitoring equipment in each well on October 30,
2001. M -W Drilling, Inc., installed a pump at Lot 3 and conducted a step -drawdown test on
October 30, 2001. The available drawdown above the top of the pump was 299 feet. We
pumped for four 22 -minute intervals, with increasing discharge rates of 1.2, 1.7, 3.7, and 4.0
gpm, with a total drawdown of approximately 100 feet. This well recovered at a rate of 2 gpm
immediately following the step test. Results of the step test suggested that a pumping rate of 3
gpm should result in 70% to 90% drawdown in the production well at the end of the 24-hour
test period.
P:\20110t3 - ViliView Aquifer Test\12-20-01 V View Aq test report.doc Page I of
.. •t-. It 1 r...r-"' •' -. - - .. .. ..
'>
AQUIFER TESTS
Aquifer drawdown and recovery tests were conducted at the well on Lot 3 from November 2 to
November 5, 2001 following recovery'from the step test. The well was pumped at a nearly
continuous rate of 2.3 gpin'for,2-2hours' The _production well (Lot 3) and two observation
wells (Lot 2 and Lot 4) were monitored during the test. Results from the test are presented in
Appendix B. Total drawdown in the production well at the end of the 22 hours was 205 feet.
Drawdown at Lot 2 was 25 feet.';We detected no drawdown due to pumping in the well on Lot
4. The water level fluctuations observed in this well resulted from lunar cycles and changes in
barometric pressure.
We conducted an additional shoit=
storativity of the rock. This value is more representative of the aquifer as a whole when
estimating long-term production. Storativity values calculated using data from Lot 2 range:•;':
from about 0.000037 to 0.0016 (Figures 4, 6, & 7). Published literature suggests that these'
values are within the expected range for a fractured bedrock aquifer. f
Specific Capacity and Long -Term Yields
We selected representative transmissivity and storativity values to estimate the specific yield
and maximum sustainable pumping rates for long-term pumping from each well..-: -W,,,
transmissivity of 8 gpd/It was selected as an estimate of the aquifer capability. A storativity of
0.0001 was selected as an estimate from the aquifer test analyses. Specific capacities and.
discharge rates for continuous pumping of the well for %2, 1, 10, and 20 years are shown:n%
Figure 8. Results indicate that each well should be able to support a pumping rate of 1.0 gpm.*,
for ten years of continuous pumping. -
GIS Evaluation
We used a Geographical Information System (GIS) to determine if wells in close proximity.'.
have similar static ground water elevations. This is important because wells grouped ,
according to static water elevations generally have good hydraulic connection. This evaluation
allows us to identify different aquifers and determine if it is likely that additional wells -would
impact existing wells.
The static water levels plotted in Figure 9 show general north -south trends. These trends
suggest that the fracture systems intercepted by water wells have strong north -south"
components. This supports findings in our earlier report where photo interpretation results
showed a possible north -south trending fault near the proposed subdivision. The presence of,
strong north -south trends in the water level data suggest that the aquifers may show little or no
hydraulic connection in an east -west manner.
Computer Modeling
TERRASAT, INC. conducted computer modeling to estimate how the aquifer will respond to
long-term pumping. Results of the computer simulation suggest that the Theis model gives a
reasonable approximation for the expected drawdown in an observation well for a simulation
of long-term pumping. We ran a simulation of the wells on Lots 2 and 3 with a constant
discharge rate of 1 gpm to estimate the well interference. Our simulation results suggest that
the interference and additional drawdown at these wells should not cause the water elevation to
exceed the available drawdown for up to two years of continuous pumping. This estimate is
very conservative, as it does not consider recovery that would occur between pumping cycles.
Intermittent pumping allows the wells to recharge, thus allowing the user to remove more
water from the well.
TERRASAT, INC. conducted computer modeling to estimate the potential impacts to
surrounding well users. We made a worst-case assumption by simulating a single east -west
fracture system that spans the distance of two subdivisions. Our simulation considered four
wells in the same fracture system (three in the proposed subdivision and one in the nearest
subdivision), with each pumping continuously at 0.5 gpm for one year. The simulation'results
suggest that a well in the same fracture system, located 500 feet from three wells in'the
proposed subdivision, could experience up to 50 feet of water level decline due to well
p:\201 I OB - VillView Aquifer Test\I2-20-01 V View Aq test report.doc page 3 0f5'
PANT I0t3 - ViliView Aquifer Test112-20-01 V View Aq test report.doc Page 4 of 5
interference. This situation is very unlikely to be representative of actual site"conditiohs' based
on the evaluation of available water level data from existing wells (Figure) A wide range of
ground water elevations suggests that many different fracture systems, with varying amounts
of pressure head, exist in the area. This interpretation is furthm
er supported by,th6 I8ng-ter
aquifer test in which no apparent connection was observed between the welts on I:ots•3 and 4,
+n
which are less than 350 feet apart. Thus, there is a very.low'probabtli' hat .wells in the
proposed subdivision will impact the surrounding well users.
Conclusions
Local Aquifers and Well Yields
Past ground water studies conducted by TERRASAT, INC, on the hillside in:Anchorage,
suggested that most wells in bedrock aquifers near Potter Valley typically produce less'than 0.5
gpm. This production rate is generally considered marginally adequate-for,single-family,
homes, based on the Municipality determination that a well provides adequate`' water if it
produces 150 gallons per day per bedroom (0.10 gpm). Based on tests-perfortned at the
proposed Villages View Estates West subdivision, a sustained rate of 1.0 gpm appears likely,
thus meeting this criteria. Furthermore, the wells in the proposed subdivision appear to be
capable of long-term production at 1.0 gpm and should be considered adequate for homes with
up to nine bedrooms.
Erpected Yields
The aquifers (fracture systems) exploited by wells in the proposed Villages View Estates West
subdivision have high head pressures (high static water levels). This suggests that the water
recharging the fractures likely comes from high -elevation areas in the Chugach Mountains.
Both the short and long aquifer tests conducted at these wells suggest that the fractures from
which the water is extracted and the rate at which the water can be pumped are small. This
means that these aquifers may experience long-term water level decline if the pumping rate
exceeds recharge. Computer modeling supports this conclusion, which shows the potential for
significant water level decline after only a few years of pumping. This is consistent with what
we would expect in a rock aquifer with a low density of water -bearing fractures.
r
The aquifer test evaluation and computer modeling we conducted are conservative models that
overestimate drawdown and long-term water level decline. Thus, a factor of safety is
incorporated into each analysis. Aquifer tests and computer modeling conducted for the
proposed subdivision show that long-term pumping at rates of approximately 1.0 gpm should
not cause well interference beyond available head. This means that a well on each lot in the
proposed Villages View Estates West subdivision should be adequate for a home with up to
nine bedrooms.
Potential Impacts to Surrounding Users
Interpretation of the aquifer tests performed and available static water level data for nearby
t'
water wells suggest that a connection between rock fracture aquifer systems in the proposed
Villages View Estates West subdivision and those in The Villages subdivision is very unlikely.
This is further supported by the apparent north -south trend in local fracture systems as
interpreted from aerial photographs. This means that the hydraulic connection in an east -west
manner is likely very small and that little to no impact is expected at wells in The Villages
subdivision.
PANT I0t3 - ViliView Aquifer Test112-20-01 V View Aq test report.doc Page 4 of 5
The aquifer tests conducted were limited to monitoring impacts to the wells in the proposed
subdivision. Thus, no data exists to determine if the water wells in the proposed subdivision
are hydraulically connected to those in the adjacent subdivision. Computer modeling of a very
unlikely and worst case situation, suggests that if the wells were in the same group of rock
fractures (same aquifer), the wells could experience up to 50 feet of water level decline after
one year. The information provided from aerial photography, water levels, and aquifer tests,
however, suggests that this simulation does not likely representative of actual site conditions.
Recommendations
The proposed wells appear to meet MOA required flow criteria. if higher flow_ rates are
desired, however, a water -well development method, known as hydro -fracturing, may be
applicable. This method uses pressurized water and pea gravel to propagate and hold open the
existing fractures. Well yields increase as additional water -bearing fractures are intercepted,
making more water available to the well. This method effectively increases the aquifer size,
which can improve the well yield while decreasing the amount of long-term water level
decline. TERRASAT, INC. recommends using this method on a case-by-case situation to
achieve high volumes.
Aquifer tests and computer modeling show that the wells in the proposed subdivision arc
adequate to support houses with up to nine bedrooms, based on the Municipality standard of
150 gallons per day per bedroom. To avoid excessive amounts of drawdown during high -use
times (morning & evening), we recommend using well storage tanks to minimize the length of
pumping cycles and maximize the time for recharge between pumping cycles. This will allow
more time for the aquifer to recover, which may delay long-term water level decline and
preserve the aquifer.
The data presented in this report should be considered representative of the time of our site
observations. Changes in the conditions of the property can occur with the passage of time.
The findings we have presented within this report are based on limited test data; they should
not be construed as a definite conclusion about aquifer characteristics at the site. In the event
that future studies encounter subsurface conditions that appear different from those we
encountered, we should be advised so we can review those conditions and reconsider our
interpretations.
Please contact us at 344-9370 if you have any questions.
Professional Signatures ^I►,\\\
'✓G1� f7v
Bill La. rence Dan Young �J
Senior flydrogcologist Certified Professional Geologist
Ground Water Professional
PA2011013 - VillView Aquifer Test\12-20-01 V Vicw Aq test report.doc Page 5 of 5
HP,OfficeJet
Personal Printer/Fax/Copier
93454615
sao
Fax Log Report for
Permit Counter
907 343 8250
Jan -04-02 01:45 PM
OK 08 Sent Jan -04 01:40P 00:05:27 002586030022
19850 Villages Scenic Pky.
Anchorage Alaska 99516
August 28, 2001
Municipality of Anchorage
Planning and Zoning Commission
P.O. Box 196650
Anchorage Alaska 99519-6650
RE: Planning Department Case Number S 10764
Planning Department Case Number 2001-081
Planning Department Case Number 2001-093
Dear Sir or Madam:
There are two fundamental questions that must be adequately addressed before any new
development utilizing onsite sewer and water is approved. First, are there adequate
groundwater supplies to furnish the new residences with water without adversely
affecting existing wells? Secondly, will the new septic systems result in contamination or
degradation of the existing wells? The petitioners have not adequately addressed these
questions.
I am an engineering geologist by trade and have a masters degree in hydrology. I am also
one of the members of the Board of Supervisors, Villages Scenic Parkway LRSA. I have
lived for 16 years on property adjacent and immediately downslope from the subject
property.
Site Conditions
The property being considered in these hearings has shallow bedrock. Most of the
property has I to 3 feet of organic soil over 1 to 4 feet of fractured bedrock grading into
firm bedrock. Driving along Villages Scenic Parkway, which skirts the property on the
west side, one will observe bedrock outcrops along the entire margin of the property. A
backhoe work for 2 eight-hour days attempting to find sites with sufficient soil cover to
perform perk tests. Most of the time the backhoe bucket struck firm bedrock with its first
penetration into the soil. The water table on this tract of land varies from being at the
surface to being at a depth of a few tens of feet.
All wells in the area are completed in bedrock. Nearly all the wells in the immediate
vicinity of the subject property are 300 to 400 feet deep and are of relatively low yield,
which is typical of bedrock wells. The property is steep. Virtually the entire tract
exceeds a 25% slope and a considerable portion approaches or exceeds a 50% slope.
This is not lower hillside terrain. It is nearly an alpine terrain.
My property borders the subject property. My well is 340 feet deep. The depth to
bedrock is 4 feet. The log shows 7 feet because I had to blast a trench from the well to
my building site to bury my water line. The yield of my well varies from winter to
summer. This variation leads me to believe that the water is derived from a nearby rather
than a distant source. This is important because it has implications on water availability
and susceptibility to contamination.
Nater availability
As stated above, it is my belief that the water entering my well is coming from fracture
porosity of bedrock in the vicinity of my property rather than from a distant source. The
development of additional wells will very likely draw down the water table and will
affect the yield of my well. As the yield of my well is marginal at times for my family's
needs, I need some assurance that additional users of the reservoir will not degrade the
production of my well.
I would like to see an aquifer test performed similar to the one recommended by Terrasat,
Inc. in the petitioner's supporting documentation. This aquifer test should be completed
prior to removing any additional land from the Hillside Wastewater Management Plan
(Planning Department Case No. 2001-093), or further subdividing the subject tract of
land into 5 lots (Planning Department Case No. S 10764). The well test will give me
some confidence that my well is not going to go dry because the subdivision that is being
considered. Less than three years ago, the petitioner was allowed to remove these lands
from the hillside Wastewater Management Plan (HWMP) and was authorized 2 building
sites with onsite well and septic. Now the petitioners propose 5 lots with wells and septic.
Septic System Issues
The steep groundwater gradient, the fractured bedrock providing the porosity and
permeability to store and transport groundwater to our wells and my belief that our wells
are sourced from the immediate vicinity rather than from a distance leads me to believe
that there is a significant risk of contamination from septic systems up -gradient from
mine and my neighbor's wells. I think we are all aware of the elevated nitrate levels in
some of the wells on the hillside. Some of the wells in my neighborhood have high
nitrate counts. I am concerned that this development as well as similar developments
with onsite well and septic being proposed by large property owners in the area will
heighten the nitrate concentrations in the groundwater to unhealthy levels. I know that
there are septic system designs that are reported to be safe from release of nitrates as well
as the other common contaminates. However, all septic systems fail eventually. In
addition, there is always the risk that the contractor cut comers to make the system work
or to save money. I know that septic systems are inspected to try to insure compliance.
However, one of my neighbors discovered that the contractor that installed his septic
system spliced his drain field pipes together with duct tape. Contamination from
inadequate septic systems will be a continuing problem on the entire Anchorage hillside
as housing density increases. The Municipality must insure that further subdivision of
property with onsite septic systems do not adversely affect existing developed property.
Recommendations
1. Before considering any of these petitions, there should be a well test performed to
provide the adjacent property owners and the Municipality with the some assurance that
there is an adequate quantity of water in the aquifer to permit the development of
additional wells.
2. If the subdivision is approved after a successful aquifer test, there should be
conditions applied to the development that would require the most advanced septic
system design currently in use in the Municipality. The construction needs to be closely
inspected. It should be clear that the success of onsite septic sustems on this property is
marginal at best and demands the best and latest technology.
3. Finally, once the septic systems are in use, there must be mandatory yearly
inspections by a licensed engineer to insure that the septic systems are functioning
properly.
Thank you very much for your consideration on this matter.
Sincerely,
Gerald B. Shearer
Cc: Jim Cross, Department of Health and Human Services
Jerry Weaver, Supervisor, Platting Section, DCPD
VILLAGES VIEW ESTATES WEST
PRELIMINARY
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS
The following drainage analysis is for the proposed development of Villages View
Estates West, a 19.4 ac parcel located at the end of Villages Scenic Pkwy. The proposed
development consists of 4 large single-family residential lots and 1 tract ranging from
3.44 ac up to 4.6 ac. On site wells and septic systems are proposed.
EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN:
The existing topography ranges from an elevation of approximately 1140 at the easterly
side of Tract A down to elevation 760 at the westerly side of Lot 1. The site is naturally
vegetated with the exception of a graded pad on the proposed Lot 1 and several trails as
shown on the attached asbuilt. Drainage is primarily sheet flow from the east in a
westerly direction.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS:
The proposed improvements will consist of single-family residents with associated
driveways as shown on the attached site plan. A common drive for Lots 2, 3 & 4 are
proposed with the existing access location proposed for Lot 1. The increase in the
amount of runoff due to this type of development is minimal.
House sites and all exposed areas will be landscaped. The existing trails will also be
seeded for erosion and sedimentation control. Driveways will be strip paved. Swales
adjacent to the driveways and the associated side slopes will be grassed to stabilize
disturbed areas. Rock check dams will be installed in the driveway swales to reduce the
runoff velocities and potential erosion. At selected locations, the driveway swales will be
diverted into the existing natural drainage swales where the undisturbed vegetation will
provide bio -filtration, infiltration, storm drainage velocity reduction, retention and
sedimentation control.
The goal of the proposed site drainage improvements is to provide proper water quality
and erosion control through the use of recognized best management practices. These
improvements are typical for a hillside residential development that uses natural and a
sensible approach to drainage and erosion control.
June 26, 2001 6
1107 4* JUL
Municipality of Anchorage
Building Safety Division
On -Site Water and Wastewater Program
4700 S. Bragaw Street
Anchorage, AK 99507
Attention: Jim Cross, P.E.
Subject: Villages View West Subdivision
Septic System Feasibility Study
Dear Jim:
t 8 2001
The owner of the property near the end of The Villages Scenic Parkway intends to
subdivide the property into 4 lots. Each lot will be in excess of 3.25 Acres in surface
area. A subsurface exploration study was completed on the property in two phases to
determine soil conditions and to find satisfactory areas for onsite septic systems. The
first study was completed in August of 1998 when 12 test holes were placed at the
lower elevations of the property. A second exploration was completed in May of 2001 to
study soils at higher elevations on the property.
All test holes revealed bedrock at varying depths. In most cases, however, a minimum
of 2' of unsaturated percable soil was found above the bedrock layer. Standard septic
systems will not be appropriate for this area and we are recommending the use of
bottomless sand filters to treat septic effluent generated by households developed on
these lots. An additional advantage of the sand filter system is the size of the
absorption bed, which is usually less than half the size of a standard absorption bed.
Three sites, which meet all the requirements of the Municipal Ordinance governing
septic systems, are required for each lot. Our study indicates these locations are
available.
Soils encountered in the holes revealed an organic layer at the surface, which varied in
depth from .5' to 2.5'. In every case the organics were underlain by loose sands or
loose sands and gravels with some silt. The percolation rate of these materials was
generally less than 1 minute per inch, but in areas with more silt slowed to 3 minutes
per inch. These soils are normally very good for the treatment of septic effluent. The
primary problem, however, appears to be the presence of bedrock. The use of the
nitrate reducing systems on the lots with shallow bedrock will provide additional,;
treatment to effluent before it enters the absorptive soil strata.
/...
Villages View West Subdivision
June 26, 2001
Page 2
The surface of the property slopes primarily from east to west with some cross slopes
from north to south. The slope from east to west in some cases exceeds 25%.
Systems will be located to maintain the required 50' separation from the 25% slopes in
conformance with Municipal regulations. Some slope flattening may be required which
can be accomplished during the development of the lots.
Further investigation regarding the actual slopes of the property in the area of the
proposed septic systems may be required before the final locations can be established.
It is our opinion, however, based on the results achieved from the subsurface soils
investigation that septic systems can be successfully placed on this property. In every
case, a sand filter system will be required due to the proximity of bedrock and the
limited area available meeting the slope setback requirements.
Enclosed are results from the test holes placed on the property. Please review the
attached information and advise if you have further questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Michael E. Anderson, P.E.
Attachments
RRA.GT CTB -l'
r
. • • i ' i �• (� TRACTA-41
-- ----- _ - - �--_--------- ---
I ---- -���
i
r T ----� a 1 _
'9f.. jii t\ 'TH2'f�\ Q V.•' `..�.: •=$-A•2 �
9 ane \ TH22
3.37,�.
\TH2w.
Ta. %:r.•%owe`° / '✓ 1 1
' �It
q rj 1 _
42
r�• \ ' b� 1
'
CT
s c
o \
B00
780�
710760
V\ 2°
\ ABB 7 \••`
00.
TEST HOLE LOCATION PLAN
SCALE 1" = 200' 1
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
Performed For. Kin Shaw Date Performed: 517/01
Legal Description: Lot 2_ Villages Vi ew West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN
1�
1 --Z— PTIOL
4
GP
Bedrock
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered? No
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
11 Date: 5117101
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
See Site Plan
Depth To CNet
Perc. Rate: >1 MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter. 6"
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Fl.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael E- Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6125/01
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
Performed For. Kin Shaw Date Performed:
Legal Description: Lot 2. Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN
1~
1 PT/0L
2
GP
3
4 Bedrock
5
TESTHOLE NO, 21
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered? No
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
11 Date: 5117101
1
Reading jDate
517101
See Site Plan
Perc. Rate: >1 MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter. 6"
Test Run Between 5 Ft. and 6 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harnla. I, Michael E. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6/25101
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
Performed For. lin Shaw Date Performed: 5/7/01
Legal Description: Lot 2. Vllaces View West Subdivision
SLOPE_ SITE PLAN
I � I PT/OL
2
GM
3
TESTHOLE NO. 22
4 1 Some Silt
5� Bedrock
C
E
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered? No
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
11 Date: 5117101
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
See Site Plan
Perc. Rate: >1 MinJlnch Perc. Hole Diameter. 6*
Test Run Between 5 Ft. and 6 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala I, Michael F Anderson, Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6125101
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
Performed For. Kin Shaw Date Performed: 5/7/01
Legal Description: Lot 2 Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN .
1 M PT/OL
2
GP/SP
3
4JW
Bedrock
5
E
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered? No
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
11 Date: 5/17/01
1
1
1
1
See Site Plan
To
Perc. Rate: >1 MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter. 6'
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael F. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6125101
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health 8 Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
Performed For. Kin Shaw Date Performed: 5/7101
Legal Description: Lot 2. Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE PLAN
1 t� PT/OL
4
GP/GM
Bedrock
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered?
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring
11 Date:
14
15
16
17
18
See Site Plan
Yes
5.
5'
5/17/01
Perc. Rate: >1 Min./Inch Perc. Hole Diameter. 6"
Test Run Between 2 FL and 3 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Harala. I, Michael E Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6/25101
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
Performed For: Kin Shaw Date Performed:
Legal Description: Lot 3_ Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE P
4
PT/OL
GPISP
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered?
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
11 Date: 5/17/01
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5/7/01
See Site Plan
Perc. Rate: >1 MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter. 6"
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Haraln. I, Michael E. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6125/01
Municipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Human Services
825 L Street, Anchorage, AK 99502-0650
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
Performed For: Kin Shaw Date Performed:
Legal Description: Lot 3_ Villages View West Subdivision
SLOPE SITE P
1I^ I PT/OL
GM
Bedrock
Was Groundwater
9 Encountered?
If Yes, What Depth?
10 Depth to Water
After Monitoring None
11 Date: 5117101
14
15
16
17
18
5/7101
See Site Plan
Depth To
Perc. Rate: >1 MinAnch Perc. Hole Diameter. 6"
Test Run Between 2 Ft. and 3 Ft.
Comments: Percolation Cavity Presoaked Prior to Testing. Water Absorbed Immediately.
Performed By: Alan Hamla. 1, Michael E. Anderson Certify That This Test Was Performed
In Accordance With All State and Municipal Guidelines In Effect On This Date: 6125101
..NGINEERT.9�1.)
unof Anchomge
DEPARTMENT F�
OHEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES ~ '•f. K �' ^
VZ -V Street, Anchorage, Alaska 995=-O&50 c fl
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Beraaren ��I�<: ���;�. �• _ •�'`'.::
• DATE PERFORM;f 2!!9S'•+
F The.. Villa es Sub. Township, Flange, Sectiorr
r_cAL DEscRIPnoN• 4
7 �� gEG¢•ocic_
8
9
20
21
12
t3
14
15
61718 16-
17-
181
19
TESTHOLE NO. 1
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
IF YES• AT WHAT
DEPTH?
�rj.Noone a., 8/10/9E
SITE
R.wfng Dav Tr
Tun.
I WWww� I
Not
D
ropI
r
v
2-1
;o
3-
I
I
I
I
4-
4
1
1 I
I
I I
61
6
P,
1
7 �� gEG¢•ocic_
8
9
20
21
12
t3
14
15
61718 16-
17-
181
19
TESTHOLE NO. 1
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
IF YES• AT WHAT
DEPTH?
�rj.Noone a., 8/10/9E
SITE
R.wfng Dav Tr
Tun.
I WWww� I
Not
D
ropI
I
I
I
I
I
I I
1
1 I
I
I I
I
1
1 I
.
I
1
I
I
U <, ..
vERcoLAnoN RATE (+) PERc HOLE DIAMETER $
2r
TEST RUN BETWEEN 2 i FT AND
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEDBY: M• AndPrsnn IFY THATTHIS TESTWAS pERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL SATE AND MUNICPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DA T c DATE:
7'2-= (Rev. U&S)
ENGINEER'$ SEAQ }
Mankoarity of Anchorage r
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH S HUMAN SERVICES - +'.• • �: ;:• ''
8Z -L7 Street, Anchorage, Alaska 93502-0650
SOILS LOG —PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Beraaren c �, <:• . , • ....
DATE PERFORMED4-''8 .2 ..
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Villages Sub. Township, Range. Secton:
tZn
SLOPE SITE PLAN
I f,tR ( of
2 i GM
TESTHOLE NO. 2
4-
S_ s 5 LJ
6
7-7
\ IJE��GL
I
„
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? N0
IF YES, AT WHAT
DEPTH?
DOMm Maty a b1c8/10 9E
Ring IN= ( T,N
wD"m to
ater
D%oo
I •
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
• 1 1
UPERCOLATION RATE L I IItOIwmfwCn) PERC HOLE DIAMETER B u
TEST RUN BETWEEN Z I L FT AND EVA FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEosr. M_ Anderton I �ri..c.4t FIr THAT THIS TES WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON TM_ S DATE DATE;
72-00a IF". was) .
• t£NGIaE•srssEAcl
,_"....
•
Municipality of Anchorage ,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES -`
82S'L' Street Anchorage. Alaska 99502-0650 '~
SOILS LOG - PERCOumON TEST ;I>t'. .i' �`1�;: J _
PERFORMED FOR: John Beroaren :''' }'="= ••
DATE PERFORMED; �-• 8 /2 /98 .'
LEGAL oESCRIPTION: The Villages Sub. Township. Range. Section: •i �b•ti•:: :�_�.�`Y
Ion
2 :.
3 -a
4 a
S 'a
i•.
7-
12-
13-
14-
Is -
16. 1213141516
17
18
19
20
TESTHOLE NO. 3
GxAf
6DTL0 cx—�
P
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED?
IF YES, ATwHAT
DEPTH?
SLOPE
No
Dal watur
m,W N A&W
bm 8/10/9E
ir—m
P—Com Dan � Tun. VY*t I Onm
I
I I
I I 1
1 I
I I
- I 1
1GI u
u
PERCOLATION RATE Irtun�aeyu�l PMC MOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN Z •t/ L FT AND 3 I/L FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMED BY: M- Andprann 1 THATIS WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIOEUNES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE OATZc ����/ 7 B
72-= (Ret. 4u85)
Municiparlty Anchorage
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH d HUMAN SERVICES
925'1' Street, Anchorage. Alaska 99=-osW
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Beraaren DATE
LEGALauz mow The Villages Sub. Townslun Anm^ AAe-;n,
13 /%
i�
41516 14-
is -
16.
17-
Is-
19 -
201
7]81920
OL
TESTHOLE NO. 4
GW
a
SLOPE
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED) No
IF YES. AT WHAT
DEPTH?
�Ww t
;� Noone em 8/10/9f
i
R -.&V Oan •Gry� y Ner Death I Time Watirw Na
I Dna
I I
I I
I 1 I
1 1 1 1
I I
I
1 1 1
• PERCOLATION R < 1 ATE (m.nutcivxn) PERC MOLE CWAETER '$
TEST RUN BETWEEN 41IL- FT AND 5 rZ- FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMED BY: M- Andereon I _v✓I-testi. �Q.L 1i�
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES W EFFECT ON TH6S DATE DATE
72-02 (Aft. Aie5)
TMS TES: WAS PERFORMED W
DEPARTMENT of HEALTH '& HUMAN sEFrnces
825 'L' Street. AnChorage. Alaska 99502-0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Beraaren DATE
LEGAL DEscR)PnON: The Villages Sub. Township. Range. Sectiorc
OE -TN OL
SLOPE
1
• � e
2
D
u
3
n
G
•
c=W
0
. 4•
5
0 •
6
v:•Q
bio
7
9
TESTHOLE NO. 5
16
17
18
19
20
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCDuNTEREDt No
IF YES AT WHAT
DEPTM
BnM mN ne cw 8/10 9f
14mrog7 ��
•��IENGt�NEERS `SEAL.
1.
SITE
Riding Daa Ner Tim. Dam m NR
Ti�W-c Drop
I
I
I
. I
I I I
I I I
I I
1 1
uN
PERC.:lATION RATE Imvwtes,v+al) PEAL MOLE DIAMETER
TEST RUN BETWEEN ! /Z' FT AND Z •/L FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEDer. M- AndPrSnn I ZK'-d�Ck...4—=XTIFY THA- THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE:��� S
72-006 III".
MunidpaGty of Anchorage
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH '& HUMAN SERVICES
8Z5 V Street. Anchorage, Alaska 99SM-06W
SOILS LOG —PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Beraaren DATE
LEGAL DESCRIPnoN: The Villages Sub. Townshic. Rance. SeCinrr
1
a
OL
� �
o
2
.40
.
3
40 ..
I 6101,
. c
TESTHOLE NO. 6
4
' t
Cm
I Z•
w 4i rr%4
5
t.v
31/1L 64
A
Sa.,ac
6
p' r
I I
is Y,
744Z,
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
a
SLOPE
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
IF YES. AT WHAT
DEPTH?
GeommwNo
? None Oat 8/10 9E
Ya®rmg_L
.,jEHGINEERS SEAL)
IT
. .L, �.ti •M ''
..... _ ' ..• r n
SITE
Reding OmWavw I 'nm
'nm
I
- p o0
.40
zah» I
I 6101,
I /0
1 1
3 VL 4-
.L=
7- :7
I Z•
1 :JT
I 10
5'a 'a l
31/1L 64
I
1 I
1
I I
20 3 N
PERCOLATION RATE -7 PERC MOLE DIAMETER S
TEST RUN BETWEEN Z 1IL FT AND 3 I/L FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEDBr. M. Anderann I u/I` d F,4L IFY THAT THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES W EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE: -
72 -OW (Rev. Ales)
' �1Ei+lGI�N��SSEiW),
oePaaTnnErir nkipaft �.ndiar" rl sERvlces
8251.' Street. Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Beragren DATE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Villages Sub. Towrdh47, Range. Section:
,s Lem L
1
TESTHOLE NO. 7
S
P
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
IF YES, AT WHAT
DEPTH?
DCO aW= � a 8/10 9
>I .? bw LE —
R-dW4
Dao Gras
11741"1
11741"1
Net
Tun.
Depth to
Waar
Not
Drop
3:05
—
3. slr.
3
lb,"
4-
sy
I
6
6-
1 S YL 1
ff/g"
7:/
IW 4I.L • I
7
7-
:2L
S
I 5J .r
Z. L.r
I
�±
10
10.
11
12-
2131416
13-
14-
16.
71819 17-
Is -
19 -4
TESTHOLE NO. 7
S
P
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? No
IF YES, AT WHAT
DEPTH?
DCO aW= � a 8/10 9
>I .? bw LE —
R-dW4
Dao Gras
11741"1
11741"1
Net
Tun.
Depth to
Waar
Not
Drop
3:05
—
3. slr.
lb,"
Z 1"
sy
I
S
1 S YL 1
ff/g"
7:/
IW 4I.L • I
*&
:2L
S
I 5J .r
Z. L.r
I
I
20 IL._ll PERCOLATION MTE (mnurasru¢nI PERC HOLE DIMAETEA
. r
TEST RUN BETWEEN L IL FT AND 3 IL FT
couMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMEDBY•. M- AndPrson Iwo-�"-L—J—C'MIFY THA3S THIS TEWAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES IN EFFECT ON THIS DATE DATE - 8r (1 / Q 6
72 -OW (Per. 4a5)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH S HUMAN SERVICES
6251' Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99502-0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Ber4Cren DATE
LEGALDEscR1PnON: The Villages Sub. Township. Range.Sertion:
� L
SQ
TESTHOLE NO. 8
12
13-
14-
is-
16 -
'17
3141516T7
18-
19-
20-1
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED?
IF YM AT WHAT
DEPMt
S
L
O
P
E
Dana A&W bw 8/10/98
R+.dy I Des ( Tar ( Time
I
DEE
>z1 I S z. I 1:-im
1 13:NS I S
I 5" I
LCL•
1 13: SD 1
1 7Yt"
•l
1 r I
I t •I
L•/
I I
I I
1 1
I I
I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I
JPEACClAMON PATE Z IrtwunweKr+) PERC NOL DIAMETER B 4
TEST RUN BETWEEN .. FT AND 3 VL FT
C,CMMEHTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMED BY: M- Anderton I� """—C3YTIFY THA THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE wrrm AL' r:ATE AND MUNICPAL GUIDE3NES W EFFEC' ON THtS DATE DA: E:
72-cCL (Rev. APS) .
� G Man�apaGb of AneAorsp�
DEPARTMENT z•:; . ��
'T OF HEALTH b HUMAN SERVICES
825'L• St -ftp Anchors
• 9e. Alaska 94=-0G50 .
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Beraaren ,�Z.�'�., •" p�
DATE PERFORMk�'k�; _�S%ZLg$ • .
LEGAL Of! fiIPTION: The Villages Sub. TownsA;aRange Seaiorc •�`1' 'ti`�`a�`F-
: n SLOPE SITE PLAN
7 -
2
4
5
6
TESTHOLE NO. 9
5w
BctiROCa_ •- —
j
WAS GROUND WATER
ENC7UNTERPD?
IF YES. ATwHAT'
DEPTH?
am a ww Abe
y„w,*? None Opt 8/10 9E
4 I D.e I m I T'
V-/ t t. I 'T n I I
I I
D.w
s3a • I
Z
I I •I:r S I -
„ I
u. I S
S ''t
L y
I 1
I 1
I I
1 I
I
I I
� f PERCrLATION RATE L Mwkmvom) PERC HOLE D"ErM $ ,•
TES' RUN BETWEEN W/L F, AND T L FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to'Test
PERFORMEDBT_ U _And peon
FY THAT TEST WAS POIFORMEO IN
ACCORDANCE WTM AL: SATE AND UUm=pAL GUIDMXaM INEFFECT ON THS DATE DATE; •— S/// 96
72 -OM (RN• 4,r3)
Munk4mlity of Anclror"t
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH d HUMAN SERVICES
MS -L:- Street Anchorage- Alaska 99502.06W
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Sercaren DACE
L= -GAL nESCRIPnoN: The Villages Sub. TownsWc. Range- Sectio¢
SLOPE
z
9
70
11
22
I3
TESTEOLE NO. 10
16
17
78
I9
20
WAS GROUND WATER
ENO MUCEREOT N� o
IF TES AT WHAT
D89W
BM s tray Acer
auwW None mac 8/1019f
PER=LAMON PATE L 1 ' $ ~
Imo) vERc Hol< DIAMETER
TEST RUN BMMM4O'Tes% Yl -FT AND 3 Yr- FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior tt.
PERFORMEDBT. M_ AndPreor. I 'rP-•r(�.eAlC.� ' ,
/THKM TES WAS PERFORMED W
AG%ORDANC'c WITH ALL
..ATE AND MUMMPAL GL7DELIIJES W EFF'cC ON THIS DATE. DATE; • SII "I'le
72-00a IRw. AMS)
2-
4
4
.,
5
z
9
70
11
22
I3
TESTEOLE NO. 10
16
17
78
I9
20
WAS GROUND WATER
ENO MUCEREOT N� o
IF TES AT WHAT
D89W
BM s tray Acer
auwW None mac 8/1019f
PER=LAMON PATE L 1 ' $ ~
Imo) vERc Hol< DIAMETER
TEST RUN BMMM4O'Tes% Yl -FT AND 3 Yr- FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior tt.
PERFORMEDBT. M_ AndPreor. I 'rP-•r(�.eAlC.� ' ,
/THKM TES WAS PERFORMED W
AG%ORDANC'c WITH ALL
..ATE AND MUMMPAL GL7DELIIJES W EFF'cC ON THIS DATE. DATE; • SII "I'le
72-00a IRw. AMS)
& HUMIlun�of e
DEPARTMENT OFF HEALTH
LTF! b HUMAN SERVICES
825'L' Street. AnchoraM Ataska 99502-0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR. John Berccren •(
• DATE ►ERFORI
LEGAL DES.^RIPITON: The Villages Sub. Township. Range. Section: .
7
2-
4-
7-
12 47
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
TESTHOLE N0. 11
S w
a
WAS GROUND WATER
�Icn,.rraae,»
,r.
AAI_)
PERFORMED
--
mm
)FYES.ATWNAT
DEPTH?
Dwm a Waw Ufa
r7 None
s
►
E
mIc 8/90 98
I I I
I I I I I
R..eky I D�
I Ti•r ( Tiiw to I D o
I
I
I
1 I 1
I I I I
I
I I I I
1
1 1
I
I I I
I -
• I
1 I 1
I I
20-{ �i
UPERCOLATION ATE 1am) P6iC HOLE DIA►1
METER
TET RUN 8Ef WEEN F7 AND �' FT
caMMEN-m Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORYEDer M. Anderson 14"E
FY THATTHIS TES WAS PERFORMED W
Ac=RDANOE W(TN ALL SATE AND NUNICPAL G=E1NE5 01 EFF—c= ON THIS DATE, DATE •—�J! ISI E+
7Z�CtE (R.v, uG5)
2-11
Municipardy at Aneho"
1\E1
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3 HUMAN SERVICES � - _• • = '.'
82S 'L' Street. Anchorage. Alaska 99502-0650
SOILS LOG — PERCOLATION TEST
PERFORMED FOR: John Ber4gren' • MI�•.� • f ` '+
DATE PERFORMED.:^: 8 / 2 / 98. • � �;.'',�"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Villages Sub. Township, Range. Section: tZ `':`••' •••=`'r"
IE�i'f•
OL -
2 L_2
3-
4-
6-
7 4 6 7 a {
9 /rr
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
5119
TESTHOLE NO. 12
.5Li
6o u t b IcLS
8aTrx-0CjL-
WAS GROUND WATER
ENCOUNTERED? NO
IF YES. AT WHAT
DEPTH?
ceme to war 1Wr
mmmrm? None pm 8/10/9£
20 N
PERCOLATION RATE G I fm utcvma+) PERO HOLE DIAMETER a
TEST RUN BETWEEN 3 •1/ s" FT AND -11L-FT
COMMENTS Test Cavity Presoaked Prior to Test.
PERFORMED Br M- Anderson 1 VL -4{ TIFY THAT IsE57pWAS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALLS. ATE ANO MUNICIPAL GUIDELINES W EFFECT ON THIS GATE DATE - C59 °y
7'2-= (Rev. 4185) .
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TERRASAT, INC.
1413 W. 31" Avenue
ANCHORAGE, AK 99503
TO: �� YY\ \ (`OSS DATE:
ATTN:
RE:
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
❑ Attached
❑ Discs
❑ Under Separate Cover via
❑ Report ❑ Letter ❑ Samples
(907) 344-9370
FAX: 344-1490
is-aO_y i
❑ Prints ❑ Photos ❑Other
DESCRIPTION
Wei
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOR':
❑ For approval
Jor your use
❑ As requested
❑ Approved as submitted
❑ Approved as noted
❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review/comment ❑
REMARKS:
COPY TO:
L:Ubrnubfficc\trans(ct. doc
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
C7.