HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTONEVIEW LT 1
nchora ¢
P.O. BOX 196650
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650
(907) 264-4111
TONY KNOWLES,
MA YOR
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
June 1, 1987
Hugh Bevan, P.E.
Bevan Engineering
P. O. Box 112852
Anchorage, Alaska 99511
Subject: Previously Granted Lot Line Waiver by Stephen Morris
for Lot 1 Stoneview Subdivision
Dear Mro Bevan:
The above mentioned lot line waiver that was approved May 22,
1987 is still in effect. Our records will show that the septic
system for the lot is entirely within the lot line without the
excess trench being removed.
This waiver applies to this existing septic leach field onlyo
Any future upgrade will require another waiver from D.H.H.S.
Si~ncerely,
Daniel J. h
Civil Engineer
On-Site Services
cc: Gus Andress, P.E.
On-Site Services/Water Quality Project Manager
- I
' BEVAN ENGINEERING
P.O. Box 112852
Anchorage. AK 99511
(907) $22-13B.t
Hun :i. c :L pa:L i 'Ly o.F P, nc:hor age
Depar"L:men~ o¥ Hea].th & Environmental
825 "1..,." Stree'[:
Anchorage, Alaska 995¢1
MUNICIPALITY OF ANiD40~
DEPT. OF HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTDDIlON
Protection JUN 1 987
RECEI EI
Re :: D:L! 1 & L.a3uanne S'bom% Fiealth ~Ltthol-':L ty #¢pp! iE:at':~.
L. ot 1 Stoneview S_~DclJv:i. sJ, on
Gent:Lemen r,
Dur:Lng the in:L'b:Lal excavation .For" the proposed 5 -t:oc;'f: cut-bacl< of the
referenced sept. ic drain¥ield it ~as discover"ed 1:hat 'Lhe south s'bandpipe was not
ver"~::Lcs~][. The s'bandpipe had been .Forced 'Eo the ~¢~est by so:L! pressure,,
SL.~3sequer'tt i::alc::L(].ations showed th~'~t a sl"iJ, ft of only ¢.85 lee't: ~,~ot.z].d have
br'oL.t~.]ht tJ'lE~ 8i'l'b:i.l'"e siiystem OFitO L.o'~;
! belJ. eve the _septic drairi,:.~ge 't:rench .For Lot I lies en'Lirely ori Lo't: 'J.,. MOA has
......,-'~:*,-'.'*,-'"'l,,6.,~L, ¢ approved a lot line waiver Tclr this system.
repa:i.r of al! s'[:ar'ldl3ipes :in the system I in.jetted
~j~l.L,..in.., of clear' ~'~a't. er :in(:.o '~.he ~= '-'," tan[:: ~;tarldpJ. p(a,
:i.n t. he system,,
.,. dt~. ,.,. ,.~.=-.-. tel.:jar"cling 'Li't£~ c:or'i-formar/c:,'~e cl-~ this svEits~nl have been
]: be:L:Leve al'~ ......... '
~l~= ........ ,-=,'"6. c.1,,- · F:'!ease contac'L me :L.F ]: can help ¢~:. i]edi'Le, the HAA on J ]. :, l:H"ciperty-
.., ',, :' '~ ',,"' =, (ph ,J.,~z.- 1...~8.-,
E /.,..1 ? w=
BEVAN ENGINEERING
P.O. 8ox 112852
Anchorage, AK 9951I
(9O7) 522-13~3
!'.'~ :..,, y 18 1987
].o'[: !ine~ I:.~T ].o'h :i.. The .,~:o].lowing da'l':a and a'htache~cl drawings r-el:U"es[~n'[: OLU'" .EOF' a lot: line waivEm',,
i) ~iot:h ].ots ]. aFid 2 o~: EitoneviE~w ~subdivision ar'e OWl"llE~d by Bill
2) Nr. Stori[~ (a~ owneEr" of lot 2) has rio ol~.jec'Lion t:hat a. I~Or'~:ior~ of the
dF'airr~ielcl or'i L.o'E ! pr'o'Er'udes~ int:o the lief Eoo'E lo'L line se~: bacl< for' lc)t:
· i::o ~!ff'ior"t. en t:.l"i~ dr-ainEi(alcl on !o'E 1,, Th:is ~Eihor'E(~,riing o"f al:ipr-ox:Emat:ceZy 5 .t:eet:
~i].]. !:)F'ir'Ig 'l:.h~, ent:Erety o~ the ch'-ail'lEiE:e].d ori'l:o ].o'L
F:':L.,.=_eas'.e c:ont:ac:'~..'ne if 3: can c::!.ar':i4'y ch ....... t ..... La.Lo (ph ._x~...~.
I-!L~'gh IR. Beva,,n I:'. E.
~s~uil'~ Sur~ey
I hereby ~rtify that I have surveyed Lo~
Stoneview Sub~i~iiia~ ~n~grage ~, Alaska t
~d' that the i~rovemen~.'~a~e~B. ~e::within'
the prop~ty lines anff dm not o~rlap ~
en~o~h on prope~ lying 3dj~ce~t there~et
that no: improv-eme'nts on property l~ing
adjacent: thereto encroac~~ on ~e p~emi~s
.uestion~ ~d that there' are. no roadways,
{ransmis~on lines, or othe. visible' .asement~
on said property,' except as. shown hereon.
FLATTOP TECHNICAL SERVICES
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING · ENERGY CONSERVATION &ANALYS[$
TIIEODORE F. MOORE. P.E. 14530 ECHO ST.
PIt: [9071 345-1355 ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99516
June [5, 1987
Warren Horowitz
12201 Shenandoah Rd.
Anchorage, AK 99516
Dear Mr. Horowitz:
Per your request I have inspected the wastewater disposal
system serving the residence you propose to purchase on Lot 1 of
Stonev,ew S/D, located at 11411 Snowline Drive. I also have
reviewed the available information concerning the system ar the
Municipal Health Department, have discussed with Mr. Bevan the
test procedures he used in determining the system's adequacy and
verify,ng it's compliance with local codes, and have discussed my
findings with Mr. Morris of the Health Department both at his
office and on the site.
The wastewater disposal system was installed in November of
1981. According to Eugene Fisher's inspectxon reporr the system
consists fo a 1500 gallon septic tank followed by 52 lineal reef
of soil absorption trench containing 96 inches of gravel and
having 4 feet of cover over the distribution pipe. Two cleanout
pipes are shown on the septic tank and one at each end of the
trench. The inspection report indicates that the nearest lot
line is 90 feet from the trench and that a stream is 150 feet
from the trench.
On his Health Authority Approval checklist, Mr. Bevan noted
that the standpipe at the south end of the trench was 0.5 feet ~
from the west property line. After "modifications" of this
standpipe by the property owner, Mr. Bevan reported to the
Municipality that the standpipe had previously been bent away
from vertical, and that he now believes that the trench is
entirely on lot 1.
On June 13, at your request, I made some measurements of the
standpipes. The waste line at the foundation cleanout is a
little over 10 feet below the relatively flat ground level
surrounding the house. Thus, rather than having 4 feet of cover
as noted on the plans, the wastewater distribution pipes have a
minimum of at least 10 feet of cover. Mr. Bevan reported that
prior to the aforementioned "modifications" of the south stand-
pipe, he had observed a total depth in that pipe of approximately
15 feet below ground level, indicating that the pipe penetrated
at least part way down into the sewer rock.
On June 13, the "modified" standpipe extended to only a
little over 9 feet below ground level, indicating to me tbat it
terminated one or more feet above the level of the sewer rock and
horizontal distribution pipes. The north standpipe extended to a
similar depth. Ia order to further assess the status of the
"modified" standpipe, on Juae 15 I ran water into it with a bose
aud discovered 'that 19 gallons was sufficient to fill it to a
broke, joint just below ground level. The water level' receded
very slowly once I stopped adding water. Based on the above, I
would have to conclude that the "modified" standpipe is sot
connected in auy way to the soil absorption system. Thus, its
position'is irrelevant to a determination of the location of the
subsarface soil absorption system, and it is completely use]ess
for adequacy testiag purposes. I wou]d be surprised if the
DHHS would knowingly condone this type of subterfage.
Without a monitor tube extending to the bottom of the gravel
it is difficult for anyone to conduct a meaningful adequacy test
of the system. By adding a sudden dose of 700 gallons to the
septic tank, as Mr. Bevan did, one is able to determine that
there is that much available empty space in the sewer rock, but
one cannot determine the absorption rate. I think the instal-
lation of a functioning monitor tube should have beea required.
Only when you pointed out that there was in fact a stream
flowing within 100 fe&t directly downhill from the septic system,
were arrangements made to relocate the stream outside t.he
protective radius. This work was done o. June 14, and was
successful in getting approximately 90% of the stream flow into
the new channel. Based on my previous understanding of Health
Department regulations, I would assume that even the remaining
flow would require a formal waiver of the required 100 foot
separation between wastewater disposal systems and surface water.
If such a waiver were granted now, you could have some degree of
confidence that it would still be valid were you to need Health
Authority Approval of the system in the future.
I should point out that the soils in which the system is
constructed are near ideal for on-site wastewater disposal, and
that I saw no evidence of failure of the system. According to
the as-built, it was originally sized for at le. ast five bedrooms,
and if so, that provides an added factor of safety. Should the
system fail, there does appear to be ample space in the southern
portion of the lot for construction ~f a replacement.
For ~our own protection,' I do think you should formally
notify the Health Department of the abovementioned discrepencies,
to ensure that their approval is not based on erroneous
information which you might have in the future.
to pay to correct
Sincerely,
Ted ~oore,
Anchorage
P.O. BOX 196650
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650
(907) 264-4111
TONY KNOWLES,
MAYOR
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
June 17, 1987
Hugh Bevan, P.E.
Bevan Engineering
P.O. Box 112852
Anchorage, Alaska 99511
Subject: Lot 1 Stoneview Subdivision, Health Authority Approval
Dear Mr. Bevan:
This Department has received an independent evaluation of the
septic system on the subject lot by way of a letter written by
Ted Moore, P.E. to Mr. Warren Horowitz. A copy of this letter
is attached. Mr. Moore has brought up a number of
discrepancies regarding the septic system that must be resolved
before a Health Authority Approval can be issued for the
property. I have itemized some of the points brought out in
Moore's letter below.
Based on the elevation of the wasteline at the foundation
cleanout, Moore determined that the drainfield standpipes
terminated at a level above the gravel in the drainfield.
The results of any adequacy test performed without monitor
tubes are questionable unless it can be established that
the storage capacity of the rock-filled trench has been
exhausted. The meaningfulness of an adequacy test
conducted by introducing 700 gallons of water into an
absorption field without monitor tubes is questionable.
Moore contends that only ninety percent of the stream flow
was rerouted into the new channel and that the remaining
flow should require a formal waiver.
As for item 3 above, I believe that the stream setback problem
has been substantially resolved and a formal waiver is not
necessary. Unless the discrepancies brought up in items 1 and
2 can be addressed by way of explanation this department will
require that at least one four inch monitor tube be installed
at one end of the trench. This monitor tube should be attached
to the perforated drainfield piping with a sweep. A minimum of
three feet of perforated pipe should extend into the gravel
below this sweep connection.
After the installation' Of the ~onitor tube another adequacy
test should be performed. The results of this adequacy test
must be submitted to this department.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please give me
a call. I realize that you have not had the opportunity to
speak to the discrepancies brought up in this letter.
Sincerely,
S ephen S. Morris
Civil Engineer
On-site Services
cc
Gus Andress, P.E.
Manager, On-site and Water Quality Programs
Virginia Johnson, Fortune Properties
Barbara Lyon, Marston Real Estate
Bill Stone
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE MEMORANDUM
June 19, 1987
File, Lot 1 Stoneview S/D
Stephen S. Morris, civil Engineer DHHS
100 foot separation requirement between stream and
drainfield.
A portion of a small stream on Lot 2 of Stoneview S/D was
rerouted in order to meet the required 100 foot setback to the
drainfield on the subject lot. The horizontal separation
between the original stream channel and the closest portion of
the septic drainfield on Lot 1 was approximately 80 feet. The
major portion of the flow in this stream was rechannelled to a
distance in excess of the 100 foot requirement.
On June 15, 1987 I inspected this stream diversion. It appeared
that approximately 90 percent of the stream had been routed into
the new channel 100 feet away from the drainfield. It is my
opinion that the stream setback problem has been substantially
resolved and that a waiver is not required for the small surface
water flow that remains in the old stream channel. If the
stream were to revert back to its original channel it is my
opinion that there is little if any possibility of contamination
of this stream due to its proximity to the drainfield.
1
/=~w'e~/ ~3~ ' 2~"~
A's~uil t: Survey'
Stonevie~ Subdi~i:si:on~ : g ~
and: that the, imDrovemen~ t!te, reoD~ a.t:=Lwith~n'
the property lines and' d'o: not ov~ria~~ or'
enc'roac~' on ro err 1 ing adjacent thereto-,
P P Y Y
that no~ improvements on property' lying
a~3acent~ thereto encroach~ on ~he p~em~s,es, ~n
question,, and that there, ar~ no r~adways-:,
transmisli'on lines,, or other visible'
on sa~d properW: excep~ as~ shoun hereon.
: ' ~ane 2, 1987
C,'.b/. > "-
~[~,~ MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAl. PROTECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION
825 L Street- Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Telephone 264-4720
ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM AND/OR WELL INSPECTION REPORT
NAME D & B General, Inc, / William Stone PHONE ~NEW
~9-6965 ~ UPGRADE
~AILING ADDRESS
P,O. Box 10-1~9 Anchor~e, Al~sk~ 99511
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NE~ SE~ SE~ NW~ Section 24, T12N, RDW, S.M.
LOCATION NO. OF BEDROOMS
/Snowline ~d llSth
~ ~ DISTANCE TO: N/A 811171
~ E Manufacturer Material No, of compartments
~ < Stl 2
~ ~ biq, capacity in gallons ~OO~ Inside length Width Liquid depth
~00 IF HOMEMADE:
, ~ Well Dwelling PERMIT
O ~ ~ Manufacturer Material Liquid capacity in gallons
~ Well Foundation Nearest lot line PERMIT NO.811171
~ DISTANCE TO: ~/A ~/A Trenc~iOth ~0'
~ No. of lines Lengt~f,each llne Total leah, of lines Distance between lines
1 inches
~ Top of tile to finish grade Material beneath tile Total effective absorption area
~ 4' ~ 96inches 832 sq .ft,
Length Width Depth PERMIT NO.
~ P Type of crib Crib diameter Crib depth Total effective absorption area
~ Well Building foundation Nearest lot line
e DISTANCE TO:
~ Class Depth Driller Distance to lot Hne PERMIT NO,
~ Building foundation Sewer line Septic tank Absorption area(s)
~ DISTANCE TO:
OTHER i I ~ +~
PIPE MATERIALS
SOILTESTRATING i2~ sq,ft,/b~m Z '/~ ~J
D & B General
REMARKS .~Z ~ ~ /
APPROVED 11~1/81 LEGAL
~F PELS
72-013 (Rev. 3/78)
F'ERMX T N'3
F4F'F'L. I CFINT
LOC:PaT i ON
_EGFIL
'±0890EI S(]UP, RE FEET
'T"¢PE ElF SOIL. HE,_,U.. I.[UI'~ =,T=,TEfl IS: TRENCH
i"!F!::.:;ZMUH NIJrlE,,_F. Er:' EEDRuuft.:, = 5
=',uIL. RRTING '""~ rt,. 6[ ...... :i. Z5
< =,1.4 - ' "" "'' "~ --
THE F.:E~UIREE:, :,I~.E OF TFIE
HE,=,LIRF T ! U!', '- '
THE LENGTH D):i'"IENSIOI",! I~ THE LENGTH ,::IN FEET') OF THE TRENCH OR DRFIINFIELD.
']"FIE DEPTH OF F! TRENCH OF,: PIT I~ THE D!STRI'.,!CE BETHEEN THE SURFRCE OF THE
GROUND FIND THE BOTTOH OF THE EXCFt',/'RTtON (Il'.,! FEET).
THERE IS NO SET H-TDTH FOR TRENCHES.
THE GRFI'v'EL DEPTH II] THE M-TI',gIHUM DEPTH (."iF GRWv'EL BETHEEN THE OUTFFILI.,, PIPE
.FIND THE: BCITTOf'! OF' T'HE EXCR'v'RTION (IN FEET':).
PERMIT RF'F'L-T CFIN'F HFIS THE RE=,F UN=,-TE,.[L I'T'¢ "FEi l NF'ORM TH II; r:,EF'FffRTMENT DURING THE
IN=,THLLPTILN ihL, FE_.] -TLN_ OF' RN? IdELLS FIDJ'F!CENT TO FFII.:, F'RZPERT'¢ FINE) '['FIE
NUHBER OF !~.~.=,IL.,Eh!UE=, T'HRT' TFIE 14ELL dill
BRL':KF-TLLING r]F' FIN'¢ =,~=,T-~.I, HITHOUT FINFtL IN~;PEE:T-TCIN RND RPF'Rr",,,'Ftt E:'¢ TH-TS
DEPFtRTHENT I.,.t-TLL BE _':UE:JFZL'T "FO PROSECUTION.
MINIMUM DIE;TFINCE 8ETi4EEN F:! k!ELL FINE..', RN'¢ ON-SITE SEHRGE D!SPOSFIL S'¢~;TEH II;
±00 FEE'[' FOR: R PRIVFITE !4ELL OR t50 TO 200 FEET FROM B PUBLIC WELL DEPENDING
UPON THE 'T',JPE OF' PLIBLIC HEL.L.
t'i]'NIl',!Ut"l D!S'T'RNCE F'ROH R PRIVFtT'E HELL. TO f:l PRIVRTE ~3E!,,.IER LINE: IS .'.25 FEET FIND
'TO R E:OHHUN-TT~-' SEHER LINE _TS 75 FEET,
O]"HER REQUIREMENTS MR'¢ RF'PL.'). SPECIFICRTIONS RN[." CONSTRUCTION DIRGRFfl"IE: RRE
R',,,'R~LRBL. E 'TO INSURE PROPER -TNSTRLLRTION.
I C:ERTIF'~' THRT
:L: I F!M FRMIL. IBR H!TH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE SENERS FINE:) HELLE; RS SET
FBRTH B'¢ THE MUN!CIPRLtTY OF RNCHORRGE.
2: t H:[LL INSTRLL THE S'¢ST'EM IN RCCORDRNCE H-TT'H THE CODES.
2: I UNDERSTF!ND 'T'HRT THE ON-.SITE ~;EHER %'¢STEM f'lRk' REQUIRE ENLRRGEMENT IF THE
REE;IDENCE Ii; REI"!ODELED TO INCLLIDE MBRE THRN 5 BEDROOMS.
'v'4. 0
SOILS LOG
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
825 L, Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 264-4720
SOILS LOG - PERCOLATION TEST
[] PERCOLATION
TEST
PERFORMED FOR: D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
DATEPEREORMED=
SLOPE SITE PLAN
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20¸
COMMENTS ~ ,~,~
PERFORMED BY:
WAS GROUND WATER ~S
ENCOUNTERED? ~) O
P
E
IF ~ES, AT WHAT
DEPTH?
Reading Date Gross Net Depth to Net
Time Time Water Drop
PERCOLATION RATE
TEST RUN BETWEEN
C~oo ~ E:,~ .~eF~
CERTIFIED BY:
FT AND
72-008 (6/79)
PERMIT NO.
APPLICANT
LOCATION
LEGAL
BILL J STONE
Ti2NR}W S 24
PO BOX f0-1864 99511
LOT SIZE
~44-Z514
999999 SQUARE FEET
MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN A WELL AND ANY ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS
t00 FEET FOR A PRIVATE WELL OR 150 TO 200 FEET FROM R PUBLIC WELL DEPENDING
UPON THE TYPE OF PUBLIC WELL.
MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM R PRIVATE WELL TO R PRIVATE SEWER LINE IS 25 FEET AND
TO A COMMUNITY SEWER LINE IS 75 FEET.
WELL LOGS ARE REQUIRED AND MUST BE RETURNED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN ZO DAYS
OF THE WELL COMPLETION.
OTHER REQUIREMENTS MAY APPLY. SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAMS ARE
AVAILABLE TO INSURE PROPER INSTALLATION.
F'ER~'I T T E ::-:;F' I RES [)ECEMBER ~l.. i~82
I
t:
FORTH BY THE MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE.
2: I WILL INSTALL THE SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODES.
'IGNED ' t~i t
FIF'PLICANT:BILL J STONE
CERTIFY THAT
I RM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE SEWERS AND WELLS RS SET
V4. 0
(907) 243-2282
KEN JOHNSON
KI;N'S COMPANY
WATER WELL DRILLING
PUMP SALES & SERVICE
30 YEARS ALASKA DRILLING
3163 LINDEN DRIVE
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99502
October 6, 1982
Bill Stone
S & S Contracting
Anchorage, J~laska
Re; Lot i Stoneview Subd.
WATER WELL LOG
0 ft to 2 ft
2 ft to 2i-6 ft
21-6 to 28 ft
24 ft to 25 ft
25 ft to 27 ft
27 ft to 3~ ft
31 ft to 75 ft
75 ft to 95 ft
95 ft to 100 ft
100 ft to ~0~ ft
108 ft to ~lO ft
110 ft to 113 ft
Brown silt
Med. gravel & brown silt
Same,..weeps
Clean I,ied. gray. Water bearing 2½ gpm, 6'
l~ed. sand & gravel .. weeps..
Med. grav.& brown silt ( dry ) ( tight )
Brown silt & gray. ( Course )
Course gray. & gray silt ( tight )
Fractured slab rock & brown silt
Same.. ¥/eeps..
Brown silt & fine fractured rock ( open Hi.
Weeps.. bails dry,dirty..
Clean Med. & course fractured rock.. H20 ..
( overburden with brn silt binder )
35 ft. head
Static 78 ft.
Test pumped 1 hr. at 3 Gpm..
Well Yields 2 GPM
Permenant pump set at/~-6 ft. ( T0C )
Total depth 113 (TOC)
hd
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
DEPT O~ HT'LTi ,z
ENVIRONM..'I',;A-; .,C.), ~CTION
1982
RECE!V_ED
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
Department of Health & Human Services
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
343-4744
CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION FOR HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL OF
ON-SITE SEWER AND WATER FACILITY FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
Parcell. D.# ~)~,~.-'~Lo ~- ~.',~- NAA# ~\',~'~--Q'; ~(-~'l~'~'t~,
1. GENERAL INFORMATION (Must be completed prior to submittal)
(a) Legal Description (include lot, block, subdivision, section, township,~.acge)
(b) Property o~'r~'~.~..¢~¢~."~¢'¢6r~ ~¢,~,,,[~Telephone: (homg) ~/~-~Business
(c) Lending Institution ' "~.~'.O. Telephone ~ 2- 2 [~1
Mailing Address
(d) Real Estate Company and Agent ~"7~c/~ [.~(~-~-- -- f~ct-f'c¢~ ~...¢,~.~,0.¢,,~
Address
(e)
Telephone ~;~'~ .'~ -~-S-O 0
Mail the HAA to the following address: (or check here ~, if hold for pick up.)
List contact person and day phone number below:
2. TYPE OF RESIDENCE
Single-FamilyJZ~' Number of bedrooms
3. WATER SUPPLY
Individual Well ~ Community [] Public []
Note: If community well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environmental
Conservation attesting to th legality and status.
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
On-site ~ Public [] Community [] Holding Tank []
Note: If community well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environmental
Conservation attesting to the legality and statuE.
72-025 (Rev. 7/881 Page 1 of 2
5. ENGINEERING FIRM PROVIDING INSPECTIONS, TESTS, FILE SEARCH, DATA AND INFORMATION
As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I verify that my investigation of this
Health Authority Approval shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is safe,
functional and adequate for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein, I further verify that
based on the information obtained from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and
inspection, the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is in compliance with all Municipal and
State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect on the date of this inspection.
Name of Firm ~.4~., ~ .S, Telephone ~'¢~') '~ ~'¢-5-5~-$-~
Address /~/~, CVS', ~~,.~¢J;~'~ //CC. /~'~. ~ O'~(~,.,~
6. DHHS APPROVAL
Approved for -~ bedrooms by
Approved ,& Disapproved
Terms of Conditional Approval
Conditional
The Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issues Health Authority Approval
cerificated based only upon the representations given in paragraph 5 above by an independent professional engineer
registered in the State of Alaska. The DHHS does this as a courtesy to purchasers of homes and their lending
institutions in order to satisfy certain federal and state requirements. Employees of DHHS do not conduct inspections
or analyze data before a certificate is issued. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions
in the professional engineer's work.
72-025 (Rev 7/88)88ck Page 2 of 2
A. WELL DATA~
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE (MOA)
Health Authority Approval (HAA)
CHECKLIST - FEBRUARY 1984
343-4744
Legal Description: ~,~¢---~
If Al B, C, D.E.C. Approved (Y/N)
Date Completed /~-O~-~2~ : Yield ~,- ~,~-. ~r
Depth of Grouting
Pump Set At
Sanitary Seal on Casing~N).
Depression Around Wellhead (Y~)
; on Adjoining Lots
/,/'~O "~' ; On Adjoining Lots
To Nearest Public Sewer Cleanout/Manhole
Well Classification
Well Log Present C/N)
Total Depth ~/-? ~ Case'd to
Static Water Level ~"
Casing Height AlCove Ground [ '
Electrical Wiring in Conduit CN)
SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM WELL:
To Septic/Holding Tank on Lot
To Nearest Edge of Absorption Field on Lot
To Nearest Public Sewer Line
To Nearest Sewer Service Line on Lot
Water Sample Collected by (~'~.
Water Sample Test Results
Comments AJg~' ,~,~0 '7--~"7~
B. SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK DATA
Date Installed I]-I/- ~'! Size I~"00 ~a~.. No. of Compartments
Standpipes ((~/N) Air-tight Caps (~) Foundation Cleanout
DePression over Tank (Y~ Date Last Pumped O~-/~-e~
Pumping/Maintenance Contact on File (Y/N) ~ ;for
Holding Tan~R{~'¢~¢~[a~m (Y/N) ~/~ Temporary Holding Tank Permit (Y/N)
SEPARATI~EDt~T~NC~OM SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK:
T o W a t 8~;, y ~~ ~.~5~~-- -- ~ To Building Foundation
To ~ro~vt~ ~i~o /~ ~ To Di~o~l ~i~l~ _
To Wat~S~ /~ ~
moStrea~;~-~9~rainageCourse ~ ~r~ ~-(~/ .It~J
72-026 (Rev, 7/88) Front Page 1 of 2
ABSORPTION FIELD DATA
Soils Rating in Absorption Strata
Date Installed /J- //- 'i~
Width of Field -~"
Type of System Design
Length of Field .~-~ t ~-
Depth of Field /¢ ¢ ~
Gravel Bed Thickness ~' ' ~*'
Statndpipes Present(~N)
Date of Last Adequacy Test
Square Feet of Absortion Area ~'..~,
Depression over Field (Y/~
Results of Last Adequacy Test
SPPARATION DISTANCE FROM ABSORPTION FIELD:
To Water-Supply Well //d~d)
To Building Foundation /¢ '+-
Lot /~,./~ ;On Adjoining Lots
To Water Main/Service Line ~$~ ' '~
To C. utback (if present)
To Stream, Pond, Lake, or Major Drainage Course ~01']- ('~'~-
To Driveway! Parking. Area,
Comments ,~
To Property Line J'¢-- ~,."~" ~
To Existing or Abandoned System on
~'D.~I F T STATION
D~et~a I I e d _ Dimensions _
Pump On" Level at~'~.~ "Pump Off" Level at
High Water Alarm Level at~'""'"'"'--~ Vent (Y/N) _
Tested for ~ Pumping
~. _....._..~..~ Cycles during Adequacy Test.
Meets MOA Electrical Codes (Y/N)
Comments -"'"""~ ..~......~
**Check Permitted Bedroom Rating Against HAA Request**
I certify that I have checked, verified, or conformed to all MOA and HAA g
inspections?.
Company
Date
MOA No.
Waiver Fee: $
Receipt No,
Date of Payment
Amount:
72-026 (Rev, 7~88) Back
uideline.s~[~,,~fc.~t on the date of this
°
Date of Payment
Page 2 of 2
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
CERTrFICATE OF INSPECTION FOR HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL
OF ON-SITE SEWER AND WATER FACILITY
264-4744
Application Date ~'T~4n~z ¢.'8.., /9¢ 7
GENERAL INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL)
{a) Legal Description (include lot, block, subdivision, section, township, range)
Location (address or directions)
II YI I .~/~ ¢,c~..~1~,.¢ Dr',
(b) Property Owner 6fl.t _~/-o,~¢ Telephone: Home .N.A., Business
Mailing Address ~ ~ ~ ~en~
(c) Lending Institution ~ ~ ~(~'~d~Telephone
Mailing Address ~O O ~r~g~
(d) Real Estate Companyand Agent
Address 3000
Telephone .E'6
(e)
Mail the HAA to the followine address: or: Check here [~,, if hold for pick up.
List contact person and day phone number below.
TYPE OF RESIDENCE
Single-Family []
Number of Bedrooms
WATER SUPPLY
Individual Well [] Community [] Public []
Note: If community well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environ mental Conservation
attesting to the legality and status.
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
Onsite [] Public [] Community [] Holding Tank []
Note: If comm unity well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environmental Conservation
attesting to the legality and status.
Page 1 of 2 72-025 fRev 8/86~ Fronl
ENGINEERING FIRM PROVIDING INSPECTIONS, TESTS, FILE SEARCH, DATA AND INFORMATION
As certified by my seal affixed hereto and as of the validation date shown below, I verify that my investigation of this Health
Authority Approval shows that the on-site water supply and/or wastewater disposal system is safe, functional and adequate
for the number of bedrooms and type of structure indicated herein. [ further verify that based on the information obtained
from the Municipality of Anchorage files and from my investigation and inspection, the on-site water supply and/or
wastewater disposal system is in compliance with all Municipal and State codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect on
the date of this inspection. ¢*
Name of Firm I~lazt-~ 7-~¢,~;¢~.1' ~¢~-v'~r~' Telephone
Address I~ ~c~ ~fl.~ ~o~ ~/~
Date ~ / ~ g / ~
Engineer's Seal
DHHS APPROVAL
Approved for -/-J.t~-~ ~'~edrooms by ~
Approved ~ Disapproved
,,43- '~ Date
Conditional
Terms of Conditional Approval
CAUTION
The Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issues Health Authority Approval
certificates based only upon the representations given in paragraph 5 above by an independent professional engineer
registered in the State of Alaska. The DHHS does this as a coudesy to purchasers of homes and their lending institutions in
order to satisfy certain federal and state requirements. Employees of DHHS do not conduct inspections or analyze data
before a certificate is issued. The Municipality of Anchorage is not responsible for errors or omissions in the professional
engineer's work,
Page 2 of 2 72-025/Rev 8/86) Back
OP TECH ICA ,,
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING * ENERGY CONSERVATION & ANALYSIS
THEODORE F. MOORE, P.E.
PH: (907) 345-1355
M.O.A. Dep't. of Health
P.O. Box 6-650
Anchorage, AK 99519
Attn: Steve Morris
RE: Lot 1, Stoneview S/D
June 22, 1987
Human Services
14530 ECHO ST.
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99516
/~UNICIPAkITy OF ANCHORAGE!
DEPT. OF HEALTH &
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIOb[
J(,IN 2 3 1987
RF.C£1VED
Dear Mr. Morris:
I have now completed the requested repairs on, and
of, the wastewater disposal system serving the residence
of Stoneview S/D. Updated HAA forms are enclosed.
testing
on Lot 1
On June 20, under my supervision, Nick Stone excavated the
south end of the soil absorption trench and installed a combined
cleanout and monitoring tube. The monitor tube of perforated
F-810 pipe extends 3.5 feet below the horizontal distribution
pipe. The ASTM D-3034 riser extends 14.5 feet to a level approx-
imately 3 feet above ground surface. Although no formal survey
has been done, it would appear that the location is near to that
shown on the original lot survey.
Also on June 20 I retested the well yield. Near the maximum
drawdown of 111 feet below the top of the casing, the well yield
is 1.5 gpm, but this rate tapers off rapidly as the water level
climbs towards the static level of 78 feet. The well is equipped
with a Warrick low level pump protector, and there is a 120
gallon unpressurized storage tank in the house.
On June 22 I tested the adequacy of the wastewater disposal
system by running 3000 gallons of water into it through the
septic tank cleanout. Ail of the fluid disappeared from the
abovementioned monitor tube within 50 minutes after the water was
added. Based on this test, I determined that the absorption rate
is adequate for a 5 bedroom residence.
Please give me a call if you have any questions.
cc: Warren Horowitz
Sincerely,
Ted Moore, P.E.
MuNJCIPAUTY OF ANCHORAGE EPT OF HEALTH ~
D , __~ECI~It~.IOIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE (MOA)
~IRONM~NTAL
EN HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL (HAA)
tJg 2 ]987 CHECKLIST-264.4744FEBRUARY 1984
RECEIV[D Legal Description:
WELL DATA
Well Classification
Well Log Present (Y/N)
Total Depth I 1 3 ~
Static Wat'er Level
Casing Height Above Ground
Electrical Wiring in Conduit (Y/N)
Separation Distances from Well:
To Septic/Holding Tank on Lot · ["f ¢) '
To Nearest Edge of Absorption Field on Lot
P r-~b~J"~ If A, B, C, D.E.C. Approved (Y/N)
'r' Date Completed Io / o~/8~ Yield
Cased to ~ I~ 3' Depth of Grouting N,~.
?~' Pump Set At 111,5"'
Sanitary Seal on Casing (Y/N)
Depression Around Wellhead (Y/N)
To Nearest Public Sewer Line
Cleanout/Manhole
Water Sample Collected by
Water Sample Test Results
Comments
N
; On Adjoining Lots
I ~.~ ' ; On Adjoining Lots '~.
To Nearest Public Sewer
To Nearest Sewer Service Line on Lot /4,/~..
;Date ,-~/ 7 / ~'7
B. SEPTIC/HOLDING TANK DATA
Date Installed II/ft/~ ( Size 15"00~'~1 No, of Compartments
Standpipes(Y/N) ~"
Depression over Tank (Y/N)
Pumping/Maintenance Contract on File (Y/N)
Holding Tank High-Water Alarm (Y/N)
Separation Distances from Septic/Holding Tank:
To Water-Supply Well
To Property Line
To Water Main/Service Line N, A.
Course /0~ ~ 'b
N, R.
Foundation Cleanout (Y/N) 'r'
Date Last Pumped ~" / 8 Z/'¢ 7
; for /~,
Temporary Holding Tank Permit (Y/N)
To Building Foundation
To Disposal Field
To Stream, Pond, Lake, or Major Drainage
Page 1 of 2
72-026 IRev 8/861 Front
C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA
Soils Rating in Absorption Strata
Date Installed ii /it / Zll
Width of Field ~ t
Square Feet of Absorption Area
Depression over Field (Y/N)
Results of Last Adequacy Test
Separation Distance from Absorption Field:
To Water-Supply Well 189 t
To Building Foundation
Lot ~h/~,
I~.~ ¢'/Eo(r',~ Type of System Design _
Length of Field
Depth of Field
Gravel Bed Thickness
Standpipes Present (Y/N)
Date of Last Adequacy Test
To Properly Line
To Existing or Abandoned System on
; On Adjoining Lots ~
To Cutbank (if present)
To Water Main/Service Line /~1, ,4,
To Stream/Pond/Lake/or Major Drainage Course
To Driveway, Parking Area, or Vehicle Storage Area
Comments
LIFT STATION
Date Installed
Size in Gallons
"Pump On" Level at
High Water Alarm Level at
Tested for
Electrical Codes (Y/N)
Dimensions
Manhole/Access (Y/N)
"Pump Off" Level at
Vent (Y/N)
Pumping Cycles during Adequacy Test. Meets MOA
Comments
** Check Permitted Bedroom Rating Against HAA Request **
I certify that I have checked, verified, or conformed to all MOA and HAA guidelines in effect on the date of this inspection.
Signed' '~ ..~,~ Date
72-026 fRev 81861 Back
Engineer's Seal
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
CERTIFICATE OF iNSPECTION FOR HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL
OF ON-SITE SEWER AND WATER FACILITY
264-4744
Application Date
GENERAL INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL)
(a) Legal Description (include lot, block, subdivision, section, township, range)
Location (address or directions)
J. o
(b) Property Owner ~//~'~
Maifing Address
Icl Lendia~ ~nstitution
Mailing Address ' -
(d) Real Estate Company and Agent.
Telephone: Home --P~-'~ ~..¢'¢'-'¢ ~-~ Business
Telephone
Address
Telephone
(e) Mail the HAAto the followin~ address: or: Check hem¢'~, if hold for pick
List contact person and day phone number below.
TYPE OF RESIDENCE
Single-Family/~
Number of Bedrooms
WATER SUPPLY
Individual We[I,[~ Community [] Public []
Note: If community well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environmental Conservation
attesting to the legality and status.
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
Onsite,~ Public [] Community [] Holding Tank
Note: If community well system, must have written confirmation from the State Department of Environmental Conservation
attesting to the legality and status.
Page 1 of 2 72-025 fRev 8/861 Front
'~iJoa $,Jaou!Sua
leUO!SS@loJd eql u! suo!ss!wo Jo sJo~o Jol elq!suods@J lou s! oaeJoqouv lo tl!ledF)!un!AI eq/'panes! s! aleo!l!lJe9 e eJoleq
elep eZ~/leUe Jo suo!l~odsu! lonpuo3 lou op SHHQ lo sem/oldCU3 'sluowe4nbeJ elels pue leJepal u!elJe3 lis!les oi Jap Jo
u! suo!lnl!lsu! ~iu!puol ~!oqi pue sowoq to sJoseqoJad ol ~eepaoo e se e!MI seop SHH(] eqJ. 'e>tSel¥ to elelS eql u! paJ@ls!ae~
~aou!au@ leuo!sseloJd luapuodopu! ue ~q e^oqe 9 qde~SeJed u! ue^!¢ suoflelueseJda~ eM1 uodn ~llUO peseq s@~eo!lgieo
lO^ruddy llpoqlav qlleeH sones! (SHHGI saa!^~aS ueLunH pue MIIeoH 1o lueculJedoQ eae~OM~U¥ jo /il!led!o!unR aq/
NOI.LrlVO
ieAoJddv leUO!l!puoo Jo sbuJoJ_
leUO!l!puoD peAoJddes!Q '~" po^oJddv
/
'9
ouoqdalel .~ ~/~' WJ!$ 10 OWeN
-~ 'uo!loedsu!~ s!ql 1o elep oql
uo 19elle u! suo!~elnaa~ pue 'seou~u!p~o 'sepoo elelS pue led!a!un~ lie ql!~ aoUe!ldmo~ u! s! melslS lesods~p ~ele~e~se~
¢o/pue llddns ~ele~ el!s-uo eql 'uo!loedsu! pue UOll~8!lseAul ~ ~o~I pue Sel!l eaeJoq9uv ~o ll!led!o!un~ eql
pau!~lqo uo!lemJoju! eql uo peseq ~ql Il!Jo^ Jeq9n~ I 'u!aJaq palea!pu! e~nlOmlS ~o edll pue s~ompeq 1o Jeqmnu eq1
al~nbepe pub leUO!lOun~ 'ales s! melSlS lesOds!p Jal~aalSea ~o/pue llddns ~ele~ el!s-uo aq~ ~eql saoqs leaoJddv l~poqlnv
q~leeH s!ql ~o uo!~aUseaul lm ~ql ~luea I '~oleq u~o~s elep UO!lePllea eqllo se pue Ole~eq pax!lie I~es ~m lq peu!~eo sv
.g
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE (MOA)
HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL (HAA)
MUNICIPALITY OE ANCHO2AGE CHECKLIST - FEBRUARY 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 264-4744
/AY ! 8 ]987
WE''DATA RECEIVED
Well Classification
Well Log Present (Y/N)
Legal Description: .~'/~
If A, B, C, D.E.C. Approved (Y/N)
Date Completed .-/~- ~¢ '- ~'?'~ Yield
Total Depth //~ Cased to ~'~' ~'
Static Water Level ~ /-~./~'~"-' ,~".~/'
./
Depth of Grouting
Pump Set At
Sanitary Seal on Casing (Y/N) /4/
Depression Around Wellhead (Y/N)
Casing Height Above Ground
Electrical Wiring in Conduit (Y/N)
Separation Distances from Well:
To Septic/Holding Tank on Lot
; On Adjoining Lots
/-~ ~" ; On Adjoining Lots ~
To Nearest Public Sewer
To Nearest Sewer Service Line on
; Date ~5"- c.,~'-
To Nearest Edge of Absorption Field on Lot
To Nearest Public Sewer Line
Cleanout/Manhole - -
Water Sample Collected by
Water Sample Test Results ..wv ~"~
Comments
B~OLDING TANK DATA
Date I nstalled./~//' ~'/
Standpipes (Y/N)
Depression over Tank (Y/N)
Pumping/Maintenance Contract on File (Y/N)
Holding Tank High-Water Alarm (Y/N)
Separation Distances from Septic/Holding Tank:
To Water-Supply Well
To Property Line .,/~ ~
To Water Main/Service Line
Co urse" ' ' ~ ~ ~
Size /'~'~'~ No. of Compartments ~'
Air-tight Caps (Y/N) .,~ Foundation Cleanout (Y/N) /~/'
/~/ Date Last Pumped ~"~/~- ,~.~
; for
Temporary Holding Tank Permit (Y/N) '~
To Building Foundation /'~--~ ~
To Disposal Field 4~' ~J7g-
To Stream, Pond, Lake, or Major Drainage
Page19f2!~ ·
72-026 IRev 8/86~ Fronl
C. ABSORPTION FIELD DATA
Soils Rating in Absorption Strata
Date Installed
Width of Field
Square Feet of Absorption Area
Depression over Field (Y/N)
Results of Last Adequacy Test '~<~
Separation Distance from Absorption Field:
To Water-Supply Well
To Building Foundation
Lot
To Water Main/Service Line
To Stream/Pond/Lake/or Major Drainage Course
To Driveway, Parking Area, or Vehicle Storage Area
Type of System Design
Length of Field
Depth of Field ///~ ~
Gravel Bed Thickness ~
Standpipes Present (Y/N) _
Date of Last Adequacy Test
To Prope~y Line O,~
To Existing or Abandoned System on
; On Adjoining Lots /~ ~
To Cutbank (if present)
D. LIFT STATION
Date Installed
Size in Gallons
"Pump On" Level at
High Water Alarm'Level at
Tested for
Electrical Codes (Y/N)
Dimensions
Manhole/Access (Y/N)
"Pump Off" Level at
Vent (Y/N)
Pumping Cycles during Adequacy Test. Meets MOA
Comments
** Check Permitted Bedroom Rating Against HAA Request
I certify that I~aye che. gkc¢, verified, or conformed to all MO?. and HAA guidelines in effect on the date of this inspection.
Signe~~ Date
Company '~'~'~,"~ ~/' MOA No.
Date of Payment ~//~
Amount: $ /~
~O''~o~ ~'*.4OTH
Page 2 of 2
,~.-~
BEVAN ENGINEERING
P.O. Box tl2852
Anchorage, AK 9~$! 1
(907) 522-13~
May ].8~ 1987
Murl:Lc:ipality o'F Anchorage
Depar"tment of Health & Envirclnmentat
825 "L." ST~r~'~
Anchorage, Alaska c795~Z~1
Re ." Dill & Louanrle S'l:orx:'~ Heal'Eh Authority Apl3iication
L.o'~: ! S'~oneview S,._d:)d:i. vision
Gent :1. emel~
~,L,: ~,lg p ..... [tl-~ from ~pr'i! 15 to '.taw ':~. 1987 ....... ' .... -'~ "* ........
iriv.,~stic]atJ, ons, ,,~'1" 'F].o~ ana].ysi~, and ~).l]sorpt. ic}l"J 'Field testing persttant to
Health
I per-Fcir~med a v..,e)ii flow test and fOL'.r,~d the well i:lr-oduc'b~ol'~ to be 1.2 ~:la].].ons
'kook a water samples .for" coliform and i ..... r aL~ [ ana!ysi_,, arid the lab results
~= '~,"," day (gpd) This ~ ........ ~.d.., 'kine z['5~ gpd
absc)rbed at a r"ate of 45~+ .~1]..),,~ per ,, ="'"=";~ f= ,~ ..
removed was
A icrl.'.: !ilqe:~ wa:[v(:4r a[:.plic:,~'l::ion :[i.=i :in I:)ro~lr'ess-
'To my !-::nowledge I have ass-sembled a].]. o'F the .J.p,.Fc.w"matiol-~ r-eq,4ested orl t!-,,e HAA
AppI:i. cat.:[on and ..,h~.~..I..l~s'[:. I am ~.:iLlbmi'J:'lc:[rlcl th:L!B cla~a to you for you[ .....
F:'!ea~e corrEact, me i'f I can '~"ov]de any =~d'Lt~onal ±n.forma~,::i. or~. (ph .~x.~- ]....,8 ....
HAA AI--~p]. icatJ, on
HAA Ch e(::[.:: I i ~'t
N:i. trate ,Analysis
Sept i c: Pu;npi ng R_~:~cei
,Atun c pailty
Anchorage
P.O. ',....'X 196650
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650
(907) 264-4111
TONY KNOWLES,
MAYOR
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Hugh Bevan, P.E.
Bevan Engineering
P.O. Box 112852
Anchorage, Alaska 99511
Subject: Lot 1 Stoneview Subdivision
Encroachment on 100 foot stream setback requirement
Dear Mro Bevan:
This department has received a copy of an as-built survey that
shows a "seasonal stream" running within 100 feet of the septic
system on the subject lot. This information is inconsistent
with existing department records which describe the stream as
being located a distance "150 plus" from the septic system.
Until this discrepancy is resolved, the Health Authority
Approval issued for this property on June 1, 1987 is revoked.
If you have questions regarding this matter please contact me
at 343-4744.
Sincerely,
Stephen S. Morris
civil Engineer
On-site Services.
cc
Jo Ellen Vice
Alaska USA, Federal Credit Union
P.O. Box 199613
Anchorage, AK 99519-6613
Gus Andress, P.E.
Manager, On-site and Water Quality Programs
BEVAN ENGINEERING
P.O. Box 112852
Anchorage, AK 99511
(907) 522-1383
June 15, 1987
Hunicipality of Anchorage
Department of Health & Environmental Protection
825 "L" Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Re : Bill & Louanne Stone, Health Authority Application Lot 1 Stoneview Subdivision
Attn : Steve Horris
Dear Steve:
Reference is made to your recent letter revoking the Health Authority Approval
for the subject property.
A 100 foot offset line was staked to the westof the septic system by an RLS.
'Based upon this s~rveyed line I located a new channnel for the 0~66 cfs creek
which lies at an average distance of 92.5 feet from the septib system.
-A new stream channel was excavated at an average distance of 125 feet from the
septic system. The ~tream was sucessfull¥ re-routed into the new channel.
~~.E.
cc Bill Stone
87219-ws
DEPT. OD ~ ~&
ENVIRONMEN,~AtL
~ FLATTOP TECHNICAL SERVICES
14530 Echo St., Aachorage, AK 99516
Ph. (907) 345-1355
ADEQUACY TEST DATA SHEET
Legal Description:.
Street Address:
Client Name:
Test Date:
TeSted By:
Initial Conditions:
Float #1 in F~, ~. set~z'-3" b.t.o, e¥" pipe w. d " fluid
Float #2 in~?A~ ~ set {~f "b.t.o. ~ "pipe w. ~e" fluid
Float #3.ing~=~ ~.~/~set z%-" b.t.o.. 3~" pipe w. o" fluid
Float #4 in set " b.t.o. "pipe w. " fluid
Water added through: S~c. 0 ~.
Measured Well Yield = Adequate for Bdrms
Unit Absorption Capacity
Surge Capacity
Averag9 Absorption Rate = Adequate for ~ Bdrms
un c p n yof
Anchorage
p.O.E'~'~(196650
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650
(907) 343-4200
TONY KNOWLES,
MA YOR
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
July 21, 1987
Hugh Bevan, P.E.
Bevan Engineering
P.O. Box 112852
Anchorage, Alaska 99511
Subject: Lot 1 Stoneview Subdivision
Dear Mr. Bevan:
I am writing in response to your letter of July 13, 1987. In
this letter you took exception to an inference made in my June
17 letter to you that your adequacy test was improper or
incorrect. As you know, my letter was written without the
benefit of your input or rebuttal to the "allegations" made by
Mr. Moore. I would have preferred to hear the arguments and
reasoning behind your site evaluation before writing the June
17 letter but both the buyer (Mr. Horowitz) and seller (Mr.
Stone) were very anxious to resolve the situation quickly and
could not wait for your return from Fairbanks. I tried to make
it clear in my letter that the discrepancies brought up by Mr.
Moore could be resolved by way of explanation and that the
letter was written before you had an opportunity to speak to
these discrepancies.
I have reviewed the procedures and reasoning you used in
evaluating the adequacy of the septic system and have concluded
that a proper evaluation was performed. I would like to
emphasize that this is the first time I have had an opportunity
to review the details of your adequacy test. Provided below
are comments to some of the points brought up on page 2 of your
letter in which you describe your testing methodology.
The original condition of the septic system prior to
the standpipe modifications was not observed by this
department or Mr. Moore. The department has no
reason to doubt your initial observations.
Bevan Engineering
July 21, 1987
Page Two
Prior to m~dification the south standpipe extended
3.6 feet into the gravel. Although it would be
preferable for the standpipe to extend to the bottom
of the gravel as is now required by code, I agree
that the existing standpipe provided enough
information to sufficiently evaluate the performance
of the system.
The department/was g~ven the impression that the
house had been~occup~ed for some t~me and as a
result the system would not be working at its normal
operating level at the time of your test. The
assumption that the system was at its normal
operating level is critical to the interpretation of
your data.
I agree with your conclusion that sufficient
unpolluted sidewall existed above the operating
level of the septic system for a three bedroom
dwelling. Again, this conclusion is based on the
assumption that the system was at its normal
operating level.
I agree with your conclusion that by injecting 255
gallons of water into the trench without a rise to
the minus 3.6 level in the standpipe demonstrates
that the system is operating below the minus 3.6
level. I disagree that this proves that the
original soils rating of 125 sq. ft. per bedroom was
conservative. I believe that this can be
established only by measuring the infiltration
rate. This was not done during your tests.
I was not aware that the introduction of 700 gallons
of water into the septic tank on May 29, 1987 was
intended to test the integrity of the piping system
and not to retest the adequacy of the system.
I do not think that your conclusion here was ever
contested by this department. The lot line issue
was a point of contention between the buyer and
seller.
I do not agree the department participated in "railroad"
enforcement procedures against Mr. Stone. As I stated earlier,
both Mr. Stone and Mr. Horowitz were very anxious to resolve
Bevan Engineering
July 21, 1987
Page Three
the situation. Mr. S~one was willing proceed with repairs
without the benefit of your input for the sake of expediency.
If the information regarding your original adequacy test were
available to me earlier a new adequacy would not have been
required.
The fact remains that Mr. Stone deliberately and knowingly
installed a standpipe that served no useful purpose. After the
modifications to this south standpipe there were no useful
monitoring tubes or cleanouts in the absorption trench. Future
adequacy tests would have to be performed without knowing the
operating level of the system or being able to measure the
infiltration rate. The correct installation of this south
standpipe would have been required in any event.
In short, the department has found that the methods used to
evaluate the adequacy of the septic system were sound in this
case. I would like to point out that the methods and reasoning
used by engineers in conducting adequacy tests are rarely
questioned or scrutinized. In this case the department was
presented with information from another engineer that
questioned the validity of your original adequacy test. The
decision to require another adequacy test was made in lieu of a
of an explanation or rebuttal from you.
Sincerely,
Morris
civil Engineer
On-site Services
CC
Gus Andress, P.E.
Manager, On-site and Water Quality Programs
Virginia Johnson~ Fortune Properties
Barbara Lyon, Marston Real Estate
Bill Stone
uni¢ip li Yo
Anchorage
P.O. BOX 196650
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519.-6650
(907) 264-4111
TONYKNOWLES,
MAYOR
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN sERVICES
June 17, 1987
Hugh Bevan, P.E.
Bevan Engineering
P.O. Box 112852
Anchorage, Alaska 99511
Subject: Lot 1 Stoneview Subdivision, Health Authority Approval
Dear Mr. Bevan:
This Department has received an independent evaluation of the
septic system on the subject lot by way of a letter written by
Ted Moore, P.E. to Mr. Warren Horowitz. A copy of this letter
is attached. Mr. Moore has brought up a number of
discrepancies regarding the septic system that must be resolved
before a Health Authority Approval can be issued for the
property. I have itemized some of the points brought out in
Moore's letter below.
Based on the elevation of the wasteline at the foundation
cleanout, Moore determined that the drainfield standpipes
terminated at a level above the gravel in the drainfield.
The results of any adequacy test performed without monitor
tubes are questionable unless it can be established that
the storage capacity of the rock-filled trench has been
exhausted. The meaningfulness of an adequacy test
conducted by introducing 700 gallons of water into an
absorption field without monitor tubes is questionable.
Moore contends that only ninety percent of the stream flow
was rerouted into the new channel and that the remaining
flow should require a formal waiver.
As for item 3 above, I believe that the stream setback problem
has been substantially resolved and a formal waiver is not
necessary. Unless the discrepancies brought up in items 1 and
2 can be addressed by way of explanation this department will
require that at least one four inch monitor tube be installed
at one end of the trench. This monitor tube should be attached
to the perforated drainfield piping with a sweep. A minimum of
three feet of perforated pipe should extend into the gravel
below this sweep connection.
After the installati~'6f the monitor tube another adequacy
test should be performed. The results of this adequacy test
must be submitted to this department.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please give me
a call. I realize that you have not had the opportunity to
speak to the discrepancies brought up in this letter.
Sincerely,
Morris
civil Engineer
On-site Services
cc
Gus Andress, P.E.
Manager, On-site and Water Quality Programs
Virginia Johnson, Fortune Properties
Barbara Lyon, Marston Real Estate
Bill Stone
BEVAN ENGINEERING
July 13, 1987
Steve Morris
Department of Health & Human Services
Box 196650
Anchorage, Alaska 99519
P.O. Box 112852
Anchorage, AK 99511
(907) 522-1383
Re : Lot 1 Stoneview Subdivision
Dear Steve :
I am writing in response to your letter dated June 17, 1987. In this letter you
required that my client Bill Stone install a septic monitor tube and hire a
second adequacy test by an engineer.
It is my contention that the additional adequacy test was not necessary. I
further contend that .the decision by you to require said test was made based
upon incomplete information supplied to you by Mr. Harowitz~s engineer. This
action by you resulted in an unnecessary'and excessive extra engineering cost
to Mr. Stone..
-Attached to this letter is a summary of my field data and the decision
processes I employed as the subject project developed.
After reading this report I expect a ~ritten response from you ~ith a finding
of the'fact in ~hich my adequacy testing methodologies used in this case are
clearly condemed or exonerated.
Attachments
Stoneview Rebuttal 3 pages
CC
Bill Stone
Virginia Johnson, Fortune Properties
Barbara Lyon, Marston Real Estate
87219-ws
Re : Lot 1Stoneview
1) During development of the house site the septic system was buried under
approximately 12 feet of gravel. The standpipes were brought up to near surface
level with cheap couplings and minimal compaction. As such they were
substantially misaligned to the ~est ~d damaged by soil pressures. I will also
point out here that I was the only engineer to inspect the site in its original
condition and speculations by others as to the original conditions are
meaningless.
2) When I arrived on the site the south standpipe reached a depth of - 3.6 feet
below the fluid level in the tank .( See Exhibit ~1 ). There was no fluid in
this standpipe nor was there a septic smell to the soil particles I retrieved
with a probe from the south standpipe.
3) Since the home was presently occupied and had been for some time I concluded
that the system was at its normal operating level. This level was obviously
below the -3.6 foot elevation. I concluded that the system had a minimum of 3.6
feet of unpolluted trench sidewall gravels with an absorptive area of
~2)*(3.6)*(52) = 374 square feet.
4) The original soils rating used in the septic design was 125 square feet per
bedroom. As such the minimum required sidewall area for a 3 bedroom home was
(125)*~3) = 375 square feet. I concluded that the system had sufficient,
unpolluted sidewall area and the above numerical comparision gave me confidence
that the system was adequate for 3 bedrooms.
5) On 5-12-87 I injected 255 gallons into the south standpipe during a 3 hour
well flow test. No rise was observed in the standpipe as was expected due to
the topography and geology of the site. I concluded from my test data that the
normal operating level was below the 3.6 foot level and that the original soils
rating of 125 was conservative.
6) On May 29, 1987 I hired a tank truck and injected the infamous 700 gallons
of clear water directly into the septic tank. The intent of this procedure was
to test the integrity of the piping system leading from the tank to and
including the distribution pipe. I was concerned that due to the higher than
average overburden depth Cweight) the piping might be crushed, out of round, or
that a pipe joint had separated. The water was injected at a rate of
approximately 25 gallons per minute with no rise observed in the tank level.
This test confirmed my opinion that the system was adequate for 3 bedrooms.
7) When the lot line problem arose I advised Mr. Stone to get a lot line
waiver, which he did. Based upon the asbuilt survey dated May 12, 1987 and upon
my geometric computations I concluded that the system only protruded onto Lot 1
~.~,,.1.~O~,~1~. Since my inspection of the original south standpipe revealed
that it was bent to the Nest, I felt that the entire system was on Lot 1.
PaCe 2
Re : Lot 1Stoneview
Summary
I do not concur with the concept that there is only one way to determine the
acceptiblity of an on-site septic system. The entire process is extremely site
specific and the use of tunnel vision, single method testing processes
definitely results in a false sense of security. Strict reliance upon a falling
head permeability test in an "inspection tube" gives the engineer only limited
information about the system as a whole.
If the MOA intends to participate in "railroad" inforcement procedures as were
used on Mr. Stone, I suggest that you redefine the ordinance to include the
testing methods a Professional Engineer must use in order to satisfy your
requirements.
I do admit an error in judgement regarding the standpipe repair issue, although
Mr. Stone was given ample instructions as to the requirements of a monitor
tube. The majority of septic systems in Anchorage have at least one substandard
standpipe. In the present economic climate most citizens cannot afford the $250
required to repair a standpipe, especially if it involves a perfectly
functional septic system. In the future I will definitely refer all
questionable standpipes to you for enforcement.
A second error on my part was my effort to provide sincere cooperation to Mr.
Harowtitz and his engineer Mr. Ted Moore. I most certainly will not extend this
professional courtesy to Mr. Moore in the future.
Attachments
Exhibit ~1
87219-ws
Page 3
APPLIr 'NT FILLS OUT UPPER HA ONLY
Property Owne~' /"~)Z~.~ ~-'~- ~<';-~0 Al ~ Phone
Address Zip Code
Lending institution ~LA~¢~ ~Ag( F /~- ~ NlQ Phone
Address Zip Code
Legal Description ~ b~ ~ ~TO ~l ~ { ~ ~&~ ~dt% f ~ ~t
Type of Residence
Single Family
~Multiple Family NO. of Bedroom.
Water Supply
~ Community For wells drilled prior to that date, give well depth (attach log if available).
Sewer Disposal
~lndividual Year Individual Installed: / ~ ~
~ Public Utility When Connected to Public Utility:
~ Holding Tank
NOTE: THE INSPECTION F~E MUST ACCOMPANY EACH RE~EST BEFORE ~OCESSING CAN BE INITIATED.
Time Time Time Time
,u~JCjp~hy O~ ,AMCHO~OE
REcEiVED
Soils Rating Dqe~wer Installed Well TO Absorption Area Well Log Received
~'~/~ ,Well=to Tank Septic T~k Size
72-023(3182)